Skip to main content
Oncology Letters logoLink to Oncology Letters
. 2016 Aug 16;12(4):2329–2336. doi: 10.3892/ol.2016.5027

Mechanism analysis of colorectal cancer according to the microRNA expression profile

Hong Li 1, Huichao Zhang 1, Gang Lu 1, Qingjing Li 1, Jifeng Gu 1, Yuan Song 1, Shejun Gao 1,, Yawen Ding 1
PMCID: PMC5038387  PMID: 27698796

Abstract

The present study aimed to identify specific microRNAs (miRs) and their predicted target genes to clarify the molecular mechanisms of colorectal cancer (CRC). An miR expression profile (array ID, GSE39833), which consisted of 88 CRC samples with various tumor-necrosis-metastasis stages and 11 healthy controls, was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. Subsequently, the differentially expressed miRs and their target genes were screened. Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathways of target genes were analyzed using the Database for Annotation Visualization and Integrated Discovery. A protein-protein interaction (PPI) network of the target genes was constructed using the Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes database. The present study identified a total of 18 differentially expressed miRs (upregulated, 8; downregulated, 10) in the sera of the CRC patients compared with the healthy controls. Of these, 3 upregulated (let-7b, miR-1290 and miR-126) and 2 downregulated (miR-16 and miR-760) differentially expressed miRs and their target genes, including cyclin D1 (CCND1), v-myc avian myelocytomatosis viral oncogene homolog (MYC), phosphoinositide-3-kinase, regulatory subunit 2 (beta) (PIK3R2) and SMAD family member 3 (SMAD3), were significantly enriched in the CRC developmental pathway. All these target genes had higher node degrees in the PPI network. In conclusion, let-7b, miR-1290, miR-126, miR-16 and miR-760 and their target genes, CCND1, MYC, PIK3R2 and SMAD3, may be important in the molecular mechanisms for the progression of CRC.

Keywords: colorectal cancer, microRNAs, target genes, pathway analysis, protein-protein interaction network analysis

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a global health challenge with >1.2 million novel cases and 600,000 mortalities every year (1). Survival rates of CRC greatly depend on the stage at primary diagnosis, and the 5-year survival rate is 93 and 8% for stage I and IV, respectively (2). Systematic methods for diagnosis, including flexible sigmoidoscopy and implementation of the fecal occult blood test, may contribute to a high detection rate of patients in the early stages of CRC, thus reducing mortality rates (3). There are numerous screening methods, drugs and chemotherapy regimens, including irinotecan and oxaliplatin, available; however, the majority of these have low sensitivity and treatment-limiting side effects (46). Therefore, the development of highly sensitive and CRC-specific diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers is required for the diagnosis and treatment of early stage CRC.

MicroRNAs (miRs) have emerged as important molecules involved in tumorigenesis and disease progression and metastasis in various cancers, including CRC (7). miRs are endogenous, short non-coding RNAs that effectively inhibit target gene activity by binding to target mRNAs and hindering their translation (8). Each miR achieves functional specificity by targeting a core network of genes and has potential effects on almost every genetic pathway (9). Increasing evidence suggests that aberrant miR expression is clearly associated with the initiation and progression of certain cancers, and miRs may act as oncogenes and/or tumor suppressor genes (10). miR-21 downregulates tumor suppressor programmed cell death 4 at a post-transcriptional level and promotes the invasion, intravasation and metastasis of CRC (11). miR-335 exhibits anti-tumoral activity in various tumors, including gastric cancer (12), ovarian cancer (13) and CRC (14). Therefore, pivotal miRs may be informative biomarkers for detection, diagnosis and prognosis of various types of cancer. Furthermore, miRs have emerged as highly tissue-specific biomarkers (15,16), and previous studies have paved the way for miR-based cancer tissue classification (17,18). However, miRs associated with CRC and their roles in the molecular pathogenesis of CRC remain unclear.

To date, one of the most interesting findings is that secreted miRs potentially influence target cell function via exosomes (19). Exosomes are small (30–90 nm) membrane vesicles that carry mRNAs, proteins, lipids and miRs, depending on the origin of the secreting cells (20,21). Previous studies have demonstrated that exosomes are the newest family members of ‘bioactive vesicles’ that promote intercellular communication and immunoregulatory processes via shuttling molecules between cells (22,23). miRs carried in exosomes are secreted from cancer cells into body fluids, such as blood, urine, breast milk and saliva (21). Therefore, exosomal miRs in body fluids may be useful diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of cancers (24). However, research on the association between exosomal miR profiles in blood and the pathological condition of cancer patients are limited.

In a previous study, the exosomal miR profile (GSE39833) (25) has been used to highlight the most abundant miRs in the blood of patients with CRC using an arbitrary boundary. In silico analysis of these miRs was performed to explore the function of miRs as tumor surveillance mechanisms exerting continuous inhibition on tumor formation. There was no systematic and comprehensive analysis for the miR functions in CRC. Therefore, the present study used microarray analysis to screen the differentially expressed miRs in the sera of patients with CRC. Additionally, in order to improve the understanding of miR functions, the predicted target genes of miRs were identified. Comprehensive bioinformatics methods were used to investigate the function and pathways of target genes of miRs and construct a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network to identify the hub target genes and miRs associated with CRC. The present study aimed to investigate the key role of potentially important miRs and their target genes in the initiation and progression of CRC. The present study may provide a basis for screening novel biomarkers of CRC for therapeutic interventions.

Materials and methods

Microarray data of miRs

The miR expression profile was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) using the series accession number GSE39833, which was deposited by Ogata-Kawata et al (3). The GSE39833 dataset consisted of 88 CRC patients with various tumor-necrosis-metastasis stages (stage I, 20 patients; II, 20 patients; IIIa, 20 patients; IIIb, 16 patients; IV, 12 patients) between the ages of 45–65 years and 11 healthy controls. An Agilent Human miRNA Microarray platform was used (product no., G4470C; design ID, 021827; Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA).

Data preprocessing and screening of differentially expressed miRs

Limma (26) (version 2.7.10; bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/limma.html) package in R (version 2.3.1; www.r-project.org/) was used for data preprocessing and normalization. A T-test (26) in Limma package was used to identify the significantly differentially expressed miRs in the CRC group compared with the healthy control group. P<0.05 and |log2 fold change|>1.5 were considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Prediction of the target genes for miRs

Identification of the predicted target genes of miRs is conducive to improve the understanding of miR functions. miRecords (version 3; c1.accurascience.com/miRecords/) and miRWalk (verison 2.0; zmf.umm.uni-heidelberg.de/apps/zmf/mirwalk2/) were used to retrieve the target genes of the differentially expressed miRs. miRecords (27), an integrated database for miR-target interactions (MTIs), hosts a large, high-quality, manually curated database of experimentally validated MTIs. miRWalk (28), a comprehensive database on miRs, hosts predicted and validated miR binding sites and information on all known genes of human, mouse and rat. Only miR-target interactions present in the two databases were used, since target genes shared by the two databases were considered to be more reliable.

Function and pathway enrichment analysis

Functional analysis of large gene lists from high-throughput genomic, proteomic and bioinformatics scanning approaches increases the likelihood for researchers to identify biological processes most associated with their study (29). Gene Ontology (GO) analysis is increasingly applied for functional studies of microarray data (30). Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) is the major public pathway-associated database (31), and Database for Annotation Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) is a tool for providing functional annotation behind large-scale genomic or transcriptomic data (32). DAVID online analytical tool (version 6.7; david.ncifcrf.gov/) was utilized to analyze the significantly enriched GO terms (geneontology.org/) and KEGG pathways (www.genome.jp/kegg/) for target genes of miRs. Each GO term or KEGG pathway included at least two genes, and P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Construction of a PPI network

Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes (STRING) (33) is a database providing the predicted protein interaction information in a given cell context. PPI networks are increasingly becoming the focus of research in the identification of the cellular function of proteins in various organisms (34). Based on the information of the STRING database (version 8.3; string-db.org/), a protein interaction network was constructed by mapping the target genes of miRs. The interaction pairs with a combined score of 0.4 were selected in this network.

Results

Screening of differentially expressed miRs

In the present study, the expression levels of 851 miRs were acquired following normalization. Following a comparison of the expression between the CRC and healthy control samples using a t-test, 18 differentially expressed miRs were identified (Table I). Among them, 8 miRs were upregulated (Table IA) and 10 were downregulated (Table IB).

Table I.

Differentially expressed miRs between colorectal cancer and healthy control samples.

A, Upregulated differentially expressed miRs

miR Log2, FC P-value
hsa-let-7b 0.58796649 2.89×10−3
hsa-miR-1246 2.59391919   7.14×10−10
hsa-miR-126 3.16477901 6.27×10−9
hsa-miR-1290 1.32767795 3.49×10−5
hsa-miR-181b 1.08748377 3.88×10−2
hsa-miR-181d 1.41294860 2.45×10−2
hsa-miR-23a 1.87225376 6.94×10−8
hsa-miR-654-5p 1.35980450 1.25×10−3

B, Downregulated differentially expressed miRs

miR Log2, FC P-value

hsa-miR-1225-5p −0.81943754 9.73×10−4
hsa-miR-1287 −0.72720715 2.84×10−3
hsa-miR-1295 −1.44266151 5.07×10−5
hsa-miR-1299 −1.22393055 4.15×10−3
hsa-miR-144 −2.48669140 1.47×10−9
hsa-miR-16 −1.35722402 2.42×10−5
hsa-miR-513a-5p −0.90185107 3.77×10−4
hsa-miR-575 −0.86229919   5.94×10−10
hsa-miR-652 −1.77364130   8.49×10−12
hsa-miR-760 −0.91368658 1.36×10−2

miR, microRNA; FC, fold change.

Prediction of the target genes for miRs

Based on the information of miRecords and miRTarBase database, 27 target genes corresponding to the 8 upregulated miRs (Fig. 1) and 79 target genes corresponding to 4 out of 10 downregulated miRs (Fig. 2) were obtained. In total, 6 out of 10 downregulated miRs, miR-1287, miR-1295, miR-1299, miR-144, miR-575 and miR-652, did not have their target genes identified.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Upregulated miR-target gene interactions. Red triangles represent miRs and pink ovals represent their target genes. The lines demonstrate the associations between the miRs and the target genes. miR, microRNA.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Downregulated miR-target gene interactions. Red triangles represent miRs and green ovals represent their target genes. The lines demonstrate the associations between the miRs and the target genes. miR, microRNA.

Function and pathway enrichment analysis

In the present study, 15 KEGG pathways corresponding to the upregulated miRs and 9 KEGG pathways corresponding to the downregulated miRs were enriched, respectively, using a cutoff criteria of P<0.05 (Table II). The present results revealed that the pathways enriched by differentially expressed miRs were not only associated with various types of cancer, including chronic myeloid leukemia, small cell lung cancer, endometrial cancer and CRC, but also with important signaling pathways, including the ErbB, Wnt, Jak-STAT and p53 signaling pathways (Table II). Notably, the present results demonstrated that the target genes of upregulated miRs, such as cyclin D1 (CCND1), v-myc avian myelocytomatosis viral oncogene homolog (MYC) and phosphoinositide-3-kinase, regulatory subunit 2 (beta) (PIK3R2) (Table IIA), and target genes of downregulated miRs, such as CCND1, mutS homolog 2 (MSH2), jun proto-oncogene (JUN), B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2 (BCL2) and SMAD family member 3 (SMAD3) (Table IIB), were all enriched in CRC pathways; therefore, these target genes may be closely associated with CRC. Additionally, the upregulated miRs of these target genes were let-7b (CCND1), miR-1290 (MYC) and miR-126 (PIK3R2). The downregulated miRs of these target genes were miR-16 (CCND1, MSH2, JUN, BCL2) and miR-760 (SMAD3).

Table II.

Enriched KEGG pathways of target genes in colorectal cancer samples.

A, Enriched KEGG pathways of upregulated target genes

KEGG ID Description Count P-value Genes
hsa05220 Chronic myeloid leukemia 5 1.33×10−5 CCND1, CRKL, CDK6, MYC, PIK3R2
hsa05200 Pathways in cancer 5 3.90×10−3 CCND1, CRKL, CDK6, MYC, PIK3R2
hsa05222 Small cell lung cancer 4 6.52×10−4 CCND1, CDK6, MYC, PIK3R2
hsa04110 Cell cycle 4 2.07×10−3 CCND1, CDK6, MYC, CDC25A
hsa05213 Endometrial cancer 3 5.32×10−3 CCND1, MYC, PIK3R2
hsa05223 Non-small cell lung cancer 3 5.73×10−3 CCND1, CDK6, PIK3R2
hsa05221 Acute myeloid leukemia 3 6.58×10−3 CCND1, MYC, PIK3R2
hsa05214 Glioma 3 7.73×10−3 CCND1, CDK6, PIK3R2
hsa05218 Melanoma 3 9.75×10−3 CCND1, CDK6, PIK3R2
hsa05212 Pancreatic cancer 3 1.00×10−2 CCND1, CDK6, PIK3R2
hsa05210 Colorectal cancer 3 1.35×10−2 CCND1, MYC, PIK3R2
hsa04012 ErbB signaling pathway 3 1.44×10−2 CRKL, MYC, PIK3R2
hsa04670 Leukocyte transendothelial migration 3 2.56×10−2 VCAM1, CXCL12, PIK3R2
hsa04310 Wnt signaling pathway 3 4.04×10−2 CCND1, NLK, MYC
hsa04630 Jak-STAT signaling pathway 3 4.24×10−2 CCND1, MYC, PIK3R2

B, Enriched KEGG pathways of downregulated target genes

KEGG ID Description Count P-value Genes

hsa05200 Pathways in cancer 9 5.85×10−4 E2F1, CCNE1, CCND1, HSP90B1, XIAP, MSH2, JUN, BCL2, SMAD3
hsa04110 Cell cycle 7 8.70×10−5 E2F1, CCNE1, CCND1, CCND3, CDC14B, SMAD3, GADD45B
hsa04510 Focal adhesion 6 6.74×10−3 CCND1, CCND3, XIAP, JUN, BCL2, KDR
hsa05210 Colorectal cancer 5 1.55×10−3 CCND1, MSH2, JUN, BCL2, SMAD3
hsa05222 Small cell lung cancer 5 1.55×10−3 E2F1, CCNE1, CCND1, XIAP, BCL2
hsa05215 Prostate cancer 5 1.92×10−3 E2F1, CCNE1, CCND1, HSP90B1, BCL2
hsa04310 Wnt signaling pathway 5 1.26×10−2 CCND1, CSNK2A1, CCND3, JUN, SMAD3
hsa04144 Endocytosis 5 2.43×10−2 VPS45, HSPA1A, PDCD6IP, HLA-G, KDR
hsa04115 p53 signaling pathway 4 7.87×10−3 CCNE1, CCND1, CCND3, GADD45B

Count, number of up/downregulated target genes enriched in KEGG pathway; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes.

Furthermore, based on GO enrichment analysis associated with the biological processes of target genes, 35 and 96 GO terms were identified, which were enriched corresponding to the up/downregulated miRs, respectively (Table III). The results revealed that the target genes of differentially expressed miRs were significantly associated with cell cycle processes and response to hormone stimulus.

Table III.

Ten of the most enriched GO terms associated with the biological process of target genes in colorectal cancer samples.

A, Enriched GO terms of upregulated target genes

GO ID Description Count P-value
GO:0045449 Regulation of transcription 10 2.14×10−2
GO:0010033 Response to organic substance   7 1.04×10−3
GO:0022402 Cell cycle   6 2.25×10−3
GO:0007049 Cell cycle   6 8.69×10−3
GO:0010604 Positive regulation of macromolecule metabolic process   6 1.30×10−2
GO:0043627 Response to estrogen stimulus   5 2.71×10−5
GO:0048545 Response to steroid hormone stimulus   5 2.82×10−4
GO:0045596 Negative regulation of cell differentiation   5 4.41×10−4
GO:0009725 Response to hormone stimulus   5 3.14×10−3
GO:0043627 Response to estrogen stimulus   5 3.23×10−3

B, Enriched GO terms of downregulated target genes

GO ID Description Count P-value

GO:0006915 Apoptosis 13 1.80×10−5
GO:0012501 Programmed cell death 13 2.08×10−5
GO:0008219 Cell death 13 1.01×10−4
GO:0016265 Cell death 13 1.08×10−4
GO:0007049 Cell cycle 12 8.20×10−4
GO:0051726 Regulation of cell cycle 11 2.71×10−6
GO:0006793 Phosphorus metabolic process 11 1.38×10−2
GO:0006796 Phosphate metabolic process 11 1.38×10−2
GO:0016310 Phosphorylation 10 1.13×10−2
GO:0042981 Regulation of apoptosis 10 1.17×10−2

GO ID, identification number of enriched GO term associated with a biological process; Count, number of up/downregulated target genes; GO, Gene Ontology.

PPI network construction of differentially expressed miR target genes

According to the information from STRING database, a PPI network of differentially expressed miR target genes was constructed (Fig. 3). The results demonstrated that the top 6 target genes, from high to low expression based on node degree, were estrogen receptor 1 (degree=19), MYC (degree=18), JUN (degree=17), CCND1 (degree=15), cell division cycle 25A (degree=10) and H3 histone, family 3B (degree=10). Notably, all the target genes enriched in the CRC pathway, including CCND1, MYC, PIK3R2, MSH2, JUN, BCL2 and SMAD3, had higher node degrees in the PPI network and the node degrees of these genes was >4.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Protein to protein interaction network of differentially expressed miR target genes. Pink ovals represent target genes corresponding to upregulated miRs and green ovals represent target genes corresponding to downregulated miRs. The lines demonstrate the interaction between target genes. miR, microRNA.

Discussion

CRC is a complex disease with genetic and epigenetic alterations in numerous key oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes (35). However, the precise molecular mechanisms leading to anticancer activities in CRC remain unclear. miR biology has increasingly become a focus in the field of cancer research, and secreted miRs embedded in exosomes have emerged as diagnostic biomarkers for cancer detection (24). The present study analyzed the exosomal miR profile in the sera of CRC patients, derived from a GEO database, to screen differentially expressed miRs between CRC patients and healthy controls, and their target genes for therapeutic intervention.

A total of 18 differentially expressed miRs were identified in the sera of CRC patients compared to healthy controls. Furthermore, the present results revealed that 3 upregulated (let-7b, miR-1290 and miR-126) and 2 downregulated (miR-16 and miR-760) differentially expressed miRs and their target genes, including CCND1, MYC, PIK3R2 and SMAD3, were significantly enriched in the CRC pathway. All these target genes had higher node degrees in a PPI network constructed in the present study.

CCND1 was the identified crucial target gene of let-7b and miR-16 in the network of miRs and target genes. let-7b is a member of the let-7 family, which may inhibit cancer cell growth and promote cell apoptosis via post-transcriptional repression of cytochrome P450 epoxygenase 2J2 (CYP2J2) (36). CYP2J2 has been observed to have a tumor-promotion function in human cancer (36). In addition, miR-16 is a regulator of microtubule-associated protein 7 in modulating the proliferation in several types of cancer cell (37). In vitro experiments reveal that overexpression of miR-16 represses the proliferation and induces apoptosis of CRC cells by regulating the p53/survivin signaling pathway (38). Furthermore, CCND1 is widely recognized to be involved in cancer cell cycle progression and is vital in controlling G1/S cell cycle transition (39). CCND1 regulates the switch between proliferation and growth arrest, and the CCND1 G870A polymorphism contributes to CRC susceptibility (40). Additionally, CCND1 is regulated by the miR-16 family, and the miR-16 family induces G1 arrest by regulating the expression of CCND1 (41). let-7b inhibits cell cycle progression and anchorage-independent growth of melanoma cells via the downregulation of CCND1 (42). The results of the present study are similar to those of previous studies, as let-7b and miR-16 could directly target CCND1. The present results additionally suggest that let7b and miR-16 inhibit CRC progression by targeting CCND1.

miR-1290 was also demonstrated to be upregulated in the present study. miR-1290 and its target gene MYC are considered to be crucial in the regulation of CRC. Upregulation of miR-1290 in colon cancer cells impairs cytokinesis, which is the final step of cell division (43). Furthermore, overexpression of miR-1290 activates the Wnt pathway (43), which has been demonstrated in several types of cancer, including CRC (44), and is important in tumorigenesis (45). The MYC proto-oncogene encodes a prototypical oncogenic transcription factor that is crucial in the genesis of various cancers (46). MYC is part of the Mad-Max network that regulates the cell cycle, and cell differentiation and apoptosis (47,48). Previous experimental data indicates that even a slight inhibition of c-MYC expression may permanently inhibit tumor growth and enhance the regression of tumors (49). A previous study by Wu et al (43) demonstrated that miR-1290 was involved in the reprogramming of colon cancer cells by increasing the expression of c-MYC. Thus, miR-1290 may be a putative oncogenic miR in promoting CRC progression.

Similarly, the upregulated miR-126 and target gene PIK3R2 were also identified in the network of miRs and target genes. miR-126 is upregulated in primary CRC tissues and cell lines; a previous study verified that epigenetic silencing of miR-126 in CRC cells effectively leads to cell growth, migration and invasion (50,51). PIK3R2 is a key regulator in the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway, which is a key signal transduction system that associates oncogenes with numerous cellular functions and has a role in human cancer (52). In addition, miR-126 may be important in tumorigenesis and metastasis by targeting PIK3R2 to regulate the vascular endothelial growth factor/PI3K/protein kinase B signaling pathway in human breast cancer (53). On the basis of the present results, the present authors hypothesise that miR-126 may be an important molecule in the pathogenesis of CRC via the regulation of PIK3R2.

In the present study miR-760 was downregulated, and was demonstrated to interact with SMAD3. SMAD3 is a downstream mediator of the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) signaling pathway (54). TGF-β signaling regulates tumorigenesis, and its signaling pathway is crucial in tumor progression in human cancer (55). Additionally, SMAD3 expression decreases susceptibility to tumorigenicity in the early stages of gastric carcinogenesis (56). In the present study, miR-760 was downregulated, which was similar to a previous finding that miR-760 had a lower expression in CRC tissues and might be a biomarker for the early detection of CRC (57). Therefore, miR-760 may indirectly inhibit tumorigenesis and progression of CRC by targeting SMAD3. However, few functional studies have been performed on miR-760; therefore, additional experimental validation and high throughput data analysis are required.

In conclusion, the present study has identified differentially expressed miRs in the sera of CRC patients compared with healthy controls. let-7b, miR-16, miR-1290, miR-126 and miR-760, and their target genes, CCND1, MYC, PIK3R2 and SMAD3, may be important in the initiation and progression of CRC. let-7b and miR-16 may regulate cell cycle processes by interacting with CCND1, thus inhibiting cancer cell proliferation and growth and induce cell apoptosis. miR-1290 and miR-126 may function in promoting the tumorigenesis and metastasis of CRC cells via the regulation of MYC and PIK3R2, respectively, while miR-760 may indirectly prevent the progression of CRC by targeting SMAD3. Therefore, these 5 miRs and their target genes may be candidate biomarkers for the diagnosis and treatment of CRC. In addition, the present study provides intriguing clues as to the identification of potential candidate biomarkers. The target genes of 6 downregulated miRs, including miR-1287, miR-1295, miR-1299, miR-144, miR-575 and miR-652, were not identified in the present study; therefore, whether they are associated with CRC requires addition study. Overall, the present study may aid additional clinical molecular target therapy experiments concerning CRC.

References

  • 1.Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Løvf M, Nome T, Bruun J, Eknaes M, Bakken AC, Mpindi JP, Kilpinen S, Rognum TO, Nesbakken A, Kallioniemi O, et al. A novel transcript, VNN1-AB, as a biomarker for colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2014;135:2077–2084. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ogata-Kawata H, Izumiya M, Kurioka D, Honma Y, Yamada Y, Furuta K, Gunji T, Ohta H, Okamoto H, Sonoda H, et al. Circulating exosomal microRNAs as biomarkers of colon cancer. Plos One. 2014;9:e92921. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bretthauer M. Evidence for colorectal cancer screening. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2010;24:417–425. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Atkin WS, Edwards R, Kralj-Hans I, Wooldrage K, Hart AR, Northover J, Parkin DM, Wardle J, Duffy SW, Cuzick J. UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Trial Investigators: Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: A multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375:1624–1633. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60551-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chen CC, Yang SH, Lin JK, Lin TC, Chen WS, Jiang JK, Wang HS, Chang SC. Is it reasonable to add preoperative serum level of CEA and CA19-9 to staging for colorectal cancer? J Surg Res. 2005;124:169–174. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2004.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Garzon R, Calin GA, Croce CM. MicroRNAs in cancer. Annu Rev Med. 2009;60:167–179. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.59.053006.104707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fabian MR, Sonenberg N, Filipowicz W. Regulation of mRNA translation and stability by microRNAs. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:351–379. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060308-103103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Esquela-Kerscher A, Slack FJ. Oncomirs-microRNAs with a role in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:259–269. doi: 10.1038/nrc1840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mencía A, Modamio-Høybjør S, Redshaw N, Morín M, Mayo-Merino F, Olavarrieta L, Aguirre LA, del Castillo I, Steel KP, Dalmay T, et al. Mutations in the seed region of human miR-96 are responsible for nonsyndromic progressive hearing loss. Nat Genet. 2009;41:609–613. doi: 10.1038/ng.355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Asangani IA, Rasheed SA, Nikolova DA, Leupold JH, Colburn NH, Post S, Allgayer H. MicroRNA-21 (miR-21) post-transcriptionally downregulates tumor suppressor Pdcd4 and stimulates invasion, intravasation and metastasis in colorectal cancer. Oncogene. 2008;27:2128–2136. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Li H, Xie S, Liu M, Chen Z, Liu X, Wang L, Li D, Zhou Y. The clinical significance of downregulation of mir-124-3p, mir-146a-5p, mir-155-5p and mir-335-5p in gastric cancer tumorigenesis. Int J Oncol. 2014;45:197–208. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2014.2415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cao J, Cai J, Huang D, Han Q, Yang Q, Li T, Ding H, Wang Z. miR-335 represents an invasion suppressor gene in ovarian cancer by targeting Bcl-w. Oncol Rep. 2013;30:701–706. doi: 10.3892/or.2013.2482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sun Z, Zhang Z, Liu Z, Qiu B, Liu K, Dong G. MicroRNA-335 inhibits invasion and metastasis of colorectal cancer by targeting ZEB2. Med Oncol. 2014;31:982. doi: 10.1007/s12032-014-0982-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Farh KK, Grimson A, Jan C, Lewis BP, Johnston WK, Lim LP, Burge CB, Bartel DP. The widespread impact of mammalian MicroRNAs on mRNA repression and evolution. Science. 2005;310:1817–1821. doi: 10.1126/science.1121158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Baskerville S, Bartel DP. Microarray profiling of microRNAs reveals frequent coexpression with neighboring miRNAs and host genes. RNA. 2005;11:241–247. doi: 10.1261/rna.7240905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Volinia S, Calin GA, Liu CG, Ambs S, Cimmino A, Petrocca F, Visone R, Iorio M, Roldo C, Ferracin M, et al. A microRNA expression signature of human solid tumors defines cancer gene targets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:2257–2261. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510565103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lu J, Getz G, Miska EA, Alvarez-Saavedra E, Lamb J, Peck D, Sweet-Cordero A, Ebert BL, Mak RH, Ferrando AA, et al. MicroRNA expression profiles classify human cancers. Nature. 2005;435:834–838. doi: 10.1038/nature03702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Montecalvo A, Larregina AT, Shufesky WJ, Stolz DB, Sullivan ML, Karlsson JM, Baty CJ, Gibson GA, Erdos G, Wang Z, et al. Mechanism of transfer of functional microRNAs between mouse dendritic cells via exosomes. Blood. 2012;119:756–766. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-02-338004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ogawa Y, Kanai-Azuma M, Akimoto Y, Kawakami H, Yanoshita R. Exosome-like vesicles with dipeptidyl peptidase IV in human saliva. Biol Pharm Bull. 2008;31:1059–1062. doi: 10.1248/bpb.31.1059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hu G, Drescher KM, Chen XM. Exosomal miRNAs: Biological properties and therapeutic potential. Front Genet. 2012;3:56. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2012.00056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Théry C, Ostrowski M, Segura E. Membrane vesicles as conveyors of immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9:581–593. doi: 10.1038/nri2567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pegtel DM, Cosmopoulos K, Thorley-Lawson DA, van Eijndhoven MA, Hopmans ES, Lindenberg JL, de Gruijl TD, Würdinger T, Middeldorp JM. Functional delivery of viral miRNAs via exosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:6328–6333. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914843107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Skog J, Würdinger T, van Rijn S, Meijer DH, Gainche L, Sena-Esteves M, Curry WT, Jr, Carter BS, Krichevsky AM, Breakefield XO. Glioblastoma microvesicles transport RNA and proteins that promote tumour growth and provide diagnostic biomarkers. Nat Cell Biol. 2008;10:1470–1476. doi: 10.1038/ncb1800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Igaz I, Igaz P. Tumor surveillance by circulating microRNAs: A hypothesis. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2014;71:4081–4087. doi: 10.1007/s00018-014-1682-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Smyth GK. Limma: Linear models for microarray data. In: Gentleman R, Carey V, Dudoit S, Irizarry R, Huber W, editors. Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Solutions using R and Bioconductor. Springer; New York, PA: 2005. pp. 397–420. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Xiao F, Zuo Z, Cai G, Kang S, Gao X, Li T. miRecords: An integrated resource for microRNA-target interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:D105–D110. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn851. (Database Issue) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dweep H, Sticht C, Pandey P, Gretz N. miRWalk-database: Prediction of possible miRNA binding sites by ‘walking’ the genes of three genomes. J Biomed Inform. 2011;44:839–847. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2011.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Huangda W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Bioinformatics enrichment tools: Paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:1–13. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hulsegge I, Kommadath A, Smits MA. Globaltest and GOEAST: Two different approaches for gene ontology analysis. BMC Proc. 2009;3(Suppl 4):S10. doi: 10.1186/1753-6561-3-s4-s10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kanehisa M. The KEGG database. Novartis Found Symp. 2002;247:91–101. doi: 10.1002/0470857897.ch8. discussion 101–103, 119–128, 244–252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Huangda W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 2009;4:44–57. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Franceschini A, Szklarczyk D, Frankild S, Kuhn M, Simonovic M, Roth A, Lin J, Minguez P, Bork P, von Mering C, Jensen LJ. STRING v9. 1: Protein-protein interaction networks, with increased coverage and integration. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D808–D815. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1094. (Database Issue) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Patil A, Nakamura H. Filtering high-throughput protein-protein interaction data using a combination of genomic features. BMC Bioinformatics. 2005;6:100. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-6-100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Takahashi M, Sung B, Shen Y, Hur K, Link A, Boland CR, Aggarwal BB, Goel A. Boswellic acid exerts antitumor effects in colorectal cancer cells by modulating expression of the let-7 and miR-200 microRNA family. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33:2441–2449. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgs286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chen F, Chen C, Yang S, Gong W, Wang Y, Cianflone K, Tang J, Wang DW. Let-7b inhibits human cancer phenotype by targeting cytochrome P450 epoxygenase 2J2. Plos One. 2012;7:e39197. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Yan X, Liang H, Deng T, Zhu K, Zhang S, Wang N, Jiang X, Wang X, Liu R, Zen K, et al. The identification of novel targets of miR-16 and characterization of their biological functions in cancer cells. Mol Cancer. 2013;12:92. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-12-92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ma Q, Wang X, Li Z, Li B, Ma F, Peng L, Zhang Y, Xu A, Jiang B. microRNA-16 represses colorectal cancer cell growth in vitro by regulating the p53/survivin signaling pathway. Oncol Rep. 2013;29:1652–1658. doi: 10.3892/or.2013.2262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Yang Y, Wang F, Shi C, Zou Y, Qin H, Ma Y. Cyclin D1 G870A polymorphism contributes to colorectal cancer susceptibility: Evidence from a systematic review of 22 case-control studies. Plos One. 2012;7:e36813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Probst-Hensch NM, Sun CL, Van Den Berg D, Ceschi M, Koh WP, Yu MC. The effect of the cyclin D1 (CCND1) A870G polymorphism on colorectal cancer risk is modified by glutathione-S-transferase polymorphisms and isothiocyanate intake in the Singapore Chinese Health Study. Carcinogenesis. 2006;27:2475–2482. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgl116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Liu Q, Fu H, Sun F, Zhang H, Tie Y, Zhu J, Xing R, Sun Z, Zheng X. miR-16 family induces cell cycle arrest by regulating multiple cell cycle genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:5391–5404. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Schultz J, Lorenz P, Gross G, Ibrahim S, Kunz M. MicroRNA let-7b targets important cell cycle molecules in malignant melanoma cells and interferes with anchorage-independent growth. Cell Res. 2008;18:549–557. doi: 10.1038/cr.2008.45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wu J, Ji X, Zhu L, Jiang Q, Wen Z, Xu S, Shao W, Cai J, Du Q, Zhu Y, Mao J. Up-regulation of microRNA-1290 impairs cytokinesis and affects the reprogramming of colon cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 2013;329:155–163. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2012.10.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Behrens J. The role of the Wnt signalling pathway in colorectal tumorigenesis. Biochem Soc Trans. 2005;33:672–675. doi: 10.1042/BST0330672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Karim RZ, Tse GM, Putti TC, Scolyer RA, Lee CS. The significance of the Wnt pathway in the pathology of human cancers. Pathology. 2004;36:120–128. doi: 10.1080/00313020410001671957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zeller KI, Jegga AG, Aronow BJ, O'Donnell KA, Dang CV. An integrated database of genes responsive to the Myc oncogenic transcription factor: Identification of direct genomic targets. Genome Biol. 2003;4:R69. doi: 10.1186/gb-2003-4-10-r69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Pelengaris S, Khan M, Evan G. c-MYC: More than just a matter of life and death. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:764–776. doi: 10.1038/nrc904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.González V, Hurley LH. The c-MYC NHE III(1): Function and regulation. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2010;50:111–129. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.48.113006.094649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hermeking H. The MYC oncogene as a cancer drug target. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2003;3:163–175. doi: 10.2174/1568009033481949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Li XM, Wang AM, Zhang J, Yi H. Down-regulation of miR-126 expression in colorectal cancer and its clinical significance. Med Oncol. 2011;28:1054–1057. doi: 10.1007/s12032-010-9637-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Zhang Y, Wang X, Xu B, Wang B, Wang Z, Liang Y, Zhou J, Hu J, Jiang B. Epigenetic silencing of miR-126 contributes to tumor invasion and angiogenesis in colorectal cancer. Oncol Rep. 2013;30:1976–1984. doi: 10.3892/or.2013.2633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Liu P, Cheng H, Roberts TM, Zhao JJ. Targeting the phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway in cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2009;8:627–644. doi: 10.1038/nrd2926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zhu N, Zhang D, Xie H, Zhou Z, Chen H, Hu T, Bai Y, Shen Y, Yuan W, Jing Q, Qin Y. Endothelial-specific intron-derived miR-126 is down-regulated in human breast cancer and targets both VEGFA and PIK3R2. Mol Cell Biochem. 2011;351:157–164. doi: 10.1007/s11010-011-0723-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kang HY, Lin HK, Hu YC, Yeh S, Huang KE, Chang C. From transforming growth factor-beta signaling to androgen action: Identification of Smad3 as an androgen receptor coregulator in prostate cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:3018–3023. doi: 10.1073/pnas.061305498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Bierie B, Moses HL. TGF-beta and cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2006;17:29–40. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2005.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Han SU, Kim HT, Seong DH, Kim YS, Park YS, Bang YJ, Yang HK, Kim SJ. Loss of the Smad3 expression increases susceptibility to tumorigenicity in human gastric cancer. Oncogene. 2004;23:1333–1341. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Liu G, Fang Y, Zhang H, Li Y, Li X, Yu J, Wang X. Computational identification and microarray-based validation of microRNAs in Oryctolagus cuniculus. Mol Biol Rep. 2010;37:3575–3581. doi: 10.1007/s11033-010-0006-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Oncology Letters are provided here courtesy of Spandidos Publications

RESOURCES