Skip to main content
SpringerPlus logoLink to SpringerPlus
. 2016 Sep 26;5(1):1661. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-3301-3

Some generalizations of Hermite–Hadamard type inequalities

M Rostamian Delavar 1,, M De La Sen 2
PMCID: PMC5037112  PMID: 27730023

Abstract

Some generalizations and refinements of Hermite–Hadamard type inequalities related to η-convex functions are investigated. Also applications for trapezoid and mid-point type inequalities are given.

Keywords: η-convex function, Integral inequalities, Hermite–Hadamard inequality

Introduction and preliminaries

This paper generalizes some well-known results for Hermite–Hadamard integral inequality by generalizing the convex function factor of the integrand to be an η-convex function. The obtained results have as particular cases those previously obtained for convex functions in the integrand.

The following inequality is well known in the literature as the Hermite–Hadamard integral inequality (Pecaric et al. 1991):

fa+b21b-aabfxdxfa+fb2. 1

where f:a,bR be a convex function. For more results about (1), see Alomari et al. (2010), Dragomir (1992), Kirmaci (2004), Pearce and Pecaric (2000), Rostamian Delavar and Dragomir (2016), Rostamian Delavar et al. (to appear), Wasowicz and Witkowski (2012), Yang (2001), Yang et al. (2004) and references therein.

Let I be an interval in real line R. Consider η:A×AB for appropriate A,BR.

Definition 1 (Gordji et al. 2016)

A function f:IR is called convex with respect to η (briefly η-convex), if

ftx+1-tyfy+tηfx,fy, 2

for all x,yI and t0,1.

In fact above definition geometrically says that if a function is η-convex on I, then its graph between any x,yI is on or under the path starting from y,fy and ending at (x,fy+ηfx,fy. If fx should be the end point of the path for every x,yI, then we have ηx,y=x-y and the function reduces to a convex one.

There exists η-convex functions for some bifunctions η that are not convex. We have the following simple examples:

Example 2 (Gordji et al. 2015)

a. Consider a function f:RR defined by

fx=-x,x0;x,x<0.

and define a bifunction η as ηx,y=-x-y, for all x,yR-=-,0. It is not hard to check that f is a η-convex function but not a convex one.

b. Define the function f:R+R+ by

fx=x,0x1;1,x>1.

and define the bifunction η:R+×R+R+ by

ηx,y=x+y,xy;2x+y,x>y.

Then f is η-convex but is not convex.

The following theorem is an important result:

Theorem 3

(Gordji et al. 2016) Suppose thatf:IRis aη-convex function andηis bounded from above onfI×fI. Thenfsatisfies a Lipschitz condition on any closed intervala,bcontained in the interiorIofI. Hence,fis absolutely continuous ona,band continuous onI.

Remark 4

As a consequence of Theorem 3, an η-convex function f:a,bR where η is bounded from above on fa,b×fa,b is integrable.

The following simple lemma is required.

Lemma 5

Suppose thata,bR. Then

(i) min{a,b}a+b2.

(ii) iff, gare integrable ona,bthen,abmin{f,g}=minabf,abg.

Proof

Assertions are consequence of this fact:

min{a,b}=a+b-a-b2.

We have a basic lemma:

Lemma 6

Letf:a,bRbe aη-convex function. Then for anyt0,1we have the inequalities

12fta+1-tb+f1-ta+tbminfb+12ηfa,fb,fa+12ηfb,fa12fa+fb+14ηfa,fb+ηfb,fa, 3
12fta+1-tb+f1-ta+tb12fa+fb+t12ηfa,fb+ηfb,fa, 4
f(ta+(1-t)b)12[f(a)+f(b)]+12[tη(f(a),f(b))+(1-t)η(f(b),f(a))] 5

and

fa+b2minfta+1-tb+12ηf1-ta+tb,fta+1-tb,f1-ta+tb+12ηfta+1-tb,f1-ta+tb12f1-ta+tb+fta+1-tb+14ηf1-ta+tb,fta+1-tb+14ηfta+1-tb,f1-ta+tb. 6

Proof

If in (2) we put t instead of 1-t and then add that inequality with (2) we have:

12fta+1-tb+f1-ta+tbfb+12ηfa,fb 7

for all t0,1.

If in (7) we replace a with b and add the result with (7), then we have (3).

Now, if in (2) we put a instead of b and then add that inequality with (2) we get:

fta+1-tb+ftb+1-tafb+fa+tηfa,fb+ηfb,fa

for all t0,1, which is equivalent to (4).

If we change a with b, and t with 1-t in (2) and then add that inequality with (2) we get:

2fta+1-tbfb+fa+tηfa,fb+1-tηfb,fa

for all t0,1 and the inequality (5) is proved.

Finally since we have

fa+b2=fta+1-tb+tb+1-ta2

and

fa+b2=ftb+1-ta+ta+1-tb2,

then by using (2) we can obtain (6) □

Hermite–Hadamard type inequalities

In this section we obtain some Hermite–Hadamard type integral inequalities which improve right and left side of (1) respectively.

Theorem 1

Letf:a,bRbe aη-convex function withηbounded from above onfa,b×fa,b. Then we have inequalities

1201[fta+1-tb+f1-ta+tb]minfb+12ηfa,fb,fa+12ηfb,fa12fa+fb+14ηfa,fb+ηfb,fa, 8
1201[fta+1-tb+f1-ta+tb]12fa+fb+12ηfa,fb+ηfb,fa01tdt 9

and

01fta+1-tbdt12fa+fb+12ηfa,fb01tdt+12ηfb,fa011-tdt. 10

Proof

Since η is bounded from above on fa,b×fa,b, the note after Theorem 3, guarantees existence of above integrals. The inequalities (8)–(10) follow by Lemma 6 on integrating over t0,1.

Remark 2

If f:a,bR is a η-convex function and η is bounded from above on fa,b×fa,b, then by Theorem 1 we have

12ab[fx+fa+b-x]dxminfb+12ηfa,fb,fa+12ηfb,fab-a12fa+fbb-a+14ηfa,fb+ηfb,fab-a, 11
12ab[fx+fa+b-x]dx12fa+fbb-a+12ηfa,fb+ηfb,fab-aabx-adx, 12

and

abfx12fa+fbb-a+12ηfa,fbb-aabx-adx+12ηfb,fab-aabb-xdx. 13

All of inequalities (11)–(13) are different views for right side of generalized Hermite-Hadamard inequalities and finally can be stated as a unique form of

1b-aabfxdx12fa+fb+14ηfa,fb+ηfb,fa. 14

If we suppose that ηx,y=x-y, then we recapture right side of (1).

Also we can obtain the following result:

Theorem 3

Letf:a,bRbe aη-convex function withηbounded from above onfa,b×fa,b. Then we have the inequalities:

fa+b201minfta+1-tb+12ηf1-ta+tb,fta+1-tb,f1-ta+tb+12ηfta+1-tb,f1-ta+tbdtmin01fta+1-tbdt+1201ηf1-ta+tb,fta+1-tbdt,01f1-ta+tbdt+1201ηfta+1-tb,f1-ta+tbdt01fta+1-tb+f1-ta+tb2dt+1401ηf1-ta+tb,fta+1-tb+ηfta+1-tb,f1-ta+tbdt. 15

Proof

From (6) we have

fa+b2minfta+1-tb+12ηf1-ta+tb,fta+1-tb,f1-ta+tb+12ηfta+1-tb,f1-ta+tb,

for any t0,1. Integrating over t we get the first inequality in (15). Now Using properties of Lemma 5 along with integrating rules gives

01minfta+1-tb+12ηf1-ta+tb,fta+1-tb,f1-ta+tb+12ηfta+1-tb,f1-ta+tbdtmin01fta+1-tbdt+1201ηf1-ta+tb,fta+1-tbdt,01f1-ta+tbdt+1201ηfta+1-tb,f1-ta+tbdt01fta+1-tb+f1-ta+tb2dt+1401ηf1-ta+tb,fta+1-tb+ηfta+1-tb,f1-ta+tbdt.

Remark 4

If f:a,bR is a η-convex function and η is bounded from above on fa,b×fa,b, then by Theorem 3 we have

fa+b2b-aabminfa+b-x+12ηfx,fa+b-x,fx+12ηfa+b-x,fxdxminabfa+b-xdx+12abηfx,fa+b-xdx,abfxdx+12abηfa+b-x,fxdxabfa+b-x+fx2dx+14ab[ηfx,fa+b-x+ηfa+b-x,fx]dx=abfxdx+12abηfx,fa+b-xdx, 16

which gives a refinement for left side of (1). If we suppose that ηx,y=x-y, then we recapture left side of (1).

Trapezoid and mid-point type inequalities

An interesting question in (1), is estimating the difference between left and middle terms and between right and middle terms. In this section we investigate about this question, when the absolute value of the derivative of a function is η-convex. We need Lemma 2.1 in Kirmaci (2004):

Lemma 1

Suppose thatf:a,bRis a differentiable mapping,g:a,bR+is a continuous mapping andfis integrable ona,b. Then

1b-aabfxdx-fa+b2=b-a01/2tfta+1-tbdt+1/21(t-1)fta+1-tbdt,

Remark 2

In Lemma 1, if we use the change of variable x=tb+1-ta, then

1b-aabfxdx-fa+b2=b-a01/2(-t)f(tb+(1-t)a)dt+1/21(1-t)f(tb+(1-t)a)dt,

Using Lemma 1, we can prove the following theorem to estimate the difference between the middle and left terms in (1).

Theorem 3

Suppose thatf:a,bRis a differentiable mapping andfis anη-convex mapping ona,bwith a boundedηfrom above. Then

1b-aabfxdx-fa+b218b-aK,

where

K=minfb+ηfa,fb2,fa+ηfb,fa2

Proof

From η-convexity of f, Theorem 3 and Lemma 1 it follows that

1b-aabfxdx-fa+b2b-a01/2tfb+tηfa,fbdt+1/21(1-t)fb+tηfa,fbdt=18b-a2fb+ηfa,fb=I

On the other hand according to Remark 2 we have

1b-aabfxdx-fa+b2b-a01/2(-t)fa+tηfb,fadt+1/21(t-1)fa+tηfb,fadt=18b-a2fa+ηfb,fa=J

Then we can deduce the result from

1b-aabfxdx-fa+b2min{I,J}.

Remark 4

If in the proof of Theorem 3 we consider ηx,y=x-y for all x,ya,b, we approach to Theorem 2.2 in Kirmaci (2004).

The following is Lemma 2.1 in Dragomir and Agarwal (1998).

Lemma 5

Suppose thatf:a,bRis a differentiable function andfis an integrable function ona,b. Then

fa+fb2-1b-aabfxdx=1b-aab(x-a+b2)fxdx. 17

Using Lemma 5, we can prove the following theorem to estimate the difference between the middle and right terms in (1).

Theorem 6

Suppose thatf:a,bRis a differentiable function andfis anη-convex function whereηis bounded from above ona,b. Then

fa+fb2-1b-aabfxdx18b-aK,

where

K=minfb+ηfa,fb2,fa+ηfb,fa2.

Proof

Using Lemma 5 and the change of the variable x=ta+1-tb, t0,1 in right hand of (7) along with the fact that f is η-convex imply that

fa+fb2-1b-aabfxdx1b-aab(x-a+b2)fxdx=b-a201(1-2t)fta+1-tbdtb-a2011-2tfta+1-tbdtb-a201|1-2t|fb+tηfa,fbdt=b-a42fb+ηfa,fb. 18

Similarly if we use the change of variable x=tb+1-ta, t0,1 we have

fa+fb2-1b-aabfxdxb-a42fa+ηfb,fa.

Remark 7

Theorem 6 reduces to Theorem 2.2 in Dragomir and Agarwal (1998), if we consider ηx,y=x-y for all x,ya,b.

Conclusions

The convexity of a function is a basis for many inequalities in mathematics and is applicable for nonlinear programming and optimization theory. It should be noticed that in new problems related to convexity, generalized notions about convex functions are required to obtain applicable results. One of this generalizations may be notion of η-convex functions which can generalizes many inequalities related to convex functions such as the famous Hermite-Hadamard inequality along with estimating the difference between left and middle terms and between right and middle terms of this inequality. Also refinement of Hermite-Hadamard inequality is another application of η-convex functions.

Authors’ contributions

All authors contributed equally in this article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors are very grateful to Prof. S.S. Dragomir for his valuable suggestions about properties of η-convex functions. We are also thankful to the anonymous referees for the useful comments. Author M. De la Sen is grateful to the Basque Government by its support through Grant IT987-16 (internal code 182) and to the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness by its support through Grant DPI2015-64766-R including the partial support by FEDER (European Research Funds of Regional Development).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Contributor Information

M. Rostamian Delavar, Email: m.rostamian@ub.ac.ir

M. De La Sen, Email: manuel.delasen@ehu.es

References

  1. Alomari M, Darus M, Kirmaci US. Refinements of Hadamard-type inequalities for quasi-convex functions with applications to trapezoidal formula and to special means. Comput Math Appl. 2010;59:225–232. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2009.08.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dragomir SS. Two mappings in connection to Hadamards inequalities. J Math Anal Appl. 1992;167:49–56. doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(92)90233-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dragomir SS, Agarwal RP. Two inequalities for differentiable mappings and applications to special means of real numbers and to trapezoidal formula. Appl Math Lett. 1998;11:91–95. doi: 10.1016/S0893-9659(98)00086-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gordji ME, Dragomir SS, Delavar MR. An inequality related to η-convex functions (II) Int J Nonlinear Anal Appl. 2015;6(2):26–32. [Google Scholar]
  5. Gordji ME, Delavar MR, De La Sen M. On φ-convex functions. J Math Inequal. 2016;10(1):173–183. doi: 10.7153/jmi-10-15. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kirmaci US. Inequalities for differentiable mappings and applications to special means of real numbers and to midpoint formula. Appl Math Comput. 2004;147(1):137–146. doi: 10.1016/S0096-3003(02)00657-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pearce CEM, Pecaric JE. Inequalities for differentiable mappings with application to special means and quadrature formula. Appl Math Lett. 2000;13:51–55. doi: 10.1016/S0893-9659(99)00164-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pecaric JE, Proechan F, Tong YL. Convex functions, partial ordering and statistical applications. New York: Academic Press; 1991. [Google Scholar]
  9. Rostamian Delavar M, Dragomir SS (2016) On η-convexity. Math Inequal Appl (preprint)
  10. Rostamian Delavar M, Dragomir SS, Gordji ME. An inequality related to η-convex functions. U P B Sci ​Bull Ser A​ (to apear)​
  11. Wasowicz S, Witkowski A. On some inequality of Hermite–Hamard type. Opusc Math. 2012;32(3):591–600. doi: 10.7494/OpMath.2012.32.3.591. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Yang GS. Inequalities of Hadamard type for Lipschitzian mappings. J Math Anal Appl. 2001;260:230–238. doi: 10.1006/jmaa.2000.7460. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Yang GS, Hwang DY, Tseng KL. Some inequalities for differentiable convex and concave mappings. Comput Math Appl. 2004;47:207–216. doi: 10.1016/S0898-1221(04)90017-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from SpringerPlus are provided here courtesy of Springer-Verlag

RESOURCES