Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson. 2012 Oct 29;225:115–119. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2012.10.006

HyperSPASM NMR: A New Approach to Single-Shot 2D Correlations on DNP-Enhanced Samples

Kevin J Donovan 1, Lucio Frydman 1,*
PMCID: PMC5035685  EMSID: EMS69970  PMID: 23159821

Abstract

Dissolution DNP experiments are limited to a single or at most a few scan, before the non-Boltzmann magnetization has been. This makes it impractical to record 2D NMR data by conventional, t1-incremented schemes. Here a new approach termed HyperSPASM to establish 2D heteronuclear correlations in a single scan is reported, aimed at dealing with this kind of challenge. The HyperSPASM experiment relies on imposing an amplitude-modulation of the data by a single Δt1 indirect-domain evolution time, and subsequently monitoring the imparted encoding on separate echo and the anti-echo pathway signals within a single continuous acquisition. This is implemented via the use of alternating, switching, coherence selection gradients. As a result of these manipulations the phase imparted by a heteronucleus over its indirect domain evolution can be accurately extracted, and 2D data unambiguously reconstructed with a single-shot excitation. The nature of this sequence makes the resulting experiment particularly well suited for the collecting indirectly-detected HSQC data on hyperpolarized samples. The potential of the ensuing “HyperSPASM” method is exemplified with natural-abundance hyperpolarized correlations on model systems.

Keywords: 2D NMR, Dissolution DNP, hyperpolarization, heteronuclear correlations, Ultrafast NMR

1. Introduction

By establishing unambiguous connectivity, two-dimensional (2D) NMR conveys unique information about a molecule’s structure and dynamics at an atomic resolution. 2D NMR correlations typically require a full sampling of two time-domains according to Nyquist criteria [12]; as one of these domains involves a t1 delay within a pulse sequence, this necessitates multiple repetitions and extended experimental timescales. Numerous proposals have emerged to reduce these acquisition times, including sparse sampling techniques [38] and other non-Fourier methods [910]. Although facilitating higher-throughput and faster high-D NMR spectroscopy, these approaches still do not eliminate the necessity for collecting multiple scans. Such requirement for multiple acquisitions complicates the prospects of combining 2D NMR with dissolution Dynamic Nuclear Polarization (DNP) [1113]. Dissolution DNP is a promising emerging technique [14], whereby a hyperpolarized spin state is created in a cryogenic solid and then suddenly melted so as to exploit it for a dramatic sensitivity enhancement in solution NMR or MRI. This hyperpolarization, however, decays with the longitudinal relaxation time T1, and it cannot be preserved at the level of constancy normally demanded by conventional 2D NMR acquisitions. By contrast, ultrafast 2D techniques that rely on spatio-temporal encodings to monitor the indirect-domain evolution [1516], have been shown capable of making full use of this hyperpolarization [1719]. While spatio-temporal methods can deliver 2D NMR spectra in a single scan without a priori knowledge, they face a number of technical limitations. Most prominent among these is the signal-to-noise penalty associated with having to acquire data along two spectral dimensions simultaneously. Given that the per-scan noise in these methods increases as the root of the number of elements along F1, this may be particularly onerous when this axis involves nuclei that, like 13C, are associated with sharp resonances spanning a wide frequency range. This Communication presents an alternative for acquiring single-shot 2D hyperpolarized data, Single-Point Amplitude-Separated Multi-dimensional (SPASM) NMR, that is specifically designed to bypass these limitations and to maximize the sensitivity enhancement provided by dissolution DNP.

The SPASM approach draws from two previous developments in the area of accelerated multidimensional acquisitions. One of these is single-point evaluation of the evolution dimension (SPEED) spectroscopy [20], where correlations among resolved chemical sites are sought from the phase shift imparted on F2 peaks when 2D data are acquired for a known Δt1 t1-value. This information can be exploited owing to the defined distortions that this F1 evolution will introduce on the I(F2) shape of peaks along the direct domain, as given by

S(t1,F2)exp(2πiF1Δt1).I(F2).exp[2πi(ϕ0+F2ϕ1)] (1)

Although well-defined, notice that an ambiguity remains in this determination owing to the last term in eq. 1, involving the constant and linear phase distortions ϕ0, ϕ1 of common occurrence in 1D NMR. In order to remove these unknowns while preserving the experiment’s single-shot character, we propose to incorporate onto it a second development from the 2D NMR literature: the switched acquisition time (SWAT) experiment [21]. Originally proposed for the simultaneous collection of N- and P-type 2D COSY data, this method operates by imposing an initial coherence-selection encoding gradient during t1, and subsequently interleaving coherence selection decoding gradients between sampled points in t2. Moreover, following the decoding of the first t2-point, each of these coherence decoding gradients is applied with a strength corresponding to twice the action of the initial coherence encoding; this allows one to “jump” from echo- to anti-echo acquisition FIDs between consecutively sampled data point.

Combining the principles underlying these two techniques, SPEED and SWAT, along the guidelines shown in Fig. 1, allows one to resolve the indirect-dimension ambiguity remaining in eq. 1 within a single-scan sequence. Indeed, even if constrained to a single t1 value Δt1, the phase distortions in the resulting acquisition can be summarized as

SN(Δt1,F2)exp(2πiF1Δt1).I(F2).exp[2πi(ϕ0+F2ϕ1)]SP(Δt1,F2)exp(+2πiF1Δt1).I(F2).exp[2πi(ϕ0+F2ϕ1ΔtSWAT))] (2)

where ΔtSWAT is the delay between N and P’s initial acquisition time. Given that this delay is known, the difference required by each F2-peak of N- and P-spectra for achieving its correct phasing:

Δϕ(F2)=tan1[im(SP)/re(SP)]tan1[im(SN)/re(SN)]=4πF1Δt1+F2ΔtSWAT (3)

can ascertain the F1 offset to be correlated with this peak –all while remaining in a single-shot acquisition mode and without incurring in the sensitivity penalties of space-encoded ultrafast NMR.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

HyperSPASM pulse sequence for establishing single-shot 2D heteronuclear correlations on DNP-enhanced samples. A single-t1 (Δt1) 2D heteronuclear sequence –with full and open rectangles representing π/2 and π pulses, dashed rectangles denoting broadband decoupling, and τ = 1/(4JCH) set by one-bond heteronuclear couplings– establishes the 13C-1H correlations. The absolute phase evolution imparted by Δt1 is unravelled by the independent, single-shot monitoring of echo and anti-echo (N, P) modulations as aided by pulsed GZ gradients. The sequence includes a GX,GY-BIRD element [22] to suppress background signals from 12C bonded protons, and thereby enable the acquisition of 13C-decoupled direct domain line shapes that can be independently and reliably phased to pure absorption. An initial twilight {1H}13C spectrum is also acquired using a low flip-angle pulse before the acquisition, as an aid to remove potential folding artifacts in F1.

2. Experimental Methods

The usefulness of HyperSPASM was explored within the context of ex situ DNP. Such dissolution DNP experiments are well suited for heteronuclear correlations whereby the slowly-relaxing 13C nuclei are hyperpolarized, and then monitored indirectly in correlation with J-coupled protons having a higher detection sensitivity. The HyperSPASM experiment thus assayed (Fig. 1) resembles a reversal of the traditional HETCOR sequence [23]. Notice as well that a small-tip-angle 13C “twilight” 1D acquisition is collected as complement to SPASM, and is meant to provide an unambiguous accounting of all the 13C positions expected along the F1 domain.

Samples were hyperpolarized in an Oxford Hypersense polarizer (Tubney Woods, UK) for 5 hours (pyridine) and 3.25 hours (indazole). Pyridine was hyperpolarized by BDPA radicals at ≈40 mM with an equal volume of d6-DMSO. Indazole was hyperpolarized in a 1:1 solution of d6-DMSO/sulfolane with 40 mM BDPA [24]. Approximately 4 mL of methanol-d4 were used to dissolve both samples. The encoding gradient following the indirect evolution delay (Δt1) was set to 20 G/cm, which then determined the decode gradient immediately before SWAT acquisition by the ratio (ɣ C/ɣ H) to be approximately 5 G/cm and the SWAT acquisition gradients to be approximately 10 G/cm. All of the aforementioned coherence selection gradients were applied for a length of 200 µs. The y and z gradients used in the GBIRD element had amplitude 30 G/cm and a length of 400 µs. The HyperSPASM experiment shown in Figure 1 was repeated for 2 transients (where the 13C twilight acquisition was collected only on the first transient) to achieve complete suppression of the 12C-bonded protons, where the phase of the 90-degree carbon pulse preceding Δt1 was inverted and the resulting signals were subtracted by alternating the receiver phase. As an additional step to achieve background signal suppression, the correlation sequence was preceded by a 90-degree pulse on the 1H channel followed by an approximately 13.3 G/cm gradient on the PFG X-axis channel for a duration of 1 ms, to saturate any initial 1H magnetization such that it would not contribute to the detected signal.

3. Results

To better visualize the workings of the resulting scheme, Figure 2 illustrates SPASM’s operation for a heteronuclear correlation in a model compound. Notice the phase-wrapping that naturally occurs as the F1 offset exceeds ±0.5/Δt1; it follows from plots of this type that Δt1 not only imposes this frequency range but also ΔF1’s resolution limit. According to repetitive SPASM measurements and their ensuing P/N-phasing, we estimate this random uncertainty at ca. 0.015/Δt1.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Experimental demonstration of SPASM’s ability to measure indirect-domain evolution frequencies, illustrated for a model Chloroform case whose 13C offset was systematically shifted over 2 kHz in 100 Hz steps for a fixed indirect evolution delay Δt1 = 1 ms. (A) Post-acquisition processing involves separating the experimental data into alternating points corresponding to N (echo) and P (anti-echo) FIDs. Once individually Fourier transformed and phased to yield purely-absorptive 1D spectra, each peak leads to the phase parameters ϕN,i and ϕP,i from which the indirect frequency can be determined (eq. 2). (B) Phase difference exhibited by CHCl3’s sole 1H resonance when acted upon by the SP-SWAT sequence as a function of an artificially-varying indirect frequency offset F1. Green data points illustrate the periodic phase wrapping arising from the limits on a measurable phase difference Δϕ = ϕN-ϕp; phase-unwrapping yields the blue points, in excellent fit with the prediction of eq. 3.

Figure 3 illustrates the ensuing results for pyridine and for indazole. Notice that with a suitable placing of the RF channel’s offsets in the center of the corresponding spectra, the experiment had no difficulties in correlating each 1H/13C coupled pair while monitoring free evolution data –this, despite the latter shifts spanning nearly 3 kHz in F1. The single-shot correlation shows excellent agreement with HSQC [25] data acquired and processed [26] in a conventional manner. The 13C “twilight” 1D acquisition further validates the genuine frequencies of all indirect-domain peaks from SPASM data. Still, it is interesting to note certain systematic deviations between the positions of the 13C peaks observed by this pre-acquisition scan and the SPASM predictions for all peaks that were analyzed. We ascribe these deviations to minor timing errors in the implementation of the gradient’s and pulse’s waveforms, whose exact value was unknown and therefore ignored in the F1-domain estimations.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

HyperSPASM correlations established for natural-abundance pyridine (left) and indazole (right). The 2D correlations generated by the pulse sequence (upper panels) arise from phasing the illustrated 1D traces – N/echo spectrum in red, P/anti-echo spectrum in blue. Each of these was collected using the sequence in Fig. 1, N= 256 acquisition loops, Δt1= 150 µs, and two phase-cycled transients for an optimal suppression of the 12C-bonded protons (important to retrieve reliable phased data). Shown in the lower 2D panels are conventional HSQC spectra acquired with 256 t1 increments. HyperSPASM data were acquired at sample concentrations of ≈3 mM for pyridine and 20 mM for indazole, the HSQCs stem from concentrated (approximately 25% pyridine, 1 M indazole) samples. The 1D spectra (bottom) compare the predicted F1 peak locations calculated from eq. 3 (violet) against the experimental DNP-enhanced twilight 13C data (black); widths in the calculated peaks reflect the phasing uncertainty, translated into Hz.

To further assess the experimental sensitivity benefit incurred from the dissolution DNP process, the results obtained with HyperSPASM were compared with results obtained on the same sample after spins have returned to thermal equilibrium. Both experiments used the pulse sequence in Figure 1 (without the twilight 13C acquisition), and the latter was repeated for 512 transients. Figure 4 presents this control, and reveals ca. 670x and 120x average enhancements for P/N acquisitions on pyridine and indazole dissolutions, respectively. When factoring in the additional γHC sensitivity afforded by these 1H-detected experiments it follows that nearly very modest sensitivity penalties over the conventionally detected 1D DNP-enhanced 13C experiment results –despite the more complex nature of the used pulse sequence and the 2D correlated information arising thereof. Also interesting to note is the 180° phase shift differences characterizing all peaks in the hyperpolarized vs the thermal spectra illustrated in Figure 4; given the identical pulse sequences that were utilized to collect these two data sets, we ascribe this difference to the opposing states of 13C polarization that characterized the initial states in these experiments.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Comparing SPASM’s sequence performance on DNP-enhanced samples (one post-twilight scan - top) vs the same sequence executed after spins have returned to their thermal equilibrium (bottom), for both pyridine (A) and indazole (B). We ascribe the ≈180˚ phase difference between hyperpolarized and thermal spectra to the differing initial conditions of the starting 13C polarization.

4. Discussion and Conclusions

This study introduced a new approach to establish 2D NMR correlations, whereby single-delay phase distortions can be translated into F1 shifts. This can be attained in a single scan by the simultaneous acquisition of the echo and anti-echo sets arising from amplitude-modul0ated data involving a single Δt1 time. The experiment is unequivocal and accurate, providing a convenient platform for extracting DNP-enhanced 2D correlations. Being free from the need to fully sample two domains in a single scan, the acquired spectra also promise remarkable signal-to-noise improvements vis-à-vis ultrafast 2D NMR. This technique could thereby be advantageously extended beyond its integration of DNP and into other kinds of time-pressed experiments, like the monitoring of real time chemical processes at seconds or sub-second timescales [27]. Despite all these promises, this technology still faces a number of basic limitations related to the extraction of frequencies from a single time point. One of these relates to folding/phase-wrapping ambiguities, which can usually be alleviated by adding the aforementioned 1D “twilight” measurement. Another limitation stems from the inter-relation between the spectral width that can be characterized in F1, and the accuracy of these characterizations –both of which end up defined by the same parameter Δt1. Arguably, however, the most constraining limitation stems from the requirement that all peaks of interest be resolved along the direct dimension. In effect, should one F2 peak be correlated to multiple F1 sites, phasing such resonance into a reliable purely-absorptive line shape from which a definite F1 offset value could be read from the ϕN and ϕP parameters, does not appear feasible. For large complex molecules like proteins, or for multi-site homonuclear correlation experiments such as TOCSY, the sequence in Figure 1 would seem of little use. The use of additional manipulations, however, could help alleviate this problem. One could envision, for instance, incorporating additional coherence-selecting gradients encoding supplementary Δt1 values, from which the ensuing ambiguities could be resolved. Research to solving this matter and exploring its applications, are currently in progress.

Highlights.

  • A new approach to establish 2D hetero-correlations in a single scan is reported

  • The method imposes amplitude modulations during an indirect-domain evolution delay, and subsequently monitors the effects of these encodings on separate echo and the anti-echo signals.

  • The potential of the ensuing “HyperSPASM” method is exemplified with HSQC-type correlations on model hyperpolarized samples

Acknowledgments

The authors thank L. Casabianca, C. Bretschneider and T. Harris for assistance in the DNP experiments, and to E. Kupce for programming insight. Financial support from Agilent Technologies (Research Gift #2305), ERC Advanced Grant #246754, EU’S BioNMR Grant #261863, and the generosity of the Perlman Family Foundation, are also acknowledged.

References

  • [1].Jeener J. lecture presented at Ampere International Summer School II. Basko Polje, Yugoslavia: 1971. [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Ernst RR, Bodenhausen G, Wokaun A. Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in One and Two Dimensions. Oxford University Press; 1987. [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Hoch JC, Stern AC. NMR Data Processing. John Wiley and Sons, Inc; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Chen J, De Angelis AA, Mandelshtam VA, Shaka AJ. Progress on the two-dimensional filter diagonalization mehod. An efficient doubling scheme for two-dimensional constant-time NMR. J Magn Reson. 2003;162:74–89. doi: 10.1016/s1090-7807(03)00045-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Kupce E, Freeman R. Projection-reconstruction technique for speeding up multidimensional NMR spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:6429–6440. doi: 10.1021/ja049432q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Hiller S, Fiorito F, Wuthrich K, Wider G. Automated Projection Spectroscopy (APSY) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:10876–10881. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504818102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Kazimierczuk K, Stanek J, Zawadzka-Kazimierczuk A, Koźmiński W. Random sampling in multidimensional NMR spectroscopy. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc. 2010;57:420–434. doi: 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2010.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Orekhov VY, Jaravine VA. Analysis of non-uniformly sampled spectra with multi-dimensional decomposition. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc. 2011;59:271–292. doi: 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2011.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Kupce E, Freeman R. Two-dimensional Hadamard spectroscopy. J Mag Reson. 2003;162:300–310. doi: 10.1016/s1090-7807(02)00196-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Kim S, Szyperski T. GFT NMR, a new approach to rapidly obtain precise high-dimensional NMR spectral information. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:1385–1393. doi: 10.1021/ja028197d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Bowen S, Zeng H, Hilty C. Chemical shift correlations from hyperpolarized NMR by off-resonance decoupling. Anal Chem. 2008;80:5794–5798. doi: 10.1021/ac8004567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Ludwig C, Marin-Montesinos I, Saunders MG, Gunther UL. Optimizing the polarization matrix for ex situ dynamic nuclear polarization. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:2508–2509. doi: 10.1021/ja909984w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Zeng H, Bowen S, Hilty C. Sequentially acquired two-dimensional NMR spectra from hyperpolarized sample. J Magn Reson. 2009;199:159–165. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2009.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Ardenkjær-Larsen JH, Fridlund B, Gram A, Hansson G, Hansson L, Lerche MH, Servin R, Thaning M, Golman K. Increase in signal-to-noise ratio of >10,000 times in liquid-state NMR. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:10158–10163. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1733835100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Also, see the themed issue on Dynamic Nuclear Polarization, Phys. Chem Chem Phys. 2010;12
  • [15].Frydman L, Scherf T, Lupulescu A. The acquisition of multidimensional NMR spectra within a single scan. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:15858–15862. doi: 10.1073/pnas.252644399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Mishkovsky M, Frydman L. Principles and progress in Ultrafast multidimensional nuclear magnetic resonance. Annu Rev Phys Chem. 2009;60:429–448. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physchem.040808.090420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Frydman L, Blazina D. Ultrafast two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of hyperpolarized solutions. Nature Physics. 2007;3:415–419. [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Mishkovsky M, Frydman L. Progress in hyperpolarized Ultrafast 2D NMR spectroscopy. ChemPhysChem. 2008;9:2340–2348. doi: 10.1002/cphc.200800461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Giraudeau P, Shrot Y, Frydman L. Multiple ultrafast, broadband 2D NMR spectra of hyperpolarized natural products. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:13902–13903. doi: 10.1021/ja905096f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Kupce E, Freeman R. SPEED: single-point evaluation of the evolution dimension. Magn Reson Chem. 2007;45:711–713. [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Hurd RE, John BK, Plant HD. Novel method for detection of pure-phase, double-absorption lineshapes in gradient-enhanced spectroscopy. J Magn Reson. 1991;93:666–670. [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Emetarom C, Hwang TL, Mackin G, Shaka AJ. Isotope editing of NMR spectra. Excitation sculpting using BIRD pulses. J Magn Reson. 1995;115:137–140. [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Freeman R, Morris GA. Experimental chemical shift correlation maps in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Chem Soc Chem Comm. 1978:684–686. [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Lumata L, Ratnakar SJ, Jindal R, Merritt M, Comment A, Malloy C, Sherry AD, Kovacs Z. BDPA: An efficient polarizing agent for fast dissolution dynamic nuclear polarization NMR spectroscopy. Chem Eur J. 2011;17:10825–10827. doi: 10.1002/chem.201102037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Bodenhausen G, Ruben DJ. Natural abundance nitrogen-15 NMR by enhanced heteronuclear spectroscopy. Chem Phys Lett. 1980;69:185–189. [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Delaglio F, Grzesiek S, Vuister G, Zhu G, Pfeifer J, Bax A. NMRPipe: A multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes. J Biomol NMR. 1995;6:277–293. doi: 10.1007/BF00197809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Gal M, Mishkovsky M, Frydman L. Real-time monitoring of chemical transformations by Ultrafast 2D NMR spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:951–956. doi: 10.1021/ja0564158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES