Dear editor
McPhail’s review tackles the problem of our generation in the developed world – the ageing population increasing the proportion of patients with multiple comorbidities.1 Combined with chronic underfunding, this problem has had, and will continue to have a huge financial burden on the United Kingdom’s National Health Service (UK NHS).2,3 In recent years, a pattern of regular crippling winter “crisis” in NHS hospitals has emerged, with some questioning the sustainability of a “free at the point of access” service.4,5
McPhail highlights the importance of prioritizing research in health system approaches to combat this burden. We wholeheartedly agree with this point, and believe the development of new health care systems is crucial to the survival of the NHS. This need is currently reflected in pilot “vanguard” schemes being utilized in England to fast-track health system and service innovation.6 However, the focus on health care systems, and in particular service innovation, may not be enough to sustain the UK NHS.
Modifiable risk factors appear to be at the root cause of many of the most prevalent and costly comorbidities in the UK, most importantly in obesity, smoking, and alcohol consumption.3 As a result, innovation in preventing such conditions is hugely important to the sustainability of the NHS as we know it. Public health approaches to reducing smoking prevalence have shown mixed results, with efforts to curb obesity through reduced sugar consumption suffering from suboptimal levels of investment.7,8
It is imperative to not only further invest in public health approaches to prevent highly prevalent risk factors, but to also foster innovation in these approaches to ensure effective use of these financial resources. This innovation may come from a multitude of sources. One option is to utilize marketing techniques already used in the unhealthy food industries to promote healthier options.8 While another option could be to alter policy and regulations to modify food and alcohol consumption patterns.8
In conclusion, public health approaches have the potential to save a large amount of downstream financial resources in the NHS – however there has to be a focus on both adequate investment and effective use of public health techniques.
Footnotes
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this communication.
References
- 1.McPhail SM. Multimorbidity in chronic disease: impact on health care resources and costs. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2016;9:143–156. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S97248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rudisill C, Charlton J, Booth HP, Gulliford MC. Are healthcare costs from obesity associated with body mass index, comorbidity or depression? Cohort study using electronic health records. Clin Obes. 2016;6(3):225–231. doi: 10.1111/cob.12144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Scarborough P, Bhatnagar P, Wickramasinghe KK, Allender S, Foster C, Rayner M. The economic burden of ill health due to diet, physical inactivity, smoking, alcohol and obesity in the UK: an update to 2006–07 NHS costs. J Public Health (Oxf) 2011;33(4):527–535. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdr033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Filochowski J. A SUSTAINABLE HEALTH SERVICE. Why the NHS is facing a crisis again this winter. Health Serv J. 2016;125(6472):16–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pencheon D. Making health care more sustainable: the case of the English NHS. Public Health. 2015;129(10):1335–1343. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.NHS England. NEWCARE MODELS: Vanguards - developing a blueprint for the future of NHS and care services. 2016. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/new_care_models.pdf.
- 7.Lewis S, Sims M, Richardson S, et al. The effectiveness of tobacco control television advertisements in increasing the prevalence of smoke-free homes. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:869. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2207-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Public Health England Sugar Reduction: The evidence for action. 2015. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/470179/Sugar_reduction_The_evidence_for_action.pdf.