Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Immigr Minor Health. 2017 Dec;19(6):1404–1411. doi: 10.1007/s10903-016-0358-6

Social Environmental Influences on Smoking and Cessation: Qualitative Perspectives among Chinese-Speaking Smokers and Nonsmokers in California

Anne Saw 1, Debora Paterniti 2, Lei-Chun Fung 3, Janice Y Tsoh 4, Moon S Chen Jr 5, Elisa Tong 5
PMCID: PMC5052086  NIHMSID: NIHMS760027  PMID: 26872641

Abstract

This qualitative study examines the environmental influences on smoking and cessation from the perspectives of Chinese smokers and household nonsmokers in California. Seven focus groups were conducted with 63 participants. Three culturally influenced levels of potential intervention emerged from constant comparative analysis. At the individual level, participants focused more on irritating odor than health harms of exposure and had inaccurate beliefs about harms of smoking and cessation. At the relational level, peers kept smokers connected to pro-smoking norms. There was conflict in the home about smoking and failed cessation, but smokers recognized the benefits of cessation for family harmony and children’s health. Physicians encouraged cessation but this tended to be insufficient to prompt action unless a smoker felt ill. At the societal level, participants recognized changes in social acceptability and environmental regulation of smoking upon immigration. Better implementation of smokefree policies, plus culturally nuanced strategies for equipping both nonsmokers and smokers to become smokefree, are needed.

Keywords: tobacco use, secondhand smoke, cessation, Chinese American

INTRODUCTION

Although tobacco control efforts have drastically reduced smoking prevalence in the United States in the last five decades, tobacco use remains the leading cause of preventable death and disease in the U.S. and worldwide (1). Certain population subgroups continue to suffer disproportionately (2; 3). Chinese Americans are the largest Asian ethnic group, and about two-thirds are foreign born (4). In California, Chinese men who immigrated from Asia or the Pacific Islands smoke at 22.4% (5). A previous survey of Chinese Californians found that Cantonese-speaking men smoke at higher rates than Chinese Californian men (21.7% vs. 14.3%) (6). By comparison, the prevalence of smoking among Californian adults at large is 11.4% (7). The high smoking rates, especially among recent immigrants, is not surprising given that in China, half to two-thirds of all adult males smoke; on the other hand, women have very low smoking prevalence rates (2.4–3.2%) (8; 9). Additionally, nearly three-quarters of nonsmokers in China experience effects from secondhand smoke (SHS) at home (2).

Smoking is heavily influenced by social and environmental influences, including cultural and gender norms (10; 11). Previous research has documented that both smokers and nonsmokers in China have limited knowledge about the health harms of tobacco use and SHS exposure (12) and hold inaccurate beliefs about the health risks of smoking and the consequences of cessation (e.g., that quitting causes health problems) (13). In Chinese culture, smoking with others is seen as a way to foster relationships between family members, peers, and business associates, particularly for men (11; 14).

In the United States, where widespread smokefree public policies have influenced norms against smoking (16), Chinese immigrant smokers may face societal pressure to refrain from smoking in public and nonsmokers may seek to enforce these smokefree norms in the home. The current study examines perspectives on smoking and cessation behaviors among Cantonese-speaking Chinese American smokers and nonsmokers across different environmental contexts. Chinese American immigrants, who by nature of being exposed to two cultures with different norms on smoking, may help highlight these social and environmental influences in behavior change.

THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

The present study is grounded in the Health Behavior Framework (HBF) (17), which synthesizes several behavioral health models, including the Theory of Planned Behavior (18), Transtheoretical Model of Change (1921), Health Belief Model (22), Social Cognitive Theory (23), and Social Influence Theory (24). HBF takes into consideration the context within which health behaviors occur, including the influence of multiple environmental contexts. The model considers individual factors (e.g., knowledge, communication with provider, health beliefs) and relational factors, including provider and health care system factors (e.g., provider characteristics, health care setting) as barriers or facilitators of intended health behaviors. Furthermore, as applied to smoking and cessation behaviors, HBF takes into account the influences of cultural factors and beliefs.

METHODS

Study Recruitment and Design

The current study was conducted using a community-based participatory research approach. Community feedback into all aspects of the study were discussed with the San Francisco Chinese Council, a consortium of providers, researchers, and advocates. Participant recruitment and the study implementation was conducted at the Chinatown Public Health Center (CPHC, the community partner), a San Francisco county clinic serving predominantly Cantonese-speaking Chinese immigrants. Human subjects approval was obtained through the institutional review board at UC Davis, and informed consent was obtained from each participant prior to study participation.

Cantonese-speaking men and women, 18 years or older, were recruited through advertisements in the local Chinese media, community organizations, and the clinic. To ensure diverse perspectives on smoke exposure, current and former smokers and never smokers were recruited for participation in focus groups. Four focus groups included participants who were recruited as pairs within the same household, though the smoker and the household nonsmoker participated in separate focus groups. Three focus groups (one never smoker only group and two current or former smoker only groups) included participants recruited separately from their household partner. Each focus group consisted of 8–10 participants (mean=9). Each participant received $40 for participation in the interview. Before the interview, participants completed a brief questionnaire including demographic questions.

Guiding questions for the interviews focused on the contexts supporting smoking and cessation behaviors (for current and former smokers), smoke exposure (for both smokers and nonsmokers), understanding of health harms of smoking and smoke exposure (for both smokers and nonsmokers), and how smoke exposure is related to cessation experiences (for both smokers and nonsmokers). All focus groups were conducted by the third author who is a senior health educator with more than 30 years of experience working with and conducting focus groups in the Chinese community.

Data Analysis

Research staff who are bilingual in Chinese and English first translated the focus group interviews into English, then checked the translated transcripts with the audio recordings for accuracy. Data analysis was guided by the HBF and involved a modified grounded theory approach of constant comparative analysis (25), wherein analytic themes were generated independently, then refined and agreed upon in study team meetings by group discussion. The moderator worked closely with the study team in constructing the guiding questions and reviewing the results of each focus group, so that underdeveloped or unexplored themes could be explored further using more refined interview probes, which were generated during study team meetings. Focus group interviews stopped after the seventh focus group, when no new themes emerged and when the study team had no remaining questions, reaching consensus on the meaning and importance of analytic categories.

RESULTS

Participant Characteristics

We conducted seven focus groups with a total of 63 participants. Our sample included 37 smokers (32 current smokers who reported smoking in the past 30 days and 5 former smokers who reported having stopped smoking for at least one month) and 26 never smokers. In this paper, the term “smokers” will be used to reference both current and former smokers, and “nonsmokers” will be used to reference never smokers. Of the smokers, 97.30% (n = 36) were male. Of the nonsmokers, 92.31% (n = 24) were female. Smokers’ average age was 58 years (SD = 10.93). Nonsmokers’ average age was 53.58 years (SD = 11.08). Age was missing for two nonsmoking participants and one smoking participant. The average time lived in the United States was 11.49 years (SD = 11.63) among smokers and 8.95 years (SD = 5.95) among nonsmokers. Time lived in the US was missing for one smoking participant. All participants were immigrants from China (including the Mainland and Hong Kong). Among the 17 nonsmokers who were recruited in household dyads with a smoker, two were the father of a smoker, one was the brother of a smoker, and the remaining 14 were the wife of a smoker.

Overview of Themes

The constant comparative analysis yielded nine themes, which were consistent across smokers and nonsmokers and were summarized with subcategories in Table 1. Table 1 also provides sample illustrative quotes from smokers and nonsmokers in support of each theme.

Table 1.

Themes and Examples from Focus Groups with Smokers and Nonsmokers

Social or
environmental
factor
addressed
Theme Sample Quotes from
Smokers
Sample Quotes from
Nonsmokers
Individual Focus on irritating
odor effects from
smoking and
smoke exposure
“I haven’t smoked at home
these several years, because
the place is relatively small,
when I smoke inside my
room, the smoke diffuses
outdoor to other rooms. My
children are disgusted about
this since they are
nonsmokers.”

“It is better to smoke in the
backyard, because the area
is bigger and the smell of
the cigarette will not
remain.”
“I dislike that smell [of
cigarettes]. I am afraid of
it. I nag [my husband]
frequently, “For goodness
sake please don’t smoke!
The whole house is filled
with the smell of
cigarettes.” I am really
afraid to smell that kind of
odor.”

“[My husband] smokes
outside, but the smell will
diffuse in. If the wind is
strong, it will blow into the
house. He leaves the door
opened when he smokes
and the smell is carried
along with the wind.”
Focus on harm to
smoker
“Everyone knows it is bad
to smoke…we ourselves
know it is bad to smoke
too.”

“Relatives, such as my wife
and my daughter, brothers
and sisters, they urged me
not to smoke. When I
smoked in the past, some
relatives brought me
cigarettes from Hong Kong.
Since I had the resource, I
couldn’t quit. Eventually
they stopped bringing me
cigarettes, and said that it
was bad for my health.”
“[My husband] is now
smoking increasingly
intense, which is, when he
gets up every morning
from bed, he coughs hard
and coughs for half an
hour. I told him, ‘How
about not smoking? You
are coughing very hard!
How about quit smoking!’
He did not answer. I said,
‘You smoke and will do
harm to your lungs.’ Now
my son smokes too. I said,
‘Look! You both smoke
together! Stuffed the whole
house with the smell of
cigarette smoke.’”
Beliefs that
smoking is
healthful and
quitting is harmful
“I have seen a couple of
friends who came from
China and lived here for a
couple of years. They
suddenly quit smoking. I
asked, “Quitting smoking so
suddenly, will not there be
problems?” Less than three
months later, they really got
diabetes. Now, they have to
use adult diapers and even
live in senior centers!” (Pair
#1)
“[My husband] said,
‘During SARS infection, a
lot of people are infected
but smokers are not.’ He
said, ‘Smoking prevents
being infected.’” (Pair #1)

“After quitting, his last
attempt, he had another try
before coming to America.
However, for some
unknown reason, his nose
bled and scared his mother.
She said, ‘Why don’t you
smoke a cigarette
immediately.’ He smoked
and the bleeding was over.
Since then, he smoked
even more! 3 packs a day!”
Beliefs that
quitting requires
determination and
willpower
“It is a psychological
addiction. Being determined
should get you to quit.”

“Determination is very
important. You don’t look at
it, don’t smoke it, don’t buy,
and stay away from
smokers.”

“Only if the person is
determined, they should be
able to quit easily.”
“My husband said if you
are determined to quit
smoking, you do not need
anything. We got the
nicotine patch from the
health center and only used
a few, my husband quit
smoking. He said those
who cannot quit are just
lying to themselves.”

“I have 2 relatives… they
said quit and they quit!
They said to quit in a
week, and they did it. It is
simple. Determination!”
Relational Co-workers or
friends keep
smokers
connected to pro-
smoking norms of
their home culture
“After I quit for a year,
since we were working, a lot
of our coworkers smoked.
Almost everyone smoked in
there, 9 out of 10 smoked.
So in the factory, there was
a room with a lot of people,
approximately 20 to 30
people. Everyone was
smoking and so I smoked
again.” (Pair #10)

“When I was trying to quit,
however, when I was
working, co-worker said to
me, ‘Hey! Are you okay?
Not smoking? Then what
will you do during the 3:15
break? Come on!’ And then
they gave you a cigarette.
After I smoked, ‘Oops! I
smoke again!’ This was the
worst!” (Pair #8)
“I think the environment is
really important. Maybe
promote to co-workers to
come and quit smoking
together.” (Pair #10)

“[My husband] used to
smoke. He said, ‘Smoking
that cigarette is to make
friends.’”

I asked him to quit and he
listened briefly for a while,
quitting smoking on and
off. (His quitting method is
just not to smoke?) That is
smoked for a while and
then stop. As long as
someone hands him a
cigarette, he will take it
and start smoking again.
(Pair #8)
Relational:
Home
environment
Conflict with
household
nonsmoker about
smoking
“Family members should
not blame you, but provide
support, speaking
reasonably. I want to quit
because I want to prepare a
good environment for the
grandchildren. This method
is very good. If you scold
me, I will not listen. But if
you tell me the reasons
behind and encourage me,
then I will be
convinced….You scold me;
men will not listen to you.
You scold me? I will rebel
more.”
“My husband smokes but I
do not like it. As he steps
into the doorstep, he
secretly smokes. As soon
as he stepped in, I could
smell the cigarettes smoke
on him. I dislike it and I
will cough. I said, ‘You
have to quit smoking.’ He
said, ‘No. I am only
smoking three a day. It is
not a lot.’ I said, ‘Three is
not a lot? Don’t live here.
Move out and live
somewhere else. I don’t
like you smoking.’” (You
asked him to move out)
“Yes. I said, ‘You move
out. I don’t like you
smoking.’” (What happens
next? Did he move out?)
“No. How can he move
out? He needs me to cook
food for him to eat … such
person as him, very
difficult.”
Smoking cessation
improves family
harmony and
benefits children
“I should prepare a space for
the grandchild and next
generations, otherwise, they
will suffer from second-
hand smoking. As a lot of
people say, ‘They breathe it
in and it’s not good for
them.’”

“My daughter was just born,
that’s why I quit smoking.
This is all for the child.”
“And he said, ‘Smoking is
not good for me, and not
good for my family too.’
Everyone knows that. But
he can’t quit.”

“The kids are small and we
are afraid that the smoke
will affect their health.”
Relational:
Healthcare
environment
Communication
with providers
insufficient to
counter pro-
smoking norms
and myths
“I have smoked for more
than 40 years. I saw doctor
around 10 years ago. My
doctor did a checkup for me
and said, “Don’t smoke
anymore! You can’t go on!”
Then I starting quitting, kept
quitting for a couple years,
and then I smoked again.
(How serious was it at that
time?) Cough, bronchitis, so
he said, “You should not
smoke!” I said, “Warning,
doctor’s warning.” Then I
quit. After I quit for a year
and a half, I smoked again.
After I smoked again, that
thing was not going well
again. My family said, “Do
not smoke anymore!” Then I
quit again. However, now
when my relatives give me a
cigarette, I will smoke
again, but not craving for
it.”
“Health professionals
should give smokers
information and let them
know that how smoking
can harm family
members.”

“Unless you are sick, then
when the doctor explain to
you, then it might be
helpful. But for my
husband, he is fine and is
not sick, he eventually
continues to smoke.”
Societal Acceptability of
smoking depends
on social context
“Now in the States, needless
to say, ladies would cover
their mouth with their hands
as soon as you smoke.”

“Some people wave their
hands, turn their head away
or avoid me.”
“After immigrating to the
United States, not as many
people smoke, so over time
[my husband] has cut back
on smoking.”

“My son smokes…He
smokes a few packs per
day while he was in
Mainland China, but after
he arrived here for 3 or 5
years, everyone
encouraged him to quit
smoking. Now he is
smoking gradually less, he
tried to decrease smoking
as hard as he could.”

Note: Perspectives within the same household dyad on the same theme are noted by the identical pair number listed in parentheses following a quote.

Focus on irritating odor from smoking and smoke exposure

Participants had varying degrees of understanding about the health effects of smoking and SHS exposure, regardless of smoking status. Most participants focused on the irritating odor from smoking and SHS exposure. Negative comments about smoking were almost exclusively focused on the smell of cigarettes and the lingering odor on clothes and in the air.

Focus on harms of smoking to smoker not nonsmokers

When smokers or nonsmokers described other negative consequences of smoking, they concentrated mainly on health harms for the smoker but not household members impacted by SHS exposure. At the same time, some participants acknowledged that SHS exposure could negatively impact the health of children in terms of allergies, asthma, or other respiratory discomforts.

Beliefs that smoking is healthful and quitting is harmful

Rather than accurate information about smoking consequences to motivate cessation, it was often inaccurate beliefs about smoking and quitting that pervaded the discussions for both smokers and nonsmokers and discouraged cessation. A recurrent theme in responses about how long it takes for SHS to affect one’s health was that it depends on the weakness of the person’s immune system or health. Participants stated that many Chinese smokers believe they will live a long life regardless of how much they smoke, citing Mao Zedong (the founder of the People’s Republic of China) as someone who chain-smoked yet lived past age 80. Comments about how quitting could be harmful were evident in participants’ examples of how relatives got sick or died after a quit attempt.

Beliefs that quitting requires determination and willpower

Most participants reported that a smoker’s ability to quit smoking depended on their determination. Those who could not quit were perceived as too weak-willed to overcome their addiction, and those who quit were portrayed as simply deciding to quit. One wife of a smoker stated her belief that quitting ultimately takes determination since the addiction is psychological. Her smoking husband stated, “In reality, everyone has the determination for three months. However, the determination will decrease after three months.” Though he also believed that determination was the key to cessation, he reflected on several occasions how easy it was for him to relapse when he made quit attempts.

Co-workers or friends keep smokers connected to pro-smoking norms

Many of the participants in the sample worked in ethnic businesses such as restaurants and factories. There, among coworkers, smoking was seen as a way to increase social harmony. Nonsmokers and smokers reflected on the workplace as a context that encourages smoking since other ethnic peers smoke. As one smoker stated, “offering you a cigarette demonstrates friendship, is a way of interaction. In the past, if you did not offer a cigarette when you came across a friend, it made you feel guilty.”

Conflict with household nonsmoker about smoking

Smokers and nonsmokers stated that smoking was a source of conflict as household members attempted to negotiate the household environment, marital relationships, and parent-child relationships. No smokers stated that their nonsmoking household members condoned their smoking behaviors and all nonsmokers voiced their displeasure about the smoking behaviors of their household members. Many smokers reported feeling pressure from family members to refrain from smoking inside the home and responded by smoking outside the home and by cutting back on smoking. Some nonsmoking household members expressed their frustration at smokers’ inability to quit but verbal conflicts about smoking in the house did not necessarily have the desired effect for nonsmoking household members. Whereas these verbal conflicts were successful in motivating some smokers to reduce or quit smoking, other smokers reacted by smoking outside the home, sometimes in secret.

Family harmony and benefit for children

Though many smokers reported feeling nagged to quit smoking, they understood that refraining from smoking—especially in the home—was one important way to increase relational harmony. Furthermore, some smokers stated their understanding of the value of cessation to protect their family members from SHS exposure. Comments focused on protecting adult nonsmokers from SHS exposure, however, were quite uncommon. Rather, it was more common for smokers and household members of smokers to focus on smoking as an annoying or odoriferous behavior.

Healthcare environment insufficient to counter pro-smoking norms and myths

Several smokers reported seeing medical providers when they were sick (usually related to heavy coughing) and being counseled to quit and improve their health, yet most reported being unable to sustain cessation. Generally, when smokers were acutely ill and were advised to quit smoking by medical providers, they did so. However, once they were no longer sick, and especially if they continued to socialize in environments with pro-smoking norms, smokers returned to smoking and rationalized their behaviors. Notably, few smokers discussed taking or being advised to take medications (e.g., nicotine gum or patches) to aid in cessation.

Acceptability of smoking depends on social context

Both smokers and nonsmokers were aware that smoking in public was not viewed favorably. Several smokers commented that their smoking was sometimes met with negative nonverbal reactions, such as people covering their noses and mouths. Such reactions made impacts on some smokers; one smoker reported putting out his cigarette, while others reported reducing cigarette consumption. Participants contrasted perceptions of smoking in the United States compared to China. Nonsmokers noted that their smoking household members cut back or quit smoking only after immigrating to the United States and several stated that visiting China often created opportunities to relapse or increase smoking intensity.

DISCUSSION

This qualitative study enhances our understanding of barriers and facilitators of smoking and cessation within different social environments for Chinese immigrant male smokers through examining the perspectives of smokers and nonsmokers. Although some contexts, such as the household and healthcare contexts, encourage cessation, Chinese immigrant male smokers also are encouraged to smoke because of health beliefs, social norms, and social practices with which they immigrated and which are maintained through ties with ethnic coworkers and friends and through visits back to China.

Limited knowledge about SHS health harms and cultural beliefs about smoking need to be addressed for Chinese populations. Previous qualitative research conducted in China demonstrates that smokers have poor knowledge about health harms, and in fact believe that smoking cessation is harmful and will result in a loss of social connections (13). Willpower has also been cited as the main determinant for cessation in qualitative studies of Chinese American smokers and other Asians in California (26) and other states (27; 28); however, willpower alone does not account for the addictive nature of tobacco use and that support with counseling and medication can increase cessation. Our participants demonstrated similar beliefs: focusing on odor rather than health concerns, acknowledging that smokers felt obligated to accept cigarettes to maintain social harmony, and stating willpower was the key to cessation.

Smokers in our study spoke in-depth about their concern for maintaining relational harmony in the household context and protecting children from SHS. A prevailing finding was that smokers were willing and had successfully quit on behalf of their children or grandchildren’s health. Concern about SHS affecting the family has also been found among Asian American immigrant men living in Seattle (29). Previous research demonstrates that Chinese-speaking nonsmokers can be proactive in protecting the household environment from SHS exposure by establishing home bans (7; 30), which supports smoking cessation. Chinese and Vietnamese Americans in California cited familial obligation as a motivator to quit smoking (26). Thus, health education efforts should consider raising the value of quitting smoking for the benefits of family members, including spouses, children, and grandchildren in effective smoking cessation messages for Chinese.

Household nonsmokers remain an underutilized resource as many are motivated to support their smokers to quit smoking. For example, the California Smokers’ Helpline, which offers free telephone counseling and educational materials in Asian languages, reported that Asian-speaking Asians had the largest proportion of proxies (callers calling on behalf of smokers) among all callers: 35% for Asian-speaking Asians vs. 5% for English-speaking whites (31). Several interventions, with Chinese and other Asian populations, demonstrate how targeting household nonsmokers can be effective to encourage smokers’ cessation. In China, hospital-based smokefree educational efforts, which taught knowledge and assertive social skills, reduced long-term SHS exposure to pregnant women exposed to SHS (32; 33). In Hong Kong, a brief education intervention to mothers of sick children had a short-term effect in helping smoking fathers quit or reduce daily cigarette consumption (34). Initial acceptability and feasibility for a social network family-focused intervention has been demonstrated for Chinese and Vietnamese American male smokers in a recent study (35). Perception of a family norm toward cessation explained the effectiveness of a culturally tailored smoking cessation intervention for Korean American immigrant smokers that included coaching for family members on assisting smokers (36). Although the household context is a powerful context for promoting behavioral change, nonsmoking household members often lack the tools to effectively support smoking cessation. Therefore, involving household members and teaching them skills to support cessation may be a powerful component of a targeted intervention (37). Among Asian nonsmoking women, SHS different by educational status (38); therefore, women with lower education may particularly need these skills and information.

Smokers and nonsmokers in the current study recognize that smoking is socially unacceptable, yet there are still social contexts, such as the workplace, where smoking is encouraged. Whereas smokers felt pressure from nonsmoking household members to quit, they reported feeling tempted to smoke to get along with others in work. Furthermore, uneven smoking regulations across different environments created barriers to sustained cessation. Many smokers described smoking or being encouraged to smoke at work and some participants work in construction and as such, may not protected by workplace smoking bans. This suggests that although smoking has been banned in indoor workplaces in California since 1995, workplace smoking bans may not be enforced or need to be strengthened by extending it to outside premises. Even among Asian women nonsmokers, smokefree policies at work may need enforcement to eliminate smoke exposure (38).

Healthcare providers might consider addressing the impact of SHS on the family beyond the individual smoker, who may be motivated by messages about their own health only if the smoker feels ill, and exploring cultural beliefs about the benefits of smoking and the harms of quitting. It is also possible that healthcare providers may not be discussing medications or counseling to quit, since Asian smokers are lighter smokers and providers are less likely to advise about quitting (39). Healthcare providers should consider how to educate household nonsmokers on the harms of smoking to the lungs of young children and grandchildren in supporting the smoker to quit.

Several important limitations should be noted. This study relies on a small sample size recruited from one metropolitan area in California and recruitment efforts were focused on smokers and nonsmokers living with smokers. Therefore, results may not generalize to smokers living alone and other communities. The vast majority of nonsmokers in the study were the wife of a smoker. Future research should explore perspectives on smoking and cessation among male nonsmokers as well as smoker and nonsmokers from other cultures, and the influence and enforcement of smokefree policies that might facilitate smoking cessation.

NEW CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE LITERATURE

The current study highlights different ways in which social and environmental contexts influence smoking and cessation behaviors. Results demonstrate that because Chinese American immigrants are frequently confronted with different sets of cultural and social norms, one from their country of origin, one from the U.S., how these norms exert their influence on smoking behavior varies depending on the social and environmental context. Household nonsmokers living with smokers may need assistance in anticipating and supporting the smoker’s challenges with cessation to reduce household conflict. Cultural tailoring of smoking cessation interventions such as those that emphasize the importance of cessation for the sake of the next generation should address these social and environmental dynamics particularly in the home.

Acknowledgments

Funding: This study was funded by American Cancer Society (grant number 119442-RSGT-10-114-01-CPPB), National Cancer Institute's Center to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities (grant number U54 CA153499), and the National Institute on Drug Abuse (grant number L30 DA034563).

Footnotes

Dr. Saw declares she has no conflict of interest. Dr. Paterniti declares she has no conflict of interest. Ms. Fung declares she has no conflict of interest. Dr. Tsoh declares she has no conflict of interest. Dr. Chen declares he has no conflict of interest. Dr. Tong declares she has no conflict of interest.

Compliance with Ethical Standards:

Ethical approval: All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  • 1.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2014. The Health Consequences of Smoking: 50 Years of Progress. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.World Health Organization. World Health Organization; 2009. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic 2009: implementing smoke-free environments. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fiore MC, Jaen CR, Baker TB, Bailey WC, Benowitz NL, et al. Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update. Rockville, MD: Public Health Service; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hoeffel EM, Rostogi S, Kim MO, Shahid H. Rep. US Census C2010BR-11. U.S. Census Bureau; 2012. The Asian Population: 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.UCLA Center for Health Policy Research. AskCHIS 2014. Smoking status - current, former, and never. 2014 [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Carr K, Beers M, Kassebaum T, Chen MS. California Chinese American Tobacco Use Survey - 2004. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Health Services; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.California Department of Public Health. California Adult Smoking Rate Reaches Historic Low. http://www.cdph.ca.gov/Pages/NR11-031.aspx.
  • 8.World Health Organization. WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2015. China: 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chen Z, Peto R, Zhou M, Iona A, Smith M, et al. Contrasting male and female trends in tobacco-attributed mortality in China: evidence from successive nationwide prospective cohort studies. Lancet. 2015;386:1447–1456. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00340-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Unger JB, Cruz T, Baezconde-Garbanati L, Shakib S, Palmer P, et al. Exploring the cultural context of tobacco use: a transdisciplinary framework. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2003;5:S101–S117. doi: 10.1080/14622200310001625546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mao A, Bristow K, Robinson J. Caught in a dilemma: why do non-smoking women in China support the smoking behaviors of men in their families? Health Education Research. 2013;28:153–164. doi: 10.1093/her/cys078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jin Y, Wang L, Lu B, Ferketich A. Secondhand smoke exposure, indoor smoking bans and smoking-related knowledge in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2014;11:12835. doi: 10.3390/ijerph111212835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhang J-Y, Chan SS-C, Fong DY-T, Malone RE, Lam T-H. The social context of smoking cessation in China: an exploratory interview study. Tobacco Control. 2012;21:57–58. doi: 10.1136/tc.2010.040691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ma S, Hoang M-A, Samet JM, Wang J, Mei C, et al. Myths and attitudes that sustain smoking in China. Journal of Health Communication. 2008;13:654–666. doi: 10.1080/10810730802412222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rich ZC, Xiao S. Tobacco as a social currency: cigarette gifting and sharing in China. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2012;14:258–263. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntr156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Alamar B, Glantz SA. Effect of increased social unacceptability of cigarette smoking on reduction in cigarette consumption. Am. J. Public Health. 2006;96:1359–1363. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.069617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bastani R, Glenn BA, Taylor VM, Chen MS, Jr, Nguyen TT, et al. Integrating theory into community interventions to reduce liver cancer disparities: The Health Behavior Framework. Preventive Medicine. 2010;50:63–67. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.08.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991;50:179–211. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Transtheoretical therapy: toward a more integrative model of change. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice. 1982;19:276. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1983;51:390–395. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.51.3.390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Prochaska JO, Redding CA, Evers KE. The transtheoretical model and stages of change. In: Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer B, editors. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer; 2002. pp. 99–120. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rosenstock IM, Strecher VJ, Becker MH. Social learning theory and the health belief model. Health Education & Behavior. 1988;15:175–183. doi: 10.1177/109019818801500203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc; 1986. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mittman BS, Tonesk X, Jacobson PD. Implementing clinical practice guidelines: social influence strategies and practitioner behavior change. QRB. Quality Review Bulletin. 1992;18:413–422. doi: 10.1016/s0097-5990(16)30567-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine; 1967. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tsang IK, Tsoh JY, Wong C, Le K, Cheng JW, et al. Understanding and use of nicotine replacement therapy and nonpharmacologic smoking cessation strategies among Chinese and Vietnamese smokers and their families. Preventing Chronic Disease. 2014;11:E26. doi: 10.5888/pcd11.130299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fu SS, Burgess D, van Ryn M, Hatsukami DK, Solomon J, Joseph AM. Views on smoking cessation methods in ethnic minority communities: a qualitative investigation. Preventive Medicine. 2007;44:235–240. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Spigner C, Yip MP, Huang B, Tu SP. Chinese and Vietnamese adult male smokers' perspectives regarding facilitators of tobacco cessation behavior. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2007;8:429–435. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Spigner C, Shigaki A, Tu SP. Perceptions of Asian American men about tobacco cigarette consumption: a social learning theory framework. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health. 2005l;7:293–303. doi: 10.1007/s10903-005-5126-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Shelley D, Nguyen N, Yerneni R, Fahs M. Tobacco Use Behaviors and Household Smoking Bans Among Chinese Americans. American Journal of Health Promotion. 2008;22:168–175. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.22.3.168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhu SH, Nguyen QB, Cummins S, Wong S, Wightman V. Non-smokers seeking help for smokers: a preliminary study. Tobacco Control. 2006;15:107–113. doi: 10.1136/tc.2005.012401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lee AH. A pilot intervention for pregnant women in Sichuan, China on passive smoking. Patient Education and Counseling. 2008;71:396–401. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.03.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yang L, Tong EK, Mao Z, Hu T-w, Lee AH. A clustered randomized controlled trial to reduce secondhand smoke exposure among nonsmoking pregnant women in Sichuan Province, China. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2015 doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Chan SSC, Leung GM, Wong DCN, Lam T-H. Helping Chinese fathers quit smoking through educating their nonsmoking spouses: a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Health Promotion. 2008;23:31–34. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.07043040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tsoh JY, Burke NJ, Gildengorin G, Wong C, Le K, et al. A social network family-focused intervention to promote smoking cessation in Chinese and Vietnamese American male smokers: a feasibility study. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2015;17:1029–1038. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kim SS, Kim S-H, Fang H, Kwon S, Shelley D, Ziedonis D. A culturally adapted smoking cessation intervention for Korean Americans: a mediating effect of perceived family norm toward quitting. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health. 2015;17:1120–1129. doi: 10.1007/s10903-014-0045-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hovell MF, Hughes SC. The behavioral ecology of secondhand smoke exposure: a pathway to complete tobacco control. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2009;11:1254–1264. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntp133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tong EK, Tang H, Tsoh J, Wong C, Chen MS., Jr Smoke-free policies among Asian-American women. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2009;37:S144–S150. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Tong EK, Tang H, Chen MS, McPhee SJ. Provider smoking cessation advice among California Asian-American smokers. American Journal of Health Promotion. 2011;25:S70–S74. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.100611-QUAN-186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES