Abstract
von Willebrand disease type 2B (VWD-type 2B) is characterized by gain-of-function mutations of von Willebrand factor (vWF) that enhance its binding to platelet glycoprotein Ibα and alter the protein’s multimeric structure. Patients with VWD-type 2B display variable extents of bleeding associated with macrothrombocytopenia and sometimes with thrombopathy. Here, we addressed the molecular mechanism underlying the severe macrothrombocytopenia both in a knockin murine model for VWD-type 2B by introducing the p.V1316M mutation in the murine Vwf gene and in a patient bearing this mutation. We provide evidence of a profound defect in megakaryocyte (MK) function since: (a) the extent of proplatelet formation was drastically decreased in 2B MKs, with thick proplatelet extensions and large swellings; and (b) 2B MKs presented actin disorganization that was controlled by upregulation of the RhoA/LIM kinase (LIMK)/cofilin pathway. In vitro and in vivo inhibition of the LIMK/cofilin signaling pathway rescued actin turnover and restored normal proplatelet formation, platelet count, and platelet size. These data indicate, to our knowledge for the first time, that the severe macrothrombocytopenia in VWD-type 2B p.V1316M is due to an MK dysfunction that originates from a constitutive activation of the RhoA/LIMK/cofilin pathway and actin disorganization. This suggests a potentially new function of vWF during platelet formation that involves regulation of actin dynamics.
Severe macrothombocytopenia in type 2B von Willebrand disease is due to a megakaryocyte dysfunction that originates from constitutive activation of the RhoA/LIMK/Cofilin pathway and actin disorganization.
Introduction
Remodeling of the cytoskeleton is pertinent to the morphological changes that cells have to endure during processes such as cytokinesis, cell polarization, and migration. Actin filament disassembly is a dynamic event involving many cellular components, and among the known filamentous actin (F-actin) severing proteins, the members of the actin-depolymerizing factor (ADF)/cofilin family play a pivotal role by spatially and temporally regulating actin turnover. The activity of ADF and cofilin is tightly regulated via (de)phosphorylation of a regulatory serine residue. Upon dephosphorylation, ADF/cofilin associates preferentially in a cooperative manner with ADP-bound F-actin (1). This binding induces a twist in the actin filament and enhances actin disassembly by filament severing and by dissociation of actin monomers (reviewed in ref. 2). Major reorganizations of the cytoskeleton are also required when mature megakaryocytes (MKs) proceed to generate proplatelets, an event that precedes liberation of platelets in the blood stream (3). In the initial phase of this process, MKs extend their demarcation membranes to form proplatelets. Subsequently, additional changes in cytoskeletal structures cause proplatelets to extend further and allow the relocalization of organelles (4, 5). Actin cytoskeleton and microtubules are involved in proplatelet extension and in the final abscission and cleavage leading to platelet formation in the blood stream of marrow sinusoids (5–7). In vivo, actin filament turnover is a critical step in the terminal phase of platelet formation, as well as in the maturation and sizing of platelets to produce the homogeneous mature platelet population (6, 8).
Interestingly, in many disorders characterized by macrothrombocytopenia the underlying mechanism remains unclear. A noticeable example thereof is von Willebrand disease (VWD)-type 2B, a bleeding disorder caused by mutations in the gene encoding von Willebrand factor (vWF). vWF is a circulating multimeric protein expressed in endothelial cells and MKs that plays a crucial role in the recruitment of platelets to sites of vascular injury via interactions with the platelet receptor glycoprotein Ibα (GPIbα). In VWD-type 2B, gain-of-function mutations in the GPIbα-binding A1 domain of vWF increase the affinity for this platelet receptor, provoking spontaneous interactions between vWF and platelets and loss of high-molecular-weight vWF multimers (9). The underlying causes of thrombocytopenia in VWD-type 2B are multiple, such as the incorporation of platelets bound to plasma vWF into circulating aggregates that display an increased platelet clearance (10, 11). While platelet apoptosis does not seem to be involved (12), defective platelet production appears central to the mechanism of thrombocytopenia in VWD-type 2B. Recently, it became clear that the vWF-GPIbα interaction might play a role in megakaryocytopoiesis with the inventory of macrothrombocytopenic VWD-type 2B patients (13). Indeed, the presence of giant platelets in VWD-type 2B was suggested to result from enhanced binding of endogenous vWF to GPIbα of MKs (14). However, no insight into the molecular mechanisms that could lead to such a dramatic effect on platelet production was provided. The severity of VWD-type 2B is strikingly mutation dependent and one of the most severe mutations is the p.V1316M replacement, which is associated with a constant thrombocytopenia and the presence of giant platelets (15). Interestingly, in a model of platelet formation upregulated by exposure of cultured MKs on a vWF surface to high shear forces, we have previously established a defect in platelet release from normal MKs exposed to immobilized p.V1316M vWF (16). We have recently engineered a knockin murine model for severe VWD-type 2B by introducing the p.V1316M mutation in the A1 domain of the Vwf gene, and we have demonstrated that these mice display a bleeding phenotype that we attributed to both macrothrombocytopenia and thrombopathy (17). Given the crucial role of the cytoskeletal changes to allow megakaryocytopoiesis, we used this mouse model of VWD-type 2B to investigate the hypothesis that a disturbed regulation of actin remodeling contributes to impaired proplatelet formation in VWD-type 2B. Our studies reveal a dysregulation of LIM kinase (LIMK)/cofilin-dependent disassembly of actin filaments in VWD-type 2B. Inhibition of LIMK rescues proplatelet formation in vitro and increases platelet counts to near-normal levels in vivo. Altogether, our results indicate that expression of the type 2B mutant vWF/p.V1316M severely disturbs the signaling pathways in MKs required for platelet formation, thereby contributing to the macrothrombocytopenia associated with this disorder.
Results
The type 2B mutant vWF/p.V1316M induces macrothrombocytopenia in mice.
The presence of giant platelets in type 2B mutant vWF/p.V1316M (hereafter referred to simply as 2B) mice has been previously associated with reduced platelet counts (17). Platelet parameters of 2B mice are depicted in Table 1: the mean platelet volume (MPV) was increased by 44% compared with WT. Blood smear staining (Figure 1A), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Figure 1B and Supplemental Figure 1; supplemental material available online with this article; doi:10.1172/jci.insight.88643DS1) confirmed the presence of giant platelets. The number of α-granules in platelets was similar in both groups (Supplemental Figure 1). In 2B mice, the average platelet count was decreased by 50% compared with WT mice (466 ± 27 × 103 platelets/μl in 2B vs. 930 ± 25 × 103 platelets/μl in WT, P < 0.001; Table 1), but the number of MKs was not different in the bone marrow (BM) of 2B mice compared with WT mice, suggesting that the thrombocytopenia did not result from a reduced number of MKs (Figure 1C). Other blood cell counts were similar between 2B and WT mice (Table 1). We also investigated the expression of vWF in MKs. vWF expression was restricted to α-granules in WT and 2B MKs from BM or those obtained after cell culture in permeabilized conditions (Figure 1D), and was not observed at the surface of nonpermeabilized mature MKs (Supplemental Figure 2). Altogether, these data suggest that the features of the macrothrombocytopenia observed in human VWD-type 2B are reproduced in mice expressing mutant vWF/p.V1316M.
Table 1. Hematologic parametersA.
2B mice exhibit abnormal MK proplatelet extensions and platelet production.
The observation that platelet count is reduced in 2B mice suggests that the presence of mutant vWF inside MKs might reduce their platelet production. An indicator of platelet production in vivo is platelet recovery following antibody-mediated depletion (18). Depletion of circulating platelets by administration of anti–mouse GPIbα antibodies resulted in a similar thrombocytopenia for both WT and 2B mice 48 hours after injection (33 ± 4 × 103 platelets/μl vs. 50 ± 12 × 103 platelets/μl, respectively). A significant delay in platelet count recovery was observed in 2B mice (Figure 2A). For instance, 72 hours after depletion, platelet count was 97 ± 24 × 103 platelets/μl in 2B mice vs. 288 ± 69 × 103 platelets/μl in WT mice (P < 0.01). In WT mice, a transient increase in mean platelet volume (MPV) was measured during the recovery, followed by a return to normal, suggesting the production of newly formed platelets. In contrast, MPV remained unchanged during the recovery in 2B mice, suggesting an intrinsic inability of these mice to produce platelets with normal MPV (Figure 2A). We then evaluated the proplatelet formation in a native microenvironment as previously described (19). In WT BM, distinct morphological features of MKs included those with a spherical shape, others that were deformed, or developed thick extensions (proplatelets) and a decreased cell body size (Supplemental Figure 3). In contrast, in 2B BM, major alterations were observed, since the number of 2B MKs forming proplatelets was drastically decreased compared with WT (1.7% ± 1.1% vs. 28% ± 11% in 2B and WT mice, respectively), while 62% ± 7% of 2B MKs retained a round shape compared with 32% ± 4% in WT mice (Figure 2B). Functional responses of 2B MKs were then analyzed in vitro with cultured BM-derived MKs on fibrinogen-coated surfaces, as previously described (7, 20). The number of 2B MKs undergoing proplatelet formation was significantly reduced compared with WT MKs (17% ± 5% vs. 45% ± 6%, P < 0.05) (Figure 2, C and D). Furthermore, the number of proplatelets per MK was also decreased for 2B MKs (3.6 ± 1.1 vs. 8.8 ± 1.6 for WT MKs, P < 0.05) (Figure 2, C and D). Interestingly, the average diameter of platelet-like structures occurring along the proplatelets was increased in 2B MKs (17 ± 3 μm) versus WT MKs (3 ± 1 μm, P < 0.01) (Figure 2D). Because platelets are released in the circulation following rupture of proplatelets, we analyzed the capacity of MKs to release platelets in a flow chamber model over a vWF matrix as previously described (16, 21). WT MKs were able to form proplatelets and release platelets in the flow (Figure 2E and Supplemental Movie 1). By contrast, 2B MKs formed few proplatelets and the rupture process was impaired, with the proplatelet extension failing to break and remaining attached to the cell body (Figure 2E and Supplemental Movie 2). Our data thus demonstrate that the last steps of platelet production are impaired in 2B MKs, consistent with a reduced rate of platelet production and the presence of giant platelets in vivo.
2B mice display abnormal demarcation membrane system formation but normal MK differentiation.
Because 2B MKs fail to develop proplatelets, we therefore evaluated whether this defect was due to an abnormality of MK morphology and/or MK differentiation during the maturation process. In situ observation of the BM and myelogram analysis showed an increase in 2B MK size (Figure 3, A and B; 513 ± 14 μm2 vs. 435 ± 12 μm2 in 2B and WT, respectively, n = 3 mice with 50–80 MKs/mouse, P < 0.001). To further investigate MK morphology, TEM was used to visualize the demarcation membrane system (DMS), which is known to be the only source of proplatelet membranes (22) in stage III granular/mature MKs. For WT mice, TEM showed a normal MK morphology and platelet territories delimitated by a well-developed membrane system (Figure 3C). For 2B mice, the DMS was less developed within most MKs. The DMS represented 29% ± 2% of the area in 2B MKs, while it represented 44% ± 3% in WT MKs (P < 0.001) (Figure 3, C and D). We next investigated whether this decreased development of the DMS reflected an abnormal differentiation state of the 2B MKs. As a marker of MK differentiation, we examined DNA ploidy, and we also quantified the percentage of MK/erythroid cell fraction, as well as the percentage of MK progenitors (Supplemental Figure 4) in the BM and after in vitro differentiation. No difference was observed in ploidy distribution and in progenitor populations (Supplemental Figure 5). In addition, similar numbers of MK CFU and myeloid CFU were found, indicating a normal commitment to MKs and thus a similar BM functionality of both populations (Supplemental Figure 6). Altogether, these data indicate that the p.V1316M mutation does not modify MK differentiation.
Overall, these data indicate that the macrothrombocytopenia of 2B mice is unlikely to result from defects in MK differentiation, but rather suggests a defect in the formation of the DMS.
Actin disorganization and upregulation of LIMK/cofilin signaling pathway in 2B MKs.
Because 2B MKs failed to develop normal DMS and proplatelet extensions, we investigated the structure of actin, a critical component of the cytoskeleton controlling MK cytoplasmic morphogenesis (8, 23, 24). Actin distribution and organization were investigated in cultured MKs that were allowed to spread on a fibrinogen matrix. In WT MKs, cell spreading was associated with the organization of actin into lamellipodia, stress fibers, and nodules (Figure 4A). By contrast, the organization of F-actin was markedly different in 2B MKs (Figure 4, B and D–G). Although 2B MKs displayed lamellipodia, actin filaments behind the leading edge were unstructured in 66% ± 2% of 2B MKs compared with 7% ± 4% in WT MKs (P < 0.001; Figure 4, A, B, and D–G). These unusually thick peripheral zones enriched in disorganized F-actin displayed an increased ratio of F-actin to globular actin (G-actin), indicating accumulation of actin polymerization (Figure 4C and Supplemental Figure 7). Given the disorganization of the actin network, we considered the hypothesis that the activity of the actin turnover–regulating protein cofilin (8) or levels of the actin-binding scaffold protein IQGAP1 (25) could be modulated in 2B MKs. However, levels of IQGAP1 were similar in 2B and WT MKs (Figure 5A). In contrast, when analyzing levels of the inactive phosphorylated form of cofilin (at Ser3), we observed that it was increased significantly (2.6-fold, P < 0.01) in 2B MKs compared with WT MKs (Figure 5A). We subsequently analyzed levels of phosphorylated LIMK, the kinase that induces cofilin phosphorylation. Interestingly, the level of phosphorylated LIMK was also increased significantly (3.9-fold, P < 0.001) in 2B MKs compared with WT MKs (Figure 5A). Of note, molecules reported to be involved in the GPIbα/vWF-dependent signaling pathway (such as phosphorylated Lyn, p38MAPK, and PLCγ2) were not modified in 2B MKs (Supplemental Figure 8). We then investigated the localization of the total and phosphorylated forms of cofilin in MKs. In WT MKs, the distribution of both forms was homogeneous. However, in 2B MKs, both forms were recruited to the disorganized F-actin structures, indicating accumulation of cofilin in the disturbed actin polymerization zones (Figure 5B).
Together, these data indicate defects in the actin network of 2B MKs pointing to a perturbation of the LIMK/cofilin axis.
LIMK inhibition rescues actin turnover and proplatelet formation in both mouse and human 2B MKs.
To investigate whether hyperactivity of LIMK contributed to disorganization of the actin network in 2B MKs, experiments were performed using a LIMK inhibitor (LIMKi). First, treatment of 2B MKs with LIMKi (10 μM) strongly decreased phosphorylation of cofilin, thereby increasing cofilin activity (Figure 6A). In addition, a decreased accumulation of actin was observed: only 16% ± 11% of 2B MKs presented with actin accumulation after LIMKi treatment compared with 68% ± 2% after vehicle treatment (P < 0.05) (Figure 6B and Supplemental Figure 9). We next evaluated proplatelet formation on a fibrinogen matrix. For WT MKs, the percentage of proplatelet-forming MKs was similar in LIMKi- and vehicle-treated (DMSO) cells (Figure 6C), which is compatible with the normal platelet count reported in LIMK-deficient mice (26). Interestingly, while the percentage of 2B MKs that formed proplatelets remained low in the presence of vehicle (18% ± 1%), treatment of 2B MKs with LIMKi restored proplatelet formation to a level similar to that of vehicle-treated WT MKs (43% ± 2% and 52% ± 10% in LIMKi-treated 2B MKs and vehicle-treated WT MKs, respectively; P > 0.05; Figure 6C). Moreover, the average diameter of platelet-like structures occurring along the proplatelets returned to normal in LIMKi-treated 2B MKs but not in vehicle-treated cells (4.1 ± 0.5 μm vs. 9.5 ± 0.5 μm, respectively [P < 0.01] compared with 4.6 ± 0.7 μm in WT MKs) (Figure 6D). These data indicate that LIMK inhibition rescues active cofilin levels and actin reorganization in 2B MKs, resulting in normal proplatelet formation in vitro.
We next investigated in human VWD-type 2B cultured MKs whether a similar dysregulation of the LIMK/cofilin/actin signaling pathway was also apparent. The patient harboring the p.V1316M mutation presented with a loss of high-molecular-weight vWF multimers and markedly reduced platelet counts (40 × 109 platelets/l) at the time of examination. Human CD34+ cells from peripheral blood of control and the patient were differentiated in vitro in the presence of thrombopoietin (TPO). Following maturation, MKs were allowed to spread on a fibrinogen-coated surface in order to examine actin structure and cofilin phosphorylation. This approach revealed that actin was unstructured in the vast majority of 2B MKs, with actin accumulation in peripheral zones (Figure 7A), similar to that found in murine 2B MKs. Interestingly, regions of actin accumulation were enriched in phosphorylated cofilin, the inactive form (Figure 7A), suggesting that the defect in actin turnover was linked to hyperphosphorylation of cofilin. Indeed, Western blot analysis confirmed an increase in phosphorylated cofilin compared with human control MKs (Figure 7B). We then analyzed proplatelet formation of human 2B and control MKs. At day 11, 2B MKs exhibited a proplatelet formation defect compared with control (9% vs. 23% of proplatelet-forming MKs in patient and control, respectively), with the 2B MKs having shorter proplatelets and larger swellings than the control MKs (Figure 7, C and D). We then sought to rescue proplatelet formation in human 2B MKs using LIMKi. Whereas LIMKi had no effect on proplatelet formation (Figure 7, C and D) and on the average diameter of platelet-like structures in human control MKs (data not shown), LIMK inhibition restored proplatelet formation in 2B MKs (~16% vs. ~9% of proplatelet-forming MKs in LIMKi- and vehicle-treated 2B MKs, respectively; Figure 7, C and D. These percentages are based on analyzing several fields of cells.). Also, we observed that proplatelet organization returned to normal, with thin and long extensions (Figure 7D) and a decreased average diameter of platelet-like structures in LIMKi-treated 2B MKs (1.4 μm) compared with vehicle-treated patient MKs (2.9 μm) (Figure 7E). Our results demonstrate that in both mice and humans, the LIMK/cofilin/actin signaling pathway is dysregulated in the presence of the type 2B p.V1316M mutation and that LIMK inhibition restores (near) normal proplatelet formation in vitro.
RhoA signaling pathway regulates LIMK and cofilin phosphorylation and restricts proplatelet formation in mouse 2B MKs.
Phosphorylation of LIMK and cofilin has been described to be regulated by Rho-family GTPases (reviewed in ref. 27). We then investigated whether a modified Rac1 or RhoA activity in mouse 2B MKs could be responsible for the upregulation of LIMK and cofilin. Interestingly, we found an upregulation of RhoA-GTP in mature 2B MKs compared with WT MKs (Figure 8A), but no difference was observed for Rac-GTP (data not shown). To investigate whether hyperactivity of RhoA contributed to the upregulation of LIMK and cofilin in 2B MKs, experiments were performed using a specific RhoA kinase (ROCK, effector of RhoA) inhibitor, Y-27632. First, treatment of mature WT and 2B MKs with Y-27632 (10 μM) strongly decreased phosphorylation of both LIMK and cofilin, indicating that RhoA controls LIMK and cofilin phosphorylation in WT and 2B MKs (Figure 8B). We next evaluated proplatelet formation on a fibrinogen matrix. For 2B MKs, the percentage of proplatelet-forming MKs and the number of proplatelets per MK were increased in Y-27632–treated cells compared with vehicle-treated (DMSO) cells (Figure 8C). Of note, WT MKs treated with the ROCK inhibitor also showed an increase in the percentage of proplatelet-forming cells (Figure 8C), in agreement with previous observations (28). Taken together, our data demonstrate that the increase in LIMK and cofilin phosphorylation in 2B MKs is due to upregulation of the RhoA signaling pathway restricting proplatelet formation.
In vivo administration of LIMKi increases platelet counts and reduces MPV in 2B mice.
Because our in vitro data demonstrate that LIMK inhibition was able to rescue proplatelet formation in 2B MKs, we then investigated the effect of LIMKi in vivo. LIMKi or vehicle was injected subcutaneously daily for 3 days in WT and 2B mice. Hematologic parameters were measured before administration and then at days 6, 8, and 10. Whereas LIMKi did not affect platelet count (Figure 9A) and MPV (data not shown) in WT mice, it increased the platelet count in 2B mice at days 6 and 8 compared with vehicle (Figure 9B). For instance, platelet count determined at day 6 was 706 ± 44 × 103 platelets/μl in LIMKi-treated 2B mice versus 483 ± 50 × 103 platelets/μl in vehicle-treated 2B mice (P < 0.001), representing an increase of 64% versus 10% in LIMKi- and vehicle-treated 2B mice, respectively. Importantly, LIMKi treatment decreased MPV (at day 6 the MPV was 7.4 ± 0.2 fl in LIMKi-treated 2B mice vs. 8.1 ± 0.1 fl in vehicle-treated 2B mice, P < 0.01) (Figure 9C). Of note, vehicle treatment did not significantly change the platelet counts and MPV at the indicated time points compared with untreated mice. Other blood parameters such as red and white blood cell counts, hemoglobin, and hematocrit were unmodified after the injection of the LIMKi (data not shown), suggesting a specific effect on MKs. These data demonstrate that treatment with LIMKi in 2B mice boosts platelet production and significantly reduces MPV in vivo.
We then evaluated the effects of LIMKi on the function of platelets from 2B mice. In vivo, WT and 2B mice were injected subcutaneously with LIMKi (30 mg/kg) or DMSO as control, daily for 3 days. We then evaluated the platelet function in a tail bleeding time model at day 6, corresponding to the maximum elevation of platelet count observed after LIMKi treatment in 2B mice (Figure 9D). The LIMKi treatment in WT mice did not modify the bleeding time. However, in 2B mice, the hemorrhagic phenotype of these mice was not restored, suggesting that elevation of platelet count was not sufficient to restore a normal hemostasis and that platelet function defects were still present. In vitro, we evaluated the effect of LIMKi on integrin αIIbβ3 activation. We first evaluated the integrin αIIb expression (CD41), and observed an increase of 42% (Figure 9E). This increase correlates with the presence of giant platelets in our model, with a platelet size increase of 44%. Then, platelets of WT and 2B mice were incubated with LIMKi or DMSO for 10 minutes before activation with ADP as agonist. We evaluated the activation level of integrin αIIbβ3 by use of JON/A, a mAb specific for the activated conformation of mouse integrin αIIbβ3. Using flow cytometry, the level of JON/A binding to integrin αIIbβ3 after stimulation with ADP was slightly increased but remained lower in 2B platelets than in activated WT platelets (Figure 9F). After LIMK inhibition, the activation of integrin αIIbβ3 of WT platelets was not modified, and in 2B mice, the LIMKi was not able to restore the level of αIIbβ3 activation to that observed in WT platelets (Figure 9F). Altogether, these data show that LIMKi does not reverse the platelet function defects in vivo (measured by the tail bleeding time) and in vitro (measured by the activation of integrin αIIbβ3).
Discussion
Impaired platelet production is an important clinical problem, as it may result in severe bleeding, and many MK signaling pathways that are affected in disorders characterized by macrothrombocytopenia remain elusive. An example hereof is the bleeding disorder in VWD-type 2B, in which thrombopathy (29) and macrothrombocytopenia are part of complex clinical manifestations observed in patients (13). Long considered a paradoxical bleeding disorder because gain-of-function mutations of plasma vWF should have given rise to a prothrombotic condition, it is now accepted that several causes underlie the thrombocytopenia, such as an increased platelet clearance of vWF/platelet complexes (10). However, the presence of giant platelets also point to vWF-type 2B mutants playing a role in the fine regulation of the processes that result in platelet production. Indeed, previous studies have reported that proplatelet formation is disturbed in VWD-type 2B (14, 30), an observation that we were able to reproduce in 2B mice (Figure 2). The severity of VWD-type 2B is strikingly mutation dependent and one of the most severe mutations is the p.V1316M replacement, which is associated with constant thrombocytopenia and the presence of giant platelets (15). We therefore used our genetically engineered 2B mice to investigate in more detail the different steps that lead to the formation of platelets in order to determine the mechanism of this macrothrombocytopenia. This analysis first revealed that the 2B mice were indistinguishable from WT mice in all steps of differentiation that are required for the generation of mature round-shaped MKs (Supplemental Figure 5). This seems compatible with the notion that vWF expression is initiated at the pre-MK stage (31, 32). Thus, vWF is absent in early stages of megakaryocytopoiesis and mutant vWF/p.V1316M will therefore not influence these parts of the process.
However, mature MKs from the 2B mice did display a number of important differences compared with those in WT mice. First, we observed that 2B MKs were significantly increased in size (approximately 20%) compared with WT MKs (Figure 3). More importantly, DMS, which is the only known source of proplatelet membranes (22) and originates in part from plasma membrane invagination (33), was strongly reduced (Figure 3). Given that all markers of MK maturity (such as CD41, CD42b, and the TPO receptor) were present, this underdeveloped DMS seems to be the consequence of a reduced capacity to generate these membranes. Consecutive stages of DMS organization do rely on F-actin dynamics to polarize membranes (24) and are also controlled by ROCK (34). It seems thus conceivable that the insufficiently developed membrane reservoir is in part responsible for the reduced platelet count and/or the increased platelet size in these 2B mice through dysregulation of F-actin dynamics and RhoA activity, both found to be involved in proplatelet formation defects in 2B MKs.
A second aberrant characteristic that could affect platelet count and/or platelet size in 2B MKs relates to the defect in actin cytoskeleton organization. Indeed, microscopic analysis revealed that actin behind the leading edge is unstructured in the peripheral zone of 2B MKs, with an accumulation of actin filaments. Changes in actin polymerization are key to many processes involving the formation of proplatelets (4–6, 8, 35). In particular, the formation of extensions and proplatelet shaft bifurcations are clearly actin dependent, and it is not surprising that actin plays a fundamental role in the terminal step of proplatelet production (8). Recently, it has been described that proplatelet formation was impaired and MKs displayed a reduced number of proplatelet tips of altered diameter, while actin polymerization was increased in vitro (36).
The signaling cascade that controls actin dynamics involves a variety of proteins, including cofilin. When nonphosphorylated, cofilin stimulates severing and depolymerization of actin and promotes actin turnover. In contrast, when phosphorylated at Ser3, cofilin enters an inactive state and loses its ability to bind actin (reviewed in ref. 2). Consequently, actin filaments are stabilized and accumulate in areas enriched in phosphorylated cofilin (Figures 5 and 7). This extends previous findings showing that hyperphosphorylation of cofilin induces a platelet-formation defect (8, 35). In addition, mutations in the cofilin partner Aip1/Wdr1 lead to macrothrombocytopenia (37). We investigated whether dysregulation of cofilin could explain the defect in the control of the actin network in 2B MKs. Analysis of both human and murine 2B MKs identified the presence of significantly increased levels of phosphorylated cofilin, i.e., the inactive form of cofilin. Our data sustain the following model: in 2B mice, the balance between the nonphosphorylated and phosphorylated cofilin is disturbed and cofilin loses its ability to bind actin, which suppresses actin turnover (Figure 10).
Because LIMK participates in actin dynamics by phosphorylating cofilin (1), additional investigative work was then directed to LIMK. Members of the LIMK family (Lin-11/Isl-1/Mec-3 domain–containing protein kinases) contain 2 N-terminal LIM domains that are protein-binding domains frequently found in cytosolic proteins interacting with the actin cytoskeleton. Indeed, LIMKs have been shown to influence the architecture of the actin cytoskeleton by regulating the activity of the cofilin family proteins (2). We also found increased levels of phosphorylated LIMK in 2B MKs (Figure 5), which were probably responsible for increased levels of inactive cofilin, thereby dysregulating actin turnover. To support this hypothesis, we performed in vitro and in vivo studies using a LIMKi. When added to 2B MKs, the LIMKi resulted in a reduction of the level of the inactive, phosphorylated form of cofilin (Figure 6). Furthermore, the inhibitor normalized not only formation of proplatelet-forming MKs, but also the size of the new proplatelets (Figures 6 and 7). Also, treatment of mice with the LIMKi had tremendous implications, as it resulted in significantly increased platelet counts and reduced MPV values (Figure 9). These in vitro and in vivo data confirm that dysregulation of the LIMK/cofilin pathway in VWD-type 2B is at the origin of impaired proplatelet formation, and thereby contributes to the macrothrombocytopenic phenotype of the patients (Figure 10).
How does the vWF/p.V1316M mutation induce dysregulation of the LIMK/cofilin pathway? Two aspects are of relevance in this regard. First, it has been reported that artificial, ristocetin-stimulated complex formation between vWF and GPIbα induces activation of the LIMK/cofilin pathway (26). We therefore considered the possibility that outside-in signaling induced upon complex formation by freshly secreted vWF/p.V1316M and cell-surface-exposed GPIbα could be responsible for the activation of the LIMK/cofilin pathway. However, in line with previous reports (38), we could not detect any vWF at the MK surface, by immunofluorescence or by flow cytometry. This suggests that the mutation p.V1316M enables vWF to modulate the signaling cascade from its endogenous location, as previously described in human 2B MKs (30). Indeed, addition of 2B vWF in the cell culture boosts platelet production and has an effect opposite that of vWF synthesized by the MK (30).
The second aspect that is of relevance is how vWF/p.V1316M might be able to disturb the LIMK/cofilin pathway. It is known that the activity of LIMK is regulated by the Rho-family GTPases RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42 via their effector kinases ROCK and p21-activated kinase (reviewed in ref. 27). Several of these components have indeed been reported to be involved in the regulation of the actin network and proplatelet formation (28, 35). In 2B MKs, an increase in the active form of RhoA (RhoA-GTP) but not Rac1 was observed. Moreover, the presence of ROCK inhibitor reduces the level of phosphorylated LIMK and of inactive cofilin, both in WT and 2B MKs (Figure 8) and normalized the formation of proplatelet-forming 2B MKs. Our data are in agreement with previous studies providing evidence that the Rho/ROCK pathway acts as a negative regulator of proplatelet formation (28, 39). Indeed, overexpression of a spontaneously active RhoA leads to a decrease in proplatelets, indicating that RhoA activation inhibits proplatelet formation (28). Of note, it was reported that the Rho signaling pathway could be controlled by the small GTPase Rap1 (40). Interestingly, we have recently demonstrated in VWD-type 2B p.V1316M that the thrombopathy originates from an impaired activation of Rap1 (29). It is therefore tempting to speculate that a similar lack of Rap1 activation occurs in 2B MKs, thereby dysregulating the RhoA/ROCK/LIMK/cofilin pathway, which subsequently provokes destabilization of the actin network. This is ultimately manifested by a severely affected proplatelet formation, and explains at least in part the macrothrombocytopenia in VWD-type 2B.
The risk of bleeding in VWD-type 2B patients with thrombocytopenia was shown to be 5 times higher than that of patients with a normal platelet count, notably with the severe p.V1316M mutation (13). Treatment of VWD relies either on replacement therapy with vWF concentrates or on desmopressin (DDAVP) to increase levels of circulating vWF (41). However, DDAVP is not recommended in VWD-type 2B because of the possibility of worsening the thrombocytopenia and further increasing the risk of bleeding (42). Given these major challenges in the prevention or treatment of bleeding in VWD-type 2B patients with thrombocytopenia, a breakthrough might be provided by a treatment favoring platelet production. Whether LIMK could also represent a potential therapeutic target in the treatment of VWD-type 2B was tested in our study. LIMK inhibitors are already under consideration for several indications (43), such as cancer (44), elevated intraocular pressure (45), pulmonary hypertension (46), and human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) (47). Our results (Figure 9) show indeed that targeting LIMK restores platelet counts in 2B mice. However, we also demonstrated that the hemorrhagic phenotype of these mice was not corrected, suggesting that elevation of platelet count was not sufficient to restore a normal hemostasis. Furthermore, we previously demonstrated that platelets from 2B patients (29) and 2B mice (17) are defective in integrin αIIbβ3 activation. After LIMK inhibition, the activation of integrin αIIbβ3 of 2B platelets was not restored. Altogether, these data show that the LIMKi does not reverse the platelet function defects in vivo and in vitro and provide evidence that: (a) the platelet function defect in this model is a more important contributor to the hemostatic defect than the thrombocytopenia, and (b) the LIMK signaling pathway is not involved in the integrin αIIbβ3 activation defect in severe VWD-type 2B. Based on the present study, LIMK inhibitors may be used to restore platelet counts in the treatment of VWD-type 2B patients exhibiting thrombocytopenia, but such treatments need to be combined with hemostatic agents.
The presence of giant platelets associated with a low platelet count is a condition that occurs spontaneously in patients with the most severe VWD-type 2B mutations or in stress conditions for patients with milder mutations. Because macrothrombocytopenic phenotypes are heterogeneous in VWD-type 2B, we can speculate that all ranges of responses could be observed, notably the impaired actin turnover related to the RhoA/LIMK/cofilin pathway. Further investigations are required to determine the involvement of this pathway in a mutation-dependent manner. By comparison, platelet-type VWD (PT-VWD) is an autosomal dominant inherited bleeding disorder caused by gain-of-function mutations of GPIbα conferring to platelet integrin GPIb an enhanced affinity for vWF. This disorder is associated with moderate macrothrombocytopenia, which is currently explained by the formation of vWF-platelet complexes that are then rapidly cleared from the circulation. No studies, however, have shown enhanced platelet clearance in patients with PT-VWD and defective platelet formation. Based on these premises, it is conceivable that defective proplatelet formation may also contribute to macrothrombocytopenia in PT-VWD, but this point requires further investigation. Gain-of-function mutations either in GPIb (PT-VWD) or in vWF (VWD-type 2B) lead to macrothrombocytopenia. It is therefore tempting to speculate that gain-of-function mutations in the receptor or ligand induce a common signaling pathway that dysregulates platelet production.
Methods
Additional description of materials, including a list of antibodies used, and experimental procedures can be found in the online supplemental methods and data.
Mice and hematologic analysis.
The VWD-type 2B knockin mouse model (p.V1316M) has been described elsewhere (17). Mice homozygous for the p.V1316M mutation are referred to as 2B mice and their control littermates as WT mice. Blood counts were determined with an automatic cell counter (Scil Vet ABC Plus, Horiba Medical).
Preparation of MKs and culture.
BM cells were obtained by flushing femurs and tibiae of 2B mice and control littermates, and cells expressing 1 or more of the lineage-specific markers on their surface (Ter119, B220, CD4, CD5, CD11b, and Gr-1) were depleted using immunomagnetic beads (sheep anti-rat IgG Dynabeads, Thermo Fisher Scientific). The remaining population (referred as Lin– cells) was cultured at 37°C in 5% CO2 in Iscove Modified Dulbecco’s Medium (IMDM; Invitrogen) supplemented with 15% BIT 9500 serum substitute (STEMCELL Technologies), α-monothioglycerol (Sigma-Aldrich), and liposomes (phosphatidylcholine, cholesterol, and oleic acid; all from Sigma-Aldrich) (48), and in the presence of 10 nM recombinant human TPO (Miltenyi Biotec). After 5 days of culture, the cell population was enriched in mature MKs using a 1.5%/3% BSA gradient under gravity (1 g) for 45 minutes at room temperature as described (49). For human cells, CD34+ cells were isolated from peripheral blood by an immunomagnetic technique (Miltenyi Biotec). Human recombinant stem cell factor (SCF, 20 ng/ml, Miltenyi Biotec) and human TPO (50 nM) were added once on day 0 to the culture medium, followed by 20 nM TPO alone on day 6 without any addition of SCF thereafter until day 12.
Actin structure and proplatelet formation over fibrinogen matrix.
Coverslips were coated with fibrinogen (100 μg/ml, HYPHEN BioMed SAS) overnight at 4°C. After washing twice with PBS, the coverslips were blocked with BSA (5 mg/ml) for 1 hour at room temperature, and washed twice with PBS before use.
For actin assay, mature MKs were plated on a fibrinogen-coated surface for 3 hours at 37°C and then fixed (4% paraformaldehyde) and permeabilized with Triton X-100 (0.1%), and actin fibers were stained with 4 μg/ml Alexa Fluor 488–labeled phalloidin (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and then visualized by epifluorescence microscopy (Eclipse 600, Nikon) or confocal microscopy (LSM700 confocal microscope, Carl Zeiss). Z-stack images (z-depth, 0.34 μm) were deconvolved using Huygens software (Scientific Volume Imaging). The complete z-stacks were represented as a 3D-volumetric reconstruction using Icy software (Pasteur Institute). To determine the F/G-actin ratio, MKs were stained for 30 minutes at room temperature with Alexa Fluor 488–phalloidin (4 μg/ml) to stain F-actin and with Alexa Fluor 594–labeled DNase I (17 μg/ml, Thermo Fisher Scientific) to stain monomeric G-actin. The F/G-actin integrated intensity was calculated in the peripheral zone of MKs with Fiji software (50).
For proplatelet formation assays, mature MKs were plated on a fibrinogen-coated surface for 5 hours at 37°C. Adherent MKs were fixed (4% paraformaldehyde) and then visualized by TEM (see supplemental methods for details).
Patient 2B.
The patient with a vWF mutation associated with VWD-type 2B was enrolled in this study after informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The patient is a man exhibiting a mutation corresponding to a p.V1316M substitution. The bleeding score of the patient was high (score 27 vs. control < 5) (12) associated with a loss of high-molecular-weight vWF multimers and a low platelet count (40 × 109 platelets/l) at the time of examination.
Study approval.
For mouse studies, housing and experiments were done as recommended by French regulations and the experimental guidelines of the European Community. This project was approved by the local ethics committee CEEA 34 under the number CEEA34.SC.040.12.
For human studies, control and patient gave written informed consent before participating in this study and were enrolled in the study in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM RBM) 01–14.
Statistics.
Quantitative data graphs are presented as dot plots, with the mean ± SEM, or as box and whisker plots, with the lower hinge representing the 25th percentile, and the upper hinge the 75th percentile. The line inside the box marks the median and the mean is represented by a cross (+). The maxima and minima are at the ends of the whiskers.
Statistical analyses were performed using Prism 6 for Mac (GraphPad Software). Statistical differences were analyzed by parametric unpaired 2-tailed Student’s t test or 1-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test as indicated. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Author contributions
AK designed the research studies, conducted experiments, acquired and analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript. SPC, FA, VM, GA, CS, and JCB conducted experiments, acquired and analyzed data. CC, VP, AP, EB, JPR, and ODC analyzed data. MB and CR provided patient blood samples. MB and PJL analyzed data and wrote the manuscript. CVD and DB were responsible for conception and supervision of the study and wrote the manuscript. All authors corrected draft versions and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank the patient who participated in this study and the Animal Platform, CRP2 - UMS 3612 CNRS - US25 Inserm-IRD – Faculté des Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologiques, Université Paris Descartes, and Muriel Andrieu and Karine Labroquère of the Cochin Cytometry and Immunobiology Facility for using the BD LSR II cytometer and BD Canto II. This study was financially supported by grants from INSERM and Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR 11 BSV1-010-01 to C.V. Denis).
Footnotes
Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.
Reference information:JCI Insight. 2016;1(16):e88643. doi:10.1172/jci.insight.88643.
Contributor Information
Alexandre Kauskot, Email: alexandre.kauskot@inserm.fr.
Sonia Poirault-Chassac, Email: sonia.poirault-chassac@inserm.fr.
Frédéric Adam, Email: frederic.adam@inserm.fr.
Vincent Muczynski, Email: vincent.muczynski@inovarion.com.
Gabriel Aymé, Email: gabriel.ayme@inserm.fr.
Caterina Casari, Email: chetti.casari@gmail.com.
Jean-Claude Bordet, Email: jean-claude.bordet@univ-lyon1.fr.
Christelle Soukaseum, Email: christelle.soukaseum-moreau@inserm.fr.
Chantal Rothschild, Email: chantal.rothschild@aphp.fr.
Valérie Proulle, Email: valerie.proulle@aphp.fr.
Audrey Pietrzyk-Nivau, Email: audrey.nivau@platod.fr.
Eliane Berrou, Email: eliane.berrou@inserm.fr.
Olivier D. Christophe, Email: olivier.christophe@inserm.fr.
Jean-Philippe Rosa, Email: jean-philippe.rosa@inserm.fr.
Peter J. Lenting, Email: peter.lenting@inserm.fr.
Marijke Bryckaert, Email: marijke.bryckaert@inserm.fr.
Cécile V. Denis, Email: cecile.denis@inserm.fr.
Dominique Baruch, Email: dominique.baruch@parisdescartes.fr.
References
- 1.Yang N, et al. Cofilin phosphorylation by LIM-kinase 1 and its role in Rac-mediated actin reorganization. Nature. 1998;393(6687):809–812. doi: 10.1038/31735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mizuno K. Signaling mechanisms and functional roles of cofilin phosphorylation and dephosphorylation. Cell Signal. 2013;25(2):457–469. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2012.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Junt T, et al. Dynamic visualization of thrombopoiesis within bone marrow. Science. 2007;317(5845):1767–1770. doi: 10.1126/science.1146304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hartwig J, Italiano J. The birth of the platelet. J Thromb Haemost. 2003;1(7):1580–1586. doi: 10.1046/j.1538-7836.2003.00331.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Italiano JE, Lecine P, Shivdasani RA, Hartwig JH. Blood platelets are assembled principally at the ends of proplatelet processes produced by differentiated megakaryocytes. J Cell Biol. 1999;147(6):1299–1312. doi: 10.1083/jcb.147.6.1299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hartwig JH, Italiano JE. Cytoskeletal mechanisms for platelet production. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2006;36(2):99–103. doi: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2005.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Thon JN, et al. Cytoskeletal mechanics of proplatelet maturation and platelet release. J Cell Biol. 2010;191(4):861–874. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201006102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bender M, et al. ADF/n-cofilin-dependent actin turnover determines platelet formation and sizing. Blood. 2010;116(10):1767–1775. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-03-274340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zimmerman TS, Dent JA, Ruggeri ZM, Nannini LH. Subunit composition of plasma von Willebrand factor. Cleavage is present in normal individuals, increased in IIA and IIB von Willebrand disease, but minimal in variants with aberrant structure of individual oligomers (types IIC, IID, and IIE) J Clin Invest. 1986;77(3):947–951. doi: 10.1172/JCI112394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Casari C, et al. Accelerated uptake of VWF/platelet complexes in macrophages contributes to VWD type 2B-associated thrombocytopenia. Blood. 2013;122(16):2893–2902. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-03-493312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Saba HI, Saba SR, Dent J, Ruggeri ZM, Zimmerman TS. Type IIB Tampa: a variant of von Willebrand disease with chronic thrombocytopenia, circulating platelet aggregates, and spontaneous platelet aggregation. Blood. 1985;66(2):282–286. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Berrou E, et al. Apoptotic platelet events are not observed in severe von Willebrand disease-type 2B mutation p.V1316M. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e88643. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Federici AB, et al. Clinical and molecular predictors of thrombocytopenia and risk of bleeding in patients with von Willebrand disease type 2B: a cohort study of 67 patients. Blood. 2009;113(3):526–534. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-04-152280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nurden P, et al. Impaired megakaryocytopoiesis in type 2B von Willebrand disease with severe thrombocytopenia. Blood. 2006;108(8):2587–2595. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-03-009449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Poon MC, Rand ML, Jackson SC. 2B or not to be--the 45-year saga of the Montreal Platelet Syndrome. Thromb Haemost. 2010;104(5):903–910. doi: 10.1160/TH10-01-0079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dunois-Lardé C, Capron C, Fichelson S, Bauer T, Cramer-Bordé E, Baruch D. Exposure of human megakaryocytes to high shear rates accelerates platelet production. Blood. 2009;114(9):1875–1883. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-03-209205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Adam F, et al. A genetically-engineered von Willebrand disease type 2B mouse model displays defects in hemostasis and inflammation. Sci Rep. 2016;6:e88643. doi: 10.1038/srep26306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chandraratne S, et al. Critical role of platelet glycoprotein ibα in arterial remodeling. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2015;35(3):589–597. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.114.304447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Strassel C, et al. Intrinsic impaired proplatelet formation and microtubule coil assembly of megakaryocytes in a mouse model of Bernard-Soulier syndrome. Haematologica. 2009;94(6):800–810. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2008.001032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Larson MK, Watson SP. Regulation of proplatelet formation and platelet release by integrin alpha IIb beta3. Blood. 2006;108(5):1509–1514. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-11-011957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pietrzyk-Nivau A, et al. Three-dimensional environment sustains hematopoietic stem cell differentiation into platelet-producing megakaryocytes. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e88643. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Schulze H, et al. Characterization of the megakaryocyte demarcation membrane system and its role in thrombopoiesis. Blood. 2006;107(10):3868–3875. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-07-2755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sui Z, Nowak RB, Sanada C, Halene S, Krause DS, Fowler VM. Regulation of actin polymerization by tropomodulin-3 controls megakaryocyte actin organization and platelet biogenesis. Blood. 2015;126(4):520–530. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-09-601484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Antkowiak A, et al. Cdc42-dependent F-actin dynamics drive structuration of the demarcation membrane system in megakaryocytes. J Thromb Haemost. 2016;14(6):1268–1284. doi: 10.1111/jth.13318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Malarkannan S, et al. IQGAP1: a regulator of intracellular spacetime relativity. J Immunol. 2012;188(5):2057–2063. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1102439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Estevez B, et al. LIM kinase-1 selectively promotes glycoprotein Ib-IX-mediated TXA2 synthesis, platelet activation, and thrombosis. Blood. 2013;121(22):4586–4594. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-12-470765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bernard O. Lim kinases, regulators of actin dynamics. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2007;39(6):1071–1076. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2006.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Chang Y, et al. Proplatelet formation is regulated by the Rho/ROCK pathway. Blood. 2007;109(10):4229–4236. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-04-020024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Casari C, et al. von Willebrand factor mutation promotes thrombocytopathy by inhibiting integrin αIIbβ3. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(12):5071–5081. doi: 10.1172/JCI69458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nurden P, et al. Abnormal VWF modifies megakaryocytopoiesis: studies of platelets and megakaryocyte cultures from patients with von Willebrand disease type 2B. Blood. 2010;115(13):2649–2656. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-07-231886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cramer EM, et al. Uncoordinated expression of fibrinogen compared with thrombospondin and von Willebrand factor in maturing human megakaryocytes. Blood. 1989;73(5):1123–1129. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Pronk CJ, et al. Elucidation of the phenotypic, functional, and molecular topography of a myeloerythroid progenitor cell hierarchy. Cell Stem Cell. 2007;1(4):428–442. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2007.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Eckly A, et al. Biogenesis of the demarcation membrane system (DMS) in megakaryocytes. Blood. 2014;123(6):921–930. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-03-492330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Avanzi MP, Goldberg F, Davila J, Langhi D, Chiattone C, Mitchell WB. Rho kinase inhibition drives megakaryocyte polyploidization and proplatelet formation through MYC and NFE2 downregulation. Br J Haematol. 2014;164(6):867–876. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Pleines I, et al. Defective tubulin organization and proplatelet formation in murine megakaryocytes lacking Rac1 and Cdc42. Blood. 2013;122(18):3178–3187. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-03-487942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bury L, Falcinelli E, Chiasserini D, Springer TA, Italiano JE, Gresele P. Cytoskeletal perturbation leads to platelet dysfunction and thrombocytopenia in variant forms of Glanzmann thrombasthenia. Haematologica. 2016;101(1):46–56. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2015.130849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kile BT, et al. Mutations in the cofilin partner Aip1/Wdr1 cause autoinflammatory disease and macrothrombocytopenia. Blood. 2007;110(7):2371–2380. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-10-055087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Balduini A, et al. Adhesive receptors, extracellular proteins and myosin IIA orchestrate proplatelet formation by human megakaryocytes. J Thromb Haemost. 2008;6(11):1900–1907. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.03132.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Suzuki A, et al. RhoA is essential for maintaining normal megakaryocyte ploidy and platelet generation. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e88643. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Post A, Pannekoek WJ, Ponsioen B, Vliem MJ, Bos JL. Rap1 Spatially controls ArhGAP29 to inhibit Rho signaling during endothelial barrier regulation. Mol Cell Biol. 2015;35(14):2495–2502. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01453-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mariana G, et al. Evaluation of the effectiveness of DDAVP in surgery and in bleeding episodes in haemophilia and von Willebrand’s disease. A study on 43 patients. Clin Lab Haematol. 1984;6(3):229–238. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2257.1984.tb00548.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Federici AB, Castaman G, Mannucci PM, Italian Association of Hemophilia Centers (AICE) Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of von Willebrand disease in Italy. Haemophilia. 2002;8(5):607–621. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2516.2002.00672.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Boland S, et al. Design, synthesis and biological characterization of selective LIMK inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2015;25(18):4005–4010. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2015.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Prudent R, et al. Pharmacological inhibition of LIM kinase stabilizes microtubules and inhibits neoplastic growth. Cancer Res. 2012;72(17):4429–4439. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Harrison BA, et al. Novel class of LIM-kinase 2 inhibitors for the treatment of ocular hypertension and associated glaucoma. J Med Chem. 2009;52(21):6515–6518. doi: 10.1021/jm901226j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Dai YP, Bongalon S, Tian H, Parks SD, Mutafova-Yambolieva VN, Yamboliev IA. Upregulation of profilin, cofilin-2 and LIMK2 in cultured pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells and in pulmonary arteries of monocrotaline-treated rats. Vascul Pharmacol. 2006;44(5):275–282. doi: 10.1016/j.vph.2005.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Vorster PJ, et al. LIM kinase 1 modulates cortical actin and CXCR4 cycling and is activated by HIV-1 to initiate viral infection. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(14):12554–12564. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.182238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Poirault-Chassac S, et al. Notch/Delta4 signaling inhibits human megakaryocytic terminal differentiation. Blood. 2010;116(25):5670–5678. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-05-285957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Schulze H. Culture of murine megakaryocytes and platelets from fetal liver and bone marrow. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;788:193–203. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-307-3_14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Schindelin J, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.