Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 1992 Nov;76(11):642–645. doi: 10.1136/bjo.76.11.642

Myopia following penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus.

S J Tuft 1, F W Fitzke 1, R J Buckley 1
PMCID: PMC504365  PMID: 1477036

Abstract

The frequent occurrence of spherical myopia after penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus is partly the result of the excessive dioptric power of the grafted cornea which occurs when the diameter selected for the donor button is greater than the diameter of the host incision. This excessive power could be reduced by eliminating disparity between the diameters of the graft and host. To determine what proportion of the myopia in these eyes would persist as a result of axial myopia the axial lengths of 60 patients grafted for keratoconus and 25 emmetropic controls were compared. A keratometry, objective refraction, and contact probe ultrasonic biometry were performed on all eyes. A comparison of the results with a representational schematic eye indicated that the mean spherical refractive error of the grafted keratoconic eyes (-4.83 dioptres) was the combined effect of steepness of the corneal graft (mean radius of curvature 7.46 mm) and an abnormally great axial length (mean 24.84 mm). The increased axial length was mainly the result of elongation of the posterior segment of the globe with a small contribution from an increased anterior chamber depth. Though axial myopia is common in keratoconus, a further study of 70 keratoconic eyes that had not been grafted showed no statistically significant correlation between the posterior segment length and the severity of corneal ectasia. These data suggest that even if excessive corneal power is eliminated after penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus the associated axial myopia would still produce a mean spherical refractive error of at least -2.8 dioptres.

Full text

PDF
642

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brooks A. M., Robertson I. F., Mahoney A. M. Ocular rigidity and intraocular pressure in keratoconus. Aust J Ophthalmol. 1984 Nov;12(4):317–324. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.1984.tb01175.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cohen K. L., Holman R. E., Tripoli N. K., Kupper L. L. Effect of trephine tilt on corneal button dimensions. Am J Ophthalmol. 1986 Jun 15;101(6):722–725. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(86)90777-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cohen K. L., Tripoli N. K., Pellom A. C., Kupper L. L., Fryczkowski A. W. Effect of tissue fit on corneal shape after transplantation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1984 Oct;25(10):1226–1231. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Duran J. A., Malvar A., Diez E. Corneal dioptric power after penetrating keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol. 1989 Aug;73(8):657–660. doi: 10.1136/bjo.73.8.657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Epstein R. J., Seedor J. A., Dreizen N. G., Stulting R. D., Waring G. O., 3rd, Wilson L. A., Cavanagh H. D. Penetrating keratoplasty for herpes simplex keratitis and keratoconus. Allograft rejection and survival. Ophthalmology. 1987 Aug;94(8):935–944. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(87)33356-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fitzke F. W., Hayes B. P., Hodos W., Holden A. L. Electrophysiological optometry using Scheiner's principle in the pigeon eye. J Physiol. 1985 Dec;369:17–31. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1985.sp015885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Foulks G. N., Perry H. D., Dohlman C. H. Oversize corneal donor grafts in penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 1979 Mar;86(3):490–494. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(79)35505-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Girard L. J., Eguez I., Esnaola N., Barnett L., Maghraby A. Effect of penetrating keratoplasty using grafts of various sizes on keratoconic myopia and astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1988 Sep;14(5):541–547. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(88)80013-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Heidemann D. G., Sugar A., Meyer R. F., Musch D. C. Oversized donor grafts in penetrating keratoplasty. A randomized trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985 Dec;103(12):1807–1811. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1985.01050120041016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ihalainen A. Clinical and epidemiological features of keratoconus genetic and external factors in the pathogenesis of the disease. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl. 1986;178:1–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Irvine A. R., Kaufman H. E. Intraolar pressure following penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1969 Nov;68(5):835–844. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(69)94577-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jensen A. D., Maumenee A. E. Refractive errors following keratoplasty. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1974;72:123–131. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lanier J. D., Bullington R. H., Jr, Prager T. C. Axial length in keratoconus. Cornea. 1992 May;11(3):250–254. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Olson R. J. Aphakic keratoplasty. Determining donor tissue size to avoid elevated intraocular pressure. Arch Ophthalmol. 1978 Dec;96(12):2274–2276. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1978.03910060570022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Olson R. J. The effect of scleral fixation ring placement and trephine tilting on keratoplasty wound size and donor shape. Ophthalmic Surg. 1981 Jan;12(1):23–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Olson R. J. Variation in corneal graft size related to trephine technique. Arch Ophthalmol. 1979 Jul;97(7):1323–1325. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1979.01020020065015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Paglen P. G., Fine M., Abbott R. L., Webster R. G., Jr The prognosis for keratoplasty in keratoconus. Ophthalmology. 1982 Jun;89(6):651–654. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(82)34753-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Perl T., Charlton K. H., Binder P. S. Disparate diameter grafting. Astigmatism, intraocular pressure, and visual acuity. Ophthalmology. 1981 Aug;88(8):774–781. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(81)34953-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Perry H. D., Foulks G. N. Oversize donor buttons in corneal transplantation surgery for keratoconus. Ophthalmic Surg. 1987 Oct;18(10):751–752. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Polack F. M. Glaucoma in keratoplasty. Cornea. 1988;7(1):67–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ruben M., Colebrook E. Keratoconus keratoplasty curvatures and contact lens wear. Br J Ophthalmol. 1979 Apr;63(4):268–273. doi: 10.1136/bjo.63.4.268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Snead M. P., Rubinstein M. P., Lea S. H., Haworth S. M. Calculated versus A-scan result for axial length using different types of ultrasound probe tip. Eye (Lond) 1990;4(Pt 5):718–722. doi: 10.1038/eye.1990.101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Troutman R. C. Astigmatic considerations in corneal graft. Ophthalmic Surg. 1979 May;10(5):21–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Troutman R. C., Lawless M. A. Penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. Cornea. 1987;6(4):298–305. doi: 10.1097/00003226-198706040-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Troutman R. C., Meltzer M. Astigmatism and myopia in keratoconus. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1972;70:265–277. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wilson S. E., Bourne W. M. Effect of recipient-donor trephine size disparity on refractive error in keratoconus. Ophthalmology. 1989 Mar;96(3):299–305. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(89)32896-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Zimmerman T., Olson R., Waltman S., Kaufman H. Transplant size and elevated intraocular pressure. Postkeratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol. 1978 Dec;96(12):2231–2233. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1978.03910060533012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. van Rij G., Waring G. O., 3rd Configuration of corneal trephine opening using five different trephines in human donor eyes. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988 Sep;106(9):1228–1233. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1988.01060140388039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES