Abstract
Retention indices for 79 alkyl-substituted polycyclic aromatic sulfur heterocycles (PASHs) were determined by using reversed-phase liquid chromatography (LC) on a monomeric and polymeric octadecylsilane (C18) stationary phase. Molecular shape parameters [length, breadth, thickness (T), and length-to-breadth ratio (L/B)] were calculated for all the compounds studied. Based on separations of isomeric methylated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on polymeric C18 phases, alkyl-substituted PASHs are expected to elute based on increasing L/B ratios. However, the correlation coefficients had a wide range of values from r = 0.43 to r = 0.93. Several structural features besides L/B ratios were identified to play an important role in the separation mechanism of PASHs on polymeric C18 phases. First, the location of the sulfur atom in a bay-like-region results in alkylated-PASHs being more retentive than non-bay-like-region alkylated-PASHs, and they elute later than expected based on L/B value. Second, the placement of the alkyl group in the k region of the structure resulted in a later elution than predicted by L/B. Third, highly nonplanar methyl-PASHs (i.e., 1-Me and 11-MeBbN12T) elute prior to the parent PASH (BbN12T).
Keywords: Retention indices, Reversed-phase liquid chromatography stationary phases, Molecular descriptors, Retention behavior, Polycyclic aromatic compounds, Alkyl-substituted polycyclic aromatic sulfur heterocycles
1. Introduction
Reversed-phase liquid chromatography (LC) on octadecyl (C18) stationary phases has been shown to provide excellent separations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) [1–6] and methyl-PAHs (MePAHs) [1, 2, 7]. Previous studies have demonstrated that not all C18 stationary phases provide the same selectivity for MePAHs [1, 7]. Wise et al. showed the excellent selectivity of polymeric C18 phases for separation of methyl-substituted phenanthrene (MePhe), pyrene (MePyr), fluoranthene (MeFlu), chrysene (MeChry), benzo[a]anthracene (MeBaA), benzo[c]phenanthrene (MeBcPhe) and benzo[a]pyrene (MeBaP) [1]. The type of the C18 phase, i.e., monomeric or polymeric, played an important role in the separations of the MePAHs. Typically, monomeric C18 phases are prepared by reaction of monofunctional silanes [7, 8] and polymeric C18 phases are prepared using trifunctional silanes in the presence of water which results in cross-linking to form silane polymers on the silica surface [8]. In general, the MePAH isomers were better resolved on the polymeric C18 phases than the monomeric C18 phases, and the elution order of MePAH isomers generally followed the increase of a molecular shape parameter denoted as length-to-breadth (L/B) ratio.
In a later study, Wise et al. investigated the LC separations of MeChry, methylperylene (MePer), and methylpicene (MePic) on 16 commercially available C18 columns [7]. Each of the columns were characterized using a standard reference material developed at the National Institute of Standard and Technology for testing the selectivity of LC columns (SRM 869b). Selectivity values for tetrabenzonaphthalene (TBN) and BaP (αTBN/BaP) were used to classify the type of C18 phases for PAH selectivity. Generally, αTBN/BaP) ≤1 represent polymeric C18 phases; αTBN/BaP in the range of 1.0 – 1.7 represent intermediate polymeric C18 phases; and values for αTBN/BaP ≥ 1.7 represent monomeric C18 phases. For the separation of MePAHs, Wise et al. [7] observed that isomers with some nonplanarity and small L/B values would elute prior to the parent PAH as the polymeric nature increases (αTBN/BaP decreases). The nonplanarity of these PAHs, which has since been characterized using a molecular shape parameter denoted as the thickness (T), is due to the presence of the methyl group in the bay-region of the PAH structure. Several publications have summarized the correlation between LC retention of PAHs and MePAHs on polymeric C18 phases with molecular shape parameters (L/B and T) [2, 4]. While the focus of this study was to evaluate only molecular shape parameters, quantitative structure-retention relationship (QSRR) technique has been shown to be useful for predicting the GC retention behavior of saturated S-heterocyclic compounds on standard nonpolar polydimethylsiloxane siloxane stationary phases [9].
In the current study, we investigate the LC separation of alkyl-substituted polycyclic aromatic sulfur heterocycles (PASHs), (see Fig. 1) on both monomeric and polymeric C18 stationary phases. In past decades, PASHs have received far less attention than PAHs despite their carcinogenic and mutagenic potential [9, 10] and their presence in air particulate matter [11, 12], sediments [13–15], coal liquids [16], diesel [15], heavy oil [17–21], crude oil [15, 18, 22–31], shale oil [16, 22, 32, 33], coal tar [22, 23, 29, 34–36], mussels [13, 14,], and fish [13, 14,]. In a previous study [37], we reported LC retention indices for 70 PASHs on both monomeric and polymeric C18 phases. In this study, LC retention indices were determined for 79 alkyl-substituted PASHs, and the correlation of retention on the polymeric C18 phase and PASH geometry (L/B and T) was investigated. Only two previous publications have reported the reversed-phase LC retention behavior of isomeric PASHs [2, 38], and there are no previous reports of LC retention index data for alkyl-substituted PASH.
Fig. 1.

Structures and substitution position numbering for the PASHs studied.
2. Material and methods
2.1. Chemicals
The following PAHs and PASHs were purchased from commercial sources with high purity (>95%): dibenzothiophene (DBT) (Acros Organics, Springfield, NJ); 1-, 2-, and 4-MeDBT, 2,8- DiMeDBT, 1,4,7-, 3,4,7-, 2,3,7-, 2,3,8-, 2,4,7-, 2,4,8-, 2,4,6,- and 1,3,7-TriMeDBT (Astec, Munster, Germany); 2-EtDBT, 3-EtDBT, and 4-EtDBT (Chiron AS, Trondheim, Norway); and BbN12T, BbN21T, BbN23T, benzo[a]anthracene (BaA), benzo[b]chrysene (BcC), and dibenzo[a,h]pyrene (DBahP) (BCR, Brussels, Belgium); naphthalene (Nap) and phenanthrene (Phe) (Fluka, Buchs, Switzerland). The remaining alkyl-substituted PASHs were synthesized in the laboratories of M.L.L. at Brigham Young University (Provo, UT). Standard Reference Material (SRM) 869b, “Column Selectivity Test Mixture for Liquid Chromatography” was obtained from the Office of Standard Reference Materials at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (Gaithersburg, MD, USA). HPLC grade acetonitrile was purchased from Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA, USA).
2.2. Molecular Descriptor Calculations
The molecular modeling programs and procedure for calculating the molecular shape parameters have been described in detail previously [2, 39]. Briefly, ChemDraw 3D software (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to draw the molecular structures of PASHs and converted into the mol file formats. Commercial molecular modeling programs (PC-Model and MMX, Serena Software, Bloomington, IN, USA) and algorithms were used for calculations of the molecular descriptors [length (L), breadth (B), thickness (T) and length-to-breadth ratio (L/B)].
2.3. Liquid chromatographic retention data
LC retention index values (log I) were calculated according to equation 1 with the following index markers: (2) Nap, (3) Phe, (4) BaA, (5) BbC, and (6) DBahP [3].
| (1) |
R is the corrected retention volume, x represents the solute, and n and n + 1 represent the lower and higher eluting PAH standards. Previous studies have investigated the retention behavior of PAHs on C18 stationary phase using log I values as their basis for retention indices [2, 38]. The log I values are based on three measurements obtained from reference standards. The precision (standard deviation) of the log I values was equal to or less than ± 0.02 log I units. Baseline resolution of two components is achieved with a difference of ~ 0.06 log I units on both the monomeric and polymeric C18 phase.
2.4. Instrumentation and chromatographic conditions
LC retention measurements were recorded using the same instrumentation described in a companion publication on LC separation of parent PASHs [37]. Separations were performed on monomeric (Agilent 5) and polymeric (Zorbax Eclipse PAH) C18 columns purchased from Agilent (Avondale, PA) with the following characteristics: 25 cm length, 4.6 mm diameter, and 5 μm average particle diameters. Table 1 lists the optimal separation and detection conditions for each isomer set. PASHs were detected using selected wavelengths that correspond to a compromise among the maximum absorbance wavelengths obtained from UV-vis spectroscopic analysis of pure standards. Except for MeTeP112T isomers, LC retention index data were obtained under isocratic conditions with 85/15 (v/v) acetonitrile-water as the mobile phase with a flow-rate of 1.0 mL/min. LC retention index data were obtained for the MeTeP112T using the conditions listed in Table 1.
Table 1.
LC conditions for separating individual groups of PASHs.
| Isomer Sets | Time (min) | ACN a (%, v/v) | H2O a (%, v/v) | Flow Rate (mL min−1) | λ (nm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Three-ring PASH | |||||
| MeDBT | 60.0 b | 50 | 50 | 1.5 | 234 |
| EtDBT | 15.0 b | 85 | 15 | 1.0 | 234 |
| DiMeDBT | 20.0 b | 85 | 15 | 1.0 | 234 |
| TriMeDBT | 0.0 | 75 | 25 | 1.0 | 234 |
| 30.0 | 100 | 0 | |||
| 50 | 100 | 0 | |||
| MeN12T | 20.0 b | 75 | 25 | 1.0 | 261 |
| MeN21T | 35.0 b | 85 | 15 | 0.25 | 261 |
| Four-ring PASH | |||||
| MeBbN12T | 50.0 b | 85 | 15 | 0.5 | 262 |
| MeBbN21T | 50.0 b | 85 | 15 | 1.0 | 254 |
| MeBbN23T | 85.0 b | 85 | 15 | 0.5 | 274 |
| Five-ring PASH | |||||
| MeTeP112T | 0.0 | 85 | 15 | 1.5 | 254 |
| 20.0 | 100 | 0 | |||
| 50.0 | 100 | 0 | |||
Volume Fraction
Isocratic conditions for the total run time.
3. Results and Discussion
Previous studies have shown that the retention behavior of methyl-substituted PAH isomers to be significantly different on monomeric and polymeric C18 phases [1, 2, 7]. In the present study, two commercially available C18 columns were selected and used to investigate the selectivity of 10 isomeric sets of alkyl-substituted PASHs. Previous studies from Sander and Wise [7, 42] have demonstrated the use of αTBN/BaP values to classify the C18 phases for PAH separations. The αTBN/BaP values for the monomeric and polymeric C18 phases used in this study are 1.97 and 0.49, respectively.
The molecular structures of the seven parent PASHs investigated in this study are shown in Fig. 1 with the numbering of the positions available for substitution. The molecular shape parameters (L, B, T, and L/B ratio) and retention indices (monomeric and polymeric C18) for the alkyl-substituted PASHs are summarized in Tables 2 and 3. Table 4 summarizes the regression calculations for the correlation of LC retention on the polymeric C18 phase with L/B ratio. The polymeric C18 phase was the only phase to demonstrate a good correlation and will be discussed in detail. Previous studies have used correlation coefficients (r) as a parameter for measuring the linear correlations for the retention of MePAHs on polymeric C18 phases and L/B [2,7]. The correlation coefficient demonstrates a more significant linear trend when close to 1. Instances where the correlation coefficient is not close to 1, the calculation of a t-test value is determinations using equation 2 for accessing if the correlation coefficient represents a significant linear trend [41]:
| (2) |
were n is the number of data points. The calculated texp value is compared to the tcrit value at the desired significance level based on the degrees of freedom (n − 2). A significant correlation does exist for the correlation coefficient if the texp is greater than the tcrit. These concepts will be applied in the following sections for discussing the correlations between the MePASHs retention on the polymeric C18 phase and L/B values. In cases were the correlation coefficients are found to not demonstrate a significant trend, data points are removed from the correlation plots to help investigate possible explanations.
Table 2.
LC retention indices and molecular shape parameters for the alkyl-substituted isomers of DBT, N12T, and N21T.
| Molecular Dimensions
|
Log I
|
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PASHs | L (Å) | W (Å) | T (Å) | L/B | Monomeric C18 | Polymeric C18 |
| DBT | 11.62 | 8.02 | 4.06 | 1.45 | 3.28 | 2.84 |
| 1-MeDBT | 11.25 | 8.57 | 4.24 | 1.31 | 3.54 | 3.26 |
| 2-MeDBT | 12.32 | 8.15 | 4.21 | 1.51 | 3.57 | 3.26 |
| 3-MeDBT | 12.74 | 8.01 | 4.21 | 1.59 | 3.64 | 3.43 |
| 4-MeDBT | 11.55 | 8.12 | 4.21 | 1.42 | 3.68 | 3.44 |
| 1-EtDBT | 11.23 | 9.35 | 4.24 | 1.20 | - a | - a |
| 2-EtDBT | 13.46 | 8.15 | 4.22 | 1.65 | 3.93 | 3.38 |
| 3-EtDBT | 13.68 | 8.02 | 4.23 | 1.71 | 4.00 | 3.56 |
| 4-EtDBT | 11.57 | 9.03 | 4.23 | 1.28 | 4.08 | 3.65 |
| 1,2-DiMeDBT | 12.28 | 8.52 | 4.36 | 1.44 | 4.01 | 3.63 |
| 1,3-DiMeDBT | 12.30 | 8.54 | 4.23 | 1.44 | 4.11 | 3.69 |
| 1,4-DiMeDBT | 11.58 | 9.24 | 4.23 | 1.25 | 4.16 | 3.72 |
| 1,6-DiMeDBT | 11.26 | 8.54 | 4.26 | 1.32 | 4.16 | 3.75 |
| 1,7-DiMeDBT | 12.33 | 8.54 | 4.23 | 1.44 | 4.10 | 3.72 |
| 1,8-DiMeDBT | 12.05 | 9.10 | 4.23 | 1.32 | 4.00 | 3.55 |
| 1,9-DiMeDBT | 11.42 | 9.03 | 5.21 | 1.26 | - a | - a |
| 2,3-DiMeDBT | 12.51 | 8.21 | 4.22 | 1.52 | 4.01 | 3.61 |
| 2,4-DiMeDBT | 11.96 | 8.94 | 4.23 | 1.34 | 4.17 | 3.70 |
| 2,6-DiMeDBT | 11.96 | 8.20 | 4.24 | 1.46 | 4.17 | 3.79 |
| 2,7-DiMeDBT | 13.08 | 8.20 | 4.21 | 1.60 | 4.12 | 3.75 |
| 2,8-DiMeDBT | 12.04 | 8.78 | 4.22 | 1.37 | 4.05 | 3.50 |
| 3,4-DiMeDBT | 12.67 | 8.05 | 4.26 | 1.57 | 4.10 | 3.85 |
| 3,6-DiMeDBT | 12.63 | 8.08 | 4.23 | 1.56 | 4.24 | 3.99 |
| 3,7-DiMeDBT | 13.80 | 7.99 | 4.22 | 1.73 | 4.19 | 3.96 |
| 4,6-DiMeDBT | 11.58 | 8.24 | 4.21 | 1.41 | 4.25 | 3.82 |
| 1,3,7-TriMeDBT | 13.46 | 8.57 | 4.24 | 1.57 | 4.66 | 4.21 |
| 1,4,7-TriMeDBT | 12.69 | 9.34 | 4.24 | 1.36 | 4.71 | 4.22 |
| 2,3,7-TriMeDBT | 13.76 | 8.13 | 4.23 | 1.69 | 4.56 | 4.15 |
| 2,3,8-TriMeDBT | 13.17 | 8.65 | 4.22 | 1.52 | 4.49 | 3.85 |
| 2,4,6-TriMeDBT | 12.26 | 8.72 | 4.22 | 1.41 | 4.75 | 4.14 |
| 2,4,7-TriMeDBT | 13.39 | 8.72 | 4.21 | 1.54 | 4.73 | 4.26 |
| 2,4,8-TriMeDBT | 12.49 | 8.95 | 4.22 | 1.40 | 4.65 | 3.98 |
| 3,4,7-TriMeDBT | 13.79 | 8.11 | 4.22 | 1.70 | 4.66 | 4.45 |
| N12T | 11.28 | 8.07 | 4.16 | 1.40 | 2.84 | 2.90 |
| 2-MeN12T | 12.40 | 8.05 | 4.33 | 1.54 | 3.59 | 3.44 |
| 3-MeN12T | 11.99 | 8.08 | 4.21 | 1.48 | - a | - a |
| 4-MeN12T | 11.26 | 9.19 | 4.20 | 1.23 | 3.48 | 3.30 |
| 5-MeN12T | 11.28 | 9.30 | 4.22 | 1.21 | 3.47 | 3.25 |
| 6-MeN12T | 11.46 | 8.07 | 4.23 | 1.42 | 3.45 | 3.30 |
| 7-MeN12T | 12.41 | 8.07 | 4.21 | 1.54 | 3.51 | 3.41 |
| 8-MeN12T | 11.50 | 8.53 | 4.21 | 1.35 | 3.42 | 3.23 |
| 9-MeN12T | 11.34 | 9.27 | 4.23 | 1.22 | 4.02 | 3.32 |
| N21T | 11.28 | 8.07 | 4.06 | 1.40 | 2.78 | 2.74 |
| 1-MeN21T | 11.01 | 8.91 | 4.23 | 1.24 | 3.30 | 3.15 |
| 2-MeN21T | 11.95 | 8.34 | 4.21 | 1.43 | 3.39 | 3.24 |
| 4-MeN21T | 11.04 | 8.81 | 4.21 | 1.25 | 3.38 | 3.23 |
| 5-MeN21T | 11.13 | 9.29 | 4.22 | 1.20 | 3.33 | 3.17 |
| 6-MeN21T | 11.28 | 8.06 | 4.21 | 1.40 | 3.29 | 3.20 |
| 7-MeN21T | 12.26 | 8.05 | 4.21 | 1.52 | 3.34 | 3.28 |
| 8-MeN21T | 11.70 | 8.42 | 4.21 | 1.39 | 3.27 | 3.12 |
| 9-MeN21T | 10.85 | 8.79 | 4.24 | 1.24 | 3.31 | 3.17 |
Reference standards was not available; therefore no measurements were obtained for these compounds.
Table 3.
LC retention indices and molecular shape parameters for the methyl isomers of BbN12T, BbN21T, BbN23T, and TeP112T.
| Molecular Dimensions
|
Log I
|
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PASHs | L (Å) | W (Å) | T (Å) | L/B | Monomeric C18 | Polymeric C18 |
| BbN12T | 12.72 | 9.31 | 4.06 | 1.37 | 4.00 | 3.75 |
| 1-MeBbN12T | 12.53 | 9.48 | 5.28 | 1.32 | 4.23 | 3.61 |
| 2-MeBbN12T | 12.57 | 9.91 | 4.21 | 1.27 | 4.44 | 3.98 |
| 3-MeBbN12T | 13.86 | 9.31 | 4.21 | 1.49 | 4.54 | 4.37 |
| 4-MeBbN12T | 13.58 | 9.32 | 4.22 | 1.46 | 4.52 | 4.28 |
| 5-MeBbN12T | 12.70 | 9.78 | 4.22 | 1.30 | 4.56 | 4.25 |
| 6-MeBbN12T | 12.71 | 10.5 | 4.21 | 1.22 | 4.68 | 4.32 |
| 8-MeBbN12T | 13.47 | 9.31 | 4.21 | 1.45 | 4.70 | 4.51 |
| 9-MeBbN12T | 13.82 | 9.31 | 4.21 | 1.48 | 4.64 | 4.43 |
| 10-MeBbN12T | 12.51 | 9.63 | 4.21 | 1.30 | 4.49 | 3.98 |
| 11-MeBbN12T | 12.53 | 9.36 | 4.99 | 1.34 | 4.37 | 3.73 |
| BbN21T | 13.66 | 8.13 | 4.06 | 1.68 | 4.13 | 4.22 |
| 1-MeBbN21T | 13.65 | 9.16 | 4.23 | 1.47 | 4.77 | 4.90 |
| 2-MeBbN21T | 13.62 | 8.75 | 4.21 | 1.56 | - a | - a |
| 3-MeBbN21T | 14.79 | 8.12 | 4.21 | 1.82 | 4.79 | 5.39 |
| 4-MeBbN21T | 13.89 | 8.11 | 4.23 | 1.71 | 4.75 | 5.27 |
| 5-MeBbN21T | 13.66 | 9.30 | 4.22 | 1.47 | 4.68 | 4.63 |
| 6-MeBbN21T | 13.66 | 9.35 | 4.29 | 1.46 | 4.74 | 4.78 |
| 7-MeBbN21T | 13.52 | 8.57 | 4.23 | 1.58 | 4.74 | 4.96 |
| 8-MeBbN21T | 14.21 | 8.19 | 4.21 | 1.74 | 4.75 | 5.06 |
| 9-MeBbN21T | 14.79 | 8.12 | 4.21 | 1.82 | 4.82 | 5.45 |
| 10-MeBbN21T | 13.62 | 8.42 | 4.21 | 1.62 | 4.84 | 4.97 |
| BbN23T | 13.90 | 8.17 | 4.06 | 1.70 | 4.05 | 4.05 |
| 1-MeBbN23T | 13.88 | 9.04 | 4.24 | 1.54 | 4.48 | 4.37 |
| 2-MeBbN23T | 14.33 | 8.75 | 4.21 | 1.64 | 4.75 | 4.36 |
| 3-MeBbN23T | 15.02 | 8.16 | 4.21 | 1.84 | 4.63 | 5.02 |
| 4-MeBbN23T | 13.89 | 8.17 | 4.20 | 1.70 | 4.71 | 5.22 |
| 6-MeBbN23T | 13.91 | 8.99 | 4.21 | 1.55 | 4.58 | 4.62 |
| 7-MeBbN23T | 13.95 | 8.38 | 4.22 | 1.67 | 4.49 | 4.48 |
| 8-MeBbN23T | 15.06 | 8.17 | 4.21 | 1.84 | 4.62 | 5.00 |
| 9-MeBbN23T | 14.77 | 8.20 | 4.21 | 1.80 | 4.59 | 4.70 |
| 10-MeBbN23T | 13.58 | 8.67 | 4.22 | 1.57 | 4.44 | 4.22 |
| 11-MeBbN23T | 13.74 | 8.64 | 4.24 | 1.59 | 4.51 | 4.56 |
| TeP112T | 13.64 | 9.32 | 4.05 | 1.46 | 5.03 | 4.83 |
| 1-MeTeP112T | 13.61 | 9.43 | 4.20 | 1.44 | 5.79 | 5.12 |
| 2-MeTeP112T | 14.76 | 9.32 | 4.20 | 1.59 | - a | - a |
| 3-MeTeP112T | 14.42 | 9.30 | 4.22 | 1.55 | 5.67 | 5.31 |
| 4-MeTeP112T | 13.38 | 9.90 | 4.21 | 1.35 | - a | - a |
| 5-MeTeP112T | 13.62 | 10.52 | 4.21 | 1.30 | 5.60 | 4.92 |
| 6-MeTeP112T | 13.63 | 9.34 | 4.23 | 1.46 | - a | - a |
| 7-MeTeP112T | 13.79 | 9.32 | 4.22 | 1.48 | 5.58 | 5.09 |
| 8-MeTeP112T | 14.77 | 9.32 | 4.21 | 1.59 | - a | - a |
| 9-MeTeP112T | 14.05 | 9.30 | 4.19 | 1.51 | 5.28 | 5.43 |
| 10-MeTeP112T | 13.22 | 9.42 | 4.23 | 1.40 | - a | - a |
Reference standards was not available; therefore no measurements were obtained for these compounds.
Table 4.
Correlation coefficients relating retention on the polymeric C18 phase versus L/B.
| PASHs | Number of PASHs | Equation | Correlation Coefficient | Degrees of Freedom | t-value, α = 0.05 | Significant | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| tcrit | texp | ||||||
| MeDBT | 4 | y = 0.36x + 2.82 | 0.43 | 2 | 4.30 | 0.68 | No |
| EtDBT | 3 | y = -0.39x + 4.14 | −0.66 | 1 | 12.71 | 1.23 | No |
| DiMeDBT | 15 | y = 0.64x + 2.81 | 0.60 | 13 | 2.18 | 2.70 | Yes |
| TriMeDBT | 8 | y = 0.60x + 3.25 | 0.43 | 6 | 2.45 | 1.17 | No |
| MeN12T | 7 | y = 0.11x + 3.21 | 0.75 | 5 | 2.57 | 2.55 | No |
| MeN21T | 8 | y = 0.25x + 2.87 | 0.54 | 6 | 2.45 | 1.58 | No |
| MeBbN12T | 10 | y = 1.54x + 2.06 | 0.50 | 8 | 2.31 | 1.62 | No |
| MeBbN21T | 9 | y = 1.74x + 2.20 | 0.93 | 7 | 2.36 | 6.65 | Yes |
| MeBbN23T | 10 | y = 1.98x + 1.35 | 0.71 | 8 | 2.31 | 2.87 | Yes |
| MeTe112T | 5 | y = 1.32x + 2.93 | 0.85 | 3 | 3.18 | 2.79 | No |
3.1. MeDBT and EtDBT
Fig. 2 shows the LC separation of DBT with the four possible MeDBT isomers and with three of the four possible EtDBT isomers on both C18 phases. In the case of MeDBT, all four isomers were separated (only partial resolution of the 3-Me and 4-Me) on the polymeric C18 phase; however, on the monomeric phase the 3-MeDBT and 4-MeDBT co-eluted. From the log I values for the MeDBTs (Table 2), which were determined from individual standard measurements, 3-MeDBT elutes before the 4-MeDBT demonstrating that the elution order is the same on both C18 phases. A similar elution order was observed for the EtDBT isomers on both C18 phases. In comparison to the separation of MeDBTs, the three EtDBTs were baseline resolved on both C18 phases under faster separation conditions.
Fig. 2.

LC separations of DBT with four MeDBT isomers and three EtDBT isomers on different C18 stationary phases: monomeric and polymeric.
With the exception of 4-Et and 4-MeDBT, the retention behavior of the alkyl-substituted isomers follows the increasing L/B values. The 4th substitution position (see Fig. 1) is located on the carbon closest to the sulfur atom creating a bay-like-region (see Fig. S1) on the structure. In a companion study [37] the LC retention behavior of the parent PASHs is reported, and this study demonstrated that the three- and four-ring unsubstituted PASHs eluted later than expected based on L/B when the sulfur atom was located in a bay-region of the structure. These observations suggest that when the sulfur atom is located in a bay-like-region, the sulfur atom is protected from from interacting with the stationary phase (C18). The correlation of retention for the MeDBT and EtDBT isomers on the polymeric C18 phase vs. L/B (see Table 4, Fig. S2) resulted in correlation coefficients of r = 0.43 and r = −0.67, respectively. The negative correlation coefficient for the EtDBT isomer group is a direct reflection of the isomer with the lowest L/B value (4-EtDBT = 1.28) eluting last in the separation. The correlation coefficients for the MeDBT and EtDBT isomers do not provide a significant linear trend based on the texp values of 0.68 (n = 4, α = 0.05, tcrit = 4.30) and 1.23 (n = 3, α = 0.05, tcrit = 12.71), respectively [41].
3.2. DiMeDBT
The LC separations for 15 of the 16 possible DiMeDBT isomers on the polymeric C18 phase is shown in Fig. 3A. Retention indices for both C18 phases are reported in Table 2. Complete LC separation of the fifteen DiMeDBT isomers was not achieved on either C18 phase. A plot of retention on the polymeric C18 phase vs. L/B for the 15 DiMeDBT isomers is shown in Fig. 3B with a correlation coefficient of r = 0.60. The texp value for the correlation coefficient was 2.70 (n = 15, α = 0.05, tcrit = 2.13) indicating that there is a significant linear trend between the retention on the polymeric C18 phase for DiMeDBT and L/B [41]. The correlation coefficient improves to r = 0.89 by removing the isomers containing one or two methyl groups located in substitution positions 4 or 6 next to the sulfur atom, which tend to elute later than predicted by L/B (see Section 3.1).
Fig. 3.

(A) LC separation of the 15 DiMeDBT isomers on the polymeric C18 phase. (B) Plot of retention (log I) on the polymeric C18 phase versus L/B value for the 15 DiMeDBT isomers. Numbers identify the DiMeDBT isomers.
3.3. TriMeDBT
The LC separations of DBT with 8 of the 28 possible TriMeDBT isomers on both monomeric and polymeric C18 phases are shown in Fig. 4. The polymeric C18 phase provided the most comprehensive separation of the eight TriMeDBT isomers with the co-elution of 1,3,7- and 1,4,7-TriMeDBT. The monomeric C18 phase had significantly more co-elution of the isomers: i.e.,2,4,8-, 1,3,7-, and 3,4,7-TriMeDBT and 2,4,7- and 2,4,6-TriMeDBT. The elution order for the TriMeDBT isomers is different on the two C18 phases with the exception of 2,3,8-TriMeDBT, which elutes first on both columns. As shown in Fig. S3, there is a low correlation between the L/B and the retention characteristics of the TriMeDBT isomers on the polymeric C18 phase with a correlation coefficient of r = 0.43. The texp value for the correlation coefficient was 1.17 (n = 8, α = 0.05, tcrit = 2.31) indicating that there is not a significant linear trend between the retention on the polymeric C18 phase for TriMeDBT and L/B [41]. The 20 missing isomers are needed to have a better understanding of the correlation between the retention of TriMeDBT and L/B.
Fig. 4.

LC separations of DBT with eight TriMeDBT isomers on different C18 stationary phases: monomeric and polymeric. Numbers identify the TriMeDBT isomers.
3.4. MeN12T and MeN21T
Fig. 5 shows the LC separations of N12T with seven of eight possible MeN12T isomers (Fig. 5A) and N21T with all eight possible MeN21T isomers (Fig. 5B). The polymeric phase provided the most comprehensive separation for both isomer sets. In the case of MeN12T isomers, the separation conditions resulted in only two co-eluting isomers (4-Me and 6-Me). The LC analysis of the MeN21T isomers resulted in co-elution of two pairs of isomers: 9-Me and 5-MeN21T and 4-Me and 2-MeN21T.
Fig. 5.

LC separations on the polymeric C18 phase of (A) N12T and seven MeN12T isomers and (B) N21T and eight MeN21T isomers. Numbers identify the positions of the methyl groups on the parent PASHs.
The correlations of LC retention on the polymeric C18 phase and L/B values for the MeN12T and MeN21T isomers is shown in Fig. S4A and S4B with correlation coefficients r = 0.75 and r = 0.54, respectively. The correlation coefficients for the MeN12T and MeN21T isomers do not provide a significant linear trend based on the texp values of 2.55 (n = 7, α = 0.05, tcrit = 2.36) and 1.58 (n = 8, α = 0.05, tcrit = 2.31), respectively [41]. The structures of N12T and N21T are identical except for the position of the sulfur atom in the heterocyclic ring. These similarities may account for the retention behavior of both isomer sets. In both cases, the isomers with the largest L/B values were 7-Me (1.54) and 2-MeN12T (1.54) isomers and 2-Me (1.43) and 7-MeN21T (1.52), and these two isomers elute last. However, in both cases the isomers with the smallest L/B values elute in the middle of the separation.
Phenanthrene (Phe) is the three-ring benzenoid PAH with a similar structure to both N12T and N21T. Previous work by Wise et al. evaluated the correlation between the retention of five MePhe isomers and their L/B values [2]. The correlation coefficient (r) and texp value was 0.88 and 3.24 (n = 5, α = 0.05, tcrit = 3.18), respectively, indicating that there is a significant linear trend between the retention on the polymeric C18 phase for MePhe and L/B [41]. The αTBN/BaP value for the polymeric C18 phase used during the MePhe isomer study was ~ 0.7. With the exception of 9-MePhe, the retention of the MePhe isomers follows the L/B trend. The methyl group in the structure of 9-MePhe is the only isomer to be located in the k region of the Phe structure. Similar results were observed in the present study for 4-Me and 5-Me isomers of N12T and N21T, which are located in the k region (Fig. S1) of the structure. The isomers with the methyl group located in the bay-region for N12T (9-Me) and N21T (1-Me and 9-Me) elute later than predicted by L/B. 4-MePhe has the methyl group located in the bay-region of the Phe structure but the same retention behavior was not observed on a polymeric C18 phase. This difference can be directly related to the nonplanarity of 4-MePhe (T = 4.69) in comparison to 9-MeN12T (T = 4.20), 1-MeN21T (T = 4.23), and 9-MeN21T (T = 4.24). In both isomer sets, the isomers with the methyl group closest to the sulfur atom (9-MeN12T and 4-MeN21T), simulating a bay-like-region, are retained on the polymeric C18 phase longer than expected based on L/B. When 9-MeN12T and 4-MeN21T are removed from the plots in Fig. S4, the correlation coefficients improve to r = 0.83 and r = 0.67, respectively. The new correlation coefficient for the MeN12T does provide a significant linear trend based on the texp value of 2.96 (n = 6, α = 0.05, tcrit = 2.45) [41]. However, the new correlation coefficient for the MeN21T does not provide a significant linear trend based on the texp value of 2.02 (n = 7, α = 0.05, tcrit = 2.36) [41] because of the unexpected early elution of 8-MeN21T for no obvious reason.
3.5. MeBbN12T
The LC separation of BbN12T and 10 MeBbN12T isomers is shown in Fig. 6A. The polymeric C18 phase provided the most comprehensive separation of the MeBbN12T isomers with co-elution of only 2-Me and 10-MeBbN12T. The analysis of the 10 BbN12T isomers on the monomeric C18 phase only provided chromatographic separation of 3 MeBbN12T isomers (data not shown). Interestingly, 1-MeBbN12T and 11-MeBbN12T elute prior to BbN12T on the polymeric C18 phase. This retention behavior can be attributed to the nonplanarity of 1-Me and 11-MeBbN12T due to steric hindrance effects of the methyl substitution as indicated by the larger T values (1-Me and 11-Me; T = 5.28 and T = 4.99, respectively). The majority of the methyl-substituted PASH isomers have similar T values (T = 4.20, Table 2 and 3) indicating planar molecular structures. The behavior of methyl isomers eluting prior to the parent on polymeric C18 phases was reported for selected PAHs by Wise et al. [7].
Fig. 6.
LC separations on the polymeric C18 phase of (A) BbN12T with ten MeBbN12T isomers, (B) BbN21T with nine MeBbN21T isomers, and (C) BbN23T with ten MeBbN23T isomers. Numbers identify the positions of the methyl groups on the parent PASHs.
Gas chromatography (GC) selectivity studies by Mössner et al. observed similar behavior for the MeBbN12T isomers on a liquid crystalline stationary phase, which also provides a separation based on the shape of the solute [36]. A plot of GC retention vs. L/B for the MeBbN12T isomers had a correlation coefficient of r = 0.73 [36]. The correlation coefficient improves to r = 0.89 when 1-Me and 11-MeBbN12T are removed from the plot. Benzo[c]phenanthrene (BcPhe) is the fourring benzenoid PAH with a structure similar to BbN12T. As with the earlier discussion regarding Phe, Wise et al. evaluated the correlation between the LC retention of the six possible MeBcPhe isomers on a polymeric C18 phase and their L/B values [2]. In the case of MeBcPhe isomers, 1-MeBcPhe (T = 5.94) elutes closely to BcPhe (T = 4.99) on a polymeric C18 phase with a αTBN/BaP value of ~0.7.
Fig. 7A shows the plot of LC retention on the polymeric phase vs. L/B for the 10 MeBbN12T isomers with a correlation coefficient of r = 0.50. The texp value for this correlation coefficient was 1.63 (n = 10, α = 0.05, tcrit = 2.23) indicating that there is not a significant linear trend between the retention on the polymeric C18 phase for TriMeDBT and L/B [41]. This low correlation coefficient can be partially attributed to the 1-Me and 11-MeBbN12T isomers eluting earlier than predicted by the L/B ratio. The correlation coefficient slightly improves to r = 0.63 and the texp value = 1.97 (n = 8, α = 0.05, tcrit = 2.31) when 1-Me and 11-MeBbN12T are removed from the plot in Fig. 7A, indicating that other separation factors are contributing to deviations from the expected L/B trend. 6-Me and 8-MeBbN12T (L/B = 1.22 and 1.45, respectively), with the methyl group located near the sulfur atom in the heterocyclic ring (bay-like-region), elute later than predicted by L/B. When these two isomers are also removed from the plot in Fig. 7A, correlation coefficient improves to r = 0.86 and the texp value = 3.67 (n = 6, α = 0.05, tcrit = 2.45) indicating a significant linear trend.
Fig. 7.

Plots of retention (log I) on the polymeric C18 phase versus L/B value for (A) ten MeBbN12T, (B) nine MeBbN21T, and (C) ten MeBbN23T. Numbers identify the positions of the methyl groups on the parent PASHs.
3.6. MeBbN21T
LC separation of BbN21T with 9 of 10 possible MeBbN21T isomers on the polymeric C18 phase is shown in Fig. 6B. The polymeric C18 phase provided baseline separation of the nine MeBbN21T isomers except for 7-Me and 10-MeBbN21T. The monomeric C18 phase only provided baseline resolution of one MeBbN21T isomer (5-MeBbN21T, data not shown). The correlation of LC retention on the polymeric phase and L/B value for the MeBbN21T isomers is shown in Fig. 7B with a correlation coefficient of r = 0.93, which represents the highest correlation among all of the isomer groups studied. The texp value for this correlation coefficient was 6.65 (n = 9, α = 0.05, tcrit = 2.36) indicating that there is a significant linear trend between the retention on the polymeric C18 phase for MeBbN21T and L/B [41]. 1-MeBbN21T provides the most protection of the sulfur atom in the heterocyclic ring and 5-Me and 6-Me are located in the k region of the structure. Based on previous discussions, these structural isomers would have been expected to elute later in the chromatogram. Chrysene (Chry) is the four-ring benzenoid PAH with a structure similar to BbN21T. The separation of the six possible MeChry isomers on a polymeric phase (αTBN/BaP ~ 0.7) provided an excellent correlation between their retention and L/B (r = 0.99) [2]. For both the MeChry and MeBbN21T isomers, the structure isomers with the methyl group located in the k region (5-Me and 6-MeChr/BbN21T) and bay region (4-Me and 5-MeChr and 1- MeBbN21T) have similar elution order.
3.7. MeBbN23T
The LC separation of BbN23T and the 10 possible MeBbN23T isomers on the polymeric C18 phase is shown in Fig. 6C. Unfortunately, some of the reference compounds of the MeBbN23T isomers contained impurities (*). The polymeric phase provided a separation of MeBbN23T isomers with only two pairs of co-eluting isomers. On the monomeric phase (see Table 3, 1-MeBbN23T is the only isomer to have a significant change in elution order in comparison to the polymeric C18 phase. The plot of retention on the polymeric phase vs. L/B value is shown in Fig. 7C with a correlation coefficient of r = 0.71. The texp value for this correlation coefficient was 2.87 (n = 10, α = 0.05, tcrit = 2.31) indicating that there is a significant linear trend between the retention on the polymeric C18 phase for MeBbN23T and L/B [41]. 1-Me (1.54), 6-Me (1.55), and 10-MeBbN23T (1.57) have the smallest L/B values of the 10 isomers but 6-MeBbN23T elutes later than expected. The late elution of 6-MeBbN23T can be explained based on previous discussions about the position of the methyl groups. This explanation is further illustrated by 4-MeBbN23T, which elutes last, even though based on L/B value (1.70) this isomer would be expected to elute before 9-Me (1.80), 8-Me (1.84), and 3-MeBbN23T (1.84).
3.8. MeTeP112T
The LC separation and retention vs. L/B plot for 5 of 10 possible MeTeP112T isomers on the polymeric C18 phase are shown in Fig. 8. This isomer group is the only group of peri-condensed PASHs. In comparison to the monomeric phase (data not shown), the polymeric phase provided the best separation with only minimal co-elution of 7-Me and 1-MeTeP112T. The plot of retention on the polymeric phase vs. L/B value is shown in Fig. 8 with a correlation coefficient of r = 0.85. However, the texp value for this correlation coefficient was 2.79 (n = 5, α = 0.05, tcrit = 3.18) indicating that there is not a significant linear trend between the retention on the polymeric C18 phase for the 5 MeTeP112T isomers and L/B [41]. The 5 missing isomers are needed to have a better understanding of the correlation between the retention of MeTeP112T and L/B. Benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) is the five-ring benzenoid PAH with a structure similar to TeP112T. The separation of the twelve possible MeBaP isomers on a polymeric phase (αTBN/BaP ~ 0.7) provided a correlation coefficient of r = 0.81 between their retention and L/B [2]. The texp value for this correlation coefficient was 4.48 (n = 12, α = 0.05, tcrit = 2.23) indicating that there is a significant linear trend between the retention on the polymeric C18 phase for MeBaP and L/B [41].
Fig. 8.

LC separations of TeP112T with five MeTeP112T isomers on a polymeric C18 phases and their plot of retention (log I) versus L/B value for the 5 MeTeP112T isomers. Numbers identify the positions of the methyl groups on the parent PASHs.
4. Conclusion
The LC retention behavior of 79 alkylated PASHs on monomeric and polymeric C18 stationary phases is reported and represent the most extensive characterization of the LC retention behavior of alkyl-substituted PASHs ever reported. Similar to the behavior of alkylated-PAHs, the separation of alkylated PASHs was more selective on a polymeric C18 phase compared to a monomeric C18 phase. Correlation coefficients for PASH retention vs. L/B ranged from r = 0.43 (MeDBT) to r = 0.93 (MeBbN21T). Correlations between the L/B of alkyl-substituted PASHs and retention on the polymeric C18 phase were similar to methyl-substituted PAHs; however, other structure features were found to have an impact on the separation of alkylated-PASHs. Alkyl-substituted PASHs eluted later than predicted based on L/B if the alkyl-substituted PASH structure had the following features: (1) the sulfur atom was located in a bay-like-region or (2) alkyl group substitution was in the k region. Lastly, when the alkyl-substituted PASHs have a high degree of nonplanarity (1-Me and 11-MeBbN12T), they eluted prior to the parent PASH.
Supplementary Material
Footnotes
Disclaimer
Certain commercial equipment or materials are identified in this paper to specify adequately the experimental procedure. Such identification does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor does it imply that the materials or equipment identified are necessarily the best available for the purpose.
References
- 1.Wise S, Bonnett WJ, Guenther FR, May WE. A Relationship Between Reversed-Phase C18 Liquid Chromatographic Retention and the Shape of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. J Chromatogr Sci. 1981;19:457–465. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wise SA, Sander LC. In: Chromatographic Separations Based on Molecular Recognition. Jinno K, editor. Wiley-VCH; New York, NY: 1997. pp. 1–64. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wise SA, Benner BA, Liu H, Byrd GD, Colmsjö A. Separation and identification of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon isomers of molecular weight 302 in complex mixtures. Anal Chem. 1988;60:630–637. doi: 10.1021/ac00158a006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sander LC, Wise SA. Shape selectivity in reversed-phase liquid chromatography for the separation of planar and non-planar solutes. J Chromatogr A. 1993;656:335–351. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sander LC, Wise SA. Influence of Stationary Phase Chemistry on Shape Recognition in Liquid Chromatography. Anal Chem. 1995;67:3284–3292. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sander LC, Pursch M, Wise SA. Shape Selectivity for Constrained Solutes in Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography. Anal Chem. 1999;71:4821–4830. doi: 10.1021/ac9908187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wise SA, Sander LC, Lapouyade R, Garrigues P. Anomalous behavior of selected methyl-substituted polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in reversed-phase liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A. 1990;514:111–122. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sander LC, Wise SA. Synthesis and characterization of polymeric C18 stationary phases for liquid chromatography. Anal Chem. 1984;56:504–510. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Farkas O, Héberger K, Zenkevich IG. Quantitative structure-retention relationships XIV Prediction of gas chromatogrpahic retention indices for saturated O-,N-, and S-heterocyclic compounds. Chemom Intell Lab Syst. 2004;72:173–184. [Google Scholar]
- 10.McFall T, Booth GM, Lee ML, Tominaga Y, Pratap R, Tedjamulia M, Castle RN. Mutagenic activity of methyl-substituted tri-and tetracyclic aromatic sulfur heterocycles. Mut Res Gen Toxicol. 1984;135:97–103. doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(84)90161-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pelroy RA, Stewart DL, Tominaga Y, Iwao M, Castle RN, Lee ML. Microbial mutagenicity of 3- and 4-ring polycyclic aromatic sulfur heterocycles. Mut Res Gen Toxicol. 1983;117:31–40. doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(83)90150-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lee ML, Novotny M, Bartle KD. Gas chromatography/mass spectrometric and nuclear magnetic resonance determination of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in airborne particulates. Anal Chem. 1976;48:1566–1572. doi: 10.1021/ac50005a037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wise SA, Benner BA, Chesler SN, Hilpert LR, Vogt CR, May WE. Characterization of the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from two standard reference material air particulate samples. Anal Chem. 1986;58:3067–3077. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Paasivirta J, Herzschuh R, Lahtiperä M, Pellinen J, Sinkkonen S. Oil residues in Baltic sediment, mussel and fish. I. Development of the analysis methods. Chemosphere. 1981;10:919–928. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Paasivirta J, Kääriäinen H, Lahtiperä M, Pellinen J, Sinkkonen S. Oil residues in Baltic sediment, mussel and fish. II. Study of the Finnish Archipelago 1979–1981. Chemosphere. 1982;11:811–821. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yang C, Zhang G, Wang Z, Yang Z, Hollebone B, Landriault M, Shah K, Brown CE. Development of a methodology for accurate quantitation of alkylated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in petroleum and oil contaminated environmental samples. Anal Methods. 2014;6:7760–7771. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nishioka M, Bradshaw JS, Lee ML, Tominaga Y, Tedjamulia M, Castle RN. Capillary column gas chromatography of sulfur heterocycles in heavy oils and tars using a biphenyl polysiloxane stationary phase. Anal Chem. 1985;57:309–312. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Nolte T, Posch TN, Huhn C, Andersson JT. Desulfurized Fuels from Athabasca Bitumen and Their Polycyclic Aromatic Sulfur Heterocycles. Analysis Based on Capillary Electrophoresis Coupled with TOF MS. Energy Fuels. 2013;27:97–107. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Moustafa NE, Andersson JT. Analysis of polycyclic aromatic sulfur heterocycles in Egyptian petroleum condensate and volatile oils by gas chromatography with atomic emission detection. Fuel Process Technol. 2011;92:547–555. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Machado ME, Bregles LP, de Menezes EW, Caramão EB, Benvenutti EV, Zini CA. Comparison between pre-fractionation and fractionation process of heavy gas oil for determination of sulfur compounds using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography. J Chromatogr A. 2013;1274:165–172. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mahé L, Dutriez T, Courtiade M, Thiébaut D, Dulot H, Bertoncini F. Global approach for the selection of high temperature comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography experimental conditions and quantitative analysis in regards to sulfur-containing compounds in heavy petroleum cuts. J Chromatogr A. 2011;1218:534–544. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.11.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Schmid B, Andersson JT. Critical Examination of the Quantification of Aromatic Compounds in Three Standard Reference Materials. Anal Chem. 1997;69:3476–3481. doi: 10.1021/ac970194+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zeigler C, Schantz M, Wise SA, Robbat A., Jr Mass Spectra and Retention Indexes for Polycyclic Aromatic Sulfur Hetrocycles and Some Alkylated Analogs. Poly Arom Cmpd. 2012;32:154–176. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lababidi S, Panda SK, Andersson JT, Schrader W. Direct Coupling of Normal-Phase High-Performance Liquid Chromatography to Atmospheric Pressure Laser Ionization Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometry for the Characterization of Crude Oil. Anal Chem. 2013;85:9478–9485. doi: 10.1021/ac400670s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Otto S, Streibel T, Erdmann S, Sklorz M, Schulz-Bull D, Zimmermann R. Application of pyrolysis–mass spectrometry and pyrolysis–gas chromatography–mass spectrometry with electron-ionization or resonance-enhanced-multi-photon ionization for characterization of crude oils. Anal Chim Acta. 2015;855:60–69. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2014.11.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hegazi AH, Fathalla EM, Andersson JT. Weathering trend characterization of medium-molecular weight polycyclic aromatic disulfur heterocycles by Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry. Chemosphere. 2014;111:266–271. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.04.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rudzinski WE, Rai V. Detection of Polyaromatic Sulfur Heterocycles in Crude Oil Using Postcolumn Addition of Tropylium and Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Energy Fuels. 2005;19:1611–1618. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Panda SK, Schrader W, al-Hajji A, Andersson JT. Distribution of Polycyclic Aromatic Sulfur Heterocycles in Three Saudi Arabian Crude Oils as Determined by Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometry. Energy Fuels. 2007;21:1071–1077. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zeigler CD, Robbat A., Jr Comprehensive Profiling of Coal Tar and Crude Oil to Obtain Mass Spectra and Retention Indices for Alkylated PAH Shows Why Current Methods Err. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46:3935–3942. doi: 10.1021/es2030824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hegazi AH, Andersson JT, El-Gayar MS. Application of gas chromatography with atomic emission detection to the geochemical investigation of polycyclic aromatic sulfur heterocycles in Egyptian crude oils. Fuel Process Technol. 2004;85:1–19. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Nocun M, Andersson JT. Argentation chromatography for the separation of polycyclic aromatic compounds according to ring number. J Chromatogr A. 2012;1219:47–53. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2011.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mössner SG, Wise SA. Determination of Polycyclic Aromatic Sulfur Heterocycles in Fossil Fuel-Related Samples. Anal Chem. 1999;71:58–69. doi: 10.1021/ac980664f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Andersson JT, Schmid B. Polycyclic aromatic sulfur heterocycles IV. Determination of polycyclic aromatic compounds in a shale oil with the atomic emission detector. J Chromatogr A. 1995;693:325–338. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wise SA, Poster DL, Leigh SD, Rimmer CA, Mossner S, Schubert P, Sander LC, Schantz MM. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in a coal tar standard reference material-SRM 1597a updated. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2010;398:717–728. doi: 10.1007/s00216-010-4008-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Antle P, Zeigler C, Robbat A., Jr Retention behavior of alkylated polycyclic aromatic sulfur heterocycles on immobilized ionic liquid stationary phases. J Chromatogr A. 2014;1361:255–264. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Mössner SG, Lopez de Alda MJ, Sander LC, Lee ML, Wise SA. Gas chromatographic retention behavior of polycyclic aromatic sulfur heterocyclic compounds, (dibenzothiophene, naphtho[b]thiophenes, benzo[b]naphthothiophenes and alkyl-substituted derivatives) on stationary phases of different selectivity. J Chromatogr A. 1999;841:207–228. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wilson WB, Sander LC, Lee ML, Wise SA. Retention behavior of isomeric polycyclic aromatic sulfur heterocycles in reversed-phase liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2016.07.064. in preparation. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wise SA, Campbell RM, May WE, Lee ML, Castle RN. In: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Seventh International Symposium. Cooke M, Dennis AJ, editors. Battelle Press; Columbus, OH: 1983. pp. 1247–1266. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sander LC, Wise SA. NIST Special Publication. Washington, DC: 1997. PAH Structure Index; p. 922. ( http://ois.nist.gov/cfdocs/nistpubs/sp/922/) [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sander LC, Wise SA. Determination of column selectivity toward polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. J High Resolut Chromatogr. 1988;11:383–387. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Miller MJ, Miler JC. Statistics and Chemometrics for Analytical Chemistry. 6. Pretice-Hall, Inc; New York: 2000. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

