Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2016 Sep 29;4(5):e00888-16. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00888-16

Genome Sequences of 14 Firmicutes Strains Isolated from the Human Vagina

Grace E Deitzler a,d, Maria J Ruiz a,d, Cory Weimer a,d, SoEun Park a,d, Lloyd Robinson a,d, Kymberlie Hallsworth-Pepin e, Aye Wollam e, Makedonka Mitreva c,e, Amanda L Lewis a,b,d,, Warren G Lewis c,d,
PMCID: PMC5043547  PMID: 27688329

Abstract

Research on vaginal infections is currently limited by a lack of available fully sequenced bacterial reference strains. Here, we present strains (now available through BEI Resources) and genome sequences for a set of 14 vaginal isolates from the phylum Firmicutes. These genome sequences provide a valuable resource for future research in understanding the role of Gram-positive bacteria in vaginal health and disease.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

A variety of health outcomes have been associated with specific bacteria or bacterial patterns colonizing the human vagina. For example, bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a common dysbiosis of the vaginal microbiota that is associated with increased risks of sexually transmitted infections and serious complications during pregnancy, such as intrauterine infections and preterm labor (16). BV is generally characterized by the absence of vaginal Lactobacillus and overgrowth of diverse microbes, including Firmicutes, such as Anaerococcus, Finegoldia, Megasphaera, Peptoniphilus, and Veillonella species. However, little is known about the strategies these bacteria use to colonize the vagina or whether they are involved in the causes and complications associated with BV. We isolated 15 Firmicutes from vaginal swabs of healthy and BV-affected pregnant and nonpregnant women. While some of these bacterial species may have sequenced reference strains, there are very few strains from the human vagina whose genomes have been previously sequenced.

Vaginal swabs were collected from nonpregnant and pregnant women according to Washington University institutional review board (IRB)-approved protocols 201108155 and 20110382, respectively. Organisms were isolated from these swabs anaerobically on solid medium. Isolation procedures and clinical information will be described in a future publication. The culture conditions for each strain have been provided to BEI Resources. Sequencing of 16s rRNA genes >1,400 bp were used to initially assign bacteria genus and species identifications by comparison with the NCBI ribosomal database. Genomic DNA was obtained using the Wizard genomic DNA purification kit (Promega).

De novo assembly of genomes were conducted using the One Button Velvet assembly pipeline (version 1.1.06) (7), with hash sizes of 31, 33, and 35 after downsizing the sample input data to 100× coverage. A minimum length for contigs was set (postassembly) at 200 bp. We performed a screen for core genes (as defined by the HMP [8]) on many of the assemblies to test for completeness of the genome. Gene annotation was performed using both ab initio and evidence-based (BLAST) predictions. Coding sequences were predicted using GeneMark and Glimmer3 (9, 10). Intergenic regions not identified by GeneMark and Glimmer3 were searched by BLAST in NCBI’s nonredundant bacterial (NR) database. The best prediction for each open reading frame was selected by evaluating all predictions against the best evidence (nonredundant bacterial, NR, and Pfam [11]) and resolving overlaps between adjacent coding genes. tRNA genes were determined using tRNAscan-SE (12) and noncoding RNA genes by RNAmmer (13) and Rfam (14). Metabolic pathways and subcellular localization were predicted using KEGG (15) and PSORTb (16), respectively, and functional domains were evaluated using InterProScan (17).

Accession number(s).

These whole-genome shotgun projects have been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers listed in Table 1. The sequences described in this paper are the first versions. We have also made the strains available to the research community by depositing them with the Biodefense and Emerging Infections (BEI) Research Resource Repository (see BEI numbers in Table 1).

TABLE 1 .

Strain names and accession numbers

Species Strain BEI catalog no. Nucleotide sequence accession no.
Anaerococcus tetradius MJR8151 HMS-1268 LRPM00000000
Bacillus coagulans GED7749B HMS-1281 LRPN00000000
Clostridium perfringens MJR7757A HMS-1290 LRPU00000000
Enterococcus faecium MJR8396B HMS-1267 LRPV00000000
Finegoldia magna GED7760A HMS-1285 LRPW00000000
Megasphaera sp. MJR9396C HMS-1269 LRVC00000000
Peptoniphilus harei CMW7756A HMS-1297 LRQE00000000
Peptostreptococcus anaerobius MJR8628A HMS-1263 LSQZ00000000
Staphylococcus lugdunensis MJR7738 HMS-1293 LRQI00000000
Staphylococcus simulans MJR7712 HMS-1283 LRQJ00000000
Streptococcus mitis CMW7705B HMS-1296 LRQR00000000
Streptococcus pasteurianus GED7275A HMS-1273 LSRA00000000
Streptococcus salivarius GED7778A HMS-1287 LRQS00000000
Veillonella atypica CMW7756B HMS-1301 LRQT00000000

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Justin Perry for technical assistance, Deborah Frank for editorial assistance, and the Women’s and Infant’s Health Specimen Consortium (especially Michele Landeau) for assistance with the collection of vaginal swabs from pregnant women. We also thank Jenifer Allsworth, Jeff Peipert, and Jennifer Bick of the Contraceptive CHOICE project for providing specimens from nonpregnant women. We also appreciate the generosity of the women who participated in this research.

This work was funded by the Burroughs-Wellcome Fund preterm Birth Initiative (A.L.L.). Summer stipends were provided by the Planning Center for Research in Benign Urology Summer Research Program P20DK097798 (G.E.D.) and the Washington University in St. Louis Global Health Center of the Institute for Public Health (M.J.R.).

Footnotes

For a commentary on this article, see doi:10.1128/genomeA.00890-16.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Atashili J, Poole C, Ndumbe PM, Adimora AA, Smith JS. 2008. Bacterial vaginosis and HIV acquisition: a meta-analysis of published studies. AIDS 22:1493–1501. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283021a37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hillier SL, Nugent RP, Eschenbach DA, Krohn MA, Gibbs RS, Martin DH, Cotch MF, Edelman R, Pastorek JG Jr, Rao AV. 1995. Association between bacterial vaginosis and preterm delivery of a low-birth-weight infant. The Vaginal Infections and Prematurity Study Group. N Engl J Med 333:1737–1742. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199512283332604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hitti J, Hillier SL, Agnew KJ, Krohn MA, Reisner DP, Eschenbach DA. 2001. Vaginal indicators of amniotic fluid infection in preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol 97:211–219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Holst E, Goffeng AR, Andersch B. 1994. Bacterial vaginosis and vaginal microorganisms in idiopathic premature labor and association with pregnancy outcome. J Clin Microbiol 32:176–186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wiesenfeld HC, Hillier SL, Krohn MA, Landers DV, Sweet RL. 2003. Bacterial vaginosis is a strong predictor of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Clin Infect Dis 36:663–668. doi: 10.1086/367658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhang X, Xu X, Li J, Li N, Yan T, Ju X. 2002. Relationship between vaginal sialidase bacteria vaginosis and chorioammionitis. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 37:588–590. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zerbino DR, Birney E. 2008. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res 18:821–829. doi: 10.1101/gr.074492.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Human Microbiome Project Consortium 2012. A framework for human microbiome research. Nature 486:215–221. doi: 10.1038/nature11209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Borodovsky M, Mills R, Besemer J, Lomsadze A. 2003. Prokaryotic gene prediction using GeneMark and GeneMark.Hmm. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics Chapter 4:Unit 4.5. doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi0405s01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Delcher AL, Harmon D, Kasif S, White O, Salzberg SL. 1999. Improved microbial gene identification with GLIMMER. Nucleic Acids Res 27:4636–4641. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.23.4636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Finn RD, Tate J, Mistry J, Coggill PC, Sammut SJ, Hotz HR, Ceric G, Forslund K, Eddy SR, Sonnhammer EL, Bateman A. 2008. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 36:D281–D288. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lowe TM, Eddy SR. 1997. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 25:955–964. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.5.0955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rødland EA, Staerfeldt H-H, Rognes T, Ussery DW. 2007. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 35:3100–3108. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Griffiths-Jones S, Moxon S, Marshall M, Khanna A, Eddy SR, Bateman A. 2005. Rfam: annotating non-coding RNAs in complete genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 33:D121–D124. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kanehisa M, Goto S, Kawashima S, Okuno Y, Hattori M. 2004. The KEGG resource for deciphering the genome. Nucleic Acids Res 32:D277–D280. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yu NY, Wagner JR, Laird MR, Melli G, Rey S, Lo R, Dao P, Sahinalp SC, Ester M, Foster LJ, Brinkman FS. 2010. PSORTb 3.0: improved protein subcellular localization prediction with refined localization subcategories and predictive capabilities for all prokaryotes. Bioinformatics 26:1608–1615. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Quevillon E, Silventoinen V, Pillai S, Harte N, Mulder N, Apweiler R, Lopez R. 2005. InterProScan: protein domains identifier. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W116–W120. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES