KIF21A mutation in two Chinese families with congenital fibrosis of the extraocular muscles type 1 and 3

Abstract

Congenital fibrosis of the extraocular muscles (CFEOM) is a hereditary ocular disease and can be classified into three subtypes. The aim of the present study was to determine the genetic basis and describe the clinical phenotype of CFEOM type 1 and 3. Two Chinese families with CFEOM type 1 and 3 were identified. The patients and their family members were subjected to comprehensive ophthalmic examinations, including best-corrected visual acuity, slit-lamp examination, fundus examination, assessment of palpebral fissure size, levator function, ocular motility, and cover and forced duction tests. Genomic DNA was extracted from the leukocytes of venous blood samples collected from the two families and from 200 unrelated control subjects from the same population. Coding exons of the KIF21A gene were amplified using polymerase chain reaction analysis and sequenced directly in the two probands. The detected mutations were further analyzed in all available family members and the unrelated control subjects. A heterozygous mutation, c.2860C>T (p.R954W), in KIF21A was identified in the two families, and this was cosegregated with the presence of the diseases in the two families, however, it was absent in the 200 normal control subjects. Among the three affected family members with CFEOM1, differences were observed with regard to the presence of aberrant eye movement. The results indicated that, in the patients with CFEOM1 and CFEOM3, the disease was caused by the same KIF21A gene mutation. The KIF21A gene may be a major disease-causing gene for Chinese patients with CFEOM3. Phenotypic heterogeneity was observed in the patients with CFEOM1.

Introduction

Congenital fibrosis of the extraocular muscles (CFEOM) is a hereditary ocular motility disorder characterized by non-progressive restrictive ophthalmoplegia and ptosis (1). CFEOM can be classified into three types, based on their phenotypes and inheritance patterns: CFEOM type 1 (CFEOM1; OMIM 135700), type 2 (CFEOM2; OMIM602078) and type 3 (CFEOM3; OMIM 600638, 607034). Of these, CFEOM1 and CFEOM3 can be inherited in an autosomal dominant manner, whereas CFEOM2 is inheritable in an autosomal recessive manner. Three disease-causing genes, Homo sapiens kinesin family member 21A (KIF21A), paired-like homeobox 2a (ARIX or PHOX2A) and tubulin β3 (TUBB3) have been identified to be associated with CFEOM (2–4).

Known as 'classic CFEOM', CFEOM1 is the most common form of CFEOM. It is a distinct, non-syndromic, congenital cranial dysinnervation disorder, and is characterized by congenital non-progressive bilateral external ophthalmoplegia, manifesting as restricted vertical and horizontal ocular motility and ptosis, leading to droopy eyelids and a chin-up position of the head (5). Heterozygous missense mutations in KIF21A have been identified to cause the classic CFEOM1 phenotype, and sporadic cases result from de novo mutations in KIF21A. In the 38-exon gene, only three exons have been reported to harbor mutations: Exon 21 (2860C>T, 2861G>A, 2861G>T), exon 8 (1067T>C) and exon 20 (2830G>C, 2839A>G, 2840T>C, 2840T>G) (6,7).

CFEOM3 represents a form of CFEOM, which does not meet the classic criteria for CFEOM1 or CFEOM2. It is less common than CFEOM1 and, compared with CFEOM1, individuals with CFEOM3 demonstrate variable expressivity of CFEOM, and at least one affected individual lacks or has only unilateral ophthalmoplegia or ptosis, or has one or both eyes fixed above the midline, or has the ability to raise one or both eyes above the midline (8,9). CFEOM3 is often autosomal dominant with variable penetrance. The majority of families with CFEOM3 have been mapped to 16qter (10–12) and result from a heterozygous mutation in TUBB3 (3). However in 9% of families, CFEOM3 is reported to map to the CFEOM1 locus and harbor KIF21A mutations (9).

The present study identified two Chinese families, one with CFEOM1 and one with CFEOM3. The genetic basis was examined, and the clinical phenotypes of CFEOM1 and CFEOM3 were described.

Materials and methods

Family recruitment and clinical evaluation

Two families with CFEOM were identified. Following the provision of informed consent from all participating individuals or their parents, each participating individual was subjected to comprehensive ophthalmic examinations. Venous blood samples were collected from eight members of the two families and from 200 unrelated control subjects from the same population. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood leucocytes using standard protocols. The present study was performed, according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University (Guangzhou, China).

The two families were referred to Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, China in April 2015 for severely restrictive strabismus and ptosis, present in the probands. All eight family members, comprising IV:2, IV:3, IV:4, V:2 and V:3 in family 1, and I:1, I:2 and II:1 in family 2 (Fig. 1), which included the four affected individuals and their asymptomatic parents or siblings, were subjected to comprehensive ophthalmic examinations (Table I), including routine ophthalmic examination and strabismus assessments. The primary position of gaze, ductions and versions with a cover test were analyzed and quantified in six diagnostic positions. The affected individuals underwent forced duction assessment under topical anesthesia. Globe retraction or aberrant movements were observed. The width of the palpebral fissure was measured. Levator function was measured from the upper lid margin during attempted supraduction from the infraducted position without recruitment of the frontalis muscle. Ptosis was defined by a ≥2 mm covering of the iris by the upper lid, and was graded as mild if the upper lid covered the iris above the upper pupillary margin, moderate if the lid occluded half the pupil and severe if the lid occluded more than half the pupil (13). Visual acuity and cycloplegic refraction were also determined.

Figure 1.

Pedigrees of the two families identified with congenital fibrosis of the extraocular muscles. Squares represent males, circles represent females, arrows indicate probands, and black symbols identify clinically affected individuals.

Table I.

Clinical presentations of the four affected members.

Parameter	Family 1: IV:3	Family 1: V:2	Family 1: V:3	Family 2: II:1
Age (years)	34	6	3	4
Gender	Male	Female	Male	Female
Birth history	Full-term	Full-term	Full-term	Full-term
BCVA (decimals)
OD	0.4	0.2	Unable	0.1
OS	0.3	0.2	Unable	0.2
Refractive error
OD	+0.50/+2.00	+2.00/+5.00	+2.00/+1.00	−0.25/+1.00
OS	+1.00/+2.50	+1.50/+2.50	+2.00/+1.50	+1.25/+1.75
Stereopsis (butterfly)	Nila	Nil	Nil	Nil
Strabimus	Hypo with Eso	Hypo with Eso	Hypo	Hypo with Eso
Eye movement
OD	Restrictive UAHM	Fixed	Restrictive UAHM	Restrictive UAHM and HM
OS	Restrictive UAHM and HM	Fixed	Restrictive UAHM	Variable restrictive upgaze and HM
Ptosis
OD	Moderate	Severe	Severe	No
OS	Severe	Severe	Severe	Severe
Bell's phenomenon	Absent	Absent	Absent	Absent
Forced duction test
OD	Positive	Unable	Unable	Unable
OS	Positive	Unable	Unable	Unable
Nystagmus	On upgaze	In all directions of gaze	Absent	Absent
Synergistic convergence	On upgaze	In all directions of gaze	Absent	Absent
Pupil size	Normal	Normal	Normal	Normal
Pupillary light reflex	Normal	Normal	Normal	Normal
Compensatory head position	Chin up	Chin up and mouth open	Chin up	Chin up
Proptosis ocular	No	No	No	No
Upper eyelid lag	No	No	No	No
Other ophthalmic examinations	Unremarkable	Unremarkable	Unremarkable	Unremarkable

^aThe result of 'nil' in the stereopsis test indicates that the patient cannot identify any figures present on the test, and the patient has no stereopsis. BCVA, best corrected visual acuity; OD, oculus dexter (the right eye); OS, oculus sinister (the left eye); Hypo, hypotropia; Eso, esotropia; UAHM, upgaze above horizontal midline; HM, horizontal motility.

Mutation screening and sequence analysis

A 5 ml venous blood sample was collected from each participant for genomic DNA extraction. DNA extraction from peripheral blood leukocytes was performed using a DNA extraction kit (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA, USA) with standard protocols. Ethylene diaminetetraacetic acid-treated tubes were used for blood collection. Exons and flanking exon-intron boundaries of the KIF21A gene (38 exons) were amplified using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis with the primers (14) (Beijing Genomics Institute, Guangzhou, China). Briefly, PCR was performed in a 50 μl reaction volume with 2 μl each primer, 2 μl DNA, 25 μl buffer mix and 19 μl H₂O. All reagents used for PCR were purchased from Takara Bio, Inc. (Tokyo, Japan). The cycling profile was as follows: One cycle at 94°C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles at 94°C for 45 sec, 59°C for 45 sec and 72°C for 45 sec, with a final cycle at 72°C for 10 min (14). The PCR products were sequenced from both directions using an ABI3730 automated sequencer (PE Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The sequencing results were analyzed using Seqman (version 2.3; Technelysium Pty, Ltd., Brisbane, QLD, Australia). Variations were identified by aligning sequences to the reference sequences from the National Center for Biotechnology Information database (NCBI; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). Detected variations were further analyzed by cosegregation analysis in the eight available family members and the normal control subjects.

Results

Clinical findings

Family and personal histories were carefully reviewed. The two families were from the Guangdong province of China. The diagnosis of CFEOM1 was based on inheritance patterns and clinical phenotypes, and this family was designated as family 1. In family 1, there were six affected family members with CFEOM in five generations (Fig. 1). The three affected members available for investigation (IV:3, V:2, V:3) shared the typical clinical features of CFEOM1, which have been reported previously (5). These features included bilateral congenital non-progressive ptosis, severely impaired vertical motility with an inability to raise either eye above the horizontal midline and variable impaired horizontal motility, infraducted position in primary gaze, a chin-up position of the head and an absence of Bell's phenomenon. Synergistic convergence on attempted upgaze was also observed in IV:3 and V:2. Of the three patients, one exhibited nystagmoid movements in all directions of gaze, one exhibited nystagmoid movements only in upgaze and the third exhibited no nystagmoid movements. The forced duction test demonstrated marked restrictions in passive elevation of the globes in IV:3. Family members V:2 and V:3 were unable to participate in the forced duction test. IV:3 and V:2 had poor visual acuity, and V:3 was unable to be assessed for visual acuity. No notable findings were detected in the examinations of the anterior segments or fundus.

In family 2, there were no other affected family members in the four generations. The proband presented with the typical clinical features of CFEOM3. Specifically, the proband had unilateral, congenital, non-progressive ptosis, variable restricted upgaze and horizontal eye movements, and was able to elevate left eye above the midline. The chin-elevated position of the head and the absence of Bell's phenomenon were similar to the observations with CFEOM1. The clinical presentations of the four affected members are listed in Table I. Examples of the compensatory head position and primary images of the unaltered eyelid and nine-gaze positions of the probands are shown in Figs. 2 and 3. The range of extraocular movements and the position of the eyes in the primary position of the four affected members are shown in Fig. 4.

Figure 2.

Images of the proband from family 1. Images were captured of the (A) compensatory head position, in (B) primary gaze with unaltered eyelids and in (C–K) nine-gaze positions with lifted eyelids (in sequence C–K, looking up and right, straight up, up and left, straight right, straight, straight left, down and left, straight down, down and left). This individual exhibited typical CFEOM1 features, including bilateral ptosis, infraducted globe position in primary gaze, severely restricted upgaze with an inability to raise the eyes above horizontal midline, variable impaired horizontal motility and chin-up position of the head.

Figure 3.

Images of the proband from family 2. Images were captured of the (A) compensatory head position, in (B) primary gaze with unaltered eyelids and in (C–K) nine-gaze positions with lifted eyelids (in sequence C–K, looking up and right, straight up, up and left, straight right, straight, straight left, down and left, straight down, down and left). This individual exhibited typical CFEOM3 features, including unilateral ptosis, variable restricted upgaze and horizontal eye movements, with an ability to elevate the left eye above the midline, and chin-up position of the head.

Figure 4.

Range of extraocular movement and position of the eyes in the primary position of the patients in the two families. Extraocular movement was rated on a scale of 0–4, with 0 indicating no movement in that direction and 4 indicating normal movement in that direction. The grey dot indicates the position of the pupil within the orbit in primary gaze. SR, superior rectus; IR, inferior rectus; LR, lateral rectus; MR, medial rectus; SO, superior oblique; IO, inferior oblique; OD, oculus dexter (the right eye); OS, oculus sinister (the left eye).

Mutation screening

Genetic analysis documented the presence of a heterozygous mutation, c.2860C>T, in the KIF21A gene within all four patients of the two families. This mutation was not observed in the unaffected family members or in the 200 unrelated control subjects from the same population (Fig. 5).

Figure 5.

Sequencing chromatograms showing KIF21A mutations in the four affected members of family 1 and family 2 (2860C>T). The position of the mutation is marked by an arrow and the corresponding wild-type sequence is shown as a control.

Discussion

In the present study, a known mutation (c.2860C>T) in KIF21A was identified in two Chinese families with CFEOM1 and CFEOM3. The clinical findings revealed the phenotypic heterogeneity present within the three members of family 1 affected with CFEOM1.

The diagnosis of CFEOM1 in family 1 was based upon an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern, and was characterized by bilateral congenital ptosis, bilateral infraducted globe position in the primary gaze and a severely restricted upgaze with variable horizontal eye movements. In CEEOM1, all affected members of a family exhibit classic presentations of CFEOM and show dominant inheritance. By contrast, in families with CFEOM3, one or more affected individuals fail to exhibit the classic characteristics of this disorder. For example, the individual's eyes may not be infraducted or may elevate above the midline, the individual may be unilaterally affected, or ptosis may be absent. In the proband of family 2, unilateral ptosis and variable restrictive upgaze indicated a diagnosis of CFEOM3, rather than CFEOM1. Among the three affected members in family 1, IV:3 and V:2 exhibited nystagmus and synergistic convergence, whereas no such aberrant eye movements were recorded in V:3. It appears likely that aberrant innervation may be responsible for the severity of restricted eye movements. Among the three affected members in family 1, both IV:3 and V:2 exhibited nystagmus as well as synergistic convergence, whereas no such aberrant eye movements were present in V:3.

CFEOM1 is inherited as a fully penetrant, autosomal dominant trait and maps to the CFEOM1 locus on chromosome 12cen (15–18). The disease-causing gene, KIF21A, belongs to a family of kinesin motor proteins, which are responsible for the transport of membranous organelles, protein complexes and mRNAs to specific destinations within the cell, in a microtubule and ATP-dependent manner. These functions are essential for the normal morphogenesis and functioning of the cell (19). Results from previous studies have indicated that the KIF21A gene product may have a generalized effect in the development of all the ocular motor nuclei of cranial nerves III, IV and VI (6,7).

To date, 12 missense mutations and one deletion have been identified in the KIF21A gene in patients presenting with CFEOM1 (4,5,7,20,21). Among these, the c.2860C>T mutation has been identified as the most common mutation, with a prevalence of between 72 and 75% (4,22). The c.2860C>T mutation is located in a methylated CpG (mCpG) dinucleotide of the gene (23) and these mCpG sequences represent mutational hotspots in human genetic diseases. Random deamination of 5-methylcytosines produces these mutations (24). Considerable evidence exists indicating that the CFEOM1 phenotype results from mutations in KIF21A and that sporadic cases are due to de novo mutations in the same gene (7,19). The occurrence of this mutation in the families in the present study suggests a mutation hot spot.

The proband in family 2 also harbored the most commonly observed KIF21A mutation, c.2860C>T. KIF21A mutations are reported to be a rare cause of CFEOM3 (9). However, the KIF21A mutation has been reported in a Taiwanese pedigree (25) and in families from other regions of China with CFEOM3 (5). To date, five Chinese families with CFEOM3 have been reported with identified mutations (5,25–27), with four sharing the same KIF21A mutation and the fifth harboring the TUBB3 gene mutation. This suggests that the KIF21A mutation may be a hot spot mutation of CFEOM3 in Chinese individuals.

In the present study, a heterozygous KIF21A c.2860C>T mutation was found to be present in a family with CFEOM1 and a family with CFEOM3. Identical gene mutations causing distinct phenotypes were observed in CFEOM. Taken together, it is reasonable to conclude that the KIF21A mutation may be a major disease-causing gene for CFEOM3 in Chinese individuals.

Abbreviations

CFEOM

congenital fibrosis of the extraocular muscles

PCR

polymerase chain reaction