Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 17;32(19):2936–2946. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw361

Table 4.

Comparison of different methods on the Q306 dataset

Method γa σb P-valuec
I-Mutent3.0 0.12 2.04 3.7E-4
INPS 0.27 1.96 7.9E-4
mCSM 0.18 2.09 7.0E-2
STRUM 0.40 1.91

aγ, PCC between predicted and experiment ΔΔG.

aσ, RMSE of ΔΔG prediction in Kcal/mol.

aP-value, P-value in Wilcoxon test between the RMSE of STRUM and that by the control methods on the mutations.