Abstract
Lanthionine Synthetase Cyclase-Like 2 (LANCL2) is a novel therapeutic target for Crohn's disease (CD). BT-11 is a small molecule that binds LANCL2, is orally active, and has demonstrated therapeutic efficacy in 3 validated mouse models of colitis at doses as low as 8 mg/kg/day. Exploratory experiments evaluated BT-11 in male Harlan Sprague Dawley rats with a single oral dose of 500 mg/kg and 80 mg/kg/day for 14 days (n=10 rats dosed/group). Treated and control rats were observed for behavioral detriments, and blood and tissues were collected for clinical pathology and histopathological examination. A functional observational battery demonstrated no differences between treated and control groups over multiple times of observation for quantal, categorical and continuous endpoints, including posture, in-cage activity, approach, response to touch, weight, grip strength, body temperature, and time on a rotarod. Histopathological examination of brain, kidney, liver, adrenal gland, testes, stomach, small and large intestines, duodenum, pancreas, heart, lungs, spleen, thymus and rib found no significant differences between the groups. Plasma enzymes associated with liver function were transiently elevated 2-4 days after the 500 mg/kg single dose but returned to normal values by 8 days and were not observed at any time in rats given 80 mg/kg/day for 14 days. One hour after oral administration of a single 80 mg/kg dose, BT-11 had a maximal concentration of 21 ng/ml; the half-life was 3 hr. These experimental results demonstrated that BT-11 is well-tolerated in rats, and, with further testing, may hold promise as an orally active therapeutic for CD.
Keywords: LANCL2, safety, toxicology, BT-11, rats
INTRODUCTION
According to the Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America, Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) afflicts over 1.4 million people in North America and 4 million worldwide. This widespread and debilitating illness results in decreased quality of life and significant health care-related costs [1]. In addition, intestinal inflammation caused by the two clinical manifestations of IBD, ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), increases the risk for developing colon cancer especially at early ages (< 30 years of age) [2].
Even though current treatments for IBD have improved [3,4,5], they are only modestly successful for chronically managing the disease and result in significant adverse side effects, including a diminished ability of the immune system to mount protective responses against pathogens and malignancies. The current treatment paradigm for IBD includes aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, immunomodulators, antibiotics, and biologics (e.g., anti-TNFα monoclonal antibody) [5]. Thus, there is an unmet clinical need for developing safer and more effective therapeutics for IBD.
One such approach is described here. Lanthionine Synthetase Cyclase-like Receptor 2 (LANCL2) has emerged as a promising therapeutic target for chronic inflammatory, metabolic and immune-mediated diseases such as IBD [6]. LANCL2 is expressed in the hematopoietic system, specifically in neutrophils, monocytes and splenocytes, as well as locally in gut CD4+ T cells and colon epithelial cells. Abscisic acid (ABA) binds to LANCL2, leading to elevation of intracellular cAMP, activation of phosphokinase A (PKA), and suppression of inflammation [7]. We identified PubChem compound CID247228 [8], N1,N4-bis(3-(1H-benzo[d]imidazo-2-yl)phenyl)terephthalamide, the parent compound of BT-11, piperazine-1,4-diylbis((6-(1H-benzo[d]imidazo-2-y)pyridin-2-yl)methanone), as a ligand of LANCL2 and a potent oral anti-inflammatory therapeutic in mice with colitis [9]. Biotherapeutics, Inc. developed libraries of new chemical entities based on derivatives and analogs of ABA and CID2472278 [10]. Screening for LANCL2 binding and lead optimization based on efficacy, selectivity, local activity in the gut, and safety resulted in the selection of BT-11 as a top lead compound for CD treatment.
Oral treatment of mice with BT-11, demonstrated a 90% reduction in gut inflammation combined with a 4X reduction of colonic lesions in doses efficacious at 80 mg/kg and at doses as low as 8 mg/kg. These histological improvements observed in 3 mouse models of colitis correlated with decreased numbers of inflammatory F4/80+ CD11b+ macrophages and effector T helper 1 cells (Th1) in the gut mucosa. BT-11 also increased the levels of anti-inflammatory (FOXP3)-expressing CD4+ T regulatory cells in the colonic lamina propria, spleen, and mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN), and decreased the levels of Th1 cells and Th17 cells in the spleen and MLN, respectively [9]. Furthermore, oral administration of BT-11 up-regulated the colonic expression of interleukin (IL-10) and LANCL2, and down-regulated the expression of tumor necrosis factor TNFα in a dose-dependent manner. The present study investigated the exploratory profile of BT-11 in rats in preparation for investigational new drug (IND)-enabling GLP studies in rats and dogs.
To further support the development of BT-11 as an orally active, locally acting small molecule drug for CD, initial exploratory pharmacokinetic (PK) and exploratory safety studies were conducted in male Sprague Dawley rats, as this species provides the most common rodent model for in vivo preclinical studies used to support an IND application that are recommended by the International Conference for Harmonization [11,12]. The single dose study used a high dose to approach the maximal tolerated dose and to facilitate the design of repeated dose studies. Initial PK studies were also done after single dose administration, with blood concentrations measured 0.5-48 hours following oral administration. Results contributed to choice of dose for a 14-day exploratory repeated dose study which should provide indication of capability for the test agent to be tolerated for longer periods of time. For these single and repeated dose studies, behavioral and physiological effects were evaluated along with pathological effects. The results of the experiments described suggest that BT-11 is well-tolerated in rats, and that further, more comprehensive studies would be warranted to position this test agent as a potential therapeutic agent.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Preparation and Purification of the Test Compound (BT-11)
The test compound, piperazine-1,4-diylbis((6-(1H-benzo[d]imidazo-2-y)pyridin-2-yl)methanone), is a bis(benzimidazolylaryl) heterocycle with structural similarity to N1,N4-bis(3-(1H-benzo[d]imidazo-2-yl)phenyl)terephthalamide, which is the chemical identified by PubChem as CID247228, and which has other identifiers, including NSC61610 [8,9,10].
Purification of BT-11 (1.46 g) was done from powder dissolved in hot DMSO (90°C, 30 ml). After cooling overnight, the precipitate was centrifuged at 3,200 g for 1h. The supernatant was removed and the solid was again re-dissolved in hot DMSO (20 mL). The precipitate was centrifuged at 3,200 g for 1h. The supernatant was discarded and the pellet was re-suspended in acetonitrile (CH3CN), vortexed and centrifuged. The supernatant was discarded and the white solid was dried under high vacuum (recovery 870 mg, or 60%). Purity was >98% as determined by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR).
For these studies, the test compound was administered by oral gavage as a suspension in a pharmaceutical grade vehicle (Ora Plus®, Perrigo, Dublin, IR). A suspension of 100 mg/mL was used to provide the dose of 500 mg/kg and a suspension of 20 mg/mL was used for dosing 80 mg/kg. Control animals were given equivalent volumes of the suspending vehicle. The suspension concentrations were chosen to provide volumes acceptable to Virginia Tech's Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC protocols 14-065 and 14-178) for oral administration of the mg/kg dosages to the rats.
Single and Repeated Dose Studies; Dosing and Sample Collection
All studies used adult Sprague Dawley male rats 200-250 g (>46 days old, Harlan Laboratories, Dublin, VA). Rats were group housed (2 per cage) on Diamond Dry Cellulose Bedding (Harlan Laboratories), and provided with a standard pelleted rat chow and water ad libitum until 12 hours before dosing. During the 5-7 day quarantine period rats were adapted to a reverse light cycle (lights on at 9:00 p.m., off at 9:00 a.m.). The single dose study with 0 or 500 mg/kg of BT-11 used a dose that was >60-fold over an efficacious dose (8 mg/kg), as determined by experimental studies in mice [9]. The repeated dose experiment used a dose of 80 mg/kg, also based on doses effective in mice. To alleviate interference with oral absorption, animals were fasted 12 hours prior to dosing of the test compound with an oral gavage needle. For the repeated dose experiment, 80 mg/kg was given daily for 14 days, followed by a 7-day drug-free observation period.
Physiological endpoints (body weight) and behavioral endpoints (a functional observational battery that evaluates general appearance, mobility, and nervous system functioning) were done before and at multiple points after dosing (noted in the FOB section below). The number of rats in each group was sufficient to provide statistically significant behavioral data (n=10, except n=8 for day 21).
Additional treated animals were terminated (n = 3/treatment/time point, n=4 for controls) to perform clinical pathology studies and histopathological observations. For the single dose study (500 mg/kg) these were at 2, 4, 8 and 14 days post-dosing. For the repeated dose study these were at 4, 8, 14 (day of last dose) and 21 days.
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Study; Dosing and Sample Collection
For the pharmacokinetic study, 12 adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (Harlan Laboratories) arrived with indwelling jugular catheters. They were individually caged on Diamond Dry Cellulose Bedding (Harlan Laboratories) and given a standard pelleted rat chow and water ad libitum. Rats were allowed to acclimate for 5 days prior to dosing, during which they were monitored for post-operative health issues and had their catheters checked for patency. Following 12 hours fasting, all rats were administered 80 mg/kg of the test agent by oral gavage. Blood samples were taken from a minimum of 3 rats at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 25 and 48 hr after dosing. Catheterized rats were bled (0.5 mL) more than once, but no more than twice within a 24 hr period based on IACUC recommendations. Test agent concentrations in plasma were determined by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).
Plasma Sample Preparation and LC-MS/MS Analysis for PK Studies
Blood samples were collected with heparinized syringes via the exteriorized ends of the jugular vein catheters. The samples were transferred to BD Microtainer® blood collection tubes (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) with EDTA and centrifuged to separate the plasma. The plasma supernatant was removed and stored in Eppendorf tubes at −20°C.
Purified test compound BT-11 and reserpine (MP Biomedicals LLC, Santa Anna, CA) were used as standard and internal standard, respectively. BT-11 was accurately weighed and transferred into a 5-mL volumetric flask. The analyte was completely dissolved in 5 mL of 10% formic acid (FA) in acetonitrile (CH3CN) (standard solution #1, SS1). Then 10μL of SS1 was diluted 1,000 times in CH3CN. This solution was used to prepare all standard solutions. For internal standard preparation, 2.0 mg of reserpine was dissolved in 10% FA in CH3CN (2 mL) and mixed thoroughly (ISS1). Then 10μL of ISS1 was diluted to 10mL with CH3CN (ISS2). This solution was used to spike all samples. The BT-11 calibration curve was obtained from 7 standard solutions containing plasma (100 μL) ranging from 0.5 to 15 ng/mL. The lowest level of quantitation was 0.2 ng/ml (200 ppt).
Before injecting for analysis, plasma (100μL) was mixed with ISS2 (10μL) and CH3CN (200μL). The solution was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was transferred to a clean tube. CH3CN (100μL) was added to the pellet. After vortexing and centrifugation, both supernatants were combined. After evaporation of CH3CN, 50/50% H2O/CH3N (1 mL) was added. The solution was vortexed and centrifuged for 2 min. The solution was transferred into a HPLC glass vial for analysis.
Blood plasma samples were run in duplicate using a HPLC column from Phenomenex (Torrence, CA), Luna C18 150 × 2.1 mm, 3 μm. The flow rate was set at 0.2 mL/min and the injection volume at 50 μL (into a 20 μL loop). The mobile phase consisted of a mixture of A (H2O with 1% FA) and B (CH3CN with 1% formic acid), with gradients alternating 3 times between 95% A: 5% B and 5%A: 95% B over 15 minutes. For MS/MS analysis the LC column effluent was pumped directly into the Thermo Instrument TSQ triple quadruple mass spectrometer (Thermo Finnigan, San Jose, CA) equipped with an electrospray ionization (ESI) source. The instrument was calibrated with a solution of polytyrosine according to the manufacturer's recommendation. Optimal parameters were obtained with the BT-11 standard (10 ng/μL) flowing at a rate of 10 μL/min into 50/50% A/B of mobile phase at a rate of 0.2 mL/min to achieve reasonable MS sensitivity in Multiple Reaction Monitoring (MRM). MS parameters for detection were: Spray Voltage 4500 V, Sheath Gas Pressure 45 psi, Auxiliary Gas Pressure 55 psi, Capillary Temperature 300°C, Parent Ion 265.00 ([MH2]2+) for test compound BT-11 and 609.00 for internal standard reserpine ([MH]+), Monitored Product Ion 193.87 for test compound BT-11 and 194.97 for internal standard reserpine, positive polarity. In order to keep the MS clean, the divert valve was used to transfer the column effluent to the MS from time 8.0-9.3 min. From time 0-8.0 min and 9.3-15 min all the column effluent was transferred to waste.
Determination of PK Properties
Pharmacokinetic calculations used a simple average obtained from results of duplicate analyses for blood from each of 3 rats at each time point for n=3. Data generated were based on medians and on geometric means, with both suggesting that the data followed an approximate one-compartment model. The median-based curve was smoother and was subsequently used in downstream analyses as appropriate. Median plasma concentrations were entered into PKSolver (an add-in program for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics data analysis in Microsoft Excel) for determination of elimination rate constant (kel), apparent volume of distribution (Vd), clearance (Cl) and half-life (T ½) [13]. The maximal concentration (Cmax) and the time to Cmax (Tmax) were estimated from observing the graph of median plasma concentrations versus time. The absorption rate constant (ka) was generated by fitting a one-compartment mathematical model to the data using JMP® Pro version 11.2.0 (Cary, NC, USA). Although area under the curve (AUC) was calculated, it could not be used to determine bioavailability (F) because the test compound was too insoluble to administer by the intravenous route and no comparison could be made.
Functional Observational Battery (FOB)
The Functional Observational Battery (FOB) was performed using the Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) of the Laboratory for Neurotoxicity Studies at Virginia Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine (VMCVM), which follows the template of Moser et al. [14]. A baseline assessment was made prior to dosing (study day −3 or −4) and then assessments were performed at 4 hours and 1, 7 and 14 days after dosing for the single dose study and at 3, 7, 14 and 21 days during the repeated dose study.
For each assessment, rats were first observed in their home cage for posture, clonic and tonic involuntary movements, vocalizations, respirations and activity level. Following that, rats were observed during handling for cage removal ease, lacrimation, salivation, piloerection, palpebral closure, palpebral reflex, pupil size and general handling reactivity, as well as pupil light, oculocardiac and visual placing responses. Next, rats were placed in an open field for three minutes and observed for clonic and tonic involuntary movements, gait, mobility, arousal, stereotypy and bizarre behavior along with counts of rearing, fecal boluses and urine pools. Animals were then tested for the following reflexes: approach, touch, click and tail pinch responses, and righting and tail-limb reflexes. The FOB was concluded by taking the following physiological measurements: body weight, body temperature, time on an accelerating rotarod, fore- and hind limb grip strength, and landing foot splay distance following a 30 cm drop.
Pathological Procedures
Rats were euthanized at sacrifice by intraperitoneal injection of 200 mg/kg of sodium pentobarbital. Blood was collected from the inferior vena cava for complete blood count and clinical chemistry (n=3-4/group). Blood samples were analyzed using standard endpoints for hematology and blood chemistry, as conducted for patient samples submitted to the Clinical Pathology Laboratory of the Veterinary Medicine Teaching Hospital. These analyses include red blood cell concentrations, hemoglobin, hematocrit, mean corpuscular volumes, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, cell hemoglobin concentration, platelet number, mean platelet volume, reticulocytes, white blood cell count and differential, glucose, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, phosphorus, calcium, sodium, potassium, chloride, carbon dioxide, anion gap, cholesterol, total protein, albumin, globulins, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and bilirubin.
The following tissues were collected and immersion-fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for histopathological examination: brain, kidney, liver, adrenal gland, testes, stomach, small and large intestines, duodenum/pancreas, heart, lungs, spleen, thymus, and rib (including hematopoietic tissue of marrow). Rib samples were decalcified overnight using decalcifying solution with formic acid and formalin (EDF™, Medline, Mundelein, IL) prior to all tissues being trimmed and submitted to the Histopathology Laboratory of the Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital. The samples were dehydrated and cleared and embedded in paraffin. The samples (n=3) were then sectioned at 5 μm thickness, stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and examined by light microscopy by a board certified veterinary pathologist in a non-blinded fashion.
Statistics
The rat FOB included measurement of quantal, categorical and continuous endpoints. Quantal endpoints (identified as either present/normal or absent/abnormal) were piloerection, palpebral reflex, pupil light response, oculocardiac reflex, visual placing, tail-limb reflex, vocalization, and normality of respiration. Categorical (scored) endpoints of the FOB included posture, in-cage activity, handling reactivity, in-cage arousal score, response to approach and response to touch. Quantal and categorical end points were summarized as contingency tables and compared between treatment groups at each time point (one outcome at a time) using Fisher's exact test (single dose experiment) or the Mantel-Haenszel chi-square (repeated dose experiment). The Mantel-Haenszel test was selected for the repeated dose experiment because the rats were processed in 2 blocks. Continuous endpoints were weight, body temperature, number of rears during observation period, seconds on a rotating rod, foreleg grip strength, hind leg grip strength, and landing foot splay splay. Normal probability plots showed that all continuous end points followed a normal distribution. Subsequently, continuous endpoints were summarized as means ± standard deviation. At baseline, treatment groups were compared (separately for each outcome) using 2-sample t-tests (single dose experiment) or mixed model analysis of variance (repeated dose experiment). During follow-up (for both single dose and repeated dose experiments), the treatment groups were compared using mixed-model analysis of covariance, with baseline measurements as covariates. The linear models specified baseline measurements, treatment group, time, and the interaction between treatment group and time as fixed effects with Kenward-Roger as the denominator degrees of freedom. Random effects were rat identification within treatment group (both single dose and repeated dose experiments) and block (repeated dose experiment). To specifically compare treatment groups at each follow-up time point the slicediff option of proc glimmix was applied to the interaction between treatment group and time. Clinical pathology also provides continuous endpoints; these were evaluated using one-way analysis of variance. Statistical significance was set to p < 0.05. Analyses for quantal, categorical and continuous endpoints were performed using SAS version 9.4 (Cary, NC, USA) while clinical pathology continuous end points were analyzed using JMP® Pro version 11.2.0 (Cary, NC, USA).
RESULTS
Single Dose Study, 0 or 500 mg/kg, Functional Observational Battery
No obvious behavioral evidence of detrimental effects were seen over the 2 weeks these animals were observed. Referring specifically to the FOB endpoints that were quantal (yes/no), categorical (scored), or continuous, the following statements can be made: (1) There were no differences in quantal endpoints between treated and control groups for piloerection, palpebral reflex, pupil light response, oculocardiac reflex, visual placing, tail-limb reflex, vocalization, or normality of respiration. These were identified as either present/normal or absent/abnormal (data not shown because all animals had the same response). (2) For categorical endpoints, compared at each time point using the using Mantel-Haenszel test, the control and treatment groups did not differ at time points beyond baseline. However, a significant difference was observed between the two groups for touch response at baseline (p<0.0406). (It is the only significant finding for all comparisons within all FOB end points.) (3) For continuous endpoints, no statistical differences between control and treated groups were noted at any time, with the exception of weight and hind grip strength (Figure 1). For weight on day 14, as illustrated in Fig 1, the least squares mean (LS Mean) for the 500 mg/kg BT-11 group was lower than the LS Mean for the vehicle control group (LS Means 254.71 vs. 264.46; p=0.0006). The groups did not differ for weight at any other time point. For hind grip strength, the LS mean for the 500 mg/kg group was lower than the LS mean for the control group on day 1 (LS Means 0.40 vs 0.46; p=0.0272). It is noteworthy that the differences for hind grip are really small despite reaching statistical significance. The groups did not differ at other time points.
Figure 1.
Time-related measurements of weight and hind grip strength 1-14 days after a single oral 500 mg/kg dose of BT-11. Results expressed as mean ± SD, n=10. Statistical differences between groups were seen with weight at 14 days and with hind grip strength on day 7.
Single Dose Study, 0 or 500 mg/kg, Pathological Assessment
Histopathologic comparison was made between vehicle control and BT-11-exposed animals. No significant differences were noted between the two groups at any of the post-dosing intervals (2, 4, 8 or 14 days). Some findings were noted in all animals, such as mild deep mucosal-submucosal eosinophilic infiltrates in the stomach, the presence of small numbers of mast cells in perivascular regions in the myocardium, and hepatic portal infiltrates of lymphocytes along with occasional eosinophils and neutrophils. These are considered as normal features of these animals, and not related to test article exposure.
Blood samples that underwent analyses in the Clinical Pathology Laboratory showed clinically significant increases in markers of hepatocellular injury (alanine aminotransferase, ALT; aspartate aminotransferase, AST) and cholestasis (alkaline phosphatase, ALP; total bilirubin, tBILI) on post dosing day 2 (ALT, AST, ALP and tBILI) and post dosing day 4 (AST and tBILI). However, these changes were not statistically significant (Table 1). The changes in blood values did not persist, as samples taken on days 8 and 15 were not clinically or statistically different from control values. The reversibility of these effects associated with the very high dose given reduces the significance of these findings. Other endpoints evaluated were not clinically significant, as blood samples from controls and treated rats demonstrated similar results.
Table 1.
Select mean plasma chemistry results from control rats and test rats 2, 4, 8 and 14 days after oral administration of BT-11 at a single dose of 500 mg/kg.
Parameter | Units | Control | Day 2 | Day 4 | Day 8 | Day 14 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALT | IU/L | 39a | 126a | 52a | 53a | 41a |
AST | IU/L | 69a | 269a | 106a | 80a | 67a |
ALP | IU/L | 300a | 376a | 294a | 288 a | 265a |
tBILI | mg/dL | 0.10a | 0.20a | 0.23a | 0.13 a | 0.10a |
Rows connected by the same letter are not significantly different, n=3-4. The parameters provided in the table are those that have possible clinical significance. Other parameters measured that were interpreted by the clinical pathologist as having neither clinical nor statistical significance are listed in Materials and Methods. Abbreviations: ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ALT, alkaline phosphatase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; tBILI, total bilirubin.
Pharmacokinetic Experiment, Single 80 mg/kg Oral Dose
The test compound could be detected at very low ng/ml (ppb) levels. The plasma samples obtained at 24-48 hr had very low but still measureable levels (1-2 ng/mL). For analytical procedures associated with pharmacokinetic studies, the biological samples (0.5 - 1 mL blood) were extracted and purified as described above under Methods. Results of chemical analysis of blood plasma are provided in Table 2.
Table 2.
Plasma concentrations of BT-11 in samples taken after administration of test compound.
Time after dosing with 80 mg/kg (hr) | Plasma concentration (ng/ml, n=3) | |
---|---|---|
Median (minimum; maximum) | Geometric mean of plasma concentration (95% lower and upper confidence limits) | |
0.5 | 12.18 (8.55; 29.89) | 14.60 (2.94; 72.53) |
1 | 20.95 (13.42; 49.11) | 23.99 (4.66; 123.40) |
2 | 16.88 (11.65; 38.62) | 19.65 (4.28; 90.23) |
4 | 11.07 (4.16; 12.14) | 8.24 (1.89; 35.94) |
8 | 4.33 (4.20; 7.91) | 5.24 (2.16; 12.73) |
12 | 1.83 (1.65; 2.07) | 1.84 (1.39; 2.45) |
16 | 1.40 (0.99; 8.98) | 2.31 (0.12; 44.19) |
20 | 1.39 (0.58; 1.49) | 1.06 (0.29; 3.90) |
24 | 1.01 (0.26; 3.22) | 0.95 (0.04; 21.25) |
48 | 1.90 (0.90; 2.27) | 1.57 (0.47; 5.31) |
Because plasma concentrations of the test agent were no longer decreasing by 12 hours after administration, median values for 0.5 – 8 hr were used for calculation of pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. Original plasma concentration (Cpo) was extrapolated by the computer from the straight line on a log scale of elimination that ran through the highest concentration (Cmax) so the parameters below could be provided.
Rate constant of elimination (kel) = −0.225 /hr
Apparent volume of distribution (Vd) = 3.375 L/kg
Clearance (Cl) = 0.760 ng/L/kg
Half-life (T ½) = 3.08 hr
Rate constant of absorption (ka) = 1.69 /hr (generated using JMP® version 11.2.0; SAS Institute, Cary NC)
The graph depicted in Figure 2 provides visualization of the pharmacokinetic data. The y-axis on this graph gives the data in ng/mL (ppb). By inspecting this graph and data in Table 2, Cmax was estimated as 21 ng/mL at a time after dosing (Tmax) of 1 hr.
Figure 2.
Plots of blood concentrations of BT-11 at various times after a single oral dose of 80 mg/kg, arithmetic y axis. This plot was used for estimation of Cmax and Tmax. Values depicted are expressed as median with errors bars representing the minimum and maximum at each time point, n=3.
From the data obtained and analyzed after rats were given a single 80 mg/kg oral dose, and assuming single-compartment, dose-independent pharmacokinetics, time to steady state (97% level) after repeated dosing would expect to occur at 5 × T ½, or approximately 15 hr. Usually the apparent Vd is determined from PK parameters calculated after intravenous (IV) injection of test compounds. This alleviates the confounding associated with drug absorption kinetics. As BT-11 is relatively insoluble at concentrations required to provide the test dose in an appropriate volume, IV administration was not feasible here, so an attempt was made to estimate an apparent Vd after oral administration.
Although not designated a pharmacokinetic study, some blood samples were collected from rats given the high dose (500 mg/kg) to evaluate a general time course of blood concentrations of BT-11. Concentrations were 32, 3.1 and 13 ng/mL in samples taken at 2 hr, 17, 15 and 6.7 ng/mL in samples taken at 4 hr, and 3.0, 9.6 and 3.3 ng/mL in samples taken at 22 hr.
Repeated Dose Study, 0 or 80 mg/kg, Functional Observational Battery
No behavioral evidence of detrimental effects associated with oral BT-11 treatment were observed over the 2 weeks of treatment or the 1 week post-dosing period. No quantal differences were noted between controls and BT-11-treated rats at any time data were collected. The groups did not differ for the vast majority of categorical comparisons, with the exception of significant differences for the following outcomes: posture at baseline and on day 21 (p=0.0235, p=0.0339, respectively); cage removal ease at baseline (p=0.0285); and response to touch on day 7 (p=0.0285). These differences were likely variations within degrees of normal behavior. For continuous end points, the groups were balanced at baseline, and, at time points after dosing, the groups did not differ. The only exception was a significant difference for rears during the observation period on day 14 (Table 3); least squares mean for dose 0 was greater than the least squares mean for the 80 mg/kg/day dose of BT-11 (p=0.0273). This was a single difference that only appeared once during the course of observations. Furthermore, endpoints that changed with a single dose of 500 mg/kg (Fig 1) were not altered in rats given 14-day treatment with 80 mg/kg/day (Fig 3).
Table 3.
BT-11: Example of a continuous FOB endpoint for male rats given repeated doses of 80 mg/kg BT-11 for 14 days.
FOB Endpoint | Study day | LEAST SQUARES MEANS (95% confidence Interval) for each dose of Treatment | P-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 80 | |||
O_REAR (rears during observation period; n=10 for days 3-14; n=8 for day 21) | 3 | 29.17 (15.83-42.50) | 27.23 (13.90-40.57) | 0.4916 |
7 | 27.97 (14.63-41.30) | 24.33 (11.00-37.67) | 0.1985 | |
14 | 30.27 (16.93-43.60) | 23.93 (10.60-37.27) | 0.0273 | |
21 | 23.17 (9.83-36.50) | 22.23 (8.90-35.57) | 0.7397 |
Figure 3.
Comparison of weight and hind grip in control and BT-11 treated rats before and after initiation of 14 daily oral doses of 80 mg/kg. Day 21 is 7 days after dosing ceased. Values are expressed as mean ± SD, n=8-10. In contrast to what was seen with the 500 mg/kg acute dose (Fig 1), there were no significant differences between control and treated rats.
Repeated Dose Study, 0 or 80 mg/kg, Pathological Assessment
Clinical Pathology and Histopathology: No test article associated lesions were noted in animals administered this agent, and none were seen in the vehicle control group. The conclusion is that no histopathologic evidence of toxic injury was observed in rats given 80 mg/kg/day of BT-11 over a period of 14 days. Clinical pathological examination of blood samples taken at various sacrifice days did not reveal any clinical or statistical differences when samples from control and test rats were compared.
DISCUSSION
The results of behavioral and pathological experiments presented here indicate that BT-11 appears to be well-tolerated when administered orally to adult male rats over 14 days at 80 mg/kg (cumulative dose 1,120 mg/kg) or as a single oral bolus of 500 mg/kg. Experiments were designed to include endpoint determinations 7-14 days after dosing to evaluate reversibility of any detriments. The only statistical difference noted 14 days after treatment ended was a weight difference of <4% when the high bolus dose was given, even though weight differences were not evident until that time nor did weight differences appear between control and treated rats given multiple 80 mg/kg doses of BT-11.
Although clinical pathology endpoints suggestive of transient liver effects were noted in early (2-4 days post-dosing) blood samples collected after bolus oral administration of 500 mg/kg BT-11, no such effects were seen at later time points. Nor were any of these endpoint changes noted when blood samples were collected during or after the repeated dose experiments. Oral administration results in drug in the blood going to the liver before it enters general circulation, where first-pass elimination is possible. In experiments with 500 mg/kg BT-11 the liver was exposed to a bolus, high concentration of the product [15]. This may have contributed to the transient response observed. Note that plasma concentrations of BT-11 at 2 hr after 500 mg/kg were between 3 and 39 ng/mL and concentrations 2 hr after 80 mg/kg were between 12 and 39 ng/mL. The dose of 500 mg/kg was considered very high, as it was over 60x a low effective pharmacological dose for treating IBD in mice (8 mg BT-11/kg/d)[9], and yet it did not cause any long-lasting detriments.
The rat Functional Observation Battery is a thorough and quantitative way to measure behavioral effects of new drugs in intact laboratory animals [14]. It provides numerous time-related endpoints, allowing observers to document changes relevant to general and nervous system specific toxicities. Following oral BT-11 administration, the general appearance and behavior of the rats was normal, and both controls and treated rats gained weight. Biologically significant effects of BT-11 on weight or weight gain, sensitive indicators of general toxicity, were not seen with any of the rats in any of the experiments conducted as part of this study.
For this study, we developed the analytical method for plasma detection of BT-11 and found it useful for detection of plasma concentrations as long as 48 hr after a relatively high efficacious dose (80 mg/kg). We assume that this method can be adaptable for lower plasma concentrations associated with lower dosing paradigms, but studies using the minimal efficacious dose (8 mg/kg) remain to be done. Plasma samples collected after oral administration of 80 mg/kg BT-11 in the present study indicated that it could be orally active and systemically absorbed by this route. Current therapeutic agents used to treat inflammatory bowel diseases, including glucocorticoids for Crohn's disease, may be given orally, locally (by rectal administration), or by the intravenous route [5]. However, even locally applied drugs need some systemic absorption in order to exert anti-inflammatory effects. The PK profile of BT-11 in the present experiments suggests rapid absorption and rapid elimination with the possibility of limited systemic absorption as well as local delivery to the lower gastrointestinal tract, a therapeutic benefit similar to the commonly used IBD treatment, mesalamine [5]. Although the BT-11 used in these experiments was insufficiently soluble to be given IV, future studies are planned after development of a more aqueous soluble formulation so bioavailability can be determined by comparing blood levels after IV and oral dosing.
The analytical method used to analyze plasma concentrations for BT-11 was very sensitive and capable of determining low plasma levels after oral administration during PK experiments. Pharmacokinetic parameters calculated in this study were used to extrapolate useful information. For example, the high apparent Vd, which is greater than blood volume of the test animal, suggests either (1) that the test compound is being distributed outside the blood because a Vd greater than 1 L/kg suggests that the drug could be sequestered in tissue outside of body water, or (2) a considerable amount of the test agent is not being systemically absorbed but is instead being eliminated prior to absorption (e.g., through the liver and/or feces) and acting locally in the gut [15]. The latter possibility is more likely for BT-11 due to the consistent 90% reduction in gut inflammation observed in animal pharmacology studies using three validated mouse models of IBD [9]. Although the product used for these studies was relatively insoluble, a more soluble form of BT-11 is under development so future experiments could provide additional pharmacokinetic data comparing a more soluble BT-11 (given IV, so Cpo does not have to be estimated) and oral BT-11. It is recognized that use of different pharmaceutical preparations, vehicles and/or different concentrations of test compound could have a significant role in the pharmacokinetics of the test agent [16]. Of note, however, is that BT-11 is being proposed as a treatment for CD, where a local effect in the gastrointestinal tract is preferred over high systemic distribution after oral administration.
The overall conclusions from the results presented here is that oral administration of BT-11 to rats leads to relatively rapid but limited absorption from the gastrointestinal tract and relatively rapid removal from the plasma. Furthermore, oral BT-11 administration at the doses tested in the rat did not cause histopathological or behavioral effects.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Supported by the Virginia Biosciences Health Research Corporation and NIH SBIR/STTR funds (1R43DK097940 and 1R41DK099027). The authors also wish to acknowledge Mehdi Ashraf-Khorassani, Chemistry Department, Virginia Tech, for operating the LC-MS/MS.
Footnotes
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Drs. Carbo, Philipson, Hontecillas, Philipson, Gandour, and Bassaganya-Riera were employed by or consulted for Biotherapeutics, Inc. at the time this work was done.
Contributor Information
Philippe Bissel, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061.
Katie Boes, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061.
Jonathan Hinckley, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061.
Bernard S. Jortner, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061
Geraldine Magnin-Bissel, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061.
Stephen R. Werre, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061
Marion Ehrich, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061.
Adria Carbo, Biotherapeutics Inc. (www.biotherapeuticsinc.com), 1800 Kraft Dr., Suite 200, Blacksburg, VA 24060.
Casandra Philipson, Biotherapeutics Inc. (www.biotherapeuticsinc.com), 1800 Kraft Dr., Suite 200, Blacksburg, VA 24060.
Raquel Hontecillas, Biotherapeutics Inc. (www.biotherapeuticsinc.com), 1800 Kraft Dr., Suite 200, Blacksburg, VA 24060.
Noah Philipson, Biotherapeutics Inc. (www.biotherapeuticsinc.com), 1800 Kraft Dr., Suite 200, Blacksburg, VA 24060.
Richard D. Gandour, Biotherapeutics Inc. (www.biotherapeuticsinc.com), 1800 Kraft Dr., Suite 200, Blacksburg, VA 24060
Josep Bassaganya-Riera, Biotherapeutics Inc. (www.biotherapeuticsinc.com), 1800 Kraft Dr., Suite 200, Blacksburg, VA 24060.
REFERENCES
- 1.Stenson WF. Interleukin-4 hyporesponsiveness in inflammatory bowel disease: immune defect or physiological response? Gastroenterology. 1995;108(1):284–286. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(95)90034-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bleyer A, O'Leary M, Barr R, Ries LAG, editors. Cancer Epidemiology in Older Adolescents and Young Adults 15 to 29 Years of Age, Including SEER Incidence and Survival: 1975-2000. National Cancer Institute; Bethesda, MD: 2006. NIH Pub. No. 06-5767. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Camilleri M. GI clinical research 2002-2003: the year in review. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2003;1:415–420. doi: 10.1016/s1542-3565(03)00220-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lichtenstein GR, Abreu M, Present D. Recent Advances in the Treatment of Crohn's Colitis. The Center for Health Care Education, LLC; Killingworth, CT: 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wallace JL, Sharkey KA. Pharmacotherapy of inflammatory bowel disease. In: Brunton L, Chabner B, Knollman B, editors. Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 12th ed. McGraw Hill Medical; New York, NY: 2011. pp. 1351–1362. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lu P, Hontecillas R, Philipson DW, Basssaganya-Riera J. Lanthionine synthetase component C-like protein 2: a new drug target for inflammatory diseases and diabetes. Current Drug Targets. 2014;15(6):565–572. doi: 10.2174/1389450115666140313123714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bassaganya-Riera J, Guri AJ, Lu P, Climent M, et al. Abscisic acid regulates inflammation via ligand-binding domain-independent activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(4):2504–2516. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.160077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.PubChem Chemical Information. URL: http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/247228#section=Top.
- 9.Carbo A, Hontecillas R, Cooper J, Gandour RD, Ehrich M, Bassaganya-Riera J. Lanthionine synthetase C-like receptor 2 (LANCL2): a novel therapeutic target for inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2015;148(4):S686–S687. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lu P, Hontecillas R, Horne WT, et al. Computational modeling-based discovery of novel classes of anti-inflammatory drugs that target lanthionine synthetase C-like protein 2. PlosOne. 2012;7(4):e34643. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Denny KH, Stewart DW. Acute, sub-acute, sub-chronic and chronic general toxicity testing for preclinical drug development. In: Faqi AS, editor. A Comprehensive Guide to Toxicology in Preclinical Drug Development. Elsevier; Amsterdam: 2013. pp. 87–105. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (FDA CDER) Guidance for Industry M3(R2) Nonclinical Safety Studies for the Conduct of Human Clinical Trials and Marketing Authorization for Pharmaceuticals. 2010 Jan; URL: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/guidances/ucm073246.pdf. [PubMed]
- 13.Zhang Y, Huo M, Zhou J, Xie S. PKSolver: an add-in program for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics data analysis in Microsoft Excel. Comp. Methods Programs Biomed. 2010;99:306–314. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Moser VC. Neurobehavioral screening in rodents. In: Maines MD, editor. Current Protocols in Toxicology. John Wiley & Sons; New York, NY: 1999. pp. 11.2.1–11.2.16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Holford NHG. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: rational dosing and the time course of drug action. In: Katzung BG, Trevor AJ, editors. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology. 13th ed. McGraw Hill Education; New York, NY: 2015. pp. 41–55. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Stegemann S, Leveiller F, Franchi D, de Jong H, Linden H. When poor solubility becomes an issue: from early stage to proof of concept. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 31:249–261. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2007.05.110. 1007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]