Abstract
Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is increasingly being used to treat refractory and recurring Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Although FMT appears to be safe and highly effective in patients with a preserved colon and immunocompetence, its use in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who are on immunomodulating therapies is controversial. In particular, patients who have undergone colectomy may have different treatment responses to FMT. In this case report, we describe the successful use of FMT in a female patient aged 19 years with Crohn's disease who underwent ileorectal anastomosis following colectomy. She had recurrent CDIs that were refractory to metronidazole, pulse-tapered vancomycin and fidaxomicin treatments. She underwent 2 FMTs, which were performed via sigmoidoscopy; her mother served as a donor. Follow-up was conducted for 12 months and indicated sustained remission of CDI.
Background
Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at an increased risk for recurrent and treatment-refractory Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), which may lead to colectomy.1 2 Although CDI mainly affects the colon, it has been reported in patients who have previously underwent colectomy, and CDIs in the small bowel and ileo-anal reservoirs are increasingly being reported.3 4 The standard treatment for CDI is antibiotics, which are curative in 70–80% of cases. However, recurrent CDI is a therapeutic challenge, with 20–30% of patients experiencing recurrence within 2 weeks after completion of a first course of antibiotics.5 Approximately 20–40% of patients experience subsequent infections after the first recurrence.6
Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a promising therapy for CDI. In two recent randomised trials, FMT was superior to vancomycin in treating recurrent CDI.7 8
In the current case report, we describe the successful use of FMT to treat a patient with Crohn's disease with relapsed CDI following subtotal colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis.
Case presentation
An otherwise healthy young female was diagnosed with colonic Crohn's disease at 11 years of age. Treatment with intravenous methylprednisolone (40 mg daily) and metronidazole followed by a 17-week-long prednisolone taper combined with 1200 mg mesalazine and 100 mg azathioprine lead to brief symptomatic remission.
One week after completing the prednisolone taper, the patient experienced the first of a series of CDIs. On initial metronidazole treatment, she improved clinically, but her CDI relapsed after treatment cessation. Over the next years, she experienced nine recurrences of CDI, which were treated with either 400 mg metronidazole three times daily for 10 days or 250 mg oral vancomycin four times daily for 3 weeks. The CDI recurred after each treatment. Sustained clinical remission was only obtained with continuous administration of 400 mg metronidazole one to three times daily in combination with 250 mg of the non-pathogenic yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae three times daily. The patient was not infected with C. difficile BI/NAP1/027 ribotype at any time.
Five years after her Crohn's disease diagnosis, the patient experienced increasing symptoms, including lower abdominal pain, bloody stools and vomiting. Faecal cultures were negative, and colonoscopy revealed a severe stenosis in the sigmoid colon. Infliximab treatment led to short-term improvement; however, this improvement was followed by a new CDI, which was treated with 500 mg metronidazole three times daily for 10 days. Repeated stool cultures confirmed the clearance of the infection. Increasing symptoms from the sigmoid stenosis were treated with a colectomy and the formation of an ileorectal anastomosis.
Following surgery, the patient was medication-free for 1 year. However, because of increasing rectal inflammation, a combination treatment with infliximab and azathioprine was initiated. This treatment successfully induced sustained remission.
Three years after her colectomy, the patient, having reached 19 years in age at that point, experienced a recurrence of CDI. Following an unsuccessful 10-day vancomycin trial, she was treated with vancomycin combined with Saccharomyces boulardii capsules for 6 weeks and then with 200 mg fidaxomicin two times per day for 10 days. The effect was transient, and CDI recurred after 3 weeks. The infection was at no time treatment refractory to neither of the used antibiotics, but eventually recurred following cessation of the treatments. After the last relapse following the fidaxomicin treatment, FMT was considered.
Treatment
Following preparation with 125 mg vancomycin four times daily for 6 days, the patient underwent FMT using donor stool from her mother, who had been serologically screened to verify the absence of HIV, Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus and hepatitis B and C. The stool cultures were verified to be free of pathogenic bacteria and C. difficile. Following initial recovery, the patient's CDI relapsed after 2 weeks. Another FMT procedure was performed, using the same donor and method. The second procedure led to complete recovery from CDI, which was sustained at her 1-year follow-up examination.
The FMTs were administered through the working channel of a video endoscope placed 40–60 cm above the ileorectal anastomosis, as well as in the rectum. During the endoscopy, the ileum appeared normal, and there was unspecific erythema in the rectum. No immediate or delayed adverse effects of the FMTs were observed.
Outcome and follow-up
Clostridium difficile stool cultures 12 months after the last FMT were negative. Treatment with infliximab and azathioprine was continued throughout this period.
Discussion
Increasing evidence supports the use of FMT as an efficient therapy for severe cases of recurrent CDI,9 and it is becoming the standard of care in many centres.10 In the present case report, we describe the use of FMT for recurring CDI in a patient with an ileorectal anastomosis following subtotal colectomy for Crohn's disease.
IBD is associated with a threefold increased risk of community-acquired CDI,11 and a 30% risk of CDI recurrence after the first episode.1 Furthermore, in IBD patients, CDIs are less responsive to metronidazole than in the general population,2 and cause increased morbidity and mortality.12
The faecal microbiota of IBD patients is characterised by decreased biodiversity. This reduced biodiversity may increase susceptibility to CDI. Whether these changes are a cause or a consequence of IBD is unknown.13 The faecal microbiota composition was not investigated in this patient. Many IBD patients are treated with immunomodulators and glucocorticoids, which are independent risk factors for severe infection and mortality in patients with CDI.14 15
In IBD patients, CDI is less frequently caused by the use of antibiotics than in the general population, as only 43% of CDI cases in active IBD patients are associated with exposure to antibiotics.16 CDI in IBD patients represents a unique clinical challenge, and CDI can mimic and precipitate an IBD flare. Therefore, all IBD patients should be tested for CDI prior to undergoing treatment for acute flares. A positive C. difficile stool test does not necessarily indicate clinically significant infection, because C. difficile can be present as asymptomatic colonisation. In our patient, too, symptoms of CDI and active Crohn's disease were similar. The distinction between the two was mainly based on the time pattern of sudden onset of watery stools and malaise following cessation of antibiotic treatment in combination with a positive CD stool test, and documentation of CD clearance and clinical improvement during antibiotic treatment. During the last four CDIs, stable doses of immunosuppressive and biological therapy were provided, and the patient was in clinical remission during vancomycin or fidaxomicin treatment.
Colectomy does not protect against CDI; rather, it may increase the risk of CDI in patients with ileostomies and ileo-anal reservoirs (J-pouch).17 18 As the current case report indicates, patients with an ileorectal anastomosis following colectomy may acquire CDI.
The standard treatment for CDI is antibiotic therapy with either metronidazole or oral vancomycin in the case of severe disease. In relapsing infection, prolonged treatment with tapered doses of vancomycin for 6 weeks combined with 4 weeks of S. boulardii has been recommended.19 Although fidaxomicin did not improve the clinical course in our patient, the administration of 200 mg fidaxomicin two times per day for 10 days may reduce the risk of recurrence compared with vancomycin treatment.20
Recently, FMT was found to be superior to vancomycin for treating recurrent CDI in two randomised trials.7 8 The cure rates were 90–94% in the FMT groups compared with 26–27% in the groups of patients treated with vancomycin. In previous case reports and case series of IBD patients treated with FMT for CDI, remission rates of up to 70% have been reported.21 However, no report on the use of FMT for refractory or recurring CDI after subtotal colectomy has been published, although there are reports of patients with refractory and recurrent CDIs of the ileo-anal pouch undergoing successful treatment with FMT.3 Seril and Shen3 proposed oral vancomycin for the index CDI and early use of FMT as an algorithm for the management of CDI after colectomy.
Our patient became immunocompromised in response to combined treatment with a biological and an immunomodulator. This gave rise to concerns regarding the risks of bacterial translocation and overgrowth following FMT. A compromised immune system per se does not appear to be a problem, as FMT has been reported to be safe for patients receiving immunosuppressive treatment,22 In IBD patients, the overall safety of FMT may not be as high as in patients with CDI without concomitant IBD.21 The adverse events that have been reported after FMT in patients with IBD include fever, increased C reactive protein, diarrhoea, vomiting, bacteraemia and flare-ups of ulcerative colitis.21 The risk of these adverse events may be related to the compromised gut barriers observed in these patients.21
The current case report suggests that FMT is an efficient and safe treatment for CDI in immunocompromised and postcolectomy patients with Crohn's disease. The current state of knowledge regarding the use of FMT in patients with IBD and CDI after colectomy is mainly based on case reports. Comparative studies examining the management of CDI after colectomy in patients with IBD are warranted to establish treatment algorithms that rank antibiotic regimens and FMT.
Patient's perspective.
My experience
After many attempts to keep the clostridia away, I was introduced to the idea of faecal transplantation. When I first heard it mentioned, I thought, ‘This is simply too disgusting—I will never have that treatment! Receiving faeces from another human being is simply too odd. However, I became much more calm and positive about the treatment when I was told that the donor could be a person I knew, and after thorough discussions with the physician, I decided to try it out’.
It did not take long after the first transplantation before I had clostridia again, and I was disappointed with yet another defeat. But, after the second treatment, I continuously improved, and I have been now been cured from clostridia for a year! This is the best decision that I have ever made.
Learning points.
Patients with inflammatory bowel disease are at an increased risk for recurrent and treatment-refractory Clostridium difficile infection (CDI).
Colectomy does not protect against CDI; rather, it may increase the risk of CDI in patients with ileostomies and ileo-anal reservoirs (J-pouch).
The current case report suggests that FMT is an efficient and safe treatment for CDI in immunocompromised and postcolectomy patients with Crohn's disease.
Footnotes
Contributors: AMO is responsible for literature search, drafting the article and revising it for important intellectual content. JFD and LAC are responsible for revising the article for important intellectual content. CLH is responsible for literature search, revising the article for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Competing interests: None declared.
Patient consent: Obtained.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
References
- 1.Garey KW, Sethi S, Yadav Y et al. . Meta-analysis to assess risk factors for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. J Hosp Infect 2008;70:298–304. 10.1016/j.jhin.2008.08.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bossuyt P, Verhaegen J, Van Assche G et al. . Increasing incidence of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in inflammatory bowel disease. J Crohns Colitis 2009;3:4–7. 10.1016/j.crohns.2008.09.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Seril DN, Shen B. Clostridium difficile infection in the postcolectomy patient. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2014;20:2450–69. 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Holmer C, Zurbuchen U, Siegmund B et al. . Clostridium difficile infection of the small bowel—two case reports with a literature survey. Int J Colorectal Dis 2011;26:245–51. 10.1007/s00384-010-1001-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Abou Chakra CN, Pepin J, Sirard S et al. . Risk factors for recurrence, complications and mortality in Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review. PLoS ONE 2014;9:e98400 10.1371/journal.pone.0098400 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Johnson S. Recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: a review of risk factors, treatments, and outcomes. J Infect 2009;58:403–10. 10.1016/j.jinf.2009.03.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.van Nood E, Vrieze A, Nieuwdorp M et al. . Duodenal infusion of donor feces for recurrent Clostridium difficile. N Engl J Med 2013;368:407–15. 10.1056/NEJMoa1205037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cammarota G, Masucci L, Ianiro G et al. . Randomised clinical trial: faecal microbiota transplantation by colonoscopy vs. vancomycin for the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2015;41:835–43. 10.1111/apt.13144 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Borody TJ, Brandt LJ, Paramsothy S. Therapeutic faecal microbiota transplantation: current status and future developments. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2014;30:97–105. 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gough E, Shaikh H, Manges AR. Systematic review of intestinal microbiota transplantation (fecal bacteriotherapy) for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Infect Dis 2011;53:994–1002. 10.1093/cid/cir632 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Furuya-Kanamori L, Stone JC, Clark J et al. . Comorbidities, exposure to medications, and the risk of community-acquired Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;36:132–41. 10.1017/ice.2014.39 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jen MH, Saxena S, Bottle A et al. . Increased health burden associated with Clostridium difficile diarrhoea in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011;33:1322–31. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04661.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Manichanh C, Borruel N, Casellas F et al. . The gut microbiota in IBD. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012;9:599–608. 10.1038/nrgastro.2012.152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dallal RM, Harbrecht BG, Boujoukas AJ et al. . Fulminant Clostridium difficile: an underappreciated and increasing cause of death and complications. Ann Surg 2002;235:363–72. 10.1097/00000658-200203000-00008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Das R, Feuerstadt P, Brandt LJ. Glucocorticoids are associated with increased risk of short-term mortality in hospitalized patients with Clostridium difficile-associated disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105:2040–9. 10.1038/ajg.2010.142 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Goodhand JR, Alazawi W, Rampton DS. Systematic review: Clostridium difficile and inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011;33:428–41. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04548.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lavallée C, Laufer B, Pépin J et al. . Fatal Clostridium difficile enteritis caused by the BI/NAP1/027 strain: a case series of ileal C. difficile infections . Clin Microbiol Infect 2009;15:1093–9. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.03004.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tsiouris A, Neale JA, Reickert CA et al. . Clostridium difficile of the ileum following total abdominal colectomy, with or without proctectomy: who is at risk? Dis Colon Rectum 2012;55:424–8. 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31823f86a2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Debast SB, Bauer MP, Kuijper EJ et al. . Update of the treatment guidance document for Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Microbiol Infect 2014;20(Suppl 2):1–26. 10.1111/1469-0691.12418 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Louie TJ, Miller MA, Mullane KM et al. . Fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection. N Engl J Med 2011;364:422–31. 10.1056/NEJMoa0910812 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ianiro G, Bibbò S, Scaldaferri F et al. . Fecal microbiota transplantation in inflammatory bowel disease: beyond the excitement. Medicine (Baltimore) 2014;93:e97 10.1097/MD.0000000000000097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kelly CR, Ihunnah C, Fischer M et al. . Fecal microbiota transplant for treatment of Clostridium difficile infection in immunocompromised patients. Am J Gastroenterol 2014;109:1065–71. 10.1038/ajg.2014.133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]