Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1992 Dec 1;89(23):11264–11268. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.23.11264

Control of gal transcription through DNA looping: inhibition of the initial transcribing complex.

H E Choy 1, S Adhya 1
PMCID: PMC50530  PMID: 1454806

Abstract

Involvement of DNA looping between two spatially separated gal operators, OE and OI, in repression of the gal operon has been demonstrated in vivo. An in vitro transcription assay using a minicircle DNA containing the gal promoter region with lac operators was employed to elucidate the molecular mechanism of repression. Wild-type lac repressors (LacI+ protein molecules), which are capable of associating into a tetramer and forming a DNA loop, repressed transcription from promoter sites P1 and P2, whereas a non-looping lac repressor mutant (LacI(adi)) failed to show normal repression of both of the gal promoters. Thus a DNA loop is also required for repression of transcription in vitro. Repression mediated by DNA looping resulted in the inhibition of the synthesis of complete as well as aborted transcripts, demonstrating that the repressive action was on the formation or activity of the initial transcribing complex. Under similar conditions, the gal repressor (GalR protein) did not repress the gal promoters effectively, apparently because it failed to loop DNA containing gal operators in the purified system. The component(s) or conditions that aid GalR in DNA looping remain to be identified.

Full text

PDF
11264

Images in this article

11265Image
on p.11265
11266Image
on p.11266
11266Image
on p.11266

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adhya S. Multipartite genetic control elements: communication by DNA loop. Annu Rev Genet. 1989;23:227–250. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.23.120189.001303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aiba H., Adhya S., de Crombrugghe B. Evidence for two functional gal promoters in intact Escherichia coli cells. J Biol Chem. 1981 Nov 25;256(22):11905–11910. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Borowiec J. A., Zhang L., Sasse-Dwight S., Gralla J. D. DNA supercoiling promotes formation of a bent repression loop in lac DNA. J Mol Biol. 1987 Jul 5;196(1):101–111. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90513-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brenowitz M., Jamison E., Majumdar A., Adhya S. Interaction of the Escherichia coli Gal repressor protein with its DNA operators in vitro. Biochemistry. 1990 Apr 3;29(13):3374–3383. doi: 10.1021/bi00465a033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brenowitz M., Mandal N., Pickar A., Jamison E., Adhya S. DNA-binding properties of a lac repressor mutant incapable of forming tetramers. J Biol Chem. 1991 Jan 15;266(2):1281–1288. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. De Crombrugghe B., Chen B., Anderson W., Nissley P., Gottesman M., Pastan I., Perlman R. Lac DNA, RNA polymerase and cyclic AMP receptor protein, cyclic AMP, lac repressor and inducer are the essential elements for controlled lac transcription. Nat New Biol. 1971 Jun 2;231(22):139–142. doi: 10.1038/newbio231139a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fritz H. J., Bicknäse H., Gleumes B., Heibach C., Rosahl S., Ehring R. Characterization of two mutations in the Escherichia coli galE gene inactivating the second galactose operator and comparative studies of repressor binding. EMBO J. 1983;2(12):2129–2135. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1983.tb01713.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Goodrich J. A., McClure W. R. Regulation of open complex formation at the Escherichia coli galactose operon promoters. Simultaneous interaction of RNA polymerase, gal repressor and CAP/cAMP. J Mol Biol. 1992 Mar 5;224(1):15–29. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90573-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Irani M. H., Orosz L., Adhya S. A control element within a structural gene: the gal operon of Escherichia coli. Cell. 1983 Mar;32(3):783–788. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90064-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Irani M., Musso R., Adhya S. Cyclic-AMP-dependent switch in initiation of transcription from the two promoters of the Escherichia coli gal operon: identification and assay of 5'-triphosphate ends of mRNA by GTP:RNA guanyltransferase. J Bacteriol. 1989 Mar;171(3):1623–1630. doi: 10.1128/jb.171.3.1623-1630.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Krummel B., Chamberlin M. J. RNA chain initiation by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. Structural transitions of the enzyme in early ternary complexes. Biochemistry. 1989 Sep 19;28(19):7829–7842. doi: 10.1021/bi00445a045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Krämer H., Niemöller M., Amouyal M., Revet B., von Wilcken-Bergmann B., Müller-Hill B. lac repressor forms loops with linear DNA carrying two suitably spaced lac operators. EMBO J. 1987 May;6(5):1481–1491. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02390.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kuhnke G., Krause A., Heibach C., Gieske U., Fritz H. J., Ehring R. The upstream operator of the Escherichia coli galactose operon is sufficient for repression of transcription initiated at the cyclic AMP-stimulated promoter. EMBO J. 1986 Jan;5(1):167–173. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04192.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kuhnke G., Theres C., Fritz H. J., Ehring R. RNA polymerase and gal repressor bind simultaneously and with DNA bending to the control region of the Escherichia coli galactose operon. EMBO J. 1989 Apr;8(4):1247–1255. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03498.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lee J., Goldfarb A. lac repressor acts by modifying the initial transcribing complex so that it cannot leave the promoter. Cell. 1991 Aug 23;66(4):793–798. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90122-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lehming N., Sartorius J., Oehler S., von Wilcken-Bergmann B., Müller-Hill B. Recognition helices of lac and lambda repressor are oriented in opposite directions and recognize similar DNA sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Nov;85(21):7947–7951. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.21.7947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Majumdar A., Adhya S. Demonstration of two operator elements in gal: in vitro repressor binding studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Oct;81(19):6100–6104. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.19.6100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mandal N., Su W., Haber R., Adhya S., Echols H. DNA looping in cellular repression of transcription of the galactose operon. Genes Dev. 1990 Mar;4(3):410–418. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.3.410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Matthews K. S. DNA looping. Microbiol Rev. 1992 Mar;56(1):123–136. doi: 10.1128/mr.56.1.123-136.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Musso R. E., Di Lauro R., Adhya S., de Crombrugghe B. Dual control for transcription of the galactose operon by cyclic AMP and its receptor protein at two interspersed promoters. Cell. 1977 Nov;12(3):847–854. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90283-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nick H., Gilbert W. Detection in vivo of protein-DNA interactions within the lac operon of Escherichia coli. 1985 Feb 28-Mar 6Nature. 313(6005):795–798. doi: 10.1038/313795a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Straney S. B., Crothers D. M. Lac repressor is a transient gene-activating protein. Cell. 1987 Dec 4;51(5):699–707. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90093-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES