Abstract
Ionotropic activation of NMDA receptors (NMDARs) requires agonist glutamate and co-agonist glycine. Here we show that glycine enhances the activation of cell survival-promoting kinase Akt in cultured cortical neurons in which both the channel activity of NMDARs and the glycine receptors are pre-inhibited. The effect of glycine is reduced by shRNA-mediated knockdown of GluN2A subunit-containing NMDARs (GluN2ARs), suggesting that a non-ionotropic activity of GluN2ARs mediates glycine-induced Akt activation. In support of this finding, glycine enhances Akt activation in HEK293 cells over-expressing GluN2ARs. The effect of glycine on Akt activation is sensitive to the antagonist of glycine-GluN1 binding site. As a functional consequence, glycine protects against excitotoxicity-induced neuronal death through the non-ionotropic activity of GluN2ARs and the neuroprotective effect is attenuated by Akt inhibition. Thus, this study reveals an unexpected role of glycine in eliciting a non-ionotropic activity of GluN2ARs to confer neuroprotection via Akt activation.
The N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) is a subtype of ionotropic glutamate receptors that mediate the vast majority of excitatory neurotransmission in the mammalian central nervous system (CNS)1. NMDARs are ligand-gated Ca2+-permeable channels that consist of GluN1, GluN2 (GluN2A-GluN2D) and GluN3 (GluN3A-GluN3B) subunits2. The GluN2A- and GluN2B-containing NMDARs (GluN2ARs and GluN2BRs) are the major combinations of NMDARs expressed in CNS1. The binding of agonist glutamate to GluN2 subunits and co-agonist glycine to GluN1 subunits is required to activate GluN2ARs and GluN2BRs3, which play essential roles in synaptic plasticity4,5, neural development6,7 and glutamate-induced neurotoxicity8,9,10.
Different GluN2 subunits confer distinct roles of NMDAR subtypes and link them with different intracellular signaling pathways11,12,13. Previous evidence suggests that GluN2BR-mediated neurotoxicity induces neuronal death14,15,16, and that enhancement of GluN2AR activity promotes neuronal survival16,17,18. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the differential effects of GluN2ARs and GluN2BRs in neuronal survival and death are not fully understood.
While it is well known for its ionotropic function, NMDAR has been recently shown to have non-ionotropic activity19,20,21,22,23,24,25. For example, ligand binding to NMDARs is sufficient to induce long-term depression (LTD), but does not require ion flow through NMDARs20. A non-ionotropic activity is found to be mediated through GluN2BR and is required for β-amyloid–induced synaptic depression21,22. The non-ionotropic activity of NMDARs is shown to drive structural shrinkage at spiny synapses24 and couple Src family kinases to pannexin-1 in excitotoxic injury25. In the present study, we reveal that glycine alone elicits a non-ionotropic activity of GluN2ARs but not GluN2BRs. We demonstrate that glycine confers neuroprotection through non-ionotropic activation of GluN2ARs and subsequent enhancement of Akt activation.
Results
Glycine increases Akt phosphorylation independent of Ca2+ influx through NMDAR channels
To test the effect of glycine on the activation of cell survival-promoting kinase Akt (protein kinase B) in cultured mouse cortical neurons where no Ca2+ pass through the NMDAR channels, we treated the neurons with glycine (100 μM) for 30 min in a modified extracellular solution (5.0 mM EGTA, 137 mM NaCl, 5.4 mM KCl, 1.0 mM MgCl2, 25 mM HEPES, 33 mM Glucose, titrated to pH 7.4 with osmolarity of 300–320 mOsm) in which Ca2+ was not included but with the addition of 5.0 mM EGTA to chelate the residual Ca2+. The activation of Akt was quantified by measuring Akt phosphorylation (p-Akt) on Ser473 in western blot assay26,27. The levels of p-Akt were quantified by calculating the ratio of p-Akt to total Akt (t-Akt). Our results showed that treatment of glycine (100 μM) for 30 min increased Akt phosphorylation in the cortical neurons in which there were no Ca2+ influx into the NMDAR channels (Fig. 1A).
To exclude the possibility that residual Ca2+ in the extracellular solution might pass through NMDAR channels, we treated the neurons with the extracellular solution described above but with the addition of non-competitive NMDAR antagonist MK-80128,29. We named this specific Ca2+-free extracellular solution as ECS-1 (10 μM MK-801, 5.0 mM EGTA, 137 mM NaCl, 5.4 mM KCl, 1.0 mM MgCl2, 25 mM HEPES, 33 mM Glucose, titrated to pH 7.4 with osmolarity of 300–320 mOsm). Since MK-801 is a use-dependent pharmacological agent, we first treated the neurons with NMDA (1.0 μM) and glycine (1.0 μM) for 1.0 min that opened the NMDAR channels and allowed MK-801 in the ECS-1 to fully block NMDARs28,29,30. The cultured neurons were then washed with ECS-1 for three times (10 min wash/each). As this procedure eliminates the possibility of Ca2+ in activation of NMDAR channels, in this study we referred to this as NMDAR channel inactivation procedure (Fig. 1B). As shown in Fig. 1C, glycine (100 μM) treatment increased Akt phosphorylation in the cortical neurons where the NMDAR channel activity was inhibited by the NMDAR channel inactivation procedure. In the same experimental conditions, the effect of glycine on Akt phosphorylation was found to be dose-dependent (Fig. 1D). These data indicate the possibility that glycine-induced Akt activation is independent of the channel activity of NMDARs.
To provide further evidence that the effect of glycine on Akt phosphorylation was independent of extracellular Ca2+, we tested the effect of BAPTA, a Ca2+ chelator that has faster calcium-binding kinetics than EGTA31. The experimental condition was same as that in Fig. 1C. But BAPTA (0.1, 1.0 or 5.0 mM) was included in the ECS-1 in the +BAP groups (Fig. 1E). BAPTA was included both during the NMDAR channel inactivation procedure and during treatment with glycine. Compared with the group without BAPTA treatment, BAPTA treatment did not interfere with glycine-induced elevation of Akt phosphorylation (Fig. 1E), suggesting that Ca2+-mediated channel activity of NMDARs does not contribute to the observed effect of glycine in cortical neurons.
Elevation of Akt phosphorylation by glycine does not depend on the activation of glycine receptors
Glycine is the agonist for strychnine-sensitive glycine receptors. Glycine receptors are not significantly expressed in the mature but expressed in the developing cortex32,33. To exclude the possible effect of glycine receptors on the observed Akt activation by glycine, we used the same experimental design as that in Fig. 1C. But strychnine was added into the ECS-1 for all the treatment in both –Gly and +Gly group (Fig. 2A). Our data showed that strychnine (10 μM) failed to block the enhancement of Akt phosphorylation by glycine (100 μM) in cortical neurons subjected to NMDAR channel inactivation procedure (Fig. 2A). Thus, glycine-induced enhancement of Akt phosphorylation does not depend on the activation of strychnine-sensitive glycine receptors.
Glycine does not affect p38-MAPK activation in cortical neurons where NMDAR channel activities and glycine receptors are inhibited
The p38-MAPK is implicated in NMDAR-dependent LTD34, and was shown to be activated by non-ionotropic NMDAR signaling after chemical LTD induction20,24. The activation of p38-MAPK is also involved in excitotoxicity35. To determine whether glycine also altered p38-MAPK signaling independent of glycine receptors and the activation of NMDAR channels, we tested the effect of glycine on p38-MAPK phosphorylation in cortical neurons following the experimental procedure described in Fig. 2A. Our results showed that glycine (100 μM) had no significant effect on p38-MAPK phosphorylation in our experimental conditions (Fig. 2B), suggesting that a specific activation of Akt but not p38-MAPK by glycine occurs in the condition in which NMDAR channel activities and glycine receptors were suppressed.
Glycine enhances Akt activation through a non-ionotropic activation of GluN2ARs
Our results thus far suggest a non-ionotropic activity of NMDAR to mediate the potentiation of Akt activation by glycine. To provide direct evidence for this possibility, we measured the effects of glycine on Akt phosphorylation in HEK293 cells transiently over-expressing NMDARs. The cDNAs of GluN1, GluN2A and/or GluN2B subunits were transfected in various combinations into the HEK293 cells36. The Ca2+-mediated channel activities of NMDARs expressed in the transfected cells were inhibited by the NMDAR channel inactivation procedure. Treatment of glycine (100 μM) for 30 min had no effect on Akt phosphorylation in both non-transfected HEK293 cells and the cells transfected with cDNAs of green fluorescence protein (GFP) (Fig. 3A). However, glycine increased Akt phosphorylation in HEK293 cells transfected with cDNAs of GluN1 + GluN2A following the NMDAR channel inactivation procedure (Fig. 3B), but not in cells transfected with cDNAs of GluN1 + GluN2B (Fig. 3C). We also found that glycine did not increase Akt phosphorylation in HEK293 cells transfected with cDNAs of GluN1, GluN2A and GluN2B, respectively (Fig. 3D). Together, these results indicate that a non-ionotropic activity of GluN2ARs mediates the elevation of Akt phosphorylation by glycine.
The N598Q and N598R in GluN1 subunit is a critical residue at the selectivity filter of the NMDAR channel that determines calcium permeability37. The GluN1(N598Q) mutant and GluN1(N598R) mutant have been shown to cause decreased calcium permeability of NMDAR channels37,38,39. To test the effect of GluN1(N598Q) and GluN1(N598R) on the enhancement of Akt activation by glycine, we transfected GluN1(N598Q), GluN2A + GluN1(N598Q), GluN1(N598R), GluN2A + GluN1(N598R) in HEK293 cells that were treated with standard ECS (137 mM NaCl, 5.4 mM KCl, 1.3 mM CaCl2, 1.0 mM MgCl2, 25 mM HEPES, 33 mM Glucose, titrated to pH 7.4 with osmolarity of 300–320 mOsm). As shown in Fig. 3E,F, glycine (100 μM) increased Akt phosphorylation in HEK293 cells transfected with GluN2A + GluN1(N598Q) or GluN2A + GluN1(N598R). These results provide molecular evidence supporting the notion that GluN2AR-mediated Akt activation is independent of Ca2+ influx.
To validate the role of a non-ionotropic activity of GluN2AR in mediating the enhancement of Akt activation by glycine in cortical neurons, we applied a GluN2A knockdown approach. The GluN2A protein expression was suppressed in the cultured cortical neurons transducted with GluN2A shRNA lentiviral particles (Fig. 4A). The same experimental design as that in Fig. 1C was applied to inhibit NMDARs. As shown in Fig. 4B, glycine (100 μM) increased Akt phosphorylation in neurons transducted with lentiviral shRNA control, but the effect of glycine was significantly reduced in neurons transducted with lentiviral GluN2A shRNA. As another control of GluN2A shRNA against GluN2A, the GluN2B shRNA had no influence on the observed effect of glycine (Fig. 4C,D). These results lead us to conclude that glycine promotes Akt activation through a non-ionotropic activity of GluN2ARs in cortical neurons.
The glycine-GluN1 binding site mediates the non-ionotropic activation of GluN2ARs
To determine how glycine exerts its effect through the non-ionotropic activation of GluN2ARs, we tested the effect of glycine-GluN1 binding site antagonist L-689560 on glycine-induced Akt activation after Ca2+-mediated channel activities of NMDARs were inhibited40,41,42,43. The L-689560 was included in the ECS-1 in the wash step of the NMDAR channel inactivation procedure and in the step of glycine treatment (Fig. 1B). The cultures were then treated with ECS-1 containing glycine (100 μM) and L-689560 for 30 min. We showed that after the channel activities of NMDARs were inhibited, L-689560 (50 μM) blocked glycine-induced Akt phosphorylation in the cultured neurons and in the HEK293 cells transfected with GluN1 + GluN2A (Fig. 5A,B). These data suggest that the glycine-GluN1 binding is required for the non-ionotropic activation of GluN2ARs.
As a control study, we also tested the effect GluN2B antagonist Ro 25-6981 (5.0 μM)42,43. Our data showed that Ro 25-6981 had no significant effect on glycine-induced Akt activation in the neurons and the HEK293 cells transfected with GluN1 + GluN2A + GluN2B after Ca2+-mediated NMDAR channel activity was inhibited (Fig. 5C,D).
D-serine is the endogenous agonist of glycine-GluN1 binding site44. As a further support for the role of glycine-GluN1 binding in mediating the effect of non-ionotropic GluN2ARs, we tested the role of D-serine in Akt phosphorylation in the cortical neurons and the HEK293 cells transfected with GluN1 + GluN2A or GluN1 + GluN2B following NMDAR channel inactivation procedure. D-serine increased Akt phosphorylation in both cortical neurons and HEK293 cells transfected with cDNAs of GluN1 + GluN2A but not with those of GluN1 + GluN2B (Fig. 5E–G).
Glycine prevents glutamate neurotoxicity-induced neuronal death through non-ionotropic activation of GluN2ARs
As Akt is a survival-promoting kinase that plays a crucial role in preventing neuronal death26,45,46, we measured the effect of non-ionotropic activation of NMDARs by glycine on Akt phosphorylation in glutamate neurotoxicity-induced neuronal injury. The injury was produced by treating the cultured cortical neurons with standard ECS containing glutamate (100 μM) and glycine (1.0 μM) for 1.0 h (Fig. 6A). To block Ca2+-mediated channel activities of NMDARs, following 1.0 h injury and 30 min wash with standard ECS, the cultures were treated with standard ECS containing 10 μM MK-801 for 23.5 h. For the Control group (Con; Fig. 6B–F), the culture was treated with maintenance medium for 25 h. For the Sham group (Fig. 6B–F), the culture was treated with standard ECS for 25 h. For the injury group (Inj; Fig. 6B–F), the cultures were treated with standard ECS for 24 h following the injury by glutamate (100 μM) + glycine (1.0 μM) for 1.0 h. For the group of glycine, MK-801 or MK-801 + glycine treatment in injured cultures (Inj + Gly, Inj + MK or Inj + MK + Gly; Fig. 6B–D), following the 1.0 h injury the cultures were first washed with standard ECS containing MK-801 (10 μM) for three times (10 min wash/each), and then treated with standard ECS containing glycine (100 μM), MK-801 (10 μM) or MK-801 (10 μM) + glycine (100 μM) for 23.5 h. For the group of MK-801 treatment in uninjured cultures (MK; Fig. 6B–D), the cultures were treated with standard ECS containing MK-801 (10 μM) for 25 h. The Double labeling of propidium iodide (PI) and fluorescein diacetate (FDA) was performed to measure neuronal viability47. The levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) released from injured neurons was also measured to quantify the neuronal damage27. Our data showed that after glutamate neurotoxicity insult, glycine (100 μM) treatment protected against the death of cortical neurons in which Ca2+-mediated NMDAR channel activity was inhibited (Fig. 6B–D).
Our results further demonstrated that the neuroprotective effect of glycine (100 μM) was reduced in injured cortical neurons in which the GluN2A expression was suppressed by lentiviral GluN2A shRNA (Fig. 6E,F). The neurons in both shRNA control and GluN2A shRNA groups were subjected to the same experimental procedures described in Fig. 6B–D. We conclude that the neuroprotective effect of glycine is at least in part mediated through non-ionotropic activation of GluN2ARs in glutamate neurotoxicity-induced neuronal injury.
To determine the roles of Akt activation and glycine-GluN1 binding in glycine-induced neuroprotection, we tested the effect of Akt inhibitor IV and glycine-GluN1 binding antagonist L-689560 in our experimental model. The experimental condition was the same as that described in Fig. 6A–D. The Akt inhibitor IV and L-689560 were included in both wash and treatment steps. We found that both Akt inhibitor IV (1.0 μM) and L-689560 (50 μM) significantly reduced glycine-induced neuroprotective effect in neurons where Ca2+-mediated channel activity of NMDARs were inhibited (Fig. 6G,H). Thus, Akt activation and glycine-GluN1 binding mediate glycine-induced neuroprotection. Together, these results provide functional evidence for the role of non-ionotropic activity of GluN2ARs in mediating the neuroprotective effect of glycine.
Discussion
Using a Ca2+-free ECS-based procedure to inactivate the channel activity of NMDARs in cultured cortical neurons and HEK293 cells expressing GluN2ARs, we tested the effect of glycine on Akt phosphorylation, a cellular process playing important role in neuronal survival. We provided the first evidence that glycine induced a potentiation of Akt phosphorylation independent of the channel activity of NMDARs. We confirmed that glycine-induced non-ionotropic activation of GluN2ARs, but not GluN2BRs, mediated the enhancement of Akt activation. Thus, our study identified a non-ionotropic function of GluN2ARs. To ensure no Ca2+-mediated channel activities of NMDARs contributing to glycine-induced effect in our study, we established a NMDAR channel inactivation procedure in which Ca2+ was not included in the ECS but with the addition of Ca2+ chelator EGTA and the use-dependent open channel blocker MK-801. To allow MK-801 to fully block the channels of NMDARs, we pretreated the cells with NMDA and glycine to open the NMDAR channels. Thus, Ca2+ influx through NMDARs would not likely occur in our experimental conditions.
Increasing evidence supports the non-ionotropic function of NMDARs19,20,21,22,23,24,25. It has been recently shown that a non-ionotropic activation of NMDAR was insensitive to the glycine-GluN1 site antagonist20,21,24. However, our study shows that the glycine-GluN1 binding is required to activate the non-ionotropic activity of GluN2ARs. These findings suggest that glycine triggers a non-ionotropic activity of GluN2ARs through the glycine-GluN1 binding site. By testing the effects of glycine in HEK293 transfected with different combinations of NMDARs, we were able to obtain direct evidence to reveal that a non-ionotropic activation of GluN2ARs but not GluN2BRs mediates the enhancement of Akt activation.
The novel non-ionotropic NMDAR may have functional significance. NMDAR-mediated neurotoxicity induces neuronal death and neurodegeneration in various CNS disorders including ischemic stroke, traumatic brain injury and neurodegenerative diseases48,49,50. However, the use of NMDAR antagonists as neuroprotective agents was disappointing in clinical trials51,52,53. A simple possibility is that these antagonists, while suppressing NMDAR-mediated neurotoxicity, block the biological and/or neural survival-promoting effects of NMDARs1,16,17,18. Thus, identification of molecular mechanisms by which specific NMDAR subtype selectively exerts its effect on neuronal survival or death would provide a critical basis for the development of potent therapy for CNS injuries and neurodegenerative diseases.
GluN2ARs and GluN2BRs play different role in neuronal survival or death14,16. But the underlying molecular mechanism remains unclear. It is recently reported that a non-ionotropic function of NMDARs was required for β-amyloid–induced synaptic depression and synaptic loss21,22,23, providing new evidence for the involvement of GluN2BRs in neurotoxicity. Our observation for a non-ionotropic activation of GluN2ARs by glycine explains in part why GluN2AR plays a different role than GluN2BR in neuronal survival.
The molecular mechanism underlying glycine-induced non-ionotropic NMDAR activation is unclear. It is possible that glycine binds to GluN1 and induces conformational changes in GluN2A. If this is the case, why it cannot change the conformation of GluN2B? The different structure between GluN1-GluN2A coupling and GluN1-GLuN2B coupling may be the possible reason. Future study is required to reveal the mechanisms.
How non-ionotropic activity of GluN2ARs enhances Akt activation is unclear. It is likely that the C-terminal domain of GluN2A may mediate the effect of glycine on Akt activation. Akt deactivation is believed to be a causal mediator of cell death26,45,46. Enhancement of Akt activity exerts pro-survival effect in neuronal injury and neurodegenerative diseases26,45,46. In this study, we identify Akt as a downstream neuroprotective signal of glycine that activates non-ionotropic GluN2ARs. We provide evidence that non-ionotropic activation of GluN2ARs by glycine reduces glutamate neurotoxicity-induced Akt deactivation and thus prevents cortical neuronal death. Akt is known to influence neuronal survival through activation or inhibition of substrates26,45,46. For example, activated Akt promotes survival through phosphorylation of transcription factors forkhead/FOXO, NF-κB and mdm2 or through phosphorylation of Bcl-2 family members Bad and Bim26,45,46. Further study is needed to determine which Akt-dependent signal pathway mediates the activation of non-ionotropic GluN2ARs by glycine.
It would be important to determine where is glycine coming from considering the brain does not normally have glycinergic transmissions. Glial cells would be the source of glycine release, especially during the ischemia injury process. In this study, we show that D-serine has similar effect to glycine, suggesting that D-serine is also the endogenous agonist for this non-ionotropic NMDA receptor activity.
Experimental Procedures
General methods
Randomization was used to assign samples to the experimental groups, and to collect and process data. All animal experiments were approved and carried out in compliance with the IACUC guidelines of University of Nevada and Wuhan University School of Medicine. All experimental protocols were approved by the Animal Care and Ethics Committee of University of Nevada and Wuhan University School of Medicine.
Neuronal culture
The cortical neuronal cultures were prepared from female C57BL/6 mice at gestation day 17 as described27,54. Briefly, dissociated neurons were suspended in plating medium (Neurobasal medium, 2% B-27 supplement, 0.5% FBS, 0.5 μM L-glutamine, and 25 μM glutamic acid) and plated on poly-D-lysine coated Petri dishes. After 1 day in culture, half of the plating medium was removed and replaced with maintenance medium (Neurobasal medium, 2% B-27 supplement, and 0.5 μM L-glutamine). Thereafter, maintenance medium was changed in the same manner every 3 days. The cultured neurons were used for experiments at 12 days after plating.
HEK293 cell culture, plasmid transfections and shRNA lentiviral particle treatment
HEK293 cells were grown in RPMI 1640 medium (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 10% FBS and Pen/Strep (10 μg/ml). The plasmids of GFP, GluN1, GluN2A, GluN2B, GluN1(N598Q), GluN1(N598R) were transfected in cultured HEK293 cells36. Transfections were performed using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) as described in our previous studies15,27. DNA-Lipofectamine complexes were made in serum-free medium Opti-MEM. To prevent NMDAR-induced cell death, the transfected HEK293 cells were treated with 1.0 mM DAPV to prevent NMDAR-induced excitotoxicity55. The transduction of GluN2A and GluN2B shRNA lentiviral particles were performed in cultured cortical neurons based on the manufacturer’s instructions.
Western blotting
Western blotting assay was performed as described previously15,27. For the detection of phospho-Akt, the samples prepared in the same day were used. The polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) was incubated with primary antibody against phospho-Akt (Ser473) (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA), Akt (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA), phospho-p38-MAPK (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA), p38-MAPK (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA), β-actin (Santa Cruz Biotech), GluN2A (Santa Cruz Biotech), or GluN2B (Santa Cruz Biotech). Primary antibodies were labeled with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody, and protein bands were imaged using SuperSignal West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA). The EC3 Imaging System (UVP, LLC, Upland, CA) was used to obtained blot images directly from the polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. For the detection of total Akt, the same polyvinylidene difluoride membrane was stripped and then re-incubated with primary antibody against total Akt (Cell Signaling Technology). The quantification of Western blot data was performed using ImageJ software.
Neuronal viability assays
Double staining of propidium iodide (PI) and fluorescein diacetate (FDA) was performed to detect neuronal viability using a modified procedure47. Briefly, cultures were rinsed with extracellular solution and incubated with FDA (5 μM) and PI (2 μM) for 30 min. The cultures were washed with extracellular solution and then viewed on an Olympus fluorescent microscope (IX51, Olympus). Neuronal viability was determined by calculating the number of PI-labeled cells over FDA-labeled cells. The investigator for the cell count was blinded to the experimental treatment.
The lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is a cytoplasmic enzyme retained by viable cells with intact plasma membranes and released from cells with damaged membranes. The LDH release was measured using CytoTox 96 Cytotoxicity kit based on the manufacturer’s instructions (Promega, Madison, WI)27. The levels of maximal LDH release were measured by treating the cultures with 10× lysis solution (provided by the manufacturer) to yield complete lysis of the cells. Absorbance data were obtained using a 96-well plate reader (Molecular Devices, Palo Alto, CA) at 490 nm. According to the manufacturer’s instructions, the LDH release (%) was calculated by calculating the ratio of experimental LDH release to maximal LDH release.
Statistics
Student’s t test or ANOVA test was used where appropriate to examine the statistical significance of the differences between groups of data. Newman–Keuls tests were used for post-hoc comparisons when appropriate. All results are presented as mean ± SE. Significance was placed at p < 0.05.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Hu, R. et al. Glycine triggers a non-ionotropic activity of GluN2A-containing NMDA receptors to confer neuroprotection. Sci. Rep. 6, 34459; doi: 10.1038/srep34459 (2016).
Acknowledgments
We thank Drs. Gavin Rumbaugh, Jon Johnson, Thomas Kuner for providing us with cDNAs of GluN1, GluN2A, GluN2B and GluN1(N598Q). This work was supported by National Center for Research Resources (RR024210) of NIH, National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM103554) of NIH, National Institute of Neurological Disorders of NIH (R21NS077205), American Heart Association (12GRNT9560012), China Key Project of Basic Research (“973” Project; 2014CB541606), Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC; 81470599) and Fund of Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science to Q.W.
Footnotes
Author Contributions R.H., J.C., B.L., R.L., M.Z., Z.W., M.L. and Z.L. performed Western blot experiments. R.H. and J.C. wrote the draft of the paper. Y.W., H.L. and F.L. designed the experiments and performed cell death and survival assays. H.F. and Q.W. supervised the experiments and wrote the paper.
References
- Dingledine R., Borges K., Bowie D. & Traynelis S. F. The glutamate receptor ion channels. Pharmacol Rev 51, 7–61 (1999). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Monyer H. et al. Heteromeric NMDA receptors: molecular and functional distinction of subtypes. Science 256, 1217–1221 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson J. W. & Ascher P. Glycine potentiates the NMDA response in cultured mouse brain neurons. Nature 325, 529–531 (1987). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Malenka R. C. & Nicoll R. A. Long-term potentiation–a decade of progress? Science 285, 1870–1874 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barria A. & Malinow R. Subunit-specific NMDA receptor trafficking to synapses. Neuron 35, 345–353 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Constantine-Paton M., Cline H. T. & Debski E. Patterned activity, synaptic convergence, and the NMDA receptor in developing visual pathways. Annual review of neuroscience 13, 129–154 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kerchner G. A. & Nicoll R. A. Silent synapses and the emergence of a postsynaptic mechanism for LTP. Nature reviews. Neuroscience 9, 813–825 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Choi D. W. Glutamate neurotoxicity and diseases of the nervous system. Neuron 1, 623–634 (1988). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aarts M. et al. Treatment of ischemic brain damage by perturbing NMDA receptor- PSD-95 protein interactions. Science 298, 846–850 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martel M. A. et al. The subtype of GluN2 C-terminal domain determines the response to excitotoxic insults. Neuron 74, 543–556 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hayashi T., Thomas G. M. & Huganir R. L. Dual palmitoylation of NR2subunits regulates NMDA receptor trafficking. Neuron 64, 213–226 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim M. J., Dunah A. W., Wang Y. T. & Sheng M. Differential roles of NR2A- and NR2B-containing NMDA receptors in Ras-ERK signaling and AMPA receptor trafficking. Neuron 46, 745–760 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Loftis J. M. & Janowsky A. The N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunit NR2B: localization, functional properties, regulation, and clinical implications. Pharmacology & therapeutics 97, 55–85 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen M. et al. Differential roles of NMDA receptor subtypes in ischemic neuronal cell death and ischemic tolerance. Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation 39, 3042–3048 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ning K. et al. Dual neuroprotective signaling mediated by downregulating two distinct phosphatase activities of PTEN. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 24, 4052–4060 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Y. et al. NMDA receptor subunits have differential roles in mediating excitotoxic neuronal death both in vitro and in vivo. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 27, 2846–2857 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DeRidder M. N. et al. Traumatic mechanical injury to the hippocampus in vitro causes regional caspase-3 and calpain activation that is influenced by NMDA receptor subunit composition. Neurobiol Dis 22, 165–176 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anastasio N. C., Xia Y., O’Connor Z. R. & Johnson K. M. Differential role of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunits 2A and 2B in mediating phencyclidine-induced perinatal neuronal apoptosis and behavioral deficits. Neuroscience 163, 1181–1191 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vissel B., Krupp J. J., Heinemann S. F. & Westbrook G. L. A use-dependent tyrosine dephosphorylation of NMDA receptors is independent of ion flux. Nature neuroscience 4, 587–596 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nabavi S. et al. Metabotropic NMDA receptor function is required for NMDA receptor-dependent long-term depression. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110, 4027–4032 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kessels H. W., Nabavi S. & Malinow R. Metabotropic NMDA receptor function is required for beta-amyloid-induced synaptic depression. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110, 4033–4038 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tamburri A., Dudilot A., Licea S., Bourgeois C. & Boehm J. NMDA-receptor activation but not ion flux is required for amyloid-beta induced synaptic depression. PloS one 8, e65350 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Birnbaum J. H., Bali J., Rajendran L., Nitsch R. M. & Tackenberg C. Calcium flux-independent NMDA receptor activity is required for Abeta oligomer-induced synaptic loss. Cell death & disease 6, e1791 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stein I. S., Gray J. A. & Zito K. Non-Ionotropic NMDA Receptor Signaling Drives Activity-Induced Dendritic Spine Shrinkage. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 35, 12303–12308 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weilinger N. L. et al. Metabotropic NMDA receptor signaling couples Src family kinases to pannexin-1 during excitotoxicity. Nature neuroscience 19, 432–442 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luo H. R. et al. Akt as a mediator of cell death. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100, 11712–11717 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shan Y. et al. Regulation of PINK1 by NR2B-containing NMDA receptors in ischemic neuronal injury. Journal of neurochemistry 111, 1149–1160 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MacDonald J. F. & Nowak L. M. Mechanisms of blockade of excitatory amino acid receptor channels. Trends Pharmacol Sci 11, 167–172 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rosenmund C., Clements J. D. & Westbrook G. L. Nonuniform probability of glutamate release at a hippocampal synapse. Science 262, 754–757 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lu W. et al. Activation of synaptic NMDA receptors induces membrane insertion of new AMPA receptors and LTP in cultured hippocampal neurons. Neuron 29, 243–254 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Adler E. M., Augustine G. J., Duffy S. N. & Charlton M. P. Alien intracellular calcium chelators attenuate neurotransmitter release at the squid giant synapse. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 11, 1496–1507 (1991). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Flint A. C., Liu X. & Kriegstein A. R. Nonsynaptic glycine receptor activation during early neocortical development. Neuron 20, 43–53 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lynch J. W. Molecular structure and function of the glycine receptor chloride channel. Physiol Rev 84, 1051–1095 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu J. J., Qin Y., Zhao M., Van Aelst L. & Malinow R. Ras and Rap control AMPA receptor trafficking during synaptic plasticity. Cell 110, 443–455 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li L. L. et al. The nNOS-p38MAPK pathway is mediated by NOS1AP during neuronal death. J Neurosci 33, 8185–8201 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wan Q. et al. Recruitment of functional GABA(A) receptors to postsynaptic domains by insulin. Nature 388, 686–690 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burnashev N. et al. Control by asparagine residues of calcium permeability and magnesium blockade in the NMDA receptor. Science 257, 1415–1419 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Behe P. et al. Determination of NMDA NR1 subunit copy number in recombinant NMDA receptors. Proceedings. Biological sciences/The Royal Society 262, 205–213 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Single F. N. et al. Dysfunctions in mice by NMDA receptor point mutations NR1(N598Q) and NR1(N598R). The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 20, 2558–2566 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vignes M. & Collingridge G. L. The synaptic activation of kainate receptors. Nature 388, 179–182 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baptista V. & Varanda W. A. Glycine binding site of the synaptic NMDA receptor in subpostremal NTS neurons. Journal of neurophysiology 94, 147–152 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fischer G. et al. Ro 25-6981, a highly potent and selective blocker of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors containing the NR2B subunit. Characterization in vitro. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics 283, 1285–1292 (1997). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chang N. et al. Differential regulation of NMDA receptor function by DJ-1 and PINK1. Aging cell 9, 837–850 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oliet S. H. & Mothet J. P. Regulation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors by astrocytic D-serine. Neuroscience 158, 275–283 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Manning B. D. & Cantley L. C. AKT/PKB signaling: navigating downstream. Cell 129, 1261–1274 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burke R. E. Inhibition of mitogen-activated protein kinase and stimulation of Akt kinase signaling pathways: Two approaches with therapeutic potential in the treatment of neurodegenerative disease. Pharmacology & therapeutics 114, 261–277 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones K. H. & Senft J. A. An improved method to determine cell viability by simultaneous staining with fluorescein diacetate-propidium iodide. J Histochem Cytochem 33, 77–79 (1985). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee J. M., Zipfel G. J. & Choi D. W. The changing landscape of ischaemic brain injury mechanisms. Nature 399, A7–14 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koutsilieri E. & Riederer P. Excitotoxicity and new antiglutamatergic strategies in Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 13 Suppl 3, S329–331 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lipton S. A. Failures and successes of NMDA receptor antagonists: molecular basis for the use of open-channel blockers like memantine in the treatment of acute and chronic neurologic insults. NeuroRx 1, 101–110 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Steinberg G. K. et al. Narrow temporal therapeutic window for NMDA antagonist protection against focal cerebral ischaemia. Neurobiol Dis. 2, 109–118 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kemp J. A. & McKernan R. M. NMDA receptor pathways as drug targets. Nat 5, 1039–1042 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ikonomidou C. & Turski L. Why did NMDA receptor antagonists fail clinical trials for stroke and traumatic brain injury? Lancet 1, 383–386 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brewer G. J., Torricelli J. R., Evege E. K. & Price P. J. Optimized survival of hippocampal neurons in B27-supplemented Neurobasal, a new serum-free medium combination. J Neurosci Res 35, 567–576 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anegawa N. J. et al. N-Methyl-D-aspartate receptor mediated toxicity in nonneuronal cell lines: characterization using fluorescent measures of cell viability and reactive oxygen species production. Brain research. Molecular brain research 77, 163–175 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]