Skip to main content
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN logoLink to Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN
. 2016 Jul 21;11(10):1834–1844. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01520216

Dietary Protein and Potassium, Diet–Dependent Net Acid Load, and Risk of Incident Kidney Stones

Pietro Manuel Ferraro *,, Ernest I Mandel , Gary C Curhan †,, Giovanni Gambaro *, Eric N Taylor ‡,§
PMCID: PMC5053786  PMID: 27445166

Abstract

Background and objectives

Protein and potassium intake and the resulting diet–dependent net acid load may affect kidney stone formation. It is not known whether protein type or net acid load is associated with risk of kidney stones.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements

We prospectively examined intakes of protein (dairy, nondairy animal, and vegetable), potassium, and animal protein-to-potassium ratio (an estimate of net acid load) and risk of incident kidney stones in the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study (n=42,919), the Nurses’ Health Study I (n=60,128), and the Nurses’ Health Study II (n=90,629). Multivariable models were adjusted for age, body mass index, diet, and other factors. We also analyzed cross-sectional associations with 24-hour urine (n=6129).

Results

During 3,108,264 person-years of follow-up, there were 6308 incident kidney stones. Dairy protein was associated with lower risk in the Nurses’ Health Study II (hazard ratio for highest versus lowest quintile, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.73 to 0.96; P value for trend <0.01). The hazard ratios for nondairy animal protein were 1.15 (95% confidence interval, 0.97 to 1.36; P value for trend =0.04) in the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study and 1.20 (95% confidence interval, 0.99 to 1.46; P value for trend =0.06) in the Nurses’ Health Study I. Potassium intake was associated with lower risk in all three cohorts (hazard ratios from 0.44 [95% confidence interval, 0.36 to 0.53] to 0.67 [95% confidence interval, 0.57 to 0.78]; P values for trend <0.001). Animal protein-to-potassium ratio was associated with higher risk (P value for trend =0.004), even after adjustment for animal protein and potassium. Higher dietary potassium was associated with higher urine citrate, pH, and volume (P values for trend <0.002).

Conclusions

Kidney stone risk may vary by protein type. Diets high in potassium or with a relative abundance of potassium compared with animal protein could represent a means of stone prevention.

Keywords: acid load; nutrition; potassium; protein; urolithiasis; NEAP; kidney stones; Body Mass Index; Citrates; Citric Acid; Cross-Sectional Studies; Diet; Dietary Proteins; Epidemiologic Studies; Follow-Up Studies; Kidney Calculi; Potassium, Dietary; Risk; Vegetables

Introduction

Although protein intake is thought to be an important risk factor for kidney stone formation, evidence is limited. Higher animal protein intake may result in increased urinary excretion of calcium and uric acid and reduced citrate and urine pH, thus potentially favoring formation of calcium oxalate and uric acid stones (1,2). However, relatively few studies have examined associations between animal protein intake and risk of actual kidney stones. In one randomized trial, the risk of recurrence in calcium oxalate stone formers with lower animal protein intake was not significantly different from the control group with higher animal protein intake (3), but the study was limited by the high dropout rate (46%). Observational studies also have reported conflicting results; in particular, previous analyses of the association between animal protein and risk of stones in the Nurses’ Health Study I (NHS I) and the Nurses’ Health Study II (NHS II) cohorts showed no association (4,5), and a positive association in the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study (HPFS) was only in men with a body mass index (BMI) <25 kg/m2 (6). To date, no data are available on the risk of stones associated with intakes of different types of animal protein (i.e., dairy versus nondairy) or vegetable protein.

Data on the association between intake of potassium, a marker of dietary intake of organic anion, and risk of stones also are inconclusive. Higher dietary potassium intake would decrease urinary excretion of calcium, thus potentially protecting against stone formation (7). To date, no trial has examined the effect of a diet rich in fruits and vegetables (a major dietary source of potassium) on the risk of stones; however, potassium citrate has been shown to be effective in reducing recurrence in stone formers (8). Higher potassium intake has been associated with lower risk of kidney stones in the NHS I and the HPFS but not in the NHS II (46).

The balance between protein and potassium intake from diet also might be important with regard to risk of forming kidney stones. These two factors are major determinants of net endogenous acid production (NEAP), with acid production from sulfur–containing amino acids from protein counterbalanced by bicarbonate generation from alkali–containing potassium salts (9). Higher estimated NEAP values have been associated with higher urinary calcium and lower citrate excretion (10,11), and cross-sectional studies have described higher dietary acid load among stone formers (12); however, the association between dietary net acid load and incident kidney stones has not been analyzed in longitudinal prospective studies.

We analyzed prospective associations between intake of different types of protein (vegetable, dairy, and nondairy animal), intake of potassium, and the interaction between animal protein and potassium intake and risk of incident kidney stones in three large cohort studies.

Materials and Methods

Study Populations

The HPFS was established in 1986 with the enrollment of 51,529 men who were health professionals (dentists, optometrists, osteopaths, pharmacists, podiatrists, and veterinarians) between the ages of 40 and 75 years old. The NHS I was established in 1976 with the enrollment of 121,700 women who were registered nurses between the ages of 30 and 55 years old, and the NHS II was established in 1989 with the enrollment of 116,430 women who were registered nurses between the ages of 25 and 42 years old. At enrollment, participants from each cohort completed a questionnaire with detailed information on diet, medical history, and medications. Participants subsequently were followed with biennial questionnaires including updated information and newly diagnosed diseases.

For this analysis, follow-up was started in 1986 for the HPFS and the NHS I and 1991 for the NHS II (the dates of the first detailed food frequency questionnaire [FFQ]) and went until the latest available information on confirmed incident stones: January of 2012 for the HPFS, May of 2006 for the NHS I, and May of 2011 for the NHS II. We only included participants without a history of kidney stones at baseline; furthermore, participants with a history of malignancy (except for nonmelanoma skin cancer) at baseline were excluded, and those who developed malignancies during follow-up were censored. For the NHS I, only participants who answered questionnaires in 1992 (the year of the first lifetime kidney stone history inquiry) or later were included.

Assessment of Diet

In 1986 (the HPFS and the NHS I) and 1991 (the NHS II), participants completed an FFQ asking about the average annual intake of >130 foods and 22 beverages; subsequently, the information was updated through FFQs every 4 years. Frequencies of consumption of each unit of food were used to compute intakes of nutrients using data from the US Department of Agriculture, except for oxalate content, which was measured by capillary electrophoresis in the majority of foods from the FFQ (13,14). All nutrients were energy adjusted to account for total amount of food eaten. FFQs were previously found to be reproducible and valid in the HPFS and the NHS I (15,16).

Dietary–dependent net acid load was estimated as the animal protein-to-potassium ratio (APKR), which previously was shown to be highly correlated with renal net acid excretion (r=0.90) (9). We also estimated NEAP from total protein and potassium intake using the equation in the work by Frassetto et al. (9), which is also highly correlated with renal net acid excretion (r=0.84).

Assessment of Kidney Stones

Participants who reported the occurrence of a kidney stone on the biennial questionnaire were asked to complete a supplementary questionnaire to establish the date of occurrence and accompanying symptoms. For this analysis, only kidney stones accompanied by pain and/or hematuria were considered; those participants reporting a new stone event without accompanying pain or hematuria were censored. Evaluation of medical records among 582 participants from the HPFS, 194 participants from the NHS I, and 858 participants from the NHS II who reported a kidney stone confirmed the diagnosis in 95%, 96%, and 98% of patients, respectively.

Assessment of Other Covariates

Information on age, BMI, history of diabetes, history of hypertension, use of thiazides, and amount of calcium supplements was obtained from the biennial questionnaire. Self-reported weight, used to calculate BMI, was validated in the HPFS and the NHS I cohorts (17).

Assessment of Urinary Composition

Twenty-four–hour urine samples were collected in three cycles. In the first cycle, participants were eligible if they were ≤70 years of age in the HPFS or ≤65 years of age in the NHS I and had no history of cancer or cardiovascular disease. In the second cycle, participants were eligible if they were ≤75 years of age and had no history of cancer (other than nonmelanoma skin cancer). The third cycle was performed only by the participants in the NHS II, with the following criteria: age ≤55 years old, white race, and no history of high BP, coronary heart disease, or cancer. Urine samples collected in the first two cycles were analyzed with the system provided by Mission Pharmacal (San Antonio, TX), whereas the samples collected in the third cycle were analyzed by the Litholink Corporation (Chicago, IL). Participants with a history of kidney stones were oversampled in the first two cycles.

Participants with possible over- or undercollections (defined as urinary creatinine excretion in the top or bottom 1% of the nonstone-formers distribution) were removed from the analysis. For participants who provided more than one collection, the first sample was analyzed.

Statistical Analyses

The analysis of kidney stone risk was prospective; dietary intakes were assessed before the incident kidney stone. For each cohort, participants were divided into quintiles of intakes, and time at risk was calculated as time from start of follow-up to an incident kidney stone, loss to follow-up, death, or censoring (whichever happened first). Cox proportional hazards regression models generated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) adjusted for age (continuous), BMI (13 categories), history of diabetes (yes versus no), history of hypertension (yes versus no), use of thiazides (yes versus no), supplemental calcium intake (four categories), and dietary intakes of fluid, calcium, sodium, fructose, oxalate, phytate (all quintiles), and alcohol (four categories). Vegetable, nondairy animal, and dairy protein models were simultaneously adjusted for the other types of protein and potassium intake (all quintiles) but not for dietary calcium (because of high correlation between dietary calcium and dairy protein); APKR and NEAP models were further adjusted for their components: animal protein intake (APKR), all types of protein (NEAP), and potassium intake (APKR and NEAP). With the components included in the models, estimates for APKR and NEAP are interpreted as interaction terms. Information on exposures and covariates was updated every 4 years. Tests for linear trends were constructed by analyzing the median value for each quintile as a continuous variable. Effect modification by age (≤50 versus >50 years old), BMI (≤25 versus >25 kg/m2), and use of thiazides was investigated through interaction terms for each type of protein, dietary potassium intake, and APKR.

Differences in urinary components across quintiles of exposure were analyzed with linear regression models using each urinary component as the dependent variable; adjusted for age, BMI, history of kidney stones, history of diabetes, history of hypertension, use of thiazides, supplemental calcium, study cohort, intake of fluid, urine creatinine, and sodium, and expressed as adjusted means, differences, and 95% CIs. When dietary potassium was used as the exposure, models were further adjusted for all types of protein; when protein intake and APKR were used as the exposure, models were also further adjusted for dietary potassium. For these analyses, we used information from the most recent questionnaire before the urine collection.

For each analysis, we evaluated between-cohort heterogeneity; pooled estimates obtained by random effects meta–analysis are presented whenever the P value for heterogeneity was >0.05.

Results

In total, 193,676 participants were included in the analysis of incident kidney stones (42,919 from the HPFS, 60,128 from the NHS I, and 90,629 from the NHS II). Baseline characteristics of the study participants are shown in Table 1 and Supplemental Table 1.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of the study cohorts

Variable HPFS, n=42,919 NHS I, n=60,128 NHS II, n=90,629
Age, yr 54.3 (9.8) 52.9 (7.1) 36.6 (4.6)
BMI, kg/m2 25.5 (3.4) 25.2 (4.7) 24.6 (5.3)
History of diabetes, % 3 3 1
History of hypertension, % 21 24 6
Thiazide use, % 9 14 2
Calcium supplements use, % 23 57 34
Dietary calcium, mg/d 802 (306) 720 (253) 886 (305)
Supplemental calcium, mg/d 98 (262) 357 (429) 129 (273)
Magnesium, mg/d 355 (83) 300 (69) 316 (75)
Fructose, g/d 25.3 (11.4) 21.6 (9.0) 22.9 (11.0)
Oxalate, mg/d 144 (136) 119 (92) 135 (115)
Phytate, mg/d 943 (392) 708 (269) 783 (240)
Alcohol intake, g/d 11.5 (15.6) 6.2 (10.7) 3.1 (6.1)
Fluid intake, L/d 1.9 (0.8) 2.0 (0.7) 2.1 (0.8)
Dairy protein, g/d 15.9 (9.2) 15.0 (7.8) 18.6 (9.1)
Nondairy animal protein, g/d 51.5 (18.2) 47.1 (14.5) 49.1 (16.2)
Vegetable protein, g/d 24.8 (6.2) 20.2 (4.2) 22.5 (5.0)
Dietary potassium, mg/d 3389 (659) 3002 (562) 2933 (540)

Data are reported as means (SD) for continuous variables. HPFS, Health Professionals Follow-Up Study; NHS I, Nurses’ Health Study I; NHS II, Nurses’ Health Study II; BMI, body mass index.

Association between Type of Protein and Risk of Stones

Over 3,108,264 person-years of follow-up, 6308 incident kidney stones were confirmed. The association between the type of protein and risk of kidney stones is presented in Tables 2 and 3 and Supplemental Table 2.

Table 2.

Quintiles of dairy protein intake and risk of kidney stones

Cohort Quintile 1 Quintile 2 Quintile 3 Quintile 4 Quintile 5 P Value for Trend
HPFS
 Median, g/d 6.1 10.2 13.8 18.5 28.0 <0.001
 Range <8.4 8.4–12.0 12.1–15.9 16.0–22.2 >22.2 0.59
 Patients 426 427 361 419 330
 Person-time 129,932 132,983 134,714 135,399 136,458
 Age-adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 (reference) 0.97 (0.85 to 1.11) 0.81 (0.71 to 0.94) 0.94 (0.82 to 1.08) 0.76 (0.66 to 0.88)
 Multivariate-adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 (reference) 0.97 (0.84 to 1.11) 0.83 (0.71 to 0.96) 1.00 (0.87 to 1.16) 0.93 (0.78 to 1.10)
NHS I
 Median, g/d 6.5 10.3 13.6 17.8 25.4 0.003
 Range <8.5 8.5–11.9 12.0–15.5 15.6–20.9 >20.9 0.89
 Patients 282 281 275 275 218
 Person-time 195,814 202,303 203,431 205,077 203,817
 Age-adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 (reference) 0.96 (0.81 to 1.13) 0.93 (0.79 to 1.10) 0.93 (0.78 to 1.09) 0.76 (0.63 to 0.90)
 Multivariate-adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 (reference) 0.99 (0.84 to 1.17) 1.01 (0.85 to 1.20) 1.06 (0.89 to 1.27) 0.95 (0.76 to 1.17)
NHS II
 Median, g/d 8.4 13.0 17.0 22.2 30.7 <0.001
 Range <10.9 10.9–15.0 15.1–19.3 19.4–25.7 >25.7 <0.01
 Patients 684 655 597 569 509
 Person-time 279,594 284,238 286,507 288,062 289,934
 Age-adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 (reference) 0.93 (0.83 to 1.03) 0.84 (0.75 to 0.93) 0.79 (0.70 to 0.88) 0.70 (0.62 to 0.78)
 Multivariate-adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 (reference) 0.97 (0.87 to 1.08) 0.90 (0.80 to 1.01) 0.88 (0.78 to 0.99) 0.84 (0.73 to 0.96)
Pooled cohorts
 Age-adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 (reference) 0.95 (0.88 to 1.02) 0.85 (0.78 to 0.92) 0.87 (0.77 to 0.99) 0.73 (0.67 to 0.79) <0.001
 Multivariate-adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 (reference) 0.97 (0.90 to 1.05) 0.90 (0.82 to 1.00) 0.97 (0.86 to 1.08) 0.89 (0.81 to 0.98) 0.06

Multivariate models were adjusted for age, body mass index, history of diabetes, history of hypertension, use of thiazides, supplemental calcium, and intakes of fluid, sodium, potassium, fructose, oxalate, phytate, alcohol, and all other sources of protein. Medians refer to the first time period; however, dietary variables were updated over the course of the study. HPFS, Health Professionals Follow-Up Study; HR, hazard ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; NHS I, Nurses’ Health Study I; NHS II, Nurses’ Health Study II.

Table 3.

Quintiles of nondairy animal protein intake and risk of kidney stones

Cohort Quintile 1 Quintile 2 Quintile 3 Quintile 4 Quintile 5 P Value for Trend
HPFS
 Median, g/d 31.4 42.6 50.3 58.6 72.5 0.004
 Range <38.9 38.9–47.2 47.3–55.4 55.5–66.2 >66.2 0.04
 Patients 351 364 379 424 445
 Person-time 133,204 133,448 134,142 134,288 134,406
 Age-adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 (reference) 1.04 (0.90 to 1.20) 1.05 (0.91 to 1.22) 1.17 (1.01 to 1.35) 1.19 (1.04 to 1.37)
 Multivariate-adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 (reference) 0.98 (0.84 to 1.14) 0.99 (0.85 to 1.15) 1.09 (0.93 to 1.28) 1.15 (0.97 to 1.36)
NHS I
 Median, g/d 30.9 39.6 45.9 52.8 64.4 0.001
 Range <36.2 36.2–42.9 43.0–49.5 49.6–58.1 >58.1 0.06
 Patients 229 253 259 268 322
 Person-time 202,112 203,103 203,627 202,284 199,316
 Age-adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 (reference) 1.10 (0.92 to 1.31) 1.09 (0.91 to 1.30) 1.12 (0.94 to 1.34) 1.34 (1.13 to 1.59)
 Multivariate-adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 (reference) 1.04 (0.87 to 1.25) 1.02 (0.84 to 1.22) 1.03 (0.85 to 1.25) 1.20 (0.99 to 1.46)
NHS II
 Median, g/d 30.9 41.3 48.3 55.8 68.5 0.01
 Range <37.3 37.3–45.1 45.2–52.7 52.8–62.7 >62.7 0.64
 Patients 560 645 566 576 667
 Person-time 286,109 286,994 286,767 285,358 282,807
 Age-adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 (reference) 1.14 (1.02 to 1.28) 1.01 (0.90 to 1.13) 1.03 (0.92 to 1.16) 1.21 (1.09 to 1.36)
 Multivariate-adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 (reference) 1.07 (0.95 to 1.20) 0.91 (0.80 to 1.03) 0.91 (0.80 to 1.03) 1.02 (0.90 to 1.17)
Pooled cohorts
 Age-adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 (reference) 1.10 (1.02 to 1.19) 1.04 (0.96 to 1.12) 1.09 (1.00 to 1.18) 1.23 (1.14 to 1.33) <0.001
 Multivariate-adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 (reference) 1.04 (0.95 to 1.12) 0.95 (0.88 to 1.04) 1.00 (0.89 to 1.12) 1.10 (1.00 to 1.21) 0.20

Multivariate models were adjusted for age, body mass index, history of diabetes, history of hypertension, use of thiazides, supplemental calcium, and intakes of fluid, sodium, potassium, fructose, oxalate, phytate, alcohol, and all other types of protein. Medians refer to the first time period; however, dietary variables were updated over the course of the study. HPFS, Health Professionals Follow-Up Study; HR, hazard ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; NHS I, Nurses’ Health Study I; NHS II, Nurses’ Health Study II.

There was a significant inverse association between dairy protein intake and risk of stones in the NHS II (the multivariate-adjusted HR for the highest quintile compared with the lowest was 0.84; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.96; P value for trend <0.01) but not in the HPFS (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.10; P value for trend =0.59) or the NHS I (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.17; P value for trend =0.89). The pooled analysis showed that the HR was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.81 to 0.98; P value for trend =0.06).

The HRs for nondairy animal protein intake were 1.15 in the HPFS (95% CI, 0.97 to 1.36; P value for trend =0.04), 1.20 in the NHS I (95% CI, 0.99 to 1.46; P value for trend =0.06), and 1.02 in the NHS II (95% CI, 0.90 to 1.17; P value for trend =0.64). The pooled analysis showed an HR of 1.10 (95% CI, 1.00 to 1.21; P value for trend =0.20). Because the higher risk was manifest predominantly in the highest quintile of nondairy animal protein, we also analyzed participants with intakes higher than those in the top quintile median. In this subanalysis, the HRs were 1.20 (95% CI, 0.99 to 1.46; P value for trend =0.03) for the HPFS, 1.28 (95% CI, 1.02 to 1.61; P value for trend =0.02) for the NHS I, and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.83 to 1.14; P value for trend =0.66) for the NHS II.

There was no significant association between intake of vegetable protein and risk of stones. There was no significant effect modification by age, BMI, or use of thiazides for any source of protein.

Association between Intake of Potassium and Risk of Stones

The association between dietary potassium intake and risk of kidney stones is presented in Table 4. After multivariable adjustment, there was a strong inverse association between potassium intake and risk of stones: the HR was 0.44 (95% CI, 0.36 to 0.53) for the HPFS, 0.57 (95% CI, 0.45 to 0.72) for the NHS I, and 0.67 (95% CI, 0.57 to 0.78) for the NHS II (all P values for trend <0.001). There was no significant effect modification by age, BMI, or use of thiazides.

Table 4.

Quintiles of dietary potassium intake and risk of kidney stones

Cohort Quintile 1 Quintile 2 Quintile 3 Quintile 4 Quintile 5 P Value for Trend
HPFS
 Median, g/d 2601 3016 3327 3667 4224 <0.001
 Range <2835 2835–3175 3176–3488 3489–3888 >3888 <0.001
 Patients 567 459 368 332 237
 Person-time 128,870 134,246 135,483 135,420 135,469
 Age-adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 (reference) 0.78 (0.69 to 0.88) 0.64 (0.56 to 0.73) 0.60 (0.52 to 0.68) 0.44 (0.38 to 0.51)
 Multivariate-adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 (reference) 0.78 (0.68 to 0.89) 0.64 (0.55 to 0.74) 0.60 (0.51 to 0.70) 0.44 (0.36 to 0.53)
NHS I
 Median, g/d 2323 2694 2971 3261 3722 <0.001
 Range <2535 2535–2835 2836–3108 3109–3448 >3448 <0.001
 Patients 393 287 245 211 195
 Person-time 196,777 203,677 204,510 204,711 200,767
 Age-adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 (reference) 0.71 (0.61 to 0.82) 0.61 (0.52 to 0.72) 0.53 (0.45 to 0.63) 0.50 (0.42 to 0.60)
 Multivariate-adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 (reference) 0.74 (0.63 to 0.87) 0.66 (0.55 to 0.79) 0.58 (0.48 to 0.72) 0.57 (0.45 to 0.72)
NHS II
 Median, g/d 2275 2649 2910 3180 3612 <0.001
 Range <2491 2491–2784 2785–3038 3039–3354 >3354 <0.001
 Patients 815 662 595 533 409
 Person-time 282,413 285,735 287,785 286,885 285,518
 Age-adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 (reference) 0.81 (0.73 to 0.90) 0.72 (0.65 to 0.80) 0.65 (0.58 to 0.73) 0.50 (0.45 to 0.57)
 Multivariate-adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 (reference) 0.91 (0.82 to 1.02) 0.87 (0.77 to 0.98) 0.83 (0.73 to 0.94) 0.67 (0.57 to 0.78)

Multivariate models were adjusted for age, body mass index, history of diabetes, history of hypertension, use of thiazides, supplemental calcium, and intakes of fluid, calcium, sodium, fructose, oxalate, phytate, alcohol, and all other types of protein. Medians refer to the first time period; however, dietary variables were updated over the course of the study. Cohort-specific results were not pooled because of statistically significant test for heterogeneity. HPFS, Health Professionals Follow-Up Study; HR, hazard ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; NHS I, Nurses’ Health Study I; NHS II, Nurses’ Health Study II.

Association between Dietary Net Acid Load and Risk of Stones

The association between estimated dietary net acid load and risk of kidney stones is presented in Table 5 and Supplemental Table 3. After multivariable adjustment including animal protein and potassium intake, there was a significant positive association between APKR and risk of stones: the pooled HR was 1.41 (95% CI, 1.18 to 1.68; P value for trend =0.004). A similar association was seen with NEAP (pooled HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.41; P value for trend <0.01). There was no significant effect modification by age, BMI, or use of thiazides.

Table 5.

Quintiles of animal protein-to-potassium ratio and risk of kidney stones

Cohort Quintile 1 Quintile 2 Quintile 3 Quintile 4 Quintile 5 P Value for Trend
HPFS
 Median, g/mEq 0.46 0.59 0.70 0.81 1.01 <0.001
 Range <0.53 0.53–0.64 0.65–0.75 0.76–0.88 >0.88 <0.001
 Patients 268 336 378 408 573 0.004
 Person-time 131,584 132,719 134,206 135,099 135,879
 Age-adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 (reference) 1.21 (1.03 to 1.42) 1.30 (1.10 to 1.52) 1.35 (1.16 to 1.59) 1.84 (1.58 to 2.14)
 Model 1 multivariate–adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 (reference) 1.25 (1.06 to 1.48) 1.33 (1.13 to 1.57) 1.36 (1.14 to 1.60) 1.72 (1.45 to 2.04)
 Model 2 multivariate–adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 (reference) 1.19 (0.99 to 1.44) 1.26 (1.01 to 1.53) 1.28 (0.98 to 1.66) 1.63 (1.18 to 2.25)
NHS I
 Median, g/mEq 0.46 0.57 0.67 0.77 0.94 <0.001
 Range <0.50 0.50–0.60 0.61–0.70 0.71–0.82 >0.82 0.004
 Patients 205 213 253 301 359 <0.01
 Person-time 201,541 201,865 202,107 202,490 202,439
 Age-adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 (reference) 1.01 (0.84 to 1.23) 1.21 (1.01 to 1.47) 1.44 (1.20 to 1.74) 1.72 (1.43 to 2.06)
 Model 1 multivariate–adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 (reference) 0.98 (0.80 to 1.19) 1.10 (0.90 to 1.35) 1.23 (1.00 to 1.50) 1.29 (1.04 to 1.61)
 Model 2 multivariate–adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 (reference) 1.06 (0.85 to 1.32) 1.26 (0.97 to 1.62) 1.45 (1.08 to 1.95) 1.59 (1.10 to 2.31)
NHS II
 Median, g/mEq 0.49 0.64 0.74 0.86 1.07 <0.001
 Range <0.57 0.57–0.69 0.70–0.79 0.80–0.94 >0.94 0.16
 Patients 507 549 616 639 703 0.16
 Person-time 283,922 284,365 285,185 286,649 288,214
 Age-adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 (reference) 1.10 (0.97 to 1.24) 1.25 (1.11 to 1.41) 1.34 (1.19 to 1.51) 1.53 (1.35 to 1.72)
 Model 1 multivariate–adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 (reference) 1.04 (0.92 to 1.18) 1.11 (0.98 to 1.26) 1.11 (0.97 to 1.27) 1.12 (0.97 to 1.27)
 Model 2 multivariate–adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 (reference) 1.07 (0.93 to 1.24) 1.18 (1.00 to 1.40) 1.20 (0.98 to 1.46) 1.25 (0.97 to 1.60)
Pooled cohorts
 Age-adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 (reference) 1.11 (1.02 to 1.21) 1.26 (1.15 to 1.37) 1.37 (1.25 to 1.49) 1.67 (1.48 to 1.88) <0.001
 Model 1 multivariate–adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 (reference) 1.08 (0.94 to 1.25) 1.18 (1.04 to 1.33) 1.21 (1.07 to 1.37) 1.35 (1.03 to 1.78) 0.02
 Model 2 multivariate–adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 (reference) 1.10 (0.99 to 1.22) 1.21 (1.07 to 1.36) 1.26 (1.14 to 1.40) 1.41 (1.18 to 1.68) 0.004

Multivariate model 1 was adjusted for age, body mass index, history of diabetes, history of hypertension, use of thiazides, supplemental calcium, and intakes of fluid, calcium, sodium, fructose, oxalate, phytate, and alcohol. Multivariate model 2 was further adjusted for animal protein and potassium intake; in these models, animal protein-to-potassium ratios represent interaction terms. Medians refer to the first time period; however, dietary variables were updated over the course of the study. HPFS, Health Professionals Follow-Up Study; HR, hazard ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; NHS I, Nurses’ Health Study I; NHS II, Nurses’ Health Study II.

Association between Type of Protein and Urinary Composition

The association between the type of protein and urinary composition is reported in Supplemental Tables 4 and 5. After multivariable adjustment, compared with those in the lowest quintile, those in the highest quintile of dairy protein intake had 24 (95% CI, 16 to 32) mg/d higher urine calcium, 1.4 (95% CI, 0.5 to 2.4) mg/d lower urine oxalate, 36 (95% CI, 11 to 60) mg/d higher urine citrate, and higher relative supersaturation for calcium phosphate. Those in the highest quintile of nondairy animal protein intake had 54 (95% CI, 30 to 78) mg/d lower urine citrate, 24 (95% CI, 13 to 35) mg/d higher urine uric acid, 0.13 (95% CI, 0.09 to 0.17) lower urine pH, and higher relative supersaturation for uric acid.

Association between Potassium Intake and Urinary Composition

The association between potassium intake and urinary composition is reported in Table 6. After multivariable adjustment including total fluid intake, those in the highest quintile had 1.6 (95% CI, 0.6 to 2.5) mg/d higher urine oxalate, 39 (95% CI, 13 to 65) mg/d higher urine citrate, 26 (95% CI, 14 to 38) mg/d higher urine uric acid, 0.15 (95% CI, 0.10 to 0.19) higher urine pH, 237 (95% CI, 173 to 299) ml/d higher urine volume, and significantly lower relative supersaturations for calcium oxalate and uric acid. There was no association between potassium intake and urinary excretion of calcium.

Table 6.

Pooled adjusted mean values and 95% confidence intervals of 24-hour urine components by quintile of dietary potassium intake

Variable Quintile 1, n=1227 Quintile 2, n=1226 Quintile 3, n=1224 Quintile 4, n=1226 Quintile 5, n=1226 P Value for Trend
Median, mg/d 2641 3052 3357 3691 4162
Creatinine, g 1.3 (1.3 to 1.3) 1.3 (1.3 to 1.4) 1.3 (1.3 to 1.4) 1.4 (1.3 to 1.4) 1.3 (1.3 to 1.4) 0.12
Potassium, mEq 56.1 (54.7 to 57.5) 61.5 (60.1 to 62.8) 63.7 (62.4 to 65.0) 67.6 (66.2 to 68.9) 71.3 (69.9 to 72.7) <0.001
Calcium, mg 189 (182 to 196) 194 (188 to 201) 195 (189 to 202) 192 (185 to 198) 189 (182 to 196) 0.84
Oxalate, mg 32.6 (31.8 to 33.4) 33.1 (32.4 to 33.9) 32.9 (32.1 to 33.6) 32.9 (32.3 to 33.7) 34.2 (33.4 to 35.0) <0.01
Citrate, mg 675 (655 to 696) 681 (661 to 700) 703 (683 to 722) 696 (677 to 716) 714 (693 to 735) 0.002
Uric acid, mg 517 (507 to 526) 522 (513 to 531) 527 (518 to 536) 529 (520 to 538) 543 (533 to 552) <0.001
Sodium, mEq 151 (147 to 155) 149 (147 to 152) 148 (144 to 152) 150 (146 to 154) 149 (145 to 153) 0.51
Magnesium, mg 104 (102 to 107) 107 (105 to 110) 109 (106 to 112) 110 (108 to 113) 112 (109 to 115) <0.001
Phosphate, mg 846 (830 to 862) 866 (851 to 881) 850 (835 to 865) 873 (858 to 888) 867 (851 to 883) 0.03
Sulfate, mmol 18.2 (17.8 to 18.6) 18.6 (18.2 to 19.0) 18.7 (18.3 to 19.0) 19.1 (18.8 to 19.5) 19.4 (19.0 to 19.8) <0.001
Ammonium, mmol 29.2 (28.2 to 30.3) 30.4 (29.5 to 31.3) 28.4 (27.6 to 29.3) 29.4 (28.5 to 30.3) 29.1 (28.1 to 30.0) 0.39
pH, U 5.95 (5.92 to 5.99) 6.00 (5.97 to 6.03) 6.04 (6.01 to 6.07) 6.05 (6.02 to 6.09) 6.10 (6.06 to 6.13) <0.001
Volume, ml 1737 (1687 to 1788) 1853 (1805 to 1902) 1830 (1783 to 1877) 1878 (1829 to 1926) 1974 (1923 to 2025) <0.001
SS CaOx
 Pharmacal 1.74 (1.58 to 1.91) 1.60 (1.44 to 1.77) 1.60 (1.43 to 1.76) 1.50 (1.34 to 1.66) 1.48 (1.32 to 1.65) <0.001
 Litholink 5.80 (5.46 to 6.13) 5.56 (5.26 to 5.86) 5.54 (5.24 to 5.83) 5.25 (4.95 to 5.54) 5.07 (4.76 to 5.39) 0.001
SS CaP
 Pharmacal 1.33 (1.14 to 1.51) 1.39 (1.21 to 1.57) 1.38 (1.20 to 1.56) 1.44 (1.26 to 1.62) 1.37 (1.19 to 1.56) 0.43
 Litholink 1.09 (0.99 to 1.19) 1.07 (0.98 to 1.16) 1.14 (1.05 to 1.22) 1.07 (0.98 to 1.16) 1.06 (0.96 to 1.15) 0.21
SS UA
 Pharmacal 2.05 (1.80 to 2.30) 1.78 (1.53 to 2.02) 1.76 (1.51 to 2.00) 1.61 (1.37 to 1.85) 1.55 (1.30 to 1.80) <0.001
 Litholink 0.79 (0.72 to 0.86) 0.68 (0.62 to 0.75) 0.66 (0.60 to 0.73) 0.65 (0.59 to 0.72) 0.62 (0.55 to 0.69) 0.002

Models were adjusted for age, body mass index, history of kidney stones, history of diabetes, history of hypertension, total fluid intake, use of thiazides, supplemental calcium, intake of protein (dairy, nondairy animal, and vegetable), study cohort, urine creatinine, and sodium. Ammonium data were only available for the Nurses’ Health Study II Litholink collection. Pharmacal results are reported as relative supersaturations, whereas Litholink results as supersaturations. Medians refer to the first time period; however, dietary variables were updated over the course of the study. SS CaOx, supersaturation calcium oxalate; SS CaP, supersaturation calcium phosphate (brushite); SS UA, supersaturation uric acid.

Association between Dietary Net Acid Load and Urinary Composition

The association between APKR and urinary composition is reported in Supplemental Table 6. After multivariable adjustment including main components of APKR, those in the highest quintile had 70 (95% CI, 22 to 118) mg/d lower urine citrate, 0.16 (95% CI, 0.07 to 0.23) lower urine pH, and 140 (95% CI, 23 to 256) ml/d lower urine volume.

Associations between dietary intakes and urine composition were similar among those participants with and without a history of kidney stones.

Discussion

We found that associations between vegetable, dairy, and nondairy animal protein intake and kidney stone risk were either null or modest and of borderline statistical significance. However, different types of protein may affect the risk of kidney stones differently: in particular, vegetable protein was not associated with risk of stones, dairy protein was associated with reduced risk in younger women, and nondairy animal protein may have been associated with modestly higher risk in men and older women. In contrast, higher dietary potassium was associated with a statistically significant and large reduction in kidney stone risk in all cohorts. APKR was associated with higher risk of stones, independent of the components of APKR (animal protein and potassium intake). The 24-hour urine composition also varied by type of protein. Higher dairy protein intake was associated with higher excretion of calcium and citrate but lower oxalate and uric acid. Higher nondairy animal protein, however, was associated with significantly lower citrate, higher uric acid, and a more acidic urine. Taken together, these findings suggest that dairy protein intake might have a mixed effect on urinary lithogenic factors. The higher urinary calcium might be because of the effect of casein on intestinal calcium absorption (18) and/or the higher content of calcium present in dairy products. The latter possibility may explain the lower excretion of oxalate with higher dairy protein intake, because higher calcium in the gut can bind with oxalate, thus reducing intestinal absorption of oxalate (19). However, nondairy animal protein may have a more marked prolithogenic effect on urine composition, likely to favor calcium stone formation (because of lower citrate) and uric acid stone formation (because of lower pH and higher uric acid). Another potential mechanism through which large intakes of animal protein could affect stone risk is the increased synthesis of oxalate secondary to metabolism of amino acids, such as hydroxyproline. However, studies with controlled dietary intakes of oxalate did not find any association between intake of animal protein and urinary oxalate excretion (20). Similarly, in our study, urinary oxalate was not higher among participants with larger intakes of animal protein.

A major finding in our study is the strong inverse association between higher dietary potassium intake, a marker of dietary intake of organic anion, and risk of stones: there was a 33%–56% lower risk of stones for those participants in the highest quintile of potassium intake. Previous analyses of these cohorts reported associations of smaller magnitude for the HPFS (6) and the NHS I (4) and no association for the NHS II (5). Our updated findings are likely caused by increased statistical power. Participants in the highest quintile of potassium intake had higher urinary levels of citrate, larger urine volumes, and higher urine pH, resulting in reduced relative supersaturations for calcium oxalate and uric acid, despite higher urinary excretion of oxalate. The larger urine volume, even after adjustment for fluid intake from beverages, might be explained by the high water content in fruits and vegetables.

We also found an association between higher levels of dietary net acid load, estimated by APKR and NEAP, and a higher risk of kidney stones. Such associations were significant, even after including the respective components of the ratios in the model. An imbalance between intakes of acid-generating and alkali-generating foods, reflected in higher APKR and NEAP values, respectively, could lead to a series of metabolic derangements, including higher urinary excretion of calcium (plausibly through bone buffering because of subclinical systemic acidosis [10]), reduced excretion of citrate (11), and reduced urine pH (which would increase the risk of uric acid stones). Of note, we found significantly lower excretion of citrate and lower urine pH for higher quintiles of APKR and a higher relative supersaturation for uric acid. The APKR results may partially account for our previous finding that a dietary approaches to stop hypertension–style diet, which includes higher intakes of fruits and vegetables and lower intakes of red and processed meats, is associated with a lower risk of kidney stones in the same cohorts (21).

Our study has limitations. We did not have information on stone composition for all participants and thus, could not determine whether type of protein or estimated dietary net acid load was associated with risk of selectively forming specific stone types. Also, our study participants are predominantly white, and our results may not apply to other populations.

In conclusion, the risk of kidney stone formation associated with protein intake may vary by protein type. In contrast with vegetable and dairy protein, nondairy animal protein may be associated with a slightly higher risk of kidney stones among men and older women. Higher potassium intake is strongly associated with a lower risk of stones, and a higher estimated net dietary acid load is associated with higher risk independent of potassium intake. Our data suggest that diets rich in fruits and vegetables as well as diets with a relative abundance of fruits and vegetables compared with animal protein may represent effective interventions to prevent kidney stone formation.

Disclosures

P.M.F. discloses consultant’s fees from BioHealth Italia (Rivoli, Turin, Italy) (2014–2015). G.C.C. is a consultant for Allena Pharmaceuticals (Newton, MA), AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals (Wilmington, DE), and Exponent (Los Angeles, CA); receives royalties from UpToDate (author and Section Editor); and receives honorarium from the American Society of Nephrology (Editor-in-Chief of the Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology). All other authors have nothing to disclose.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Data

Acknowledgments

Because G.C.C. is the Editor-in-Chief of the Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, he was not involved in the peer review process for this manuscript. Another editor oversaw the peer review and decision-making process for this manuscript.

This work was supported by American Kidney Fund Clinical Scientist in Nephrology Program and National Institutes of Health research grants DK094910, DK91417, CA186107, CA176726, and CA167552.

The content of this manuscript was presented in abstract form at the 2015 American Society of Nephrology Kidney Week Meeting (San Diego, CA; November 3–8, 2015).

Footnotes

Published online ahead of print. Publication date available at www.cjasn.org.

References

  • 1.Breslau NA, Brinkley L, Hill KD, Pak CY: Relationship of animal protein-rich diet to kidney stone formation and calcium metabolism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 66: 140–146, 1988 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kok DJ, Iestra JA, Doorenbos CJ, Papapoulos SE: The effects of dietary excesses in animal protein and in sodium on the composition and the crystallization kinetics of calcium oxalate monohydrate in urines of healthy men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 71: 861–867, 1990 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dussol B, Iovanna C, Rotily M, Morange S, Leonetti F, Dupuy P, Vazi A, Saveanu A, Loundou A, Berland Y: A randomized trial of low-animal-protein or high-fiber diets for secondary prevention of calcium nephrolithiasis. Nephron Clin Pract 110: c185–c194, 2008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Curhan GC, Willett WC, Speizer FE, Spiegelman D, Stampfer MJ: Comparison of dietary calcium with supplemental calcium and other nutrients as factors affecting the risk for kidney stones in women. Ann Intern Med 126: 497–504, 1997 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Curhan GC, Willett WC, Knight EL, Stampfer MJ: Dietary factors and the risk of incident kidney stones in younger women: Nurses’ Health Study II. Arch Intern Med 164: 885–891, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Taylor EN, Stampfer MJ, Curhan GC: Dietary factors and the risk of incident kidney stones in men: New insights after 14 years of follow-up. J Am Soc Nephrol 15: 3225–3232, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lemann J Jr., Pleuss JA, Gray RW, Hoffmann RG: Potassium administration reduces and potassium deprivation increases urinary calcium excretion in healthy adults [corrected]. Kidney Int 39: 973–983, 1991 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fink HA, Wilt TJ, Eidman KE, Garimella PS, MacDonald R, Rutks IR, Brasure M, Kane RL, Ouellette J, Monga M: Medical management to prevent recurrent nephrolithiasis in adults: A systematic review for an American College of Physicians Clinical Guideline. Ann Intern Med 158: 535–543, 2013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Frassetto LA, Todd KM, Morris RC Jr., Sebastian A: Estimation of net endogenous noncarbonic acid production in humans from diet potassium and protein contents. Am J Clin Nutr 68: 576–583, 1998 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lemann J Jr., Gray RW, Maierhofer WJ, Cheung HS: The importance of renal net acid excretion as a determinant of fasting urinary calcium excretion. Kidney Int 29: 743–746, 1986 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lemann J Jr., Bushinsky DA, Hamm LL: Bone buffering of acid and base in humans. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 285: F811–F832, 2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Trinchieri A, Maletta A, Lizzano R, Marchesotti F: Potential renal acid load and the risk of renal stone formation in a case-control study. Eur J Clin Nutr 67: 1077–1080, 2013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Holmes RP, Kennedy M: Estimation of the oxalate content of foods and daily oxalate intake. Kidney Int 57: 1662–1667, 2000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Taylor EN, Curhan GC: Oxalate intake and the risk for nephrolithiasis. J Am Soc Nephrol 18: 2198–2204, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rimm EB, Giovannucci EL, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Litin LB, Willett WC: Reproducibility and validity of an expanded self-administered semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire among male health professionals. Am J Epidemiol 135: 1114–1126, 1992 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Feskanich D, Rimm EB, Giovannucci EL, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Litin LB, Willett WC: Reproducibility and validity of food intake measurements from a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. J Am Diet Assoc 93: 790–796, 1993 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Chute CG, Litin LB, Willett WC: Validity of self-reported waist and hip circumferences in men and women. Epidemiology 1: 466–473, 1990 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ferraretto A, Signorile A, Gravaghi C, Fiorilli A, Tettamanti G: Casein phosphopeptides influence calcium uptake by cultured human intestinal HT-29 tumor cells. J Nutr 131: 1655–1661, 2001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Massey LK, Roman-Smith H, Sutton RA: Effect of dietary oxalate and calcium on urinary oxalate and risk of formation of calcium oxalate kidney stones. J Am Diet Assoc 93: 901–906, 1993 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Knight J, Easter LH, Neiberg R, Assimos DG, Holmes RP: Increased protein intake on controlled oxalate diets does not increase urinary oxalate excretion. Urol Res 37: 63–68, 2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Taylor EN, Fung TT, Curhan GC: DASH-style diet associates with reduced risk for kidney stones. J Am Soc Nephrol 20: 2253–2259, 2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Data

Articles from Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN are provided here courtesy of American Society of Nephrology

RESOURCES