Skip to main content
PMC home page
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology logoLink to Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
. 2016 Sep 28;6:113. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00113

The Membrane Protein LasM Promotes the Culturability of Legionella pneumophila in Water

Laam Li 1, Sébastien P Faucher 1,*
PMCID: PMC5039212  PMID: 27734007

Abstract

The water-borne pathogen Legionella pneumophila (Lp) strongly expresses the lpg1659 gene in water. This gene encodes a hypothetical protein predicted to be a membrane protein using in silico analysis. While no conserved domains were identified in Lpg1659, similar proteins are found in many Legionella species and other aquatic bacteria. RT-qPCR showed that lpg1659 is positively regulated by the alternative sigma factor RpoS, which is essential for Lp to survive in water. These observations suggest an important role of this novel protein in the survival of Lp in water. Deletion of lpg1659 did not affect cell morphology, membrane integrity or tolerance to high temperature. Moreover, lpg1659 was dispensable for growth of Lp in rich medium, and during infection of the amoeba Acanthamoeba castellanii and of THP-1 human macrophages. However, deletion of lpg1659 resulted in an early loss of culturability in water, while over-expression of this gene promoted the culturability of Lp. Therefore, these results suggest that lpg1659 is required for Lp to maintain culturability, and possibly long-term survival, in water. Since the loss of culturability observed in the absence of Lpg1659 was complemented by the addition of trace metals into water, this membrane protein is likely a transporter for acquiring essential trace metal for maintaining culturability in water and potentially in other metal-deprived conditions. Given its role in the survival of Lp in water, Lpg1659 was named LasM for Legionella aquatic survival membrane protein.

Keywords: Legionella pneumophila, freshwater, survival, lpg1659, membrane protein, metal transporter

Introduction

Legionella pneumophila (Lp) is a water-borne opportunistic pathogen that can infect human alveolar macrophages, resulting in a severe form of pneumonia called Legionnaires' disease (Fields et al., 2002). Recent years have seen an increase in the incidence of sporadic cases and outbreaks of Legionnaires' disease around the world, mostly associated with Legionella-contaminated man-made water systems (European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, 2013; Phin et al., 2014). Since the major mode of transmission is through water, the dynamics of Lp in freshwater have been studied extensively. It is known that Lp replicates only in the presence of sufficient nutrients or permissive hosts (Fields et al., 2002). Under nutrient limitation, Lp can survive for a prolonged period of time, up to 1.5 years in some cases, in varying compositions of freshwater including tap water, drinking water and creek water (Skaliy and McEachern, 1979; Schofield, 1985; Lee and West, 1991; Paszko-Kolva et al., 1992; Söderberg et al., 2008).

In an artificial freshwater model, Fraquil, Lp had less than a 1-log reduction in CFU counts after 20 weeks at 25°C (Li et al., 2015; Mendis et al., 2015). Moreover, Lp can survive for several months under a range of temperatures, pH and trace metal concentrations and remain infectious more than 6 months after exposure to Fraquil (Mendis et al., 2015). This ability for long-term survival in different kinds of water and under different conditions allows Lp to colonize water systems, and persist until it encounters a suitable host.

A limited number of studies have identified genes that are important for the survival of Lp in water. Söderberg et al. (2008) found that lspD, lspE, lspF, and pilD, which encode components of the virulence-related type II secretion system, are necessary for Lp to survive in water at temperatures below 17°C. In addition, the alternative sigma factor RpoS, as well as the stringent response regulators RelA and SpoT are required for the survival of Lp in water at 25°C (Trigui et al., 2014). In order to identify additional genes contributing to survival in water, we previously conducted a microarray analysis comparing the transcriptome of Lp exposed to water to that of Lp grown in rich medium (Li et al., 2015). Since bacteria tend to respond to environmental changes via transcriptomic reorganization (Ishihama, 2000; Hecker et al., 2009), genes that are highly up-regulated upon water exposure could be crucial for the successful adaptation and survival of Lp in water systems. Using this approach, we found that one highly up-regulated gene, bdhA, encoding 3-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase, is important for the long-term survival of Lp in water at 37°C (Li et al., 2015).

Due to the success of this approach, we selected another highly up-regulated gene, lpg1659, for further characterization. lpg1659 was significantly up-regulated in Lp exposed to water for 2 and 6 h (Li et al., 2015). No previous studies have characterized lpg1659, which encodes a hypothetical protein with no putative functions. Nevertheless, we found that this protein is highly conserved in many Legionella species, as well as other aquatic bacteria. Therefore, we hypothesized that lpg1659 is important for Lp to survive in freshwater. A deletion mutant of lpg1659 was used to better understand its role with respect to cell structure, survival in water and growth of Lp. We found that Lpg1659 plays a role in the long-term culturability of Lp upon water exposure at 37 and 42°C. Evidence presented here suggests that it likely acts as an ion transporter, facilitating the uptake of one or more essential trace metal ions. Based on our results, the lpg1659 gene was named lasM for Legionella aquatic survival membrane protein.

Methods

Bacterial strains and culture conditions

All Lp strains used in this study were constructed from JR32, a streptomycin resistant derivative of Lp Philadelphia-1 (Sadosky et al., 1993). The constitutively competent KS79 strain, derived from JR32, was used for the construction of the lpg1659 mutant strain (de Felipe et al., 2008). Unless specified otherwise, Lp was grown on ACES-Buffered Charcoal Yeast Extract agar supplemented with 0.4 mg ml−1 L-cysteine, 0.25 mg ml−1 ferric pyrophosphate and 0.1% α-ketoglutarate (i.e., BCYEα agar) at 37°C for 3 days (Feeley et al., 1979; Edelstein, 1981). This medium was further supplemented with 25 μg ml−1 kanamycin or 5 μg ml−1 chloramphenicol, when necessary. Escherichia coli strains derived from DH5α were grown on Luria-Bertani agar at 37°C overnight and was supplemented with 25 μg ml−1 chloramphenicol, when necessary. Descriptions of the bacterial strains used in this study can be found in Table 1.

Table 1.

Bacterial strains used in this study.

Name Relevant genotype References
LEGIONELLA PNEUMOPHILA
JR32 r−m+, SmR Sadosky et al., 1993
KS79 (WT) JR32 ΔcomR de Felipe et al., 2008
LELA3118 (dotA mutant) JR32 dotA::Tn903dIIlacZ Sadosky et al., 1993
LM1376 (rpoS mutant) JR32 rpoS::Tn903dGent, GmR Hales and Shuman, 1999
SPF176 (prpoS) LM1376 pSF49 Trigui et al., 2014
SPF248 (ΔlasM) KS79 Δlpg1659, KnR This work
SPF294 (ΔlasM+plasM) SPF248 pSF83, KnRCmR This work
SPF298 (WT+plasMi) KS79 pSF73, CmR This work
ESCHERICHIA COLI
DH5α supE44 ΔlacU169 (Φ80 lacZΔM15) hsdR17 recA1 endA1 gyrA96 thi-1 relA1 Invitrogen
pMMB207C DH5α, ΔmobA, CmR Charpentier et al., 2008
pSF6 DH5α, pGEMT-easy-rrnb Faucher et al., 2011
pSF49 DH5α, pMMB207C-ptac-rpoS, CmR Trigui et al., 2014
pSF73 DH5α, pMMB207C-ptac-lpg1659, CmR This work
pSF83 DH5α, pXDC39-plpg1659-lpg1659, CmR This work
pXDC39 DH5α, pMMB207c, ΔPtac, ΔlacI, CmR Xavier Charpentier
Open in a new tab

Construction of mutant, complemented, and over-expression strains

To construct the lpg1659 deletion mutant strain SPF248 (ΔlasM), 1 kb length sequences upstream and downstream of lpg1659 were first amplified from the wild-type (WT) strain KS79 by PCR using Taq polymerase (Invitrogen), with the primer sets 1659_UpF/1659_UpR and 1659_DownF/1659_DownR, respectively. The kanamycin cassette was amplified from pSF6 with the primer set Kn-F/Kn-R, purified and further amplified with the primer set 1659_KnF/1659_KnR to obtain a 1 kb kanamycin fragment where the 5′ end is complementary to the 3′ end of the upstream fragment, and 3′ end is complementary to the 5′ end of downstream fragment. A 3 kb mutant allele was amplified using the three 1 kb fragments as template, Phusion DNA polymerase (NEB) and the primer set 1659_UpF/1659_DownR. The purified amplicon was then introduced into KS79 through natural transformation (de Felipe et al., 2008). The recombinants were selected for kanamycin resistance, and successful replacement of the target gene by the kanamycin cassette was validated by PCR.

To construct the pSF83 plasmid (plasM) for complementation, the target gene lpg1659 together with 500 bp region upstream of the translation start site was amplified from KS79 using the primer set Com1659F2_SacI/Com1659R_XbaI. The amplicon and the plasmid pXDC39 were both digested with SacI and XbaI (NEB) and ligated using T4 DNA ligase (NEB). The ligation mixture was transformed into competent E. coli DH5α and the transformants were selected for chloramphenicol resistance. Correct insertion of the amplicon in the plasmid extracted from transformants was validated by PCR using the primer set pXDC39-F/Com1659R_XbaI. This pSF83 plasmid was then introduced into the mutant strain ΔlasM by electroporation as described previously (Chen et al., 2006), so as to construct the complemented strain SPF294 (ΔlasM+plasM). The recombinants were selected for kanamycin and chloramphenicol resistance before validation by PCR.

To construct the pSF73 plasmid (plasMi) for over-expression, the target gene lpg1659 was first amplified from KS79 using the primer set Com1659F_SacI/Com1659R_XbaI. The amplicon and the plasmid pMMB207c were both digested with SacI and XbaI (NEB) and ligated with T4 DNA ligase (NEB). The ligation mixture was transformed into competent E. coli DH5α and the transformants were selected for chloramphenicol resistance. The presence of the insert (lpg1659) in the plasmid extracted from transformants was validated by PCR using the primer set PromF/Com1659R_XbaI. This pSF73 plasmid was then introduced into KS79 by electroporation in order to construct the over-expression strain SPF298 (WT+plasMi). The recombinants were selected for kanamycin and chloramphenicol resistance before validation by PCR. The primer sequences are listed in Table 2.

Table 2.

Primer sequences used in this study.

Name Sequence (5′–3′)*
1659_UpF CAATCAGAACAAGGTGTGTATGG
1659_UpR CAGTCTAGCTATCGCCATGTACGATGAGTACTGAATTCCTGC
1659_DownF GATGCTGAAGATCAGTTGGGTCACGTCCTATCACATTCTATTACTC
1659_DownR AGATCGATGAAGGCTTGTAGC
1659_KnF GCAGGAATTCAGTACTCATCGTACATGGCGATAGCTAGACTG
1659_KnR GAGTAATAGAATGTGATAGGACGTGACCCAACTGATCTTCAGCATC
1659_QF CGGTCACTCTTTGGTATATGTC
1659_QR CTGATTGACTGGATCGAACATC
16s_QF AGAGATGCATTAGTGCCTTCGGGA
16s_QR ACTAAGGATAAGGGTTGCGCTCGT
Com1659F_SacI CCGGAGCTCGCAGGAATTCAGTACTCATCG
Com1659F2_SacI CCGGAGCTCCACCTTTCAGATTGTTAGTCGC
Com1659R_XbaI CGCTCTAGAGAGTAATAGAATGTGATAGGACG
Kn-F TACATGGCGATAGCTAGACTG
Kn-R ACCCAACTGATCTTCAGCATC
pXDC39-F GCTTCCACAGCAATGGCATCC
PromF CGTATAATGTGTGGAATTGTGAG
Open in a new tab
*

The underlined bases indicate restriction sites.

RT-qPCR

JR32, the rpoS mutant and the complemented strain SPF176 were first suspended in ACES-buffered Yeast Extract (AYE) broth at an initial OD600 of 0.1. Fifty milliliter cultures of JR32, rpoS mutant, SPF176 (prpoS OFF) and SPF176 induced with 0.5 mM IPTG (prpoS ON) were grown in 250 ml Erlenmeyer flasks at 37°C shaking (250 rpm) to exponential phase (OD600 of 1.0). Each culture was then centrifuged and washed with Fraquil three times before suspending in Fraquil to an OD600 of 1.0. Fraquil is an artificial freshwater medium that does not support growth but allows long-term survival of Lp (Li et al., 2015; Mendis et al., 2015). The composition of Fraquil is 0.25 μM CaCl2, 0.15 μM MgSO4, 0.15 μM NaHCO3, 10 nM K2HPO4, 0.1 μM NaNO3, 10 nM FeCl3, 1 nM CuSO4, 0.22 nM (NH4)6Mo7O24, 2.5 nM CoCl2, 23 nM MnCl2, and 4 nM ZnSO4 in ultra-pure Milli-Q water (Morel et al., 1975). Thirty milliliter of each suspension was transferred to 125 ml Erlenmeyer flask and incubated at 37°C shaking for 6 h. Samples were then collected and RNA was extracted as described previously (Li et al., 2015). One microgram of purified RNA was used for reverse transcription reactions along with a negative control without reverse transcriptase. For qPCR reactions, the 16S rRNA gene-specific primer set 16s_QF/16s_QF and the lpg1659 gene-specific primer set 1659_QF/1659_QR were designed with the IDT primer design software (https://www.idtdna.com/Primerquest/), and their amplification efficiency were proven to be >85% (data not shown). qPCR was performed on an iQ™5 Multicolor Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad) using iTaq universal SYBR green supermix (Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The 16SrRNA gene was used as the reference gene to normalize the data. Fold change was calculated as described previously (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001) and are presented as log2 ratios.

Bioinformatics analysis

The hypothetical protein (accession number: YP_095686.1) encoded by lasM was compared to proteins encoded by other bacteria using Standard Protein BLAST (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi?PAGE=Proteins). The NCBI CD-search was used to identify any conserved domains present in the LasM protein. Three servers from the CBS Prediction Servers (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/) were then used to predict the putative function(s) of LasM. First, TMHMM Server v.2.0 was used to predict transmembrane helices (Sonnhammer et al., 1998; Krogh et al., 2001). Second, SignalP 4.1 Server was used to predict the presence and location of signal peptides (Petersen et al., 2011). Lastly, ProtFun 2.2 Server was used to predict cellular role, enzyme class as well as the gene ontology category based on the amino acid sequence (Jensen et al., 2002, 2003).

Microscopic examination of cell morphology

The WT strain KS79 and the mutant strain ΔlasM were suspended in Fraquil at an OD600 of 1.0. Immediately after suspension, a wet mount was prepared and viewed at 1000 × magnification using digital microscopy (Nikon Eclipse 80i). Images of 10 random microscopic fields were captured for each strain using the NIS Element software (Nikon Instruments, Inc.). The length of 10 cells in each image was estimated using the ImageJ software in order to determine the average cell length.

Extracellular growth assay

The KS79 and ΔlasM strains were suspended in AYE broth at an OD600 of 0.1. Twenty-five ml of each culture was transferred into three 125 ml Erlenmeyer flasks and grown at 37°C shaking. The OD600 of each culture was measured by a spectrophotometer once every 4 h for a period of 32 h.

Cell lines and infection assays

The amoeba Acanthamoeba castellanii was grown to confluence in 20 ml of PYG broth (Moffat and Tompkins, 1992) in a 75 cm2 tissue culture flask (Sarstedt) at 30°C. Before infection with Lp, the old medium with non-adherent amoebae was replaced with 10 ml of fresh PYG broth. The flask was then shaken sharply to release the adherent amoebae into the medium. This suspension was enumerated and diluted to 5 × 105 cells per ml. One ml was placed into each well of a 24-well plate (Sarstedt). The amoebae were allowed to adhere for 2 h before the medium was replaced with Ac buffer, which does not support the growth of Lp (Moffat and Tompkins, 1992). The plate was incubated at 30°C for another 2 h before infection.

The human monocyte-like cell line THP-1 was grown in 30 ml of RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 2 mM glutamine at 37°C under 5% CO2 (Kim et al., 2009). Three days prior to infection, 1 ml of THP-1 culture (5 × 105 cells per ml) was placed into each well of a 24-well plate (Sarstedt) and treated with 1 × 10−7 M phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) (Fisher Scientific) to induce maturation toward adherent macrophage-like cells. Subsequently, the medium was replaced by fresh RPMI without PMA 2 h before infection with Lp.

For the infection assays, the KS79, ΔlasM, and dotA mutant were suspended in AYE broth at an OD600 of 0.1 and then, diluted 10-fold to approximately 2.5 × 106 cells per ml. The dotA mutant is defective for intracellular growth (Roy and Isberg, 1997) and was used as a negative control. Two microliter of each bacterial suspension was added to three replicate wells of A. castellanii and THP-1 cells, resulting in an MOI of 0.1. The A. castellanii infection plate was incubated at 30°C and the intracellular growth of each strain was determined by CFU counts on BCYEα agar at 24 h intervals for 7 days; whereas the THP-1 infection plate was incubated at 37°C under 5% CO2, and the intracellular growth was monitored at 24 h intervals for 5 days.

Survival assays in water

Strains grown on BCYEα agar were washed three times with Fraquil and suspended in fresh Fraquil at an OD600 of 0.1. One milliliter of bacterial suspension was added to 4 ml of fresh Fraquil in a 25 cm2 plastic flask (Sarstedt). For each strain, three replicate flasks were incubated at 25, 37, and 42°C, and CFU counts were measured once per 3 weeks, once per 2 weeks and once per week, respectively. In addition, membrane integrity of the samples incubated at 42°C for 7 weeks was determined by Live/Dead staining and flow cytometry, using freshly grown KS79 as the live control and KS79 boiled in a water bath for 10 min as the dead control, as described previously (Li et al., 2015).

For the survival assay using Fraquil containing10 times trace metals, the final salt and trace metal concentration is 0.25 μM CaCl2, 0.15 μM MgSO4, 0.15 μM NaHCO3, 10 nM K2HPO4, 0.1 μM NaNO3, 0.1 μM FeCl3, 10 nM CuSO4, 2.2 nM (NH4)6Mo7O24, 25 nM CoCl2, 0.23 μM MnCl2, and 40 nM ZnSO4.

Heat tolerance assays

To test tolerance to heat shock, the KS79 and ΔlasM strains were suspended in Fraquil at an OD600 of 0.1. One ml of each strain was aliquoted into 13 ml tubes (Sarstedt) in triplicate. Tubes were acclimated to 25°C for 24 h and then, transferred into a water bath set to 55°C. Samples were taken before, after 0.5 h and after 1 h of heat shock to determine the changes in CFU counts.

To test growth at an elevated temperature, the KS79 and ΔlasM strains were suspended in AYE broth at an OD600 of 0.1. Twenty-five milliliter of each culture was transferred into three 125 ml Erlenmeyer flasks and grown at 42°C shaking. The CFU of each strain was monitored daily.

Results

lasM is positively regulated by RpoS in water

In a previous study, we found that lasM was significantly up-regulated by more than 6-fold after 2 h (Log2 ratio = 2.66) and 24-fold after 6 h (Log2 ratio = 4.60) of exposure to water when compared to a control grown in rich medium (Figure 1A; Li et al., 2015). RpoS is an alternative sigma factor and a stress response regulator important for the survival of Lp in water (Trigui et al., 2014). In order to test whether the expression of lasM is controlled by RpoS, RT-qPCR was performed using RNA from the WT, rpoS mutant and complemented strains that were exposed to water. The fold change of the lasM transcript upon water exposure was lower in the rpoS mutant compared to the WT, reflected in the negative Log2 ratio of −1.3 (Figure 1B). In contrast, induction of RpoS expression in the mutant (prpoS ON) resulted in a positive Log2 ratio of 0.8, indicative of an increase in lasM expression, when compared to its non-induced counterpart (prpoS OFF). Taken together, these results suggest that the expression of lasM is positively regulated by RpoS in water.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

LasM is expressed in water and is regulated by RpoS. (A) The expression of lasM based on a transcriptomic analysis of the WT JR32 strain exposed to water for 2, 6, and 24 h compared to the control grown to exponential phase in rich medium (adapted from Li et al., 2015 published under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). (B) The RpoS-dependant regulation of lasM in Lp exposed to water for 6 h was assessed by RT-qPCR. The expression of lasM in the rpoS mutant was compared to that in the WT strain. The expression of lasM in the complemented strain where rpoS is induced with 0.5 mM IPTG (prpoS ON) was compared to that of the non-induced complement (prpoS OFF). One-tailed unpaired Student's t-test was used to assess significant differences between the two ratios (***p < 0.0005). Data shown are the mean and SD of 3 biological replicates.

LasM is a conserved protein found in aquatic bacteria

According to the NCBI Protein database, the hypothetical protein encoded by lasM is composed of 347 amino acids. Standard Protein BLAST revealed that LasM found in the Philadelphia-1 strain of Lp is highly conserved in other strains, such as Paris, Corby, Alcoy and Lens (≥98% identity). Other Legionella species that contain a LasM homolog include L. norrlandica (87% identity), L. moravica (77% identity), L. tucsonensis (76% identity), and L. longbeachae (68% identity). LasM also shares significant homology (61–63% identity) with hypothetical or membrane proteins found in Methylophaga nitratireducenticrescens, Methylophaga lonarensis, Moritella dasanensis, Endozoicomonas elysicola, Colwellia psychrerythraea, Marinobacter santoriniensis among others. These bacteria were isolated from various aquatic environments, such as water treatment systems, soda lakes and the Arctic Ocean (Kurahashi and Yokota, 2007; Kim et al., 2008; Handley et al., 2009; Antony et al., 2012; Villeneuve et al., 2013). Therefore, the protein sequence homology suggests that LasM is a conserved protein found not only in Legionella species, but also in other aquatic bacteria.

Since LasM does not harbor any conserved domains, in silico analysis was performed using the CBS Prediction Servers to predict its putative function(s). Eight transmembrane helices were predicted using the TMHMM server (Figure 2), suggesting that LasM is a transmembrane protein. Moreover, its N-terminal is likely to be located on the cytoplasmic side of the membrane (p = 0.99911). No potential signal peptides were identified using the SignalP Server, suggesting that LasM is located in the cytoplasmic membrane. The ProtFun Server predicted LasM to be a non-enzyme (p = 0.809) involved in “Transport and Binding” (p = 0.740), most likely to be a transporter (p = 0.409) among 14 different Gene Ontology categories. Our in silico analysis suggests that LasM is a conserved membrane protein, that may be involved in the transport of an unknown substance as part of its aquatic lifestyle.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

TMHMM posterior probability for LasM. The sequence of LasM was analyzed by TMHMM Server v.2.0. The segmented line on top summarizes the most probable location of the sequence. The lower part shows the probability of belonging to different locations. Red indicates transmembrane regions, blue indicates intracellular portions of the protein and pink indicates extracellular portions.

Deletion of lasM does not affect cellular morphology

Since LasM is predicted to be a membrane protein, we investigated whether the deletion of lasM would alter the cellular morphology of Lp. Microscopic analysis of wet mounts of 3 days old culture suspended in Fraquil shows that both the WT and the lasM deletion mutant are rod shaped cells of comparable size (Figures 3A,B). Statistical analysis confirms that there were no significant differences (p = 0.1659) between the cell lengths of the two strains (Figure 3C). These results indicate that the absence of LasM in Lp does not affect cell shape or cell size.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Deletion of lasM does not affect cell morphology or cell size. A wet mount image of (A) the WT strain and (B) ΔlasM was observed under 1000 × magnification. (C) The cell length of the WT strain and ΔlasM was estimated using ImageJ. Data shown are the mean and SD of the length of 10 cells per microscopic image in 10 analyzed images (n = 100).

LasM is dispensable for growth in vitro and in vivo

Growth and infection assays were performed to investigate the potential role of LasM in extracellular and intracellular growth. The WT and ΔlasM strains produced similar growth curves in rich medium, suggesting that lasM is dispensable for the growth of Lp in vitro (Figure 4A). The lag phase of both strains lasted 8 h and exponential growth occurred between 8 and 20 h, followed by a late post-exponential/stationary phase.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Deletion of lasM does not affect the growth of Lp in vitro and in vivo. (A) Optical density at 600 nm of the WT and ΔlasM strains grown in rich medium for 32 h. (B) The amoeba A. castellanii or (C) cultured THP-1 macrophages were infected with the WT strain, ΔlasM or the dotA mutant (negative control) at an MOI of 0.1. Changes in cell titer were monitored using daily CFU counts and are presented as the log ratio of the CFU on each day (CFUT) over the initial CFU (CFU0). Data shown are the mean and SD of 3 biological replicates.

CFU of the WT and ΔlasM strains increased by 4-log after 7 days of growth within the amoeba A. castellanii (Figure 4B). In contrast, both the WT and ΔlasM only produced a 2.5-log increase in CFU counts after 5 days of growth within human macrophage-like THP-1 cells (Figure 4C). As expected, the dotA mutant that served as a negative control demonstrated a reduction in CFU counts in both infection models (Figures 4B,C). No significant differences were observed between the WT and ΔlasM in both infection assays, showing that deletion of lasM does not affect the ability of Lp to infect and multiply intracellularly within A. castellanii or within THP-1 cells.

Deletion and over-expression of lasM affects the culturability of Lp in water

Since lasM is highly up-regulated in Lp exposed to water (Li et al., 2015) and positively regulated by RpoS, we hypothesized that it may be important for the survival of Lp in water. We monitored the changes in CFU counts of the WT, ΔlasM and the complemented strain (ΔlasM+plasM) during long-term exposure to water at three different temperatures. At 25°C, all three strains survived well, and no significant reduction in CFU counts was observed after 24 weeks in water (Figure 5A). In contrast, the CFU of all three strains dropped below detection limit after 22 weeks of water exposure at 37°C (Figure 5B). The ΔlasM strain had a faster reduction in CFU count and a significantly lower CFU than the WT starting at week 12. The complemented strain survived as well as the WT, suggesting that lasM is indeed important for Lp to maintain culturability in water. Similar trend was observed in the strains exposed to 42°C, where an early loss in culturability was only observed in ΔlasM but not in the WT or the complemented strain (Figure 5C). At this temperature, the CFU counts of all three strains decreased more rapidly than at 37°C, dropping below the detection limit after only 5 weeks of water exposure.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Deletion and over-expression of lasM affects the culturability of Lp in water at 37 and 42°C. The CFU counts of the WT, ΔlasM and complemented strain (ΔlasM+plasM) in water at (A) 25°C, (B) 37°C, (C) 42°C, and (D) in water with 10 times trace metals at 42°C. (E) Percentage of cells in different status after exposure to water at 42°C for 7 weeks. Live/Dead staining and flow cytometry were used to analyze 5000 cells in each replicate. Freshly grown Lp was used as the live control and heat-killed Lp was used as the dead control. (F) CFU counts of the WT strain and the over-expression strain (WT+plasMi) in water at 42°C. WT+plasMi OFF indicates that the over-expression of lasM was not induced, while WT+plasMi ON indicates that the over-expression of lasM was induced with 1 mM IPTG. Data shown are the mean and SD of 3 biological replicates. One-tailed unpaired Student's t-test was used to assess significant differences against the WT (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.005; ***p < 0.0005). DL indicates the detection limit.

Since the deletion of lasM resulted in an early loss of culturability at both 37 and 42°C, we hypothesized that over-expression of this gene in the WT would promote the culturability of Lp in water. Given that the difference in culturability between the WT and ΔlasM strains was the greatest at 42°C, the effect of lasM over-expression was tested at this temperature. A plasmid containing an inducible Ptac promoter preceding the lasM ORF was constructed and introduced into the WT strain (WT+plasMi). Under non-inducing conditions (WT+plasMi OFF), the decline in CFU counts over time was similar to the WT strain (Figure 5F). Interestingly, over-expression of LasM using IPTG (WT+plasMi ON) increased the culturability of Lp by 1 week. This further supports the notion that lasM is important for Lp to maintain culturability in water.

Deletion of lasM does not affect the culturability of Lp in water containing excess trace metals

Given that LasM was predicted to be a membrane protein involved in “transport and binding” and since it was found to be important for maintaining the culturability of Lp in water, we hypothesized that this protein could be involved in acquiring essential nutrients that are present in low amounts in water, such as trace metals. Therefore, we tested the culturability of the WT, ΔlasM and the complemented strain (ΔlasM+plasM) in water containing 10 times of trace metals at 42°C. Surprisingly, the CFU counts declined at the same rate for all three strains throughout the 7 weeks of exposure, and the mutant no longer demonstrated an early loss of culturability as observed previously (Figures 5C,D). Therefore, LasM does not alter the kinetics of culturability over time when excess trace metals are present in water.

Deletion of lasM does not affect membrane integrity of Lp exposed to water

After exposure to water at 42°C for 7 weeks, we analyzed the cell status of the WT, ΔlasM, and the complemented strain (ΔlasM+plasM) using Live/Dead staining and flow cytometry. Live/Dead staining differentiates between dead cells that have a damaged membrane and viable cells with an intact membrane. In this case, over 90% of each strain under investigation stained as viable cells, and less than 2% of each population were stained as dead (Figure 5E). This data shows that the absence of membrane protein LasM does not significantly affect the membrane integrity of Lp after exposure to water.

Deletion of lasM does not affect the tolerance of Lp to high temperature

Since early loss of culturability of the lasM mutant was only observed at 37 and 42°C but not at 25°C, we investigated whether the mutant was sensitive to elevated temperatures. First, we compared the tolerance of the WT and ΔlasM strains in water at 55°C. The CFU counts of both strains decreased to 42–47% of the initial population after 0.5 h and to 13–14% after 1 h of exposure to heat shock (Figure 6A). Increasing exposure time significantly reduced their CFU counts (p < 0.0001), but no significant differences were found between the two strains (p = 0.5605). Then, we compared the tolerance of both strains in rich medium at 42°C and, again, found no significant differences between their CFU counts over a period of 4 days (Figure 6B). Both strains grew in the first day and then their CFU counts dropped below the detection limit after 3 days. Taken together, these results suggest that deletion of lasM does not affect the tolerance of Lp to high temperature in water or in rich medium.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Deletion of lasM does not affect the tolerance of Lp to high temperature. (A) The WT strain and ΔlasM were suspended in water and exposed to 55°C for 0.5 and 1 h. The CFU counts after heat shock (CFUT) was compared to the CFU counts before heat shock (CFU0). (B) The WT strain and ΔlasM were grown in rich medium at 42°C and their daily CFU counts were monitored. Data shown are the mean and SD of 3 biological replicates. DL indicates the detection limit.

Discussion

Despite the lack of nutrients, Lp can survive in freshwater for a prolonged period of time and also remain infectious (James et al., 1999; Li et al., 2015; Mendis et al., 2015). In this study, we characterize lpg1659 (lasM), a gene that encodes a hypothetical protein with no putative functions. In silico analysis shows that lasM encodes a membrane protein that is likely involved in transport and binding. Differential expression of membrane proteins are well documented in literature. In E. coli, some membrane proteins like OmpA and general porins are constitutively expressed at high levels, whereas other membrane proteins are only expressed under specific conditions (Koebnik et al., 2000). Exposure to water at varying temperatures elicited specific changes in the outer membrane protein composition of enterohemorrhagic E. coli (Wang and Doyle, 1998). In another waterborne pathogen Leptospira interrogans, the inner membrane protein LipL31 was specifically down-regulated during exposure to distilled water, while other membrane proteins were not affected (Trueba et al., 2004). In our case, the expression of the LasM membrane protein was induced significantly after 2 and 6 h of exposure to water, compared to exponential growth in AYE (Li et al., 2015). A previous study showed that lasM is also induced in the post-exponential phase of growth (Hovel-Miner et al., 2009). Therefore, it is likely that a signal present in Fraquil and post-exponential phase, such as starvation, induces the expression of lasM. Since Lp shuts down transcription and translation 24 h after exposure to water (Trigui et al., 2014; Li et al., 2015), genes required for survival in water are likely induced during earlier time points (i.e., the adaptation period), and are subsequently repressed. For example the bdhA gene, encoding 3-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase, is required for the long-term survival of Lp in water, and follows this expression pattern (Li et al., 2015).

Since the alternative sigma factor RpoS is essential for Lp to survive in water (Trigui et al., 2014), any genes under the control of RpoS could also be involved in the survival of Lp in water. For example, bdhA is positively regulated by RpoS in water and it was found to be important for the survival of Lp in water at 37°C (Li et al., 2015). According to a previous study, lasM is positively regulated by RpoS in rich medium (Hovel-Miner et al., 2009). Here, we report that lasM is also under RpoS control when Lp is exposed to water, further suggesting an association between LasM and water survival.

Since LasM is predicted to be a membrane protein, we hypothesized that it may play a role in maintaining cell morphology or membrane integrity. However, deletion of lasM affected neither the cell shape nor size of freshly grown Lp that was suspended in water. Moreover, the membrane integrity of Lp exposed to water for 7 weeks was unaffected. We further found that deletion of lasM does not affect the ability of Lp to infect host cells such as A. castellanii and THP-1 cells. Furthermore, it does not affect the growth of Lp in vitro. This is consistent with a previous study showing that the insertion of a transposon in the lasM gene did not result in growth advantages or disadvantages in rich medium (O'Connor et al., 2011).

Nevertheless, we observed an early loss of culturability in ΔlasM exposed to water at 37 and 42°C, suggesting that lasM is important for Lp to maintain culturability in warm water. These temperatures are commonly found in man-made water systems such as cooling towers that Lp is able to colonize (Rogers et al., 1994; Darelid et al., 2002). Live/Dead staining shows that the proportion of dead cell in the ΔlasM population is comparable to that of the WT, but the mutant enters a viable but non-culturable (VBNC) state earlier than the WT. VBNC cells are in a quiescent state awaiting revival or transitioning to death (Li et al., 2014). Previous studies show that Lp that was induced into the VBNC state under certain conditions, such as starvation and exposure to disinfectants, may be resuscitated back into culturable and infectious cells using different methods (reviewed by Li et al., 2014). For example, Lp that entered the VBNC status 125 days after exposure to sterilized tap water at 20°C were resuscitated by the addition of A. castellanii (Steinert et al., 1997). However, our attempt to resuscitate the samples using the same method failed and the VBNC cells remained non-infectious (data not shown). Differences in VBNC-inducing conditions (e.g., water, temperature, etc.) and additional factors may contribute to the failure of resuscitation (reviewed by Li et al., 2014). VBNC cells that cannot be resuscitated are considered to be in the process of dying. Therefore, we conclude that ΔlasM started dying at an earlier time point than the WT when exposed to water. Given that over-expression of LasM also promotes the culturability of Lp in water, we conclude that LasM is important for the long-term survival of Lp in water at temperatures above 25°C.

Early loss of culturability was not observed in ΔlasM exposed to water at 25°C for 24 weeks. This is mirrored in a previous study where the deletion of bdhA results in an early loss of culturability and causes a survival defect in Lp exposed to water at 37°C but not at 25°C (Li et al., 2015). In both cases, it is possible that the survival defect becomes apparent at 25°C after a longer incubation period in water. Since CFU counts drop more gradually at 25°C than at 37 and 42°C (Mendis et al., 2015), any defect resulting from the deletion of an important gene may appear at a later time point at 25°C.

Environmental stresses such as heat shock are known to increase membrane fluidity and eventually result in cell damage (Beney and Gervais, 2001; Richter et al., 2010). Therefore, it is possible that LasM is important for Lp to maintain culturability at a higher temperature, not necessarily in water. If the absence of the LasM membrane protein reduced the ability of Lp to deal with heat-induced membrane damage, the mutant would produce a faster drop in CFU counts than the WT at elevated temperatures. However, we show that deletion of lasM does not affect the rate of CFU reduction in Lp exposed to water at 55°C or the CFU changes in Lp grown in rich medium at 42°C, suggesting that LasM is important for maintaining culturability in water, but that it is not directly involved in the resistance of Lp to high temperatures.

It is noteworthy that LasM was predicted to be a transporter, albeit with low probability (p = 0.409). Since the metabolic rate of Lp increases with increasing temperature (Kusnetsov et al., 1996), more energy and resources would be needed for active metabolism at higher temperatures. Therefore, if the function of LasM is to facilitate nutrient transport, then the loss of LasM could result in a more severe defect in water at 37°C or at 42°C than at 25°C. Indeed, the absence of LasM did not affect the kinetics of culturability in water with 10 times the original amount of trace metals, suggesting that the early loss of culturability previously observed in the mutant can be complemented by excess trace metals in water, namely copper, molybdenum, cobalt, manganese, zinc, sodium and iron. This finding supports our hypothesis that LasM is a transporter of one or more of the essential trace metals present in water. In the absence of this transporter, Lp might not be able to acquire sufficient trace metals from water environment to maintain culturability, and possibly long-term survival. Our data show that over-expression of lasM in Lp seems to allow better acquisition of essential trace metals, helping to maintain culturability for a longer period of time. Extra trace metals in water might also increase the amount that diffused into cells, and thus, allow the mutant lacking LasM to maintain culturability as well as the WT. It is not yet clear which trace metal is transported by LasM. Based on our experiments, LasM could transport one or a combination of copper, molybdenum, cobalt, manganese, zinc and iron.

In conclusion, this study reveals that the LasM protein is important for Lp to acquire essential trace metals in order to maintain culturability in water, which is consistent with its most probable predicted function. Our results do not ruled out the possibility that LasM could increase the fitness of L. pneumophila in other settings where the concentration of metals is low or where there is fierce competition for them, such as multi-species biofilms existing in water systems. The lasM gene is highly up-regulated in water and positively regulated by RpoS. It encodes a novel membrane protein, which is highly conserved in many Legionella species and other aquatic bacteria. We postulate that LasM is an important protein for other aquatic bacteria to maintain culturability and survival in water and in conditions presenting low concentration of metals. Absence of this protein does not affect cell morphology, membrane integrity, tolerance to high temperature or the growth of Lp, both in vitro and in vivo. Further investigation would be required to better understanding the exact trace metal(s) being transported by LasM and the underlying mechanism.

Author contributions

LL and SF conceived and designed the experiments. LL conducted the experiments and wrote the manuscript. SF contributed in writing and review of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the NSERC Discovery grant 418289-2012 and John R. Evans Leaders Fund—Funding for research infrastructure from the Canadian Foundation for Innovation to SF.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Nilmini Mendis for reviewing the manuscript and English editing.

Glossary

Abbreviations

Lp

Legionella pneumophila

VBNC

viable but non-culturable

WT

wild-type.

References

  1. Antony C. P., Doronina N. V., Boden R., Trotsenko Y. A., Shouche Y. S., Murrell J. C. (2012). Methylophaga lonarensis sp. nov., a moderately haloalkaliphilic methylotroph isolated from the soda lake sediments of a meteorite impact crater. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 62, 1613–1618. 10.1099/ijs.0.035089-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beney L., Gervais P. (2001). Influence of the fluidity of the membrane on the response of microorganisms to environmental stresses. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 57, 34–42. 10.1007/s002530100754 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Charpentier X., Faucher S. P., Kalachikov S., Shuman H. A. (2008). Loss of RNase R induces competence development in Legionella pneumophila. J. Bacteriol. 190, 8126–8136. 10.1128/JB.01035-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen D.-Q., Huang S.-S., Lu Y.-J. (2006). Efficient transformation of Legionella pneumophila by high-voltage electroporation. Microbiol. Res. 161, 246–251. 10.1016/j.micres.2005.09.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Darelid J., Löfgren S., Malmvall B. E. (2002). Control of nosocomial Legionnaires' disease by keeping the circulating hot water temperature above 55°C: experience from a 10-year surveillance programme in a district general hospital. J. Hosp. Infect. 50, 213–219. 10.1053/jhin.2002.1185 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. de Felipe K. S., Glover R. T., Charpentier X., Anderson O. R., Reyes M., Pericone C. D., et al. (2008). Legionella eukaryotic-like type IV substrates interfere with organelle trafficking. PLoS Pathogens 4:e1000117. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Edelstein P. H. (1981). Improved semiselective medium for isolation of Legionella pneumophila from contaminated clinical and environmental specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 14, 298–303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. European Centre for Disease Prevention Control (2013). Annual Epidemiological Report 2013: Reporting on 2011 Surveillance Data and 2012 Epidemic Intelligence Data. Stockholm: ECDC. [Google Scholar]
  9. Faucher S. P., Mueller C. A., Shuman H. A. (2011). Legionella pneumophila transcriptome during intracellular multiplication in human macrophages. Front. Microbiol. 2:60. 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Feeley J. C., Gibson R. J., Gorman G. W., Langford N. C., Rasheed J. K., Mackel D. C., et al. (1979). Charcoal-yeast extract agar: primary isolation medium for Legionella pneumophila. J. Clin. Microbiol. 10, 437–441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fields B. S., Benson R. F., Besser R. E. (2002). Legionella and Legionnaires' disease: 25 years of investigation. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 15, 506–526. 10.1128/CMR.15.3.506-526.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hales L. M., Shuman H. A. (1999). The Legionella pneumophila rpoS gene is required for growth within Acanthamoeba castellanii. J. Bacteriol. 181, 4879–4889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Handley K. M., Héry M., Lloyd J. R. (2009). Marinobacter santoriniensis sp. nov., an arsenate-respiring and arsenite-oxidizing bacterium isolated from hydrothermal sediment. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 59, 886–892. 10.1099/ijs.0.003145-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hecker M., Reder A., Fuchs S., Pagels M., Engelmann S. (2009). Physiological proteomics and stress/starvation responses in Bacillus subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus. Res. Microbiol. 160, 245–258. 10.1016/j.resmic.2009.03.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hovel-Miner G., Pampou S., Faucher S. P., Clarke M., Morozova I., Morozov P., et al. (2009). σS controls multiple pathways associated with intracellular multiplication of Legionella pneumophila. J. Bacteriol. 191, 2461–2473. 10.1128/JB.01578-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ishihama A. (2000). Functional modulation of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 54, 499–518. 10.1146/annurev.micro.54.1.499 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. James B. W., Mauchline W. S., Dennis P. J., Keevil C. W., Wait R. (1999). Poly-3-hydroxybutyrate in Legionella pneumophila, an energy source for survival in low-nutrient environments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65, 822–827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jensen L. J., Gupta R., Blom N., Devos D., Tamames J., Kesmir C., et al. (2002). Prediction of human protein function from post-translational modifications and localization features. J. Mol. Biol. 319, 1257–1265. 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00379-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jensen L. J., Gupta R., Stærfeldt H.-H., Brunak S. (2003). Prediction of human protein function according to Gene Ontology categories. Bioinformatics 19, 635–642. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kim E.-H., Charpentier X., Torres-Urquidy O., McEvoy M. M., Rensing C. (2009). The metal efflux island of Legionella pneumophila is not required for survival in macrophages and amoebas. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 301, 164–170. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01813.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kim H. J., Park S., Lee J. M., Park S., Jung W., Kang J.-S., et al. (2008). Moritella dasanensis sp. nov., a psychrophilic bacterium isolated from the Arctic ocean. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 58, 817–820. 10.1099/ijs.0.65501-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Koebnik R., Locher K. P., Van Gelder P. (2000). Structure and function of bacterial outer membrane proteins: barrels in a nutshell. Mol. Microbiol. 37, 239–253. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01983.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Krogh A., Larsson B., Von Heijne G., Sonnhammer E. L. L. (2001). Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J. Mol. Biol. 305, 567–580. 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kurahashi M., Yokota A. (2007). Endozoicomonas elysicola gen. nov., sp. nov., a γ-proteobacterium isolated from the sea slug Elysia ornata. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 30, 202–206. 10.1016/j.syapm.2006.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kusnetsov J. M., Ottoila E., Martikainen P. J. (1996). Growth, respiration and survival of Legionella pneumophila at high temperatures. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 81, 341–347. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1996.tb03517.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lee J., West A. (1991). Survival and growth of Legionella species in the environment. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 70, 121S–129S. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Li L., Mendis N., Trigui H., Faucher S. P. (2015). Transcriptomic changes of Legionella pneumophila in water. BMC Genomics 16:637. 10.1186/s12864-015-1869-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Li L., Mendis N., Trigui H., Oliver J. D., Faucher S. P. (2014). The importance of the viable but non-culturable state in human bacterial pathogens. Front. Microbiol. 5:258. 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00258 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Livak K. J., Schmittgen T. D. (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2ΔΔCT method. Methods 25, 402–408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mendis N., McBride P., Faucher S. P. (2015). Short-term and long-term survival and virulence of Legionella pneumophila in the defined freshwater medium Fraquil. PLoS ONE 10:e0139277. 10.1371/journal.pone.0139277 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Moffat J. F., Tompkins L. S. (1992). A quantitative model of intracellular growth of Legionella pneumophila in Acanthamoeba castellanii. Infect. Immun. 60, 296–301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Morel F. M., Westall J. C., Reuter J., Chaplick J. P. (1975). Description of the algal growth media ‘Aquil’ and ‘Fraquil’, in Technical Report 16 (Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology; ). [Google Scholar]
  33. O'Connor T. J., Adepoju Y., Boyd D., Isberg R. R. (2011). Minimization of the Legionella pneumophila genome reveals chromosomal regions involved in host range expansion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 14733–14740. 10.1073/pnas.1111678108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Paszko-Kolva C., Shahamat M., Colwell R. R. (1992). Long-term survival of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 under low-nutrient conditions and associated morphological changes. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 102, 45–55. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1992.tb05794.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Petersen T. N., Brunak S., Von Heijne G., Nielsen H. (2011). SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat. Methods 8, 785–786. 10.1038/nmeth.1701 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Phin N., Parry-Ford F., Harrison T., Stagg H. R., Zhang N., Kumar K., et al. (2014). Epidemiology and clinical management of Legionnaires' disease. Lancet Infect. Dis. 14, 1011–1021. 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70713-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Richter K., Haslbeck M., Buchner J. (2010). The heat shock response: life on the verge of death. Mol. Cell 40, 253–266. 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.10.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Rogers J., Dowsett A. B., Dennis P. J., Lee J. V., Keevil C. W. (1994). Influence of temperature and plumbing material selection on biofilm formation and growth of Legionella pneumophila in a model potable water system containing complex microbial flora. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60, 1585–1592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Roy C. R., Isberg R. R. (1997). Topology of Legionella pneumophila DotA: an inner membrane protein required for replication in macrophages. Infect. Immun. 65, 571–578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Sadosky A. B., Wiater L. A., Shuman H. A. (1993). Identification of Legionella pneumophila genes required for growth within and killing of human macrophages. Infect. Immun. 61, 5361–5373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Schofield G. M. (1985). A note on the survival of Legionella pneumophila in stagnant tap water. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 59, 333–335. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1985.tb03327.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Skaliy P., McEachern H. V. (1979). Survival of the Legionnaires' disease bacterium in water. Ann. Intern. Med. 90, 662–663. 10.7326/0003-4819-90-4-662 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Söderberg M. A., Dao J., Starkenburg S. R., Cianciotto N. P. (2008). Importance of type II secretion for survival of Legionella pneumophila in tap water and in amoebae at low temperatures. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 5583–5588. 10.1128/AEM.00067-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Sonnhammer E. L. L., von Heijne G., Krogh A. (1998). A hidden Markov model for predicting transmembrane helices in protein sequences, in ISMB 1998 Proceedings (Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press; ), 175–182. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Steinert M., Emödy L., Amann R., Hacker J. (1997). Resuscitation of viable but nonculturable Legionella pneumophila Philadelphia JR32 by Acanthamoeba castellanii. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63, 2047–2053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Trigui H., Dudyk P., Oh J., Hong J.-I., Faucher S. P. (2014). A regulatory feedback loop between RpoS and SpoT supports the survival of Legionella pneumophila in water. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81, 918–928. 10.1128/AEM.03132-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Trueba G., Zapata S., Madrid K., Cullen P., Haake D. (2004). Cell aggregation: a mechanism of pathogenic Leptospira to survive in fresh water. Int. Microbiol. 7, 35–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Villeneuve C., Martineau C., Mauffrey F., Villemur R. (2013). Methylophaga nitratireducenticrescens sp. nov. and Methylophaga frappieri sp. nov., isolated from the biofilm of the methanol-fed denitrification system treating the seawater at the Montreal Biodome. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 63, 2216–2222. 10.1099/ijs.0.044545-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wang G., Doyle M. P. (1998). Survival of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 in water. J. Food Prot. 61, 662–667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES