Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2016 Oct 7;11(10):e0164223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164223

Transcriptome Analysis of Gene Expression during Chinese Water Chestnut Storage Organ Formation

Libao Cheng 1,#, Shuyan Li 2,#, Sainan Chen 1, Yan Wang 1, Meizhen Yu 1, Xuehao Chen 1,*, Liangjun Li 1,*, Jingjing Yin 1
Editor: Yun Zheng3
PMCID: PMC5055346  PMID: 27716802

Abstract

The product organ (storage organ; corm) of the Chinese water chestnut has become a very popular food in Asian countries because of its unique nutritional value. Corm formation is a complex biological process, and extensive whole genome analysis of transcripts during corm development has not been carried out. In this study, four corm libraries at different developmental stages were constructed, and gene expression was identified using a high-throughput tag sequencing technique. Approximately 4.9 million tags were sequenced, and 4,371,386, 4,372,602, 4,782,494, and 5,276,540 clean tags, including 119,676, 110,701, 100,089, and 101,239 distinct tags, respectively, were obtained after removal of low-quality tags from each library. More than 39% of the distinct tags were unambiguous and could be mapped to reference genes, while 40% were unambiguous tag-mapped genes. After mapping their functions in existing databases, a total of 11,592, 10,949, 10,585, and 7,111 genes were annotated from the B1, B2, B3, and B4 libraries, respectively. Analysis of the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in B1/B2, B2/B3, and B3/B4 libraries showed that most of the DEGs at the B1/B2 stages were involved in carbohydrate and hormone metabolism, while the majority of DEGs were involved in energy metabolism and carbohydrate metabolism at the B2/B3 and B3/B4 stages. All of the upregulated transcription factors and 9 important genes related to product organ formation in the above four stages were also identified. The expression changes of nine of the identified DEGs were validated using a quantitative PCR approach. This study provides a comprehensive understanding of gene expression during corm formation in the Chinese water chestnut.

Introduction

The Chinese water chestnut belongs to the sedge family, and is widely cultivated throughout the world, including Asia, Australia, Africa, and the Pacific and Indian oceans. It has many uses, such as water purification and embankment protection, and its corms are also edible [1,2,3,4]. Indeed, the water chestnut is a popular aquatic vegetable because of its unique taste and the fact that it is fat-, gluten-, and cholesterol-free. It is also a critical ingredient in traditional Chinese medicine [5].

Similar to other aquatic species, this plant must be maintained in pools, water gardens, tanks, or shallow water tubs in greenhouses during the entire growth season from spring to autumn. It is often asexually propagated by directly planting a corm with a healthy apical bud into wet soil. The corm not only provides nutrition but also serves as an energy unit during the early growth of the plant. In its early developmental stage, buds first form at the end of the main stem, and then develop into stolons. The corms form at the tips of each stolon [6].

The genetic and morphometric processes involved in the formation of storage organs have been extensively studied over past decades [7,8]. Chinese water chestnuts and arrowheads share a similar developmental process in terms of underground stem morphology [9], and corm formation in both species includes an induction stage, an initial swelling stage, and a swelling stage. In the induction stage, rapid radial growth of the stolon tips occurs. In the initial stage, elongation of the stolon is terminated and the tip of the stolon begins to swell. In the swelling stage, the volume of the corm increases and nutrients such as polysaccharides, fats, and proteins are synthesized and deposited [10].

Underground formation of the storage organ can be affected by various internal and environmental factors [11] such as the photoperiod. Storage organ formation of the arrowhead is clearly regulated by the photoperiod, because short days accelerate the process of storage organ formation, whereas long days inhibit it [12]. Perceiving and responding to the photoperiod is the first step for the plant to adjust its growth and developmental processes. The leaf is the main organ that perceives the photoperiod, and the signal is then transferred to the shoot apex through the phloem. The storage organ forms at the tip of the stolon during short days. Phytochrome B (PHYB) is thought to be responsible for photoperiodic responses, and participates in storage organ development during short days. Downregulated PHYB expression leads to the promotion of storage organ formation during short or long days after elimination of the inhibition on tuberization originating from the effect of long days [13]. Flowering locus T (FT), CONSTANS (CO), and GIGANTEA are also involved in photoperiodic regulation during storage organ formation, and the CO/FT module has been shown to be required for the photoperiodic control of tuberization [14,15,16].

The photoperiod shows a relationship with gibberellic acid (GA) to control storage organ formation. Transgenic plants carrying the GA oxidase gene promote underground formation of the storage organ only under conditions of a short-day photoperiod, while earlier formation of storage organs occurs when this enzyme activity is inhibited [17]. During short days, a decrease in the gibberellin content by transgenic StBEL5 and KNOX leads to earlier formation of storage organs [18]. As well as GA, some phytohormones such as cytokinin, jasmonic acid (JA), abscisic acid, indole acetic acid, and ethylene have been identified as being involved in the formation of product organs [19,20,21,22]. For instance, axillary buds decapitated from peas and potatoes were inhibited by the exogenous application of auxin [23]. Ethylene is involved in many plant developmental processes [24,25], including the induction of storage organ formation and root bulking in carrots [26]. JA has also been shown to play an important role in plant biological processes [27]. Several studies have shown that JA has a positive effect on the swelling of underground storage organs. Endogenous JA is believed to be a strong inducer of storage organ development in dicotyledonous potato plants and monocotyledonous yam plants [28]. Moreover, Ravnikar et al. (1993) showed that exogenous JA functions in the formation of garlic bulbs [29].

Despite its importance, particularly in south China, few studies have been carried out to investigate underground corm growth of the Chinese water chestnut. Formation of the storage organ is genetically regulated, but the expression of genes involved in corm formation has not been studied in detail, although work in other species has partially described the above processes, and many storage organ-related genes have been documented [30]. An understanding of the genes expressed during corm formation is necessary to provide insights into the mechanism of corm development, which may lead to better regulation of production in the future.

DNA sequencing is an efficient approach to gain important information on genes, genetic variation, and gene function for biological processes [31,32]. Recently, many critical genes regulating growth and metabolism have been identified using a tag sequencing technique in horticultural plants [33,34]. In the present study, gene expression analysis at the transcriptional level was performed to monitor changes in biological processes during the underground formation of the storage organ [10]. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from four developmental stages of the Chinese water chestnut were sequenced and analyzed, with the aim of comprehensively understanding the process of corm formation.

Materials and Methods

Plant Materials

‘Hongbaoshi’, a species of Chinese water chestnut that is widely cultivated in China, was planted in fields at a water depth of 5–10 cm in spring, with average temperatures of 30°C in the day and 20°C at night during the entire growth season. Four or more stolons were observed to develop and elongate in the correct order on each plant. About 90–100 days after plantation, corm formation started at the stolon tips. For tag sequencing and gene expression analysis, corms from the four developmental stages (stolon, initial swelling, middle swelling, and later swelling stage) (S1 Fig) were used (four tips from different plants were combined for each stage). To obtain materials from different developmental stages, water chestnuts were cultivated in a field (non-private) located in southeastern China. Permission for sample collection was granted from the Department of Horticulture of YangZhou University, China. No specific permissions were required for the location or the field studies because the experiments did not involve any endangered or protected species.

Screening Differentially Expressed Genes

Corm transcriptomes from the four developmental stages were analyzed. Stolon tips and corms from the initial swelling, middle swelling, and later swelling stages were collected and ground, and RNA was isolated using an RNA extraction mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). DNase I was added to eliminate DNA contamination. Sequencing of transcripts in the form of special constructs was completed by the Beijing Institute of Genomics.

To screen the DEGs, transcriptomes from the four stages were analyzed with the aim of tracking major changes in metabolism. DEG libraries of the four samples were determined in parallel using Illumina gene expression sample preparation kits. Briefly, total RNA of these four stages was used for mRNA capture with magnetic oligo(dT) beads. First and second strand cDNA were synthesized, and the bead-bound cDNA was subsequently digested with NlaIII.

3′-cDNA fragments attached to oligo(dT) beads were ligated to Illumina GEX NlaIII adapter 1, which contained a recognition site for the endonuclease MmeI to enable cleavage 17 bp downstream of the recognition site (CATG) to produce tags with adapter 1. After removing the 3′ fragment with magnetic bead precipitation, an Illumina GEX adapter 2 was introduced at the MmeI cleavage site. The resulting adapter-ligated cDNA tags were amplified using PCR primers that were annealed to the adaptor ends for 15 cycles.

The 90 bp fragments were sequenced separately at the 3′ and 5′ ends of the gene (PE90), and the PCR product was recovered and purified from a 6% polyacrylamide Tris-Borate-EDTA gel. The final quality of the tagged sequences was checked using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. The four tag libraries constructed underwent Illumina proprietary sequencing for cluster generation through in situ amplification, and were deep sequenced using an Illumina Genome Analyzer. For the raw data, we filtered out adaptor sequences, low-quality tags (tags with unknown nucleotides N), empty reads, tags that were too short or too long, and tags with only one copy, to obtain clean tags. The types of clean tags were represented as distinct clean tags. Subsequently, we classified the clean tags and distinct clean tags according to their library copy number, determined their percentage in the total clean and distinct tags, and analyzed the saturation of the four libraries.

Transcriptome de novo assembly was carried out with a short read assembling program, Trinity [35]. This is comprised of three independent software modules including inchworm, chrysalis, and butterfly. RNA-seq data were assembled into unique sequences of transcripts for a dominant isoform, then these sequences were partitioned into many individual De Bruijn graphs (each graph represented the transcriptional complexity at a given gene or locus). Unigenes were obtained after each graph was independently processed to extract full-length splicing isoforms and to tease apart transcripts derived from paralogous genes. For annotation, all tags were mapped to the reference sequence from the NCBI database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), and no more than 1 bp of nucleotide mismatch was allowed. The alignment procedures were conducted by following the protocols described in the online documentation (http://maq.sourceforge.net) and adopting default parameters. To monitor mapping events on both strands, sense and complementary antisense sequences were included in the mapping process. The tags mapped to reference sequences from multiple genes were filtered. The data sets supporting the results of this article are available in the NCBI database, Submission ID: SUB1471108 and BioProject ID: PRJNA318689, which is available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/318689.

Identification of Differentially Expressed Genes

The transcriptome of the Chinese water chestnut from the four developmental stages was used as a reference for DEG screening and analysis because of the unavailability of existing data. All expressed genes were monitored, and their gene functions were explored using database annotations such as nr, Swiss-Prot, KEGG, and COG, using the criteria of BLASTx alignment (E value < 0.00001) between unigenes and protein databases such as Swiss-Prot, KEGG, and COG. The best aligned results were used to decide the sequence direction and functions of the unigenes.

In case of any conflict between the results from different databases, a priority order of nr, Swiss-Prot, KEGG, and COG was followed when deciding the sequence direction of unigenes. When a unigene aligned with none of the above databases, ESTscan was used to predict its coding region as well as to decide its sequence direction. All of the expressed unigenes were classified according to their functions in metabolic processes. For DEG screening, a false discovery rate (FDR) ≤ 0.001 and the absolute value of the log2 ratio ≥ 1 were used as thresholds to judge the significance of the difference in expression of the unigenes. All DEGs were deposited into the NCBI database under GenBank accessions KX365752 to KX365849.

Gene Expression Analysis by Quantitative PCR

To study gene expression, the cultivation conditions of the Chinese water chestnut were maintained as described above. Quantitative (q)PCR analysis was performed to quantify the transcriptional level of nine novel genes of the Chinese water chestnut at the stolon stage, initial stage, middle swelling stage, and later swelling stage, to evaluate the results of tag sequencing. Total RNA was extracted from 100 mg samples of stolon tips and corms at the initial swelling, middle swelling, and later swelling stages using an RNA extraction mini kit (Qiagen). Approximately 10 samples at each stage were the pooled. DNase I was used to digest DNA during the RNA extraction process to eliminate DNA contamination. A total of 1–2 μg of RNA was used for cDNA synthesis according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Promega, Madison, WI). qPCR was performed with the Mx3000P machine (American, agilent). SYBR Green Master Mix was used to identify mRNA levels according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Tiangen, Beijing, China). According to the sequencing results, primers were designed for genes that showed enhanced transcription during corm formation (S1 Table). β-Actin was used as an internal standard and amplified using the following primers: forward 5′-AACCTCCTCCTCATCGTACT-3′, and reverse 5′-GACAGCATCAGCCATGTTCA-3′. Amplification was performed in a 25 μL reaction mixture, containing 12.5 μL SYBR Premix Ex Taq II (Tli RNaseH Plus) (2×), 10 μM of each of the forward and reverse primer, 2 μL RT reaction solution (cDNA), and 8.5 μL dH2O. The PCR program consisted of 94°C for 30 s, then 40 cycles of 95°C for 5 s and 60°C for 60 s. qPCR reactions were performed in triplicate.

Results

Transcriptome Profile during Corm Formation

Four libraries were constructed from the four stages of corm development (the stolon stage, the initial swelling stage, the middle swelling stage, and the swelling stage) using the Illumina sequencing platform, with the aim of identifying genes relevant to corm development in the Chinese water chestnut. The transcriptomes of the four developmental stages of the corm were preprocessed before mapping the tags of each stage. About five million tags were obtained in the B1, B2, B3, and B4 libraries, with 283,469, 245,690, 209,624, and 251,126 distinct tags, respectively. Additionally, 4,371,386, 4,372,602, 4,782,494, and 5,276,540 clean tags were obtained, including 119,676, 110,701, 100,089, and 101,239 distinct clean tags in the B1, B2, B3, and B4 libraries, respectively, after filtering all raw tags with reference sequences. A detailed analysis of the tags in each library is shown in Table 1. We found that the copy distribution of the total and distinct clean tags in the four libraries was similar, with about 5% of distinct clean tags at higher than 100 copies, and about 30% of tags at 5–50 copies. The number of distinct clean tags at between two and five copies (about 60%) was higher than that of other libraries (Fig 1). To evaluate whether the sequenced tags were sufficient to cover the whole transcriptome, analysis of sequencing saturation was also carried out for the four libraries of the different developmental stages. We observed that the number of detected genes increased until the sequencing tags reached approximately four million (S2 Fig), suggesting that the tags identified in each library were sufficient to reflect the entire transcriptional information of the Chinese water chestnut genome.

Table 1. Categorization and abundance of tags.

B1 B2 B3 B4
Raw Tag Total number 4728376 4716581 4969688 4427680
Distinct Tag 283469 245690 209624 251126
Clean Tag Total number 4371386 4372602 4782494 5276540
Distinct Tag number 119676 110701 100089 101239
All Tag Mapping to Gene Total number 3147933 3200198 3905586 4571911
Total percentage of clean tag 72.01% 73.19% 81.66% 86.65%
Distinct Tag number 59110 55905 53726 59622
Distinct Tag percentage of clean tag 49.39% 50.50% 53.68% 57.81%
Unambiguous Tag Mapping to Gene Total number 2348643 2114294 1926958 795588
Total percentage of clean tag 53.73% 48.35% 40.29% 45.08%
Distinct Tag number 47086 44427 42461 46419
Distinct Tag percentage of clean tag 39.34% 40.13% 42.42% 45.71%
All Tag-mapped Genes Total number 20222 19877 19518 15486
Percentage of reference genes 52.93% 52.02% 51.08% 40.53%
Unambiguous Tag-mapped Genes Total number 14920 14581 14260 10706
Percentage of reference genes 39.05% 38.16% 37.32% 28.02%
Unknown Tag Total number 1223453 1172404 876908 704629
Total percentage of clean tag 27.99% 26.81% 18.34% 13.35%
Distinct Tag number 60566 54796 46363 41617
Distinct Tag percentage of clean tag 50.61% 49.50% 46.32% 42.19%

Fig 1. Distribution of the total clean tags and the distinct clean tags from the four libraries.

Fig 1

In total, 38,207 unigenes with an average length of 788 bp were obtained following assembly of these clean tags. Gene functions were identified using BLASTx software by comparison with the existing NCBI database, using a cut-off E value of 10–5. Of these, about 40% of all distinct sequences in the four libraries showed an above cut-off BLAST result, and about 60% did not match with known genes. All matched genes were grouped into 26 catalogues according to their annotated functions. We found that the function of catalogue with the largest number of genes was predicted, and the group with the smallest number of genes was relevant to extracellular structure (S3 Fig). The DEGs were also classified into three categories according to their function: biological process, cellular component, and molecular function. We found that the DEGs (from stolon stage to late swelling stage) were involved in various metabolisms. The number of genes in the biological process category related to cellular process and metabolism process was greater than for other processes. It was also shown that most genes in the cellular component were involved in cell, cell junction, organelle, organelle part, and membrane functions. For molecular function, many genes participated in binding, catalytic activity, and transport activity (S4 Fig).

Differentially Expressed Genes in the Four Stages of Corm Formation

Changes in gene expression during corm formation

To monitor the changes in gene expression, four libraries at different developmental stages of the corm were constructed. A total of 11,592, 10,949, 10,585, and 7,111 transcripts were identified from the B1, B2, B3, and B4 libraries, respectively. Of these, 9,567, 8,921, and 6,445 genes were similarly expressed in the B1/B2, B2/B3, and B3/B4 stages, respectively (Fig 2 and S2 Table). Within these four libraries, we also found a large number of genes that changed expression during corm development, suggesting that the storage organ formation process is highly complex at the molecular level. The number of genes per million clean tags was used to evaluate the abundance of transcripts in the four libraries.

Fig 2. Analysis of tag-mapped genes of the four corm developmental stages in the Chinese water chestnut.

Fig 2

In the B1/B2 stages, 1,027 genes changed expression; of these, the expression of 315 genes was enhanced and that of 712 genes was decreased. In the B2/B3 stages, 182 genes were identified as upregulated and 1,014 were downregulated. In the B3/B4 stages, we observed enhanced expression of 106 genes and decreased expression of 3,213 genes. In summary, the number of transcripts in the B1/B2 libraries showed a smaller change compared with the B1/B4 libraries, indicating that the development of the corm from the stolon stage to the initial swelling stage differs from that from the initial swelling stage to the swelling stage (Table 2).

Table 2. DEGs across all libraries.

All genes mapped to the reference sequence and genome sequences were examined for their expression differences across different libraries. The numbers of differentially expressed genes represent transcripts, using threshold values of FDR ≤ 0.001 and log2 ratio ≥ 1 for controlling false discovery rates. B1, B2, B3, and B4 represent the samples that were collected at the stolon stage, the initial swelling stage, the middle swelling stage, and the later swelling stage of the corm, respectively.

B1:B2 B1:B3 B1:B4 B2:B3 B2:B4 B3:B4
Total 1027 2294 4933 1196 4099 3319
Up-regulated 315 417 145 182 61 106
Down-regulated 712 1877 4788 1014 4038 3213

Differentially expressed genes at each stage

During corm development of the Chinese water chestnut, we found that a large number of genes altered their expression at the B1/B2, B2/B3, and B3/B4 stages. Therefore, 20 DEGs showing high levels of change were selected at the B1/B2, B2/B3, and B3/B4 stages to monitor the metabolic process during corm formation.

We observed that two types of hormone, indole acetic acid (indole-3-acetic acid-amido synthetase) and gibberellin (gibberellin 20-oxidase), were involved in the process from the stolon stage to the initial formation stage. A cation/calcium exchanger showed enhanced expression during this period, suggesting that Ca2+ has a close relationship with corm formation. We also found increased expression of malic enzyme participating in energy metabolism. In the B2/B3 libraries, two genes were involved in storage metabolism: the glutathione s-transferase gene and the soluble starch synthase gene. We also found altered expression of extensin protein, which is related to corm swelling. Some genes such as calmodulin-like protein and calcium-dependent protein kinase involved in Ca2+ signal regulation demonstrated increased transcriptional levels from the initial swelling stage to the middle swelling stage. In the B3/B4 libraries, we found that four genes showed enhanced expression, glutathione s-transferase, starch branching enzyme, aldose reductase-related protein, and proline-rich receptor-like protein kinase, which are involved in substance metabolism. Two genes, ATPase and NADP-dependent malic enzyme, relevant to energy metabolism also showed increased transcriptional levels (Table 3).

Table 3. The 20 most differentially expressed annotated genes in the B1/B2, B2/B3, and B3/B4 libraries, based on expressed tag frequency.
Gene ID Abundant (TMP ratio) P-Value FDR Function annotation
In B1/B2 stages
B4958 10.13 0 0 Putative zinc finger protein
B512 9.84 0 0 Glycine-rich Cell wall protein
B8571 9.10 0 0 Cytochrome P450 monooxygenase CYP706A12
B4367 7.10 0 0 Cation/Calcium exchanger 3-like
B9242 6.51 0 0 Malic enzyme
B1629 8.21 0 0 Pathogenesis-related protein 10a
B9067 8.10 0 0 Carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase 4, Chloroplastic-like3
B5444 8.10 0 0 Peroxidase 72 precursor
B16992 8.0 0 0.00098 Protein VAC14 homolog
B3517 7.98 0.000018 0.00071 Granule-bound starch synthase
B7629 7.84 0.0012 0.00118 indole-3-acetic acid-amido synthetase
B5325 7.84 0.000057 0.00447 Auxin efflux carrier component 4-like
B4260 7.67 0.000089 0.00124 Plant synaptotagmin
B9579 7.52 0.0088 0.00168 Bzip Transcription factor ABI5
B3968 7.32 0.0041 0.00478 Nodule protein Dg93-like protein
B15737 7.10 0.00058 0.00065 Gibberellin 20 oxidase
B1046 7.10 0.000007 0.0078 Jacalin-like lectin domain containing protein
B9809 7.09 0.000078 0.00045 Exportin-T-like
B4439 7.09 0.000787 0.0089 ATP phosphoribosyl transferase-like
B13033 7.00 0.00897 0.00513 Helicase
In B2/B3 stages
B6413 11.23 0 0 BTB/POZ and MATH domain-containing protein 2-like
B3872 11.12 0 0 Protein cornichon homolog 1-like
B7997 10.9 0 0 RNA polymerase beta'' subunit, partial
B1399 10.88 0 0 Pathogenesis-related transcriptional activator PTI6
B5860 10.58 0 0 F-box/kelch-repeat protein At5g42350-like
B1587 10.34 0 0 Two-component response regulator ARR9-like
B2484 10.02 0 0 Calcium dependent protein kinase
B3579 9.85 0 00.0008 Extensin
B12950 9.80 0.00072 0 Auxin-responsive family protein
B9404 9.75 0.00007 0.00007 Transcriptional corepressor LEUNIG-like
B2331 9.56 0.000071 0.00005 E3 ubiquitin protein ligase RIE1-like
B13803 9.10 0.000001 0.00004 Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1-like
B18064 8.54 0.000487 0.00001 Calmodulin-like protein
B18107 7.06 0.00054 0.00047 Soluble starch synthase
B5513 7.05 0.000824 0.00471 NAC protein 1
B15529 6.89 0.000004 0.00015 Malic acid transport protein
B6456 6.65 0.002528 0.00987 NA-directed RNA polymerase II 135 kDa polypeptid
B1561 5.89 0.000006 0.00001 Aldo-keto reductase family 1, member B1
B3517 5.68 0.000212 0.00156 Granule-bound starch synthase
B17903 5.28 0.00009 0.00004 Cellulose synthase BoclesA1
In B3/B4 stages
B6425 12.58 0 0 Multiprotein-bridging factor
B11692 12.41 0 0 Altered inheritance rate of mitochondria protein 25-like
B5552 11.87 0 0 Cytochrome P450
B15917 11.25 0 0 Heat shock protein
B9585 10.69 0 0 ATPase
B12136 10.58 0 0 Aldose reductase-related protein
B4846 10.25 0 0 Metallothionein-like
B13146 10.02 0 0 Alanine—tRNA ligase
B18689 9.98 0 0.0047 NADP-dependent alkenal double bond reductase P2
B15946 9.87 0.000007 0.00002 Anthocyanidin 5,3-O-glucosyltransferase-like
B6311 9.48 0.000878 0.00047 Glutathione S-transferase
B3976 9.25 0.000045 0.00041 Starch branching enzyme
B11531 8.45 0.000001 0.00787 Mitotic checkpoint serine/threonine-protein kinase
B8401 8.01 0.000147 0.00001 Proline-rich receptor-like protein kinase
B16616 7.88 0.00074 0.00065 NADP-dependent malic enzyme
B16477 7.58 0.00064 0.00001 Shaggy-related protein kinase
B4000 7.14 0.000077 0.00004 Cytochrome P450 CYP84A33
B8396 6.25 0.000877 0.00047 Transcriptional regulator ATRX-like
B7345 6.24 0.000044 0.00001 ABA response element binding factor
B6184 5.21 0.000245 0.00071 Ferritin

We also identified the expression of all transcription factors during corm formation. We found that 15, 16, and eight transcription factors were upregulated in the B1/B2, B2/B3, and B3/B4 stages, respectively (Table 4). In the B1/B2 stages, two of the transcription factors were ethylene-responsive factors (ethylene-responsive transcription factor 9 and AP2 transcription factor), which indicated that ethylene plays an important role from the stolon stage to the initial swelling stage. The expression of some important transcription factors, such as bZIP transcription factor ABI5, WRKY, MYB, and MYC was also found to increase during this period. In the B2/B3 stages, aside from ethylene-responsive factors (ethylene-responsive transcription factor CRF4, AP2 domain class transcription factor, and ethylene-responsive transcription factor 1A), we observed that the expression of CaM-binding transcription factors was also increased. The extensin gene, related to corm swelling, increased its transcriptional level during the initial swelling stage to the middle swelling stage. In the B3/B4 stages, three transcription factors (ERF1 transcription factor, ethylene-responsive transcription factor 5-like, and ethylene-responsive transcription factor 4), involved in ethylene signal transduction, were increased. Additionally, bZIP transcription factor ABI5, transcription factor HBP-1a(c14), and heat shock transcription factor A2 showed enhanced expression during the middle swelling stage to the swelling stage. These gene expression data show that the ethylene signal transduction pathway plays a critical role throughout the entire period of corm formation.

Table 4. Expression abundance of some corm formation-related genes identified previously.

TMP, transcripts per million clean tags.

Gene ID P-Value Function annotation (species)
B1/B2 libraries
B9579 0.00391 bZIP transcription factor ABI5 [Zea mays]
B7116 0.00625 GATA transcription factor [Ricinus communis]
B8501 0.00761 MYB transcription factor MYB17 [Saccharum]
B166 0.0178 WRKY protein [Cucumis sativus]
B13196 0.01537 EIL transcription factor [Zea mays]
B8590 0.0539 Transcription factor ATR2-like [Glycine max]
B13714 0.01250 PHD finger transcription facto [Zea mays]
B4287 0.05680 Zinc finger CCCH domain-containing protein 9 [Brachypodium distachyon]
B9031 0.6587 Trihelix transcription factor GT-2-like [Glycine max]
B2726 0.00 NAC domain protein, IPR003441 [Populus trichocarpa]
B12350 0.0250 MIXTA-like transcription factor [Lotus japonicus]
B16223 0.02500 Heat shock transcription factor [Cenchrus americanus]
B1203 0.0280 AP2 transcription factor [Triticum aestivum]
B490 0.000902 Ethylene-responsive transcription factor 9 [Glycine max]
B16370 0.02670 Transcription factor MYC2-like [Vitis vinifera]
B2/B3 libraries
B13987 0.04060 Trihelix transcription factor GT-1 isoform 1 [Vitis vinifera]
B3355 0.07780 Ethylene-responsive transcription factor CRF4 [Brachypodium distachyon]
B413 0.07780 Scarecrow-like transcription factor PAT1-like [Vitis vinifera]
B6370 0.01480 Homeobox protein HD1 [Zea mays]
B8911 0.01480 Myb-related protein 306 [Brachypodium distachyon]
B8517 0.01480 Transcription factor HBP-1b [Brachypodium distachyon]
B16129 0.0284 GRAS family transcription factor [Populus trichocarpa]
B7244 0.0274 Transcription factor PIF5-like [Glycine max]
B2141 0.0547 GATA transcription factor 26-like [Glycine max]
B2733 0.285 MADS box transcription factor [Elaeis guineensis]
B7071 0.0036 AP2 domain class transcription factor [Malus x domestica]
B40 0.00487 CaM-binding transcription factor [Oryza sativa]
B5637 0.0006 Transcription factor PIF5-like [Vitis vinifera]
B166 0.0128061 WRKY protein [Cucumis sativus]
B3407 0.039235 Ethylene-responsive transcription factor 1A [Medicago truncatula]
B1381 0.0035191 General transcription factor IIH subunit 2-like [Brachypodium distachyon]
B3/B4 libraries
B6147 1.81E-05 Heat shock transcription factor A2 [Vitis vinifera]
B7672 0.011465 ERF1 transcription factor [Vitis pseudoreticulata]
B7672 0.041667 Ethylene-responsive transcription factor 5-like [Vitis vinifera]
B8590 0.1389 Transcription factor BHLH6 [Arabidopsis thaliana]
B9579 0.0156 bZIP transcription factor ABI5 [Zea mays]
B13684 0.0151426 Transcription factor HBP-1a(c14) [Triticum aestivum]
B8331 0.0288674 Transcription factor KAN4-like [Vitis vinifera]
B5811 0.04609146 Ethylene-responsive transcription factor 4 [Zea mays]

Expression profiling of genes related to corm formation

RNA sequencing data were compared with previous reports to identify whether our expression model had coverage of well-defined genes. Expression profiling showed that 10 genes were related to corm formation. Detailed expression data of these genes and the biological processes involved in plant metabolism are listed in Table 5. We found that five genes, GIGANTEA, FRUITFUL-like protein, Cycling Dof Factor, BEL1-like HD transcription factor, and Lipoxygenase, showed increased expression during corm swelling, while five were downregulated: zinc finger CONSTANS-like protein, MADS-box transcription factor, SFT family, sucrose synthase, and phytochrome B.

Table 5. Expression abundance of some corm formation-related genes identified previously.

TMP, transcripts per million clean tags.

Gene ID Assetion TPM-B1 TPM-B2 TPM-B3 TPM-B4 Function annotation References
B15483 gi|225446176 2.97 0.46 0.01 0.01 zinc finger CONSTANS-like protein [15]
B3312 gi|170280687 0.01 0.01 1.05 0.01 GIGANTEA (clock-regulated protein) [36]
B12118 gi|357117348 2.29 2.29 1.88 0.57 MADS-box transcription factor [37]
B7616 gi|157674589 1.83 0.91 2.72 0.38 FRUITFUL-like protein [36]
B16198 gi|357124493 10.75 9.15 6.27 1.71 SFT family [38]
B5152 gi|15232818 0.01 0.46 0.42 0.01 Cycling Dof Factor [39]
B8880 gi|359474075 0.01 0.69 0.01 0.01 BEL1-like HD transcription factor [40]
B7173 gi|55741123 626.1 325 198.6 3.98 Sucrose synthase [11]
B1387 gi|10505183 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.38 Lipoxygenase [41]
B2632 gi|39777289 1.83 1.41 0.63 0.01 Phytochrome B [42]

qPCR gene expression analysis

To further monitor gene expression profiling, nine genes related to corm formation, including zinc finger protein CONSTANS-LIKE, GIGANTEA-like protein, MADS-box transcription factor, SFT2 transport protein, dof zinc finger protein DOF1.7, sucrose synthase, lipoxygenase, FRUITFUL-like protein, and BEL1-like HD transcription factor, underwent qPCR analysis of transcriptional levels. A similar gene expression pattern was observed for seven of the genes by qPCR and tag sequencing methods during corm formation, suggesting that the results of the two techniques correlate with each other. Only one gene showed a difference in expression by the qPCR technique compared with the tag sequencing analysis (Fig 3).

Fig 3. Validation of tag-mapped genes from the four stages of the Chinese water chestnut by qPCR.

Fig 3

Discussion

The high-throughput tag sequencing technique is an effective approach for monitoring gene expression of the whole plant genome, and many metabolic mechanisms have been identified using this method [34,43]. It was previously demonstrated that storage organ formation is regulated by both genetic and environmental factors [15]. In this study, approximately five million tags were identified at the stolon stage, initial stage, middle swelling stage, and later swelling stage (B1, B2, B3, and B4), with 283,469, 245,690, 209,624, and 251,126 distinct tags, respectively. However, only 52.93%, 52.02%, 51.08%, and 40.53% of genes at the four stages were mapped to reference genes because of the unavailability of a complete genome of the Chinese water chestnut (Tables 1 and 2).

COG and GO function classification were applied to analyze these expressed genes, and detailed information is shown in S3 and S4 Figs. Some genes relevant to corm formation were found, and some differences in gene expression between tag sequencing analysis and qPCR were identified. This could be explained by differences in sample collection conditions between the two methods. Alternatively, differences in the corm development stage may have caused differences in expression profiling. Samples were collected according to corm size and classified into the same developmental stage, although differences in growth periods could cause some corms to be larger or smaller than average. Additionally, RNA-seq focuses on the whole transcriptome, so disturbances of bias during sequencing are difficult to avoid, and gene expression changes are determined according to the number of reads. However, qPCR concentrates on the expression of a specific gene so is more reliable at reflecting gene transcription during plant metabolism.

Survival in an Anaerobic Environment

The entire growth season of the Chinese water chestnut must be maintained in shallow water, so the plant would be expected to develop molecular mechanisms to adapt to anaerobic conditions. We observed that many genes showed an altered expression profile during corm formation (Fig 2), of which some were related to anaerobic adaptation such as genes encoding alcohol dehydrogenase (B4394), NADH dehydrogenase (B2836), superoxide dismutase (B13999), CDPK (B806), MYB transcription factor (B8501), ethylene responsive transcription factor (B490), and ATPase (B227); these showed increased expression during corm formation (Table 3 and S2 Table). These genes also showed enhanced expression in the lotus root and arrowhead during storage organ formation [10, 44].

Many reports show that plant products and quality are often destroyed by anaerobic environments [45,46,47,48], which can lead to the starvation of people who depend on these crops. Compared with these xerophytes, aquatic plants such as the lotus root, arrowhead, water celery, and Chinese water chestnut show increased adaptations to anaerobic conditions [44,49]. The expression of some key genes, including ethylene responsive factor, alcohol dehydrogenase, SOD, and HSP, is an essential strategy for plants to survive during storage organ formation [50,51,52,53,54]; therefore, increased transcriptional levels of alcohol dehydrogenase are necessary for aquatic plants to maintain normal growth under anaerobic conditions.

Hormonal Signal Transduction during Corm Formation

Formation of the storage organ is affected by genetic and environmental factors [11], and hormonal signal transduction is necessary for its development. We found that several ethylene-responsive factors (B0/B1: ethylene-responsive transcription factor 9; B2/B3: ethylene-responsive transcription factor 1A, and ethylene-responsive transcription factor CRF4; B3/B4: ethylene-responsive transcription factor 4, ethylene-responsive transcription factor 5-like, and ERF1 transcription factor) showed enhanced expression during corm formation (Tables 3 and 4), suggesting that the ethylene signal transduction pathway is necessary for corm development in the Chinese water chestnut.

Ethylene is involved in various biological processes [55, 56], and has been suggested to be a promoter of plant growth and development or the anaerobic response [57]. Aside from biotic and abiotic stress, ethylene has many other functions, such as cell division, plant height, and the underground formation of storage organs [58]. Constitutive expression of an AP2 domain class transcription factor previously resulted in increased resistance to abiotic stress in the potato plant, and a transgenic plant showed decreased cell size, plant height, hypocotyl elongation, and fertility [59]. It has also been reported that transgenic plants expressing some AP2 domain class transcription factors have altered flowering times [60]. WRI1, a putative AP2 domain class transcription factor, was reported to regulate seed development in Arabidopsis, and transgenic plants with this gene have a higher content of seeds and triacylglycerols [61]. The storage content is altered in transgenic rice plants with an AP2 domain class transcription factor because of the control of expression of the waxy gene [62]. In this study, we found that several ethylene-responsive factors and AP2 domain class transcription factors showed enhanced expression during corm formation, and we believe that expression of AP2 domain class transcription factors is relevant to the development of the Chinese water chestnut storage organ.

There is increasing evidence for GA and JA in storage organ formation. Stolon elongation was previously found to be promoted and storage organ formation inhibited by a high GA content [63]. An increased GA content in transgenic plants with the GA oxidase gene requires a longer duration of short-day photoperiods for storage organ formation, while this formation is accelerated when enzyme activity is decreased [17]. In a dwarf mutant of Solanum tuberosum ssp. Andigena, storage organ formation occurred during both long and short days because the GA content was decreased. Interestingly, it has also been shown that formation of the storage organ can be affected by conditions of short days when GA biosynthesis is totally inhibited [19]. This evidence indicates that GA plays an important role in storage organ formation, which is directly regulated by the photoperiod. In the present study, expression of the GA 20-oxidase gene (B15737), which is involved in GA biosynthesis, was increased during B1/B2 stages (the stolon stage to the initial stage) (Table 3), suggesting that a high level of GA probably benefited elongation of the stolon.

JA has also been shown to be involved in plant metabolism and the stress response [64, 65]. For example, endogenous JA was identified as a necessary inducer of storage organs in potatoes and yams [66]. Ravnikar et al. (1993) suggested that exogenous JA is involved in garlic bulb formation [67], while Zeas et al. (1997) suggested that JA not only induces the formation of storage organs, but also increases their number. The same phenomenon is also found in Pterostylis sanguinea, where the exogenous application of JA promotes tuber formation [68].

Some genes, including MYB, transcription factor bHLH, bZIP, AP2/ERF domain-containing transcription factor, and lipoxygenase, which have previously been demonstrated to promote organ formation [69,70,71,72,73], were increased during corm formation in the present study. We list some genes with a role in storage organ formation [74,75,76,77,78] in Table 5. Overall, the expression profiles of these genes show that corm formation is highly complex and regulated by multiple genes.

DEGs Involved in the Ca2+ Signal Transduction Pathway during Corm Formation

We found that three proteins relevant to Ca2+ signaling, including a calmodulin-like protein (B18064), CaM-binding transcription factor (B40), and a calcium-dependent protein kinase (B2484), showed enhanced expression during corm formation (Tables 2 and 5). Ca2+ is a second messenger molecule that is involved in many biological processes [79]. Calmodulin perceives the signal when Ca2+ and CaM are combined (Ca2+/CaM), and then modulates the cellular response [80]. Ca2+/CaM has also been shown to be closely associated with storage organ formation [81]. In transgenic potato plants, constitutive expression of CaM affects the underground shape and size of tubers [82]. CaM-binding proteins were also reported to be involved in the formation of storage organs [83, 84]. These findings indicate that the Ca2+ signal transduction pathway is necessary for the development of storage organs. Therefore, the increased expression of calmodulin-like protein, CaM-binding transcription factor, and calcium-dependent protein kinase genes in our present study further demonstrates that Ca2+ signaling is critical for the formation of storage organs.

Conclusions

We analyzed gene expression during corm formation in the Chinese water chestnut using high-throughput tag sequencing. In total, 4,371,386, 4,372,602, 4,782,494, and 5,276,540 clean tags, including 119,676, 110,701, 100,089, and 101,239 distinct tags, were obtained at each stage, respectively (B1: the stolon stage, B2: the initial swelling stage, B3: the middle swelling stage, and B4: the late swelling stage). Of these, 11,592, 10,949, 10,585, and 7,111 genes were annotated from the B1, B2, B3, and B4 stage, respectively, after mapping their functions in existing databases. A number of DEGs were found in the B1/B2, B2/B3, and B3/B4 stages during corm formation, and 10 important storage organ formation genes were also identified. qPCR results were highly correlated with those of tag sequencing analysis.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Developmental stages of the Chinese water chestnut, including the stolon stage, the initial stage, the middle swelling stage, and the later swelling stage.

(JPG)

S2 Fig. Sequencing saturation analysis of four libraries.

B1: stolon stage; B2: initial swelling stage; B3: middle swelling stage; B4: later swelling stage.

(JPG)

S3 Fig. GOG function classification of genes expressed during corm formation.

All genes identified in the B1/B2, B2/B3, and B3/B4 libraries were classified into 25 classifications according to their function.

(JPG)

S4 Fig. GO analysis of genes expressed during corm formation.

The percentage and number of genes involved in biological process, cellular component, and molecular function was analyzed using GO Slim Assignment.

(JPG)

S1 Table. Information on the genes expressed in the B1/B2, B2/B3, and B3/B4 libraries.

(DOC)

S2 Table. Primers for genes related to corm formation.

(XLS)

Acknowledgments

We thank Edanz Group Ltd for their editorial assistance. We also extend our thanks to members of the Beijing Institute of Genomics for their cooperation in obtaining the high-throughput sequence assembly of the Chinese water chestnut. This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China (BK20151307), the Natural Science Fund for Colleges and Universities in Jiangsu Province, China (14KJB210012), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation funded project (2013M541738) and Interdisciplinary Subject Fund of Yangzhou University, China (jcxk2015-15), and the Science and Technology Support Project of Jangsu Province (BE2013388).

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China (BK20151307), the Natural Science Fund for Colleges and Universities in Jiangsu Province, China (14KJB210012), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation funded project (2013M541738) and Interdisciplinary Subject Fund of Yangzhou University, China (jcxk2015-15), and the Science and Technology Support Project of Jangsu Province (BE2013388). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Wu SJ, Yu L (2015) Preparation and characterisation of the oligosaccharides derived from Chinesewater chestnut polysaccharides. Food Chem. 181: 15–18. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.02.066 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tsuchiya T, Iwaki H (1979) Impact of nutrient enrichment in a water chestnut ecosystem at Takahamairi Bay of Lake Kasumigaura, Japan II. Role of water chestnut in primary productivity and nutrient uptake. Water Air Soil Pollut. 12:503–510. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tsuchiya T, Iwakuma T (1993) Growth and leaf life-span of a floating leaved plant, Trapa natans L., as influenced by nitrogen influx. Aquat Bot. 46:317–324. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hummel M, Kiviat E (2004) Review of World Literature on water chestnut with implications for management in North America. J Aquat Plant Manage. 42: 17–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhan G, Pan LQ, Mao SB, Zhang W, Wei YY, Tu K (2014) Study on antibacterial properties and major bioactive constituents of Chinese water chestnut (Eleocharis dulcis) peels extracts/fractions. Eur Food Res Technol. 238: 789–796. 10.1007/s00217-013-2151-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Han SS (1993) Reproductive growth and competitive ecology of arrowhead (Sagittaria trifolia L.)-(1)-Growth and tuber formation of arrowhead under several environmental factors. Korean J of Weed Sci. 13: 138–150. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Paiva E, Lister RM, Park WD (1983) Induction and accumulation of major tuber proteins of potato in stems and petioles. Plant Physiol. 71: 161–168. 10.1104/pp.71.1.161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Park WM (1983) Tuber proteins of potato-a new and surprising molecular system. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 1: 61–66. 10.1007/BF02680300 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Baksh SI, Richards JH (2006) An architectural model for Eleocharis: Morphology and development of Eleocharis cellulosa (Cyperaceae). Am J Bot. 93: 707–715. 10.3732/ajb.93.5.707 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cheng LB, Li SY, Xu XY, Hussain J, Yin JJ, Zhang Y, et al. (2013) Identification of differentially expressed genes relevant to corm formation in Sagittaria trifolia. Plos ONE. 8: e54573 10.1371/journal.pone.0054573 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fernie AR, Willmitzer L (2001) Molecular and biochemical triggers of potato tuber development. Plant Physiol. 127:1459–1465. 10.1104/pp.010764 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Shigeya Y, Hisao K, Kunikazu U (1981) Effects of Photoperiodic Treatment on Growth and Propagule Production of Arrowhead, Sagittaria trifolia L. J Weed Sci Technol. 26: 118–122. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jackson SD (1999) Multiple signaling pathways control tuber induction in potato. Plant Physiol. 119: 1–8. 10.1104/pp.119.1.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Inui H, Ogura Y, Kiyosue T (2010) Overexpression of Arabidopsis thaliana LOV KELCH REPEAT PROTEIN 2 promotes tuberization in potato (Solanum tuberosum cv. May Queen). FEBS Lett. 584:2393–2396. 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.04.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Martinez-Garcia JF, Virgos-Soler A, Prat S (2002) Control of photoperiod-regulated tuberization in potato by the Arabidopsis flowering-time gene constans. PNAS. 99: 15211–15216. 10.1073/pnas.222390599 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kim WY, Fujiwara S, Suh SS, Kim J, Kim Y, Han L (2007) ZEITLUPE is a circadian photoreceptor stabilized by GIGANTEA in blue light. Nat. 449:356–360. 10.1038/nature06132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Carrera E, Bou J, Garcia-Martinez JL, Prat S (2000) Changes in GA 20-oxidase gene expression strongly affect stem length, tuber induction and tuber yield of potato plants. Plant J. 22: 247–256. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00736.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Inui H, Ogura Y, Kiyosue T (2010) Overexpression of Arabidopsis thaliana LOV KELCH REPEAT PROTEIN 2 promotes tuberization in potato (Solanum tuberosum cv. May Queen). FEBS Lett. 584:2393–2396. 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.04.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Vreugdenhil D, Struik PC (1989) An integrated view of the hormonal regulation of tuber formation in potato (Solanum tuberosum). Physiol Plant. 75: 525–531. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1989.tb05619.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jasik J, de Klerk GJ (2006) Effect of methyl jasmonate on morphology and dormancy development in lily bulblets regenerated in vitro. J Plant Growth Regu. 25: 45–51. 10.1007/s00344-005-0048-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kim KJ, Kim KS (2005) Changes of endogenous growth substances during bulb maturation after flowering in Lilium oriental hybrid ‘Casa Blanca’. Acta Hort. 570: 661–667. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Usha PR, Rajasekaran RL, Claude DC, Samuel KA, Kevin JS (2011) Role of ethylene and jasmonic acid on rhizome induction and growth in rhubarb (Rheum rhabarbarum L.). Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult. 105:253–263. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mingo-Castel AM, Smith OE, Kumamoto J (1976) Studies on the carbon dioxide promotion and ethylene inhibition of tuberizaton in potato explants cultured in vitro. Plant Physiol. 57: 480–485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Usha PR, Rajasekaran RL, Claude DC, Samuel KA, Kevin JS (2011) Role of ethylene and jasmonic acid on rhizome induction and growth in rhubarb (Rheum rhabarbarum L.). Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult. 105:253–263. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Abeles FB, Morgan PW, Saltveit ME Jr (1992) Ethylene in Plant Biology. San Diego: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Neuteboom CE, Lada RL, Caldwell CD, Eaton L, Havard P (2001) Ethephon and spermidine enhance bulking in dicer carrots (Daucus carota var. sativus). PGRSAQ. 30: 77. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sembdner G, Parthier B (1993) The biochemistry and the physiological and molecular actions of jasmonates. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 44: 569–589. 10.1146/annurev.pp.44.060193.003033 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Koda Y (1992) The role ofjasmonic acid and related compounds in the regulation of plant development. Int Rev Cytol. 135:155–199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ravnikar M, Zel J, Plaper I, Spacapan A (1993) Jasmonic Acid Stimulates Shoot and Bulb Formation of Garlic In Vitro. J Plant Growth Regul. 12:73–77. 10.1007/BF00193236 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wang QQ, Liu F, Chen XS, Ma XJ, Zeng HQ, Yang ZM (2010) Transcriptome profiling of early developing cotton fiber by deep-sequencing reveals significantly differential expression of genes in a fuzzless/lintless mutant. Genomics. 96: 369–376. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2010.08.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mach J (2011) Unpureeing the tomato layers of information revealed by microdissection and high-throughput transcriptome sequencing. Plant Cell. 10.1105/tpc.111.231111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wang FD, Li LB, Li HY, Liu LF, Zhang YH, Gao JW (2012) Transcriptome analysis of rosette and folding leaves in Chinese cabbage using high-throughput RNA sequencing. Genomics. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2012.02.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Qi XH, Xu XW, Lin XJ, Zhang WJ, Chen XH (2011) Identification of differentially expressed genes in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) root under waterlogging stress by digital gene expression profile. Genomics. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2011.12.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mach J (2011) Unpureeing the tomato layers of information revealed by microdissection and high-throughput transcriptome sequencing. Plant Cell. 10.1105/tpc.111.231111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA, Amit I, et al. (2011). "Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome." Nat biotech. 29: 644–52. 10.1038/nbt.1883 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Abelenda JA, Navarro C, Prat S (2011). From the model to the crop: genescontrolling tuber formation in potato. Cur Opin in Biotech 22: 287–292. 10.1016/j.copbio.2010.11.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hannapel DJ, Miller J C, Park WD (1985) Regulation of Potato Tuber ProteinAccumulation by Gibberellic Acid. Plant Physiol 78: 700–703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Krieger U, Lippman ZB, Zamir D (2010) The flowering gene single flower trussdrives heterosis for yield in tomato. Nat Genet 42: 459–463. 10.1038/ng.550 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Imaizumi T, Kay SA (2006) Photoperiodic control of flowering: not only bycoincidence. Trands in Plant Sci 11: 550–558. 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.09.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Banerjee AK, Chatterjee M, Yu Y, Suh SG, Miller WA, Hannapek DJ (2006).Dynamics of a mobile a RNA of potato involved in a long distance signalingpathway. Plant Cell 18: 3443–3457. 10.1105/tpc.106.042473 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kolomiets MV, Hannapel DJ, Chen H, Tymeson M, Gladon RJ (2001)Lipoxygenase is involved in the control of potato tuber development. Plant Cell 13: 613–626. 10.1105/tpc.13.3.613 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Jackson SD, Heyer A, Dietze J, Prat S (1996) Phytochrome B mediates the photoperiodic control of tuber formation in potato. Plant J. 9: 159–166. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1996.09020159.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wu T, Qin ZW, Zhou XY, Feng Z, Du YL (2010) Transcriptome profile analysis of floral sex determination in cucumber. J Plant Physiol. 167: 905–913. 10.1016/j.jplph.2010.02.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Cheng LB, Li SY, Yin JJ, Li LJ, Chen XH (2013) Genome-wide analysis of differentially expressed genes relevant to rhizome formation in lotus root (Nelumbo Nucifera Gaertn). Plos ONE. 8: e67116 10.1371/journal.pone.0067116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Perata P, Alpi A (1993) Plant responses to anaerobiosis. Plant Sci. 93: 1–7. 10.1016/0168-9452(93)90029-Y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Subbaiah CC, Zhang J, Sachs MM (1994) Involvement of intracellular calcium in anaerobic gene expression and survival of maize seeding. Plant Physiol. 105: 369–376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Vartapetian BB, Jackson MB (1997) Plant adaptations to anaerobic stress. Ann Bot. 79: 3–30. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a010303 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ishizawa A, Murakami S, Kawakami Y, Kuramochi H (1999) Growth and energy status of arrowhead tubers, pondweed turions and rice seeding under anoxic conditions. Plant Cell Environ. 22: 505–514. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Crawford RMM, Braendle R (1996) Oxygen deprivation stress in a changing environment. J Exp Bot. 47: 145–159. 10.1093/jxb/47.2.145 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Jung SH, Lee JY, Lee DH (2003) Use of SAGE technology to reveal changes in gene expression in Arabidopsis leaves undergoing cold stress. Plant Mol Biol. 52:553–567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Shiao TL, Ellis MH, Dolferus R, Dennis ES, Doran PM (2002) Overexpression of alcohol dehydrogenase or pyruvate decarboxylase improves growth of hairy roots at reduced oxygen concentrations. Biotechnol Bioeng. 77:455–461. 10.1002/bit.10147 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Baxter-Burrell A, Chang R, Springer P, Bailey-Serres J (2003) Gene and enhancer traptransposable elements reveal oxygen deprivation-regulated genes and their complex patterns of expression in Arabidopsis. AnnBot. 91:129–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Xie ZD, Li DM, Wang LJ, Sack FD, Grotewold E (2010) Role of the stomatal development regulators FLP/MYB88 in abiotic stress responses. Plant J. 64: 731–739. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04364.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hoeren FU, Dolferus R, Wu Y, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES (1998) Evidence for a role for AtMYB2 in the induction of the Arabidopsis alcohol dehydrogenase gene (ADH1) by low oxygen. Genetics. 149:479–490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Grichko VP, Glick BR (2001) Ethylene and flooding stress in plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 39: 1–9. 10.1016/S0981-9428(00)01213-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Suge H, Kusanagi T (1975) Ethylene and carbon dioxide: regulation of growth in two perennial aquatic plants, arrowhead and pondweed. Plant and Cell Physiol. 16: 65–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Jackson MB (2008) Ethylene-promoted Elongation: an Adaptation to Submergence Stress. Ann. Bot. 101: 229–248. 10.1093/aob/mcm237 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Suge H, Kusanagi T (1975) Ethylene and carbon dioxide: regulation of growth in two perennial aquatic plants, arrowhead and pondweed. Plant Cell Physiol. 16, 65–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Dietz KJ, Vogel MO, Viehhauser A (2010) AP2/EREBP transcription factors are part of gene regulatory networks and integrate metabolic, hormonal and environmental signals in stress acclimation and retrograde signaling. Protoplasma. 245: 3–14. 10.1007/s00709-010-0142-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Feng JX, Liu D, Pan Y, Gong W, Ma LG, Luo JC (2005). An annotation update via cDNA sequence analysis and comprehensive profiling of developmental, hormonal or environmental responsiveness of the Arabidopsis AP2/EREBP transcription factor gene family. Plant Mol Biol. 59:853–868. 10.1007/s11103-005-1511-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Cernac A, Benning C (2004) WRINKLED1 encodes an AP2/EREB domain protein involved in the control of compound biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 40: 575–585. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02235.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Zhu Y, Cai XL, Wang ZY, Hong MM (2003) An interaction between a MYC protein and an EREBP protein is involved in transcriptional regulation of the rice Wax gene. J Biol Chem. 278:47803–47811. 10.1074/jbc.M302806200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Xu X, van Lammeren AAM, Vermeer E, Vreugdenhil D (1998) The role of gibberellin, abscisic acid, and sucrose in the regulation of potato tuber formation in vitro. Plant Physiol. 117: 575–584. 10.1104/pp.117.2.575 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Sembdner G. and Parthier B (1993) The biochemistry and the physiological and molecular actions of jasmonates. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 44: 569–589. 10.1146/annurev.pp.44.060193.003033 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Creelman RA, Mullet JE (1997) Biosynthesis and action of jasmonates in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol. 48: 355–381. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.48.1.355 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Koda Y (1992) The role ofjasmonic acid and related compounds in the regulation of plant development. Int Rev Cytol. 135:155–199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Ravnikar M, Zel J, Plaper I, Spacapan A (1993) Jasmonic acid stimulates shoot and bulb formation of garlic in vitro. J Plant Growth Regul. 12:73–77. 10.1007/BF00193236 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Debeljak N, Regvar M, Dixon KW, Sivasithamparam K (2002) Induction of tuberisation in vitro with jasmonic acid and sucrose in an Australian terrestrial orchid, Pterostylis sanguinea. Plant Growth Regul. 36: 253–260. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Lee MW, Qi M, Yang Y (2001) A novel jasmonic acid-inducible rice myb gene associates with fungal infection and host cell death. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 14:527–35. 10.1094/MPMI.2001.14.4.527 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Fernández-Calvo P, Chini A, Fernández-Barbero G, Chico JM, Gimenez-Ibanez S, Geerinck J (2011) The Arabidopsis bHLH transcription factors MYC3 and MYC4 are targets of JAZ repressors and act additively with MYC2 in the activation of jasmonate responses. Plant Cell. 3:701–15. 10.1105/tpc.110.080788 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Meng XB, Zhao WS, Lin RM, Wang M, Peng YL (2005) Identification of a novel rice bZIP-type transcription factor gene, OsbZIP1, involved in response to infection of Magnaporthe grisea. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 23: 301–302. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Zhang HW, Lu XY, Huang DF, Huang RF (2004) The ethylene-, jasmonate-, abscisic acid and NaCl-responsive tomato transcription factor JERF1 modulates expression of GCC box-containing genes and salt tolerance in tobacco. Planta. 220: 262–270. 10.1007/s00425-004-1347-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Mueller MJ (1997) Enzymes involved in jasmonic acid biosynthesis. Physiol Plant. 100: 653–663. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1997.tb03072.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Müller-Röber B, Sonnewald U, Willmitzer L (1992) Inhibition of the ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase in transgenic potatoes leads to sugar-storing tubers and influences tuber formation and expression of tuber protein genes. EMBO J. 11: 1229–1238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kuipers AGJ, Jacobsen E, Visser RGF (1994) Formation and deposition of amylose in the potato tuber starch granule are affected by the reduction of granule-bound starch synthase gene expression. Plant Cell. 6: 43–52. 10.1105/tpc.6.1.43 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Carrera E, Bou J, García-Martínez JL, Prat S (2000) Changes in GA 20-oxidase gene expression strongly affect stem length, tuber induction and tuber yield of potato plants.Plant J. 22: 247–256. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00736.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Zeevaart JAD (2008) Leaf-produced floral signals. Cur Opin Plant Biol. 11:541–547. 10.1016/j.pbi.2008.06.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Baudry A, Ito S, Song YH, Strait AA, Kiba T, Lu S (2010) F-box proteins FKF1 and LKP2 act in concert with ZEITLUPE to control arabidopsis clock progression. Plant Cell. 22: 606–622. 10.1105/tpc.109.072843 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Kim MC, Chung WS, Yun DJ, Cho MJ (2009) Calcium and calmodulin-mediated regulation of gene expression in plants. Mol Plant. 2: 13–21. 10.1093/mp/ssn091 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Hoeflich KP, Ikura M (2002) Calmodulin in action: diversity in target recognition and activation mechanisms. Cell. 108: 739–742. 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00682-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Balamani V, Veluthambi K, Poovaiah BW (1986) Effect of calcium on tuberization in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Plant Physiol. 80: 856–858. 10.1104/pp.80.4.856 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Poovaiah BW, Takezawa D, An G, Han TJ (1996) Regulated expression of a calmodulin isoform alters growth and development in potato. J Plant Physiol. 149: 553–558. 10.1016/S0176-1617(96)80333-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Bouche N, Scharlat A, Snedden W, Bouchez D, Fromm H (2002) A novel family of calmodulin-binding transcription activators in multicellular organisms. J Biol Chem. 277: 21851–21861. 10.1074/jbc.M200268200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Reddy ASN, Safadi F, Narasimhulu SB, Golovkin M, Hu X (1996) Isolation of a novel calmodulin-binding protein from Arabidopsis tha/iana. J Biol Chem. 271: 7052–7060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Fig. Developmental stages of the Chinese water chestnut, including the stolon stage, the initial stage, the middle swelling stage, and the later swelling stage.

(JPG)

S2 Fig. Sequencing saturation analysis of four libraries.

B1: stolon stage; B2: initial swelling stage; B3: middle swelling stage; B4: later swelling stage.

(JPG)

S3 Fig. GOG function classification of genes expressed during corm formation.

All genes identified in the B1/B2, B2/B3, and B3/B4 libraries were classified into 25 classifications according to their function.

(JPG)

S4 Fig. GO analysis of genes expressed during corm formation.

The percentage and number of genes involved in biological process, cellular component, and molecular function was analyzed using GO Slim Assignment.

(JPG)

S1 Table. Information on the genes expressed in the B1/B2, B2/B3, and B3/B4 libraries.

(DOC)

S2 Table. Primers for genes related to corm formation.

(XLS)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES