Abstract
The purpose of the present study is to investigate the effect of mesenchymal stem cells in corneal neovascularization and wound healing, and to compare the effectiveness of two possible application routes, subconjunctival injection and amniotic membrane transplantation. Chemical injury was induced by application of sodium hydroxide to the rats' corneas. After 7 days, the animals were divided into three groups. Different treatment methods were used for each group as follows: i) Group 1, injection of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) under the conjunctiva; ii) group 2, transplantation of amniotic membranes, previously seeded with BMSCs; and iii) group 3, the untreated control group. The eyes were examined using a slit lamp on a weekly basis. After 4 weeks, the animals were sacrificed and corneas were removed for further examination. Corneal flat mounts were made following ink perfusion for improved vessel visualization, image capturing and quantitative evaluation. enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was performed to detect the levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9). Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction was used for detection of VEGF-A, MMP-9, Toll-like receptor (TLR)2 and TLR4 gene expression levels. Cryosections were used for histological examination and immunostaining. Statistical analysis (Welch's one-way analysis of variance) demonstrated a significant difference between the groups [P≤0.05, confidence interval (CI) 95%]. The level of injury in group 1 was significantly different from groups 2 and 3. Measurement of the vessel area and VEGF gene expression levels had a similar difference among the groups (P≤0.05, CI 95%), however the differences for TLR2 and TLR4 were not statistically significant. BMSCs were previously transduced with the green fluorescent protein gene by lentivirus to track the movement of the cells following transplantation. The transplanted cells enhanced corneal wound healing by trophic factor production and immune-regulatory effect, rather than by direct transdifferentiation into corneal cells. The results of the current study demonstrated that BMSCs enhance corneal wound healing and decrease the area of neovascularization. Furthermore, the comparison of two application routes indicated that single subconjunctival injection appeared more effective than transplantation with amniotic membrane.
Keywords: corneal neovascularization, chemical injury, mesenchymal stem cell, amniotic membrane, transplantation
Introduction
Approximately ten million people worldwide are bilaterally blind due to corneal involvement (1,2). It is the second most common cause of reversible blindness, following cataracts. The majority of cases are connected with corneal neovascularization (CNV). Various factors can induce CNV, including aniridia, degeneration, inflammation, infection, extended contact lens wear (3,4) and chemical or mechanical injuries (5,6).
Chemical injury of the cornea is an ophthalmic emergency and a common cause of corneal neovascularization and blindness in the developing world. Treatment of the chemical injuries include medical (7) and surgical approaches (8–10). Numerous cases require surgical intervention, particularly limbal stem cell transplantation. This is possible in unilateral disease, when the contralateral cornea is healthy or less damaged. However, there is a risk of limbal stem cell deficiency development in the donor eye. Allogeneic limbal transplantation has been conducted by a number of ophthalmologists, however, results were not satisfactory and treatment requires prolonged immunosuppressive therapy. Other sources of cells, including conjunctival cells (11), buccal mucosal cells, embryonic stem cells (12), induced pluripotent stem cells and mesenchymal stem cells (13–16) have been investigated for reconstruction of the limbal stem cell niche.
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are a safe therapeutic option and may be used for autologous transplantations. These stem cells were first isolated from bone marrow, but later they were identified in different tissues and organs, including adipose tissue, dental pulp, amniotic fluid and the umbilical cord. Previous studies have demonstrated MSCs have plasticity and can differentiate into various cell types (17,18). Furthermore, these cells can regulate immune response by regulation of T cell (19), B cell and NK cell activity (20), and can be safely used for allogeneic transplantation.
MSCs have been used in numerous studies for reconstitution of the corneal surface (10,14–16,21–30). Certain previous studies have demonstrated transdifferentiation ability into corneal cell lines (15,31–34). Often amniotic membranes were used for stem cell expansion and further transplantation into the cornea (16,23,25,26,30,35). However, certain previous studies used supernatants or systemic administration of stem cells. All these techniques are complicated, time-consuming and not accessible in developing countries. Simple subconjunctival injection of stem cells has been proposed by Yao et al (28), which was effective in corneal wound healing.
The aim of the present study was to further investigate the role of MSCs in corneal neovascularization and wound healing, and also to compare the effectiveness of two administration routes, subconjunctival injection and transplantation of amniotic membrane.
Materials and methods
Animals
Female Wistar rats (n=48; age, 6 weeks; weight, 150–180 g) were purchased from the Animal Center of Jilin University (Changchun, China). All animal procedures were handled according to the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Statements for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research and were approved by Jilin University Animal Care and Use Committee.
The animals were housed 2 per cage at a temperature of 24–26°C, humidity 55–60% and a 12 h light/dark cycle, with ad libitum access to food and water. The rats were anesthetized by injection of 10% chloral hydrate (4 ml/kg). At the end of the study (week 5), animals were sacrificed using an overdose of the anesthetic (10 ml/kg).
Isolation, culture and characterization of BMSCs
BMSCs were isolated and cultured according to the previously described protocols (36). Briefly, the marrow cavity was flushed with 1 ml Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM)/F12 (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). The medium with the bone marrow was transferred into 2 ml Eppendorf tubes and centrifuged at 350 × g for 5 min at room temperature. The supernatant was discarded and 2 ml fresh DMEM/F12 and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), without antibiotics, was added to the tube. The suspension was transferred into 25 ml cell culture flasks and incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator. After 48 h, the medium was discarded, with the non-adherent cells, and 3 ml fresh culture medium was added to the flask. The medium was changed once every 3 days, until cells reached 80–90% confluence. Expression of cluster of differentiation (CD)90, CD45, CD11b and CD44 was detected by flow cytometry. Briefly, passage 3 cells were trypsinized, centrifuged at 60 × g for 5 min at room temperature and were washed with three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Diluted monoclonal mouse anti-CD11b (cat. no. CBL1512 CB11; 1:200; EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) and monoclonal mouse anti-CD44 (eBioscience, Inc., San Diego, USA) were added to the cells and incubated at 4°C for 1 h. PBS was added to the control group. After 1 h, the cells were washed with three times PBS for 5 min. Fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (cat. no. 31635; 1:200; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) was added to the cells and incubated at 4°C for 30 min. The cells were washed 3 times with PBS prior to detection by Epics XL flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Brea, CA, USA).
For CD90 and CD45 direct labeling was conducted with diluted monoclonal mouse anti-CD90(cat. no. 554897; 1:200; BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and monoclonal mouse anti-CD45 antibodies (cat. no. 11-0461; 1:50; eBioscience, Inc.) to washed cell suspension, which was incubated at 4°C for 60 min, washed with PBS and detected by flow cytometer.
Transduction of BMSCs with lentivirus
BMSCs from passage 2 were transduced with the green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene using a lentivirus system (ViraPower™ Lentiviral Packaging mix; Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) in order to follow the movement of transplanted cells.
Optimal multiplicity of infection (MOI) was determined in preliminary experiments. The toxicity and transduction efficacy was compared among MOI 1, 5, 10, 50 and 100, an MOI of 10 was demonstrated to be optimal. To conduct the transduction, BMSCs from passage 2 were added to 24 well plate (1×105 cells/well) with 500 μl DMEM/F12 and 10% FBS, and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 overnight. Subsequently, diluted virus was added into the wells with 5 μl/ml Polybrene (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) with 100 μl DMEM/F12 and 10% FBS and the cells were incubated overnight. After 24 h, the medium was changed and on day 4, 10 ng/ml puromycin (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) was added to each well to produce a homogenous generation of transduced cells. On the following day the medium was changed again and on day 6 the transduction effect was observed using inverted fluorescence microscopy (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Second generation transduced cells were used in the following experiments.
Culture of BMSCs on denuded amniotic membrane
Following obtaining informed consent, human amniotic membranes (HAM) were obtained from healthy pregnant women during their planned caesarean sections. Under sterile conditions, the chorion was manually separated from the amniotic membrane and all remaining blood and chorionic membrane pieces were removed. The HAM was cut into 2×2 mm2 pieces and trypsin/EDTA (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was added to each piece and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 30 min. The detached epithelial layer was removed using a cell scrubber in a gentle manner. The pieces were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and examined by confocal microscopy (Olympus Corporation).
Following confirmation that the HAMs were fully denuded, second generation transduced BMSCs were seeded onto the membranes (1×105 cells/piece). The air-lifting culture technique was used with little culture medium. After 4 days, cells reached confluence and DAPI was used to visualize the nuclei of the cells grown on the denuded (d)-HAM, and examination was conducted under confocal laser scanning microscopy. Following confirmation of positive results, the membranes seeded with BMSCs were used for transplantation.
Preparation of animal models and transplantation
All animal experiments were handled according to the animal protocols approved by Jilin University Animal Care and Use Committee. The Wistar rats were anesthetized by injection of 10% chloral hydrate (4 ml/kg) and anesthetic eye drops were applied for topical anesthesia. Circular discs (diameter, 3 mm) from filter paper were soaked in 0.4 ml 1 mol/l sodium hydroxide solution (Beijing Dingguo Changsheng Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). The disc was applied to the center of the cornea of the right eye for 30 sec, following removal of the disc, the surface of the eye was thoroughly washed by 60 ml normal saline for 1 min. The eyes were examined daily by penlight. The criteria presented in Table II were used for classification of the severity of injury. After 7 days, the rats were anesthetized and the eyes were examined under a slit-lamp microscope following the addition of fluorescein dye using Oftan Flurekain eye drops (Santen Oy, Tampere, Finland). Preliminary data were recorded and the rats received transplantation. The rats used in the present study (n=48) were divided into 3 groups as follows: i) Group 1 (n=16) received subconjunctival injection of BMSCs suspended in PBS; ii) group 2 (n=16) received amniotic membrane transplantation seeded with BMSCs; and iii) group 3 (n=16) received no treatment and served as the control group.
Table II.
Score | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Corneal opacity | No opacity, transparent cornea | Slight opacity, visible pupil and iris texture | Moderate opacity, iris texture is unclear, but pupillary margin is visible | Severe opacity, pupillary margin is visible vaguely | Very severe opacity, nothing can be visualized under cornea |
Epithelial defect | No defect | ≤1/4 of the corneal surface | 1/4–1/2 of the corneal surface | 1/2–3/4 of the corneal surface | ≥3/4 of the corneal surface |
Neovascularization | No vessel | 2 mm within limbus | ≤1/2 of the corneal surface | ≥1/2 of the corneal surface | Total surface of the corneal surface |
Cells from the second generation of lentiviral-transduced BMSCs (1×106) were centrifuged and washed with PBS three times and resuspended in 0.1 ml PBS. Anesthetized rats from group 1 received subconjunctival injection of 0.1 ml PBS containing cells by 1 ml insulin syringe under a ophthalmic surgical microscope. The pieces of d-HAM seeded with BMSCs were divided into 4 pieces (1×1 mm2) and anesthetized rats from group 2 received d-HAM transplantation. Following application of topical anesthetic, the amniotic membrane was placed on the cornea and sutured by six interrupted 10.0 nylon sutures with the epithelial side facing up. Thereafter, eyelids were sutured together by 6.0 nylon sutures. The rats were examined daily with pen light and weekly with a slit-lamp for 4 weeks. Eyelids were opened after 5 days, and the majority of the amniotic membranes were absorbed. After 4 weeks, the animals were sacrificed by chloral hydrate overdose and the corneas were excised for use in the experiments.
Preparation of corneal flat mounts following ink perfusion
This step used five rats from each group. Following anesthesia, the thoracic cavity was opened and thoracic aorta was separated from the surrounding tissue using dissecting scissors to avoid wall disruption. The thoracic aorta was ligated. An intravenous cannula (or catheter) was inserted into the aorta above the ligated site. The right atrium was cut to allow blood outflow and 60 ml normal saline was used to clear the vessels of blood. When the fluid from the atrium was cleared, 10–20 ml ink was injected. The injection was stopped when the eyes, ears and upper limbs of the rat were observed to be staining dark black. The catheter was then removed and the eyeballs were enucleated and post-fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 3 h. The corneas were incised, flattened by four incisions and mounted on glass slides. Images of the slides were captured by a camera attached to the light microscope (Olympus Corporation) and analyzed using Image-Pro Plus 6.0 software (Media Cybernetics, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA).
Cryosections
Cryosectioning was conducted with three eyes from each group. Fresh, enucleated unfixed eyes were frozen in optimal cutting temperature compound (Sakura Finetek USA, Inc., Torrance, CA, USA) on a tissue mold in the cryostat (Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). Sections were cut at 8-μm at −20°C in cryostat and divided into three groups, sections were fixed and dehydrated and stained with hematoxylin and eosin, immediately examined under fluorescent microscope for labeled BMSC detection without fixation or dehydration, or used for immunochemical analyzes to detect vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) levels.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
VEGF protein level was detected using an Rat VEGF Quantikine ELISA kit (R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). From each group 4 corneas were excised, cut into small pieces and homogenized using a glass mortar. Subsequently, 400 μl radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer containing 1% PMSF (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to the pieces and incubated for 30 min on the ice. The mixture was treated with an ultrasonic homogenizer, centrifuged at 350 × g for 5 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was collected for further procedures. The ELISA was performed according to the manufacturer's protocol.
Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)
Total RNA was extracted from four eyes from each group using an RNAiso Plus kit (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Dalian, China) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The mRNA integrity was confirmed by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis.
Following extraction of the mRNA, reverse transcription was performed to synthesize cDNA according to the manufacturer's protocol using One Step SYBR PrimeScript Plus RT-PCR kit (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd.). PCR was conducted using SYBR Green and designed primers from Sangon Biotech (Table I). Each reaction required 1 μl of the previously synthesized cDNA, which was mixed with SGExcelFastSYBR mix, containing ROX (Sangon Company, Shanghai, China), forward and reverse primers, and RNase-free water. The qPCR was performed in a LightCycler 480 II (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland) using the following program: 72°C for 5 min; 94°C for 3 min, stage 3: 94°C for 20 sec, 57°C for 20 sec and 72°C for 20 sec for 40 cycles and 72°C for 3 min. Analysis was performed with LightCycler software, version 1.5.0, which allowed precise analysis of data. Each sample was examined in triplicate.
Table I.
Gene | Primer (5′ to 3′)
|
|
---|---|---|
Forward | Reverse | |
VEGF | CTTGAGTTGGGAGGAGGATG | TGGCAGGCAAACAGACTTC |
MMP-9 | ACCCTGCGTATTTCCATTCA | ATCTCTCCTGCCGAGTTGC |
TLR-2 | AAACTGTGTTCGTGCTTTCTG | GCGTCATTGTTCTCGTCAAA |
TLR-4 | TGGCATCATCTTCATTGTCC | CAGAGCATTGTCCTCCCACT |
β-actin | GCTACAGCTTCACCACCACA | ATCGTACTCCTGCTTGCTGA |
VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; MMP-9, matrix metalloproteinase 9; TLR, Toll-like receptor.
Statistical analysis
Clinical results were calculated using Welch's analysis of variance test with Dunnett's T3 post-hoc test. Mean values and standard deviations were calculated for vessel length and the Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test was used to compare mean values of the three groups. Nonparametric median test was used to compare qPCR and ELISA test results in three groups. All analyses were conducted using SPSS 22.0 (IBM SPSS, Armonk, NY, USA) P≤0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
BMSCs were isolated and characterized
After 48 h isolation, the cells were washed with PBS and non-adherent cells were washed out of the flasks. A number of small colonies of adherent cells were scattered across the bottom of the flasks. After 2–3 days, the cells began to grow and elongate, becoming a spindle shape similar to fibroblasts. Following 2–3 subcultures, cells had typical phenotypic characteristics of BMSCs, they were attached to the bottom of the flask with a spindle-like shape and self-renewal ability (Fig. 1A).
The flow cytometry results demonstrated that 95% of the cells were positive for CD90 expression, 75% were positive for CD44 expression, and expression of CD11b and CD45 were positive in only in 0.5 and 0.2% of cells, respectively (Fig. 1B). This pattern of surface marker expression is consistent with previous descriptions of BMSCs (17,18,20).
Cell transduction with lentivirus was successful
After 6 days, transduction cultures were examined under fluorescence microscopy. Detection of GFP provided evidence of successful transduction and efficacy was ~50–60%. At MOI 10, the virus did not result in toxicity and did not affect the self-renewal ability of the cells (Fig. 1C).
BMSCs were cultured on denuded amniotic membrane
The epithelial layer of the amniotic membrane was removed by enzymatic and mechanical processes. The membranes were stained with DAPI and examined under a confocal laser scanning microscope. Examination indicated that all epithelial cells were effectively removed from the membranes as no DAPI stained cells were observed on the surface of the d-HAM.
Seeded BMSCs exhibited exponential growth on d-HAM and reached confluence within 4 days. Confocal microscopy was used to detect mesenchymal stem cells expressing GFP on the amniotic membranes (Fig. 2).
The rat model was successfully produced with no significant difference in level of injury
A total 48 rats were used in the present study. Slit-lamp examination was conducted on the day of injury and then weekly until week 5 (Fig. 3). Examination on day 1 demonstrated a total epithelial defect at the applied disc area, which stained with fluorescein dye. After 7 days the areas were again stained with the dye in all rats.
Three key characteristics were measured, corneal opacity, area of the neovascularization, and area of the epithelial defect stained with fluorescein. A four scale grading system was used to classify the severity of injury (Table II).
The animals were randomly divided into three groups. Statistical analysis was conducted on data from all the groups to compare the level of injury in each group. The result demonstrated there was no statistically significant difference between groups [P=0.11, confidence limit (CL) 95%] with all animals developing middle to severe level injury. Following treatment, the corneas were examined daily with pen light and weekly with slit-lamp for 4 weeks. At week 4, none of the animals exhibited any adverse reaction to the treatments. Following the final results were obtained in week 4, the animals were sacrificed. Statistical analysis indicated a statistically significant difference in severity within the 3 groups [P=1.9×10−5, confidence interval (CI) 95%] and post-hoc tests indicated that the differences were between group 1 with group 2 (P=0.00016, CI 95%), and group 1 and group 3 (P=0.00037, CI 95%) were also statistically significant. Thus, a single subconjunctival injection of BMSCs had greater impact on corneal wound healing, than BMSCs on amniotic membrane transplantation (Fig. 3).
Length of the vessel, level of VEGF and gene expression of VEGF, MMP-9, Toll-like receptor (TLR)2 and TLR4 were different among the three groups
Ink perfusion was used for improved visualization of new vessels. In total, images of 15 flat mounts were captured by a digital camera attached to a light microscope. The images were processed with Image-Pro Plus 6.0 computer software. Area of neovascularization and total length for each sample was calculated and used for statistical analysis. The results demonstrated that the mean length of the vessels was significantly different among the 3 groups (χ2 =10.50, P=0.005, CL 95%). The level of VEGF protein and gene expression also demonstrated similar differences (Fig. 4). The difference among the 3 groups was significant with P=0.02, CI 95% and according to the post-hoc tests difference was observed between groups 1 and 2 and groups 1 and 3.
VEGF expression significantly decreased following treatment
Results were determined relative to the reference gene, actin, and the level of expression of VEGF was demonstrated to be statistically significant between group 1 and group 2, and group 1 and group 3 (P=0.03, CI 95%; Fig. 4F). The expression of MMP-9 was significantly decreased within the 3 groups, and a difference was observed within group 1 and 2 (P=0.004, CI 95%) and group 1 and 3 (P=0.001, CI 95%; Fig. 4G). No difference in TLR2 and TLR4 gene expression was observed between the 3 groups (P=0.06, CI 95%; Fig. 4H and I).
Histopathology and immunochemistry
Cryosections stained with hematoxylin and eosin demonstrated that the corneas from the group 1 were thinner, the stromas were compact with reduced infiltration of inflammatory cells, and the epithelial layers were fully recovered (Fig. 5). In groups 2 and 3, new vessels were marked in the sections from the central area of the cornea, which were absent in group 1.
To be able to track the movement and localization of the cells, GFP was expressed in the cells. Fresh, non-fixed cryosections were immediately examined under a confocal laser scanning microscope. GFP-positive cells were not detected in the cornea. Thus, the present study suggests stem cells did not migrate into the cornea or transdifferentiate into limbal or corneal cell lines.
Discussion
Corneal blindness has a large impact on society. However, unlike retinal degeneration and glaucoma, it is reversible and the majority of cases of corneal blindness are treatable and preventable.
A number triggers affect the cornea and result in corneal neovascularization, including infection, degeneration, and injury. People in developing countries are more susceptible to these triggers, however, extended contact lens wear is also a risk factor.
The majority of CNV cases require surgical intervention and transplantation is a common therapeutic strategy. These transplantation of a whole cornea or its layers, amniotic membranes, conjunctiva, cultured oral mucosal epithelial cell sheets and limbal stem cells. Transplantation of the whole cornea or certain parts is a common treatment method worldwide. It has 95% success rate, however, for patients with already neovascularized corneal beds, the success rate decreases to 50%. In addition, there is a shortage of donor corneal tissues in the majority of countries, making corneal transplantation an expensive and difficult method, in addition to the requirement for immunosuppression. Thus, medical specialists are aiming to develop novel treatment methods, which can be effective and safe for a greater number of patients. Mesenchymal stem cells are a promising source of cells for transplantation, as they do not raise ethical issues, have low tumorigenesis potential, and they can be used for autologous and allogeneic transplantation. Transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells is also a good option for treatment of corneal injuries. Previous studies have reported the beneficial effect of MSCs in corneal wound healing and neovascularization (24,26,28–30). The majority of the cases used HAM as a bio-scaffold for culture and transplantation of stem cells. However, this technique can be complicated, while subconjunctival injection is a simple technique used in ophthalmic clinics on a daily basis. Thus, direct injection of stem cells under the conjunctiva near the limbus may be a simple and safe method of cell transplantation. Yao et al (28) confirmed that simple subconjunctival injection enhanced corneal wound healing and decreased neovascularization. This procedure can be repeated a number of times. Thus, the present study aimed to investigate this treatment option and to compare the effectiveness and feasibility of two possible application routes, direct subconjunctival injection of stem cells and transplantation on d-HAM. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper to discuss the comparison of these two main routes.
The results of the present study demonstrated that mesenchymal stem cells enhance corneal wound healing and decrease neovascularization (P=1.9×10−5, CI 95%). Notably, the comparison of two application routes demonstrated that the subconjunctival injection is more effective than transplantation with the amniotic membrane (P=0.00016, CI 95%). This may be due to the short survival time of amniotic membranes on the injured corneas. The difference in clinical outcome was predominantly significant for neovascularization, rather than for epithelial defect or opacity. The expression of VEGF was reduced in the treatment groups, particularly in the subconjunctival injection group.
VEGF and MMP-9 gene expression was reduced in the treatment groups compared with the control group. The gene expression levels of TLR2 and TLR4 were close to equal in the 3 groups. Due to the absence of previous studies on these markers, the present study may have observed this outcome as a result of the prolonged observation period. TLR2 and TLR4 are components of innate immune system and are involved in the initiation of the inflammatory process. Thus, TLR2 and TLR4 had returned to their normal level of expression following 5 weeks.
In order to track the movement of the transplanted cells, they were transduced with the GFP gene using lentiviral vectors. Following transplantation (after 4 weeks) no GFP-positive cells were observed in the corneal sections. Thus, the present study hypothesizes that the underlying mechanism of action was trophic factor production and regulation of the inflammatory process and angiogenesis. Histopathology indicated reduced infiltration of inflammatory cells and neovascularization in the treatment groups, compared with the control.
None of the animals in the present study exhibited an adverse reaction to the treatment. Transplantation of allogeneic cells was successful without episodes of immune rejection.
Corneal blindness is the second leading cause of blindness worldwide and is an important health burden. A number of treatment methods have been implemented in ophthalmic clinics for treatment of CNV, however, for certain patients none of the current options are acceptable. The majority of modern therapeutic strategies are expensive and require specific equipment and skilled professionals. Developing countries, in particular, have a shortage of those and a high rate of corneal involvement. The development of inexpensive, feasible and effective treatment methods in these areas are key. Subconjunctival injection is a simple technique routinely used in eye centers around the world. Mesenchymal stem cells can be easily obtained from 'medical wastes', including ex placenta and amniotic fluid after delivery, adipose tissue after liposuction and be safely used in autologous and allogeneic transplantations. They have been used in various animal studies and numerous clinical trials. All reports on their safety issues have been satisfactory.
In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that single subconjunctival injection of stem cells is more effective, than their transplantation using amniotic membranes. This method requires further investigation and there are two currently running clinical trials using mesenchymal stem cells in corneal disease. However, further clinical trials must be conducted prior to gaining approval for use in clinical practice. This method may fulfill requirements for an effective treatment and has potential to be in clinical use in the near future.
Acknowledgments
The present study was supported by the NSFC Fund, and Science and Technology Department (grant no. 20130413025GH) and Health Department of Jilin Province (grant no. 2013Q005) funds.
References
- 1.Robaei D, Watson S. Corneal blindness: A global problem. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2014;42:213–214. doi: 10.1111/ceo.12330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Whitcher JP, Srinivasan M, Upadhyay MP. Corneal blindness: A global perspective. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79:214–221. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Alvord LA, Hall WJ, Keyes LD, Morgan CF, Winterton LC. Corneal oxygen distribution with contact lens wear. Cornea. 2007;26:654–664. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31804f5a22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Martins TG, Costa AL, Alves MR, Gonçalves MM. Contact lens use with intraestromal hemorrhage secondary to corneal neovascularization. Einstein (Sao Paulo) 2012;10:524–525. doi: 10.1590/S1679-45082012000400023. In English, Portuguese. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cursiefen C, Küchle M, Naumann GO. Angiogenesis in corneal diseases: Histopathologic evaluation of 254 human corneal buttons with neovascularization. Cornea. 1998;17:611–613. doi: 10.1097/00003226-199811000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Giacomini C, Ferrari G, Bignami F, Rama P. Alkali burn versus suture-induced corneal neovascularization in C57BL/6 mice: An overview of two common animal models of corneal neovascularization. Exp Eye Res. 2014;121:1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2014.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hsu CC, Chang HM, Lin TC, Hung KH, Chien KH, Chen SY, Chen SN, Chen YT. Corneal neovascularization and contemporary antiangiogenic therapeutics. J Chin Med Assoc. 2015;78:323–330. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2014.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kenyon KR, Tseng SC. Limbal autograft transplantation for ocular surface disorders. O. phthalmology. 1989;96:709–722. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(89)32833-8. discussion 722–723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kolli S, Ahmad S, Mudhar HS, Meeny A, Lako M, Figueiredo FC. Successful application of ex vivo expanded human autologous oral mucosal epithelium for the treatment of total bilateral limbal stem cell deficiency. Stem Cells. 2014;32:2135–2146. doi: 10.1002/stem.1694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lee JY, Jeong HJ, Kim MK, Wee WR. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells affect immunologic profiling of interleukin-17-secreting cells in a chemical burn mouse model. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2014;28:246–256. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2014.28.3.246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kwitko S, Marinho D, Barcaro S, Bocaccio F, Rymer S, Fernandes S, Neumann J. Allograft conjunctival transplantation for bilateral ocular surface disorders. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:1020–1025. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(95)30918-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chan AA, Hertsenberg AJ, Funderburgh ML, Mann MM, Du Y, Davoli KA, Mich-Basso JD, Yang L, Funderburgh JL. Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells into cells with corneal keratocyte phenotype. PLoS One. 2013;8:e56831. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Arnalich-Montiel F, Pastor S, Blazquez-Martinez A, Fernandez-Delgado J, Nistal M, Alio JL, De Miguel MP. Adipose-derived stem cells are a source for cell therapy of the corneal stroma. Stem Cells. 2008;26:570–579. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cejkova J, Trosan P, Cejka C, Lencova A, Zajicova A, Javorkova E, Kubinova S, Sykova E, Holan V. Suppression of alkali-induced oxidative injury in the cornea by mesenchymal stem cells growing on nanofiber scaffolds and transferred onto the damaged corneal surface. Exp Eye Res. 2013;116:312–323. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2013.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gu S, Xing C, Han J, Tso MO, Hong J. Differentiation of rabbit bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells into corneal epithelial cells in vivo and ex vivo. Mol Vis. 2009;15:99–107. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jiang TS, Cai L, Ji WY, Hui YN, Wang YS, Hu D, Zhu J. Reconstruction of the corneal epithelium with induced marrow mesenchymal stem cells in rats. Mol Vis. 2010;16:1304–1316. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bianco P, Riminucci M, Gronthos S, Robey PG. Bone marrow stromal stem cells: Nature, biology, and potential applications. Stem Cells. 2001;19:180–192. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.19-3-180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Herzog EL, Chai L, Krause DS. Plasticity of marrow-derived stem cells. Blood. 2003;102:3483–3493. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-05-1664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tse WT, Pendleton JD, Beyer WM, Egalka MC, Guinan EC. Suppression of allogeneic T-cell proliferation by human marrow stromal cells: Implications in transplantation. Transplantation. 2003;75:389–397. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000045055.63901.A9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ribeiro A, Laranjeira P, Mendes S, Velada I, Leite C, Andrade P, Santos F, Henriques A, Grãos M, Cardoso CM, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells from umbilical cord matrix, adipose tissue and bone marrow exhibit different capability to suppress peripheral blood B, natural killer and T cells. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2013;4:125. doi: 10.1186/scrt336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ma Y, Xu Y, Xiao Z, Yang W, Zhang C, Song E, Du Y, Li L. Reconstruction of chemically burned rat corneal surface by bone marrow-derived human mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells. 2006;24:315–321. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Guo T, Wang W, Zhang J, Chen X, Li BZ, Li LS. Experimental study on repairing damage of corneal surface by mesenchymal stem cells transplantation. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2006;42:246–250. In Chinese. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ye J, Yao K, Kim JC. Mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in a rabbit corneal alkali burn model: Engraftment and involvement in wound healing. Eye (Lond) 2006;20:482–490. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6701913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Liu XW, Zhao JL. Transplantation of autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of corneal endothelium damages in rabbits. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2007;43:540–545. In Chinese. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Oh JY, Kim MK, Shin MS, Lee HJ, Ko JH, Wee WR, Lee JH. The anti-inflammatory and anti-angiogenic role of mesenchymal stem cells in corneal wound healing following chemical injury. Stem Cells. 2008;26:1047–1055. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Reinshagen H, Auw-Haedrich C, Sorg RV, Boehringer D, Eberwein P, Schwartzkopff J, Sundmacher R, Reinhard T. Corneal surface reconstruction using adult mesenchymal stem cells in experimental limbal stem cell deficiency in rabbits. Acta Ophthalmol. 2011;89:741–748. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01812.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Liu H, Zhang J, Liu CY, Hayashi Y, Kao WW. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells can differentiate and assume corneal keratocyte phenotype. J Cell Mol Med. 2012;16:1114–1124. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2011.01418.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yao L, Li ZR, Su WR, Li YP, Lin ML, Zhang WX, Liu Y, Wan Q, Liang D. Role of mesenchymal stem cells on cornea wound healing induced by acute alkali burn. PLoS One. 2012;7:e30842. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pinarli FA, Okten G, Beden U, Fışgın T, Kefeli M, Kara N, Duru F, Tomak L. Keratinocyte growth factor-2 and autologous serum potentiate the regenerative effect of mesenchymal stem cells in cornea damage in rats. Int J Ophthalmol. 2014;7:211–219. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.02.05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Rohaina CM, Then KY, Ng AM, Wan Abdul Halim WH, Zahidin AZ, Saim A, Idrus RB. Reconstruction of limbal stem cell deficient corneal surface with induced human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells on amniotic membrane. Transl Res. 2014;163:200–210. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2013.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Du Y, Roh DS, Funderburgh ML, Mann MM, Marra KG, Rubin JP, Li X, Funderburgh JL. Adipose-derived stem cells differentiate to keratocytes in vitro. Mol Vis. 2010;16:2680–2689. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Martinez-Conesa EM, Espel E, Reina M, Casaroli-Marano RP. Characterization of ocular surface epithelial and progenitor cell markers in human adipose stromal cells derived from lipoaspirates. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:513–520. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-7550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Monteiro BG, Serafim RC, Melo GB, Silva MC, Lizier NF, Maranduba CM, Smith RL, Kerkis A, Cerruti H, Gomes JA, Kerkis I. Human immature dental pulp stem cells share key characteristic features with limbal stem cells. Cell Prolif. 2009;42:587–594. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2009.00623.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nieto-Miguel T, Galindo S, Reinoso R, Corell A, Martino M, Pérez-Simón JA, Calonge M. In vitro simulation of corneal epithelium microenvironment induces a corneal epithelial-like cell phenotype from human adipose tissue mesenchymal stem cells. Curr Eye Res. 2013;38:933–944. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2013.802809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zeppieri M, Salvetat ML, Beltrami AP, Cesselli D, Bergamin N, Russo R, Cavaliere F, Varano GP, Alcalde I, Merayo J, et al. Human adipose-derived stem cells for the treatment of chemically burned rat cornea: Preliminary results. Curr Eye Res. 2013;38:451–463. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2012.763100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Soleimani M, Nadri S. A protocol for isolation and culture of mesenchymal stem cells from mouse bone marrow. Nat Protoc. 2009;4:102–106. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]