Summary
Courtship in Drosophila melanogaster offers a powerful experimental paradigm for the study of innate sexually dimorphic behaviors [1, 2]. Fruit fly males exhibit an elaborate courtship display toward a potential mate [1, 2]. Females never actively court males, but their response to the male’s display determines whether mating will actually occur. Sex-specific behaviors are hardwired into the nervous system via the actions of the sex determination genes doublesex (dsx) and fruitless (fru) [1]. Activation of male-specific dsx/fru+ P1 neurons in the brain initiates the male’s courtship display [3, 4], suggesting that neurons unique to males trigger this sex-specific behavior. In females, dsx+ neurons play a pivotal role in sexual receptivity and post-mating behaviors [1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]. Yet it is still unclear how dsx+ neurons and dimorphisms in these circuits give rise to the different behaviors displayed by males and females. Here, we manipulated the function of dsx+ neurons in the female brain to investigate higher-order neurons that drive female behaviors. Surprisingly, we found that activation of female dsx+ neurons in the brain induces females to behave like males by promoting male-typical courtship behaviors. Activated females display courtship toward conspecific males or females, as well other Drosophila species. We uncovered specific dsx+ neurons critical for driving male courtship and identified pheromones that trigger such behaviors in activated females. While male courtship behavior was thought to arise from male-specific central neurons, our study shows that the female brain is equipped with latent courtship circuitry capable of inducing this male-specific behavioral program.
Highlights
-
•
Activation of brain dsx-pC1 neurons promote male-like courtship in females
-
•
Activated females court conspecific males and females and other Drosophila species
-
•
Methyl pheromones trigger male courtship behaviors in activated females
-
•
The female brain is equipped with latent circuitry underlying male-like behavior
Rezával et al. found that activation of specific neurons in the brain induces female fruit flies to display male-like courtship behaviors and identified pheromones that induce such behaviors. Thus, this study shows that the female fly brain is equipped with latent courtship circuitry that is capable of inducing a male-specific behavioral program.
Results and Discussion
Brain-Restricted Activation of dsx+ Neurons Induces Male Courtship Behaviors in Females
dsx is expressed in ∼50 neurons in the brain and ∼310 neurons in the ventral nerve cord (VNC) of females [5, 10, 11, 12]. To specifically assess the role of brain dsx+ neurons in specifying female sexual behavior, we employed an intersectional approach, described in Figure 1A. We combined a dsx-specific Gal4 driver (dsxGal4) [5] and a brain-specifically expressed flippase recombinase (Otd-FLP) [13] with a Gal4/FLP-responsive reporter or effector. These dsx∩Otd intersected females (dsxbrain>mGFP) showed the typical dsx expression pattern in the brain but no expression in the VNC (Table S1; Figure 1B).
We assessed the behavioral effects of specifically activating brain dsx+ neurons by expressing the heat-activated ion channel TrpA1, which induces depolarization when the temperature is increased above 25°C [14]. We paired a dsxbrain>TrpA1 virgin female with a wild-type male at 22°C or 33°C (Figure 1C). At 22°C, dsxbrain>TrpA1 virgin females behaved normally, with males actively courting them (Figure 1D; Movie S1). Surprisingly, when thermally activated (at 33°C), dsxbrain>TrpA1 virgin females showed male-typical behaviors toward males (Figures 1E and S1; Movie S2). While wild-type D. melanogaster females never display male courtship behaviors, we found that dsxbrain>TrpA1 females spend ∼50% of their time courting males, performing the first steps of the behavioral ritual, such as following and tapping the target fly, as well as extending one or two wings (Figure S1). Activated females, however, did not engage in licking or abdominal bending associated with attempted copulation. Interestingly, most males targeted by the activated females showed greatly reduced levels of courtship and instead attempted to escape the female’s advances (Figures 1E and S1; Movie S2). dsxbrain>TrpA1 females were also attracted to wild-type females (Movie S3), showing no sex-specific bias in their behavioral response, as they spent a similar amount of time courting each sex in a preference assay (Figure 1F).
Activation of dsx+ Neurons in the Female Brain Evokes Male-like Courtship Song
During courtship, D. melanogaster males vibrate one wing at a time producing a species-specific song that increases female receptivity [15, 16]. We thus tested whether dsxbrain>TrpA1 females are capable of producing male-like courtship song. Audio recordings from activated females paired with wild-type males or females showed characteristic acoustic features of male-like courtship song (shown in Figure 2A), including sine and pulse episodes (Figures 2B and 2C). How similar is activated female song to wild-type male song? The two have similar pulse and sine song frequency (Figures 2D and 2F) and number of cycles per pulse (Figure 2E). However, the inter-pulse interval (IPI), a species-specific parameter [16], was higher in activated female song than in wild-type male song (Figure 2G). We next quantified song events and examined bout structure in dsxbrain>TrpA1 females. We found that activated females sing less song than males; both the number of sine bouts per minute and the duration of sine bouts were significantly reduced when compared to males (Figures S2D and S2E). Although the number of pulse bouts per minute did not differ between activated females and wild-type males (Figure S2F), the duration of pulse bouts was significantly shorter in females (Figure S2G). Thus, dsxbrain>TrpA1 females display male-like pulse and sine song, albeit at much reduced levels compared to males. This is not surprising as male-specific fru+ and dsx+ neurons in the thorax contribute to song production [3, 17, 18]. In addition, a DsxM-dependent sexually dimorphic muscle is required for the production of robust sine song [17]. Photoactivation of fru+ neurons in the thorax of headless females has previously been shown to elicit courtship song [19], leading to speculation that the motor program for song is present in females but lies dormant, because the neural commands in the brain required for song initiation are absent [3, 19]. In contrast, our data demonstrate that females possess brain neurons that, when activated, trigger song, as well as other male-like courtship behaviors.
dsx-pC1 Neurons Induce Male-Typical Courtship Behaviors in Females
dsx+ neurons in the female brain are distributed in discrete clusters: pC1, pC2, pC3 (also known as pCd [7]) and aDN [5, 10, 11, 12] (Figure 3A). As the female pC1 cluster is anatomically homologous to the male pC1 cluster [20], which includes the fru+ courtship promoting P1 neurons [3, 4, 21, 22], we reasoned that this cluster may be responsible for the activation of male-typical courtship behaviors in dsxbrain>TrpA1 females. To test this hypothesis, we exploited intersectional methods [5, 7, 8, 20, 23] to target distinct dsx+ neuronal clusters in the female brain (Figures 3A and 3B; Table S1). We first visualized intersected dsx+ neurons in the female and male nervous system (Figure 3B; Table S1). We next used these restricted lines to express TrpA1 to test whether activating distinct dsx+ clusters drives male-like courtship behaviors in females (Figure 3C). We found that females only displayed male-like courtship behaviors toward males in strains that intersected four or more pC1 neurons per hemisphere. In contrast, females in which the majority of pC2 neurons or pC3 neurons are artificially activated did not show male-like behaviors. The clearest role for pC1 neurons in inducing male-like behaviors was seen in dsx∩71G01 females, where only four pC1 neurons are activated; these females showed high levels of courtship when paired with a wild-type male (∼50%; Figure 3C), displaying following, tapping, and wing extension behaviors (Figure S3A).
Activating the homologous neurons in dsx∩71G01>TrpA1 males also triggered courtship behaviors (Figures S3B and S3C), consistent with previous findings [6, 20]. Unlike the corresponding females, these males display courtship behaviors in the presence or absence of a male or female, and at lower activating temperatures (30 versus 32°C; Figures S3J and S3K). Note that males have more pC1 neurons labeled by dsx∩71G01 than females (∼17 versus approximately four neurons per brain hemisphere, respectively) (Table S1; Figures S3F–S3I), consistent with previous findings [7]. pC1 neurons in dsx∩71G01 males include both dsx+/fru− neurons and fru+/dsx+ P1 neurons (data not shown), while pC1 neurons in females are all dsx+/fru− [7, 9, 10] and are thus distinct from the fru/dsx+ P1 subgroup in males. Thus, artificial activation of sexually dimorphic dsx-pC1 neurons promotes male courtship behaviors in both sexes.
Volatile Compounds Induce Male Courtship Behaviors in Females
In contrast to dsxbrain>TrpA1 males, dsxbrain>TrpA1 females do not show courtship behaviors at 33°C in isolation (data not shown), suggesting that activated females require additional sensory cues provided by another fly to trigger courtship behaviors. To identify such sensory cues, we disrupted individual sensory modalities known to stimulate courtship behavior in males, in dsxbrain>TrpA1 females [2, 24] (Figure 4A). To block vision in general, we paired dsxbrain>TrpA1 females with headless males in the dark. To block gustation, we removed the females’ labella or front legs. To block audition, we removed the females’ aristae. In all of these cases, dsxbrain>TrpA1 females still showed male-like courtship behaviors (Figure 4B). In contrast, when we blocked olfaction by removing the antennae, the dsxbrain>TrpA1 females did not court, suggesting that olfactory cues contribute to the induction of male-like behaviors (Figure 4B). Moreover, when we placed dsxbrain>TrpA1 females in close proximity to a pair of males, without allowing physical contact, the activated females showed courtship-specific wing extension (Figures 4C and 4D), further indicating that male-like courtship in dsxbrain>TrpA1 females can be induced by volatile olfactory cues. Interestingly, removing the maxillary palps did not block courtship behavior (Figure 4B), suggesting that the relevant olfactory cues are detected by the antennae, not the maxillary palps.
Methyl Laurate, Methyl Myristate, and Methyl Palmitate Are Stimulatory Pheromones for Male-like Behaviors in Females
The finding that dsxbrain>TrpA1 females court both males and females (Figure 1F) suggested male-like behaviors might be induced by pheromones common to both sexes. Oenocyte cells (OEs) are the main sites of pheromone production in Drosophila, as ablation of these cells eliminates cuticular hydrocarbons, which act as pheromones [24, 26]. Surprisingly, males with and without OE cells elicited similar courtship levels in activated females (Figures 4E and 4F), suggesting that the pheromones that stimulate courtship in activated females are not produced by oenocytes. The only known volatile pheromone found in OE-less males is 11-cis-Vaccenyl acetate (cVA), as it is produced in the male ejaculatory bulb [27, 28]. However, cVA is missing in virgin females [29]; thus, it cannot explain why activated dsxbrain>TrpA1 females are stimulated to court virgin females. Indeed, cVA did not induce wing extension in solitary dsxbrain>TrpA1 females at 33°C (Figures 4G and 4H).
It was recently shown that methyl laurate (ML), methyl myristate (MM), and methyl palmitate (MP) are cuticular odorants that elicit short-range attraction behavior in both sexes and are present approximately equally in males and females [30]. Interestingly, ML, MM, and MP are found at normal levels in oenocyte-less flies as well as in other Drosophila species [30]. We tested whether exposing solitary dsxbrain>TrpA1 females to candidate odors promoted wing extension at 33°C. Whereas hexane, the solvent used to dilute the compounds, did not elicit wing extension, ML, MM, or MP all triggered this behavior (Figures 4G and 4H). In particular, MP triggered the highest levels of wing extension in activated females in our assay, which were similar to the levels elicited by the three compounds together (Figure 4H). These cuticular compounds appear to act at short distances in dsxbrain>TrpA1 females, as these females are generally in close contact with their courtship targets, and show decreased courtship levels in bigger chambers (<29% versus >43% courtship index, n = 25, p < 0.05).
We next asked whether dsxbrain>TrpA1 females could be stimulated by other Drosophila species [31, 32], which are not normally courted by D. melanogaster males [33]. We found that ∼60% of activated dsxbrain>TrpA1 females courted flies of related species within the melanogaster subgroup (D. simulans and D. yakuba), and more distantly related species within the subgenus Sophophora (D. wilistoni) (Figures S4A and S4B). Only ∼20%–30% of activated females showed courtship toward D. virilis flies, which are distantly related to D. melanogaster, having diverged about 60 million years ago [32]. While D. melanogaster, D. simulans, and D. yakuba produce either MP and/or ML and MM [30], we found that none of these methyl pheromones are present in D. virilis flies (Figure S4C). Interestingly, coating D. virilis males with MP increased both the number of dsxbrain>TrpA1 females displaying male courtship behaviors (∼56%) and the courtship levels when compared to hexane-treated D. virilis flies (Figure S4D). Our data support a role for MP as an important stimulatory olfactory cue for male courtship behaviors in dsxbrain>TrpA1 females.
Sexually Dimorphic Usage of Common Circuitry
If females have neurons capable of inducing courtship, why do they not normally display these male behaviors? Two observations may be instructive: first, females require more stimulation—both sensory and thermogenetic—to show male courtship behavior. dsx∩71G01>dTrpA1 females require higher temperatures than males, in addition to olfactory cues, to show activation-induced courtship (Figures S3A–S3C, S3J, and S3K). Second, stimulation of pC1 neurons in dsx∩71G01>dTrpA1 females induces different behaviors depending on the level of stimulation, which presumably correlates with heat-induced changes in the neural activity of pC1 neurons [14, 34, 35]). We found that raising the temperature from 22°C to 27°C increases female receptivity, seen in their latency to copulation (670 ± 50 s versus 1,452 ± 175 s, n = 20, p < 0.05) and their ability to elicit higher levels of male courtship (∼90% versus ∼66% courtship index, n = 20, p < 0.001). This is consistent with a previous study showing pC1 neurons are responsive to courtship-relevant stimuli, such as cVA and courtship song, and promote receptivity when activated at low temperatures [7]. We further found that raising the temperature from 27°C to 33°C causes females to transition from female-typical behaviors to male-typical behaviors (Figure S3L).
The reason males court, while females do not, may be due to an intrinsic difference in this key node in the courtship circuit. This could be a consequence of (1) differences in the number of pC1 neurons (e.g., fewer neurons in females are not sufficient to trigger male courtship behaviors), (2) differences in the intrinsic properties of pC1 neurons (e.g., they are less excitable in females), and/or (3) differences in the connectivity of pC1 neurons (e.g., they receive more inhibition or less excitation in females). Discrete pC1 neurons may function as a switch for courtship versus aggression in males, with fru+/dsx+ neurons mediating courtship and fru−/dsx+ mediating aggression [22]. Thus, the pC1 node in both sexes appears to integrate sensory cues to regulate socio-sexual behavior (courtship and aggression in males [3, 4, 21, 22, 36], receptivity in females [7]), but when it is strongly activated outside the physiological range in females, it can activate downstream circuitry (e.g., fru+ thoracic neurons [3, 19]) for courtship that normally lies dormant.
We have identified MP and related cuticular pheromones as stimulators of male-like behaviors in females. Interestingly, MP also triggers male courtship behaviors in solitary activated males (Figures S3D and S3E). ML, MM, and MP induce attraction behavior through Or88a olfactory neurons in the antenna, which can facilitate mate finding [30]. In addition, ML stimulates male copulation behavior via Or47b olfactory neurons [30, 37]. Thus, Or88a and Or47b-expressing neurons are strong candidates for mediating male courtship behaviors in dsxbrain>TrpA1 females.
How are pC1 activation and MP stimulation integrated? This cuticular pheromone might modulate the activity of pC1 neurons or, alternatively, pheromone-responsive circuits and pC1 neurons might converge on downstream neurons that mediate courtship behaviors in females and males. It should be noted that, since pC1 neurons are probably maximally activated at 33°C in our experiments (Figures S3J and S3K), MP is unlikely to further activate these neurons. This suggests that pC1 activation and MP stimulation may be integrated in downstream neurons.
It was previously proposed that male courtship behavior, such as song, may result from the activation of brain neurons unique to males [3, 19]. Here, we show that the female brain is capable of inducing male-like behaviors. Notably, a male-sexual behavior effector circuit has been shown to be present in the brain of female mice, which is normally repressed [38]. Hence, the existence of functional neuronal circuitry underlying male-specific behaviors in the normal female brain seems to be a conserved feature of courtship circuit organization [39].
Author Contributions
C.R., S.P., B.B., and S.F.G. designed the experiments and contributed to data analysis, interpretation, and discussion. C.R., S.P., H.J.P., T.N., B.B., L.A.D.D., and H.K.M.D. conducted the experiments. The manuscript was written by C.R. and corrected by S.F.G. All authors contributed to the revision of the final manuscript.
Acknowledgments
We thank Megan Neville, Andrew Lin, Luis Suarez, Annika Rings, Sofia Lavista-Llanos, and Ana Depetris Chauvin for helpful discussions and critical reading of the manuscript. We are also grateful to Joel Levine, Barry Dickson, David Anderson, Mike Ritchie, and Gerry Rubin for sharing important reagents with us. We thank Gregory Jefferis for advice on image registration. This work was supported by grants from the BBSRC (BB/N000803/1) to C.R., and S.F.G., and a Wellcome Trust Investigator Award to S.F.G (WT106189MA).
Published: August 25, 2016
Footnotes
Supplemental Information includes Supplemental Experimental Procedures, four figures, one table, and three movies and can be found with this article online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.07.021.
Supplemental Information
References
- 1.Pavlou H.J., Goodwin S.F. Courtship behavior in Drosophila melanogaster: towards a “courtship connectome”. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2013;23:76–83. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2012.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Auer T.O., Benton R. Sexual circuitry in Drosophila. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2016;38:18–26. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2016.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.von Philipsborn A.C., Liu T., Yu J.Y., Masser C., Bidaye S.S., Dickson B.J. Neuronal control of Drosophila courtship song. Neuron. 2011;69:509–522. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kohatsu S., Koganezawa M., Yamamoto D. Female contact activates male-specific interneurons that trigger stereotypic courtship behavior in Drosophila. Neuron. 2011;69:498–508. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.12.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rideout E.J., Dornan A.J., Neville M.C., Eadie S., Goodwin S.F. Control of sexual differentiation and behavior by the doublesex gene in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat. Neurosci. 2010;13:458–466. doi: 10.1038/nn.2515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kimura K., Sato C., Koganezawa M., Yamamoto D. Drosophila ovipositor extension in mating behavior and egg deposition involves distinct sets of brain interneurons. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0126445. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhou C., Pan Y., Robinett C.C., Meissner G.W., Baker B.S. Central brain neurons expressing doublesex regulate female receptivity in Drosophila. Neuron. 2014;83:149–163. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.05.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rezával C., Nojima T., Neville M.C., Lin A.C., Goodwin S.F. Sexually dimorphic octopaminergic neurons modulate female postmating behaviors in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 2014;24:725–730. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.12.051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rezával C., Pavlou H.J., Dornan A.J., Chan Y.B., Kravitz E.A., Goodwin S.F. Neural circuitry underlying Drosophila female postmating behavioral responses. Curr. Biol. 2012;22:1155–1165. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.04.062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sanders L.E., Arbeitman M.N. Doublesex establishes sexual dimorphism in the Drosophila central nervous system in an isoform-dependent manner by directing cell number. Dev. Biol. 2008;320:378–390. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.05.543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lee G., Hall J.C., Park J.H. Doublesex gene expression in the central nervous system of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Neurogenet. 2002;16:229–248. doi: 10.1080/01677060216292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Robinett C.C., Vaughan A.G., Knapp J.M., Baker B.S. Sex and the single cell. II. There is a time and place for sex. PLoS Biol. 2010;8:e1000365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Asahina K., Watanabe K., Duistermars B.J., Hoopfer E., González C.R., Eyjólfsdóttir E.A., Perona P., Anderson D.J. Tachykinin-expressing neurons control male-specific aggressive arousal in Drosophila. Cell. 2014;156:221–235. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hamada F.N., Rosenzweig M., Kang K., Pulver S.R., Ghezzi A., Jegla T.J., Garrity P.A. An internal thermal sensor controlling temperature preference in Drosophila. Nature. 2008;454:217–220. doi: 10.1038/nature07001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Von Schilcher F. The behavior of cacophony, a courtship song mutant in Drosophila melanogaster. Behav. Biol. 1976;17:187–196. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6773(76)90444-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bennet-Clark H.C.E.A.W. Pulse interval as a critical parameter in the courtship song of Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 1969;17:755–759. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Shirangi T.R., Stern D.L., Truman J.W. Motor control of Drosophila courtship song. Cell Rep. 2013;5:678–686. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.09.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Shirangi T.R., Wong A.M., Truman J.W., Stern D.L. Doublesex regulates the connectivity of a neural circuit controlling Drosophila male courtship song. Dev. Cell. 2016;37:533–544. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Clyne J.D., Miesenböck G. Sex-specific control and tuning of the pattern generator for courtship song in Drosophila. Cell. 2008;133:354–363. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pan Y., Meissner G.W., Baker B.S. Joint control of Drosophila male courtship behavior by motion cues and activation of male-specific P1 neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:10065–10070. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1207107109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kimura K., Hachiya T., Koganezawa M., Tazawa T., Yamamoto D. Fruitless and doublesex coordinate to generate male-specific neurons that can initiate courtship. Neuron. 2008;59:759–769. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Koganezawa M., Kimura K., Yamamoto D. The neural circuitry that functions as a witch for courtship versus aggression in Drosophila males. Curr. Biol. 2016;26:1395–1403. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.04.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Venken K.J., Simpson J.H., Bellen H.J. Genetic manipulation of genes and cells in the nervous system of the fruit fly. Neuron. 2011;72:202–230. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kohl J., Huoviala P., Jefferis G.S. Pheromone processing in Drosophila. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2015;34:149–157. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2015.06.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hartenstein V. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1993. Atlas of Drosophila Development. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Billeter J.C., Atallah J., Krupp J.J., Millar J.G., Levine J.D. Specialized cells tag sexual and species identity in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature. 2009;461:987–991. doi: 10.1038/nature08495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Butterworth F.M. Lipids of Drosophila: a newly detected lipid in the male. Science. 1969;163:1356–1357. doi: 10.1126/science.163.3873.1356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Brieger G., Butterworth F.M. Drosophila melanogaster: identity of male lipid in reproductive system. Science. 1970;167:1262. doi: 10.1126/science.167.3922.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ejima A., Smith B.P., Lucas C., van der Goes van Naters W., Miller C.J., Carlson J.R., Levine J.D., Griffith L.C. Generalization of courtship learning in Drosophila is mediated by cis-vaccenyl acetate. Curr. Biol. 2007;17:599–605. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.01.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Dweck H.K., Ebrahim S.A., Thoma M., Mohamed A.A., Keesey I.W., Trona F., Lavista-Llanos S., Svatoš A., Sachse S., Knaden M., Hansson B.S. Pheromones mediating copulation and attraction in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:E2829–E2835. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1504527112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ko W.Y., David R.M., Akashi H. Molecular phylogeny of the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. J. Mol. Evol. 2003;57:562–573. doi: 10.1007/s00239-003-2510-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Russo C.A., Takezaki N., Nei M. Molecular phylogeny and divergence times of drosophilid species. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1995;12:391–404. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Fan P., Manoli D.S., Ahmed O.M., Chen Y., Agarwal N., Kwong S., Cai A.G., Neitz J., Renslo A., Baker B.S., Shah N.M. Genetic and neural mechanisms that inhibit Drosophila from mating with other species. Cell. 2013;154:89–102. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.06.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Pulver S.R., Pashkovski S.L., Hornstein N.J., Garrity P.A., Griffith L.C. Temporal dynamics of neuronal activation by Channelrhodopsin-2 and TRPA1 determine behavioral output in Drosophila larvae. J. Neurophysiol. 2009;101:3075–3088. doi: 10.1152/jn.00071.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Berni J., Muldal A.M., Pulver S.R. Using neurogenetics and the warmth-gated ion channel TRPA1 to study the neural basis of behavior in Drosophila. J. Undergrad. Neurosci. Educ. 2010;9:A5–A14. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hoopfer E.D., Jung Y., Inagaki H.K., Rubin G.M., Anderson D.J. P1 interneurons promote a persistent internal state that enhances inter-male aggression in Drosophila. eLife. 2015;4:e11346. doi: 10.7554/eLife.11346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lin H.H., Cao D.S., Sethi S., Zeng Z., Chin J.S., Chakraborty T.S., Shepherd A.K., Nguyen C.A., Yew J.Y., Su C.Y., Wang J.W. Hormonal modulation of pheromone detection enhances male courtship success. Neuron. 2016;90:1272–1285. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kimchi T., Xu J., Dulac C. A functional circuit underlying male sexual behaviour in the female mouse brain. Nature. 2007;448:1009–1014. doi: 10.1038/nature06089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Dulac C., Kimchi T. Neural mechanisms underlying sex-specific behaviors in vertebrates. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2007;17:675–683. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2008.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.