Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Genet. 2016 Apr 22;62(4):759–763. doi: 10.1007/s00294-016-0604-4

Phosphate responsive regulation provides insights for ESX-5 function in Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Sarah R Elliott 1, Anna D Tischler 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC5056117  NIHMSID: NIHMS792546  PMID: 27105642

Abstract

Pathogenic microbes commonly respond to environmental cues in the host by activating specialized protein secretion systems. Mycobacterium tuberculosis uses the specialized Type VII ESX protein secretion systems to transport a subset of effector proteins. The ESX-5 secretion system is involved in virulence, but both the mechanism of regulation and activating signal were unknown. Our work, reviewed here, has established that the phosphate sensing Pst/SenX3-RegX3 system directly activates ESX-5 secretion in response to phosphate limitation, a relevant environmental signal likely encountered by M. tuberculosis in the host. This review focuses on how elucidation of the ESX-5 regulatory network provides insight into its biological roles, which may include both phosphate acquisition and pathogenesis.

Keywords: ESX secretion, Type VII secretion, Pst system, RegX3


Pathogenic microorganisms often activate specialized protein secretion systems in response to host cues to promote a productive infection. Mycobacterium tuberculosis is one of the oldest and most prolific bacterial pathogens in human history, causing the disease tuberculosis. M. tuberculosis is a facultative intracellular pathogen that persists within macrophage phagosomes by deploying secreted effector proteins to counteract host defenses, including factors that inhibit fusion with lysosomes to prevent phagosome acidification (Russell 2011). M. tuberculosis uses four types of secretion pathways to transport proteins through the complex architecture of its cell envelope: the ubiquitous Sec system, the Tat export system, the accessory SecA2 system and the Type VII ESX systems (Ligon et al. 2012; van der Woude et al. 2013). There are 5 ESX systems, designated ESX-1 to ESX-5. Though the ESX systems each contain conserved core components of the secretion machinery, they appear to have evolved quite divergent functions (Stoop et al. 2012). Identifying regulatory networks that control activity of the ESX secretion systems has been a critical step towards determining their functions. The regulatory mechanism and precise function of ESX-5 were previously known. The recent discovery that a phosphate-sensing regulatory system controls ESX-5 activity has provided some insight into its potential roles in M. tuberculosis virulence.

The connection between regulation and function is clearly illustrated by the ESX-3 secretion system. ESX-3 is essential for viability of M. tuberculosis in standard in vitro culture medium (Sassetti & Rubin 2003; Serafini et al. 2009), which frustrated efforts to determine its function. The regulatory mechanisms controlling ESX-3 expression were discovered first, and provided important clues about its function. Two transcriptional regulators, IdeR and Zur, repress ESX-3 when iron or zinc, respectively, is abundant (Rodriguez et al. 2002; Maciag et al. 2007). These observations enabled characterization of ESX-3 function in iron uptake and zinc homeostasis in M. tuberculosis (Siegrist et al. 2009; Serafini et al. 2009; Serafini et al. 2013).

ESX-1 was the first of the M. tuberculosis ESX secretion systems to be discovered and has a well-established role in virulence. One virulence-associated function of ESX-1 is to permeabilize phagosomes through the secretion of effector proteins, allowing mycobacterial DNA to enter the host cell cytosol (Manzanillo et al. 2012). Given its important role in M. tuberculosis pathogenesis, the regulation of ESX-1 has also been intensively investigated. Most ESX-1 regulators act the transcriptional level. EspR controls ESX-1 secretion through transcriptional regulation of the espACD operon, which encodes several proteins that promote secretion of the canonical ESX-1 substrates EsxA (ESAT-6) and EsxB (CFP-10) (Chen et al. 2012; Fortune et al. 2005; Millington et al. 2011; MacGurn et al. 2005; Raghavan et al. 2008). ESX-1 is also regulated by a pair of two-component systems; MprAB represses the espACD operon (Pang et al. 2013) while PhoPR positively regulates transcription of many genes in the esx-1 locus (Gonzalo-Asensio et al. 2008). Several factors activate MprAB, including cell envelope stress and nutrient starvation (Betts et al. 2002; He et al. 2006; Pang et al. 2007), while PhoPR is activated by acidic pH (Baker et al. 2014). The acidic pH signal that activates PhoPR to promote esx-1 gene expression is encountered by M. tuberculosis within the phagosomal environment. This provides a clear example of a niche-specific bacterial response, based on a relevant host signal, which enables the bacterium to counter host defenses.

The function of ESX-5, found only the slow-growing mycobacteria, which include most pathogenic species, remains poorly characterized. As for the ESX-3 system, several components of ESX-5 are essential for viability of M. tuberculosis in vitro (Bottai et al. 2012; Di Luca et al. 2012). However, disrupting secretion of ESX-5 substrates results in attenuation in vivo, suggesting a significant role for ESX-5 in M. tuberculosis pathogenesis mediated by secretion of its effector proteins (Bottai et al. 2012). In the closely related pathogenic species M. marinum, most PE and PPE proteins are transported through ESX-5 (Abdallah et al. 2009), and there is evidence that the M. tuberculosis ESX-5 also secretes many of these proteins (Sayes et al. 2012). PE and PPE are classes of proteins unique to mycobacteria, and are so named for the characteristic N-terminal proline-glutamic acid (PE) or proline-proline-glutamic acid (PPE) domains (Cole et al. 1998). PE and PPE proteins, which can be either cell-associated or freely secreted, play a diverse array of roles, some of which have been linked to M. tuberculosis virulence (Sampson 2011; Fishbein et al. 2015). Deletion of a subset of pe and ppe genes encoded within the M. tuberculosis esx-5 locus causes attenuation in both macrophages and mice (Sayes et al. 2012; Bottai et al. 2012). Other PE and PPE proteins have been implicated in counteracting host defenses or modulating immune responses. PPE2 is thought to inhibit nitric oxide production in activated macrophages (Bhat et al. 2013). PPE18 binds TLR-2 on macrophages, leading to downregulation of protective Th1 proinflammatory cytokines and skewing the host towards the less effective Th2 response (Bhat et al. 2012; Nair et al. 2011; Nair et al. 2009). Finally, PE and PPE proteins are highly antigenic, inducing T-cell immunogenicity in vivo (Sayes et al. 2012). Though the precise repertoire of ESX-5-secreted PE and PPE proteins remains to be determined, given their immunogenic nature and external localization, ESX-5 substrates seem well positioned to have substantial interaction with the host during infection. Knowledge of ESX-5 regulation may lead to further discoveries concerning its precise function in M tuberculosis physiology and pathogenesis.

In a recent publication, we not only uncovered a mechanism of ESX-5 regulation, but also identified a relevant environmental signal, phosphate limitation, that triggers ESX-5 activity (Elliott & Tischler 2016). Our lab previously demonstrated that phosphate-responsive gene regulation was mediated by the Pst/SenX3-RegX3 system in M. tuberculosis (Tischler et al. 2013). The Pst (phosphate specific transport) system transports inorganic phosphate across the inner membrane, and is induced when extracellular phosphate is scarce (Vanzembergh et al. 2010). The Pst system also plays a role in gene regulation through interaction with a two-component signal transduction system (Lamarche et al. 2008). The relevant system in M. tuberculosis is SenX3-RegX3, a membrane bound sensor kinase and a DNA-binding response regulator, respectively (Tischler et al. 2013). SenX3-RegX3 is activated by phosphate limitation, and is inhibited by the Pst system when phosphate is abundant. Our work has established that deletion of pstA1, a transmembrane component of the Pst system, results in constitutive activation of RegX3, regardless of phosphate abundance (Tischler et al. 2013). Disruption of regulation mediated by Pst/SenX3-RegX3 at any level causes attenuation of M. tuberculosis in vivo, highlighting the importance of phosphate sensing for the survival of the bacterium (Parish et al. 2003; Tischler et al. 2013).

In our most recent work, we provide evidence that the phosphate responsive Pst/SenX3-RegX3 system directly regulates ESX-5 at the transcriptional level. We found that disruption of the Pst system, through deletion of pstA1, resulted in significant upregulation of esx-5 transcripts, along with increased production of ESX-5 core components and hypersecretion of known ESX-5 substrates (Elliott & Tischler 2016). We established that the changes in esx-5 gene expression and secretion system activity seen in the ΔpstA1 mutant required RegX3. We further demonstrated that ESX-5 secretion is induced by phosphate limitation. We observed overexpression of esx-5 transcripts and overproduction and hypersecretion of ESX-5 substrates when M. tuberculosis was grown in medium with limiting phosphate. The induction of ESX-5 activity during phosphate limitation also required RegX3 (Elliott & Tischler 2016). Using electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA), we demonstrated that RegX3 binds to a segment of DNA within the esx-5 locus, suggesting that RegX3 directly activates ESX-5 secretion at the transcriptional level in response to phosphate starvation (Elliott & Tischler 2016). Our work is the first to show a direct link between the Pst/SenX3-RegX3 and ESX-5 systems. Further work will more fully define the RegX3 binding site and characterize the importance of ESX-5 regulation during infection.

Throughout our experiments investigating ESX-5 regulation, we also monitored secretion of the ESX-1 substrate EsxB as a control to assess the effect of our experimental conditions on other secretion systems. To our surprise, EsxB was also hypersecreted in response to phosphate limitation through a RegX3-independent mechanism (Elliott & Tischler 2016). We observed no significant increase in esxB transcript abundance under phosphate starvation, suggesting induction of EsxB secretion occurs post-transcriptionally (Elliott & Tischler 2016). Hypersecretion of EsxB during phosphate scarcity may occur at the level of secretion or release of the protein. In M. marinum, and possibly M. tuberculosis, EsxB is found at the cell surface, and can mediate its virulence functions from this location (Kennedy et al. 2014). EsxB is also readily detected in the culture filtrate in vitro, though it is unclear whether release of the protein from the cell surface is passive or active. Perhaps phosphate limitation is one signal that actively triggers release of EsxB from the cell membrane. Nevertheless, our results suggest an additional unknown phosphate sensing mechanism, independent of RegX3, that activates EsxB secretion or release when phosphate is limited, which adds another layer of complexity to the regulation of ESX-1 secretion.

Phosphate limitation is a relevant environmental signal likely encountered by many microbial pathogens during infection (Lamarche et al. 2008; Yadav et al. 2015). For M. tuberculosis, the ability to sense and respond to starvation for this nutrient is critical to the success of the organism (Parish et al. 2003; Tischler et al. 2013;). There is evidence that M. tuberculosis is faced with phosphate limitation in vivo. Deletion of the gene encoding the phosphate binding component of the Pst system, which is predicted to impair phosphate uptake, results in a severe replication defect in vivo (Peirs et al. 2005). Moreover, the entire operon encoding the Pst system is required for survival in macrophages (Rengarajan et al. 2005). Future work in our lab will seek to pinpoint when and where M. tuberculosis encounters phosphate starvation using macrophage and murine infection models.

Regulation of ESX-5 secretion in response to phosphate limitation may be a critical function of the Pst/SenX3-RegX3 system for M. tuberculosis virulence. Both ΔregX3 and ΔpstA1 mutants are attenuated in vivo (Parish et al. 2003; Tischler et al. 2013). Deletion of regX3 may cause attenuation due to an inability to up-regulate ESX-5 secretion when the bacteria encounter phosphate-limiting conditions. Conversely, the ΔpstA1 mutant, in which RegX3 is constitutively activated, could be attenuated due to inappropriate constitutive hyper-secretion of ESX-5 substrates, some of which are highly antigenic (Sayes et al. 2012). Precise regulation of ESX-5 secretion in response to environmental signals, including phosphate, may be essential for M. tuberculosis to evade the host adaptive immune response to these antigens.

As previously discussed, several components of the ESX-5 core complex are essential for viability of M. tuberculosis in vitro. However, the essentiality of ESX-5 can be reversed by increasing the permeability of the outer membrane, by either introducing a porin or altering the lipid profile (Ates et al. 2015). This suggests that ESX-5 is essential for the secretion of proteins involved in nutrient uptake. This is an intriguing possibility, given that the ESX-3 system also functions in nutrient acquisition. Since ESX-5 secretion is induced in response to phosphate limitation, ESX-5-secreted proteins may mediate uptake of nutrients containing phosphate. The ESX-1 secreted substrate EspB adopts a fold that is similar to a previously characterized PE and PPE protein pair, which leads to oligomerization and formation of a heptameric complex with a pore at the center (Solomonson et al. 2015). Perhaps some ESX-5 associated PE and PPE proteins form similar oligomeric complexes that enable nutrient acquisition during phosphate limitation by forming pores in the outer membrane.

In addition to its role in nutrient uptake, ESX-5 may also play a more direct role in M. tuberculosis pathogenesis. There is precedence for multiple independent functions mediated by one ESX system. The ESX-3 system secretes substrates that have separable functions in iron acquisition and virulence independent of iron (Tufariello et al. 2016). We speculate that some ESX-5 substrates are also involved in the virulence of M. tuberculosis by modulating the host response. An as yet unknown ESX-5 secreted substrate(s) manipulates infected macrophages to undergo necrotic cell death, a function that seems unlikely to be related to nutrient uptake (Abdallah et al. 2011). Perhaps phosphate limitation is a signal that M. tuberculosis encounters in a particular host environment, like a phagosome, and ESX-5 effector proteins are deployed to promote survival in that niche. Current evidence certainly leaves open the possibility that ESX-5 substrates have multiple independent functions.

Our work has identified phosphate starvation as a novel environmental signal that activates ESX-5 secretion, demonstrated that this signal is communicated by the Pst/SenX3-RegX3 system, and revealed that this signal also leads to hyper-secretion of the ESX-1 substrate EsxB. These discoveries have provided hints toward a potential function of ESX-5 in phosphate acquisition and suggest that phosphate starvation is a nutritional cue that M. tuberculosis encounters in the host. Further work will be required to tease apart the potential nutrient uptake and virulence functions of ESX-5 by identifying ESX-5 effector proteins involved in these processes and to establish when and where M. tuberculosis encounters environments with limited phosphate during infection. Additional studies will also be necessary to determine the mechanism regulating secretion or release of the ESX-1 substrate EsxB in response to phosphate availability. We expect that further investigation of ESX effector proteins and the regulation of their secretion will greatly enhance our understanding of the interplay between the host and pathogen, and perhaps reveal new therapeutic targets.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by institutional start-up funds from the University of Minnesota (ADT).

References

  1. Abdallah AM, Bestebroer J, Savage NDL, de Punder K, van Zon M, Wilson L, Korbee CJ, van der Sar AM, Ottenhoff THM, van der Wel NN, Bitter W, Peters PJ. Mycobacterial secretion systems ESX-1 and ESX-5 play distinct roles in host cell death and inflammasome activation. J Immunol. 2011;187:4744–53. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1101457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abdallah AM, Verboom T, Weerdenburg EM, Gey van Pittius NC, Mahasha PW, Jimenez C, Parra M, Cadieux N, Brennan MJ, Appelmelk BJ, Bitter W. PPE and PE_PGRS proteins of Mycobacterium marinum are transported via the type VII secretion system ESX-5. Mol Microbiol. 2009;73:329–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06783.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ates LS, Ummels R, Commandeur S, van der Weerd R, Sparrius M, Weerdenberg E, Alber M, Kalscheuer R, Piersma SR, Abdallah AM, El Ghany MA, Abdel-Haleem AM, Pain A, Jimenez CR, Bitter W, Houben ENG. Essential role of the ESX-5 secretion system in outer membrane permeability of pathogenic mycobacteria. PloS Genet. 2015;11:1–30. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker JJ, Johnson BK, Abramovitch RB. Slow growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis at acidic pH is regulated by phoPR and host-associated carbon sources. Mol Microbiol. 2014;94:56–69. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Betts JC, Lukey PT, Robb LC, McAdam RA, Duncan K. Evaluation of a nutrient starvation model of Mycobacterium tuberculosis persistence by gene and protein expression profiling. Mol Microbiol. 2002;43:717–731. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02779.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bhat KH, Das A, Srikantam A, Mukhopadhyay S. PPE2 protein of Mycobacterium tuberculosis may inhibit nitric oxide in activated macrophages. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2013;1283:97–101. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bhat KH, Ahmed A, Kumar S, Sharma P, Mukhopadhyay S. Role of PPE18 protein in intracellular survival and pathogenicity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in mice. PloS One. 2012;7:e52601. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bottai D, Di Luca M, Majlessi L, Frigui W, Simeone R, Sayes F, Bitter W, Brennan MJ, Leclerc C, Batoni G, Campa M, Brosch R, Esin S. Disruption of the ESX-5 system of Mycobacterium tuberculosis causes loss of PPE protein secretion, reduction of cell wall integrity and strong attenuation. Mol Microbiol. 2012;83:1195–209. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08001.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen JM, Boy-Rottger S, Dhar N, Sweeney N, Buxton RS, Pojer F, Rosenkrands I, Cole ST. EspD is critical for the virulence-mediating ESX-1 secretion system in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Bacteriol. 2012;194:884–893. doi: 10.1128/JB.06417-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cole ST, Brosch R, Parkhill J, et al. Decipthering the biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the complete genome sequence. Nature. 1998;396:651–653. doi: 10.1038/31159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Di Luca M, Bottai D, Batoni G, Orgeur M, Aulicino A, Counoupas C, Campa M, Brosch R, Esin S. The ESX-5 associated eccB-EccC locus is essential for Mycobacterium tuberculosis viability. PloS One. 2012;7:e52059. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Elliott SR, Tischler AD. Phosphate starvation: a novel signal that triggers ESX-5 secretion in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mol Microbiol. 2016 doi: 10.1111/mmi.13332. in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fishbein S, van Wyk N, Warren RM, Sampson SL. Phylogeny to function: PE/PPE protein evolution and impact on Mycobacterium tuberculosis pathogenicity. Mol Microbiol. 2015;96:901–916. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fortune SM, Jaeger A, Sarracino DA, Chase MR, Sassetti CM, Sherman DR, Bloom BR, Rubin EJ. Mutually dependent secretion of proteins required for mycobacterial virulence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:10676–81. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504922102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gonzalo-Asensio J, Mostowy S, Harders-Westerveen J, Huygen K, Hernandez-Pando R, Thole J, Behr M, Gicquel B, Martin C. PhoP: a missing piece in the intricate puzzle of Mycobacterium tuberculosis virulence. PloS One. 2008;3:e3496. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. He H, Hovey R, Kane J, Singh V, Zahrt TC. MprAB is a stress-responsive two-component system that directly regulates expression of sigma factors SigB and SigE in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Bacteriol. 2006;188:2134–2143. doi: 10.1128/JB.188.6.2134-2143.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kennedy GM, Hooley GC, Champion MM, Medie FM, Champion PAD. A novel ESX-1 locus reveals that surface-associated ESX-1 substrates mediate virulence in Mycobacterium marinum. J Bacteriol. 2014;196:1877–1888. doi: 10.1128/JB.01502-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lamarche MG, Wanner BL, Crepin S, Harel J. The phosphate regulon and bacterial virulence: a regulatory network connecting phosphate homeostasis and pathogenesis. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2008;32:461–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00101.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ligon LS, Hayden JD, Braunstein M. The ins and outs of Mycobacterium tuberculosis protein export. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2012;92:121–132. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2011.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. MacGurn JA, Raghavan S, Stanley SA, Cox JS. A non-RD1 gene cluster is required for Snm secretion in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mol Microbiol. 2005;57:1653–1663. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04800.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Maciag A, Dainese E, Rodriguez GM, Milano A, Provvedi R, Pasca MR, Smith I, Palu G, Riccardi G, Manganelli R. Global analysis of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Zur (FurB) regulon. J Bacteriol. 2007;189:730–40. doi: 10.1128/JB.01190-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Manzanillo PS, Shiloh MU, Portnoy DA, Cox JS. Mycobacterium tuberculosis activates the DNA-dependent cytosolic surveillance pathway within macrophages. Cell Host Microbe. 2012;11:469–80. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.03.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Millington KA, Fortune SM, Low J, Garces A, Hingley-Wilson SM, Wickremasinghe M, Kon OM, Lalvani A. Rv3615c is a highly immunodominant RD1 (Region of Difference 1)-dependent secreted antigen specific for Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:5730–5735. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1015153108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Nair S, Ramaswamy PA, Ghosh S, Joshi DC, Pathak N, Siddiqui I, Sharma P, Hasnain SE, Mande SC, Mukhopadhyay S. The PPE18 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis interacts with TLR2 and activates IL-10 induction in macrophage. J Immunol. 2009;183:6269–6281. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Nair S, Pandey AD, Mukhopadhyay S. The PPE18 protein of Mycobacterium tuberculosis inhibits NF-κB/rel–mediated proinflammatory cytokine production by upregulating and phosphorylating suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 protein. J Immunol. 2011;186:5413–5424. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Pang X, Vu P, Byrd TF, Ghanny S, Soteropoulos P, Mukamolova GV, Wu S, Samten B, Howard ST. Evidence for complex interactions of stress-associated regulons in an mprAB deletion mutant of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Microbiol. 2007;153:1229–42. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.29281-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Pang X, Samten B, Cao G, Wang X, Tvinnereim AR, Chen XL, Howard ST. MprAB regulates the espA operon in Mycobacterium tuberculosis and modulates ESX-1 function and host cytokine response. J Bacteriol. 2013;195:66–75. doi: 10.1128/JB.01067-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Parish T, Smith DA, Roberts G, Betts J, Stoker NG. The senX3-regX3 two-component regulatory system of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is required for virulence. Microbiol. 2003;149:1423–1435. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.26245-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Peirs P, Lefevre P, Boarbi S, Wang XM, Denis O, Braibant M, Pethe K, Locht C, Huygen K, Content J. Mycobacterium tuberculosis with disruption in genes encoding the phosphate binding proteins PstS1 and PstS2 is deficient in phosphate uptake and demonstrates reduced in vivo virulence. Infect Immun. 2005;73:1898–1902. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.3.1898-1902.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Raghavan S, Manzanillo P, Chan K, Dovey C, Cox JS. Secreted transcription factor controls Mycobacterium tuberculosis virulence. Nature. 2008;454:717–21. doi: 10.1038/nature07219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Rengarajan J, Bloom BR, Rubin EJ. Genome-wide requirements for Mycobacterium tuberculosis adaptation and survival in macrophages. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:8327–32. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0503272102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rodriguez GM, Voskuil MI, Gold B, Schoolnik GK, Smith I. ideR, an essential gene in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: role of IdeR in iron-dependent gene expression, iron metabolism, and oxidative stress response. Infect Immun. 2002;70:3371–3381. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.7.3371-3381.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Russell DG. Mycobacterium tuberculosis and the intimate discourse of a chronic infection. Immunol Rev. 2011;240:252–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2010.00984.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sampson SL. Mycobacterial PE/PPE proteins at the host-pathogen interface. Clin Dev Immunol. 2011;2011:497203. doi: 10.1155/2011/497203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sassetti CM, Rubin EJ. Genetic requirements for mycobacterial survival during infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:12989–94. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2134250100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Sayes F, Sun L, Di Luca M, Simeone R, Degaiffier N, Fiette L, Esin S, Brosch R, Bottai D, Leclerc C, Majlessi L. Strong immunogenicity and cross-reactivity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis ESX-5 type VII secretion: encoded PE-PPE proteins predicts vaccine potential. Cell Host Microbe. 2012;11:352–63. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Serafini A, Boldrin F, Palu G, Manganelli R. Characterization of a Mycobacterium tuberculosis ESX-3 conditional mutant: essentiality and rescue by iron and zinc. J Bacteriol. 2009;191:6340–6344. doi: 10.1128/JB.00756-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Serafini A, Pisu D, Palu G, Rodriguez GM, Manganelli R. The ESX-3 secretion system is necessary for iron and zinc homeostasis in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e78351. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Siegrist MS, Unnikrishnan M, McConnell MJ, Borowsky M, Cheng TY, Siddiqi N, Fortune SM, Moody DB, Rubin EJ. Mycobacterial Esx-3 is required for mycobactin-mediated iron acquisition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:18792–18797. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900589106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Solomonson M, Setiaputra D, Makepeace KAT, Lameignere E, Petrochenko EV, Conrady DG, Bergeron JR, Vuckovic M, DiMaio F, Borchers CH, Yip CK, Strynadka NCJ. Structure of EspB from the ESX-1 type VII secretion system and insights into its export mechanism. Structure. 2015;23:571–83. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2015.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Stoop EJM, Bitter W, van der Sar AM. Tubercle bacilli rely on a type VII army for pathogenicity. Trends Microbiol. 2012;20:477–84. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2012.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Tischler AD, Leistikow RL, Kirksey MA, Voskuil MI, McKinney JD. Mycobacterium tuberculosis requires phosphate-responsive gene regulation to resist host immunity. Infect Immun. 2013;81:317–28. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01136-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Tufariello JM, Chapman JR, Kerantzas CA, Wong KW, Vilcheze C, Jones CM, Cole LE, Tinaztepe E, Thompson V, Fenyo D, Niederweis M, Ueberheide B, Philips JA, Jacobs WR., Jr Separable roles for Mycobacterium tuberculosis ESX-3 effectors in iron acquisition and virulence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:348–57. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1523321113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Vanzembergh F, Peirs P, Lefevre P, Celio N, Mathys V, Content J, Kalai M. Effect of PstS sub-units or PknD deficiency on the survival of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2010;90:338–45. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. van der Woude AD, Luirink J, Bitter W. Getting across the cell envelope : mycobacterial protein secretion. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2013;374:109–134. doi: 10.1007/82_2012_298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Yadav KK, Singh N, Rajasekharan R. Responses to phosphate deprivation in yeast cells. Curr Genet. 2015 doi: 10.1007/s00294-015-0544-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES