Skip to main content
PMC home page
Oncotarget logoLink to Oncotarget
. 2016 Apr 18;7(20):29749–29760. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8831

Suppression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in hepatocellular carcinoma cells by Krüppel-like factor 4

Qi Li 1,2,#, Weifeng Song 1,#, Weiyu Wang 3,#, Shanshan Yao 2, Chuan Tian 2, Xun Cai 1, Liwei Wang 1
PMCID: PMC5045430  PMID: 27102441

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most malignant and lethal human cancers. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) enhances the carcinogenesis of HCC, and therapies targeting EMT appear to be promising treatments. We have previously shown that Krüppel-like Factor 4 (KLF4) suppressed EMT of HCC cells through downregulating EMT-associated proteins. Here, we examined the roles of microRNAs (miRNAs) in KLF4-regulated EMT in HCC cells. KLF4 induced expression of 3 miRNAs (miR-153, miR-506 and miR-200b) that targeted 3′-UTR of Snail1, Slug and ZEB1 mRNAs, respectively, to inhibit protein translation in HCC cells, which was confirmed by promoter luciferase assay. Expression of either miRNA significantly inhibited HCC cell growth and invasiveness, while the effect of combined expression of all 3 miRNAs was more pronounced. Furthermore, overexpression of antisense of all 3 miRNAs abolished the inhibitory effect of KLF4 on HCC cell growth and invasiveness. Together, our data suggest that KLF4 inhibits EMT-enhanced HCC growth and invasion, possibly through reducing EMT-related proteins Snail1, Slug and ZEB1 via increasing miR-153, miR-506 and miR-200b.

Keywords: Krüppel-like factor 4, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, hepatocellular carcinoma, microRNA

INTRODUCTION

The malignancy of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) largely results from its aggressive characteristics [1–6]. Hence, targeting therapies upon the invasiveness and metastases of HCC may be effective treatments.

The zinc finger protein Krüppel-like factor 4 (KLF4) regulates gene transcription and cell fate in a context-dependent manner, and has been shown to promote cell differentiation, and to suppress tumor growth stem cell and malignant progression [7–9]. First of all, KLF4 is dispensable for early development [7–9]. Moreover, when KLF4 is expressed in adult somatic cells with other Yamanaka factors [10, 11], KLF4 has been shown to promote the formation of induced pluripotent stem (IPS) cells [12]. For example, KLF4 is found to suppress cell proliferation through modulation of p21Waf1/Cip1 [13]. A variety of growth-suppressive signals activate KLF4, e.g. cell-contact inhibition, serum starvation, DNA damage, and cell differentiation [7–9]. These in vitro results suggest KLF4 may suppress cell proliferation rates in cancer cells, including HCC [14–17]. Nevertheless, the underlying mechanisms are not completely understood. We have previously shown that KLF4 binds to the promoter of Vitamin D receptor (VDR) to regulate its expression [18]. Moreover, the levels of KLF4 are reduced and the levels of VDR are increased in HCC cell lines and primary tumor samples [18]. Furthermore, expression of KLF4 in HCC cells sensitizes them to the anti-proliferative effects of VD3, possibly through regulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-associated events related to cell metastases and growth [18]. Here, we studied how KLF4 may regulate EMT events in HCC.

The role of microRNAs (miRNAs) in the carcinogenesis have been extensively studied previously, especially their involvement in regulation of EMT-associated proteins, Snail1, Slug, ZEB1 and ZEB2. For example, miR-200 family has been shown to inhibit ZEB1 and ZEB2 [19–23], miR-506 has been shown to block Slug translation [24–27], and miR-153 has been shown to suppress Snail1 and ZEB2 [28]. However, whether these miRNAs may be regulated by KLF4 has not been acknowledged.

Here, we examined the involvement of miRNAs in KLF4-suppressed EMT in HCC cells, and the underlying mechanisms.

RESULTS

KLF4 increases levels of miR-153, miR-506 and miR-200b in HCC cells

In order to evaluate the effects of KLF4 on the metastases of HCC cells, we overexpressed KLF4 or depleted KLF4 by shRNAs in two human HCC cell lines, HepG2 and Huh7. We found that expression of sh-KLF4 in both HCC lines significantly decreased the mRNA levels (Figure 1A), and protein levels of KLF4 (Figure 1B), while expression of KLF4 in both lines significantly increased the mRNA levels (Figure 1A), and protein levels of KLF4 (Figure 1B). Thus, these KLF4-modified HCC cell lines could be used to exam the KLF4 effects. We have previously reported that KLF4 suppressed the levels of EMT-related proteins, Snail1, Slug and ZEB1, in HCC cells. Here we aimed to figure out whether KLF4 may regulate the expression of these EMT-associated proteins through miRNAs. From all the miRNA candidates, we specifically found that KLF4 overexpression increased the levels of miR-153, miR-506 and miR-200b in both HCC cell lines, while KLF4 depletion decreased the levels of miR-153, miR-506 and miR-200b in both HCC cell lines (Figure 1C). Hence, these miRNAs were analyzed for their associations with EMT-proteins.

Figure 1. KLF4 increases levels of miR-153, miR-506 and miR-200b in HCC cells.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

We overexpressed KLF4 or depleted KLF4 by shRNAs in two human HCC cell lines, HepG2 and Huh7. A–B. KLF4-modifed cells were examined for KLF4 in both HCC lines at the mRNA levels (A), and at protein levels (B). and C. The levels of miR-153, miR-506 and miR-200b were shown in KLF4-modifed HCC cell lines. *p<0.05. N=5.

Targeting and inhibition of translation of Snail1 by miR-153, Slug by miR-506 and ZEB1 by miR-200b in HCC cells

By bioinformatics analyses, we found that miR-153 bound to 3′UTR of Snail1 mRNA at 440-448 base site (Figure 2A), miR-506 bound to 3′UTR of Slug mRNA at both 439-446 and 843-849 base sites (Figure 2B), and miR-200b bound to 3′UTR of ZEB1 mRNA at both 463-479 and 892-898 base sites (Figure 2C). In order to confirm that these specific bindings (miR-153/Snail1, miR-506/Slug, miR-200b/ZEB1) are functional, we either overexpressed miR-153, miR-506 and miR-200b, or inhibited miR-153, miR-506 and miR-200b in both HCC cell lines. These HCC cells were also transfected with a plasmid carrying a null sequence as a control. Co-expression of a GFP reporter in these plasmids allow purification of transfected cells by flow cytometry. The overexpression or inhibition of either miRNA in both HCC cell lines was confirmed by RT-qPCR (Figure 2D). The miR-153-modified HCC cells were then transfected with 1μg of Snail1-3′UTR luciferase-reporter plasmid. The luciferase activities were quantified in these cells, suggesting that miR-153 targets 3′UTR of Snail1 mRNA to inhibit its translation (Figure 2E). The miR-506-modified HCC cells were transfected with 1μg of Slug-3′UTR luciferase-reporter plasmid. The luciferase activities were quantified in these cells, suggesting that miR-506 targets 3′UTR of Slug mRNA to inhibit its translation (Figure 2E). Similarly, the miR-200b-modified HCC cells were then transfected with 1μg of ZEB1-3′UTR luciferase-reporter plasmid. The luciferase activities were quantified in these cells, suggesting that miR-200b targets 3′UTR of ZEB1 mRNA to inhibit its translation (Figure 2E).

Figure 2. Targeting inhibition of translation of Snail1 by miR-153, Slug by miR-506 and ZEB1 by miR-200b in HCC cells.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

A–C. By bioinformatics analyses, we found that miR-153 bound to 3′UTR of Snail1 mRNA at 440-448 base site (A), miR-506 bound to 3′UTR of Slug mRNA at both 439-446 and 843-849 base sites (B), and miR-200b bound to 3′UTR of ZEB1 mRNA at both 463-479 and 892-898 base sites (C) D. We either overexpressed miR-153, miR-506 and miR-200b, or inhibited miR-153, miR-506 and miR-200b in both HCC cell lines. These HCC cells were also transfected with a plasmid carrying a null sequence as a control (null). The overexpression or inhibition of these miRNAs in both HCC cell lines was confirmed by RT-qPCR. E. The miR-153-modified HCC cells were then transfected with 1μg of Snail1-3′UTR luciferase-reporter plasmid. The miR-506-modified HCC cells were transfected with 1μg of Slug-3′UTR luciferase-reporter plasmid. The miR-200b-modified HCC cells were transfected with 1μg of ZEB1-3′UTR luciferase-reporter plasmid. The luciferase activities were quantified in these cells. *p<0.05. N=5.

MiR-153, miR-506 and miR-200b overexpression inhibits HCC cell growth

Then we examined the effects of miR-153, miR-506 and miR-200b on HCC cell growth in an MTT assay. We found that overexpression of either miRNA in HCC cells significantly decreased cell growth, while depletion of either miRNA in HCC cells significantly increased cell growth, in both HepG2 cells (Figure 3A) and Huh7 cells (Figure 3B). Moreover, the effects of expression of all 3 miRNAs or all 3 as-miRNAs in HCC cells were significantly pronounced, compared to the effects of expression of either single miRNA or as-miRNA, respectively (Figure 3A–3B). These data suggest that miR-153, miR-506 and miR-200b overexpression inhibits HCC cell growth.

Figure 3. MiR-153, miR-506 and miR-200b overexpression inhibits HCC cell growth.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

A–B. The effects of modifications of miR-153, miR-506 and miR-200b on cell growth in an MTT assay, in both HepG2 cells (A) and Huh7 cells (B) *p<0.05. N=5.

MiR-153, miR-506 and miR-200b overexpression suppresses HCC cell invasion

Then we examined the effects of miR-153, miR-506 and miR-200b on HCC cell invasiveness in a transwell cell migration assay. We found that overexpression of either miRNA in HCC cells significantly decreased cell invasion, while depletion of either miRNA in HCC cells significantly increased cell invasion, in both HepG2 cells (Figure 4A) and Huh7 cells (Figure 4B). Moreover, the effects of expression of all 3 miRNAs or all 3 as-miRNAs in HCC cells were significantly pronounced, compared to the effects of expression of either single miRNA or as-miRNA, respectively (Figure 4A–4B). These data suggest that miR-153, miR-506 and miR-200b overexpression suppresses HCC cell invasion.

Figure 4. MiR-153, miR-506 and miR-200b overexpression suppresses HCC cell invasion.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

A–B. The effects of modifications of miR-153, miR-506 and miR-200b on cell invasiveness in a transwell cell migration assay, shown by the percentage of migrated cells in total cells, in either HepG2 cells (A), or Huh7 cells (B) *p<0.05. N=5.

MiR-153, miR-506 and miR-200b depletion abolishes the suppressive effects of KLF4 on HCC cell growth and invasion

In order to confirm that KLF4 may affect the HCC cell growth and invasion through miR-153, miR-506 and miR-200b, we overexpressed the antisense for miR-153, miR-506 and miR-200b in KLF4-expressing HepG2 cells (Figure 5A–5B), and compared to HepG2-KLF4 cells and HepG2-scr cells in both MTT and transwell cell migration assay. We found that miR-153, miR-506 and miR-200b depletion abolished the suppressive effects of KLF4 on HCC cell growth (Figure 6A) and invasion (Figure 6B), suggesting that KLF4 may inhibit the HCC cell growth and invasion through miR-153, miR-506 and miR-200b. Thus, this model is summarized in a schematic (Figure 7).

Figure 5. Preparation of miR-153, miR-506 and miR-200b overexpressing HepG2 cells.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

In order to confirm that KLF4 may affect the HCC cell growth and invasion through miR-153, miR-506 and miR-200b, we overexpressed the antisense for miR-153, miR-506 and miR-200b in KLF4-expressing HepG2 cells, and compared to HepG2-KLF4 cells and HepG2-scr cells. A–B. The levels of mRNA (A) and protein (B) of KLF4, Snail1, Slug and ZEB1. *p<0.05. NS: non-significant. N=5.

Figure 6. Depletion of miR-153, miR-506 and miR-200b abolishes the effects of KLF4 on HCC cell growth and invasion.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Depletion of miR-153, miR-506 and miR-200b abolished the effects of KLF4 on HCC cell growth in an MTT assay. A. and invasion in a transwell cell migration assay B. *p<0.05. N=5.

Figure 7. Schematic of the model.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

KLF4 may suppress the HCC cell growth and invasion through miR-153, miR-506 and miR-200b-mediated suppression of Snail1, Slug and ZEB1, respectively.

DISCUSSION

Many miRNAs affect the growth and metastasis of HCC cells. Therefore, understanding of the aberrant expression of miRNAs in HCC cells may help to clarify the mechanisms underlying HCC metastasis and thus to improve therapy.

EMT enhances the carcinogenesis of HCC, for example, Sun et al. reported that stemness factor Sox2 correlates with metastasis and low survival rate in HCC, possibly through regulation of Slug transcription [29]. Previous studies have shown that EMT-associated proteins are regulated by miRNAs in HCC [30, 31]. For example, miR-200 family has been shown to inhibit ZEB1 and ZEB2 [19–23]. Moreover, Dhayat et al. reported that miR-200a and miR-200b were significantly downregulated in HCC, and could be served as an early marker for cirrhosis-associated HCC [32]. Wong et al. showed that miR-200b negatively regulated Rho/ROCK signaling pathway to suppress metastases of HCC [33]. Further, miR-506 has been shown to block Slug translation [24–27], and miR-153 has been shown to suppress Snail1 and ZEB2 [28]. A pioneer study has shown that expression of KLF4 in HCC cells sensitizes them to the anti-proliferative effects of VD3, possibly through regulation of EMT-associated events related to cell metastases and growth [18]. However, whether KLF4 may control EMT-associated proteins through miRNAs is unknown.

We have previously shown that the reduced levels of KLF4 in HCC correlate with increased levels of EMT-associated proteins, e.g. Snail1, Slug and ZEB1. The augment of these proteins is responsible for not only cancer invasion, but also allow the outgrowth of the tumor [18]. Moreover, in our previous work, we found that the suppression of KLF4 on EMT-associated factors Snail1, Slug and ZEB1 were more pronounced at protein levels, compared to mRNA levels, which suggests presence of post-transcriptional controls. Hence, in this study, we hypothesized that KLF4 may inhibit these EMT-associated proteins through modulation of miRNAs, which regulate gene expression at post-transcriptional level. Three miRNAs (miR-153, miR-506 and miR-200b) that target 3′-UTR of Snail1, Slug and ZEB1 mRNAs, respectively, were found to be induced by KLF4 overexpression, and suppressed by KLF4 depletion, in HCC cells. To further confirm that the bindings between these miRNAs and EMT-associated proteins are functional, we performed promoter luciferase assay. Moreover, expression of either miRNA significantly inhibited HCC cell growth and invasiveness, while the effect of combined expression of all 3 miRNAs was more pronounced. In a loss-of-function experiment, we suppressed the levels of miR-153, miR-506 and miR-200b in KLF4-overexpressing HCC cells, which completely abolished the effects of KLF4 on cell growth and invasion.

Since we have used 2 HCC cell lines and got essentially similar results independently, a possibility of these results to be cell-line-dependent is unlikely. Since our data were basically achieved from HCC cell lines, in future, examination of primary HCC specimen may be applied. Also, the analyses on the EMT-associated proteins were not complete, since some proteins like ZEB2, E-cadherin may be also examined in future studies. Further, the in vivo studies should be applied to confirm these in vitro findings.

Together, the findings in the current study highlight a suppressive role of KLF4 in regulation of EMT-enhanced tumor growth and invasion in HCC cells, and suggest that enhancement of either KLF4 or its downstream miRNAs may substantially improve the current treatment for HCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Experimental protocol approval

All experimental protocols were approved by the Research Bureau of Department of Oncology, Shanghai First People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University.

HCC cell lines

HepG2 and Huh7 are two human HCC cell lines, which were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD, USA), and cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented with 15% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) in a humidified chamber with 5% CO2 at 37°C.

Cell transfection

The coding sequence of human KLF4 was amplified using cDNA of human embryonic stem cells as a template, and cloned into pLVX-ZsGreen1-C1 vector (Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA). The short hairpin small interfering RNA (shRNA) for KLF4 has been described before [18]. A scramble sequence was used as the mock control (scr). Human KLF4 target sequence: 5′-GCCAGAAAGCACTACAATC-3′; scr sequence: 5′-CTGCGATGCGCGTTCCGCTTA-3′. The sequences encoding miR-153, antisense (as)-miR-153, miR-506, as-miR-506, miR-200b, or as-miR-200b were similarly cloned into pLVX-ZsGreen1-C1 vector. The antisense sequences were single-stranded RNAs of complementary sequence to a specific miRNA. To control the infections with miRNAs, a null plasmid was prepared (null). In the current study, we did not detect the effects of scr or null on our results, compared to untreated cells. Thus, only data from scr- or null-treated cells were shown. Transfection with either KLF4, scr, shKLF4, miR-153, as-miR-153, null, miR-506, as-miR-506, miR-200b, or as-miR-200b-expressing plasmids was performed with Lipofectamine-2000 (Invitrogen). The success of transfection (nearly 100%) was assured by GFP expression of the transfected cells.

MTT assay

For assay of cell viability, cells were seeded into 24 well-plate at 10000 cells per well and subjected to a Cell Proliferation Kit (MTT, Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA), according to the instruction of the manufacturer. The MTT assay is a colorimetric assay for assessing viable cell number, taking advantage that NADPH-dependent cellular oxidoreductase enzymes in viable cells reduce the tetrazolium dye 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) to its insoluble formazan in purple readily being quantified by absorbance value (OD) at 570 nm. Experiments were performed 5 times.

Transwell cell migration assay

Cells (104) were plated into the top side of polycarbonate transwell filter coated with Matrigel in the upper chamber of the BioCoatTM Invasion Chambers (Becton-Dickinson Biosciences, Bedford, MA, USA) and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. The cells inside the upper chamber with cotton swabs were then removed. Migratory and invasive cells on both the upper chamber and the lower membrane surface were fixed, stained with hematoxylin, and counted for 10 random 100X fields per well. Cell counts are expressed as the cell number in the lower membrane per total cell number (cells in both upper chamber and lower membrane). Five independent experiments were performed and the data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD).

Western blot

Protein was extracted from the cultured cells with RIPA lysis buffer (1% NP40, 0.1% Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 100μg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, in PBS) on ice. The supernatants were collected after centrifugation at 12000×g at 4°C for 20min. Protein concentration was determined using a BCA protein assay kit (Bio-rad, Shanghai, China), and whole lysates were mixed with 4×SDS loading buffer (125mmol/l Tris-HCl, 4% SDS, 20% glycerol, 100mmol/l Dithiothreitol (DTT), and 0.2% bromophenol blue) at a ratio of 1:3. Samples were heated at 100°C for 5 min and were separated on SDS-polyacrylamide gels. The separated proteins were then transferred to a PVDF membrane. The membrane blots were first probed with a primary antibody. After incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated second antibody, autoradiograms were prepared using the enhanced chemiluminescent system to visualize the protein antigen. The signals were recorded using X-ray film. Primary antibodies were rabbit anti-KLF4, anti-Snail1, anti-Slug, anti-ZEB1 and anti-β-actin (Cell Signaling, San Jose, CA, USA). Secondary antibody was HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit (Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs, West Grove, PA, USA). β-actin was used as a protein loading control. The protein levels were first normalized to β-actin, and then normalized to the control.

Quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR)

Total RNA or miRNAs were extracted from cultured cells with miRNeasy mini kit or RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), respectively. Complementary DNA (cDNA) was randomly primed from 2μg of total RNA using the Omniscript reverse transcription kit (Qiagen). Quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) was subsequently performed in triplicate with a 1:4 dilution of cDNA using the Quantitect SyBr green PCR system (Qiagen) on a Rotorgene 6000 series PCR machine. All primers were purchased from Qiagen. Data were collected and analyzed using 2-ΔΔCt method for quantification of the relative mRNA expression levels. Values of genes were first normalized against β-actin, and then compared to the control.

Luciferase-reporter activity assay

Luciferase-reporters were successfully constructed using molecular cloning technology. Target sequence was inserted into pGL3-Basic vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) to obtain pGL3-Snail1-3′UTR, pGL3-Slug-3′UTR or pGL3-ZEB1-3′UTR, which contain the miR-153, miR-506 or miR-200b binding sequence, respectively. MiRNA-modified HCC cells were seeded in 24-well plates for 24 hours, after which they were transfected with 1μg of Luciferase-reporter plasmids per well using PEI Transfection Reagent. Then luciferase activities were measured using the dual-luciferase reporter gene assay kit (Promega), according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were carried out using the SPSS 18.0 statistical software package. All data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA with a Bonferroni correction, followed by Fisher's exact test. All values are depicted as mean ± standard deviation from 5 individuals and are considered significant if p < 0.05.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by Natural Science Foundation of China grant 81272714 and 81572310 (to QL), and Shanghai Pujiang Programe 13PJD025 (to QL).

Footnotes

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Ge Z, Zhang B, Bu X, Wang Y, Xiang L, Tan J. Molecular mechanism of activating protein-4 regulated growth of hepatocellular carcinoma. Tumour Biol. 2014;35:12441–12447. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-2562-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sun R, Luo Y, Li J, Wang Q, Li J, Chen X, Guan K, Yu Z. Ammonium chloride inhibits autophagy of hepatocellular carcinoma cells through SMAD2 signaling. Tumour Biol. 2015;36:1173–1177. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-2699-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wang J, Su H, Han X, Xu K. Inhibition of fibroblast growth factor receptor signaling impairs metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Tumour Biol. 2014;35:11005–11011. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-2384-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wang L, Yao M, Dong Z, Zhang Y, Yao D. Circulating specific biomarkers in diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma and its metastasis monitoring. Tumour Biol. 2014;35:9–20. doi: 10.1007/s13277-013-1141-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wang H, Chen L. Tumor microenviroment and hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;28(Suppl 1):43–48. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Han MS, Moon KS, Lee KH, Cho SB, Lim SH, Jang WY, Jung TY, Kim IY, Jung S. Brain metastasis from hepatocellular carcinoma: the role of surgery as a prognostic factor. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:567. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kanai M, Wei D, Li Q, Jia Z, Ajani J, Le X, Yao J, Xie K. Loss of Kruppel-like factor 4 expression contributes to Sp1 overexpression and human gastric cancer development and progression. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:6395–6402. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wei D, Gong W, Kanai M, Schlunk C, Wang L, Yao JC, Wu TT, Huang S, Xie K. Drastic down-regulation of Kruppel-like factor 4 expression is critical in human gastric cancer development and progression. Cancer Res. 2005;65:2746–2754. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Katz JP, Perreault N, Goldstein BG, Actman L, McNally SR, Silberg DG, Furth EE, Kaestner KH. Loss of Klf4 in mice causes altered proliferation and differentiation and precancerous changes in the adult stomach. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:935–945. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.02.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Govindaraju S, Lee BS. Kruppel -like factor 8 is a stress-responsive transcription factor that regulates expression of HuR. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2014;34:519–532. doi: 10.1159/000363019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Li Q, Dong Z, Zhou F, Cai X, Gao Y, Wang LW. Kruppel-like factor 5 promotes lung tumorigenesis through upregulation of Sox4. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2014;33:1–10. doi: 10.1159/000356645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell. 2006;126:663–676. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhang W, Geiman DE, Shields JM, Dang DT, Mahatan CS, Kaestner KH, Biggs JR, Kraft AS, Yang VW. The gut-enriched Kruppel-like factor (Kruppel-like factor 4) mediates the transactivating effect of p53 on the p21WAF1/Cip1 promoter. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:18391–18398. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C000062200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sung MT, Hsu HT, Lee CC, Lee HC, Kuo YJ, Hua K, Hsia CY, Chi CW. Kruppel-like factor 4 modulates the migration and invasion of hepatoma cells by suppressing TIMP-1 and TIMP-2. Oncol Rep. 2015;34:439–446. doi: 10.3892/or.2015.3964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hsu HT, Wu PR, Chen CJ, Hsu LS, Yeh CM, Hsing MT, Chiang YS, Lai MT, Yeh KT. High cytoplasmic expression of Kruppel-like factor 4 is an independent prognostic factor of better survival in hepatocellular carcinoma. International journal of molecular sciences. 2014;15:9894–9906. doi: 10.3390/ijms15069894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lin ZS, Chu HC, Yen YC, Lewis BC, Chen YW. Kruppel-like factor 4, a tumor suppressor in hepatocellular carcinoma cells reverts epithelial mesenchymal transition by suppressing slug expression. PLoS One. 2012;7:e43593. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Noti JD, Johnson AK, Dillon JD. The leukocyte integrin gene CD11d is repressed by gut-enriched Kruppel-like factor 4 in myeloid cells. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:3449–3457. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M412627200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Li Q, Gao Y, Jia Z, Mishra L, Guo K, Li Z, Le X, Wei D, Huang S, Xie K. Dysregulated Kruppel-like factor 4 and vitamin D receptor signaling contribute to progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:799–810. e791–792. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.05.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gregory PA, Bert AG, Paterson EL, Barry SC, Tsykin A, Farshid G, Vadas MA, Khew-Goodall Y, Goodall GJ. The miR-200 family and miR-205 regulate epithelial to mesenchymal transition by targeting ZEB1 and SIP1. Nat Cell Biol. 2008;10:593–601. doi: 10.1038/ncb1722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Park SM, Gaur AB, Lengyel E, Peter ME. The miR-200 family determines the epithelial phenotype of cancer cells by targeting the E-cadherin repressors ZEB1 and ZEB2. Genes Dev. 2008;22:894–907. doi: 10.1101/gad.1640608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Korpal M, Lee ES, Hu G, Kang Y. The miR-200 family inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer cell migration by direct targeting of E-cadherin transcriptional repressors ZEB1 and ZEB2. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:14910–14914. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C800074200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Burk U, Schubert J, Wellner U, Schmalhofer O, Vincan E, Spaderna S, Brabletz T. A reciprocal repression between ZEB1 and members of the miR-200 family promotes EMT and invasion in cancer cells. EMBO Rep. 2008;9:582–589. doi: 10.1038/embor.2008.74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Xiao Y, Wang J, Yan W, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Zhou K, Wen J, Wang Y, Cai W. Dysregulated miR-124 and miR-200 expression contribute to cholangiocyte proliferation in the cholestatic liver by targeting IL-6/STAT3 signalling. J Hepatol. 2015;62:889–896. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.10.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sun Y, Mezzanzanica D, Zhang W. MiR-506: A Multitasker in Suppression of the Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition. RNA Dis. 2014;1:e447. doi: 10.14800/rd.447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Winkelman C. Inactivity and inflammation: selected cytokines as biologic mediators in muscle dysfunction during critical illness. AACN clinical issues. 2004;15:74–82. doi: 10.1097/00044067-200401000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sun Y, Hu L, Zheng H, Bagnoli M, Guo Y, Rupaimoole R, Rodriguez-Aguayo C, Lopez-Berestein G, Ji P, Chen K, Sood AK, Mezzanzanica D, Liu J, Sun B, Zhang W. MiR-506 inhibits multiple targets in the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition network and is associated with good prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer. J Pathol. 2015;235:25–36. doi: 10.1002/path.4443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sun D, Sun B, Liu T, Zhao X, Che N, Gu Q, Dong X, Yao Z, Li R, Li J, Chi J, Sun R. Slug promoted vasculogenic mimicry in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cell Mol Med. 2013;17:1038–1047. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Xu Q, Sun Q, Zhang J, Yu J, Chen W, Zhang Z. Downregulation of miR-153 contributes to epithelial-mesenchymal transition and tumor metastasis in human epithelial cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2013;34:539–549. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgs374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sun C, Sun L, Li Y, Kang X, Zhang S, Liu Y. Sox2 expression predicts poor survival of hepatocellular carcinoma patients and it promotes liver cancer cell invasion by activating Slug. Med Oncol. 2013;30:503. doi: 10.1007/s12032-013-0503-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Qiu G, Lin Y, Zhang H, Wu D. miR-139-5p inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition, migration and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma cells by targeting ZEB1 and ZEB2. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015;463:315–321. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.05.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhao S, Zhang Y, Zheng X, Tu X, Li H, Chen J, Zang Y, Zhang J. Loss of MicroRNA-101 Promotes Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition in Hepatocytes. J Cell Physiol. 2015;230:2706–2717. doi: 10.1002/jcp.24995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Dhayat SA, Mardin WA, Kohler G, Bahde R, Vowinkel T, Wolters H, Senninger N, Haier J, Mees ST. The microRNA-200 family--a potential diagnostic marker in hepatocellular carcinoma? J Surg Oncol. 2014;110:430–438. doi: 10.1002/jso.23668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wong CM, Wei L, Au SL, Fan DN, Zhou Y, Tsang FH, Law CT, Lee JM, He X, Shi J, Wong CC, Ng IO. MiR-200b/200c/429 subfamily negatively regulates Rho/ROCK signaling pathway to suppress hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis. Oncotarget. 2015;6:13658–13670. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Oncotarget are provided here courtesy of Impact Journals, LLC

RESOURCES