Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2016 Dec;63(6):676–680. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001213

Effect of Oral Lipid Matrix Supplement on Fat Absorption in Cystic Fibrosis: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial

Virginia A Stallings 1,2, Joan I Schall 1,*, Asim Maqbool 1,2, Maria R Mascarenhas 1,2, Belal N Alshaikh 1,3, Kelly A Dougherty 1,4, Kevin Hommel 5, Jamie Ryan 5, Okan U Elci 6, Walter A Shaw 7
PMCID: PMC5045744  NIHMSID: NIHMS772969  PMID: 27050056

Abstract

Pancreatic enzyme therapy does not normalize dietary fat absorption in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and pancreatic insufficiency (PI). Efficacy of LYM-X-SORBTM (LXS), an easily absorbable lipid matrix that enhances fat absorption was evaluated in a 12-month randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial with plasma fatty acids (FA), and coefficient of fat absorption (CFA) outcomes. 110 subjects (age 10.4±3.0 y) were randomized. Total FA increased with LXS at 3 and 12 months (+1.58; +1.14 mmol/L) and not with placebo (P=0.046). With LXS, linoleic acid (LA) increased at 3 and 12 months (+298; +175 nmol/mL, P≤0.046), with a 6% increase in CFA (P<0.01). LA increase was significant in LXS vs. placebo (445 vs. 42 nmol/mL, P= 0.038). Increased FA and LA predicted increased BMI Z scores. In summary, LXS treatment improved dietary fat absorption compared to placebo as indicated by plasma FA and LA and was associated with better growth status.

Keywords: fatty acids, pancreatic insufficiency, linoleic acid, LYM-X-SORBTM

INTRODUCTION

Nutritional status remains suboptimal in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and pancreatic insufficiency (PI) despite effort to optimize pancreatic enzymes and diets13. Chronic steatorrhea results in loss of fat calories and fat soluble vitamins47, and stool coefficient of fat absorption (CFA) often ranges from 81 to 85%810. In a recent study of over 200 patients, those with CFA < 85% had growth faltering6. Essential fatty acid insufficiency has been associated with poorer growth and pulmonary function, and is in part a consequence of chronic fat malabsorption9, 1118. Second generation LYM-X-SORBTM (LXS) (BioMolecular Products, Byfield, MA; Avanti Polar Lipids, Alabaster, AL)19, with enhanced taste and mixability is a phospholipid- and triglyceride-rich matrix. The aim of this randomized placebo-controlled double-blinded trial was to evaluate the efficacy of 12-month supplementation with LXS to improve fat absorption indicated by plasma fatty acid (FA) concentrations and stool CFA.

METHODS

Subjects aged 5.0 to 17.9 years with CF, PI and mild to moderate lung disease were recruited from ten CF Centers. LXS is composed of lysophosphatidylcholine, triglycerides and FA which form an organized lipid matrix complexed to wheat flour and sugar. Subjects aged 5.0–11.9 years received two packets/day, and subjects aged 12.0–17.9 years received three packets/day. The placebo had similar calories (~150 kcal/packet), total fat, FA and macronutrient distribution. The inclusion/exclusion criteria, study design and method details, LXS composition, and the results for LXS impact on choline status have been previously reported10, 20, 21.

Dietary intake was assessed using 3-day weighed records22, 23. A 72-hour stool sample was collected and total fat content determined (Mayo Medical Laboratories, Rochester, MN), and CFA calculated8. Daily pancreatic enzyme medication use was determined. Subjects completed the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL 4.0)24, and Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R)25, 26.

Quantitation of morning fasting plasma FA was performed in two steps: 1) acid-base hydrolysis; 2) hexane extraction/derivatization with pentafluorobenzyl bromide (Mayo Medical Laboratories). Separation/detection was accomplished by capillary gas chromatography electron-capture negative ion-mass spectrometry, with quantitation based on analysis in selected ion-monitoring mode using 13 stable isotope-labeled internal standards27.

Descriptive statistics were presented as frequency counts and percentages for categorical variables and mean ± standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables. Two-sample t-test (unpaired) or Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and chi-square tests of independence for categorical variables compared characteristics at baseline. Paired t-tests were used to determine the significance of change in quality of life scores from baseline to 12 months.

Changes in outcome measures over time, the main effect of randomization groups, and randomization group (R) by time (T) interactions were investigated on an intent-to-treat basis using mixed effects linear regression models implemented via maximum likelihood accounting for correlations arising from the repeated-measures28. Whether changes in outcomes over time differed by randomization groups were evaluated by examining the interaction effects of randomization group by time (R × T). Similar secondary analysis limited to subjects with LA in the lower quartile range at baseline were performed. Group comparison of percent change in FA over 3 and 12 months was analyzed using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Exploratory analyses using regression models assessed associations among baseline plasma total FA or LA and change (Δ) in total FA or LA status and change in clinical outcomes over time, adjusted for age, sex, and adherence to supplement use. Stata 12.1 was used with significance at 0.05.

RESULTS

There were 110 subjects recruited, 56 randomized to placebo and 54 to LXS supplementation. Subjects (10.4±3.0 years), were 57% male, 57% ΔF508 homozygous, and had mild pulmonary disease (FEV1: 95±23 % predicted), suboptimal growth status (height-for-age Z score: −0.4±0.9; weight-for-age Z score (WAZ): −0.4±0.8; BMI-for-age Z score (BMIZ): −0.2±0.8), and moderate fat malabsorption (CFA: 83±12%). The overall quality of life score (PedsQL) was 82±12 for parent-assessed and 81±13 for the child-assessed measures. The randomization groups did not differ at baseline for any measure.

Twenty-four subjects after baseline (10 placebo, 14 LXS) and 16 subjects after 3 months (7 placebo, 9 LXS) withdrew from the study. Neither the attrition rate nor the reasons for dropping out differed by randomization group29 (see Supplemental Digital Content Figure 1). Dropouts and study completers did not differ at baseline in age, sex, genotype, growth status, plasma FA, intake of dietary fat, LA or pancreatic enzyme use.

Table 1 presents dietary intake of fat, pancreatic enzyme use, fat absorption, and FA for placebo and LXS groups. There were no differences between randomization groups at baseline. The dietary intake included both food intake and supplement (LXS or placebo) adjusted for adherence. Energy intake averaged 119% of the EER, 36% of fat calories. Refer to Supplemental Digital Content Table 1 for the expanded list of dietary intake and plasma FA variables. LXS and placebo supplements provided 300 to 450 calories/day depending on age. Enzyme medication use was less in LXS than placebo group at 12 months (p=0.007). Intake of LA was similar in both groups throughout the study (see Supplemental Digital Content Table 1). CFA improved significantly (6%) in LXS only at both 3 and 12 months (P<0.01). For the LXS group, 39% had moderate fat malabsorption (CFA <80%) at baseline and declined to 11% at 3 months (P = 0.013) and 15% at 12 months (P = 0.025), with no change in the placebo group. Cumulative adherence to supplements was 80 vs. 76% at 3 months, and 75 vs. 71% at 12 months for placebo vs. LXS, respectively.

Table 1.

Dietary Intake, Stool Fat Absorption, Plasma Fatty Acids by Placebo and LYM-X-SORB (LXS) at Baseline, 3 and 12 Months

Time Point Effect of treatment

Baseline 3 month 12 month P0-33 P0-3-124
Dietary Fat, g1,5
 Placebo 98 ± 402 102 ± 30 106 ± 32 0.86 0.57
 LXS 97 ± 29 99 ± 34 105 ± 36
Pancreatic Enzymes, Lipase Units1,6
 Placebo 315,938 ± 129,583 327,870 ± 126,817 340,410 ± 123,118 0.80 0.48
 LXS 288,062 ± 123,885 289,709 ± 128,251 264,533 ± 97,713
Coefficient of Fat Absorption, %7
 Placebo 84 ± 12 85 ± 19 88 ± 11 0.16 0.34
 LXS 82 ± 11 88 ± 7** 87 ± 8**
Lauric (C12:0), nmol/L1,8
 Placebo 23 ± 15 21 ± 12 24 ± 19 0.035 0.039
 LXS 19 ± 12 34 ± 55* 22 ± 23
Palmitoleic (C16:1ω7), nmol/L8
 Placebo 243 ± 154 221 ± 101 236 ± 116 0.003 0.009
 LXS 214 ± 105 299 ± 186*** 292 ± 173**
Linoleic Acid (C18:2ω6), nmol/L8
 Placebo 2333 ± 491 2380 ± 552 2358 ± 500 0.069 0.15
 LXS 2230 ± 528 2522 ± 754** 2405 ± 571*
Oleic (C18:1ω9), nmol/L1,8
 Placebo 1872 ± 557 1798 ± 488 1839 ± 490 0.017 0.046
 LXS 1762 ± 367 2068 ± 775** 1997 ± 589*
Arachidonic (C20:4ω6), nmol/L8
 Placebo 454 ± 143 432 ± 129 458 ± 138 0.023 0.047
 LXS 430 ± 127 463 ± 161 460 ± 143**
Docosatetranoic (C22:4ω6), nmol/L1,8
 Placebo 25 ± 9 23 ± 8 23 ± 8 0.012 0.037
 LXS 22 ± 7 28 ± 13** 26 ± 11**
Total Fatty Acids, mmol/L1,8
 Placebo 9.16 ± 2.18 9.12 ± 2.26 9.30 ± 2.00 0.015 0.046
 LXS 8.56 ± 1.64 10.14 ± 3.63** 9.70 ± 2.83**
1

Log transformation was applied for skewed variables in the mixed models.

2

Mean ± SD (all such values).

3

P0-3 is testing for partial randomization group × time interaction between baseline and 3 month from a mixed effects linear regression model that included baseline, 3, and 12 months data (i. randomization group × time interaction was used).

4

P0-3-12 is testing for randomization group × time interaction between baseline and 3, and 12 month.

5

n=54, 37, and 35 for Placebo group, and n=44, 31, and 23 for LXS group at baseline, 3, and 12 months, respectively.

6

n=56, 46, and 39 for Placebo group, and n=54, 40, and 30 for LXS group at baseline, 3, and 12 months, respectively.

7

n=41, 36, and 30 for Placebo group, and n=35, 27, and 20 for LXS group at baseline, 3, and 12 months, respectively.

8

n=56, 46, and 39 for Placebo group, and n=51, 40, and 31 for LXS group at baseline, 3, and 12 months, respectively.

*(P<0.05) **(P<0.01) ***(P<0.001) difference from baseline within randomization group.

LXS supplementation was associated with increased absorption of total FA over 3 and 12 months (R × T, P0-3-12=0.046), and monounsaturated FA (MUFA, R × T, P0-3-12=0.043), and of saturated FA (SFA) and MUFA) over 3 months (R × T, P0-3<0.022) compared to placebo with the intent-to-treat approach (see Supplemental Digital Content Table 1). Increase from baseline in fasting plasma total FA, SFA, MUFA, polyunsaturated FA (PUFA) and LA was robust (11 to 18%) with LXS compared to small increases (2 to 6%) for placebo (see Supplemental Digital Content Figure 2). Palmitic acid (most abundant SFA), and oleic acid (most abundant MUFA) were significantly increased in LXS compared to placebo. LA (the most abundant PUFA) significantly increased within LXS group only at 3 and 12 months (P<0.05); the difference from placebo approached significance at 3 months (R × T, P0-3=0.069). The baseline mean triene: tetraene ratio (T:T ratio) was 0.05 ± 0.02 in both groups. Elevated T:T ratio above 0.05, a cutoff used to indicate EFA deficiency using non-CF-specific laboratory reference ranges27, was documented in 41% at baseline (39 and 43% in placebo and LXS), and was 26% after 12 months supplementation (23 and 29% placebo and LXS, respectively). This decline was significant for the groups combined (one-sided Fisher’s exact test, P=0.025).

The impact of change in total FA (Δ total FA, increase or decrease) and LA status (Δ LA) on clinical outcomes was explored in the LXS and placebo groups combined. Adjusted for baseline status, age, sex and adherence, Δ total FA positively predicted BMIZ (β coefficient = 0.04, P=0.011) and fat free mass (FFM) (β = 0.19, P=0.005), while Δ LA positively predicted WAZ (β = 0.10, P=0.042) and BMIZ (β = 0.07, P=0.003) (see Supplemental Digital Content Table 2). Improved weight and BMI status was largely attributable to increases in FFM.

Change in LA in subjects whose baseline LA was in the lowest quartile range for this sample (≤ 1920 umol/L) was analyzed (10 in placebo and 17 in LXS group). These subjects had lower BMI at baseline compared to the other quartiles combined (−0.48±0.82 vs. −0.11±0.73; P=0.03). LA increased significantly in LXS group from baseline to 3 and 12 months (1640±198 to 1936±392 and 2120±580 nmol/mL, respectively, P≤0.002). No significant change in LA occurred in placebo group (1693±184 to 1806±429 and 1752±332 nmol/mL, respectively). LA change over time between LXS and placebo was significant at 12 months (R×T, P0-12 = 0.038).

We have previously reported that both LXS and placebo were safe10, 29, and growth status improved in both groups10, 21. Quality of life score indicated by the PedsQL or CFQ-R did not change and there were no differences by randomization group. When the groups combined, there were significant increases from baseline to 12 months in child-assessed emotional functioning subscales from both the PedsQL (75.7±18.5 to 80.8±16.2, P=0.01 by paired t-test) and the CFQ-R (76.8±15.3 to 81.2±14.4, P=0.01), and social functioning and perceived body image (67.0±18.4 to 72.1±16.6 and 77.4±26.0 to 85.3±22.2, respectively, P<0.01) on the CFQ-R.

DISCUSSION

LXS was developed to improve dietary fat absorption when combined with foods and beverages. In children with CF and PI, daily oral supplementation with this easily absorbable phospholipid- and triglyceride-rich lipid matrix was safe and effective, as indicated by increased fasting plasma FA and 6% increase in stool CFA. With fewer pancreatic enzymes, absorption improved with LXS in SFA, MUFA and PUFA compared to placebo, and in LA in the LXS group only, despite similar energy and fat intake in both groups. Improvement in total FA and LA concentrations was associated with better weight and BMI status. Participants had dietary patterns that closely adhered to CF recommendations, with high calorie intake (119 to 124% EER), high fat intake of 97 to 106 g per day (34 to 36% kcal from fat) and appropriate doses of pancreatic enzyme medication for meals and snacks14. CFA at baseline was 82% in this cohort of diet- and enzyme-adherent subjects, compared with the reference value of 93% dietary fat absorption in healthy people5, 30.

Chase et al31 was among the first to provide oral LA and follow the fasting plasma FA absorption response. McKenna et al32 then used both naturally occurring and structured triglycerides to identify fat sources that would enhance absorption in CF and PI. They concluded that both long-term adequate calories as well as supplemental LA were necessary to prevent essential FA deficiency, with optimized pancreatic enzyme replacement. A number of studies to improve LA status with different designs and different LA sources have been conducted more recently3237, none of which offered LA in a more readily absorbable form. In our CF study, baseline dietary intake of LA was 159% of recommendation for healthy people (~18g/day). Both LXS and placebo supplements contained a small amount of LA, and daily intake increased about 15% (to 21 g) in both groups. Only the LXS group showed a significant increase in the fasting plasma LA, and particularly among those with the lowest baseline LA concentrations. These findings indicate that the unique LXS lipid structure and composition resulted in improved LA absorption efficiency.

The more frequently described FA abnormalities in CF include low LA, docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), PUFA, and high T:T ratios1315. Few subjects in the current study had baseline LA concentrations below laboratory reference range. However, over 1/3 had essential FA insufficiency based upon the laboratory reference range for the T:T ratio. It is notable, however, that for subjects more at-risk for LA insufficiency at baseline (LA ≤1920 umol/L), LA concentrations increased by 29% over 12 months in LXS with no change in placebo group. The proportion of subjects with EFA insufficiency based upon the T:T ratio declined significantly from 41% at baseline to 26% after 12 months, with no group difference. This was expected for the LXS group with improved absorption of multiple FAs, but the reason for this improvement in the placebo group was less clear. Perhaps the additional dietary energy, FA and LA in either LXS or placebo supported change in this ratio. It should be noted that this ratio method was developed before reliable actual measurement of plasma LA was clinically available to detect this specific essential FA deficiency.

LA deficiency has clinical consequences including impaired growth, wound healing, and seborrheic dermatitis38. In addition to PI and fat malabsorption5, 39, plasma FA abnormalities may relate to increased energy expenditure, increased oxidative stress40, 41, increased cell membrane turnover42, abnormal release of FA from the cell membrane43, and defects related to specific CF genotypes12, 44. Suboptimal FA status has been associated with poorer pulmonary and growth outcomes in CF13, 45, 46. The type and amount of dietary fat intake predicts FA status including plasma LA, T:T ratio and DHA status in CF9, 47. Here LXS improved overall fat absorption and total FA and LA status improvement was associated with increased WAZ and BMIZ, likely attributable to increased FFM relative to FM. Children with lowest LA concentrations at baseline had significantly lower BMIZ. This may indicate that LXS has the potential to impact growth and nutritional status in children with CF at risk for essential FA insufficiency. HRQOL improved in the domains of emotional functioning, social functioning, and body image, suggesting that the improved weight status observed in both randomization groups was psychosocially beneficial, though this requires further examination.

Study strengths included a study design that supports generalizability with enrollment from 10 CF Centers, successful randomization, and good adherence. Limitations include subject attrition that may have introduced bias, however, there was no evidence that dropouts and completers differed at baseline in demographic, clinical outcome measures, or plasma FA status. Reasons for dropping out did not differ by randomization groups. The study design did not include either a CF or a non-CF, non-intervention group for comparison. The dose of LXS was based on a prior study with LXS in which increased FA concentrations were observed. A higher dose may have a different effect on the outcomes of interest.

In summary, LXS treatment improved dietary fat absorption compared to placebo as indicated by plasma FA, LA and CFA in children with CF and PI who had similar intake of energy, fats and LA, and less pancreatic enzyme medication use. Increased total FA and LA absorption may support better growth status in school aged children. Based on these results and clinical experience, LXS has potential to reduce fat malabsorption in CF clinical care. Further investigation is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of LXS to reduce fat malabsorption and treat or prevent malnutrition in patients with other diagnoses.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Data File _doc_ pdf_ etc._

What is Known

  • Chronic fat malabsorption and loss of dietary calories persists in children and adults with CF and PI in spite of optimization of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy and diet

What is New

  • A randomized double blind clinical trial showed that supplementation with an easily absorbed structured lipid improved dietary fat absorption and fatty acid status, as indicated by increase total fatty acid and linoleic acid concentrations and improved stool coefficient of fat absorption

  • Improved total fatty acid and linoleic acid concentrations were associated with improved growth status in children

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the subjects, parents, other care providers, and all of the CF Centers that participated in the study: Children’s National Medical Center, Washington, DC; Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA; Monmouth Medical Center, Long Branch, NJ; The Pediatric Lung Center, Fairfax, VA; Cystic Fibrosis Center of University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Children’s Hospital of the King’s Daughters, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Cohen Children’s Medical Center, New Hyde Park, NY; St Joseph’s Children’s Hospital, Paterson, NJ, and the Pediatric Specialty Center at Lehigh Valley Hospital, Bethlehem, PA.. The authors also thank Norma Latham, MS, for study coordination, and Megan Johnson, Thananya Wooden, Elizabeth Matarrese, and Nimanee Harris, the staff of the CTRC at CHOP for their valuable contributions to the study.

Footnotes

Reprints: Reprints will not be available from the author

Clinical Research Study: Randomized Double-blinded Placebo-controlled Trial. This protocol was registered as: Study of LYM-X-SORB™ to Improve Fatty Acid and Choline Status in Children with Cystic Fibrosis and Pancreatic Insufficiency, NCT00406536. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00406536.

Author Contributions to Submitted Work

Virginia A. Stallings, MD contributed to the conception/design of the study, was involved in the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of the work, and drafting and revision of the manuscript. She gave final approval of the version to be published, is accountable for all aspects of the work, and attests to its accuracy/integrity.

Joan I. Schall, PhD contributed to the conception/design of the study, was involved in the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of the work, and drafting and revision of the manuscript. She gave final approval of the version to be published, is accountable for all aspects of the work, and attests to its accuracy/integrity.

Asim Maqbool, MD contributed to the conception/design of the study, was involved in the acquisition and interpretation of the work, and drafting and revision of the manuscript. He gave final approval of the version to be published, is accountable for all aspects of the work, and attests to its accuracy/integrity.

Maria R. Mascarenhas, MBBS contributed to the conception/design of the study, was involved in the acquisition and interpretation of the work, and drafting and revision of the manuscript. She gave final approval of the version to be published, is accountable for all aspects of the work, and attests to its accuracy/integrity.

Belal N. Alshaikh, MD contributed to the analysis and interpretation of the work, and drafting and revision of the manuscript. He gave final approval of the version to be published, is accountable for all aspects of the work, and attests to its accuracy/integrity.

Kelly A. Dougherty, PhD contributed to the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of the work, and drafting and revision of the manuscript. She gave final approval of the version to be published, is accountable for all aspects of the work, and attests to its accuracy/integrity.

Okan Elci, PhD contributed to the analysis and interpretation of the work, and drafting and revision of the manuscript. He gave final approval of the version to be published, is accountable for all aspects of the work, and attests to its accuracy/integrity.

Kevin A. Hommel, PhD contributed to the conception/design of the study, was involved in the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of the work, and drafting and revision of the manuscript. He gave final approval of the version to be published, is accountable for all aspects of the work, and attests to its accuracy/integrity.

Jamie Ryan, PhD was involved in the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of the work, and drafting and revision of the manuscript. She gave final approval of the version to be published, is accountable for all aspects of the work, and attests to its accuracy/integrity.

Walter Shaw, PhD contributed to the conception/design of the study, was involved in the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of the work, and drafting and revision of the manuscript. He gave final approval of the version to be published, is accountable for all aspects of the work, and attests to its accuracy/integrity.

Conflicts of Interest and Sources of Funding: Supported by NIDDK (R44DK060302), and the Nutrition Center at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. The project described was supported by the National Center for Research Resources, Grant UL1RR024134, and is now at the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Grant UL1TR000003. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. VAS, JIS, AM, BNA, MRM, KAD, KH, JR, and OUE have no financial disclosures or potential conflicts of interest. WAS, President of Avanti Polar Lipids, Inc. was the principal investigator of the NIH Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) award.

References

  • 1.Borowitz D, Baker RD, Stallings V. Consensus report on nutrition for pediatric patients with cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2002;35:246–259. doi: 10.1097/00005176-200209000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Smyth R, Walters S. Oral calorie supplements for cystic fibrosis (review) Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2007 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000406.pub2. Art. No.:CD000406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. Patient Registry: 2012 Annual Data Report. Bethesda, MD: Cystic Fibrosis Foundation; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Taylor JR, Gardner TB, Waljee AK, et al. Systematic review: efficacy and safety of pancreatic enzyme supplements for exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;31:57–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04157.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kalivianakis M, Minich DM, Bijleveld CM, et al. Fat malabsorption in cystic fibrosis patients receiving enzyme replacement therapy is due to impaired intestinal uptake of long-chain fatty acids. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69:127–134. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/69.1.127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Woestenenk JW, van der Ent CK, Houwen RH. Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy and coefficient of fat absorption in children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015 doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Littlewood JM, Wolfe SP, Conway SP. Diagnosis and treatment of intestinal malabsorption in cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2006;41:35–49. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cohen JR, Schall JI, Ittenbach RF, Zemel BS, et al. Pancreatic status verification in children with cystic fibrosis: fecal elastase status predicts prospective changes in nutritional status. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2005;40:438–444. doi: 10.1097/01.mpg.0000158222.23181.1c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Maqbool A, Schall JI, Gallagher PR, et al. Relation between dietary fat intake type and serum fatty acid status in children with cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012;55:605–611. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3182618f33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Schall JI, Mascarenhas MR, Maqbool A, et al. Choline supplementation with a structured lipid in children with cystic cibrosis: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015 Oct 9; doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Colombo C, Bennato V, Costantini D, et al. Dietary and circulating polyunsaturated fatty acids in cystic fibrosis: are they related to clinical outcomes? J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2006;43:660–665. doi: 10.1097/01.mpg.0000235978.59873.04. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Strandvik B, Gronowitz E, Enlund F, et al. Essential fatty acid deficiency in relation to genotype in patients with cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr. 2001;139:650–655. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2001.118890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Maqbool A, Schall JI, Garcia-Espana JF, et al. Serum linoleic acid status as a clinical indicator of essential fatty acid status in children with cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2008;47:635–644. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31817fb76b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Strandvik B. Fatty acid metabolism in cystic fibrosis. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2010;83:121–129. doi: 10.1016/j.plefa.2010.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Freedman SD, Blanco PG, Zaman MM, et al. Association of cystic fibrosis with abnormalities in fatty acid metabolism. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:560–569. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Van Biervliet S, Vanbillemont G, Van Biervliet JP, et al. Relation between fatty acid composition and clinical status or genotype in cystic fibrosis patients. Ann Nutr Metab. 2007;51:541–549. doi: 10.1159/000114208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Coste TC, Armand M, Lebacq J, et al. An overview of monitoring and supplementation of omega 3 fatty acids in cystic fibrosis. Clin Biochem. 2007;40:511–520. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2007.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Freedman SD, Blanco PG, Zaman MM, et al. Association of cystic fibrosis with abnormalities in fatty acid metabolism. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:560–569. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lepage G, Yesair DW, Ronco N, et al. Effect of an organized lipid matrix on lipid absorption and clinical outcomes in patients with cystic fibrosis. Journal of Pediatrics. 2002;141:178–185. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2002.124305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bertolaso C, Groleau V, Schall JI, et al. Fat-soluble vitamins in cystic fibrosis and pancreatic insufficiency: efficacy of a nutrition intervention. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014;58:443–448. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Groleau V, Schall JI, Dougherty KA, et al. Effect of a dietary intervention on growth and energy expenditure in children with cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros. 2014;13:768–771. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2014.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Institute of Medicine. Dietary reference intakes for thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, vitamin B6, folate, vitamin B12, pantothenic acid, biotin, and choline. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1998. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein and Amino Acids. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press; 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Varni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS. PedsQL 4.0: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4. 0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations. Med Care. 2001;39:800–812. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200108000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Modi AC, Quittner AL. Validation of a disease-specific measure of health-related quality of life for children with cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr Psychol. 2003;28:535–545. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsg044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Quittner AL, Buu A, Messer MA, et al. Development and validation of The Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire in the United States: a health-related quality-of-life measure for cystic fibrosis. Chest. 2005;128:2347–2354. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.4.2347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lagerstedt SA, Hinrichs DR, Batt SM, et al. Quantitative determination of plasma c8–c26 total fatty acids for the biochemical diagnosis of nutritional and metabolic disorders. Mol Genet Metab. 2001;73:38–45. doi: 10.1006/mgme.2001.3170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fitzmaurice GM, Laird NM, Ware JH. Applied Longitudinal Analyses. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Alshaikh B, Schall JI, Maqbool A, et al. Choline supplementation alters some amino acid concentrations with no change in homocysteine in children with cystic fiborosis and pancreatic insufficiency. Nutr Res. 2016 doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2015.12.014. (in press) HHS Public Access, Nutr Res. Author manuscript. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Borowitz D, Konstan MW, O’Rourke A, et al. Coefficients of fat and nitrogen absorption in healthy subjects and individuals with cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2007;12:47–52. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-12.1.47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chase HP, Welch NN, Rabaglia ME, et al. Linoleic acid absorption in children with cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1982;1:49–54. doi: 10.1097/00005176-198201010-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.McKenna MC, Hubbard VS, Bieri JG. Linoleic acid absorption from lipid supplements in patients with cystic fibrosis with pancreatic insufficiency and in control subjects. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1985;4:45–51. doi: 10.1097/00005176-198502000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Olveira G, Olveira C, Acosta E, et al. Fatty acid supplements improve respiratory, inflammatory and nutritional parameters in adults with cystic fibrosis. Arch Bronconeumol. 2010;46:70–77. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2009.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Steinkamp G, Demmelmair H, Ruhl-Bagheri I, et al. Energy supplements rich in linoleic acid improve body weight and essential fatty acid status of cystic fibrosis patients. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2000;31:418–423. doi: 10.1097/00005176-200010000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Keen C, Olin AC, Eriksson S, et al. Supplementation with fatty acids influences the airway nitric oxide and inflammatory markers in patients with cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2010;50:537–544. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181b47967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Oliver C, Watson H. Omega-3 fatty acids for cystic fibrosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;11:CD002201. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002201.pub4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Al-Turkmani MR, Freedman SD, Laposata M. Fatty acid alterations and n-3 fatty acid supplementation in cystic fibrosis. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2007;77:309–318. doi: 10.1016/j.plefa.2007.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Farrell PM, Mischler EH, Engle MJ, et al. Fatty acid abnormalities in cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Res. 1985;19:104–109. doi: 10.1203/00006450-198501000-00028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kalivianakis M, Verkade HJ. The mechanisms of fat malabsorption in cystic fibrosis patients. Nutrition. 1999;15:167–169. doi: 10.1016/s0899-9007(98)00155-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wood LG, Fitzgerald DA, Gibson PG, et al. Increased plasma fatty acid concentrations after respiratory exacerbations are associated with elevated oxidative stress in cystic fibrosis patients. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;75:668–675. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/75.4.668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wood LG, Fitzgerald DA, Lee AK, et al. Improved antioxidant and fatty acid status of patients with cystic fibrosis after antioxidant supplementation is linked to improved lung function. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;77:150–159. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/77.1.150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ulane MM, Butler JD, Peri A, et al. Cystic fibrosis and phosphatidylcholine biosynthesis. Clin Chim Acta. 1994;230:109–116. doi: 10.1016/0009-8981(94)90263-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Carlstedt-Duke J, Bronnegard M, Strandvik B. Pathological regulation of arachidonic acid release in cystic fibrosis: the putative basic defect. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986;83:9202–9206. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.23.9202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bhura-Bandali FN, Suh M, Man SFP, et al. The Delta F508 mutation in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator alters control of essential fatty acid utilization in epithelial cells. Journal of Nutrition. 2000;130:2870–2875. doi: 10.1093/jn/130.12.2870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Shoff SM, Ahn HY, Davis L, et al. Temporal associations among energy intake, plasma linoleic acid, and growth improvement in response to treatment initiation after diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. Pediatrics. 2006;117:391–400. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Walkowiak J, Lisowska A, Blaszczynski M, et al. Polyunsaturated fatty acids in cystic fibrosis are related to nutrition and clinical expression of the disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2007;45:488–489. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3180690da9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Corey M, McLaughlin FJ, Williams M, et al. A comparison of survival, growth, and pulmonary function in patients with cystic fibrosis in Boston and Toronto. J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41:583–591. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(88)90063-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Data File _doc_ pdf_ etc._

RESOURCES