Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 1996 Oct;80(10):890–894. doi: 10.1136/bjo.80.10.890

Penetrating keratoplasty in Africa: graft survival and visual outcome.

D Yorston 1, M Wood 1, A Foster 1
PMCID: PMC505643  PMID: 8976699

Abstract

AIM: To study the survival and visual outcome of penetrating keratoplasty in an African setting. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 216 corneal grafts, performed on 203 eyes of 186 patients, at Kikuyu Hospital, Kenya over a 5 year period. RESULTS: Half of the transplants were carried out for keratoconus with only 5% of the grafts being undertaken for corneal scarring caused by trachoma or measles. The average follow up was 27.3 months. The probability of graft survival at 2 years was 87.4% (95% CI 80.6%-94.3%) for keratoconus and 64.7% (95% CI 54.8%-74.6%) for other corneal pathologies. Forty seven grafts (21.8%) in 36 patients (17.7%) are known to have become opaque. The commonest causes of graft opacification were bacterial keratitis (6.0%), endothelial failure (6.0%), and graft rejection (5.1%). Preoperatively 55% of keratoconus eyes and 75.7% of non-keratoconus eyes were blind. Postoperatively, 5% of keratoconus eyes and 41.7% of the non-keratoconus eyes were blind. Normal vision was achieved in 53.7% of operated eyes. Grafts carried out for keratoconus had a better visual outcome than grafts performed for other corneal pathologies. Preoperatively, 12.4% of keratoconus and 48.5% of non-keratoconus patients were blind in their better eye. Postoperatively, 1.1% of keratoconus patients and 25.7% of non-keratoconus patients were blind. The number of patients with normal vision in the better eye increased from 32 (17.2%) to 106 (57.0%). Sight was restored to 34 blind patients, but two patients with severe visual impairment preoperatively were blind at their last follow up. There was therefore a net reduction of 32 in the number of blind patients after 216 keratoplasties. CONCLUSIONS: Penetrating keratoplasty can be successful in Africa, particularly for keratoconus and other corneal dystrophies. However, penetrating keratoplasty has a limited role in the treatment of blindness from corneal scarring due to trachoma, measles, and vitamin A deficiency for which community based preventive measures must remain the priority.

Full text

PDF
890

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bates A. K., Kirkness C. M., Ficker L. A., Steele A. D., Rice N. S. Microbial keratitis after penetrating keratoplasty. Eye (Lond) 1990;4(Pt 1):74–78. doi: 10.1038/eye.1990.8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Faal H., Minassian D., Sowa S., Foster A. National survey of blindness and low vision in The Gambia: results. Br J Ophthalmol. 1989 Feb;73(2):82–87. doi: 10.1136/bjo.73.2.82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Foster A., Gilbert C. Community efforts in the reduction of corneal blindness in developing countries. Refract Corneal Surg. 1991 Nov-Dec;7(6):445–448. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Foster A., Yorston D. Corneal ulceration in Tanzanian children: relationship between measles and vitamin A deficiency. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1992 Jul-Aug;86(4):454–455. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(92)90268-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Holland S. How do we restore and maintain a clear cornea in a poor rural villager? Penetrating keratoplasty in developing countries and international eye banking. Refract Corneal Surg. 1991 Nov-Dec;7(6):417–418. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kirkness C. M., Ezra E., Rice N. S., Steele A. D. The success and survival of repeat corneal grafts. Eye (Lond) 1990;4(Pt 1):58–64. doi: 10.1038/eye.1990.6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kirkness C. M., Ficker L. A., Steele A. D., Rice N. S. The success of penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. Eye (Lond) 1990;4(Pt 5):673–688. doi: 10.1038/eye.1990.95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Paglen P. G., Fine M., Abbott R. L., Webster R. G., Jr The prognosis for keratoplasty in keratoconus. Ophthalmology. 1982 Jun;89(6):651–654. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(82)34753-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sharif K. W., Casey T. A. Changing indications for penetrating keratoplasty, 1971-1990. Eye (Lond) 1993;7(Pt 4):485–488. doi: 10.1038/eye.1993.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Taylor H. R., West S. K., Mmbaga B. B., Katala S. J., Turner V., Lynch M., Muñoz B., Rapoza P. A. Hygiene factors and increased risk of trachoma in central Tanzania. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989 Dec;107(12):1821–1825. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1989.01070020903037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Vail A., Gore S. M., Bradley B. A., Easty D. L., Rogers C. A. Corneal graft survival and visual outcome. A multicenter Study. Corneal Transplant Follow-up Study Collaborators. Ophthalmology. 1994 Jan;101(1):120–127. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(94)31376-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Williams K. A., Ash J. K., Pararajasegaram P., Harris S., Coster D. J. Long-term outcome after corneal transplantation. Visual result and patient perception of success. Ophthalmology. 1991 May;98(5):651–657. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(91)32238-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Yorston D., Foster A. Herpetic keratitis in Tanzania: association with malaria. Br J Ophthalmol. 1992 Oct;76(10):582–585. doi: 10.1136/bjo.76.10.582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES