Abstract
Clostridium difficile is an anaerobic bacterium that causes diarrheal illnesses. Disease onset is linked with exposure to oral antibiotics and consequent depletion of secondary bile acids. Here we investigate the relationship between in vitro secondary bile acid tolerance and in vivo disease scores of diverse C. difficile strains in mice.
Keywords: Clostridium difficile, secondary bile acid
Clostridium difficile is an anaerobic, spore-forming bacterium that causes an increasing number of antibiotic-associated intestinal infections in the hospital and community setting1–3. Exposure to C. difficile spores leads to a range of outcomes, from asymptomatic carriage to pseudomembranous colitis with life-threatening toxic megacolon4. Individuals most at risk for severe infection are those over 65 years of age with recent exposure to oral antibiotics and weakened immune systems5–6. In addition, virulent C. difficile strains exhibit significant genetic variability, and new strains are continuing to be discovered7–9. C. difficile toxin production10–11, sporulation12–13, flagella structure14, and germination efficiency15–16 have all been proposed to contribute to virulence, yet the bacterial phenotypes that influence disease outcome in the host remain incompletely defined. However, it is known that bile salts play an important role in the germination and growth of C. difficile in the mammalian host17–22.
Bile acids are amphipathic molecules produced by the liver and released by the gallbladder in response to food entering the intestine. They serve a critical role in the absorption of dietary fats and are increasingly appreciated as modulators of microbial populations in the gut. Humans synthesize their own primary bile acids23–24, which can then be dehydroxylated by a subset of commensal bacteria to form secondary bile acids (primarily deoxycholic acid and lithocholic acid). The relative concentrations of bile acids are especially important in C. difficile infections. The primary bile acid taurocholic acid induces germination of metabolically latent spores18,25, while secondary bile acids inhibit the growth of vegetative, toxin-producing cells18,26–28. Only a select group of bacteria produce the enzymes necessary to dehydroxylate primary bile acids, and they are sensitive to killing by many commonly prescribed antibiotics23,29. Recent work in our lab and others has shown that antibiotic treatment in mice shifts the bile acid pool towards a predominance of primary bile acids, and that the restoration of secondary bile acids to pre-antibiotic levels is associated with resistance to C. difficile infections27–28,30. However, this work has been conducted with a limited number of C. difficile strains. It remains to be determined if clinically relevant isolates exhibit heterogeneity in response to secondary bile acids, and if that heterogeneity associates with observed differences in virulence with a murine model of infection.
To address this question, we tested fecal samples obtained from patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the presence of C. difficile organisms by a PCR-based assay for C. difficile toxin B. While some patients had been diagnosed with C. difficile, other patients had not been diagnosed with C. difficile and thus were asymptomatic carriers31. We isolated individual C. difficile colonies from the infected stool and typed them using multi-locus sequence typing (MLST)32. Of the 21 isolates collected, 16 were members of clade 1 (including sequence types 2,6,12,42,46,58,107), two were members of clade 2 (sequence type 1, also classified as ribotype 027), and 1 each was a member of clade 4 and 5 (STs 39 and 11, respectively)32–33. We prepared purified spore suspensions for each clinical isolate according to published protocols34.
For the in vivo experiments, wild-type C57BL/6 mice (Jackson labs) were rendered susceptible to C. difficile by replacing their drinking water with antibiotic-containing water for three days. We used a cocktail of three antibiotics: metronidazole, (0.25 g·L−1, Sigma-Aldrich), neomycin (0.25 g·L−1, Sigma-Aldrich), and vancomycin (0.25 g·L−1, NOVA-PLUS). Two days after stopping antibiotic water, mice were additionally treated with 200 μg clindamycin (Sigma-Aldrich) via intraperitoneal injection. We inoculated mice 24 hours later with 100 spores of individual clinical isolates via oral gavage, infecting five mice with each isolate. After infection, mice were monitored daily for indicators of morbidity and given a disease score35. Additionally, fecal pellets were collected 1, 2, 7, and 14 days after infection and quantified for C. difficile burden36.
We found that infection with C. difficile clinical isolates caused a range of disease severity in mice (Fig. 1A–B). The most virulent strains were members of clade 2 (MLST1/ribotype 027) and clade 5 (MLST11, also classified as ribotype 078) (Fig. 1A). These strains approached and/or surpassed the disease score of our reference strain, VPI10463, a notoriously virulent strain13,37. Members of clade 4 (1 isolate) and clade 1 (16 isolates) had heterogeneous disease scores but consistently produced lower morbidity than VPI10463 (Fig. 1A and B, respectively). The differences in observed morbidity could not be attributed to differences in colonization ability of the clinical isolates, as fecal samples from all infected mice harbored in excess of 106 colony forming units per gram two days after infection (Fig. 1C), and mice remained heavily infected throughout the two-week experiment (data not shown).
Figure 1. In vivo disease scores and bacterial burden of C. difficile clinical isolates.
(A) Disease scores for wild type C57BL/6 mice infected with C. difficile isolates identified as MLST1/Clade 2 (red, two isolates), MLST39/Clade 4 (purple), and MLST11/Clade 5 (orange) as compared with the reference strain, VPI10463 (black). (B) Disease scores for wild type mice infected with C. difficile isolates identified as members of Clade 1 (blue, various MLST types) as compared with VPI10463 (black). (C). C. difficile burden as measured from mouse fecal content two days after infection. Numbers at the base of the bars indicate MLST classification. n = 5 mice for each clinical isolate tested, data shown are mean +/− SEM. d = day; CFU/g = colony forming units per gram of feces.
We next investigated the impact of secondary bile acids on the growth kinetics of the isolates in an in vitro setting. Anaerobic culturing at 37°C was performed and growth was monitored by measurement of optical density of each clinical isolate over a 22-hour period. Each isolate was grown under three treatment conditions: (1) vehicle (brain-heart infusion media supplemented with yeast extract and cysteine), (2) vehicle with 0.01% lithocholic acid, and (3) vehicle with 0.01% deoxycholic acid (BHI and yeast extract from BD Biosciences, others from Sigma-Aldrich). We repeated each experiment twice, for a total of three trials.
Figure 2 reports the growth curves of the laboratory reference strain VPI10463 in response to treatment with lithocholic acid (LCA, Fig. 2A) and deoxycholic acid (DCA, Fig. 2D). In addition, each of the examined clinical isolates was inhibited by LCA and DCA, although to varying degrees (see Fig. 2B and 2E for growth comparison during the exponential phase, and 2C and 2F for growth comparison after cultures reached the stationary phase). In some cases, variation in bile acid tolerance was seen even in strains classified as the same MLST group (see Fig. 2B, MLST 2’s, and Fig. 2E, MLST 1’s as examples).
Figure 2. In vitro growth suppression of C. difficile clinical isolates by the secondary bile acids lithocholic acid and deoxycholic acid.
(A,D) Growth kinetics of C. difficile strain VPI10463 in the absence (solid line, bounded by light gray region) or presence (dotted line, bounded by dark gray region) of lithocholic acid (A) and deoxycholic acid (D), as measured in the change in optical density. (B–C) Tolerance of each C. difficile clinical isolate to administration of lithocholic acid and (E–F) deoxycholic acid at indicated time points. Numbers at the base of the bars indicate MLST classification. All experiments were conducted three times, data shown are mean +/− SEM.
Because each of the clinical isolates was unique in terms of secondary bile acid tolerance and murine in vivo disease score, we next explored the relationship between these two variables (Figure 3). We found that at two days after infection, the clinical isolates rated most virulent exhibited a trend towards increased lithocholic acid resistance (p = 0.108, Fig. 3A, orange points). This trend achieved statistical significance with the clinical isolates that caused morbidity beyond the window of acute infection. C. difficile isolates with the highest disease score one and two weeks after infection were also the isolates most tolerant to LCA exposure in vitro (p = 0.017 at week 1 (blue points), p = 0.037 at week 2 (gray points)). In contrast, we did not find a significant correlation between host disease scores and tolerance to deoxycholic acid (Fig. 3B).
Figure 3. Comparison of secondary bile acid tolerance and in vivo disease score of clinical C. difficile isolates.
Tolerance to (A) lithocholic acid or (B) deoxycholic acid during exponential growth was compared to the mean in vivo disease scores recorded two days (orange), one week (blue), and two weeks (gray) after infection. We compared bile acid tolerance to disease score at each time point by calculating the linear regression (solid lines, with 95% confidence interval in the corresponding shaded region), *p<0.05. ns = not significant. O.D. = optical density (600 nm).
Antibiotics of various classes disrupt the normal balance of bile acids in the mouse intestine, decreasing the relative concentrations of secondary bile acids as they increase susceptibility to C. difficile infections27–28,38. Administration of a cocktail of bacteria that contained a species capable of converting primary bile acids to their secondary counterparts (Clostridium scindens) is sufficient to increase resistance to C. difficile challenge. The link between antibiotic administration, secondary bile acid depletion, and increased susceptibility to C. difficile infections has been well documented in the literature27–30; however, the impact of strain type on bile acid tolerance and in vivo virulence has remained largely unexplored.
Our results demonstrate that for a small cohort of C. difficile clinical isolates, in vitro tolerance to lithocholic acid administration is associated with higher disease scores in the mouse model. The association is stronger in later stages of the infection (one and two weeks after spore administration), during which time the microbiota is recovering from antibiotic treatment and secondary bile acids are returning to their pre-treatment levels27,29. In contrast, no association was found for in vivo disease scores and deoxycholic acid tolerance. Little is known about the response of Clostridial species to bile acid stress; studies with other gram positive organisms suggest strain variation in bile acid sensitivity is common39,40. Further investigation into the mechanism of LCA and DCA tolerance may help explain the observations presented in this study.
Growth in the presence of toxic metabolites is just one way an individual C. difficile strain can cause disease in the host; other contributing factors include toxin production, germination efficiency, sporulation efficiency, and flagellar structure10–16. Future studies will test the hypothesis that bile acid tolerance acts in combination with other virulence mechanisms. For example, a relative increase in lithocholic acid tolerance may extend a given C. difficile strain’s ability to produce toxin and allow it to cause persistent disease in the host. Our study is limited both by the small sample size of clinical isolates used and by their restricted phylogenetic diversity (most are members of clade 1). Additional relationships between secondary bile acid tolerance and in vivo virulence could be elucidated with a larger, more diverse cohort of clinical isolates.
Highlights.
C. difficile isolates collected from patients cause a range of disease in mice
These isolates exhibit variable tolerance to secondary bile acids in vitro
Tolerance to lithocholic acid is associated with higher disease scores in mice
Acknowledgments
Tracy McMillet for multi-locus sequence typing of the clinical isolates
Financial support. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (grant R01 AI95706), the Tow Foundation, and the Lucille Castori Center for Microbes, Inflammation and Cancer to EGP. BBL was supported by a Medical Scientist Training Program grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences, NIH (award T32GM07739 to the Weill Cornell/Rockefeller/Sloan Kettering Tri-institutional MD-PhD Program).
Footnotes
Potential conflicts of interest. All authors: No reported conflicts.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.McDonald L Clifford, Killgore George E, Thompson Angela, Owens Robert C, Kazakova Sophia V, Sambol Susan P, Johnson Stuart, Gerding Dale N. An epidemic, toxin gene-variant strain of clostridium difficile. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(23):2433–41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Riggs Michelle M, Sethi Ajay K, Zabarsky Trina F, Eckstein Elizabeth C, Jump Robin LP, Donskey Curtis J. Asymptomatic carriers are a potential source for transmission of epidemic and nonepidemic clostridium difficile strains among long-term care facility residents. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45(8):992–8. doi: 10.1086/521854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.He Miao, Miyajima Fabio, Roberts Paul, Ellison Louise, Pickard Derek J, Martin Melissa J, Connor Thomas R, et al. Emergence and global spread of epidemic healthcare-associated clostridium difficile. Nat Genet. 2013;45(1):109–13. doi: 10.1038/ng.2478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bartlett John G. Historical perspectives on studies of clostridium difficile and C. Difficile infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46(Suppl 1):S4–11. doi: 10.1086/521865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pépin Jacques, Valiquette Louis, Alary Marie-Eve, Villemure Philippe, Pelletier Annick, Forget Karine, Pépin Karine, Chouinard Daniel. Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in a region of quebec from 1991 to 2003: A changing pattern of disease severity. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2004;171(5):466–472. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1041104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Feuerstadt Paul, Das Rohit, Brandt Lawrence J. The evolution of urban C. Difficile infection (CDI): CDI in 2009–2011 is less severe and has better outcomes than CDI in 2006–2008. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2014;109(8):1265–1276. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lim Sze K, Stuart Rhonda L, Mackin Kate E, Carter Glen P, Kotsanas Despina, Francis Michelle J, Easton Marion, et al. Emergence of a ribotype 244 strain of clostridium difficile associated with severe disease and related to the epidemic ribotype 027 strain. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58(12):1723–30. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Stabler Richard A, Dawson Lisa F, Valiente Esmeralda, Cairns Michelle D, Martin Melissa J, Donahue Elizabeth H, Riley Thomas V, et al. Macro and micro diversity of clostridium difficile isolates from diverse sources and geographical locations. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e31559. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Quesada-Gómez Carlos, López-Ureña Diana, Acuña-Amador Luis, Villalobos-Zúñiga Manuel, Du Tim, Freire Rosemayre, Guzmán-Verri Caterina, et al. Emergence of an outbreak-associated clostridium difficile variant with increased virulence. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53(4):1216–26. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03058-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Loo Vivian G, Poirier Louise, Miller Mark A, Oughton Matthew, Libman Michael D, Michaud Sophie, Bourgault Anne-Marie, et al. A predominantly clonal multi-institutional outbreak of clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea with high morbidity and mortality. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(23):2442–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Goldenberg Simon D, French Gary L. Lack of association of tcdc type and binary toxin status with disease severity and outcome in toxigenic clostridium difficile. J Infect. 2011;62(5):355–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2011.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Vohra Prerna, Poxton Ian R. Comparison of toxin and spore production in clinically relevant strains of clostridium difficile. Microbiology. 2011;157(Pt 5):1343–53. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.046243-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Merrigan Michelle, Venugopal Anilrudh, Mallozzi Michael, Roxas Bryan, Viswanathan VK, Johnson Stuart, Gerding Dale N, Vedantam Gayatri. Human hypervirulent clostridium difficile strains exhibit increased sporulation as well as robust toxin production. J Bacteriol. 2010;192(19):4904–11. doi: 10.1128/JB.00445-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Stevenson Emma, Minton Nigel P, Kuehne Sarah A. The role of flagella in clostridium difficile pathogenicity. Trends Microbiol. 2015;23(5):275–82. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2015.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Moore P, Kyne L, Martin A, Solomon K. Germination efficiency of clinical clostridium difficile spores and correlation with ribotype, disease severity and therapy failure. J Med Microbiol. 2013;62(Pt 9):1405–13. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.056614-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Carlson Paul E, Kaiser Alyssa M, McColm Sarah A, Bauer Jessica M, Young Vincent B, Aronoff David M, Hanna Philip C. Variation in germination of clostridium difficile clinical isolates correlates to disease severity. Anaerobe. 2015;33:64–70. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2015.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wilson KH. Efficiency of various bile salt preparations for stimulation of clostridium difficile spore germination. J Clin Microbiol. 1983;18(4):1017–9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.4.1017-1019.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sorg Joseph A, Sonenshein Abraham L. Bile salts and glycine as cogerminants for clostridium difficile spores. J Bacteriol. 2008;190(7):2505–12. doi: 10.1128/JB.01765-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sorg Joseph A, Sonenshein Abraham L. Chenodeoxycholate is an inhibitor of clostridium difficile spore germination. J Bacteriol. 2009;191(3):1115–7. doi: 10.1128/JB.01260-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sorg Joseph A, Sonenshein Abraham L. Inhibiting the initiation of clostridium difficile spore germination using analogs of chenodeoxycholic acid, a bile acid. J Bacteriol. 2010;192(19):4983–90. doi: 10.1128/JB.00610-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Heeg Daniela, Burns David A, Cartman Stephen T, Minton Nigel P. Spores of clostridium difficile clinical isolates display a diverse germination response to bile salts. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e32381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Weingarden Alexa R, Chen Chi, Bobr Aleh, Yao Dan, Lu Yuwei, Nelson Valerie M, Sadowsky Michael J, Khoruts Alexander. Microbiota transplantation restores normal fecal bile acid composition in recurrent clostridium difficile infection. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2014;306(4):G310–9. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00282.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ridlon Jason M, Kang Dae-Joong, Hylemon Phillip B. Bile salt biotransformations by human intestinal bacteria. J Lipid Res. 2006;47(2):241–59. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R500013-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Russell David W. The enzymes, regulation, and genetics of bile acid synthesis. Annual Review of Biochemistry. 2003;72(1):137–174. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.72.121801.161712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wilson KH, Kennedy MJ, Fekety FR. Use of sodium taurocholate to enhance spore recovery on a medium selective for clostridium difficile. J Clin Microbiol. 1982;15(3):443–6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.3.443-446.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Francis Michael B, Allen Charlotte A, Sorg Joseph A. Muricholic acids inhibit clostridium difficile spore germination and growth. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e73653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Theriot Casey M, Koenigsknecht Mark J, Carlson Paul E, Hatton Gabrielle E, Nelson Adam M, Li Bo, Huffnagle Gary B, Li Jun Z, Young Vincent B. Antibiotic-induced shifts in the mouse gut microbiome and metabolome increase susceptibility to clostridium difficile infection. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3114. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Buffie Charlie G, Bucci Vanni, Stein Richard R, McKenney Peter T, Ling Lilan, Gobourne Asia, No Daniel, et al. Precision microbiome reconstitution restores bile acid mediated resistance to clostridium difficile. Nature. 2015;517(7533):205–8. doi: 10.1038/nature13828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Theriot Casey M, Bowman Alison A, Young Vincent B. Antibiotic-Induced alterations of the gut microbiota alter secondary bile acid production and allow for clostridium difficile spore germination and outgrowth in the large intestine. MSphere. 2016;1(1):e00045–15. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00045-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Koenigsknecht Mark J, Theriot Casey M, Bergin Ingrid L, Schumacher Cassie A, Schloss Patrick D, Young Vincent B. Dynamics and establishment of clostridium difficile infection in the murine gastrointestinal tract. Infect Immun. 2015;83(3):934–41. doi: 10.1128/IAI.02768-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kinnebrew Melissa A, Lee Yeon Joo, Jenq Robert R, Lipuma Lauren, Littmann Eric R, Gobourne Asia, No Daniel, van den Brink Marcel, Pamer Eric G, Taur Ying. Early clostridium difficile infection during allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e90158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Griffiths David, Fawley Warren, Kachrimanidou Melina, Bowden Rory, Crook Derrick W, Fung Rowena, Golubchik Tanya, Harding Rosalind M, Jeffery Katie JM, Jolley Keith A. Multilocus sequence typing of clostridium difficile. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(3):770–778. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01796-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Janezic Sandra, Rupnik Maja. Genomic diversity of clostridium difficile strains. Res Microbiol. 2015;166(4):353–60. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2015.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sorg Joseph A, Dineen Sean S. Laboratory maintenance of clostridium difficile. Current Protocols in Microbiology. 2009;9A-1 doi: 10.1002/9780471729259.mc09a01s12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Abt Michael C, Lewis Brittany B, Caballero Silvia, Xiong Huizhong, Carter Rebecca A, Sušac Bože, Ling Lilan, Leiner Ingrid, Pamer Eric G. Innate immune defenses mediated by two ILC subsets are critical for protection against acute clostridium difficile infection. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;18(1):27–37. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.06.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Buffie Charlie G, Jarchum Irene, Equinda Michele, Lipuma Lauren, Gobourne Asia, Viale Agnes, Ubeda Carles, Xavier Joao, Pamer Eric G. Profound alterations of intestinal microbiota following a single dose of clindamycin results in sustained susceptibility to clostridium difficile-induced colitis. Infect Immun. 2012;80(1):62–73. doi: 10.1128/IAI.05496-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Theriot Casey M, Koumpouras Charles C, Carlson Paul E, Bergin Ingrid I, Aronoff David M, Young Vincent B. Cefoperazone-treated mice as an experimental platform to assess differential virulence of clostridium difficile strains. Gut Microbes. 2011;2(6):326–34. doi: 10.4161/gmic.19142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Giel Jennifer L, Sorg Joseph A, Sonenshein Abraham L, Zhu Jun. Metabolism of bile salts in mice influences spore germination in clostridium difficile. PLoS One. 2010;5(1):e8740. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Chateau N, Deschamps AM, Hadj Sassi A. Heterogeneity of bile salts resistance in the Lactobacillus isolates of a probiotic consortium. Letts Appl Microbiol. 1994;18:42–44. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Olier M, Rousseaux S, Piveteau P, Lemaître JP, Rousset A, Guzzo J. Screening of glutamate decarboxylase activity and bile salt resistance of human asymptomatic carriage, clinical, food, and environmental isolates of Listeria monocytogenes. Int J Food Microbiol. 2004;93:87–99. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2003.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]