Highlights
-
•
Biotransformation of crude corn oil phytosterols to 4-androstene-3, 17-dione, testosterone and boldenone.
-
•
Four strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and one of Alcaligenes aquatilis were isolated, identified and used in biotransformation process.
-
•
Determination of crude corn oil total sterols and phytosterols profile.
-
•
Optimization of boldenone production by Placket-Burman design and box-Behnken design.
-
•
Accumulation of boldenone (BOL) as the major product of the biotransformation process, and the rare reports about optimization of its production from phytosterols, make it a selected promising candidate for further optimization. The production of BOL in single step microbial biotransformation from corn oil phytosterols by P. aeruginosa was not previously reported.
Keywords: Androstenedione, Boldenone, Corn oil phytosterols, Factorial design, Pseudomonads aeruginosa
Abstract
A new potent Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolate capable for biotransformation of corn oil phytosterol (PS) to 4-androstene-3, 17-dione (AD), testosterone (T) and boldenone (BOL) was identified by phenotypic analysis and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Sequential statistical strategy was used to optimize the biotransformation process mainly concerning BOL using Factorial design and response surface methodology (RSM). The production of BOL in single step microbial biotransformation from corn oil phytosterols by P. aeruginosa was not previously reported. Results showed that the pH concentration of the medium, (NH4)2SO4 and KH2PO4 were the most significant factors affecting BOL production. By analyzing the statistical model of three-dimensional surface plot, BOL production increased from 36.8% to 42.4% after the first step of optimization, and the overall biotransformation increased to 51.9%. After applying the second step of the sequential statistical strategy BOL production increased to 53.6%, and the overall biotransformation increased to 91.9% using the following optimized medium composition (g/l distilled water) (NH4)2SO4, 2; KH2PO4, 4; Na2HPO4. 1; MgSO4·7H2O, 0.3; NaCl, 0.1; CaCl2·2H2O, 0.1; FeSO4·7H2O, 0.001; ammonium acetate 0.001; Tween 80, 0.05%; corn oil 0.5%; 8-hydroxyquinoline 0.016; pH 8; 200 rpm agitation speed and incubation time 36 h at 30 °C. Validation experiments proved the adequacy and accuracy of model, and the results showed the predicted value agreed well with the experimental values.
1. Introduction
In pharmaceutical industries, there are an urgent need for newer and cheaper raw materials containing natural sterols for the production of steroidal compounds. Several microbial bioconversion reactions of steroids and sterols have been reported, focusing mainly on steroid hydroxylation, 1-dehydrogenation and sterol side-chain cleavage. The side- chain cleavage of sterols molecules is one of the most widely reported biotransformation reactions of steroids, several species of the genera Arthrobacter, Bacillus, Mycobacterium, Corynebacterium, Mucor, Penicillium, Nocardia, Brevibacterium, Serrattia and Protoaminobacter, were reported for production of steroidal derivatives by side- chain cleavage of sterols.
They have a wide application as progestational agents, diuretics, anabolic and contraceptive agents, also as replacement agents in the treatment of adrenal insufficiencies, and recently steroidal glycoside exhibited anti-viral activity of herpes virus type I [1]. AD which is a naturally occurring steroidal hormone produced in the gonad or ovary, is an immediate precursor of testosterone in males and estradiol and estrone in females. Testosterone and dihydrotestosterone are the most potent male sex hormones [2]. Boldenone (BOL) is androgenic-anabolic steroid (AAS); which increases nitrogen retention, protein synthesis, appetite and stimulates the release of erythropoietin in the kidneys. Boldenone undecylenate is often prescribed for patients that have lost muscle mass due to extended periods of bed rest or bouts with significantly diminished muscle mass. In addition, Boldenone is a popular drug for administration in various animals and extensively used in the cattle and meat production industry.
From biochemical analysis and 16S rRNA sequencing, five different bacterial isolates capable of transforming corn oil phytosterols were isolated and identified as Pseudomonads aeruginosa (four strains) and one as Alcaligenes aquatilis. The application of response surface methodology RSM aims to rapid screening of experimental factors and ingredients interactions; it resulted in the determination of the optimal process parameters that significantly brings down the time and monetary value of experimentation [3]. Traditional optimization of fermentation factors (one at a time) is generally a time consuming and labor-intensive process. Moreover, RSM has an efficient mathematical approach based on the underlying rules of statistics such as randomization, replication and duplication, which simplifies the optimization by studying the mutual interactions among the variables over a range of values in a statistically valid manner widely applied in the optimization of fermentation [4].
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Chemicals
The authentic steroids used; β-sitosterol 99%, campesterol 98%, stigmasterol 99%, androst-4-ene 3,17-dione 98%, testosterone 99% and boldenone 99% were purchased from Sigma chemical company (USA). Tryptone, beef extract, bacterial peptone and nutrient broth were purchased from Difco (Germany). TLC Al pre-coated silica gel G UV (F254), disodium hydrogen phosphate, sodium sulphate (anhydrous), yeast extract and ammonium sulfate were from Merck 8-hydroxyquinoline from Riedel-deHaen. Tween 80 from VWR (Germany). Crude corn oil used in the current work was obtained from National Company for maize products, Egypt. All other chemicals and solvents used were of analytical grade and were held from various standard sources.
2.2. Isolation of microorganisms
Samples of soil were collected from factories producing corn oil. Enrichment culture technique [5] was applied, corn oil as a sole carbon and energy source was used to isolate bacterial strains. Soil samples were suspended in distilled water, shaked and cultured in selective isolation medium [6] containing (g/l): agar, 20; NH4NO3 17; K2HPO4, 0.25; MgSO4. H2O, 0.25; FeSO4. H2O, 0.001; NaCl, 0.005; Tween 80, 0.1%; corn oil 1%; fluconazole 150 mg as antifungal. The plates were incubated at 30 °C for 5 days at pH 7. Only microorganisms that can utilize corn oil as a sole carbon and energy source will grow and then isolated, purified and transferred to maintenance slants. Five bacterial strains were isolated and maintained on modified nutrient agar [7] at pH 6.8–7.2. The agar slopes were incubated for 24 h at 30 °C then stored at 4 °C with monthly subculture maintenance. The isolated strains were assigned the following abbreviations A, W, B1, B2 and B3 and were identified by biochemical activity and by 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequencing analysis.
2.3. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization
2.3.1. Phenotypic characterization
Gram staining and biochemical tests (oxidase, urease, catalase, DNAse, indole production and citrate utilization) were accomplished for identification of the five isolates as well as growth on different selective (mannitol salt agar and cetrimide agar) and moderately selective (macconkey agar) media (Table 1).
Table 1.
Biochemical properties of the isolates.
| Test | Isolate |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W | A | B1 | B2 | B3 | ||
| Gram stain | −ve rods | −ve rods | −ve rods | −ve rods | −ve rods | |
| Growth on mannitol salt agar | −ve | −ve | −ve | −ve | −ve | |
| Growth on macconkey agar | +ve | +ve | +ve | +ve | +ve | |
| Lactose fermentation on macconkey agar | −ve (yellow) | +ve (red) | −ve (yellow) | −ve (gry) | −ve (green) | |
| Growth on cetrimide agar | +ve (yellow) | −ve | +ve (yellow) | +ve (green) | +ve (green) | |
| Biofilm formation on congo red | +ve (black) | +ve (black) | +ve (black) | +ve (black) | +ve (black) | |
| DNA agar (DNAse test) | −ve | +ve | −ve | −ve | −ve | |
| Catalase test | + | + | + | + | + | |
| Oxidase test | + | + | + | + | + | |
| Urease | + | + | + | + | + | |
| Gelatinase | + | − | + | + | + | |
| Blood hemolysis | Α | γ | β | β | β | |
| MIO medium | Indol production | −ve | −ve | −ve | −ve | −ve |
| Motility | +ve | +ve | +ve | +ve | +ve | |
| Ornithine decarboxylase | +ve | −ve | +ve | +ve | +ve | |
2.3.2. 16rRNA gene sequencing and analysis
DNA extracted by Wizard® Genomic DNA purification kit supplied by Promega (Promega, Southampton, UK) according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. PCR amplification was done in 50 μl reaction volumes containing 2 μl of each primer, 8 μl of master mix, 2 μl of genomic DNA, 36 μl sterile distilled water. Amplification was done using the following profile; initial denaturation for 5 min at 95 °C, 30 cycles of denaturation for 30 s at 95 °C, annealing for 30 s at 52 °C, and extension for 1 min at 72 °C, and final extension for 10 min at 72 °C. Amplified products were detected by agarose gel electrophoresis in 1% Tris-Acetate-EDTA (TAE). Agarose gel stained with ethedium bromide and visualized on an ultraviolet illuminator. The following two primer pairs (sequence 5′-3′) were used for amplification of 16 S rRNA gene:
27F AGA GTT TGA TCM TGG CTC AG
1492R CGG TTA CCT TGT TAC GAC TT
DNA was sequenced using an automated sequencing system (BGI-Beijing, China). The amplified sequences were aligned to the sequences from the NCBI database. 16 S rRNA gene sequences were aligned with the 16 S sequences available in the NCBI database using the BLAST server (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). 16 S sequence of the highly matched strains was then aligned with our assembled whole contig (1537 bp) using CLUSTAL W (www.ebi.ac.uk/tools/msa/clustalw2/).
2.4. Determination of corn oil phytosterols profile by gas chromatography
Gas chromatography (Hewlett Packard, 6890) equipped with a flame ionization detector was used. Oven with initial temperature 180 °C and maximum 300 °C at initial time 0 min, equilibration time 3 min and run time 40 min and a capillary column (model number; HP 19091Z-413 HP1-methyl siloxane) with a maximum temperature 325 °C, nominal length: 30 m, nominal diameter: 320.00 μm, nominal film thickness 0.25 μm. The mode was constant flow 2 ml/min, inlet pressure 14.83 Pa; average velocity 41 cm/s and back inlet mode was splitless at initial temperature 275 °C. Detector temperature 295 °C as the hydrogen flow was 30 ml/min and air flow was 350 ml/min. Helium was the carrier gas at a flow rate of 30 ml/min [7].
2.5. Screening the ability of the five isolates for phytosterols biotransformation
Using growing cells a screening experiment was performed in two consecutive steps, namely, activation culture in activation medium and biotransformation culture in production medium. Firstly the bacteria were activated for phytosterols biotransformation by growing aerobically at 30 °C ± 2, 200 rpm for 24 h in 250 ml Erlenmeyer flasks, each containing 100 ml portion activation medium of the following composition (g/l distilled water): (NH4)2SO4, 2; KH2PO4, 4; Na2HPO4. 0.1; MgSO4·7H2O, 0.3; NaCl, 0.1; CaCl2·2H2O, 0.1; FeSO4·7H2O, 0.001; ammonium acetate 0.001; Tween 80, 0.1%; corn oil 1%; 8-hydroxyquinoline 0.016 and pH adjusted to 7. After activation step; 2 ml bacterial broth used for inoculation of three different production media [8], [9], [10]. The media were autoclaved at 121 °C (15 lb/inch2) for 15 min 2 ml culture was transferred to a 250 ml flask containing 50 ml of the production medium, the flasks were incubated at 30 °C ± 2, 200 rpm for 120 h. Isolate with highest yields was selected for further optimization experiments using the most suitable media.
2.6. Extraction of biotransformation products from fermentation broth
10 ml sample was taken at different time intervals (24, 36, 48, 72, 96 and 120 h), extracted three times with equal volume of ethyl acetate, dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate, and evaporated to dryness under vacuum (55 °C). Then ethyl acetate was added to re-dissolve the residue for analysis. This procedure usually gives an extraction efficiency of >95% [11].
2.7. Analysis of biotransformation products
2.7.1. Qualitative
Biotransformation products in the tested residues were identified via TLC technique. The method adopted can be summarized as follows: samples, dissolved in 100 μl ethyl acetate, were individually spotted (10 μl) by fine capillary on TLC pre-coated silica gel (20 × 20 cm) with fluorescence (Whatmann GF254). The developing solvent system used for TLC was petroleum ether: ethyl acetate (6:4 v/v). Chromatoplates were visualized by short (λ254nm) ultraviolet light, and then sprayed by color reagent, modified Liebermann-Burchard reagent [12] of the following composition; 1 ml sulfuric acid +20 ml acetic anhydride +50 ml chloroform. After spraying, TLC plates were heated at 110 °C for 10–15 min in oven to detect the color of each product according to its authentic color and Rf values. The resulting colored spots were viewed in daylight as well as under long (λ363nm) ultraviolet light.
2.7.2. Quantitative
The exact concentration for each product was determined spectrophotometerically using HPTLC (high performance thin layer chromatography). Samples, dissolved in 3 ml ethyl acetate were individually spotted (5 μl) by micro syringe on TLC plates, then the plates were developed in solvent system of petroleum ether: ethyl acetate (6:4) and ultraviolet light absorbance detected at short wave length (λ254nm). The area under the curve of different concentration of the authentic steroid for each product was determined and plotted against concentration and the slope of the straight line was calculated. The unknown concentration of each product was calculated from the following equation:
| Concentration = 1/slope × area under the curve × Dilution. |
The bioconversion activity percentages (yield of each product) were calculated as follows:
| BOL or T or AD% = amount of BOL or T or AD detected/amount of added phytosterol × 100 |
2.8. Biomass concentration
Twenty milliliters of the broth were extracted with equal amount of chloroform for oil and product removal. After phase separation, the water phase was filtered and twice washed with chloroform and distilled water. The residual cell mass was dried (110 °C) to constant weight.
2.9. Statistical designs
2.9.1. Plackett-Burman design
The Plackett-Burman experimental design is a fractional Factorial design [13]. This design is recommended when more than five factors are under investigation [14]. This design is practical, especially when the investigator is faced with a large number of factors and is unsure which settings are likely to produce optimal or near optimal responses [15]. In this study, the design was used to reflect the relative importance and concentrations of some medium components and fermentation conditions on BOL production. Seven independent variables were screened in nine combinations, organized according to the Plackett Burman design matrix described in the results section. For each variable, a high level (+) and low level (−) was tested. All trials were performed in duplicates and the averages of products percentage were treated as the responses. The main effect of each variable was determined by the following equation:
| Exi = (ΣMi+ − ΣMi−)/N |
Where Exi is the variable main effect, Mi+ and Mi− are BOL production in trials where the independent variable (xi) was present in high and in low settings, respectively, and N is the number of trials divided by 2.
2.9.2. Box-Behnken design
In the second phase of medium formulation for optimum BOL production, the Box-Behnken experimental design [16], was applied. In this model, the most significant independent variables, named (X1), (X2) and (X3) were included and each factor was examined at three different levels, low (−), high (+) and central or basal (0). These factors included initial pH of the medium (X1), concentration of (NH4)2SO4 (X2) and KH2PO4 (X3) were treated as independent variables. Thirteen combinations and their observations (shown in the results section) were fitted to the following second order polynomial mode:
Where, Y is the dependent variable (BOL production); X1, X2 and X3 are the independent variables; bo is the regression coefficient at center point; b1, b2 and b3 are linear coefficients; b12, b13 and b23 are second-order interaction coefficients; and b11, b22 and b33 are quadratic coefficients. The values of the coefficients were calculated and the optimum concentrations were predicted using JMP software. The quality of the fit of the polynomial model equation was expressed by R2 (regression coefficient).
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Identification of microorganisms
Preliminary identification of the isolated strains (Table1) indicated that four of the isolates are Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The fifth isolate was identified as Alcaligenes aquatilis. This identification is confirmed by API 20NE, VITEK 2 and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The phylogeny of isolate B3 is indicated in Fig 1.
Fig. 1.
Phylogenetic tree of isolate B3.
3.2. Estimation of crude corn oil total sterols
Corn oil total sterol was calculated as 760 mg/100 g oil. This agreed with records by codex standard for naming vegetable oils [17]. Verleyen et al. [18] estimated total sterol content at 779.6–924.3 mg/100 g in crude corn oil, and 685.5–773 mg/100 g in refined corn oil. In addition, crude corn oil total sterol estimated at 700–2210 mg/100 g by CODEX STAN 210-1999 [17]. This relatively high content of the phytosterols is a peculiar feature of corn oil, as compared to other common vegetable oils. Therefore, corn oil represents a cheap, rich raw material that potentially suitable candidate to perform the biotransformation process for the production of steroids using the enzymatic activity of some selected microbial isolates.
3.3. Determination of corn oil phytosterols profile by gas chromatography
GC analysis of corn oil clearly showed its phytosterols mixture profile to be consisted of cholesterol, 2.81%; stigmasterol, 9.03%; campesterol, 16.62% and β-sitosterol 52.8%. In addition, squalene was detected as 6.06% of the corn oil. Squalene is a key intermediate in the biosynthetic pathway of sterols. Majoni and Wang [19] estimated phytosterols of corn oil as stigmasterol, 5.0%; campesterol 7.1%; β-sitosterol 50.9%.
3.4. Screening experiments for biotransformation of corn oil phytosterols
The results of qualitative screening experiments showed that the isolate B1 and B3 have the best biotransformation ability for all the tested products using the three production media. Furthermore, upon quantitative comparison between isolate B1 and B3 for the production of the three products using the NM medium as the production medium, isolate B3 showed the highest transformation yields (Table 2). So, it was selected as the tested organism for further optimization.
Table 2.
Quantitative comparison between isolate B1 and B3 for biotransformation of corn oil phytosterols. Isolate 3
| Isolate B1 |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AD % | T % | BOL % | Total yield | Biomass g/10 ml | AD % | T % | BOL % | Biomass g/10 ml | |
| 24 h | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.07 | 0 | 0 | 16.7 | 0.03 |
| 36 h | 2.4 | 1.5 | 16.26 | 20.16 | 0.03 | 7.3 | 1.4 | 36.8 | 0.08 |
| 48 h | 4.7 | 3.8 | 13.7 | 22.2 | 0.1 | 10.1 | 1.6 | 34.9 | 0.07 |
| 60 h | 4.2 | 7.7 | 10.3 | 22.2 | 0.05 | 9.8 | 12.4 | 31.4 | 0.04 |
| 72 h | 3.6 | 5.4 | 6.4 | 15.4 | 0.09 | 5.3 | 10.8 | 26.2 | 0.05 |
| 96 h | 2.1 | 3.4 | 4.1 | 9.6 | 0.06 | 4.8 | 7.2 | 14.7 | 0.03 |
As boldenone (BOL) was accumulated as the major product of the biotransformation process, and the rare reports about optimization of its production from phytosterols, it was selected for further optimization. The production of BOL in single step microbial biotransformation from corn oil phytosterols by P. aeruginosa was not previously reported. However several authors reported the production of BOL by 1-dehydrogenation of testosterone using Fusarium lini [20] or by 17-carbonyl reduction of androst-1, 4-dien-3, 17-dione using Mucor racemosus [21]; Cephalosporium aphidicola [22]; Aspergillus brasiliensis [23]. The proposed biochemical pathway of phytosterol transformation by P. aeruginosa in this study involves side chain cleavage of phytosterol to produce AD, which was reduced to T. Both ADD and T were converted to BOL by 17 C O reduction or 1–2 dehydrogenation respectively.
3.5. Optimization of BOL production by multifactorial designs
The mineral medium [8] was chosen as the production medium for the optimal strategy that involved a two-phase experimental design. The first step was to evaluate the relative importance of various fermentation factors by applying a fractional design. In the second phase, levels of the variables, which have significant influences on BOL production, were investigated.
3.5.1. Placket-Burman design
The relative importance of various physiological factors involved in the process of corn oil biotransformation was explored using the Placket-Burman design [13] described in the material and methods section. Examined levels of 7 culture variables are presented in Table 3; the design was applied with 9 trials. All experiments were performed in duplicates and the averages of the observations were recorded. The main effects of each variable on AD, T and BOL production, were estimated and expressed graphically (Fig. 2). Data shown in Table 3 illustrated the wide variation in BOL production from 3.2% to 42.4%, thereby reflecting the importance of studying the medium composition for attaining higher productivity. The results showed clearly that BOL production is positively affected by the presence of high levels of (NH4)2SO4, KH2PO4 and pH adjustment. On the other hand, the incubation time and high concentrations of corn oil, Na2HPO4, and Tween 80 showed negative effects on BOL production.
Table 3.
Factors examined as independent variables affecting BOL production and their levels in the Plackett-Burman experiment and its results.
| Independent Variables |
Response |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trial no |
Corn oil % | (NH4)2SO4 | KH2PO4 | Na2HPO4 | Tween 80 % | Initial pH | Time (h) | BOL% | Final pH | Biomass g/10 ml |
| X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | ||||
| 1 | −(0.5) | −(1) | −(2) | +(3) | +(0.15) | +(9) | −(36) | 17.1 | 6.55 | 0.06 |
| 2 | +(1.5) | −(1) | −(2) | −(1) | −(0.05) | +(9) | +(60) | 5.2 | 5.9 | 0.06 |
| 3 | −(0.5) | +(3) | −(2) | −(1) | +(0.15) | −(5) | +(60) | 4 | 3.08 | 0.02 |
| 4 | +(1.5) | +(3) | −(2) | +(3) | −(0.05) | −(5) | −(36) | 6.2 | 3.55 | 0.09 |
| 5 | −(0.5) | −(1) | +(4) | +(3) | −(0.05) | −(5) | +(60) | 3.2 | 3.18 | 0.03 |
| 6 | +(1.5) | −(1) | +(4) | −(1) | +(0.15) | −(5) | −(36) | 3.6 | 3.69 | 0.11 |
| 7 | −(0.5) | +(3) | +(4) | −(1) | −(0.05) | +(9) | −(36) | 42.4 | 6.49 | 0.09 |
| 8 | +(1.5) | +(3) | +(4) | +(3) | +(0.15) | +(9) | +(60) | 23.5 | 6.08 | 0.17 |
| 9 | 0 (1) | 0 (2) | 0 (3) | 0 (2) | 0 (0.1) | 0 (7) | 0 (48) | 38.7 | 3.82 | 0.06 |
Fig. 2.
Main effects of independent variables on BOL production according to the results of the Plackett-Burman experiment.
During phytosterols transformation, the pH of the culture broth decreased, Rodina et al. [24] also reported the decrease in pH of the medium during conversion of soybean phytosterols to androstenedione by Mycobacterium neoaurum. The results also indicated that at higher substrate concentrations a remarkable decrease in BOL production, this may be due to substrate toxicity. These results agreed with that obtained by Zhang et al. [25] and Abd-Alla [26] as they reported decrease in bioconversion rates at higher levels of the substrate.
Tween 80 is often used in steroid transformation to increase the transport across the cell barrier by increasing bacterial cell permeability [27] and enhance the substrate solubilization in the media surrounding the cell, consequently the concentration gradient [2]. The high concentration of this surfactant showed adverse effect on cell growth and cause decrease in BOL production, as it may be incorporated into membrane lipids and affects microbial surface structure, composition, properties, and functions. Upon studying the effects of Tween 80 on the specific growth rate and biotransformation activities of Mycobacterium sp, Tween 80 at 3 g dm−3 reduced the specific growth rate by about 40% as compared with the control [28].
The incubation time is critical for steroid biotransformation. Maximum production of BOL in our study was achieved at 36 h (42.4%), on extending the fermentation process to 60 h, a remarkable reduction in BOL% was noticed, The same results were reported by others [7], [29]. The results of these experiments indicated that AD and ADD production depended strongly on biotransformation time and substrate concentration [30].
Based on the results obtained from the Placket-Burman experiment, a near optimized medium of the following composition (g/l): corn oil 0.5%; (NH4)2SO4, 3; KH2PO4, 4; Na2HPO4, 1; Tween 80, 0.05%; with an initial pH of 9 and an incubation period of 36 h is used for further optimization of BOL production. In order to determine the accuracy of this experiment, a verification using the experiment was carried out in a triplicate. The predicted near optimum levels of independent variables were examined against the basal condition settings, BOL yield increased from 36.8% to 42.4%.
3.5.2. Box-Behnken design
In order to approach the optimum response of BOL production, the effective independent variables, including the initial pH (X1), and the concentrations of (NH4)2SO4 (X2) and KH2PO4 (X3), were further investigated each at three levels according to the Box and Behnken design [16]. However, other variables with less significant effects that had a negative effect on BOL production were not included in Box-Behnken optimization experiment, but instead were used in all trials at their (−) level. According to these results, the experiments were designed to obtain a quadratic model consisting of 12 trials and 1 center point. Table 4 represents the design matrix of the coded variables together with the response of BOL production, final pH and growth.
Table 4.
Box–Behnken factorial design for three independent variables.
| Independent Variables |
Response |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trial | pH | (NH4)2SO4 | KH2PO4 | BOL % | Final pH | Dry Weight g/10 ml |
| X1 | X2 | X3 | ||||
| 1 | 8 (−) | 2 (−) | 4 (0) | 53.6 | 5.93 | 0.041 |
| 2 | 10 (+) | 2 (−) | 4 (0) | 1.8 | 7.61 | 0.096 |
| 3 | 8 (−) | 4 (+) | 4 (0) | 30 | 6.14 | 0.063 |
| 4 | 10 (+) | 4 (+) | 4 (0) | 2.6 | 9.85 | 0.08 |
| 5 | 8 (−) | 3 (0) | 3 (−) | 26.3 | 5.69 | 0.091 |
| 6 | 10 (+) | 3 (0) | 3 (−) | 5.3 | 9.66 | 0.059 |
| 7 | 8 (−) | 3 (0) | 5 (+) | 20.2 | 6.28 | 0.093 |
| 8 | 10 (+) | 3 (0) | 5 (+) | 0 | 9.7 | 0.059 |
| 9 | 9 (0) | 2 (−) | 3 (−) | 22.4 | 5.85 | 0.111 |
| 10 | 9 (0) | 4 (+) | 3 (−) | 43.1 | 5.95 | 0.101 |
| 11 | 9 (0) | 2 (−) | 5 (+) | 26.9 | 6.41 | 0.11 |
| 12 | 9 (0) | 4 (+) | 5 (+) | 26.3 | 6.44 | 0.129 |
| 13 | 9 (0) | 3 (0) | 4 (0) | 51 | 6.16 | 0.105 |
As shown in Table 4 the highest BOL yield 53.6% obtained at pH 8 that was the optimum pH. The results also indicated that upon increasing the medium pH to 10 a sharp decrease in BOL production occurred. Optimum pH 8 was also reported by Goswami et al. [31] for production of AD (D) from 17-ketosteroids by Arthrobacter. In addition, optimal pH between 6 and 8 for steroid biotransformation had referred by several reports as Sallam et al. [7] and Zhang et al. [25]; they reported optimal pH at 7. Abd-Elsalam et al. [30] reported optimum pH 6.5 for production of androstenedione (AD) and androstadienedione (ADD) from sunflower oil sterols by Fusarium solani. Adequacy and fitness of the model were evaluated by ANOVA analysis (Table 5). The regression equation coefficients were calculated, and the data were fitted to a second-order polynomial equation. The regression equation obtained was as follows:
Where YBOL is the predicted response of BOL yield and X1, X2 and X3 are the coded independent variables for initial pH, the concentrations of (NH4)2SO4 and KH2PO4 respectively. The F value and P values were used to check the significance of each coefficient, which also indicated the interaction strength between independent variables. The larger the magnitude of the F value and smaller the P value, the more significant is the corresponding coefficient [32]. ANOVA analysis showed a significant F value (22.0627) for the effect of pH on BOL production, which implied the model to be significant. The model has a value of Probability P (0.0054) less than 0.05 that considered highly significant. The determination of coefficient (R2) was calculated as 0.921023 for BOL production (a value of R2 > 0.75 indicated the aptness of the model) which indicates the statistical model can explain 92.1% of variability in the response. The goodness of the model can be checked by the determination of coefficient (R2) and correlation coefficient (R). The closer the value of R to 1, the better the correlation between the measured and the predicted values. It can be seen from Table 5 that the linear term regression coefficients of X1 are highly significant at the 5% level, these results indicated that the initial pH of the medium is correlated in direct relationship with the production of BOL. An overall 45.6% increase in BOL yield has being achieved after application of RSM. This reflects the necessity and value of the optimization process. The effect of X2 and X3 as well as their interaction effects were not significant (P > 0.05).
Table 5.
Results of ANOVA analysis for optimization of BOL production by the Box–Behnken experiment.
| Term | Coefficient estimate | df | SE | Sum of squares | t-value | F-value | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corrected Model | 9 | 4788.9808 | 6.4788 | 0.0267 | |||
| Intercept | 51 | 1 | 5.232288 | 9.75 | 0.0002 | ||
| X1 pH | −15.05 | 1 | 3.204109 | 1812.0200 | −4.7 | 22.0627 | 0.0054a |
| X2 (NH4)2SO4 | −0.3375 | 1 | 3.204109 | 0.9113 | −0.11 | 0.0111 | 0.9202 |
| X3KH2PO4 | −2.9625 | 1 | 3.204109 | 70.2113 | −0.92 | 0.8549 | 0.3976 |
| X1a X2pH*(NH4)2SO4 | 6.1 | 1 | 4.531294 | 148.8400 | 1.35 | 1.8122 | 0.2360 |
| X1a X3pHa KH2PO4 | 0.2 | 1 | 4.531294 | 0.1600 | 0.04 | 0.0019 | 0.9665 |
| X2a X3 (NH4)2SO4a KH2PO4 | −5.325 | 1 | 4.531294 | 113.4225 | −1.18 | 1.3810 | 0.2928 |
| X12 pHa pH | −22.8625 | 1 | 4.71632 | 1700.0298 | −4.85 | 20.6991 | 0.0047a |
| X22 (NH4)2SO4a (NH4)2SO4 | −6.1375 | 1 | 4.71632 | 91.7178 | −1.30 | 1.1167 | 0.2499 |
| X32 KH2PO4a KH2PO4 | −15.188 | 1 | 4.71632 | 851.6683 | −3.22 | 10.3697 | 0.0635 |
R2 = R Squared = 0.921023 (Adjusted R Squared = 0.778864).
Significant at 5% level.
Three dimensional response surface plots (Fig. 3) and Pareto Plot (Fig. 4) were employed to determine the interactions of the three factors and showed the optimum levels of each and their interactions. The optimal levels of the three factors were estimated using SAS JMP 8 NULL program tools and found to be as follows: pH 8; (NH4)2SO4; 2 g/l and KH2PO4; 4 g/l. Our result showed graphically, the relationship and the interaction between the independent variables (initial pH, the concentrations of (NH4)2SO4 and KH2PO4) and response (BOL production). These factors are the most important factors and needs fine regulation for enhancing BOL production.
Fig. 3.
Three-dimensional surface plots showing the relationships between significant tested factors on BOL yield.
Fig. 4.
Pareto Plot of Transformed Estimates.
4. Conclusions
Conclusions In this study, A new potent Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolate capable of biotransformation of corn oil phytosterol (PS) to 4-androstene-3, 17-dione (AD), testosterone (T) and boldenone (BOL) was identified by phenotypic analysis and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The response surface methodology was a potent and efficient method to optimize the parameters affecting the PS biotransformation process. To our knowledge, the microbial production of (BOL) from corn oil phytosterols in single step biotransformation process by P.aeruginosa was not previously reported. By analyzing the statistical model of three-dimensional surface plot, BOL production increased from 36.8% to 42.4% after the first step of optimization, and the overall biotransformation increased to 51.9%. After applying the second step of the sequential statistical strategy BOL production increased to 53.6%, and the overall biotransformation increased to 91.9% using the statistically optimized medium.
References
- 1.Bhatti H.N., Khera R.A. Biological transformations of steroidal compounds: a review. Steroids. 2012;77(12):1267–1290. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2012.07.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Malaviya A., Gomes J. Androstenedione production by biotransformation of phytosterols. Bioresour. Technol. 2008;99(15):6725–6737. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.01.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ghosh D., Hallenbeck P.C. Response surface methodology for process parameter optimization of hydrogen yield by the metabolically engineered strain Escherichia coli DJT135. Bioresour. Technol. 2010;101(6):1820–1825. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.10.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Arrivukkarasan S., et al. Effect of medium composition and kinetic studies on extracellular and intracellular production of L-asparaginase from Pectobacterium carotovorum. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2010;16(2):115–125. doi: 10.1177/1082013209353219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mahato S.B., Banerjee S., Podder S. Novel microbial transformation of 16-dehydro pregnenolone by Arthrobacter simplex. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987;28(44):5315–5318. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Arima K., et al. Microbial transformation of sterols: Part I. Decomposition of cholesterol by microorganisms Part II. cleavage of sterol side chains by microorganisms. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1969;33(11):1636–1650. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sallam L., et al. Microbial transformation of phytosterols mixture from rice bran oil unsaponifiable matter by selected bacteria. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008;24(9):1643–1656. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Goswami P., et al. Mode of uptake of insoluble solid substrates by microorganisms. I: sterol uptake by an Arthrobacter species. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1983;25(12):2929–2943. doi: 10.1002/bit.260251210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sripalakit P., Wichai U., Saraphanchotiwitthaya A. Biotransformation of various natural sterols to androstenones by Mycobacterium sp: and some steroid-converting microbial strains. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2006;41(1):49–54. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yazdi M., et al. Cholesterol-degrading bacteria: isolation, characterization and bioconversion. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2000;16(1):103–105. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Saunders R., Cheetham P., Hardman R. Microbial transformation of crude fenugreek steroids. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1986;8(9):549–555. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lisboa B.P. [1] Thin-layer chromatography of steroids, sterols, and related compounds. Meth. Enzymol. 1969;15:3–158. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Plackett R.L., Burman J.P. The design of optimum multifactorial experiments. Biometrika. 1946;33(4):305–325. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yu X., et al. Application of the Plackett-Burman experimental design to evaluate nutritional requirements for the production of Colletotrichum coccodes spores. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1997;47(3):301–305. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Strobel R., Sullivan G. In: Demain A.L., Davies J.E., editors. vol. 2. ASM Press; Washington, DC, USA: 1999. Experimental design for improvement of fermentations; pp. 80–93. (Manual of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology). [Google Scholar]
- 16.Box G.E., Behnken D.W. Some new three level designs for the study of quantitative variables. Technometrics. 1960;2(4):455–475. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Alimentarius C. Codex standard for named vegetable oils. Codex Stan. 1999;210:1–13. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Verleyen T., et al. Analysis of free and esterified sterols in vegetable oils. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2002;79(2):117–122. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Majoni S., Wang T. Characterization of oil precipitate and oil extracted from condensed corn distillers solubles. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2010;87(2):205–213. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Al-Aboudi A., et al. Microbial transformation of testosterone by Rhizopus stolonifer and Fusarium lini. Nat. Prod. Res. 2008;22(17):1498–1509. doi: 10.1080/14786410802234528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Faramarzi M.A., et al. Microbial conversion of androst-1: 4-dien-3, 17-dione by Mucor racemosus to hydroxysteroid-1, 4-dien-3-one derivatives. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2009;84(7):1021–1025. [Google Scholar]
- 22.ChoudHary M.I., et al. Microbial transformation of (+)-androsta-1: 4-diene-3, 17-dione by Cephalosporium aphidicola. Nat. Prod. Lett. 2002;16(6):377–382. doi: 10.1080/10575630290033132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hosseinabadi T., et al. Fungal transformation of androsta-1, 4-diene-3, 17-dione by Aspergillus brasiliensis. Daru. 2014:1. doi: 10.1186/s40199-014-0071-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rodina N., et al. Conversion of phytosterols into androstenedione by Mycobacterium neoaurum. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2008;44(1):48–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhang X.-y., et al. Optimization of biotransformation from phytosterol to androstenedione by a mutant Mycobacterium neoaurum ZJUVN-08. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B. 2013;14(2):132–143. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1200067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Abd-Alla A. Microbial conversion of sugar cane phytosterols by Fusarium solani. Int. J. Anal. Pharm. Biomed. Sci. 2013;2(4):14–21. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Brown M., Winsley B. Effect of polysorbate 80 on cell leakage and viability of Pseudomonas aeruginosa exposed to rapid changes of pH, temperature and tonicity. Microbiology. 1969;56(1):99–107. doi: 10.1099/00221287-56-1-99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wang Z.F., et al. Lecithin-enhanced biotransformation of cholesterol to androsta-1: 4-diene-3, 17-dione and androsta-4-ene-3, 17-dione. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2002;77(12):1349–1357. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lin Y., et al. Microbial transformation of phytosterol in corn flour and soybean flour to 4-androstene-3: 17-dione by Fusarium moniliforme Sheld. Bioresour. Technol. 2009;100(5):1864–1867. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.09.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Abd-Elsalam I., El-Refai H., Abouel-Fotouh A. Factorial design for the production of some steroidal hormones from sunflower oil sterols by Fusarium solani. J. Appl. Sci. 2007;3(10):921–925. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Goswami P., Singh H., Baruah J. Factors limiting the microbial conversion of sterols to 17-ketosteroids in the presence of metal chelate inhibitors. Folia Microbiol. 1984;29(3):209–216. doi: 10.1007/BF02877310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zhou B., et al. Statistical optimization of cultivation conditions for exopolysacchride production and mycelia growth by Stropharia rugosoannulata. Ann. Microbiol. 2010;60(1):89–96. [Google Scholar]




