Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2016 Sep 29;4(5):e00887-16. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00887-16

Genome Sequences of 11 Human Vaginal Actinobacteria Strains

Amanda L Lewis a,b,d,, Grace E Deitzler a,d, Maria J Ruiz a, Cory Weimer a,d, SoEun Park a,d, Lloyd S Robinson a,d, Kymberlie Hallsworth-Pepin c,e, Aye Wollam c,e, Makedonka Mitreva c,e, Warren G Lewis c,d,
PMCID: PMC5043546  PMID: 27688328

Abstract

The composition of the vaginal microbiota is an important health determinant. Several members of the phylum Actinobacteria have been implicated in bacterial vaginosis, a condition associated with many negative health outcomes. Here, we present 11 strains of vaginal Actinobacteria (now available through BEI Resources) along with draft genome sequences.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a vaginal dysbiosis associated with serious health complications (16). It is characterized by the absence of Lactobacillus species in the vagina and overgrowth of a polymicrobial community often containing members of the phylum Actinobacteria, including Gardnerella vaginalis, Atopobium spp., and others. In fact, G. vaginalis was recently shown to elicit several features of BV in a mouse vaginal infection model (7, 8). Bifidobacteria are also commonly isolated from the vagina, although members of this genus are rarely found in pathological contexts. Here, we isolated 11 vaginal bacteria from the phylum Actinobacteria. Vaginal swabs were collected from nonpregnant and pregnant women according to Washington University institutional review board (IRB)-approved protocols (201108155 and 20110382). Organisms isolated from vaginal swabs were cultured anaerobically, and identification was performed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Genomic DNA was obtained using the Wizard genomic DNA purification kit (Promega). Methodological details on isolation and clinical information will be described elsewhere.

Genomes were assembled de novo using the One Button Velvet assembly pipeline (version 1.1.06) (9) with hash sizes of 31, 33, and 35 after downsizing the sample input data to 100× coverage. An internal core gene screen on the assembly tested for completeness of the genome. After assembly, the minimum length for contigs was set to 200 bp, and an internal core gene screen was performed as defined by the Human Microbiome Project (HMP) (10). Then, adapters were removed, and low-quality regions were trimmed. Finally, a screen for contamination was performed. The process of gene annotation included generating both ab initio and evidence-based (BLAST) predictions. Functional predictions of coding sequences were made using GeneMark and Glimmer3 (11, 12). Loci were then defined by clustering predictions with the same reading frame. We evaluated predictions using the nonredundant (NR) and Pfam databases and resolved overlaps between adjacent coding genes. Intergenic regions not spanned by GeneMark and Glimmer3 were subject to a BLAST search against NCBI’s NR database and predictions generated based on protein alignments. tRNA genes were determined using tRNAscan-SE (13) and noncoding RNA genes by RNAmmer (14) and Rfam (15). Metabolic pathways and subcellular localization were predicted using KEGG and PSORTb, respectively (16, 17), and functional domains were evaluated using InterProScan (18).

Accession number(s).

These whole-genome shotgun projects have been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers listed in Table 1. We have also made the strains available to the research community by depositing them with the Biodefense and Emerging Infections (BEI) Research Resource Repository (see BEI numbers in Table 1).

TABLE 1 .

Identifiers and nucleotide sequences for sequenced strains of vaginal Actinobacteria

Genus/species Strain BEI catalog no. Nucleotide accession no.
Actinomyces neuii MJR8396A HMS-1266 LRPJ00000000
Alloscardovia omnicolens CMW7705A HMS-1282 LRPK00000000
Atopobium vaginae CMW7778A HMS-1300 LSOA00000000
Bifidobacterium bifidum MJR8628B HMS-1264 LRPO00000000
Bifidobacterium breve GED8481 HMS-1261 LRPP00000000
Bifidobacterium longum CMW7750 HMS-1299 LRPQ00000000
Corynebacterium sp. CMW7794 HMS-1295 LSRB00000000
Gardnerella vaginalis GED7275B HMS-1272 LRPZ00000000
Gardnerella vaginalis GED7760B HMS-1284 LRQA00000000
Gardnerella vaginalis CMW7778B HMS-1298 LSRC00000000
Propionibacterium avidum MJR7694 HMS-1291 LRVD00000000

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We acknowledge Justin Perry, Deborah Frank, and the Women’s and Infant’s Health Specimen Consortium (especially Michele Landeau). We also thank Jeff Peipert, Jenifer Allsworth, and Jennifer Bick of the Contraceptive CHOICE project for providing specimens from nonpregnant women.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by the Burroughs-Wellcome Fund Preterm Birth Initiative (A.L.L.). Summer stipends were provided by the Planning Center for Research in Benign Urology Summer Research Program (P20DK097798 to G.E.D.) and the Washington University in St. Louis Summer Research Program in Global Health with the Center for Global Health & Infectious Disease (CGHID)/Institute for Public Health (3054-93396B to M.J.R.).

Footnotes

For a commentary on this article, see doi:10.1128/genomeA.00890-16.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Wiesenfeld HC, Hillier SL, Krohn MA, Landers DV, Sweet RL. 2003. Bacterial vaginosis is a strong predictor of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Clin Infect Dis 36:663–668. doi: 10.1086/367658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Marrazzo JM, Martin DH, Watts DH, Schulte J, Sobel JD, Hillier SL, Deal C, Fredricks DN. 2010. Bacterial vaginosis: identifying research gaps proceedings of a workshop sponsored by DHHS/NIH/NIAID. Sex Transm Dis 37:732–744. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181fbbc95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hillier SL, Nugent RP, Eschenbach DA, Krohn MA, Gibbs RS, Martin DH, Cotch MF, Edelman R, Pastorek JG 2nd, Rao AV, McNellis D, Regan JA, Carey C, Klebanoff MA. 1995. Association between bacterial vaginosis and preterm delivery of a low-birth-weight infant. The Vaginal Infections and Prematurity Study Group. N Engl J Med 333:1737–1742. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199512283332604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bradshaw CS, Morton AN, Hocking J, Garland SM, Morris MB, Moss LM, Horvath LB, Kuzevska I, Fairley CK. 2006. High recurrence rates of bacterial vaginosis over the course of 12 months after oral metronidazole therapy and factors associated with recurrence. J Infect Dis 193:1478–1486. doi: 10.1086/503780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wilson J. 2004. Managing recurrent bacterial vaginosis. Sex Transm Infect 80:8–11. doi: 10.1136/sti.2002.002733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Allsworth JE, Peipert JF. 2007. Prevalence of bacterial vaginosis: 2001–2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data. Obstet Gynecol 109:114–120. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000247627.84791.91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gilbert NM, O’Brien VP, Hultgren S, Macones G, Lewis WG, Lewis AL. 2013. Urinary tract infection as a preventable cause of pregnancy complications: opportunities, challenges, and a global call to action. Global Adv Health Med 2:59–69. doi: 10.7453/gahmj.2013.061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lewis WG, Robinson LS, Gilbert NM, Perry JC, Lewis AL. 2013. Degradation, foraging, and depletion of mucus sialoglycans by the vagina-adapted actinobacterium Gardnerella vaginalis. J Biol Chem 288:12067–12079. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.453654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zerbino DR, Birney E. 2008. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res 18:821–829. doi: 10.1101/gr.074492.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nelson KE, Weinstock GM, Highlander SK, Worley KC, Creasy HH, Wortman JR, Rusch DB, Mitreva M, Sodergren E, Chinwalla AT, Feldgarden M, Gevers D, Haas BJ, Madupu R, Ward DV, Birren BW, Gibbs RA, Methe B, Petrosino JF, Strausberg RL, Sutton GG, White OR, Wilson RK, Durkin S, Giglio MG, Gujja S, Howarth C, Kodira CD, Kyrpides N, Mehta T, Muzny DM, Pearson M, Pepin K, Pati A, Qin X, Yandava C, Zeng Q, Zhang L, Berlin AM, Chen L, Hepburn TA, Johnson J, McCorrison J, Miller J, Minx P, Nusbaum C, Russ C, Sykes SM, Tomlinson CM, Young S, et al.. 2010. A catalog of reference genomes from the human microbiome. Science 328:994–999. doi: 10.1126/science.1183605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Borodovsky M, Mills R, Besemer J, Lomsadze A. 2003. Prokaryotic gene prediction using GeneMark and GeneMark.Hmm. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics Chapter 4:Unit 4.5. doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi0405s01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Delcher AL, Harmon D, Kasif S, White O, Salzberg SL. 1999. Improved microbial gene identification with GLIMMER. Nucleic Acids Res 27:4636–4641. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.23.4636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lowe TM, Eddy SR. 1997. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 25:955–964. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.5.0955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rødland EA, Staerfeldt H-H, Rognes T, Ussery DW. 2007. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 35:3100–3108. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Griffiths-Jones S, Moxon S, Marshall M, Khanna A, Eddy SR, Bateman A. 2005. Rfam: annotating non-coding RNAs in complete genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 33:D121–D124. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kanehisa M, Goto S, Kawashima S, Okuno Y, Hattori M. 2004. The KEGG resource for deciphering the genome. Nucleic Acids Res 32:D277–D280. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yu NY, Wagner JR, Laird MR, Melli G, Rey S, Lo R, Dao P, Sahinalp SC, Ester M, Foster LJ, Brinkman FS. 2010. PSORTb 3.0: improved protein subcellular localization prediction with refined localization subcategories and predictive capabilities for all prokaryotes. Bioinformatics 26:1608–1615. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Quevillon E, Silventoinen V, Pillai S, Harte N, Mulder N, Apweiler R, Lopez R. 2005. InterProScan: protein domains identifier. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W116–W120. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES