Skip to main content
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 1996 Sep;80(9):831–834. doi: 10.1136/bjo.80.9.831

Functional imaging of the retina using the multifocal electroretinograph: a control study.

S Parks 1, D Keating 1, T H Williamson 1, A L Evans 1, A T Elliott 1, J L Jay 1
PMCID: PMC505622  PMID: 8942382

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A new technique exists that enables functional mapping of the retina. A control population was examined to obtain normative values and to assess the reproducibility of this new test. METHODS: Twenty healthy volunteers were tested using a 61 hexagonal array stimulus with a 14 minute recording period. Median 5th and 95th percentiles were determined for implicit times and amplitude measures for the 61 test areas. Repeat measurements were performed on 10 individuals. Wilcoxon and Bland and Altman techniques were used to quantify reproducibility of the test. RESULTS: The implicit time of the wave-form components was not found to vary over the retina (peak or b-wave component, 35.52 (1.4) ms; trough or a-wave component, 17.76 (0.8) ms). Reproducibility was found to decrease with eccentricity (coefficient of repeatability 17.4% for the central area increasing to 30.3% for the peripheral ring). CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that reproducibility, although variable with eccentricity, is comparable with conventional electrophysiology. These limits of variation were used to assign confidence intervals to individual retinal areas and will be used (future work) in the examination of diseased states.

Full text

PDF
831

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bland J. M., Altman D. G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307–310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Curcio C. A., Sloan K. R., Kalina R. E., Hendrickson A. E. Human photoreceptor topography. J Comp Neurol. 1990 Feb 22;292(4):497–523. doi: 10.1002/cne.902920402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hawlina M., Konec B. New noncorneal HK-loop electrode for clinical electroretinography. Doc Ophthalmol. 1992;81(2):253–259. doi: 10.1007/BF00156014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jacobi P. C., Miliczek K. D., Zrenner E. Experiences with the international standard for clinical electroretinography: normative values for clinical practice, interindividual and intraindividual variations and possible extensions. Doc Ophthalmol. 1993;85(2):95–114. doi: 10.1007/BF01371126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sandberg M. A., Ariel M. A hand-held, two-channel stimulator-ophthalmoscope. Arch Ophthalmol. 1977 Oct;95(10):1881–1882. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1977.04450100183025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sutter E. E., Tran D. The field topography of ERG components in man--I. The photopic luminance response. Vision Res. 1992 Mar;32(3):433–446. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(92)90235-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES