Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Heart Journal logoLink to British Heart Journal
. 1965 May;27(3):344–354. doi: 10.1136/hrt.27.3.344

COMPARISON OF ELECTROCARDIOGRAMS AND VECTORCARDIOGRAMS IN CONGENITAL AORTIC STENOSIS*,†

Raul Gamboa 1, Paul G Hugenholtz 1, Alexander S Nadas 1
PMCID: PMC503316  PMID: 14284351

Full text

PDF
344

Images in this article

349Image
on p.349
349Image
on p.349
350Image
on p.350

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BRAUNWALD E., GOLDBLATT A., AYGEN M. M., ROCKOFF S. D., MORROW A. G. Congenital aortic stenosis. I. Clinical and hemodynamic findings in 100 patients. II. Surgical treatment and the results of operation. Circulation. 1963 Mar;27:426–462. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.27.3.426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BRISTOW J. D., PORTER G. A., GRISWOLD H. E. Observations with the Frank system of vectorcardiography in left ventricular hypertrophy. Am Heart J. 1961 Nov;62:621–633. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(61)90370-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burger H. C., Van Milaan J. B. HEART-VECTOR AND LEADS. Br Heart J. 1946 Jul;8(3):157–161. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. CABRERA E., MONROY J. R. Systolic and diastolic loading of the heart. I. Physiologic and clinical data. Am Heart J. 1952 May;43(5):661–668. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(52)90041-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. FRANK E. An accurate, clinically practical system for spatial vectorcardiography. Circulation. 1956 May;13(5):737–749. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.13.5.737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. GRIEP A. H. Pitfalls in the electrocardiographic diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy; a correlative study of 200 autopsied patients. Circulation. 1959 Jul;20(1):30–34. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.20.1.30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. GRIMM A. F., KUBOTA R., WHITEHORN W. V. Properties of myocardium in cardiomegaly. Circ Res. 1963 Jan;12:118–124. doi: 10.1161/01.res.12.1.118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. HELM R. A., FOWLER N. O., Jr A simplified method for determining the angle between two spatial vectors. Am Heart J. 1953 Jun;45(6):835–840. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(53)90131-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HUGENHOLTZ P. G., FORKNER C. E., Jr, LEVINE H. D. A clinical appraisal of the vectorcardiogram in myocardial infarction. II. The Frank system. Circulation. 1961 Oct;24:825–850. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.24.4.825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. HUGENHOLTZ P. G., GAMBOA R. EFFECT OF CHRONICALLY INCREASED VENTRICULAR PRESSURE ON ELECTRICAL FORCES OF THE HEART. A CORRELATION BETWEEN HEMODYNAMIC AND VECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC DATA (FRANK SYSTEM) IN 90 PATIENTS WITH AORTIC OR PULMONIC STENOSIS. Circulation. 1964 Oct;30:511–530. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.30.4.511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. HUGENHOLTZ P. G., LIEBMAN J. The orthogonal vectorcardiogram in 100 normal children (Frank system). With some comparative data recorded by the cube system. Circulation. 1962 Nov;26:891–901. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.26.5.891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. LANGNER P. H., Jr, OKADA R. H., MOORE S. R., FIES H. L. Comparison of four orthogonal systems of vectorcardiography. Circulation. 1958 Jan;17(1):46–54. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.17.1.46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. LINZBACH A. J. Heart failure from the point of view of quantitative anatomy. Am J Cardiol. 1960 Mar;5:370–382. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(60)90084-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. MONROE R. G. MYOCARDIAL OXYGEN CONSUMPTION DURING VENTRICULAR CONTRACTION AND RELAXATION. Circ Res. 1964 Apr;14:294–300. doi: 10.1161/01.res.14.4.294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. SCHMITT O. H., SIMONSON E. The present status of vectorcardiography. AMA Arch Intern Med. 1955 Nov;96(5):574–590. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. SCOTT R. C. The correlation between the electrocadiographic patterns of ventricular hypertrophy and the anatomic findings. Circulation. 1960 Feb;21:256–291. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.21.2.256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. SELZER A., EBNOTHER C. L., PACKARD P., STONE A. O., QUINN J. E. Reliability of electrocardiographic diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy. Circulation. 1958 Feb;17(2):255–265. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.17.2.255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. SELZER A., NARUSE D. Y., YORK E., KAHN K. A., MATTHEWS H. B. Electrocardiographic findings in concentric and eccentric left ventricular hypertrophy. Am Heart J. 1962 Mar;63:320–328. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(62)90276-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. TOOLE J. G., von der GROEBEN, SPIVACK A. P. The calculated tempero-spatial heart vector in proved isolated left ventricular overwork. Am Heart J. 1962 Apr;63:537–544. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(62)90311-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. WALKER C. H., ROSE R. L. Importance of age, sex and body habitus in the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy from the precordial electrocardiogram in childhood and adolescence. Pediatrics. 1961 Nov;28:705–711. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. WALLACE A. G., McCALL B. W., ESTES E. H., Jr The vector-cardiogram in left ventricular hypertrophy. A study using the Frank lead system. Am Heart J. 1962 Apr;63:466–476. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(62)90302-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. YANO K., PIPBERGER H. V. CORRELATIONS BETWEEN RADIOLOGIC HEART SIZE AND ORTHOGONAL ELECTROCARDIOGRAMS IN PATIENTS WITH LEFT VENTRICULAR OVERLOAD. Am Heart J. 1964 Jan;67:44–52. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(64)90397-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES