Skip to main content
Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases logoLink to Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases
. 2016 Jul;8(3):206–211. doi: 10.15171/mejdd.2016.33

Association between Pattern of Gastritis and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Patients with Helicobacter Pylori Infection

Hossein Nobakht 1,2, Amirhossein Boghratian 1,5, Masoudreza Sohrabi 1, Mohammad Panahian 1, Naser Rakhshani 1, Mehdi Nikkhah 1, Hossein Ajdarkosh 1, Gholamreza Hemmasi 1, Mahmoodreza Khonsari 1, Ali Gholami 3,4, Neda Rabiei 1, Farhad Zamani 1,*
PMCID: PMC5045673  PMID: 27698970

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reflux disease is a common gastrointestinal problem. The association between reflux disease and gastritis pattern is controversial. AIM: To determine the association between reflux disease and gastritis pattern in patients with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection.

METHODS

470 patients with dyspepsia and reflux disease were enrolled in this study. The inclusion criteria were willing to participate in the study, age over 40 years, and having the criteria of ROME III for at least 3 months. Patients with history of H. pylori eradication therapy during the 3 months before the study, a history of gastric surgery, and gastric cancer were excluded. All of the participants underwent upper endoscopy and two biopsy samples were taken from antrum, body, and fundal areas.

RESULTS

H. pylori infection rate was 367 (78.1%) with mean age of 59.8 ± 11.4 years. Of them 131 patients (35.7%) were male. Reflux disease was detected in 273 (74.4%) patients. 216 (58.9%) and 102 (27.8%) patients had non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), respectively. Corpus predominant and antral predominant gastritis were seen in 72 (19.6%) and 129 (35.2%) patients, respectively. Antral gastritis was significantly associated with GERD (p<0.01). In regression analysis, antral predominant gastritis had a significant association with GERD (OR=1.92; 95%CI: 1.22- 3.12). The same result was observed in mild to moderate antral and greater curvature gastritis (OR= 1.26; 95%CI: 0.25-6.40 and OR= 3.0; 95%CI: 0.63-14.17, respectively).

CONCLUSION

According to these finding ,we could suggest that the pattern of gastritis could be associated with reflux disease and GERD.

Keywords: Gastroesophageal Reflux, GERD, Gastritis, Esophagus

INTRODUCTION

Reflux disease is considered as a common cause of referring patients to medical care.1 Risk factors for reflux esophagitis include the presence of hiatal hernia, transient relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter, and impaired clearance of regurgitated gastric contents in the esophagus.2 Despite these facts, the underlying mechanism of reflux disease has not been completely defined.3 It was suggested that Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) could be a causative factor for many gastrointestinal diseases such as gastritis. Nevertheless, the relationship between H. pylori infection and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is still controversial.4-6

During the last decades H. pylori treatment was commonly administered to patients with dyspepsia. In this context, studies on patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia showed that H. pylori eradication might not have a beneficial role for patients with reflux disease.5,7 Even some researchers suggested that presence of H. pylori infection might have a protective role against GERD.8 Although it is not confirmed in all studies.9 Thus the association between H. pylori, gastritis, and GERD is considered as a topic of interest in studies. Based on previous studies chronic active H. pylori gastritis is associated with milder forms of reflux disease and eradication of H. pylori increased the risk of developing GERD.5,9 Moreover there is little information about the pattern of gastritis in dyspeptic patients with developing GERD. The aim of this study was to determine the association between the presence of GERD and gastritis patterns in patients with H. pylori infection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients:

This is a cross-sectional study on patients with dyspepsia and reflux disease referring to gastrointestinal clinics of Firoozgar General Hospital between 2010 and 2013. The inclusion criteria were willing to participate in the study, age over 40 years, and having the criteria of ROME III for at least 3 months. The exclusion criteria were H. pylori eradication therapy during the last 3 months before the study, and a history of gastric surgery or gastric cancer.

The study’s protocol was explained to all volunteers. The participants underwent physical examination by three trained general practitioners. Also a questionnaire including demographic as well as clinical findings, smoking habits, and alcohol use was completed for each subject. In the case of any important findings they were referred to a relevant specialist. Consequently the participants were invited for upper endoscopy in the Endoscopy ward of the hospital. Reflux disease was defined as the presence of reflux symptoms (heartburn and regurgitation) at least twice weekly for at least 4 weeks or the presence of mucosal break in esophagus according to Los Angeles (LA) classification during endoscopy.10

Endoscopy

Upper endoscopy was performed by two mentor gastroenterologists in our center where more than 3000 upper endoscopies are annually performed. The patients were advised to discontinue any proton pomp inhibitor and antibiotics at least one month prior to endoscopy. After explaining the procedure to the patients, local oropharynx anesthesia with lidocaine 5% and midazolam were applied by a trained nurse. The endoscope was advanced to the second part of duodenum. The distal of esophagus as well as stomach was evaluated carefully and any erythema, erosion, and ulcer were reported. Endoscopic reflux was defined as the presence of either erosions or ulceration. GERD was classified according to LA classification. Two biopsy samples were taken from antrum (2–3 cm from the pylorus), body, and fundal areas. Two antral biopsy samples were also taken for H. pylori rapid urease test (CLOtest; Ballard, Draper, Utah, USA). Presence of H. pylori was identified when rapid urease test or histology was positive. During endoscopy all lesions including erythema, erosions (small superficial defect in mucosa with petechia), atrophies (whitish and thinning mucosa with or without submucosal vascular pattern), ulcer, and tumoral lesions were noted and biopsy samples were taken. The samples were stored in separate bottles.

Histological Evaluation:

The biopsy specimens were embedded in paraffin wax, then sectioned and stained with Hematoxylin-Eosin (H&E) and Giemsa. All the specimens were examined by an experienced gastrointestinal pathologist. According to Sydney System the severity and depth of inflammation were graded as 0-311. Chronic inflammation was considered as the presence of inflammatory cells in lamina propria. Chronic active inflammation was considered as the presence of granulocyte in lamina propria or intraepithelial. The presence of H. pylori in any specimens was considered as positive H. pylori.

Data collection:

The clinical data as well as upper endoscopic results were recorded in each questionnaire. The histopathological data were also collected from pathology reports.

Statistical Analysis:

The results were analyzed by SPSS (version 20.0 SPSS, Chicago, Illinois USA) software for Windows. Descriptive analysis was used for reporting the prevalence of lesions, sex, and age distributions. The association between clinical and endoscopic data and pathology findings were analyzed by chi-square test. Forward stepwise multivariate logistic regression was also applied for final estimations. P value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Ethics:

The Ethics Committee of Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease Research Center approved the study protocol. The protocol was explained to subjects before enrollment. A written informed consent was obtained from all the participants. Patients’ information was securely stored in the study database.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics:

Of the all patients with dyspepsia, 470 patients met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. The mean age of the participants was 58.3±11.6 years and 241 (51.2%) of them were male. (Table 1) show the basic characteristics of the patients.

Table 1 . The demographic characteristics of the patients.

Variables N (%)
Sex Man 241 (51.2%)
Woman 229 (48.8%)
Job Housewives 147 (31.3%)
Employees 122 (26.0%)
Farmers 84 (17.9%)
Other 117 (24.9%)
Educational level Illiterate 30 (6.4%)
Primary education 130 (27.7%)
Third grade 150 (31.9%)
Secondary
High school or
diploma
117 (24.9%)
College education 43 (9.1%)
Location Urban 335 (71.3%)
Rural 135 (28.7%)
History of smoking Yes 158 (33.6%)
No 312 (66.4)
Mean duration of smoking 11.4± 18.8
Body mass index (BMI) 26.14 ± 4.46

Endoscopic and Histological Findings:

Regarding the endoscopic findings, 19 (4%) patients had normal upper endoscopy. Sliding hiatal hernia was seen in 195 (41.5%). Endoscopic GERD was found in 136 (28.9%) patients, of whom 90 (66.2%), 40 (29.4%), 3 (2.2%), and 3 (2.2%) patients had grade A, B, C, and D of esophagitis according to LA classification, respectively. The frequency of endoscopic finding is summarized in table 2.

Table 2 . The frequency of endoscopic findings in association with H. pylori (N=470) .

HP status p value
Hiatal hernia Present 152 43 0.81
Absent 215 59
Endoscopic GERD
(Los Angeles Class)
None 265 70 0.31
A 67 23
B 32 8
C 2 1
D 1 2
Gastritis Corpus predominant Present 72 24 0.41
Absent 295 79
Antral predominant Present 129 18 0.13
Absent 238 75
Equal gastritis Present 196 59 0.49
Absent 171 44

H. pylori infection was detected in 367 (78.1%) subjects with mean age of 59.8± 11.4 years and of whom 131 (35.7%) patients were male. Positive H. pylori infection was detected in 202 (78%), 219 (77.6%) and 197 (79.7%) patients with bloating, pyrosis, and heart burn respectively. Among H.pylori positive patients reflux disease was seen in 273 (74.4%) subjects. In this group 216 (58.9%) and 102 (27.8%) patients had non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) and GERD respectively. H. pylori was also detected in 17(65.3%) out of 26 patients with columnar lined esophagus (Barrett’s). Presence of H. pylori was revealed among 72 (75.0%) out of 96 and 129 (92.1%) out of 140 patients with corpus predominant and antral predominant gastritis, respectively. The association between the frequencies of endoscopic findings and the presence of H. pylori is summarized in table 2.

In the next step we excluded the H. pylori negative patients and the rest of analysis was done on H. pylori infected cases. In chi-square analysis we did not find any association between the presence of H. pylori and reflux disease (p =0.52) as well as GERD (p=0.25). Patients with GERD had symptoms of reflux disease (p <0.001). The antral gastritis was significantly associated with GERD (p <0.001) . We could not obtain the same result for corpus predominant gastritis (p =0.10). In general the severity of antral gastritis was associated with reflux disease (p =0.04). This associations was not shown in patients with GERD (p =0.07). The severity of gastritis in other parts of stomach was not associated with reflux disease or GERD. There was not any significant association between antral, cardia, or corpus atrophy and GERD. We did not find any association between atrophy of any zones of the stomach with reflux disease.

In regression analysis, antral predominant gastritis had a significant association with GERD (OR=1.92; 95%CI: 1.22-3.12) but not NERD. Moreover grade B of GERD had a significant correlation with antral predominant gastritis (OR=3.26; 95%CI: 1.53–3.19). The same result was observed in mild to moderate antral great curvature gastritis (OR=1.26; 95%CI: 0.25–6.40 and OR= 3.0; 95%CI: 0.63–14.17, respectively). We did not observe a significant association between GERD and other variables in this context. The presence of NERD was not associated with the grade of GERD.

DISCUSSION

In the present study, we found that the prevalence of H. pylori among patients with reflux disease and GERD were 74.4% and 75.3%, respectively. Moreover we showed that the severity of antral gastritis was associated with reflux disease.

H. pylori could contribute to many gastrointestinal diseases including GERD. The role of H. pylori in developing GERD still remains a controversial issue.9,10 Based on previous reports, the rate of H. pylori infection in patients with GERD, wildly varies from 30-90% and it seems that about 40% of patients with GERD are infected by this bacterium.5,11 Furthermore, most trials on the correlation between H. pylori infection and GERD have indicated no causal relationship.1,9,12,13 Acid contact to esophagus mucosa is considered as the main cause of esophagitis.2,5,15 H. pylori itself produces acid inhibitory proteins, while the infection induces inhibition of acid secretion. In some patients H. pylori is primarily colonized in the antrum, resulting in an antral predominant gastritis, which in turn induces gastrin and acid secretion. In the rest of patients H. pylori infection spreads from the antrum towards other parts of the stomach. 5,16,17 When the corpus (as the main acid–producing region) is infected, the secretion of acid is affected by inflammation process and decreases. In this view of point the eradication of H. pylori might increase acid secretion and consequently induce esophagitis as revealed by previous reports.

It has to be reminded that our country is considered as a high prevalence area of H. pylori infection, which in turn it is not easy to exclude H. pylori factors in evaluation of patients with reflux disease. The strength point of the present study is that it focused on H. pylori positive patients and evaluated the pattern of gastritis on reflux disease. Many of previous studies evaluated the correlation between carditis and GERD18-20, but in the present study we tried to determine the association between reflux disease and gastritis in each part of the stomach. This study showed a correlation between antral predominant gastritis and GERD in bivariate and regression analysis, which is not comparable with the result of previous reports. Also in previous reports it was already indicated that corpus predominant gastritis in H. pylori infected patients might have negative effect on gastric acid secretion via cytokines.18,21 Furthermore, we did not obtain the same association between other parts of the stomach and GERD, which was similar to other studies. In this study corpus gastritis was found less frequently in patients with reflux disease.

In conclusion, this study is one of the few studies focused on the relationship between GERD and pattern of gastritis in H. pylori infected patients. We found that pattern of gastritis could be associated with GERD.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The author declares no conflict of interest related to this work.

Please cite this paper as:

Nobakht H, Boghratian AH, Sohrabi MR, Panahian M, Rakhshani N, Nikkhah M, Ajdarkosh H, Gholami A , Hemmasi GR, Khonsari MR, Rabiei N, Zamani F. Association between Pattern of Gastritis and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Patients with Helicobacter Pylori Infection. Middle East J Dig Dis 2016;8:206-211. DOI: 10.15171/mejdd.2016.22

References

  • 1.Ashktorab H, Entezari O, Nouraie M, Dowlati E, Frederick W, Woods A. et al. Helicobacter pylori protection against reflux esophagitis. Dig Dis Sci. 2012;57:2924–8. doi: 10.1007/s10620-012-2349-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kim SW, Lee JH, Sim YS, Ryu YJ, Chang JH. Prevalence and risk factors for reflux esophagitis in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Korean J Intern Med. 2014;29:466–73. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2014.29.4.466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lee SW, Lee TY, Lien HC, Yang SS, Yeh HZ, Chang CS. Characteristics of symptom presentation and risk factors in patients with erosive esophagitis and nonerosive reflux disease. Med Princ Pract. 2014;23:460–4. doi: 10.1159/000363661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hussein NR, Napaki SM, Atherton JC. A study of Helicobacter pylori-associated gastritis patterns in Iraq and their association with strain virulence. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:125–7. doi: 10.4103/1319-3767.48971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vakil N, Talley NJ, Stolte M, Sundin M, Junghard O, Bolling-Sternevald E. Patterns of gastritis and the effect of eradicating Helicobacter pylori on gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in Western patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;24:55–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02964.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Grande M, Cadeddu F, Villa M, Attinà GM, Muzi MG, Nigro C. et al. Helicobacter pylori and gastroesophageal reflux disease. World J Surg Oncol. 2008;6:74. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-6-74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kandulski A, Malfertheiner P. Helicobacter pylori and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2014;30:402–7. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ford AC, Qume M, Moayyedi P, Arents NL, Lassen AT, Logan RF. et al. Helicobacter pylori “test and treat” or endoscopy for managing dyspepsia: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:1838–44. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yaghoobi M, Farrokhyar F, Yuan Y, Hunt RH. Is there an increased risk of GERD after Helicobacter pylori eradication?: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:1007–13. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Genta RM, Spechler SJ, Kielhorn AF. The Los Angeles and Savary-Miller systems for grading esophagitis: utilization and correlation with histology. Dis Esophagus. 2011;24:10–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2010.01092.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Stolte M, Meining A. The updated Sydney system: classification and grading of gastritis as the basis of diagnosis and treatment. Can J Gastroenterol. 2001;15:591–8. doi: 10.1155/2001/367832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pasechnikov VD, Chotchaeva AR, Pasechnikov DV. [Effect of HP eradication on the development of gastroesophageal reflux disease: results of the prospective study] Eksp Klin Gastroenterol. 2011;3:105–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Saad AM, Choudhary A, Bechtold ML. Effect of Helicobacter pylori treatment on gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012;47:129–35. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2011.648955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sharma P, Vakil N. Review article: Helicobacter pylori and reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;17:297–305. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01428.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Samsom M, Verhagen MA, vanBerge Henegouwen GP, Smout AJ. Abnormal clearance of exogenous acid and increased acid sensitivity of the proximal duodenum in dyspeptic patients. Gastroenterology. 1999;116:515–20. doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(99)70171-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mukaisho K, Hagiwara T, Nakayama T, Hattori T, Sugihara H. Potential mechanism of corpus-predominant gastritis after PPI therapy in Helicobacter pylori-positive patients with GERD. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:11962–5. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i34.11962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Moayyedi P, Wason C, Peacock R, Walan A, Bardhan K, Axon AT. et al. Changing patterns of Helicobacter pylori gastritis in long-standing acid suppression. Helicobacter. 2000;5:206–14. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-5378.2000.00032.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Miao Q, Ma YZ, Cai GH, Chen XY. Etiology and morphology of carditis: experiences from a single center in China. J Dig Dis. 2014;15:71–7. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kandulski A, Wex T, Kuester D, Mönkemüller K, Peitz U, Roessner A. et al. Chronic mucosal inflammation of the gastric cardia in gastroesophageal reflux disease is not regulated by FOXP3-expressing T cells. Dig Dis Sci. 2009;54:1940–6. doi: 10.1007/s10620-009-0746-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chandrasoma P. Carditis is esophageal and caused by GERD; it is not gastric. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32:341–2. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31811fa98a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Villani L, Trespi E, Fiocca R, Broglia F, Colla C, Luinetti O. et al. Analysis of gastroduodenitis and oesophagitis in relation to dyspeptic/reflux symptoms. Digestion. 1998;59:91–101. doi: 10.1159/000007473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases are provided here courtesy of Iranian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

RESOURCES