Abstract
TRPV1 is a polymodal nociceptor for diverse physical and chemical stimuli that interact with different parts of the channel protein. Recent cryo-EM studies revealed detailed channel structures, opening the door for mapping structural elements mediating activation by each stimulus. Towards this goal, here we have combined unstructured peptide-insertion screening (UPS) with electrophysiological and fluorescence recordings to explore structural and functional roles of the intracellular regions of TRPV1 in mediating various activation stimuli. We found that most of the tightly packed protein regions did not tolerate structural perturbation by UPS when tested, indicating that structural integrity of the intracellular region is critical. In agreement with previous reports, Ca2+-dependent desensitization is strongly dependent on both intracellular N- and C-terminal domains; insertions of an unstructured peptide between these domains and the transmembrane core domain nearly eliminated Ca2+-dependent desensitization. In contrast, channel activations by capsaicin, low pH, divalent cations, and even heat are mostly intact in mutant channels containing the same insertions. These observations suggest that the transmembrane core domain of TRPV1, but not the intracellular domains, is responsible for sensing these stimuli.
TRPV1 ion channel can be directly activated or modulated by capsaicin1, heat1, extracellular proton2, divalent cations3, Na+ 4, peptide toxins from spider5, centipede6, and scorpion7, membrane depolarization8, intracellular Ca2+ 9, and many other factors10. A noticeable feature of TRPV1 polymodal activation emerging from biophysical investigations is the existence of non-overlapping activation pathways11,12,13. However, except for capsaicin14,15,16,17,18,19, proton11,20, and animal toxins6,21, the channel structures that sense activation stimuli are poorly defined. Recent cryo-EM studies revealed that the transmembrane core domain of TRPV1 resembles that of tetrameric cation channels, with six transmembrane helical segments surrounding a centrally located ion permeation pore22,23. The partially resolved intracellular N- and C-terminal domains contain special structures such as the ankyrin-like repeat domains and the TRP domain that likely play crucial structural and/or functional roles10. Arrangement of intracellular domains has been investigated using fluorescence resonance energy transfer24. A major task for TRPV1 study in the post-structure era is to assign functional roles to individual structure domains.
The unstructured peptide-insertion screening (UPS) strategy had been used to rapidly and reliably obtain information on structure-function relationships in an ion channel even before detailed protein structures were available. In one effective application, isolating the pore domain of yeast TRPY1 channel from the intracellular Ca2+-sensing domain with unstructured peptides demonstrated that the pore domain was mechanosensitive25. Similarly, unstructured peptide insertion was used to perturb functional coupling between channel pore and the intracellular Ca2+-binding domains of the BK channel26. More recently, this strategy was applied to the study of TREK-1 potassium channel, which is highly temperature-sensitive like TRPV127. Introducing an unstructured triple-glycine peptide between the M4 segment and the C terminus was found to eliminate high temperature-sensitivity, supporting the idea that the C-terminus of TREK-1 is responsible for sensing temperature change28. In these studies, insertion of a short, unstructured peptide was used to perturb coupling between two rigid channel domains. With the guidance of detailed structural information, unstructured peptides can also be introduced into a rigid domain to disrupt its structural integrity and test its functional contribution. In the present study, we applied the UPS approach to TRPV1 intracellular domains to explore their structural role and functional contribution to polymodal activation.
Materials and Methods
Molecular biology and transfection
The mouse TRPV1 was used in this study; its amino acid numbers differ from the rat TRPV1, another commonly used version, mostly by one—for example, Y511 in mTRPV1 corresponds to Y512 in rTRPV1. Channel cDNA was constructed into mammalian expression vector pEYFP-N3 as described previously29, which led to an eYFP tag fused in frame to the C-terminal end of the mTRPV1 cDNA. Site-directed insertion mutagenesis was performed using either QuikChange II mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) according to the manufacturer’s instruction or the standard overlap extension PCR method. All mutations were verified by sequencing. HEK293 cells were cultured in a DMEM medium supplemented with 10% FBS, 2 mM glutamine, 1% (v/v) non-essential amino acids, at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Cells were plated on 0.1 mg/ml poly-D-lysine coated glass coverslips 24 h before transfection to improve cell adhesion during subsequent imaging and patch recordings. HEK293 cells were transfected with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) following standard protocols. Imaging studies and patch-clamp recordings were performed 24-to-48 h after transfection.
Confocal imaging
Cellular distribution of expressed TRPV1 wild-type and mutants were examined using confocal microscopy. The Airyscan mode of Zeiss LSM880 controlled by the ZEN software (version 2.1 black) was used to achieve super-resolutions up to 140 nm. Laser irradiation at 458 nm and 514 nm was used to excite eYFP linked to the channel and the plasma membrane marker di-8-ANEPPS, respectively. A 40X oil immersion lens with a 1.30 numerical aperture was used. eYFP was imaged with a main beam splitter at 458/514 nm and a 495–550 nm band pass emission filter. Di-8-ANEPPS was imaged with a main beam splitter at 458 nm and a 570 nm long pass emission filter.
Calcium imaging
Transiently transfected HEK293 cells seeded on 25 mm coverslips were washed twice with an extracellular solution (ECS) containing 140 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1.8 mM CaCl2, 10 mM glucose, and 15 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), followed by incubation in 2 ml of ECS supplemented with 2 μM Fluo-4/AM (Kd for Ca2+ at 345 nM) and 0.05% Pluronic F-127 (both from Molecular Probes) at room temperature for 60 min. Probenecid (2 mM) was included in all solutions to prevent Fluo-4 leakage from cells. At the end of incubation, cells were washed three times with ECS and incubated in the same solution for another 20 min at room temperature to complete the intracellular hydrolysis process of the AM ester, which converts the non-fluorescent Fluo-4/AM into the fluorescent version Fluo-4.
Coverslip with dye-loaded cells was placed in the quick-release magnetic chamber (Warner) and mounted on the stage of a Nikon Eclipse TE2000-U microscope system equipped with a Roper Cascade 128B CCD camera. Fluo-4 was excited by an Argon laser with a filter set of z488/10 (excitation), z488rdc (dichroic) and recorded through an emission filter HQ500lp (all from Chroma). The duration of light exposure was controlled by a computer-driven mechanical shutter (Uniblitz). Cell images were acquired sequentially with an exposure period of 200 ms at an interval of 1 s. The shutter and the camera were controlled and synchronized by MetaMorph software (Universal Imaging). Cells pretreated with 1 μM thapsigargin during the dye-loading step (aiming to deplete ER Ca2+ store) did not exhibit noticeable difference in fluorescence intensity or kinetics compared to untreated cells. Change in fluorescence intensity, ΔF, was calculated as the difference between the equilibrium level before and after stimulation.
Electrophysiology
Patch-clamp recordings were performed with an EPC10 amplifier (HEKA) driven by PatchMaster software (HEKA). Patch pipettes were pulled from borosilicate glass and fire-polished to a resistance of 2–5 МΩ. The membrane potential was held at 0 mV, and currents were elicited by a protocol consisting of a 300-ms step to +80 mV followed by a 200-ms step to −80 mV at 1-s intervals. The steady-state current amplitude was normally measured at +80 mV. For inside-out or outside-out patch recordings, both pipette solution and bath solution contained 130 mM NaCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, and 3 mM Hepes (pH 7.2). In experiments recording Ca2+-dependent desensitization of TPRV1 using whole-cell patch configuration, 2 mM CaCl2 was added to both solutions and EGTA was omitted. Current signals were filtered at 2.9 kHz and sampled at 10 kHz. Solution switching was achieved with a rapid solution changer RSC-200 (Biological Science Instruments).
Temperature control
Temperature control for both calcium imaging and patch clamping was achieved by perfusion of preheated solutions as described previously13. Briefly, solutions were heated with an SHM-828 eight-line heater controlled by a CL-100 temperature controller (Harvard Apparatus). The patch pipette was placed about 1 mm from the solution output ports. Local temperature was accurately monitored by a BAT-12 thermometer with ultrafine thermocouple probe (Physitemp) placed right next to the pipette. The thermometer’s temperature readout was fed into an analog input of the patch amplifier and recorded simultaneously with current in patch clamp recordings. For calcium imaging, MetaMorph software was synchronized with PatchMaster software to record temperature simultaneously with imaging. When the experimental temperature was not controlled, recordings were conducted at room temperature at ~24 °C.
Data analysis
Analysis of electrophysiological data was done with PatchMaster and Igor. When necessary, a digital filter was applied to the saved current traces. The capsaicin concentration-dependent activation curves were fit to a Hill equation to obtain the EC50 value and the slope factor. Imaging analysis was done with MetaMorph.
Heat sensitivity was evaluated with two approaches. In the first approach, the slope of heat-dependent current activation was quantified by an R value that was calculated as R = (I2/I1)(10/(T2−T1)), in which T1 is the threshold temperature, T2 = T1 + 5 °C, and I1 and I2 are current amplitude at T1 and T2, respectively30. In the second approach, current activated by heating to 43 °C was normalized to the peak current activated by 10 μM capsaicin at RT and designated as Iheat/ICap. When the current started to inactivate before reaching 43 °C, Iheat was measured at the peak current, resulting in an underestimate of the relative amplitude of the heat-induced activation.
To quantify the temperature threshold for heat activation, the current raising phase was plotted as a function of temperature. The current-temperature relationship of TRPV1 usually exhibited two major phases. The first slow phase represented mostly temperature-dependent increase in the leak current (R value of ~1.7), whereas the second rapid takeoff phase represented heat-induced TRPV1 channel activation. The activation threshold temperature was defined as the intersect point of liner fits to these two phases30.
Rosetta structural modeling
Homology-membrane-symmetry-loop modeling of the pore-forming domain of TRPV1 channel was performed using the Rosetta method31. Coordinates of S1-S5, Pore helix, and S6, were taken from TRPV1 channel structures (PDB ID: 3J5P and 3J5R) and kept rigid during modeling. The loop regions between S2 and S3 in each subunit of the tetramer were modeled de novo. During the first round of modeling, Rosetta’s cyclic coordinate descent (CCD) loop relax protocol32 was used and the top 20 cluster center models were passed to the second round. During the second to third rounds of modeling, kinematic loop relax protocol (KIC)33 was used and the top 20 cluster center models were passed to the next round. During the rest rounds of modeling, kinematic loop relax protocol was used and the top 20 models by score were passed to the next round. From 10,000 to 20,000 models were generated in each round. The models shown here represent the 20 lowest energy models from the last round of iterative loop relax.
Statistics
All statistical data are given as mean ± SEM. Student’s t-test was applied to examine the statistical significance. *, **, ***, and n.s. denote P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001, and not significant, respectively.
Results
Screening TRPV1 intracellular domains with unstructured peptide insertion
Guided by the TRPV1 cryo-EM structures22,23, we have identified a series of intracellular sites for UPS tests (Fig. 1A,B). Our strategy was to focus on key structural domains as well as junctions between domains. After expressing the sixteen insertion mutants in HEK293 cells, we first conducted confocal imaging to examine the distribution of eYFP-tagged channel proteins. While it is well-known that transient over-expression often leads to a large amount of protein trapped inside the cell, we observed in most cases clear plasma membrane distribution of fluorescence (Fig. 2). To confirm the location of fluorescence signal, a plasma membrane marker, di-8-ANEPPS (a gift from the Santana lab), was used to label the same cells (Fig. 2A). Overlap of channel-eYFP and di-8-ANEPPS signals was seen only at the plasma membrane, suggesting proper trafficking of the mutant channels. Two exceptions, H365_3aa and Q561_4aa, were identified, for which the fluorescence signal was evenly distributed across the cell (Fig. 2B).
Functional tests of insertion mutants
We conducted both Ca2+-imaging and patch-clamp recording from each of the insertion mutants. A summary of these characterizations is provided below and in Fig. 3, followed by detailed discussions of key insertions.
The N-terminal region
TRPV1 N-terminus contains an ankyrin-like repeat domain whose crystal structure and functional role have been subjected to intensive investigations34,35,36. The ankyrin-like repeat domain is linked to the first transmembrane segment (S1) by a 77-amino-acid segment thought to be the heat sensor37 (colored blue in Fig. 1A,C). A noticeable structural element within this segment is the anti-parallel β-hairpin pointing to the ankyrin-like repeat domain of a neighboring subunit (Fig. 1C). It is anticipated that this unique structure may provide crucial coupling between adjacent subunits22. To test this attractive idea, we inserted a short unstructured peptide either before or after the β-hairpin. Functional tests revealed that channel-expressing cells did not respond to 10 μM capsaicin, pH 4.6, or 130 mM Mg2+, indicating that the mutant channels were non-functional. Our observations are supportive of a crucial structural/functional role of the β-hairpin structure.
Another insertion mutation was made at the junction between the N-terminus and S1 (Fig. 1A,C, green) that, together with the TRP domain (discussed below), couples intracellular domains to the transmembrane core domain. To perturb this coupling, a triple-glycine peptide was introduced at the turn between S1 and its preceding helical segment. We found that this mutant channel, named F430_3aa, was functional.
S2-S3 linker
The structure of S2-S3 linker was not modeled in the previous cryo-EM study, though the corresponding electron density of this linker was clearly observed22. When an eight-amino-acid peptide was inserted here (Fig. 1D), the channel, named L504_8aa, was functional.
S4-S5 linker
The S4-S5 linker forms a horizontal helix connecting the peripheral S1-S4 domain to the central pore domain22. Recent studies confirmed that it serves a critical role in coupling capsaicin binding to channel activation16,17,18,19. We made a series of insertions of 2-to-12 amino acids in length into this key structure, at three different positions (Fig. 1E). Functional tests however showed that none of these channels could respond to capsaicin, low pH, or Mg2+, though the proteins appeared to be expressed in plasma membrane (Fig. 2B). Therefore, it is clear that a rigid structure of S4-S5 linker is required for channel function.
The C-terminal region
Except for two isolated segments, the structure for most of the C-terminus is unavailable22. One of the resolved structures is a short β-strand that runs parallel to the β-hairpin mentioned above to form a β-sheet between adjacent subunits. Our insertion experiments on the N-terminal side (Fig. 1C) already indicated that this unique structure plays an important role in channel structure/function. The other resolved structure is the anterior C-terminal segment right after S6. Here the TRP domain is conserved among many TRP channels and key to channel function38,39. This segment forms a continuous helix that is sandwiched between the S4-S5 linker and pre-S1 segment22. We made four insertions at two separate positions (Fig. 1F), out of which only one, named E693_8aa, was functional. The insertion was made at the “turn” between S6 and the TRP domain, where the structure exhibits the relaxed π-helix character. Interestingly, insertion of a longer (12 amino acids) peptide at this same position resulted in non-functional channel. Likewise, the two insertions within the helical structure of S6 resulted in non-functional channels.
No noticeable effect of functional insertions on channel activation by capsaicin, low pH, or Mg2+
To assess the impact of unstructured peptide insertion at intracellular sites to channel function, we used live-cell fluorescence imaging to record intracellular Ca2+ increases upon activation of TRPV1, a non-selective cation channel with high Ca2+-permeability1. Control experiment with cells expressing the wild-type channels showed that, upon adding capsaicin, there was a rapid increase of the intracellular fluorescence intensity that reached peak level in a couple of seconds (Fig. 4). No increase in fluorescence intensity could be observed from untransfected cells, or cells over-expressing any of the non-functional insertion mutant channels.
Interestingly, cells expressing each of the functional insertion mutants exhibited a fluorescence increase very similar in time course to that of the wild-type channels (Fig. 4). These observations indicated that unstructured peptide insertions in these mutant channels—all at the interface between the transmembrane domain and the intracellular domains—had a minor effect on capsaicin activation. This is particularly interesting for L504_8aa, which contains an eight-amino-acid peptide insertion at the S2-S3 linker just a few amino acids upstream from Y512 and S513, two key residues whose mutations are known to substantially affect capsaicin activation14,16. Because the structure of the S2-S3 linker was not determined in the original cryo-EM study22, we used Rosetta-based structural modeling to predict its likely structure. Our result suggested that this region forms a short helix, which is consistent with the recently available TRPV1 cryo-EM structure at a higher resolution40, with Y512 and S513 residing at its junction with S3 (Fig. 5A). In this structural model, the peptide-insertion site is also a flexible junction between two helical segments, S2 and the S2-S3 linker. Patch-clamp recordings revealed that L504_8aa responded to capsaicin with an EC50 value similar to that of the wild-type channel (WT: 0.15 ± 0.02 μM. L504_8aa: 0.19 ± 0.08 μM. P = 0.57) (Fig. 5B to D). Taken together, results from our functional and computational analyses are consistent with the hypothesis that the S2-S3 linker is likely a mobile structure. The anticipated mobility would facilitate the swinging motion of Y512 upon capsaicin binding towards the nearby ligand-binding pocket14,16,23.
We further observed normal and robust fluorescence signal from cells expressing the wild-type channel or any of the three functional insertion mutants when extracellular proton or divalent cation Mg2+ was used as activator (Fig. 4). No detectable difference in the time course of fluorescence signal was observed in these recordings in comparison to capsaicin-induced signals. H+ and Mg2+ are expected to directly interact with aqueous-accessible channel structures on the extracellular side. Our observations indicate that, like capsaicin, proton- and divalent cation-induced activation conformational changes can tolerate insertions at the interface between the intracellular domains and the transmembrane core domain.
The N-terminal insertion in F430_3aa disrupted Ca2+-dependent desensitization
A possible explanation for the lack of difference in fluorescence signal between wild-type and mutant channels might be insensitivity of the non-quantitative optical method to subtle changes. Therefore, we examined the functional mutant channels with patch-clamp recordings, which confirmed observations from fluorescence recordings. We found that F430_3aa produced rapid capsaicin-induced current responses just like the wild-type channel (Fig. 6A,C). Extended recordings, however, revealed that there was a substantial difference in the current decline phase. The current decline represents Ca2+-dependent acute desensitization, a process thought to be mediated by multiple mechanisms, including binding of Ca2+-calmodulin to the ankyrin-like repeat domain34,35,41,42, phosphorylation43, and binding of PIP2 to the C-terminus44,45,46,47,48, that allosterically modulate the stability of the open pore conformation. For the wild-type channel, as expected little desensitization was observed in the absence of Ca2+. With 2 mM Ca2+ present in the solution, desensitization proceeded with a time constant of 31.4 ± 6.2 s (n = 6). In comparison, the current decline of F430_3aa channels proceeded slowly, with a time constant of 162.4 ± 53.5 s (n = 5; p < 0.05). As a result, most of the current remained at the end of the 3 min recording (Fig. 6D to I). Therefore, insertion of an unstructured peptide at the junction between the N-terminus and the transmembrane domain weakened functional coupling between these domains, substantially limited the ability of intracellular Ca2+-mediated events to modulate gating of the channel pore.
The C-terminal insertion in E693_8aa also disrupted Ca2+-mediated desensitization
Patch-clamp recordings showed that E693_8aa exhibited capsaicin-dependent activation similar to that of the wild-type and F430_3aa channels. However, like F430_3aa, we found that the desensitization process of E693_8aa was also substantially slower compared to the wild-type channel (Fig. 6). The time constant for E693_8aa desensitization was estimated to be 119.8 ± 32.7 s (n = 4), which is significantly larger than that of the wild-type channel (p < 0.05). Therefore, inserting an unstructured peptide at the junction between the C-terminus and the transmembrane domain also weakened functional coupling between these domains.
Heat activation of N- and C-terminal insertion mutants
TRPV1 is a prototypical heat-sensing ion channel1; however, how heat is sensed and used to promote activation conformational change remains unclear. Both N- and C-terminal regions, as well as extracellular regions, have been previously suggested to mediate heat activation10. If the structural element(s) responsible for high-sensitivity heat activation resides in the N- or C-terminal domain, F430_3aa and E693_8aa would offer an opportunity to test the coupling of heat-sensing and pore opening events. Indeed, for the TREK-1 channel a triple-glycine insertion that decoupled C terminus was found to largely reduce temperature sensitivity28. We first measured heat response of F430_3aa and E693_8aa with live-cell calcium imaging (Fig. 7A). Cells expressing the wild-type channel, F430_3aa, or E693_8aa exhibited clear increase in fluorescence intensity when temperature rose above similar threshold values (Fig. 7B. wild-type: 38.1 ± 0.3 °C, n = 58; F430_3aa: 39.2 ± 0.2 °C, n = 36; E693_8aa: 39.7 ± 0.2 °C, n = 28). Upon continuous heating, the fluorescence signal exhibited characteristic transient nature for all three channel-types.
To better quantify temperature sensitivity of F430_3aa and E693_8aa, we performed patch-clamp recordings. In close agreement with observations from fluorescence imaging, we observed typical heat-induced current from both mutants (Fig. 7C). Their heat activation threshold values calculated from current recordings (F430_3aa: 38.1 ± 0.6 °C, n = 4; E693_8aa: 35.4 ± 1.4 °C, n = 4) were again similar to that of the wild-type channel (36.6 ± 0.6 °C, n = 9) (Fig. 7D). The sensitivity of heat response, reflected by the steepness of current increase, was quantified by the R-value30 (see Materials and Methods for details). We found that the R-value also exhibited no significant difference between the wild-type and two insertion mutants (Fig. 7E). These observations demonstrated that insertion of an unstructured peptide between the intracellular and transmembrane domains did not prevent heat activation (even though they substantially disrupted Ca2+-dependent desensitization). We did observe that the relative amplitude of heat response compared to capsaicin response was reduced in the mutant channels (wild-type: 87 ± 10%, n = 6; F430_3aa: 37 ± 2%, n = 3; E693_8aa: 40 ± 6%, n = 3). Because capsaicin activates wild-type mTRPV1 to a stable open probability near 100%30, such reduction in relative amplitude indicated that the heat-activated pore conformation of the mutant channels might be less stable when allosteric coupling between transmembrane and intracellular domains was disrupted.
Discussion
Unstructured peptide-insertion screening, though admittedly a coarse-grained test, allowed for a quick survey of the TRPV1 intracellular structures when guided by the high-resolution cryo-EM structures. We found that all functional mutants have an insertion at the “joint” between rigid helical structures. In addition, these are also locations that appear to be capable of spatially accommodating the additional mass of the inserted unstructured peptide, a point highlighted by the fact that an eight-amino-acid insertion between E693 and S694 yielded a functional channel (E693_8aa), while increasing the size of inserted peptide to 12 amino acids was not tolerated. Exceptions to this general pattern are the two insertions bracketing the N-terminal β-hairpin structure, where structural flexibility and spatial accommodation were anticipated. The observation hence lends support of the notion that the β-sheet formed jointly by the N- and C-terminal segments may mediate important subunit-subunit interactions22. Furthermore, all insertions in the middle of helical segments, e.g., the S4-S5 linker or S6, yielded non-functional channels. Noticeably, only two of the non-functional mutants (H365_3aa and Q561_4aa) appeared to be due to trafficking defects, highlighting the sensitivity of TRPV1 gating to structural integrity of the intracellular domains. Therefore, the fact that two functional insertion mutants, F430_3aa and E693_8aa, at the junctions between the intracellular domains and the transmembrane core domain exhibited selective defects in gating (Ca2+-dependent desensitization but not activation) is worth noting.
Among TRPV1 stimulations, the capsaicin-channel interaction is the best-understood case in both location and detailed atomic interactions14,15,16,17,18,19. None of the functional insertion mutations disrupted capsaicin activation, in agreement with the notion that capsaicin-activation machinery mostly resides within the transmembrane region. Other two modalities tested in this study, Ca2+ and proton, are less well defined and likely work through multiple mechanisms (for Ca2+) or targets (for proton); nonetheless, their effects clearly start from the intracellular and extracellular side, respectively, which explains our opposite experimental observations.
In comparison to the chemical stimulations, physical stimulations for TRPV1—voltage, mechanical force, and heat—are still very poorly understood. The situation motivated the search in recent years for chemical stimuli that activate TRPV1 through the heat activation pathway. Candidates identified so far include divalent cations such as Mg2+ and Ba2+ 49,50, Na+ 51, DkTx21 and RhTx6. While drastically different in size, all of these modulators are found to be effective only when applied from the extracellular side, with their likely binding sites clustered at the outer pore region. We found in the present study that extracellular Mg2+-induced activation was only slightly disturbed in the functional insertion mutants, providing new supportive evidence that Mg2+ promotes heat activation by interacting with TRPV1 structure(s) accessible from the extracellular side.
The structural and mechanistic bases for heat activation of TRPV1 and related TRP channels remain to be explored. Noticeably, recent studies using centipede and spider toxins6,21, Mg2+ 49,50, and Na+ 51 provided fresh evidence that, together with existing findings (summarized in ref. 52), suggests that the outer pore region is involved in the heat activation process. In the present study, we found that F430_3aa and E693_8aa, with almost completely decoupled Ca2+-dependent desensitization, exhibited nearly normal heat activation. Noticeably, both capsaicin- and heat-induced activation in these mutant channels appeared to be less stable than that of the wild-type channel, which may be due to weakened allosteric coupling between the intracellular domains and the transmembrane core domain. Our observations lend further support to the idea that the transmembrane core domain is crucial for heat activation. In addition, they argue against the scenario in which an intracellularly located heat sensor is solely responsible for driving heat activation of TRPV1.
As an allosteric protein, TRPV1’s activation process can be dynamically modulated by numerous factors. Among them, Ca2+ ions are important because not only the effects are substantial and rapid but also Ca2+ influx through activated channels provides a powerful physiological negative feedback mechanism10. Modulation of channel activity by intracellular Ca2+ is mediated by multiple mechanisms utilizing calmodulin34,35,41,42, Phosphorylation43, and PIP244,45,46,47,48. As F430_3aa and E693_8aa exhibit specific and substantial deficits in Ca2+-dependent desensitization, they may serve as useful tools to further investigate the allosteric coupling process between the intracellular domains and the transmembrane core domain.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Ma, L. et al. Exploring functional roles of TRPV1 intracellular domains with unstructured peptide-insertion screening. Sci. Rep. 6, 33827; doi: 10.1038/srep33827 (2016).
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to our lab members for assistance and insightful discussion, and the Santana lab for illuminating help. This work was supported by funding from National Institutes of Health (R01NS072377) to J.Z., American Heart Association (14POST19820027) to F.Y., and an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council fellowship to L.M.
Footnotes
Author Contributions L.M., F.Y. and S.V. conducted experiments and data analysis; J.Z. participated in data analysis; L.M., F.Y. and J.Z. conceived the project and wrote the manuscript.
References
- Caterina M. J. et al. The capsaicin receptor: a heat-activated ion channel in the pain pathway. Nature 389, 816–824, 10.1038/39807 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tominaga M. et al. The cloned capsaicin receptor integrates multiple pain-producing stimuli. Neuron 21, 531–543 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ahern G. P., Brooks I. M., Miyares R. L. & Wang X. B. Extracellular cations sensitize and gate capsaicin receptor TRPV1 modulating pain signaling. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 25, 5109–5116, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0237-05.2005 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ohta T., Imagawa T. & Ito S. Novel gating and sensitizing mechanism of capsaicin receptor (TRPV1): tonic inhibitory regulation of extracellular sodium through the external protonation sites on TRPV1. The Journal of biological chemistry 283, 9377–9387, 10.1074/jbc.M709377200 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bohlen C. J. et al. A bivalent tarantula toxin activates the capsaicin receptor, TRPV1, by targeting the outer pore domain. Cell 141, 834–845, 10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.052 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang S. et al. A pain-inducing centipede toxin targets the heat activation machinery of nociceptor TRPV1. Nature communications 6, 8297, 10.1038/ncomms9297 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hakim M. A. et al. Scorpion Toxin, BmP01, Induces Pain by Targeting TRPV1 Channel. Toxins (Basel) 7, 3671–3687, 10.3390/toxins7093671 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Voets T. et al. The principle of temperature-dependent gating in cold- and heat-sensitive TRP channels. Nature 430, 748–754, 10.1038/nature02732 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koplas P. A., Rosenberg R. L. & Oxford G. S. The role of calcium in the desensitization of capsaicin responses in rat dorsal root ganglion neurons. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 17, 3525–3537 (1997). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zheng J. Molecular mechanism of TRP channels. Comprehensive Physiology 3, 221–242, 10.1002/cphy.c120001 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jordt S. E., Tominaga M. & Julius D. Acid potentiation of the capsaicin receptor determined by a key extracellular site. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97, 8134–8139, 10.1073/pnas.100129497 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matta J. A. & Ahern G. P. Voltage is a partial activator of rat thermosensitive TRP channels. The Journal of physiology 585, 469–482, 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.144287 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang F., Cui Y., Wang K. & Zheng J. Thermosensitive TRP channel pore turret is part of the temperature activation pathway. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107, 7083–7088, 10.1073/pnas.1000357107 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jordt S. E. & Julius D. Molecular basis for species-specific sensitivity to “hot” chili peppers. Cell 108, 421–430 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gavva N. R. et al. Molecular determinants of vanilloid sensitivity in TRPV1. The Journal of biological chemistry 279, 20283–20295, 10.1074/jbc.M312577200 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang F. et al. Structural mechanism underlying capsaicin binding and activation of the TRPV1 ion channel. Nature chemical biology 11, 518–524, 10.1038/nchembio.1835 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Darre L. & Domene C. Binding of Capsaicin to the TRPV1 Ion Channel. Mol Pharm 12, 4454–4465, 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5b00641 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Elokely K. et al. Understanding TRPV1 activation by ligands: Insights from the binding modes of capsaicin and resiniferatoxin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113, E137–145, 10.1073/pnas.1517288113 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang F., Vu S., Yarov-Yarovoy V. & Zheng J. Rational design and validation of a vanilloid-sensitive TRPV2 ion channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113, E3657–3666, 10.1073/pnas.1604180113 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee B. H. & Zheng J. Proton block of proton-activated TRPV1 current. The Journal of general physiology 146, 147–159, 10.1085/jgp.201511386 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bae C. et al. Structural insights into the mechanism of activation of the TRPV1 channel by a membrane-bound tarantula toxin. eLife 5, 10.7554/eLife.11273 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liao M., Cao E., Julius D. & Cheng Y. Structure of the TRPV1 ion channel determined by electron cryo-microscopy. Nature 504, 107–112, 10.1038/nature12822 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cao E., Liao M., Cheng Y. & Julius D. TRPV1 structures in distinct conformations reveal activation mechanisms. Nature 504, 113–118, 10.1038/nature12823 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De-la-Rosa V., Rangel-Yescas G. E., Ladron-de-Guevara E., Rosenbaum T. & Islas L. D. Coarse Architecture of the Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) Ion Channel Determined by Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer. The Journal of biological chemistry 288, 29506–29517, 10.1074/jbc.M113.479618 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Su Z., Anishkin A., Kung C. & Saimi Y. The core domain as the force sensor of the yeast mechanosensitive TRP channel. The Journal of general physiology 138, 627–640, 10.1085/jgp.201110693 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Niu X., Qian X. & Magleby K. L. Linker-gating ring complex as passive spring and Ca(2+)-dependent machine for a voltage- and Ca(2+)-activated potassium channel. Neuron 42, 745–756, 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.05.001 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maingret F. et al. TREK-1 is a heat-activated background K(+) channel. The EMBO journal 19, 2483–2491, 10.1093/emboj/19.11.2483 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bagriantsev S. N., Clark K. A. & Minor D. L. Jr. Metabolic and thermal stimuli control K(2P)2.1 (TREK-1) through modular sensory and gating domains. The EMBO journal 31, 3297–3308, 10.1038/emboj.2012.171 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cheng W., Yang F., Takanishi C. L. & Zheng J. Thermosensitive TRPV channel subunits coassemble into heteromeric channels with intermediate conductance and gating properties. The Journal of general physiology 129, 191–207, 10.1085/jgp.200709731 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cui Y. et al. Selective disruption of high sensitivity heat activation but not capsaicin activation of TRPV1 channels by pore turret mutations. The Journal of general physiology 139, 273–283, 10.1085/jgp.201110724 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yarov-Yarovoy V., Baker D. & Catterall W. A. Voltage sensor conformations in the open and closed states in ROSETTA structural models of K(+) channels. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103, 7292–7297, 10.1073/pnas.0602350103 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang C., Bradley P. & Baker D. Protein-protein docking with backbone flexibility. Journal of molecular biology 373, 503–519, 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.07.050 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mandell D. J., Coutsias E. A. & Kortemme T. Sub-angstrom accuracy in protein loop reconstruction by robotics-inspired conformational sampling. Nature methods 6, 551–552, 10.1038/nmeth0809-551 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lishko P. V., Procko E., Jin X., Phelps C. B. & Gaudet R. The ankyrin repeats of TRPV1 bind multiple ligands and modulate channel sensitivity. Neuron 54, 905–918, 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.05.027 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lau S. Y., Procko E. & Gaudet R. Distinct properties of Ca2+-calmodulin binding to N- and C-terminal regulatory regions of the TRPV1 channel. The Journal of general physiology 140, 541–555, 10.1085/jgp.201210810 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Phelps C. B., Wang R. R., Choo S. S. & Gaudet R. Differential regulation of TRPV1, TRPV3, and TRPV4 sensitivity through a conserved binding site on the ankyrin repeat domain. The Journal of biological chemistry 285, 731–740, 10.1074/jbc.M109.052548 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yao J., Liu B. & Qin F. Modular thermal sensors in temperature-gated transient receptor potential (TRP) channels. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108, 11109–11114, 10.1073/pnas.1105196108 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garcia-Sanz N. et al. Identification of a tetramerization domain in the C terminus of the vanilloid receptor. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 24, 5307–5314, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0202-04.2004 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garcia-Sanz N. et al. A role of the transient receptor potential domain of vanilloid receptor I in channel gating. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 27, 11641–11650, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2457-07.2007 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gao Y., Cao E., Julius D. & Cheng Y. TRPV1structures in nanodiscs reveal mechanisms of ligand and lipid action. Nature 534, 347–351, 10.1038/nature17964 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Numazaki M. et al. Structural determinant of TRPV1 desensitization interacts with calmodulin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100, 8002–8006, 10.1073/pnas.1337252100 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rosenbaum T., Gordon-Shaag A., Munari M. & Gordon S. E. Ca2+/calmodulin modulates TRPV1 activation by capsaicin. The Journal of general physiology 123, 53–62, 10.1085/jgp.200308906 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mohapatra D. P. & Nau C. Regulation of Ca2+-dependent desensitization in the vanilloid receptor TRPV1 by calcineurin and cAMP-dependent protein kinase. The Journal of biological chemistry 280, 13424–13432, 10.1074/jbc.M410917200 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ufret-Vincenty C. A. et al. Mechanism for phosphoinositide selectivity and activation of TRPV1 ion channels. The Journal of general physiology 145, 431–442, 10.1085/jgp.201511354 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Senning E. N., Collins M. D., Stratiievska A., Ufret-Vincenty C. A. & Gordon S. E. Regulation of TRPV1 ion channel by phosphoinositide (4,5)-bisphosphate: the role of membrane asymmetry. The Journal of biological chemistry 289, 10999–11006, 10.1074/jbc.M114.553180 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ufret-Vincenty C. A., Klein R. M., Hua L., Angueyra J. & Gordon S. E. Localization of the PIP2 sensor of TRPV1 ion channels. The Journal of biological chemistry 286, 9688–9698, 10.1074/jbc.M110.192526 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klein R. M., Ufret-Vincenty C. A., Hua L. & Gordon S. E. Determinants of molecular specificity in phosphoinositide regulation. Phosphatidylinositol (4,5)-bisphosphate (PI(4,5)P2) is the endogenous lipid regulating TRPV1. The Journal of biological chemistry 283, 26208–26216, 10.1074/jbc.M801912200 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lukacs V. et al. Dual regulation of TRPV1 by phosphoinositides. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 27, 7070–7080, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1866-07.2007 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cao X., Ma L., Yang F., Wang K. & Zheng J. Divalent cations potentiate TRPV1 channel by lowering the heat activation threshold. The Journal of general physiology 143, 75–90, 10.1085/jgp.201311025 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang F., Ma L., Cao X., Wang K. & Zheng J. Divalent cations activate TRPV1 through promoting conformational change of the extracellular region. The Journal of general physiology 143, 91–103, 10.1085/jgp.201311024 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jara-Oseguera A., Bae C. & Swartz K. J. An external sodium ion binding site controls allosteric gating in TRPV1 channels. eLife 5, 10.7554/eLife.13356 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zheng J. & Ma L. Structure and function of the thermoTRP channel pore. Current topics in membranes 74, 233–257, 10.1016/B978-0-12-800181-3.00009-9 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]