Abstract
Results of routine perimetric testing of the left and right hemifields in normal subjects have been assumed to be symmetric although asymmetry due to hemispheric dominance has been established for other psychophysical tests. These asymmetries have sometimes been related to sex. With the advent of computerised static perimetry, subtle differences between the left and the right hemifields might be found that were not obvious before. This study investigated differences in retinal sensitivity between the hemifields and the role of sex and eye dominance. Forty three unequivocally right handed and right eye dominant normal adult volunteers, 24 females and 19 males, underwent Humphrey 24-2 testing, half beginning with the left eye, the other half with the right eye. The Peridata program was used to calculate decibel totals per hemifield. Four subjects were excluded because of poor cooperation or test artefacts. In females, the total of the left hemifield was significantly less than the right (p < 0.01) by a mean 18.2 (SD 24) dB equivalent to a difference of 0.34 dB per tested point. No significant difference in hemifields was found for males, between the sexes for both eyes combined, or between the two eyes for either sex. It was concluded that asymmetries in retinal sensitivity with respect to the vertical axis may be physiological and found in females, but not in males.
Full text
PDF




Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bradshaw J. L., Gates E. A. Visual field differences in verbal tasks: effects of task familiarity and sex of subject. Brain Lang. 1978 Mar;5(2):166–187. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(78)90016-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bryden M. P. Measuring handedness with questionnaires. Neuropsychologia. 1977;15(4-5):617–624. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(77)90067-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Corballis M. C., Manalo R. Effect of spatial attention on mental rotation. Neuropsychologia. 1993 Feb;31(2):199–205. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(93)90047-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davidoff J. B. Hemispheric differences in the perception of lightness. Neuropsychologia. 1975 Jan;13(1):121–124. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(75)90058-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DeLacoste-Utamsing C., Holloway R. L. Sexual dimorphism in the human corpus callosum. Science. 1982 Jun 25;216(4553):1431–1432. doi: 10.1126/science.7089533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Geschwind N., Levitsky W. Human brain: left-right asymmetries in temporal speech region. Science. 1968 Jul 12;161(3837):186–187. doi: 10.1126/science.161.3837.186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haun F. Functional dissociation of the hemispheres using foveal visual input. Neuropsychologia. 1978;16(6):725–733. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(78)90007-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kimura D., Harshman R. A. Sex differences in brain organization for verbal and non-verbal functions. Prog Brain Res. 1984;61:423–441. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)64452-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LANSDELL H. A sex difference in effect of temporallobe neurosurgery on design preference. Nature. 1962 Jun 2;194:852–854. doi: 10.1038/194852a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Malone D. R., Hannay H. J. Hemispheric dominance and normal color memory. Neuropsychologia. 1978;16(1):51–59. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(78)90042-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martin C. M. Verbal and spatial encoding of visual stimuli: the effects of sex, hemisphere and yes-no judgements. Cortex. 1978 Jun;14(2):227–233. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(78)80048-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rizzolatti G., Umiltà C., Berlucchi G. Opposite superiorities of the right and left cerebral hemispheres in discriminative reaction time to physiognomical and alphabetical material. Brain. 1971;94(3):431–442. doi: 10.1093/brain/94.3.431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Witelson S. F. Sex differences in neuroanatomical changes with aging. N Engl J Med. 1991 Jul 18;325(3):211–212. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199107183250318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
