Abstract
Hematopoietic progenitor cell replacement therapy remains a surprisingly unrefined process. In general, unmanipulated bone marrow or mobilized peripheral blood grafts which carry potentially harmful passenger cells are administered after treating recipients with high-dose chemo- and/or radiotherapy to eradicate malignant disease, eliminate immunologic barriers to allogeneic cell engraftment, and to “make space” for rare donor stem cells within the stem cell niche. The sequalae of such treatments are substantial, including direct organ toxicity and non-specific inflammation that contributes to the development of graft-versus-host disease and poor immune reconstitution. Passenger tumor cells that contaminate autologous hematopoietic grafts may contribute to relapse post-transplant. Use of antibodies to rid grafts of unwanted cell populations, and to eliminate or minimize the need for non-specifically cytotoxic therapies used to condition transplant recipients, will dramatically improve the safety profile of allogeneic and gene-modified autologous hematopoietic stem cell therapies.
Introduction
The fundamental goal of hematopoietic cell (HCT) and stem cell (HSCT) transplantation — both autologous and allogeneic — is to replace defective, malignant, or chemotherapy-damaged stem cells. For most patients undergoing this type of stem cell replacement therapy, recipient conditioning has traditionally involved high doses of cytotoxic and/or immunosuppressive chemotherapy, with or without adjunctive radiation to all or part of the body. Hematopoietic rescue or cell replacement is currently achieved by infusion of unmanipulated hematopoietic cell products carrying passenger cells with the potential to cause harm to the recipient. Given the diversity of conditions that are treated with HCT/HSCT, a uniform approach to conditioning is neither practical nor desirable. Rather, a balance between targeted disease eradication, graft manipulation, and immunosuppression tailored to individual malignant and non-malignant indications for HSC transplantation will prevail.
The primary directive of autologous HCT/HSCT is to regenerate stem cell reservoirs damaged by a malignancy such as lymphoma or myeloma or by the chemotherapy used to treat these conditions. In this setting, the use of antibodies during conditioning may primarily be focused on improving disease control or decreasing regimen toxicity. In the case of lymphoma, a monoclonal antibody (mAb) has also been used to purge autografts of lymphoma progenitors [1]. Since the advent of clinical antibody therapy with OKT3, an immunosuppressant murine anti-human CD3ε mAb [2], and the widespread use of Rituximab, a mouse/human chimeric mAb directed at the human CD20 antigen expressed on B lineage lymphomas and leukemias [3], therapeutically useful antibodies to targets in several other malignancies have been developed [4**]. These agents may be employed to eradicate malignant cells in patients receiving autologous transplants; however, it is critically important to develop a strategy that ensures passenger tumor cells are not reinfused with the HCT product.
Antibody selection using technologies to sort purified HSC by immunomagnetic beads and/or fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) are alternative and perhaps preferable methods for providing autologous HSC grafts free of contaminating tumor cells. This approach is relevant to several malignant diseases treatable with myeloablative chemotherapy and rescue with autologous HCT, including lymphomas, multiple myeloma, germ cell tumors and carcinomas. Administration of antibody-purified, cancer depleted HSC grafts may prevent the reinfusion of circulating tumor cells.
When malignant or immunogenetically defective stem cells and hematopoietic populations are targeted for replacement by allogeneic HCT, the requirements of the conditioning regimen are more substantial. Lethality to endogenous stem cells is required, but, in addition, sufficient immunosuppression must be achieved to prevent host-versus-graft (HVG) mediated immunologic graft rejection [5*]. Furthermore, ongoing immunosuppression is required post-transplant to attenuate graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) caused by donor T cells in unmanipulated HCT grafts [6].
Here we provide a discussion about use of mAbs for: 1) improving conditioning regimens by facilitating host stem cell depletion, thus removing physical barriers to engraftment into the stem cell niche, 2) facilitating HSC graft purification, and 3) enhancing immunosuppression to enable engraftment of stem cells across histocompatibility barriers.
Conditioning strategies: Radioimmunoconjugates
Antibodies conjugated with radionuclides have been shown to effectively deliver radiotoxicity to tumors. This technology is adaptable to use in radiation-mediated myeloablation of bone marrow stem and progenitor cells. To date, most approaches have utilized non-HSC-specific targets that are present in the bone marrow, such as CD45, a pan-leukocyte antigen. When antibody-bound radionuclides concentrate in the marrow due to affinity to such targets, the HSC are subjected to genotoxic radiation either by virtue of the fact that they also express the antigen, or via a bystander effect (so-called “cross-fire effect”), in which case HSC are physically situated in close proximity to other cells with the cognate antigen to which the antibody binds [7,8*]. The rationale for intensifying radiotoxicity to the marrow with this strategy is based upon experience using total body irradiation (TBI) to condition patients for allotransplantation. Increasing the dose of TBI reduced relapse and ensured achievement of full donor chimerism (ie, higher level and longer lasting multi-lineage donor engraftment), but escalating doses are associated with increased regimen-related mortality and GVHD [9,10]. Radioimmunoconjugates enable the delivery of higher radiation exposures specifically to hematopoietic tissues, thus sparing exposure to other critical organs.
The safety of 131I-labelled monoclonal antibodies to CD45 was originally demonstrated in mice [7], non-human primates [11], and then humans [8,12], by investigators at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center. This approach has since been adapted to clinical use by other investigative groups. Other non-HSC-specific antigens which have been targeted include CD33 [13–15] and CD66 [16]. Original studies of this approach utilized monoclonal antibodies conjugated with beta particle emitters such as 131I [12,17], 188Re [16], and 90Y [18]. These radionuclides are not entirely suited to this application due to deep tissue penetration of beta particles, which may be associated with undesirable toxicities. As an alternative, alpha emitters such as 213Bi [19,20–21] and 211At [19,22], which have tissue penetration path lengths of 40 to 90 μm, are being investigated to limit off-site toxicities and increase the therapeutic index of these treatments [23*]. Nevertheless, comprehensive elimination of endogenous HSC with these short-range reagents will likely depend on targeting antigens that are present on HSC, due to decreased by-stander effect.
A further refinement of the radioimmunoconjugate approach is the development of pre-targeting strategies, in which a streptavidin conjugated antibody is administered and time is permitted for its accumulation in the target tissue (e.g., bone marrow) [23*,24]. A biotin-bound radionuclide is then administered, and because the radionuclide-bound protein is rapidly excreted in urine if it is not retained by binding to the pre-targeted antibody-streptavidin complex, off-site radiotoxicity is minimized.
Conditioning regimens: Unconjugated antibodies
As an alternative to using mAbs to deliver toxic payloads, unconjugated mAbs can be effectively applied to targeted elimination of specific cell populations. The therapeutic effects of these antibodies rely on functional characteristics of the specific immunoglobulin molecule produced by the mAb-generating hybridoma. Potential mechanisms to facilitate stem cell depletion include lysis of target cells by complement fixation, apoptosis induction by surface antigen cross-linking or growth factor deprivation, antibody-mediated cellular cytotoxicity, and antibody-dependent phagocytosis.
France and colleagues used two rat anti-human CD45 mAbs which work synergistically to fix complement and lyse cells via assembly of a membrane attack complex [25**]. Although HSC express abundant CD45, as do all hematopoietic cells in the bone marrow, treatment with these mAbs was not associated with significant depletion of marrow progenitor cells or enhancement of engraftment in syngeneic mice [26], but did show some activity in clearance of leukemic blasts from the bone marrow in humans [27]. These mAbs were recently employed in a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen for congenital immunodeficiencies, in conjunction with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and alemtuzumab (anti-CD52) [28**]. Although the regimen was well-tolerated and high-level donor chimerism was achieved, the contribution of the lytic anti-CD45 mAb treatment in the context of these other agents remains to be further clarified.
Another way mAb targeting may be used to deplete normal and malignant cells involves deprivation of protective barriers between these cells and components of the innate immune system. For instance, the cell surface protein CD47 prevents phagocytosis of migrating stem cells by providing inhibitory signals to macrophages via binding to SIRPα and is upregulated on HSC and all human leukemias [29]. When CD47:SIRPα interactions are blocked, pro-phagocytic signals mediated by another surface protein, calreticulin, predominate [30*]. Blocking mAbs to CD47 have been developed which enable phagocytosis of otherwise protected cell populations such as mobilized stem cells and malignant progenitors [31**]. Normal HSC express lower levels of calreticulin as compared to malignant cells explaining why this approach has been demonstrated to eliminate cancer stem cells in xenogeneic models of acute myelogenous leukemia [32**] acute lymphoid leukemia [33*], and several solid tumors [34**,35] while sparing normal hematopoiesis. Anti-CD47 based therapies are rapidly moving toward clinical application and may ultimately play a role in clearing stem cell niches of malignant progenitors.
Monoclonal antibodies to cell surface receptors that inhibit interactions with critical ligands represent a potentially powerful mechanism to induce specific stem cell depletion. Targeting HSC surface antigens which are linchpins to their survival or required for the maintenance of pluripotency is a goal of this research. Czechowicz and colleagues demonstrated the feasibility of using mAbs to CD117 (c-kit) that block interactions with its ligand stem cell factor (aka, kit ligand or steel factor), as an approach for facilitating host HSC depletion and donor HSC engraftment in histocompatible mouse strains [36**]. Anti-CD117, when administered to immunodeficient Rag2−/− or Rag2−/−IL2Rγc−/− mice — which are models for human severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) variants lacking B and T cells (as well as natural killer [NK] cells in the case of IL2Rγc−/−) — leads to deep depletion of long-term HSC and all downstream c-kit-expressing progeny [36**]. When adequate time is permitted for antibody catabolism, allogeneic HSC engraft at significantly higher levels in anti-CD117-treated animals than observed in unconditioned animals. We have since found a clinical-grade humanized anti-human CD117 mAb that capably depletes human HSC in a xenograft model (unpublished) and this approach will soon be evaluated as an allotransplant conditioning method in patients with SCID.
Interestingly, when used as a monotherapy, anti-CD117 mAbs do not adequately deplete endogenous HSC or facilitate allogeneic HSC engraftment in immunocompetent animals [36**]. Via mechanisms which have yet to be fully elucidated, cells not present in SCID animals, but present in immunocompetent hosts, appear to partially protect HSC from depletion in the setting of c-kit blockade. Nevertheless, Xue and colleagues demonstrated engraftment of congenic hematopoietic progenitors in immunocompetent mice treated with anti-CD117 and low dose radiation [37]. Even low dose radiation, however, has the potential to confer long-term risks, particularly in children, so it remains an important goal to develop regimens that permit anti-CD117-mediated HSC depletion without adding significant additional toxicity.
Graft preparation: Antibody-purified autologous HSC
A misnomer in the field of cellular therapy is the practice commonly called autologous “stem cell” transplantation. Autografts comprised of unmanipulated G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood (MPB) cells are routinely used to rescue hematopoiesis following high-dose chemotherapy, which as a side effect causes myeloablation. Antibody-purified HSC grafts can substantially reduce the likelihood of reinfusing circulating tumor cells in this context. Monoclonal antibody reagents may be used to either deplete tumor cells based on their expression of specific antigens, or to sort pure stem cell populations away from other cells in MPB, as is commonly practiced when HSC are enriched by CD34 expression [38–40,41*]. It is important to recognize, however, that CD34 is not expressed exclusively on HSC, and indeed some non-hematologic malignancies may be CD34+ [41*,42*], so this practice does not yet offer a satisfactory solution for purifying HSC grafts of circulating tumor cells. This fact necessitates the development of other mAb reagents of good manufacturing practice (GMP) quality to achieve better HSC purification.
CD34+CD90+ (Thy1+) selected MPB HSC sorted by FACS were evaluated for use in autografting for multiple myeloma after it was demonstrated that this phenotype excluded myeloma progenitor cells [43*]. Sorting on the additional parameter of CD90 expression eliminates roughly 50–60% of CD34+ cells in G-CSF MPB that do not have long-term engraftment capacity, and facilitates purification of HSC from malignant cells. The first study using these highly enriched HSC in myeloma treated 9 patients and demonstrated a delay in neutrophil and platelet engraftment; however, the study was not designed to identify a threshold cell dose required for adequate engraftment [44]. A contemporaneous study by another group using the same CD34+CD90+ selection method treated 23 myeloma patients with a similar conditioning regimen and observed four engraftment failures (four patients failed to recover adequate platelet counts, and three remained dependent on G-CSF to prevent neutropenia) [45*]. This study defined a minimum CD34+CD90+ HSC dose of 8x105 cells per kilogram recipient weight, above which no engraftment failures were noted and no delays to neutrophil or platelet recovery were observed [45*].
Vose and colleagues autografted 20 non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients with CD34+CD90+ HSC after high-dose chemotherapy [46]. Autograft products sorted for this phenotype were assayed for contaminating tumor cells by PCR quantification of lymphoma-specific targets, such as mutated bcl-1 or bcl-2. The sort strategy depleted circulating NHL cells by a factor of 3–5 fold. Rapid neutrophil engraftment (day 12) and platelet transfusion independence (day 12) was observed with a median CD34+CD90+ cell dose of 5x105 cells per kilogram recipient weight. No engraftment failures were observed.
CD34+CD90+ HSC were also used in a single trial of high-dose chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer [42*]. Micro-metastases to bone marrow have been reported in up to 82% of patients with stage IV breast cancer [47], substantiating a risk for reinfusion of circulating tumor cells in unmanipulated grafts in this non-hematopoietic malignancy. The CD34+CD90+ phenotypic sorting strategy eliminated circulating breast tumor cells to a level less than 0.0001%, which compared favorably with unmanipulated HCT that were often contaminated with cytokeratin positive adenocarcinoma cells [42*]. No engraftment failures or delays to neutrophil or platelet engraftment (days 10 and 14, respectively) were observed in 22 patients treated on this clinical trial. Long-term follow-up of these patients revealed a higher than expected fraction not only remained free of cancer, but maintained normal hematopoiesis and peripheral blood counts for as long as 14 years after autologous G-CSF mobilized CD34+CD90+ HSC administration [48**]. These findings verify that cells of the CD34+CD90+ phenotype rapidly rescue long-term blood formation, and that the efficacy of this approach for metastatic breast cancer and potentially other malignancies deserves further investigation in clinical trials.
Graft preparation: Purified allogeneic HSC transplantations
In the future, some indications for allogeneic transplantation will likely be supplanted by gene-modified autologous HSC replacement. Nevertheless, many malignant and non-malignant diseases will remain curable only with allogeneic transplantation, the primary toxicity of which is GVHD. Using positive selection for CD34+CD90+ cells as discussed above can reduce the T cell content of MPB grafts by 1,000,000-fold to a level at which the risk of GVHD is substantially reduced. Such antibody-purified allogeneic HSC transplants may not be a viable approach for treatment of malignancies until methods for complete eradication of all host tumor progenitor cells is achieved, thus eliminating the need for graft-versus-malignancy (GVM) effects. It is possible, however, that graft manipulation strategies, such as provision of T cells with known targets and sortable by tetramer reagents, will obviate the need to give crude T cell grafts. Co-transplantation with purified HSC and T cell subpopulations with targeted anti-tumor or anti-pathogen activity may be a useful strategy for providing stem cell replacement and rapid disease-specific functional immunity to improve outcomes. As a proof-of-concept example of this approach, Müller and colleagues recently demonstrated transplantation of mice with purified allogeneic HSC plus tetramer-selected T cells directed against murine cytomegalovirus (MCMV) [49*]. Massive expansion of functional anti-MCMV specific T cells with enhanced anti-viral immunity was observed in comparison with recipients of HSC plus unselected T cells. De novo T cell immunity arising from the donor HSC was also significantly improved [49*], indicating this strategy may lead to better qualitative immune recovery than with unmanipulated grafts that involve crude whole T cell adoptive transfer.
Combining antibody conditioning and antibody-purified allogeneic HSC grafts
The area of most immediate promise for the use of antibody purified allogeneic HSC and targeted host conditioning is in the treatment of non-malignant disease. Graft T cells are thought to both confer GVM effects as well as facilitate the engraftment of donor cells aiding in the conversion of recipients to fully donor-derived hematopoiesis. Even low amounts of adoptively transferred allogeneic T cells are associated with overt GVHD, however [39,40,50–52]. Furthermore, subclinical GVHD severely impairs immune reconstitution [53*,54*], even when destruction of non-immune tissues is not observed. Since neither GVM nor complete donor chimerism are required for effective treatment of non-malignant disease, GVHD should be avoidable without compromising the efficacy of stem cell replacement.
The multitude of non-malignant disorders curable by partial hematopoietic chimerism ranges from congenital immune deficiencies to hemoglobinopathies, lysosomal storage diseases, and other marrow failure states. In most of these conditions, low-level mixed donor chimerism (ie, 5–30%) is sufficient to correct the hematologic disorder and prevent disease-related sequalae. Another clinical scenario in which mixed donor chimerism achieved with HSCT following reduced-intensity conditioning may be useful is the induction of immune tolerance in patients undergoing solid organ transplantation. As proof of concept for this latter scenario, Scandling and colleagues recently demonstrated in a clinical study that mixed chimerism can be routinely achieved in patients undergoing combined human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched kidney and hematopoietic cell transplantation thereby permitting cessation of immune suppressive drugs with long-term kidney allograft survival [55]. Mixed chimerism and immune tolerance was achieved using conditioning with total lymphoid irradiation and anti-thymocyte globulin followed by CD34-enriched MPB hematopoietic precursors, a regimen utilizing antibody-based immunoablation with administration of antibody-enriched HSC.
Another nascent field which will likely be advanced by the availability of antibody-based conditioning and purified HSC grafts is the treatment of severe autoimmune disorders. Evidence that transplantation of purified allogeneic HSC and establishment of mixed hematopoietic chimerism can successfully inhibit autoimmune disease pathogenesis has been demonstrated in mice. Beilhack and colleagues showed that transplantation of either major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-mismatched or MHC-matched allogeneic HSC blocked development of hyperglycemia in diabetes-prone NOD mice by attenuating auto-reactive peripheral T cells responsible for pancreatic islet destruction [56,57]. Diabetes was prevented in NOD mice treated with non-marrow ablative radiation and establishment of multi-lineage mixed donor/host chimerism. In a mouse model of systemic lupus erythmatosus (SLE), Smith-Berdan and colleagues similarly showed that induction of mixed chimerism by transplantation of purified allogeneic HSC after nonmyeloablative conditioning reversed the symptoms of established disease, including proteinuric lupus nephritis, and lowered the frequency of circulating immune complexes or autoantibodies [58]. These studies support further clinical study of purified HSCT in patients with severe autoimmune disorders.
Use of antibodies to overcome allogeneic immune barriers
Although promising and technically within reach, the proposed use of purified allogeneic HSC grafts for the routine treatment of non-malignant diseases will require a paradigm shift in the practice of preparing patients for stem cell transplants. Regimen-related toxicities that may have an acceptable benefit-risk ratio and confer therapeutic effects against malignancies can be made unnecessary for non-malignant diseases if alternative approaches to permit engraftment are established. Given that the major barriers to allogeneic HSC engraftment are host immune cells (primarily T and NK cells) and resident HSC it is possible to target and eliminate these populations with antibodies.
Attempts have been made to develop T cell specific mAb reagents such as anti-TCRαβ in murine [59] and canine [60,61] HSC transplant models; however, no such reagents have yet been employed therapeutically in human trials. Rather, polyclonal antibody preparations such as anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) and non-T cell specific monoclonal antibodies such as alemtuzumab, an antibody to CD52, which leads to depletion of T, B, NK, and some myeloid cells, are increasingly being used clinically to facilitate immunosuppression of allotransplant recipients, with conflicting results regarding benefit [62–64].
Alternatively, mAb reagents targeting T cell co-stimulatory molecules are being advanced to clinical trials to facilitate development of peripheral immunologic tolerance and prevent graft rejection [65]. CTLA4-Ig, which interrupts CD28:CD80/CD86 (B7-1/B7-2)-mediated costimulation, demonstrated promising activity for development of immunologic tolerance to hematopoietic and other grafts in mice [66], but has not yet translated to use in human HSC transplantation. Antibodies to CD154 (CD40 ligand), which mediates antigen-presenting cell activation when ligated to CD40, were shown to facilitate the development of mixed chimerism in mice receiving fully MHC mismatched bone marrow grafts without other conditioning [67*]. Unfortunately, attempts to translate this clinically were halted when anti-CD154 mAbs were found to precipitate arterial and venous thromboemboli, likely due to aggregation of CD154-expressing activated platelets [68]. Combination of CTLA4-Ig, a non-depleting mAb to CD40, and sirolimus, which blocks T and B cell response to IL-2, was recently shown to facilitate development of mixed donor chimerism and immunologic tolerance in a non-human primate model of unmanipulated bone marrow transplantation, and may represent a clinically translatable approach for induction of immune tolerance to purified HSC grafts [69].
The combination of these lymphodepleting or lymphosuppressive reagents, together with antibodies that target endogenous marrow and/or HSC populations (as discussed above), will be required to overcome host resistance and allow the engraftment of purified allogeneic HSC. A similar need for deep immunosuppression of the recipient is also needed when gene-modified autologous HSC are given, since the product of the corrected gene, in most cases, represents a neo-antigen to the recipient and thus a target for HVG immune rejection [70–72].
Concluding remarks
Monoclonal antibody reagents are increasingly important in the design of clinical trials addressing methods for improving patient outcomes in autologous and allogeneic transplantation by reducing regimen-related toxicities and improving eradication of diseased or damaged hematopoietic stem cells. Immunosuppression required for engraftment of cells with minor (and, potentially, major) histocompatibility differences from the recipient will increasingly rely on targeted immune therapies. Antibody reagents will also play an increasingly critical role in the isolation and clinical separation of stem cell populations from other contaminating cells. These approaches to eradication of stem cells, malignant or otherwise, using functionally active mAbs in combination with immunodepleting mAb therapies, will enable minimally-toxic stem cell replacement with material from multiple potential sources, including gene-modified autologous cells, allogeneic stem cells, and potentially embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells.
Highlights (for review).
We discuss different methods for using monoclonal antibodies to improve conditioning regimens for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
We discuss methods for using antibodies to purify hematopoietic stem cells to remove potentially harmful passenger cells
We discuss use of antibodies to enhance immunosuppression to enhance engraftment of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells
Acknowledgments
The authors thank David Miklos and Mark Krampf for critical review of the manuscript. Related work in the authors’ labs is supported by NIH P01CA049605 (JAS), NIH P01HL075462 (JAS), NIH P01CA139490 (ILW), NIH R01HL058770 (ILW), the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine RM1-01733 (JAS), and grants from the Stinehart-Reed Foundation (JAS) and the Snyder Foundation (JAS). ACL is supported by an American Society of Hematology Research Training Award.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest
ILW co-founded SyStemix, Inc., which performed the CD34+CD90+ HSC selection in the trials discussed in this review, but currently has no financial interest in the technology as SyStemix, Inc., is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Novartis, Inc. ACL and JAS have no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References and recommended reading
- 1.Jacobsen E, Freedman A. B-cell purging in autologous stem-cell transplantation for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Lancet Oncol. 2004;5:711–717. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(04)01646-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Goldstein G. Overview of the development of Orthoclone OKT3: monoclonal antibody for therapeutic use in transplantation. Transplant Proc. 1987;19:1–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Taylor RP, Lindorfer MA. Immunotherapeutic mechanisms of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies. Curr Opin Immunol. 2008;20:444–449. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2008.05.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4**.Scott AM, Wolchok JD, Old LJ. Antibody therapy of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12:278–287. doi: 10.1038/nrc3236. This is a helpful paper that comprehensively reviews mAbs available for cancer therapy, including mechanisms of action, specific configurations, and clinical efficacy. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5*.Shizuru JA, Bhattacharya D, Cavazzana-Calvo M. The biology of allogeneic hematopoietic cell resistance. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010;16:S2–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.11.005. This paper succintly reviews the role of immune-mediated resistance to engraftment, as well as the characteristics of niche space and engraftment facilitating cell populations. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shizuru JA, Negrin RS, Weissman IL. Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells: clinical and preclinical regeneration of the hematolymphoid system. Annu Rev Med. 2005;56:509–538. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.54.101601.152334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Matthews DC, Badger CC, Fisher DR, Hui TE, Nourigat C, Appelbaum FR, Martin PJ, Bernstein ID. Selective radiation of hematolymphoid tissue delivered by anti-CD45 antibody. Cancer Res. 1992;52:1228–1234. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8*.Matthews DC, Appelbaum FR, Eary JF, Fisher DR, Durack LD, Bush SA, Hui TE, Martin PJ, Mitchell D, Press OW, et al. Development of a marrow transplant regimen for acute leukemia using targeted hematopoietic irradiation delivered by 131I-labeled anti-CD45 antibody, combined with cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation. Blood. 1995;85:1122–1131. Here, the results of a phase I study of 131I-labeled anti-CD45 demonstrated the safety of this approach, and specifically, that an antibody radioconjugate broadly targeting the hematopoietic system could be added to conventional conditioning for allotransplantation of patients with acute leukemia without incurring surplus toxicity. Radioconjugate biodistribution and mean absorbed doses in several tissues were measured, confirming concentration of the agent in bone marrow and spleen. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Clift RABC, Appelbaum FR, Bearman SI, Petersen FB, Fisher LD, Anasetti C, Beatty P, Bensinger WI, Doney K, Hill R, McDonald G, Martin P, Sanders J, Singer J, Stewart P, Sullivan KM, Witherspoon R, Storb R, Hansen J, Thomas ED. Allogeneic marrow transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first remission. A randomized trial of two irradiation regimens. Blood. 1990;76:1867. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Clift RABC, Appelbaum FR, Bryant E, Bearman SI, Petersen FB, Fisher LD, Anasetti C, Beatty P, Bensinger WI, Doney K, Hill RS, McDonald GB, Martin P, Meyers J, Sanders J, Singer J, Stewart P, Sullivan KM, Witherspoon R, Storb R, Hansen JA, Thomas ED. Allogeneic marrow transplantation in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in the chronic phase. A randomized trial of two irradiation regimens. Blood. 1991;77:1660. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Matthews DC, Appelbaum FR, Eary JF, Hui TE, Fisher DR, Martin PJ, Durack LD, Nelp WB, Press OW, Badger CC, et al. Radiolabeled anti-CD45 monoclonal antibodies target lymphohematopoietic tissue in the macaque. Blood. 1991;78:1864–1874. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Matthews DC, Appelbaum FR, Eary JF, Fisher DR, Durack LD, Hui TE, Martin PJ, Mitchell D, Press OW, Storb R, et al. Phase I study of (131)I-anti-CD45 antibody plus cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation for advanced acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. Blood. 1999;94:1237–1247. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Scheinberg DA, Lovett D, Divgi CR, Graham MC, Berman E, Pentlow K, Feirt N, Finn RD, Clarkson BD, Gee TS, et al. A phase I trial of monoclonal antibody M195 in acute myelogenous leukemia: specific bone marrow targeting and internalization of radionuclide. J Clin Oncol. 1991;9:478–490. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1991.9.3.478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.van der Jagt RH, Badger CC, Appelbaum FR, Press OW, Matthews DC, Eary JF, Krohn KA, Bernstein ID. Localization of radiolabeled antimyeloid antibodies in a human acute leukemia xenograft tumor model. Cancer Res. 1992;52:89–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Appelbaum FR, Matthews DC, Eary JF, Badger CC, Kellogg M, Press OW, Martin PJ, Fisher DR, Nelp WB, Thomas ED, et al. The use of radiolabeled anti-CD33 antibody to augment marrow irradiation prior to marrow transplantation for acute myelogenous leukemia. Transplantation. 1992;54:829–833. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199211000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bunjes D, Buchmann I, Duncker C, Seitz U, Kotzerke J, Wiesneth M, Dohr D, Stefanic M, Buck A, Harsdorf SV, et al. Rhenium 188-labeled anti-CD66 (a, b, c, e) monoclonal antibody to intensify the conditioning regimen prior to stem cell transplantation for patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome: results of a phase I–II study. Blood. 2001;98:565–572. doi: 10.1182/blood.v98.3.565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pagel JM, Appelbaum FR, Eary JF, Rajendran J, Fisher DR, Gooley T, Ruffner K, Nemecek E, Sickle E, Durack L, et al. 131I-anti-CD45 antibody plus busulfan and cyclophosphamide before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for treatment of acute myeloid leukemia in first remission. Blood. 2006;107:2184–2191. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-06-2317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Schulz AS, Glatting G, Hoenig M, Schuetz C, Gatz SA, Grewendorf S, Sparber-Sauer M, Muche R, Blumstein N, Kropshofer G, et al. Radioimmunotherapy-based conditioning for hematopoietic cell transplantation in children with malignant and nonmalignant diseases. Blood. 2011;117:4642–4650. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-06-284349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Nakamae H, Wilbur DS, Hamlin DK, Thakar MS, Santos EB, Fisher DR, Kenoyer AL, Pagel JM, Press OW, Storb R, et al. Biodistributions, myelosuppression, and toxicities in mice treated with an anti-CD45 antibody labeled with the alpha-emitting radionuclides bismuth-213 or astatine-211. Cancer Res. 2009;69:2408–2415. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Nakamae H, Kerbauy FR, Wilbur DS, Bethge W, Hamlin DK, Santos EB, Storb R, Sandmaier BM. Pilot study of a (213)bismuth-labeled anti-CD45 mAb as a novel nonmyeloablative conditioning for DLA-haploidentical littermate hematopoietic transplantation. Transplantation. 2010;89:1336–1340. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181d98c3d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pagel JM, Kenoyer AL, Back T, Hamlin DK, Wilbur DS, Fisher DR, Park SI, Frayo S, Axtman A, Orgun N, et al. Anti-CD45 pretargeted radioimmunotherapy using bismuth-213: high rates of complete remission and long-term survival in a mouse myeloid leukemia xenograft model. Blood. 2011;118:703–711. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-04-347039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chen Y, Kornblit B, Hamlin DK, Sale GE, Santos EB, Wilbur DS, Storer BE, Storb R, Sandmaier BM. Durable donor engraftment after radioimmunotherapy using alpha-emitter astatine-211-labeled anti-CD45 antibody for conditioning in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood. 2012;119:1130–1138. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-09-380436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23*.Park SI, Shenoi J, Frayo SM, Hamlin DK, Lin Y, Wilbur DS, Stayton PS, Orgun N, Hylarides M, Buchegger F, et al. Pretargeted radioimmunotherapy using genetically engineered antibody-streptavidin fusion proteins for treatment of non-hodgkin lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:7373–7382. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-1204. This study provides evidence supporting the use of pretargeted radioimmunotherapy by demonstrating improved biodistribution of radiologic toxicity to targeted tumor tissues in mice. A useful innovation in this study is the development of non-streptavidin based methods for delivering the radioconjugate to the targeted antibody with evidence that this approach improved the specificity of delivery. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lin Y, Pagel JM, Axworthy D, Pantelias A, Hedin N, Press OW. A genetically engineered anti-CD45 single-chain antibody-streptavidin fusion protein for pretargeted radioimmunotherapy of hematologic malignancies. Cancer Res. 2006;66:3884–3892. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25**.Krance RA, Kuehnle I, Rill DR, Mei Z, Pinetta C, Evans W, Brown MP, Pule M, Heslop HE, Brenner MK. Hematopoietic and immunomodulatory effects of lytic CD45 monoclonal antibodies in patients with hematologic malignancy. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2003;9:273–281. doi: 10.1053/bbmt.2003.50024. Krance and colleagues performed a Phase I study in hematologic malignancy patients undergoing conditioning for allotransplantation to assess the safety of a pair of anti-CD45 mAbs which work synergistically to fix complement. This highly novel approach offers a promising method for minimizing the off-site toxicity of therapies aimed at elimination of specific cell populations. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wulf GG, Luo KL, Goodell MA, Brenner MK. Anti-CD45-mediated cytoreduction to facilitate allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2003;101:2434–2439. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-08-2379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Brenner MK, Wulf GG, Rill DR, Luo KL, Goodell MA, Mei Z, Kuehnle I, Brown MP, Pule M, Heslop HE, et al. Complement-fixing CD45 monoclonal antibodies to facilitate stem cell transplantation in mouse and man. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003;996:80–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb03236.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28**.Straathof KC, Rao K, Eyrich M, Hale G, Bird P, Berrie E, Brown L, Adams S, Schlegel PG, Goulden N, et al. Haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation with antibody-based minimal-intensity conditioning: a phase 1/2 study. Lancet. 2009;374:912–920. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60945-4. The complement fixing anti-CD45 mAb combination mentioned in Ref. 25 above was employed in a minimal-intensity conditioining regimen to prepare patients with primary immunodefiencies for allografts from HLA-match sibling and unrelated donors (14 total) and 2 patients receiving partially matched unrelated donor grafts. In addition to the mAb therapy, patients received fludarabine, low dose cyclophosphamide, and alemtuzumab to prevent primary graft failure. Interestingly, only one patient experienced primary graft failure, and the majority developed very high level donor chimerism in both the lymphoid and myeloid lineages, suggesting the antibody therapy may have helped clear niche space to facilitate donor engraftment. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Brown EJ, Frazier WA. Integrin-associated protein (CD47) and its ligands. Trends Cell Biol. 2001;11:130–135. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(00)01906-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30*.Chao MP, Jaiswal S, Weissman-Tsukamoto R, Alizadeh AA, Gentles AJ, Volkmer J, Weiskopf K, Willingham SB, Raveh T, Park CY, et al. Calreticulin is the dominant pro-phagocytic signal on multiple human cancers and is counterbalanced by CD47. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2:63ra94. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001375. Chao and colleagues identified calreticulin as a critical counterbalance to the “don’t eat me” signal provided by CD47, thus providing further insight into a natural system for regulation of cell elimination by the innate immune system that can be harnessed for therapeutic cell elimination. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31**.Jaiswal S, Jamieson CH, Pang WW, Park CY, Chao MP, Majeti R, Traver D, van Rooijen N, Weissman IL. CD47 is upregulated on circulating hematopoietic stem cells and leukemia cells to avoid phagocytosis. Cell. 2009;138:271–285. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.05.046. This paper revealed the importance of CD47 expression on hematopoietic stem cells, and its upregulation when HSC mobilize out of their marrow niches. Leukemic blasts appear to utilize this natural protective mechanism to facilitate their transit out of marrow niches. CD47 thus may be a useful therapeutic target for eliminating malignant HSC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32**.Majeti R, Chao MP, Alizadeh AA, Pang WW, Jaiswal S, Gibbs KD, Jr, van Rooijen N, Weissman IL. CD47 is an adverse prognostic factor and therapeutic antibody target on human acute myeloid leukemia stem cells. Cell. 2009;138:286–299. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.05.045. In addition to reporting higher level expression of CD47 in acute leukemia blasts associated with poor outcome, this study demonstrated in a xenograft model that antibodies targeting CD47 facilitated depletion of leukemic stem cells, a critical hurdle in the long-term cure of this malignancy. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33*.Chao MP, Alizadeh AA, Tang C, Jan M, Weissman-Tsukamoto R, Zhao F, Park CY, Weissman IL, Majeti R. Therapeutic antibody targeting of CD47 eliminates human acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Res. 2011;71:1374–1384. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2238. As with acute myelogenous leukemia (Ref. 32), acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells were also found to have uniformly elevated expression of CD47, demonstrating that this antigen maybe a useful target for a wide range of hematologic malignancies. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34**.Willingham SB, Volkmer JP, Gentles AJ, Sahoo D, Dalerba P, Mitra SS, Wang J, Contreras-Trujillo H, Martin R, Cohen JD, et al. The CD47-signal regulatory protein alpha (SIRPa) interaction is a therapeutic target for human solid tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:6662–6667. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1121623109. The upregulation of CD47 is not unique to hematologic malignancies, as demonstrated in this expansive work by Willingham and colleagues in which 11 types of solid tumor were shown, by various methods, to have high expression of CD47, with markedly elevated expression in comparison to adjacent non-malignant cells. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Edris B, Weiskopf K, Volkmer AK, Volkmer JP, Willingham SB, Contreras-Trujillo H, Liu J, Majeti R, West RB, Fletcher JA, et al. Antibody therapy targeting the CD47 protein is effective in a model of aggressive metastatic leiomyosarcoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:6656–6661. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1121629109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36**.Czechowicz A, Kraft D, Weissman IL, Bhattacharya D. Efficient transplantation via antibody-based clearance of hematopoietic stem cell niches. Science. 2007;318:1296–1299. doi: 10.1126/science.1149726. Czechowicz and colleagues were the first to demonstrate use of an antibody interfering with a stem cell growth factor being useful for conditioning hosts to receive allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell grafts. Anti-c-kit therapy facilitated achievement of significant donor chimerism after a single administration of antibody and one stem cell graft in immunodeficient mice. This model is important because it demonstrates that in the absence of immune barriers, this method for clearing niche space is highly effective and well-tolerated. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Xue X, Pech NK, Shelley WC, Srour EF, Yoder MC, Dinauer MC. Antibody targeting KIT as pretransplantation conditioning in immunocompetent mice. Blood. 2010;116:5419–5422. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-07-295949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bornhauser M, Platzbecker U, Theuser C, Holig K, Ehninger G. CD34+-enriched peripheral blood progenitor cells from unrelated donors for allografting of adult patients: high risk of graft failure, infection and relapse despite donor lymphocyte add-back. Br J Haematol. 2002;118:1095–1103. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2002.03731.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lacerda JF, Martins C, Carmo JA, Lourenco F, Juncal C, Rodrigues A, Vilalobos I, Moura MC, Ligeiro D, Martinho A, et al. Haploidentical stem cell transplantation with purified CD34 cells after a chemotherapy-alone conditioning regimen. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2003;9:633–642. doi: 10.1016/s1083-8791(03)00263-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kopp HG, Wirths S, Faul C, Bethge W, Scheding S, Brugger W, Kanz L, Vogel W. Long-term results after transplantation of CD34+ selected (CellPro) versus unselected peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) from related allogeneic donors. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2010;136:1921–1927. doi: 10.1007/s00432-010-0851-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41*.Marabelle A, Merlin E, Halle P, Paillard C, Berger M, Tchirkov A, Rousseau R, Leverger G, Piguet C, Stephan JL, et al. CD34+ immunoselection of autologous grafts for the treatment of high-risk neuroblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011;56:134–142. doi: 10.1002/pbc.22840. Marabelle and colleagues found 50% of neuroblastoma peripheral blood stem cell autografts to be contaminated with neuroblastoma cells, demonstrating the need to purify stem cells from other circulating cells to prevent reinfusion of malignant progenitors. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42*.Negrin RS, Atkinson K, Leemhuis T, Hanania E, Juttner C, Tierney K, Hu WW, Johnston LJ, Shizurn JA, Stockerl-Goldstein KE, et al. Transplantation of highly purified CD34+Thy-1+ hematopoietic stem cells in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2000;6:262–271. doi: 10.1016/s1083-8791(00)70008-5. Over one third (11/30) of bone marrow samples from patients with breast cancer were found in this study to have cytokeratin-expressing cells consistent with metastatic breast cancer, with a range of involvement of 1/30,855 to 1/693,386 cells. Two of these patients, in fact, exhibited CD34-expressing cytokeratin-positive cells, suggesting CD34 selection would not be an adequate mechanism for tumor cell depletion. Furthermore, 36% of patients were found to have cytokeratin positive cells in the apheresis product or CD34-enriched fraction thereof. The grafts administered to patients were further refined by positive sorting for expression of CD34 and CD90 (Thy-1), and this additional cell selection eliminated cytokeratin-positive cells from all 22 grafts administered to patients. Long-term outcomes from this trial are reported in Ref. 48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43*.Gazitt Y, Reading CC, Hoffman R, Wickrema A, Vesole DH, Jagannath S, Condino J, Lee B, Barlogie B, Tricot G. Purified CD34+ Lin- Thy+ stem cells do not contain clonal myeloma cells. Blood. 1995;86:381–389. As with the breast cancer trial discussed in Ref 42, myeloma progenitor cells were also eliminated (3 – 7 log depletion) from autologous grafts by positive selection for expression of CD34 and CD90, suggesting that this phenotype is likely to be useful for purified autologous stem cell grafts in multiple malignancies. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Tricot G, Gazitt Y, Leemhuis T, Jagannath S, Desikan KR, Siegel D, Fassas A, Tindle S, Nelson J, Juttner C, et al. Collection, tumor contamination, and engraftment kinetics of highly purified hematopoietic progenitor cells to support high dose therapy in multiple myeloma. Blood. 1998;91:4489–4495. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45*.Michallet M, Philip T, Philip I, Godinot H, Sebban C, Salles G, Thiebaut A, Biron P, Lopez F, Mazars P, et al. Transplantation with selected autologous peripheral blood CD34+Thy1+ hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) in multiple myeloma: impact of HSC dose on engraftment, safety, and immune reconstitution. Exp Hematol. 2000;28:858–870. doi: 10.1016/s0301-472x(00)00169-7. This study identified a threshhold dose of 8x10e5 CD34+CD90+ cells per kilogram recipient weight as a target to ensure prompt engraftment of all patients. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Vose JM, Bierman PJ, Lynch JC, Atkinson K, Juttner C, Hanania CE, Bociek G, Armitage JO. Transplantation of highly purified CD34+Thy-1+ hematopoietic stem cells in patients with recurrent indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2001;7:680–687. doi: 10.1053/bbmt.2001.v7.pm11787531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Fields KK, Elfenbein GJ, Trudeau WL, Perkins JB, Janssen WE, Moscinski LC. Clinical significance of bone marrow metastases as detected using the polymerase chain reaction in patients with breast cancer undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14:1868–1876. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.6.1868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48**.Muller AM, Kohrt HE, Cha S, Laport G, Klein J, Guardino AE, Johnston LJ, Stockerl-Goldstein KE, Hanania E, Juttner C, et al. Long-term outcome of patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with high-dose chemotherapy and transplantation of purified autologous hematopoietic stem cells. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012;18:125–133. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2011.07.009. This study reports the long-term outcomes of patients treated with CD34+CD90+ purified hematopoietic stem cells on the trial described in Ref 42. Five of 22 (23%) patients were still alive, 4 (18%) of whom were still in remission more than 12 years following autografting for stage 4 breast cancer. Although this study is small, these numbers compare favorably with a comparative study of 74 patients who underwent high-dose therapy but then received a conventional unmanipulated autografts, amongst whom only 7% remained disease free. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49*.Muller AM, Shashidhar S, Kupper NJ, Kohrt HE, Florek M, Negrin RS, Brown JM, Shizuru JA. Co-transplantation of pure blood stem cells with antigen-specific but not bulk T cells augments functional immunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:5820–5825. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1120237109. In this proof-of-principle study, provision of pathogen-specific T cells (sorted by tetramer) in addition to purified allogeneic T cells led to superior reconstitution of pathogen-specific immunity in mice, whereas administration of stem cells with bulk T cells led to poor immune recovery with domination of the T cell compartment by effector memory cells with little regeneration of a naïve T cell pool. This study provides evidence that reductionist manipulation of grafts may enhance immune reconstitution by avoiding the deleterious effects of bulk transer of donor T cells. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Elmaagacli AH, Peceny R, Steckel N, Trenschel R, Ottinger H, Grosse-Wilde H, Schaefer UW, Beelen DW. Outcome of transplantation of highly purified peripheral blood CD34+ cells with T-cell add-back compared with unmanipulated bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cells from HLA-identical sibling donors in patients with first chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2003;101:446–453. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-05-1615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Aversa F, Terenzi A, Tabilio A, Falzetti F, Carotti A, Ballanti S, Felicini R, Falcinelli F, Velardi A, Ruggeri L, et al. Full haplotype-mismatched hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation: a phase II study in patients with acute leukemia at high risk of relapse. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:3447–3454. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.09.117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Devine SM, Carter S, Soiffer RJ, Pasquini MC, Hari PN, Stein A, Lazarus HM, Linker C, Stadtmauer EA, Alyea EP, 3rd, et al. Low risk of chronic graft-versus-host disease and relapse associated with T cell-depleted peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for acute myelogenous leukemia in first remission: results of the blood and marrow transplant clinical trials network protocol 0303. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2011;17:1343–1351. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2011.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53*.Tsao GJ, Allen JA, Logronio KA, Lazzeroni LC, Shizuru JA. Purified hematopoietic stem cell allografts reconstitute immunity superior to bone marrow. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:3288–3293. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0813335106. This study demonstrated in mouse transplant studies that T cell replete whole bone marrow grafts lead to subclinical graft-versus-host destruction of lymphoid organs, whereas purified HSC grafts led to improved recovery of lymphoid organ architecture following transplantation. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54*.Muller AM, Linderman JA, Florek M, Miklos D, Shizuru JA. Allogeneic T cells impair engraftment and hematopoiesis after stem cell transplantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:14721–14726. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1009220107. Building on the findings in Ref. 53, this study evaluated hematopoietic and lymphoid organ recovery following allotransplantation in mice with minor histocompatibility differences (ie, more akin to the type of allotransplants performed in humans). Supression of lymphoid reconstitution as well as hematopoiesis was demonstrated in recipients of T replete grafts, again suggesting subclinical graft-versus-host reactions are paradoxically deleterious to recovery of normal immunity after allotransplantation in comparison with purified HSC grafts. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Scandling JD, Busque S, Dejbakhsh-Jones S, Benike C, Sarwal M, Millan MT, Shizuru JA, Lowsky R, Engleman EG, Strober S. Tolerance and Withdrawal of Immunosuppressive Drugs in Patients Given Kidney and Hematopoietic Cell Transplants. Am J Transplant. 2012;12:1133–1145. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.03992.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Beilhack GF, Scheffold YC, Weissman IL, Taylor C, Jerabek L, Burge MJ, Masek MA, Shizuru JA. Purified allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation blocks diabetes pathogenesis in NOD mice. Diabetes. 2003;52:59–68. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.52.1.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Beilhack GF, Landa RR, Masek MA, Shizuru JA. Prevention of type 1 diabetes with major histocompatibility complex-compatible and nonmarrow ablative hematopoietic stem cell transplants. Diabetes. 2005;54:1770–1779. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.54.6.1770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Smith-Berdan S, Gille D, Weissman IL, Christensen JL. Reversal of autoimmune disease in lupus-prone New Zealand black/New Zealand white mice by nonmyeloablative transplantation of purified allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells. Blood. 2007;110:1370–1378. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-03-081497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Nomoto K, Yung-Yun K, Omoto K, Umesue M, Murakami Y, Matsuzaki G, Nomoto K. Tolerance induction in a fully allogeneic combination using anti-T cell receptor-alpha beta monoclonal antibody, low dose irradiation, and donor bone marrow transfusion. Transplantation. 1995;59:395–401. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Bethge WA, Wilbur DS, Storb R, Hamlin DK, Santos EB, Brechbiel MW, Fisher DR, Sandmaier BM. Selective T-cell ablation with bismuth-213-labeled anti-TCRalphabeta as nonmyeloablative conditioning for allogeneic canine marrow transplantation. Blood. 2003;101:5068–5075. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-12-3867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Barsoukov AA, Moore PF, Storb R, Santos EB, Sandmaier BM. The use of an anti-TCRalphabeta monoclonal antibody to control host-versus-graft reactions in canine marrow allograft recipients conditioned with low dose total body irradiation. Transplantation. 1999;67:1329–1335. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199905270-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Soiffer RJ, Lerademacher J, Ho V, Kan F, Artz A, Champlin RE, Devine S, Isola L, Lazarus HM, Marks DI, et al. Impact of immune modulation with anti-T-cell antibodies on the outcome of reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for hematologic malignancies. Blood. 2011;117:6963–6970. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-01-332007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Finke J, Bethge WA, Schmoor C, Ottinger HD, Stelljes M, Zander AR, Volin L, Ruutu T, Heim DA, Schwerdtfeger R, et al. Standard graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis with or without anti-T-cell globulin in haematopoietic cell transplantation from matched unrelated donors: a randomised, open-label, multicentre phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:855–864. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70225-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Socie G, Schmoor C, Bethge WA, Ottinger HD, Stelljes M, Zander AR, Volin L, Ruutu T, Heim DA, Schwerdtfeger R, et al. Chronic graft-versus-host disease: long-term results from a randomized trial on graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis with or without anti-T-cell globulin ATG-Fresenius. Blood. 2011;117:6375–6382. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-01-329821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Appleman LJ, Tzachanis D, Grader-Beck T, Van Puijenbroek AA, Boussiotis VA. Induction of immunologic tolerance for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Leuk Lymphoma. 2002;43:1159–1167. doi: 10.1080/10428190290026213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Adams AB, Durham MM, Kean L, Shirasugi N, Ha J, Williams MA, Rees PA, Cheung MC, Mittelstaedt S, Bingaman AW, et al. Costimulation blockade, busulfan, and bone marrow promote titratable macrochimerism, induce transplantation tolerance, and correct genetic hemoglobinopathies with minimal myelosuppression. J Immunol. 2001;167:1103–1111. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.2.1103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67*.Durham MM, Bingaman AW, Adams AB, Ha J, Waitze SY, Pearson TC, Larsen CP. Cutting edge: administration of anti-CD40 ligand and donor bone marrow leads to hemopoietic chimerism and donor-specific tolerance without cytoreductive conditioning. J Immunol. 2000;165:1–4. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.1.1. This exciting paper demonstrated the achievement of macrochimerism and donor-specific tolerance in allotransplanted mice conditioned only with CD40-signal blockade. Unfortunately, the approach using intact anti-CD40 ligand mAbs, did not translate well to clinical use, but this approach may yet prove useful with other agents inhibiting this critical signal in professional antigen presenting cells. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Kawai T, Andrews D, Colvin RB, Sachs DH, Cosimi AB. Thromboembolic complications after treatment with monoclonal antibody against CD40 ligand. Nat Med. 2000;6:114. doi: 10.1038/72162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Page A, Srinivasan S, Singh K, Russell M, Hamby K, Deane T, Sen S, Stempora L, Leopardi F, Price AA, et al. CD40 blockade combines with CTLA4Ig and sirolimus to produce mixed chimerism in an MHC-defined rhesus macaque transplant model. Am J Transplant. 2012;12:115–125. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03737.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Riddell SR, Elliott M, Lewinsohn DA, Gilbert MJ, Wilson L, Manley SA, Lupton SD, Overell RW, Reynolds TC, Corey L, et al. T-cell mediated rejection of gene-modified HIV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes in HIV-infected patients. Nat Med. 1996;2:216–223. doi: 10.1038/nm0296-216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Tarantal AF, Giannoni F, CCIL, Wherley J, Sumiyoshi T, Martinez M, Kahl CA, Elashoff D, Louie SG, Kohn DB. Nonmyeloablative Conditioning Regimen to Increase Engraftment of Gene-modified Hematopoietic Stem Cells in Young Rhesus Monkeys. Mol Ther. 2012;20:1033–1045. doi: 10.1038/mt.2011.312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Bhattacharya D, Rossi DJ, Bryder D, Weissman IL. Purified hematopoietic stem cell engraftment of rare niches corrects severe lymphoid deficiencies without host conditioning. J Exp Med. 2006;203:73–85. doi: 10.1084/jem.20051714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
