Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Rand Health Quarterly logoLink to Rand Health Quarterly
. 2013 Feb 28;2(4):4.

Interventions to Improve Student Mental Health

A Literature Review to Guide Evaluation of California's Mental Health Prevention and Early Intervention Initiative

Bradley D Stein, Lisa Sontag-Padilla, Karen Chan Osilla, Michelle W Woodbridge, Courtney Ann Kase, Lisa H Jaycox, Elizabeth J D'Amico, Jennifer L Cerully, Nicole K Eberhart, Shari Golan
PMCID: PMC5052079  PMID: 28083276

Short abstract

The authors review data on the prevalence of youth mental health disorders and schools' use of student mental health (SMH) programs and describe schools' role in addressing SMH concerns and outline a conceptual model for guiding program evaluation.

Abstract

The authors review data on the prevalence of youth mental health disorders and schools' use of student mental health (SMH) programs. They also describe the role of schools in addressing SMH concerns and outline a conceptual model for guiding evaluation of SMH programs. Finally, they touch on issues related to evaluation of cross-system collaborations that can influence students' access to resources and services and then review some of the challenges associated with evaluating SMH programs. They determine that SMH programs can be effective and can improve staff, faculty, and student knowledge of mental health problems; provide skills for identifying and referring students with mental health and social and emotional difficulties; and change attitudes toward mental health problems.

Mental health problems are common among children and adolescents; approximately 25 percent of children experience a mental health disorder annually, and 40 percent of adolescents meet lifetime diagnostic criteria for multiple mental health disorders (Merikangas et al., 2010a; Merikangas et al., 2010b; Kessler et al., 2005) Mental health disorders can greatly affect children and adolescents' functioning in multiple domains, including at school, in the home, with friends, and in communities (Kovacs and Goldston, 1991; Renouf, Kovacs and Mukerji, 1997; Asarnow et al., 2005; Jaycox et al., 2009).

Given the high prevalence of mental health disorders among children and adolescents, schools have developed programs to meet students' mental health needs. These student mental health (SMH) programs can range from universal to highly targeted. Universal programs are designed to increase awareness of and sensitivity to mental health issues in students—for example, by supporting students coping with stress and encouraging student help-seeking behaviors. The more-targeted programs are designed to provide staff or faculty skills to identify and respond to specific mental health issues or populations (e.g., suicide prevention, substance use). Evaluating the diverse array of SMH programs is critical to improving their effectiveness.

In this study, we provide an overview of selected scientific literature related to the evaluation of SMH programs. This review was conducted to inform RAND's evaluation of the California Mental Health Services Authority (CalMHSA) Prevention and Early Intervention (PEI) initiatives. CalMHSA is an organization of county governments working to improve mental health outcomes in the state of California. SMH is one of three key initiative areas, and we focused our review on research that is most relevant to the CalMHSA evaluation.

First, we review data on the prevalence of youth mental health disorders, as well as on the use of mental health services provided by schools and campuses. In addition, we describe the role of schools in addressing student mental health concerns. We outline a conceptual model for guiding the evaluation of SMH programs. We also touch on issues related to the evaluation of cross-system collaborations that can influence students' access to resources and services. Finally, we review some of the challenges associated with evaluating SMH programs.

The literature on evaluating SMH programs suggests that such programs can be effective. Evaluations examining short-term changes in knowledge, skills, and attitudes resulting from SMH programs have consistently shown that such programs can improve staff, faculty, and student knowledge of mental illness; skills for identifying and referring students with symptoms; and attitudes toward mental illness (Kelly et al., 2011; Rodgers, 2010; Reis and Cornell, 2008; Ward, Hunter and Power, 1997; Wyman et al., 2008). A number of studies show that SMH programs can result in intermediate positive changes in staff, faculty, and student behaviors (e.g., Horner, Sugai and Todd, 2005; Sumi, Woodbridge and Javitz, 2012). Evaluation of the long-term effects (e.g., student mental health service utilization, improved student mental health, lower dropout rates) of SMH programs on mental health are less common, but the programs that do show effects (e.g., Botvin et al., 1995; Botvin et al., 2001; Ellickson et al., 2003; Greenberg et al., 1995; Horner, Sugai and Todd, 2005) are commonly more comprehensive and intensive, of longer duration, are well structured, and attend to key components of implementation.

In addition to reviewing design and measurement issues related to evaluating SMH programs, we also highlight the continuing need for research exploring a full range of outcomes of SMH programs. Although evaluations may often consider structure, process, and short-term outcomes (e.g., knowledge, attitudes, skills), often these are not linked to intermediate student outcomes, such as increased student help-seeking or increases in student referral for mental health services, or long-term student outcomes, such as decreased mental health symptoms. Linking these different outcomes would provide a more comprehensive understanding of the effects of SMH programs.

Footnotes

The research described in this report was prepared for the California Mental Health Services Authority and was conducted within RAND Health, a division of the RAND Corporation.

References

  1. Asarnow, J. R., Jaycox, L. H., Duan, N., LaBorde, A. P., Rea, M. M., Tang, L., Anderson, M., Murray, P., Landon, C., Tang, B., Huizar, D. P., and Wells, K. B., “Depression and Role Impairment Among Adolescents in Primary Care Clinics,” The Journal of Adolescent Health, Vol. 37, No. 6, 2005, pp. 477–483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Botvin, G. J., Schinke, S. P., Epstein, J. A., Diaz, T., and Botvin, E. M., “Effectiveness of Culturally Focused and Generic Skills Training Approaches to Alcohol and Drug-Abuse Prevention Among Minority Adolescents: 2-Year Follow-Up Results,” Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, Vol. 9, No. 3, 1995, pp. 183–194. [Google Scholar]
  3. Botvin, G. J., Griffin, K. W., Diaz, T., and Ifill-Williams, M., “Drug Abuse Prevention Among Minority Adolescents: Posttest and One-Year Follow-up of a School-Based Preventive Intervention,” Prevention Science, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2001, pp. 1–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ellickson, P. L., McCaffrey, D. F., Ghosh-Dastidar, B., and Longshore, D. L., “New Inroads in Preventing Adolescent Drug Use: Results from a Large-Scale Trial of Project Alert in Middle Schools,” American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 93, No. 11, 2003, pp. 1830–1836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Greenberg, M. T., Kusche, C. A., Cook, E. T., and Quamma, J. P., “Promoting Emotional Competence in School-Aged Children: The Effects of the Paths Curriculum,” Development and Psychopathology, Vol. 7, No. 1, 1995, pp. 117–136. [Google Scholar]
  6. Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., and Todd, A. W., “School-Wide Positive Behavior Support,” in Bambara, L. and Kern L., eds., Individualized Supports for Students with Problem Behaviors: Designing Positive Behavior Plans, New York: Guilford Press, 2005, pp. 359–390. [Google Scholar]
  7. Jaycox, L. H., Stein, B. D., Paddock, S., Miles, J. N., Chandra, A., Meredith, L. S., Tanielian, T., Hickey, S., and Burnam, M. A., “Impact of Teen Depression on Academic, Social, and Physical Functioning,” Pediatrics, Vol. 124, No. 4, 2009, pp. 596–605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kelly, C. M., Mithen, J. M., Fischer, J. A., Kitchener, B. A., Jorm, A. F., Lowe, A., and Scanlan, C., “Youth Mental Health First Aid: A Description of the Program and an Initial Evaluation,” International Journal of Mental Health Systems, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2011, p. 4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kessler, R. C., Berglund, P., Demler, O., Jin, R., Merikangas, K. R., and Walters, E. E., “Lifetime Prevalence and Age-of-Onset Distributions of DSM-IV Disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication,” Archives of General Psychiatry, Vol. 62, No. 6, 2005, pp. 593–602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kovacs, M., and Goldston, D., “Cognitive and Social Cognitive-Development of Depressed Children and Adolescents,” Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Vol. 30, No. 3, 1991, pp. 388–392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Merikangas, K. R., He, J. P., Brody, D., Fisher, P. W., Bourdon, K., and Koretz, D. S., “Prevalence and Treatment of Mental Disorders among U.S. Children in the 2001–2004 Nhanes,” Pediatrics, Vol. 125, No. 1, 2010a, pp. 75–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Merikangas, K. R., He, J. P., Burstein, M., Swanson, S. A., Avenevoli, S., Cui, L., Benjet, C., Georgiades, K., and Swendsen, J., “Lifetime Prevalence of Mental Disorders in U.S. Adolescents: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication—Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A),” Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Vol. 49, No. 10, 2010b, pp. 980–989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Reis, C., and Cornell, D., “An Evaluation of Suicide Gatekeeper Training for School Counselors and Teachers,” Professional School Counseling, Vol. 11, No. 6, 2008, pp. 386–394. [Google Scholar]
  14. Renouf, A. G., Kovacs, M., and Mukerji, P., “Relationship of Depressive, Conduct, and Comorbid Disorders and Social Functioning in Childhood,” Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Vol. 36, No. 7, 1997, pp. 998–1004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rodgers, P., Review of the Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training Program (ASIST), LivingWorks Education, Inc., 2010. [Google Scholar]
  16. Sumi, W. C., Woodbridge, M. W., and Javitz, H. S., “Assessing the Effectiveness of First Step to Success: Are Short-Term Results the First Step to Long-Term Behavioral Improvements?” Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 2012.
  17. Ward, J., Hunter, G., and Power, R., “Peer Education as a Means of Drug Prevention and Education among Young People: An Evaluation,” Health Education Journal, Vol. 56, No. 3, 1997, pp. 251–263. [Google Scholar]
  18. Wyman, P. A., Brown, C. H., Inman, J., Cross, W., Schmeelk-Cone, K., Guo, J., and Pena, J. B., “Randomized Trial of a Gatekeeper Program for Suicide Prevention: 1-Year Impact on Secondary School Staff,” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Vol. 76, No. 1, 2008, pp. 104–115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Rand Health Quarterly are provided here courtesy of The RAND Corporation

RESOURCES