Skip to main content
PMC home page
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 1994 May;78(5):392–396. doi: 10.1136/bjo.78.5.392

A comparative study of the elastic properties of continuous tear curvilinear capsulorhexis versus capsulorhexis produced by radiofrequency endodiathermy.

J Luck 1, A K Brahma 1, B A Noble 1
PMCID: PMC504795  PMID: 8025075

Abstract

Capsulorhexis using radio-frequency endodiathermy may confer some advantages over continuous tear curvilinear capsulorhexis (CTCC) in certain clinical situations. It is unclear whether a capsulorhexis produced in this fashion has the clinically advantageous elasticity and resistance to tearing that a CTCC has been demonstrated to have. To investigate this, a test of capsular elasticity was carried out on pairs of eyes obtained from an eye bank, 42 eyes of 21 patients in total, using modified digital vernier calipers. One eye of each pair had a CTCC, the other a diathermy capsulorhexis (DC). The elasticity of the capsule in both groups was expressed by comparing the circumference of the capsulotomy at rest with its circumference at rupture. The mean capsular elasticity of the CTCC group was significantly greater than that of the DC group (p << 0.001). The capsular edge in both groups was examined using scanning electron microscopy, and the difference in morphology appears to be the source of the difference in elasticity.

Full text

PDF
392

Images in this article

393Image
on p.393
393Image
on p.393
394Image
on p.394
395Image
on p.395
395Image
on p.395
395Image
on p.395
396Image
on p.396

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Assia E. I., Apple D. J., Tsai J. C., Lim E. S. The elastic properties of the lens capsule in capsulorhexis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1991 May 15;111(5):628–632. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)73710-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Assia E. I., Apple D. J., Tsai J. C., Morgan R. C. Mechanism of radial tear formation and extension after anterior capsulectomy. Ophthalmology. 1991 Apr;98(4):432–437. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(91)32273-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barnard K., Burgess S. A., Carter D. A., Woolley D. M. Three-dimensional structure of type IV collagen in the mammalian lens capsule. J Struct Biol. 1992 Jan-Feb;108(1):6–13. doi: 10.1016/1047-8477(92)90002-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Davison J. A. Analysis of capsular bag defects and intraocular lens positions for consistent centration. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1986 Mar;12(2):124–129. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(86)80026-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Farnsworth P. N., Mauriello J. A., Burke-Gadomski P., Kulyk T., Cinotti A. A. Surface ultrastructure of the human lens capsule and zonular attachments. Invest Ophthalmol. 1976 Jan;15(1):36–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fisher R. F. Elastic constants of the human lens capsule. J Physiol. 1969 Mar;201(1):1–19. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fisher R. F. The influence of age on some ocular basement membranes. Eye (Lond) 1987;1(Pt 2):184–189. doi: 10.1038/eye.1987.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gassmann F., Schimmelpfennig B., Klöti R. Anterior capsulotomy by means of bipolar radio-frequency endodiathermy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1988 Nov;14(6):673–676. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(88)80040-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gimbel H. V., Neuhann T. Development, advantages, and methods of the continuous circular capsulorhexis technique. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990 Jan;16(1):31–37. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80870-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gimbel H. V. Two-stage capsulorhexis for endocapsular phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990 Mar;16(2):246–249. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80739-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Koch D. D., Liu J. F. Zonular encroachment on the anterior capsular zonular-free zone. Am J Ophthalmol. 1988 Oct 15;106(4):491–492. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(88)90892-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Krag S., Thim K., Corydon L. Strength of the lens capsule during hydroexpression of the nucleus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993 Mar;19(2):205–208. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80943-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Marshall G. E., Konstas A. G., Bechrakis N. E., Lee W. R. An immunoelectron microscope study of the aged human lens capsule. Exp Eye Res. 1992 Mar;54(3):393–401. doi: 10.1016/0014-4835(92)90051-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Marshall J., Beaconsfield M., Rothery S. The anatomy and development of the human lens and zonules. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1982;102(Pt 3):423–440. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pande M. Continuous curvilinear (circular) capsulorhexis and planned extracapsular cataract extraction--are they compatible? Br J Ophthalmol. 1993 Mar;77(3):152–157. doi: 10.1136/bjo.77.3.152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Straatsma B. R., Lightfoot D. O., Barke R. M., Horwitz J. Lens capsule and epithelium in age-related cataract. Am J Ophthalmol. 1991 Sep 15;112(3):283–296. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)76729-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Thim K., Krag S., Corydon L. Hydroexpression and viscoexpression of the nucleus through a continuous circular capsulorhexis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993 Mar;19(2):209–212. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80944-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Thim K., Krag S., Corydon L. Stretching capacity of capsulorhexis and nucleus delivery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1991 Jan;17(1):27–31. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80980-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES