Skip to main content
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 1995 Oct;79(10):900–904. doi: 10.1136/bjo.79.10.900

Confocal fundus imaging with a scanning laser ophthalmoscope in eyes with cataract.

C Beckman 1, L Bond-Taylor 1, B Lindblom 1, J Sjöstrand 1
PMCID: PMC505290  PMID: 7488577

Abstract

AIMS/BACKGROUND--The study aimed to determine the influence of increased intraocular light scatter on the contrast in scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO) images and to examine to what extent SLO images can visualise the fundus through media opacities due to cataract. METHODS--Intraocular light scatter was estimated from measurements of letter contrast sensitivity before and after cataract surgery in five eyes. SLO images were obtained before and after surgery using confocal apertures of 1, 2, 4, and 10 mm, at laser wavelengths of 633 and 780 nm. Visibility of the fundus was determined by measurements of retinal contrast. SLO images were compared with standard fundus photographs. RESULTS--SLO images obtained before surgery revealed details of the retina that were unresolvable in the fundus photographs because of light scattering. By using one of the three smallest apertures, image contrast was further improved. However, no simple relations between aperture size, estimated light scatter, and image contrast could be found. CONCLUSION--SLO imaging was found to be superior to fundus photography for viewing the retina in eyes with cataract. Owing to the inhomogeneous nature of cataracts, the optimal choice of confocal aperture and laser wavelength is not simple and must be individualised.

Full text

PDF
900

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beckman C., Hård S., Hård A. L., Sjöstrand J. Comparison of two glare measurement methods through light scattering modeling. Optom Vis Sci. 1992 Jul;69(7):532–537. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hedin A., Olsson K. Letter legibility and the construction of a new visual acuity chart. Ophthalmologica. 1984;189(3):147–156. doi: 10.1159/000309402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Manivannan A., Kirkpatrick J. N., Sharp P. F., Forrester J. V. Clinical investigation of an infrared digital scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Br J Ophthalmol. 1994 Feb;78(2):84–90. doi: 10.1136/bjo.78.2.84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Webb R. H., Hughes G. W. Scanning laser ophthalmoscope. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1981 Jul;28(7):488–492. doi: 10.1109/TBME.1981.324734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES