Skip to main content
PMC home page
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 1995 Sep;79(9):802–806. doi: 10.1136/bjo.79.9.802

Modulation of amblyopia therapy following early surgery for unilateral congenital cataracts.

I C Lloyd 1, J G Dowler 1, A Kriss 1, L Speedwell 1, D A Thompson 1, I Russell-Eggitt 1, D Taylor 1
PMCID: PMC505263  PMID: 7488596

Abstract

BACKGROUND--Stimulus deprivation amblyopia is the principal cause of visual impairment in infants with unilateral congenital cataract. Even if lensectomy is undertaken at an early age, intensive postoperative occlusion of the phakic eye is essential for the development of useful vision in the aphakic eye. Despite this, the optimum method of regulating occlusion therapy is uncertain. METHODS--Interocular acuity differences identified using clinical preferential looking techniques (Keeler cards) were used to regulate target levels of phakic eye occlusion in a prospective evaluation of 10 systemically, metabolically, and neurologically normal infants in whom dense unilateral cataract was diagnosed before 8 weeks of age, and operated upon by 10 weeks. Actual occlusion levels were recorded each day by parents in a diary. The development of preferential looking acuity in the phakic and aphakic eye were compared with prediction intervals derived from observations on 43 normal children. RESULTS--Aphakic eye preferential looking acuities were within the normal range at last review in all but one infant. Interocular acuity differences were < or = 0.5 octave in all children older than 1 year of age at last review, and > or = 1 octave in three of four children less than 1 year old at last review (Fisher exact p = 0.033). Phakic eye acuities were within the normal range in all infants at all visits. CONCLUSION--Within the first 2 years of life, normal preferential looking acuity may be achieved in both eyes of infants undergoing early surgery for unilateral congenital cataract if occlusion therapy is modulated according to interocular acuity differences quantified by clinical preferential looking techniques.

Full text

PDF
802

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beller R., Hoyt C. S., Marg E., Odom J. V. Good visual function after neonatal surgery for congenital monocular cataracts. Am J Ophthalmol. 1981 May;91(5):559–565. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(81)90053-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BenEzra D., Paez J. H. Congenital cataract and intraocular lenses. Am J Ophthalmol. 1983 Sep;96(3):311–314. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)77820-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Birch E. E., Stager D. R., Wright W. W. Grating acuity development after early surgery for congenital unilateral cataract. Arch Ophthalmol. 1986 Dec;104(12):1783–1787. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1986.01050240057040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Birch E. E., Swanson W. H., Stager D. R., Woody M., Everett M. Outcome after very early treatment of dense congenital unilateral cataract. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993 Dec;34(13):3687–3699. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown A. M., Yamamoto M. Visual acuity in newborn and preterm infants measured with grating acuity cards. Am J Ophthalmol. 1986 Aug 15;102(2):245–253. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(86)90153-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Catalano R. A., Simon J. W., Jenkins P. L., Kandel G. L. Preferential looking as a guide for amblyopia therapy in monocular infantile cataracts. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1987 Mar-Apr;24(2):56–63. doi: 10.3928/0191-3913-19870301-03. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chandna A. Natural history of the development of visual acuity in infants. Eye (Lond) 1991;5(Pt 1):20–26. doi: 10.1038/eye.1991.4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cheng K. P., Hiles D. A., Biglan A. W., Pettapiece M. C. Visual results after early surgical treatment of unilateral congenital cataracts. Ophthalmology. 1991 Jun;98(6):903–910. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(91)32203-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Drummond G. T., Scott W. E., Keech R. V. Management of monocular congenital cataracts. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989 Jan;107(1):45–51. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1989.01070010047025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ellis G. S., Jr, Hartmann E. E., Love A., May J. G., Morgan K. S. Teller acuity cards versus clinical judgment in the diagnosis of amblyopia with strabismus. Ophthalmology. 1988 Jun;95(6):788–791. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(88)33105-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gregg F. M., Parks M. M. Stereopsis after congenital monocular cataract extraction. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992 Sep 15;114(3):314–317. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)71797-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hiles D. A. Visual acuities of monocular IOL and non-IOL aphakic children. Ophthalmology. 1980 Dec;87(12):1296–1300. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(80)35092-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hiles D. A., Wallar P. H. Visual results following infantile cataract surgery. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1977 Winter;17(4):265–282. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jacobson S. G., Mohindra I., Held R. Development of visual acuity in infants with congenital cataracts. Br J Ophthalmol. 1981 Oct;65(10):727–735. doi: 10.1136/bjo.65.10.727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lewis T. L., Maurer D., Tytla M. E., Bowering E. R., Brent H. P. Vision in the "good" eye of children treated for unilateral congenital cataract. Ophthalmology. 1992 Jul;99(7):1013–1017. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(92)31857-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lloyd I. C., Goss-Sampson M., Jeffrey B. G., Kriss A., Russell-Eggitt I., Taylor D. Neonatal cataract: aetiology, pathogenesis and management. Eye (Lond) 1992;6(Pt 2):184–196. doi: 10.1038/eye.1992.37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lorenz B., Wörle J. Visual results in congenital cataract with the use of contact lenses. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1991;229(2):123–132. doi: 10.1007/BF00170543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mayer D. L., Moore B., Robb R. M. Assessment of vision and amblyopia by preferential looking tests after early surgery for unilateral congenital cataracts. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1989 Mar-Apr;26(2):61–68. doi: 10.3928/0191-3913-19890301-05. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. McDonald M. A., Dobson V., Sebris S. L., Baitch L., Varner D., Teller D. Y. The acuity card procedure: a rapid test of infant acuity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1985 Aug;26(8):1158–1162. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Meiusi R. S., Lavoie J. D., Summers C. G. The effect of grating orientation on resolution acuity in patients with nystagmus. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1993 Jul-Aug;30(4):259–261. doi: 10.3928/0191-3913-19930701-09. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Odom J. V., Hoyt C. S., Marg E. Effect of natural deprivation and unilateral eye patching on visual acuity of infants and children. Evoked potential measurements. Arch Ophthalmol. 1981 Aug;99(8):1412–1416. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1981.03930020286018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pratt-Johnson J. A., Tillson G. Unilateral congenital cataract: binocular status after treatment. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1989 Mar-Apr;26(2):72–75. doi: 10.3928/0191-3913-19890301-07. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Preston K. L., McDonald M., Sebris S. L., Dobson V., Teller D. Y. Validation of the acuity card procedure for assessment of infants with ocular disorders. Ophthalmology. 1987 Jun;94(6):644–653. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(87)33398-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Robb R. M., Mayer D. L., Moore B. D. Results of early treatment of unilateral congenital cataracts. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1987 Jul-Aug;24(4):178–181. doi: 10.3928/0191-3913-19870701-07. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Tytla M. E., Lewis T. L., Maurer D., Brent H. P. Stereopsis after congenital cataract. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993 Apr;34(5):1767–1773. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wright K. W., Matsumoto E., Edelman P. M. Binocular fusion and stereopsis associated with early surgery for monocular congenital cataracts. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992 Nov;110(11):1607–1609. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1992.01080230107032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES