Abstract
Chloroquine (CQ) remains the first-line treatment of malaria in Haiti. Given the challenges of conducting in vivo drug efficacy trials in low-endemic settings like Haiti, molecular surveillance for drug resistance markers is a reasonable approach for detecting resistant parasites. In this study, 349 blood spots were collected from suspected malaria cases in areas in and around Port-au-Prince from March to July 2010. Among them, 121 samples that were Plasmodium falciparum positive by polymerase chain reaction were genotyped for drug-resistant pfcrt, pfdhfr, pfdhps, and pfmdr1 alleles. Among the 108 samples that were successfully sequenced for CQ resistant markers in pfcrt, 107 were wild type (CVMNK), whereas one sample carried a CQ-resistant allele (CVIET). Neutral microsatellite genotyping revealed that the CQ-resistant isolate was distinct from all other samples in this study. Furthermore, the remaining parasite specimens appeared to be genetically distinct from other reported Central and South American populations.
Introduction
Plasmodium falciparum is endemic on the island of Hispaniola, which comprises the countries of the Dominican Republic and the Republic of Haiti. Almost all cases of malaria in Haiti are reported to be P. falciparum, whereas Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium malariae are rarely reported in Haiti.1,2 P. falciparum remains sensitive to treatment with chloroquine (CQ), and therefore it is the first-line therapy in both countries. Once the mainstay of global P. falciparum treatment, resistance to CQ has developed throughout the world except in Hispaniola and Central America.
There is concern that CQ resistance will spread to or develop in Hispaniola as it has in other parts of the world. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends monitoring for CQ resistance by in vivo efficacy studies every 2–3 years, in general, depending on the level of transmission. However, conducting such trials can be expensive and time consuming in countries where malaria incidence is low; therefore, molecular surveillance has become a valuable tool for assessing the prevalence of CQ– and sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine (SP)–resistant parasites in countries with low malaria transmission.3,4 Recently, WHO has included in its recommendations that in areas with low to very low transmission, studies with molecular markers should be conducted systematically every year provided that markers are known and validated.
In vivo trials in Haiti found no evidence of CQ resistance during the 1980s.5 More recently, studies have taken advantage of the well-characterized molecular basis for CQ resistance to assess the prevalence of resistance mutations. To assess CQ resistance, mutations in the P. falciparum CQ resistance transporter (pfcrt) gene are most relevant, with the critical point mutations being present in codon 76 of the gene resulting in an amino acid change from lysine to threonine. In addition to the K76T codon mutation, mutations in codons 72, 73, and 74 also occur, and are relevant to the geographic context of where the original CQ-resistant population originated and subsequently spread. Thus, SVMNT haplotype parasites are found in the P. falciparum–endemic regions of South America and CVIET haplotype parasites are found in Africa and southeast Asia.
There have been conflicting reports regarding the presence of K76T mutation in P. falciparum isolates from Haiti.6–9 Work conducted in the Haitian Department of Artibonite in 2009 reported only 6% of parasites carried the K76T mutation along with the CVIET haplotype (N = 79).6 Two cases of malaria that were imported to Canada, ostensibly from Haiti, carried the K76T mutation. However, 48 cases imported to France from Haiti carried only the wildtype CQ-sensitive allele.7 Between 2010 and 2011, 49 malaria patients from Leogane, 18 miles west of Port-au-Prince, showed no evidence of CQ treatment failures or resistant haplotypes.8 Similarly, there were no pfcrt-CQ-resistance markers present in P. falciparum parasites from 79 malaria case samples collected in Port-au-Prince, Artibonite, North Cap Haitian, Leogane, Hinche, and Jacmel in 2013.9 Finally, the most recent in vivo CQ-efficacy study conducted from 2011 to 2012 in Leogane and Port-au-Prince found no evidence of CQ-resistance mutations in parasites collected from treatment failures.10
In response to the Haitian earthquake of 2010, infectious disease surveillance was increased, especially where internally displaced persons were living at high risk for malaria infection. There was concern that large population movements and poor living conditions could increase vector exposure and therefore dramatically increase the risk of malaria transmission. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) assisted the Haiti Ministry of Public Health and Population in the implementation of enhanced malaria surveillance.11 Herein, we report the prevalence of CQ- and SP-resistant alleles by testing mutation patterns in four genes; pfcrt, pfdhfr, pfdhps, and pfmdr1. We also assessed the parasite population structure for evidence of parasite importation from other countries by the migration of foreign aid workers to support the postearthquake period relief effort.
Methods
Ethics approval.
Approval for this study was provided by the CDC human subjects office as part of an emergency response and assistance effort, and was approved as nonresearch activity. As per this approval, verbal consent was obtained. No local ethics review process was functioning immediately after the earthquake; however, agreement for the study was obtained with the Haiti Ministry of Public Health and Population.
Sample collection and processing.
Dried blood spots from patients with suspected or confirmed malaria were collected from existing and temporary health facilities in metropolitan and suburban Port-au-Prince, principally at the international airport, in Carrefour, Leogane, and Jacmel after the earthquake (N = 349) from March to November 2010. Thirty blood spot specimens that were collected came from Ranquitte in the North Department, as part of a larger effort to measure the malaria trends described previously.11 Almost all the participating facilities were supported by nongovernmental organizations that were assisting in the earthquake response effort. Dried blood spot specimens were collected from febrile patients with suspected malaria infection. Some were tested for the presence of malaria parasites using rapid diagnostic tests and/or microscopy. The dried blood spots were collected on Whatman 903 Protein Saver Cards (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) for molecular testing. Collected specimens were stored in individual ziplock bags containing silica gel desiccant and were kept at approximately 4°C when possible. Filter paper samples were collected periodically and transported to the CDC for processing. DNA was extracted from dried blood spots using the QIAamp DNA blood mini kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA) per manufacturer's instructions. A nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplifying the 18s ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene was used to confirm malaria diagnosis and differentiate malaria species.12
Targeted gene amplification and sequence analysis.
PCR amplification was performed for pfcrt, pfdhfr, pfdhps, and pfmdr1 using primers and conditions noted in Supplemental Table 1. Sanger sequencing of the amplified gene fragments was performed using an Applied Biosystems 3130 capillary sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) to monitor mutations associated with drug resistance in the targeted genes. Sequences were deposited in the GenBank repository (accession nos.: KP704735–KP705069).
Microsatellite analysis.
Seven neutral microsatellite loci spanning six chromosomes (TA1, chromosome 6; poly α, chromosome 4; PfPK2, chromosome 12; TA109, chromosome 6; and 2490, chromosome 10; C2M24, chromosome 2; and C3M69, chromosome 3) were used to assess the relatedness of P. falciparum isolates within Haiti and South America.13–15 Genomic DNA was amplified by nonnested or heminested PCR using previously described methods.12–15 Fluorescently labeled (HEX and FAM) PCR products were separated by capillary electrophoresis on an Applied Biosystems 3130xl analyzer. Alleles were sized and scored using GeneMapper v3.7 (Applied Biosystems), and binned to the nearest two or three base pairs.
Data analysis.
Summary statistics for drug-resistant haplotypes were generated using SAS 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).
The expected heterozygosity of each neutral microsatellite marker was calculated using the excel microsatellite toolkit for a locus j with i alleles:
![]() |
where h is the heterozygosity at a locus j and p is the allele frequency for an allele i. To estimate the extent of genetic variability within the population, the overall unbiased expected heterozygosity (He) was calculated as:
![]() |
where L is the number of loci and hj is the heterozygosity for each locus j.
A phylogenetic tree was constructed to visualize isolate clustering. To compare complete haplotypes without missing data, loci TA1 and 2490 were also removed to construct the final tree. A distance matrix from the microsatellite data was generated in Microsatellite Analyzer Software (University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria) using Nei's chord distance.16,17
![]() |
Then a phylogenetic tree utilizing the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) algorithm was constructed from the distance matrix using PHYLIP v3.695 (University of Washington, Seattle, WA) and edited in Geneious v6.1.6 (Biomatters, Auckland, New Zealand).18
To investigate the parasite population structure within Haiti, we used a Bayesian-based Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm in Structure 2.3.3.19,20 We ran simulations with the number of predicted clusters (K) from 1 to 20. The model parameters included admixture and correlated allele frequencies among populations with a running length of 10,000 burn-in steps, 100,000 MCMC iterations, and 20 replicate runs. The optimal number of K (clusters) was determined using Evanno's method and the ΔK value was calculated using Structure Harvester (Stanford, CA) (http://taylor0.biology.ucla.edu/struct_harvest/).21
The Haitian P. falciparum specimens were then compared with Central and South American parasite populations (Honduras, Nicaragua, Venezuela, and Brazil) using population pairwise Fst calculations in Arlequin v3.1 (University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland).22–25 The exact test of population differentiation was used with 1,000 permutations and a significance level of 0.05.
Results
Thirty-five percent of febrile patients screened for malaria by nested 18s rRNA PCR, were positive for P. falciparum (121/349). No other species of malaria parasites were found by 18s rRNA PCR. The PCR-positive samples were sequenced to identify drug resistance–associated mutations in pfcrt, pfdhps, pfdhfr, pfmdr1, and were genotyped using seven neutral microsatellites. We excluded 13 (4%) poor-quality samples that failed to amplify for all drug-resistance sequencing reactions (Figure 1 ) from additional analysis, leaving 108 samples.
Figure 1.
Flowchart of samples collected from March to November 2010 to assess molecular markers of antimalarial resistance among Plasmodium falciparum parasites in postearthquake Haiti.
Of the 108 samples, 107 (99%) had no mutations in the pfcrt gene (wild type; CVMNK haplotype). One sample (HH14) had CQ-resistant mutations at codons M74I, N75E, and K76T (CVIET haplotype). Sixty-four percent of the isolates (69) had no mutations in pfdhfr, 35% (38) had a S108N mutation, and one isolate (HH14) carried N51I, C59R, and S108N mutations. For pfdhps, 107 (99%) of samples were wild type, and one sample (HH14) had mutations at codons S436F and A437G. Finally, for pfmdr1, samples that could be genotyped had a single Y184F mutation and were wild type at all other interrogated loci (Table 1).
Table 1.
Prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum drug-resistant haplotypes among 108 parasites from postearthquake Haiti, 2010
| No. of Samples | Pfcrt haplotype | Freq. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C72S | 73 | M74I | N75E | K76T | ||
| 107 | C | V | M | N | K | 0.99 |
| 1† | C | V | I* | E | T | 0.01 |
| 108 | 1.00 | |||||
| No. of samples | Pfdhfr haplotype | |||||
| C50R | N51I | C59R | S108N | I164L | Freq. | |
| 69 | C | N | C | S | I | 0.64 |
| 38 | C | N | C | N | I | 0.35 |
| 1† | C | I | R | N | I | 0.01 |
| 108 | 1.00 | |||||
| No. of samples | Pfdhps haplotype | |||||
| S436F | A437G | K540E | A581G | A613S/T | Freq. | |
| 107 | S | A | K | A | A | 0.99 |
| 1† | F | G | K | A | A | 0.01 |
| 108 | 1.00 | |||||
| No. of samples | Pfmdr1 haplotype | |||||
| N86Y | Y184F | Freq. | ||||
| 108 | N | F | 1.00 | |||
| 108 | 1.00 | |||||
Amino acid changes are given in bold.
Same isolate (HH14).
For structure analysis and phylogenetic tree construction, we used neutral microsatellite loci (Table 2), and excluded samples that had multiple alleles for at least one neutral microsatellite locus (N = 4) and samples that failed to amplify at three or more neutral microsatellite loci (N = 2). An UPGMA-based dendrogram revealed that the single CQ- and SP-resistant isolate was genetically distinct from all other parasites collected in this study (Figure 2 ).
Table 2.
Heterozygosity for seven neutral microsatellites among parasites collected from symptomatic malaria case patients in Haiti, 2010
| Chromosome | 6 | 4 | 10 | 12 | 6 | 2 | 3 |
| Marker name | TA1 | Polyα | PfPK2 | TA109 | 2490 | C2M34 | C3M69 |
| No. of alleles | 5 | 9 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 10 | 4 |
| Expected heterozygosity (He) | 0.68 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.65 | 0.48 | 0.82 | 0.46 |
Figure 2.
Hierarchical clustering of parasites collected in Haiti, 2010. Excluded neutral microsatellite loci with missing values. The blue line with asterisk denotes the isolate with highly resistant chloroquine and sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine mutations (HH14).
For population pairwise Fst calculations, we removed isolates with missing values for any microsatellite locus (N = 3). To compare the P. falciparum populations in Haiti to other P. falciparum populations in Central and South America, we then calculated pairwise Fst values in comparison to Haiti, Venezuela, Brazil, Honduras, and Nicaragua populations (Table 3). The Fst results show that the P. falciparum population in Haiti is genetically distinct from all the South American populations analyzed. All Fst values were statistically significant (P value < 0.05).
Table 3.
Population pairwise FST* among isolates collected from Haiti, Brazil, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Venezuela
Among the CQ-sensitive parasites collected in Haiti, analysis using neutral microsatellites in Structure v2.3.3 revealed population substructure with at least five distinct clusters (K = 5) (Figure 3 ).
Figure 3.
Bayesian clustering of 102 isolates in K = 5 clusters collected in Haiti, 2010.
Discussion
In Hispaniola and Central America, north and west of the Panama Canal, P. falciparum remains CQ susceptible, and CQ is one of the drugs used for primary treatment of uncomplicated malaria. Because of almost total global spread of CQ resistance, there remains a concern for the de novo emergence of CQ-resistant alleles or importation and establishment of CQ-resistant parasite populations to these regions. Surprisingly, widespread CQ resistance in Central America and the Caribbean has not occurred in the 55 years since resistance to CQ emerged and spread throughout South America. During the months after the 2010 earthquake, it was not clear whether the influx of emergency-aid workers from various parts of the world would introduce new parasite populations including CQ-resistant parasites.
According to this study, and other reports,26 the prevalence of CQ-resistant mutations has remained very low or is nonexistent in Haiti.8–10 Of the 108 samples that we tested, there was only a single P. falciparum isolate that carried numerous pfcrt, pfdhps, and pfdhfr mutations associated with drug resistance.
All our samples that were successfully sequenced for region 1 of pfmdr1 had a single Y184F mutation in pfmdr1, which is consistent with previous reports of the pfmdr1 Y184F mutation in Haiti.9,27 We conclude that this can be used as a signature of the Haitian P. falciparum population because parasite populations from other parts of the world typically report multiple mutations.
Our finding that 35% of the samples have only a single mutation (S108N) in pfdhfr is similar to reports ranging from 33% to 45% prevalence of the S108N mutation in specimens collected in 2007 and 2010 to 2012.27,28 The remainders of the parasite samples were wildtype for pfdhfr except for specimen HH14. The S108N mutation in pfdhfr is frequently selected when SP is first used and can confer low-level resistance to pyrimethamine.29,30 However, parasites carrying a single pfdhfr S108N mutation, although resistant to pyrimethamine in vitro, are not likely to carry an increased risk of treatment failure with SP.29–32 In addition, we did not find any sulfadoxine-resistant mutations in pfdhps, with the exception of those reported for HH14, consistent with reports of no pfdhps in mutations in a study from Carter and others.28 Therefore, this single isolate with a CVIET-CQ-resistant haplotype, triple pfdhfr mutations, and double pfdhps mutations differs greatly from all the other specimens in our study and from the majority of specimens in other recent reports from Haiti.7,8,27,28 This pattern of drug-resistant mutations is reminiscent of P. falciparum pfcrt-CVIET populations found in sub-Saharan Africa and southeast Asia.
Researchers have used other polymorphic markers, such as pfmsp1 and pfmsp2, to characterize the population structure of parasites in Haiti.33 We used neutral microsatellites to analyze the population structure of Haitian isolates collected during 2010 in Jacmel, Ranquitte, and areas peripheral to Port-au-Prince for evidence of autochthonous evolution of CQ and SP resistance. Our analysis of Haitian parasite isolates suggested that there was evidence of population substructure with up to five distinct clusters. Furthermore, calculated pairwise Fst values indicate that the parasite populations in Haiti are distinct from others in South America, indicating that these are established or residual populations, as opposed to recent introductions to Haiti. These results provide no evidence of importation and establishment of new populations of P. falciparum parasites during the postearthquake period, with the exception of HH14. On the basis of the neutral microsatellite haplotype analysis and the pattern of drug-resistant mutations of this single isolate, we think that the CQ-resistant mutation did not arise in Haiti. The data instead suggests that this isolate was likely imported into Haiti, perhaps during the chaotic conditions and outside population movements occurring immediately postearthquake. Whether this or any of the other CQ-resistant haplotypes identified by Londono and others6 or Gharbi and others7 can be or are being transmitted in Haiti now or in the past cannot be answered at this time. However, given our data and that of others on pfcrt haplotypes and the ubiquitous use of CQ in Haiti, it is unlikely such transmission is efficiently taking place on Hispaniola.8–10
One limitation of this study is that the samples used were all collected from a single, limited geographical region—areas within and surrounding Port-au-Prince. Therefore, they were not representative of all the departments in Haiti. Nevertheless, in previous studies.26 The samples used were collected from different sites in multiple departments in Haiti, and the results obtained were concordant with those of this study.
Understanding the molecular profile of malaria parasites from Haiti is important for molecular surveillance and drug-treatment policies. These policies have typically relied on in vivo efficacy studies, which are extremely difficult to conduct in low-endemic settings. Molecular surveillance for drug resistance in Central American countries with low malaria transmission has become increasingly common and useful for characterizing local parasite populations.34 Thus, our study has important implications for drug policy in the region. Fortunately, our findings suggest, as in Honduras and Nicaragua, a nonexistent or a very low prevalence of CQ-resistant alleles in Haiti.3,4 This supports the current recommendations to use CQ as first-line treatment, while emphasizing the need for continued molecular monitoring for the possible emergence and expansion or introduction and expansion of antimalarial-resistant parasite populations.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank the study participants for their willingness to participate in this study. We thank all the study staff and Ministry of Health for supporting this study.
Footnotes
Financial support: Lindsay Carol Morton was supported by the CDC Emerging Infectious Disease Fellowship administered through the American Public Health Laboratories. Sheila Akinyi Okoth was respectfully supported by the American Society of Microbiology/CDC postdoctoral fellowship. We thank the Atlanta Research and Education Foundation for partial funding support.
Authors' addresses: Lindsay Carol Morton, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, and University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, E-mail: lmorton@umaryland.edu. Curtis Huber, Sean Griffing, Naomi Lucchi, Michelle A. Chang, Venkatachalam Udhayakumar, and John W. Barnwell, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, E-mails: cwh7@cdc.gov, emx7@cdc.gov, frd9@cdc.gov, aup6@cdc.gov, vxu0@cdc.gov, and wzb3@cdc.gov. Sheila Akinyi Okoth and Dragan Ljolje, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, and Atlanta Research and Education Foundation, Decatur, GA, E-mails: jyo3@cdc.gov and wou3@cdc.gov. Jacques Boncy, Laboratoire National de Santé Publique (LNSP), Ministère de la Santé Publique et de la Population (MSPP), Port-au-Prince, Haiti, E-mail: jboncy2001@yahoo.fr. Roland Oscar, Ministry of Health, Port-au-Prince, Haiti, E-mail: roroscar@yahoo.fr. David Townes, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, E-mail: townesd@u.washington.edu. Meredith McMorrow, Influenza Program, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention South Africa, Pretoria, Republic of South Africa, E-mail: bwe3@cdc.gov.
References
- 1.Lindo JF, Bryce JH, Ducasse MB, Howitt C, Barrett DM, Morales JL, Ord R, Burke M, Chiodini PL, Sutherland CJ. Plasmodium malariae in Haitian refugees, Jamaica. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:931–933. doi: 10.3201/eid1306.061227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) Situation of Malaria in the Region of the Americas, 2000–2012. 2013. http://www2.paho.org/HQ/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=9663:report-on-the-situation-of-malaria-in-the-americas-2012&catid=1617:malaria-statistics-maps&Itemid=2049&lang=fr Available at. Accessed March 11, 2016.
- 3.Sridaran S, Rodriguez B, Soto AM, De Oliveira AM, Udhayakumar V. Molecular analysis of chloroquine and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance-associated alleles in Plasmodium falciparum isolates from Nicaragua. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014;90:840–845. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.13-0214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mejia Torres RE, Banegas EI, Mendoza M, Diaz C, Bucheli STM, Fontecha GA, Alam MT, Goldman I, Udhayakumar V, Zambrano JON. Efficacy of chloroquine for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Honduras. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013;88:850–854. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.12-0671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Duverseau YT, Magloire R, Zevallos-Ipenza A, Rogers HM, Nguyen-Dinh P. Monitoring of chloroquine sensitivity of Plasmodium falciparum in Haiti, 1981–1983. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1986;35:459–464. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1986.35.459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Londono BL, Eisele TP, Keating J, Bennett A, Chattopadhyay C, Heyliger G, Mack B, Rawson I, Vely JF, Désinor O, Krogstad DJ. Chloroquine-resistant haplotype Plasmodium falciparum parasites, Haiti. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:735–740. doi: 10.3201/eid1505.081063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gharbi M, Pillai DR, Lau R, Hubert V, Khairnar K, Existe A, Kendjo E, Dahlström S, Guérin PJ, Le Bras J. Chloroquine-resistant malaria in travelers returning from Haiti after 2010 earthquake. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18:1346–1349. doi: 10.3201/eid1808.111779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Neuberger A, Zhong K, Kain KC, Schwartz E. Lack of evidence for chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria, Leogane, Haiti. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18:1487–1489. doi: 10.3201/eid1809.120605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Elbadry MA, Existe A, Victor YS, Memnon G, Fukuda M, Dame JB, Yowell CA, Okech BA. Survey of Plasmodium falciparum multidrug resistance-1 and chloroquine resistance transporter alleles in Haiti. Malar J. 2013;12:426. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-12-426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Okech BA, Existe A, Romain JR, Memnon G, Saint Victor Y, Beau De Rochars MB, Fukuda M. Therapeutic efficacy of chloroquine for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum in Haiti after many decades of its use. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;92:541–545. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Townes D, Existe A, Boncy J, Magloire R, Vely JF, Amsalu R, De Tavernier M, Muigai J, Hoibak S, Albert M, McMorrow M, Slutsker L, Kachur SP, Chang M. Malaria survey in post-earthquake Haiti: 2010. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012;86:29–31. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.11-0431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Snounou G, Viriyakosol S, Zhu XP, Jarra W, Pinheiro L, do Rosario VE, Thaithong S, Brown KN. High sensitivity of detection of human malaria parasties by the use of nested polymerase chain reaction. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1993;61:315–320. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(93)90077-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Anderson TJ, Haubold B, Williams JT, Estrada-Franco JG, Richardson L, Mollinedo R, Bockarie M, Mokili J, Mharakurwa S, French N, Whitworth J, Velez ID, Brockman AH, Nosten F, Ferreira MU, Day KP. Microsatellite markers reveal a spectrum of population structures in the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Mol Biol Evol. 2000;17:1467–1482. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Anderson TJ, Su XZ, Bockarie M, Lagog M, Day KP. Twelve microsatellite markers for characterization of Plasmodium falciparum from finger-prick blood samples. Parasitology. 1999;119:113–125. doi: 10.1017/s0031182099004552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.McCollum AM, Mueller K, Villegas L, Udhayakumar V, Escalante AA. Common origin and fixation of Plasmodium falciparum dhfr and dhps mutations associated with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance in a low-transmission area in South America. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51:2085–2091. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01228-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dieringer D, Schlötterer C. Microsatellite analyzer (MSA): a platform independent analysis tool for large microsatellite data sets. Mol Ecol Notes. 2003;3:167–169. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tateno Y, Nei M, Tajima F. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. I. Distantly related species. J Mol Evol. 1982;18:387–404. doi: 10.1007/BF01840887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Felsenstein J. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.6. 2005. http://evolution.genetics.washington.edu/phylip/getme.html Available at. Accessed March 11, 2016.
- 19.Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics. 2003;164:1567–1587. doi: 10.1093/genetics/164.4.1567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000;155:945–959. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.2.945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software. Mol Ecol. 2005;14:2611–2620. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Larrañaga N, Mejía RE, Hormaza JI, Montoya A, Soto A, Fontecha GA. Genetic structure of Plasmodium falciparum populations across the Honduras-Nicaragua border. Malar J. 2013;12:354. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-12-354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Griffing S, Syphard L, Sridaran S, McCollum AM, Mixson-Hayden T, Vinayak S, Villegas L, Barnwell JW, Escalante AA, Udhayakumar V. pfmdr1 amplification and fixation of pfcrt chloroquine resistance alleles in Plasmodium falciparum in Venezuela. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:1572–1579. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01243-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Griffing SM, Viana GMR, Mixson-Hayden T, Sridaran S, Alam MT, de Oliveira AM, Barnwell JW, Escalante AA, Povoa MM, Udhayakumar V. Historical shifts in Brazilian P. falciparum population structure and drug resistance alleles. PLoS One. 2013;8:e58984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S. Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform Online. 2005;1:47–50. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Charles M, Das S, Daniels R, Kirkman L, Delva GG, Destine R, Escalante A, Villegas L, Daniels NM, Shigyo K, Volkman SK, Pape JW, Golightly LM. Plasmodium falciparum K76T pfcrt gene mutations and parasite population structure, Haiti, 2006–2009. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22:786–793. doi: 10.3201/eid2205.150359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Maïga-Ascofaré O, Le Bras J, Mazmouz R, Renard E, Falcão S, Broussier E, Bustos D, Randrianarivelojosia M, Omar SA, Aubouy A, Lepère J-F, Jean-François V, Djimdé AA, Clain J. Adaptive differentiation of Plasmodium falciparum populations inferred from single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) conferring drug resistance and from neutral SNPs. J Infect Dis. 2010;202:1095–1103. doi: 10.1086/656142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Carter TE, Warner M, Mulligan CJ, Existe A, Victor YS, Memnon G, Boncy J, Oscar R, Fukuda MM, Okech BA. Evaluation of dihydrofolate reductase and dihydropteroate synthetase genotypes that confer resistance to sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine in Plasmodium falciparum in Haiti. Malar J. 2012;11:275. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-11-275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Plowe CV, Kublin JG, Doumbo OK. P. falciparum dihydrofolate reductase and dihydropteroate synthase mutations: epidemiology and role in clinical resistance to antifolates. Drug Resist Updat. 1998;1:389–396. doi: 10.1016/s1368-7646(98)80014-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cortese JF, Plowe CV. Antifolate resistance due to new and known Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase mutations expressed in yeast. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1998;94:205–214. doi: 10.1016/s0166-6851(98)00075-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Peterson DS, Walliker D, Wellems TE. Evidence that a point mutation in dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase confers resistance to pyrimethamine in falciparum malaria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1988;85:9114–9118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.23.9114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Rallón NI, Osorio LE, Giraldo LE. Lack of an association between the ASN-108 mutation in the dihydrofolate reductase gene and in vivo resistance to sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine in Plasmodium falciparum. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999;61:245–248. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1999.61.245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Londono-Renteria B, Eisele TP, Keating J, Bennett A, Krogstad DJ. Genetic diversity in the merozoite surface protein 1 and 2 genes of Plasmodium falciparum from the Artibonite Valley of Haiti. Acta Trop. 2012;121:6–12. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2011.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Jovel IT, Mejía RE, Banegas E, Piedade R, Alger J, Fontecha G, Ferreira PE, Veiga MI, Enamorado IG, Bjorkman A, Ursing J. Drug resistance associated genetic polymorphisms in Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax collected in Honduras, Central America. Malar J. 2011;10:376. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-10-376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.






