Abstract
Pancreatic stent proximal migration is a well known complication of pancreatic duct stenting, which occurs in about 5-6% of cases. Serious complications should be avoided by retrieval of the stent via different endoscopic techniques. We report a new technique previously reported only once (in a pancreatic duct with underlying pathology), to remove the proximally migrated pancreatic stent in a normal pancreatic duct by SpyGlass Direct Visualization System (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts, USA) and SpyBite Forceps (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts, USA)
Keywords: Pancreatic stent, ERCP, Cholangioscopy
INTRODUCTION
Pancreatic stent proximal migration is a well known complication of pancreatic duct stenting, which occurs in about 5-6% of cases.1 Risk factors for pancreatic stent migration are not well identified but stent placement for a long period and frequently exchanged stents should be done with more caution.2 Serious complications of a left in place migrated stent such as pancreatitis and pancreatic abscess 1,3 should be avoided by retrieval of the stent via different endoscopic techniques including forceps and snare grasping, balloon extraction, basket grasping, and wire cannulation with insertion of another larger diameter stent over the migrated stent and removing both.4,5 Endoscopic retrieval techniques have a success rate of 87%.6
We report a new technique previously reported only once, to remove the proximally migrated pancreatic stent by SpyGlass Direct Visualization System (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts, USA) and SpyBite Forceps (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts, USA).7
CASE REPORT
A 65-year-old woman presented with common biliary duct stones, normal pancreatic duct, and no history of pancreatic disease. In the first endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with Model TJF-Q180V Duodenoscopes (Olympus Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), due to twice experiencing unwanted pancreatic duct guide wire cannulation, a 5-Fr, 7cm simple flanged Teflon-coated pancreatic stent (ENDO-FLEX GmbH, Germany) was inserted to minimize the risk of post procedure pancreatitis. The procedure was continued and the stones were retracted successfully (figure 1). One week later in a second ERCP to remove the pancreatic stent, it was found that the stent had migrated deeply into the proximal part of the pancreatic duct. Several attempts to retrieve the stent by forceps, snare, and balloon extraction failed. So after insertion of 0.025 mm guide wire, SpyGlass cholangioscopy system (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts, USA) was used (figure 2). The SpyScope has the advantage of 4-way tip deflection steering system, which provides excellent facilitated maneuverability in the small ducts and we could visualize the distal end of the stent. The distal end of the stent was grasped by SpyBite forceps (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts, USA) and the stent was retrieved safely. The patient was admitted to hospital for 24 hours to closely be monitored for early signs of pancreatitis and then discharged. The duration of procedure was 3 hours. Initial attempts with snare, basket, and balloon took about 1.5 hours and 1.5 hours were spent on final attempts with SpyGlass Direct Visualization System.
Fig.1 .

ERCP demonstrated the pancreatic duct stent (arrow) and common biliary duct stones (arrow head)
Fig.2 .

Spyscope (empty arrow) inserted in the pancreatic duct over the guide wire (arrow head) to the distal end of the deeply migrated pancreatic duct stent (arrow)
DISCUSSION:
To our knowledge, there have only been 2 reports of the use of SpyGlass Cholangioscopy System to remove the proximally migrated pancreatic stents. In the first case, the migrated stent was retrieved by SpyBite forceps7 and in the second case, the stent was retrieved by Soehendra Stent Retriever (Wilson-Cook, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA).1 In both cases the pancreatic duct or sphincter had underlying pathology and our report is the first case of successful retrieval of a migrated pancreatic stent in a normal pancreatic duct with SpyGlass Cholangioscopy system and SpyBite forceps.
Technical Tips:
1- We recommend using a guide wire deeply inserted in the proximal part of the pancreatic duct. This technique facilitates the insertion of other instruments such as snare and basket and decreases the risk of unwanted damage to the wall of the pancreatic duct. Also, an inserted guide wire could be useful for identification of pancreatic duct orifice and the course of pancreatic duct in the fluoroscopy.
2- About 2.5 liters of normal saline were used by irrigation pump (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts, USA) during the procedure. We think that using plenty of normal saline facilitates the visualization of pancreatic duct lumen, prevents the lateral damage to the pancreatic duct, and decreases the chance of pancreatitis.
3- The most challenging part of the procedure was to grasp the distal end of the stent by SpyBite forceps. This may be more difficult if the distal end of the stent settles just after any sharp angulation of pancreatic duct.
4- It is recommended that the stent be retrieved very gently if the grasping fails in the midway, as it may waste time and efforts.
SpyGlass Direct Visualization System is a single-operator system. But in difficult and critical cases it could be helpful if the device is detached from the ERCP scope body and another colleague is asked to control and maneuver the SpyGlass Direct Visualization System separately.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The author declares no conflict of interest related to this work.
Please cite this paper as:
Rahimi AR , Ejtehadi F. SpyGlass Pancreatoscopy and Successful Retrieval of a Proximally Migrated Pancreatic Stent; Unusual Case and Technical Tips. Middle East J Dig Dis 2016;8:232-234. DOI: 10.15171/mejdd.2016.26
References
- 1.Maydeo A, Kwek A, Bhandari S, Bapat M, Mathew P. SpyGlass pancreatoscopy-guided cannulation and retrieval of a deeply migrated pancreatic duct stent. Endoscopy. 2011;43 Suppl 2 UCTN:E137–8. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kawaguchi Y, Lin JC, Kawashima Y, Maruno A, Ito H, Ogawa M. et al. Risk factors for migration, fracture, and dislocation of pancreatic stents. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015;2015:365457. doi: 10.1155/2015/365457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Matsumoto K, Katanuma A, Maguchi H. Endoscopic removal technique of migrated pancreatic plastic stents. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014;21:E34–40. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Vila J, Marcos K, Manuel PM. Retrieval of Proximally Migrated Pancreatic Stents. Video Journal and Encyclopedia of GI Endoscopy. 2010;2:584–7. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lu Y, Jin Z, Wu JC, Bie LK, Gong B. Endoscopic retrieval technique of proximally migrated pancreatic stents: a retrospective study in a tertiary centre. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015;2015:485980. doi: 10.1155/2015/485980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Price LH, Brandabur JJ, Kozarek RA, Gluck M, Traverso WL, Irani S. Good stents gone bad: endoscopic treatment of proximally migrated pancreatic duct stents. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:174–9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.12.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kantsevoy SV, Frolova EA, Thuluvath PJ. Successful removal of the proximally migrated pancreatic winged stent by using the SpyGlass visualization system. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:454–5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.11.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
