Abstract
Mercury (Hg) is one of the most toxic heavy metal and is extremely harmful for the environment. The permissible limit of mercury in industrial effluents is 0.001 ppm, whereas there are various sites having very high levels of mercury contamination. In the present study, 10 different mercury (Hg) resistant bacterial strains were isolated from Ulhas Estuary, Mumbai (Hg concentration of 107 ppm). All the strains were subsequently grown on higher concentration of mercuric chloride (HgCl2), one of the isolate (USP5) showed significant growth at high concentration of Hg (40 ppm) and 16S rRNA gene sequencing revealed the identity of the bacterium as Methylotenera mobilis, (Accession no. KT714144). The mer operon was isolated and cloned in E.coli and checked for its ability to tolerate higher concentration of Hg. It has shown growth up to 70 ppm of Hg, also presence of merA gene indicated its ability to detoxify Hg into less toxic volatile form. The atomic absorption spectrophotometry confirmed the ability of clone to efficiently detoxify 60–90 % of the Hg (10–70 ppm) within 48–72 h. This clone can be used for effective volatilization of Hg from contaminated areas.
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12088-016-0613-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Keywords: Mercury detoxification, merA, Atomic absorption spectrophotometry
The discharge of mercury into the environment as a result of industrial and anthropogenic sources has resulted in mercury pollution affecting ecosystems and human health and is problematic in both developed as well as developing countries [1–3]. Mercury is a potent neurotoxin [4, 5] and exposure can lead to paresthesia and numbness in the fingers and toes, clumsiness, neurasthenia, fatigue, inability to concentrate, loss in vision and hearing impairment, coma followed by death, It gets accumulated in tissues worsening the condition [6]. As per the reports of Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) and Toxic Link Factsheet, industrial effluent discharge contains mercury ranging from 0.058 to 0.268 ppm, which is many folds as prescribed by WHO and Indian standards of 0.001 ppm [7]. The permissible limit of mercury has been surpassed and entered the food chain [8, 9]. It poses significant challenges for industries as it is difficult to remove. The exposure of microbes to extreme conditions enforces the microbes to survive through genetic modifications [10, 11]. Few microbes have developed a unique way to tolerate high concentration of mercury [12, 13] by possessing the clustered genes in mer operon, located in the plasmids [14]. Amongst various genes in the operon, merA gene encodes for mercury reductase enzyme which breaks down inorganic form of mercury (Hg2+) to less toxic and volatile form of mercury (Hg°), and released in environment [15, 16]. Modern techniques have facilitated the cloning of functional genes and operons and utilize them to the full extent [17–20]. The present study was undertaken to isolate mercury resistant bacteria and to clone mer operon in order to check its ability to grow as well as detoxify Hg at higher concentration.
The soil sample was collected from Ulhas estuary, Mumbai, India having Hg concentration of 107 ppm and different microbes were isolated using nutrient agar g/L (Yeast Extract 1.5, Beef Extract 1.5, Peptone 5.0, NaCl 5.0, Agar 20.0) supplemented with HgCl2 (5 ppm) overlaid with different solvents (2.0 %; butanol, propanol, toluene, chloroform and methanol). Ten isolates were selected on the basis of their morphologically distinct features. The isolates were further grown in nutrient broth supplemented with higher concentrations of mercury chloride (HgCl2) for 24–48 h at 37 °C. The bacterium (USP5) showing maximum tolerance towards HgCl2 (40 ppm) was selected for further studies. For identification of the isolate (USP5), 16S rRNA gene sequencing was done by isolating genomic DNA (HiPurATM Bacterial Genomic DNA Purification Kit, HIMEDIA). Two sets of primers 27F [5′ AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG 3′] and 1492R [5′ TACGGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT 3′] [21, 22] were used in 50 µl reaction in an automated thermocycler (Eppendorf AG 22331). The PCR product in the region of 1.5 kb was eluted and purified using HiYield Gel/PCR DNA Mini Kit (Real Biotech Corporation, Taiwan) and sequencing was done. The partial sequence of the amplified 16S rRNA gene was analyzed using BLAST tool on NCBI (www.ncbi.nlm.nig.gov) and was identified as Methylotenera mobilis. Chimera for the sequence was checked using DECIPHER’s Find Chimeras web tool (http://decipher.cee.wisc.edu/FindChimeras.html) and the sequence was submitted to Gene Bank with Accession No. KT714144.
Cloning of mer operon of USP5 was done to check its capacity to transform Hg from toxic to less toxic form. Partial digestion of DNA was done with the restriction endonuclease Sau3AI at 37 °C. Aliquots from the digestion were removed at different time intervals. The DNA fragments were visualized on 0.8 % agarose gel. Restriction fragments between 5 kb and 10 kb (Fig. S1) were purified by using HiYield Gel/PCR DNA Mini Kit (Real Biotech Corporation, Taiwan). The plasmid pUC19 was digested with BamHI at 37 °C for 4 h and ligated to the compatible ends of the Sau3AI fragment. The ligation reaction was allowed to proceed at 16 °C for 8 h. The recombinant DNA plasmid was then transformed into competent E. coli strain DH5α. Transformants were grown on LB plates containing ampicillin (100 µg/mL), Xgal (20 mg/mL) and isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (200 mg/mL).
White colonies were picked and grown at subsequently higher concentration of Hg along with ampicillin (100 µg/mL). It has shown growth at higher level of Hg (70 ppm). To check the size of the insert in recombinant, plasmid DNA was isolated from an overnight culture of clone (QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit). Purified plasmid was digested with BamH1 at 37 °C for 4 h and visualized on agarose gel along with pUC19 (digested with BamH1 as control) and 10 kb DNA ladder (Merck Millipore, India). The position of the bands indicated the insertion of the desired **region in pUC19 (Fig. 1a).
Fig. 1.

a Restriction digestion of plasmid isolated from recombinant clone of mer operon L1 10 kb ladder, L2 Recombinant clone digested with BamH1, L3 pUC19 digested with BamH1; b Amplified merA gene of USP5 clone, L1 10 kb DNA Ladder, L2 Amplified merA gene (~1.6 kb) of clone
To check the potential of clone to volatilize Hg, amplification of merA gene was performed by using specific primer set’s, merA F (5′TGAAGCCGTTGCTTTGAACG3′), and merA R (5′ GCTGCTCGTAATGCAATCGG3′) and PCR Master Mix (Fermentas Life Sciences, USA) in 50 µl reaction with following PCR Cycles: Initial denaturation was performed at 94 °C for 5 min and then 40 cycles including denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 45 °C for 30 s and extension at 72 °C for 1 min and final extension at 72 °C for 5 min in an automated thermocycler (Eppendorf AG 22331). The PCR product along with 10 kb DNA ladder (Merck Millipore, India) was visualized (Fig. 1b). The product was eluted and purified using HiYield Gel/PCR DNA Mini Kit (Real Biotech Corporation, Taiwan) and sent for sequencing. The sequence revealed the presence of merA gene (930 bp; Fig. S2), in the clone. Multiple sequence alignment (MSA) was done for the sequence obtained, with the merA sequences from NCBI (www.ncbi.nlm.nig.gov) (highly similar sequences on the basis of BLAST tool result) using Clustal Omega (Fig. S3). The MSA shows high similarity authenticating the merA sequence of USP5 clone. The phylogenetic tree was constructed with same sequences using MEGA6 (Fig. S4). The merA gene product has the capability to convert the dangerous methyl mercury and other organic mercury derivatives to ionic mercury; which can then be reduced to Hg° [23, 24].
For the confirmation and quantification of volatilization of Hg, atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AAS) was performed. Positive clone (E. coli DH5α + pUC 19 + mer operon) along with controls (E. coli DH5α + pUC 19, E. coli DH5α) and M. mobilis strain (USP5) were inoculated in NB medium along with 10 ppm HgCl2 and transferred subsequently to higher concentrations of mercury till 70 ppm (beyond that the positive clone was not able to grow) and incubated at 37 °C, 180 rpm for 24 h. Broth was centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 10 min. at room temperature. The supernatant was withdrawn and checked for degradation of HgCl2 by CV-AAS (Ananlytical Jena make (Vario-6) Cold Vapor HG-AAS). AAS study indicated that controls (E. coli DH5α + pUC 19, E. coli DH5α) were not able to reduce the level of Hg and, M. mobilis strain (USP5) was able to volatilize HgCl2 (20 % at 10 ppm, 12 % at 20 ppm, 7 % at 30 ppm and only 5 % at 40 ppm) where as positive clone efficiently volatilize HgCl2 (90 % at 10 ppm, 88 % at 20 ppm, 74 % at 30 ppm, 62 % at 40 ppm, 55 % at 50 ppm, 48 % at 60 ppm and 45 % at 70 ppm etc.) (Fig. 2). Different Hg detoxification studies have shown the efficient quantification of non-radioactive volatilization of mercury using CV-AAS [25, 26].
Fig. 2.
Mercury Biotransformation by USP5 clone: Clone (E.coli + pUC19 + mer operon; filled squre) was grown in different conc. of mercury (10–70 ppm) and up to 90 % volatilization was observed, while E.coli and E.coli + pUC19 (controls) were not able to volatilize mercury even at 10 ppm. Methylotenera mobilis (USP5; line squre) did volatilization up to 20 % at 10 ppm HgCl2 but not able to grow beyond 40 ppm
The mercury resistant clone could grow in high Hg levels, also has excellent potential of biological detoxification of mercury. It can be utilized for improving water and soil quality as well as helps in efficiently transforming toxic form of Hg into less toxic volatile form.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgments
We are thankful to the Science and Engineering Board (SERB), Government of India, for providing funds for the project, NO.SR/FT/LS-36/2011.
References
- 1.Kiyono M, Pan-Hou H. Genetic engineering of bacteria for environmental remediation of mercury. J Health Sci. 2006;52:199–204. doi: 10.1248/jhs.52.199. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zeyaullah M, Islam B, Ali A. Isolation, identification and PCR amplification of merA gene from highly mercury polluted Yamuna river. Afr J Biotechnol. 2010;9:3510–3514. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jan AT, Azam M, Ali A, Mohd Q, Haq R. Molecular characterization of mercury resistant bacteria inhabiting polluted water bodies of different geographical locations in India. Curr Microbiol. 2012;65:14–21. doi: 10.1007/s00284-012-0118-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kishan KVR, Vohra RM, Ganesan K, Agrawal V, Sharma VM, Sharma R. Molecular structure of d-hydantoinase from Bacillus sp. AR9: evidence for mercury inhibition. J Mol Biol. 2005;347:95–105. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Banerjee M, Karri R, Rawat KS, Muthuvel K, Pathak B, Roy G. Chemical detoxification of organomercurials. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2015;54:9323–9327. doi: 10.1002/anie.201504413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Jaiswal G, Porwal S. Role of mercury resistance (mer) operon in bioremediation of mercury contamination. J Biol Chem Res. 2014;2:986–997. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mercury pollution of India, Centre for Science and Environment. http://www.cseindia.org/node/439
- 8.Boyd ES, King S, Tomberlin JK, Nordstrom DK, Krabbenhoft DP, Barkay T, Geesey GG. Methylmercury enters an aquatic food web through acidophilic microbial mats in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming. Environ Microbiol. 2009;11:950–959. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01820.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Foster KL, Stern GA, Pazerniuk MA, Hickie B, Walkusz W, Wang F, Macdonald RW. Mercury biomagnification in marine zooplankton food webs in Hudson Bay. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46:12952–12959. doi: 10.1021/es303434p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kalia VC. Extending genomic limits through metagenomic exploration. J Cosmol. 2010;13:3625–3627. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sangwan N, Lambert C, Sharma A, Gupta V, Khurana P, Khurana JP, Sockett RE, Gilbert JA, Lal R. Arsenic rich Himalayan hot spring metagenomics reveal genetically novel predator–prey genotypes. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2015;7:812–823. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.12297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Eric B, Barkay T. The mercury resistance operon: from an origin in a geothermal environment to an efficient detoxification machine. Front Microbiol. 2012;3:349. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Santos-Gandelman JF, Cruz K, Crane S, Muricy G, Giambiagi-deMarval M, Barkay T, Laport MS. Potential application in mercury bioremediation of a marine sponge-isolated Bacillus cereus strain Pj1. Curr Microbiol. 2014;69:374–380. doi: 10.1007/s00284-014-0597-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Segura A, Molina L, Ramos JL (2014) Plasmid-Mediated tolerance toward environmental pollutants. Microbiol Spectr 2. doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.PLAS-0013-2013 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 15.Lal D, Lal R. Evolution of mercuric reductase (merA) gene: a case of horizontal gene transfer. Microbiology. 2010;79:500–508. doi: 10.1134/S0026261710040120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Møller AK, Barkay T, Hansen MA, Norman A, Hansen LH, Sørensen SJ, Boyd ES, Kroer N. Mercuric reductase genes (merA) and mercury resistance plasmids in high Arctic snow, freshwater and sea-ice brine. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2014;87:52–63. doi: 10.1111/1574-6941.12189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sharma R, Ranjan R, Kapardar RK, Grover A. Unculturable bacterial diversity: an untapped resource. Curr Sci. 2005;89:72–77. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ranjan R, Grover A, Kapardar RK, Sharma R. Isolation of novel lipolytic genes from uncultured bacteria of pond water. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;335:57–65. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.07.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chauhan NS, Ranjan R, Purohit HJ, Kalia VC, Sharma R. Identification of genes conferring arsenic resistance to Escherichiacoli from an effluent treatment plant sludge metagenomic library. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2008;67:130–139. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00613.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kapley A, Purohit HJ. Genomic tools in bioremediation. Indian J Microbiol. 2009;49:108–111. doi: 10.1007/s12088-009-0012-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Rani A, Porwal S, Sharma R, Kapley A, Purohit HJ, Kalia VC. Assessment of microbial diversity in effluent treatment plants by culture dependent and culture independent approaches. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99:7098–7107. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Thakre NA, Shanware AS. Promising biological indicator of heavy metal pollution: bioluminescent bacterial strains isolated and characterized from Marine Niches of Goa, India. Indian J Microbiol. 2015;55:327–332. doi: 10.1007/s12088-015-0531-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Dash HR, Das S. Bioremediation of mercury and the importance of bacterial mer genes. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 2012;75:207–213. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2012.07.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sangwan N, Lata P, Dwivedi V, Singh A, Niharika N, Kaur J, Anand S, Malhotra J, Jindal S, Nigam A, Lal D, Dua A, Saxena A, Garg N, Verma M, Kaur J, Mukherjee U, Gilbert JA, Dowd SE, Raman R, Khurana P, Khurana JP, Lal R. Comparative metagenomic analysis of soil microbial communities across three hexachlorocyclohexane contamination levels. PLoS One. 2012;7:e46219. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gupta N, Ali A. Mercury volatilization by R Factor systems in Escherichia coli isolated from aquatic environments of India. Curr Microbiol. 2004;48:88–96. doi: 10.1007/s00284-003-4054-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Coufalík P, Zvěřina O, Komárek J. Determination of mercury species using thermal desorption analysis in AAS. Chem Pap. 2014;68:427–434. doi: 10.2478/s11696-013-0471-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

