Table 2.
Trait | QTL peak position (LG, cM) |
Peak LOD |
1.5-LOD CI (cM) |
2-LOD CI (cM) |
Additive effect (SE)1 |
Dominance deviation (SE) |
%Variance explained2 |
Relative homozygous effect3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Petal length (mm) | 1, 11.1 | 77.91 | (8.5–12.1) | (8.1–12.1) | 0.37 (0.03) | −0.05 (0.03) | 26.90 | 0.41 |
2, 37.8 | 41.31 | (36.9–38.8) | (31.1–39) | 0.23 (0.03) | 0.24 (0.04) | 18.66 | 0.26 | |
7, 23.5 | 41.11 | (21.8–26.4) | (21.8–27.5) | 0.26 (0.03) | 0.02 (0.04) | 14.88 | 0.30 | |
Petal width (mm) | 1, 2.8 | 15.87 | (0–6.5) | (0–10.3) | 0.12 (0.02) | −0.01 (0.03) | 6.11 | 0.16 |
2, 32.1 | 69.68 | (30.6–32.9) | (30.6–32.9) | 0.2 (0.02) | 0.16 (0.02) | 31.36 | 0.26 | |
6, 4.9 | 17.19 | (3.2–12) | (2.9–14.2) | 0.1 (0.02) | −0.03 (0.03) | 6.10 | 0.13 | |
7, 22.9 | 55.03 | (21.8–24.9) | (21.8–24.9) | 0.19 (0.02) | 0.01 (0.02) | 18.74 | 0.24 | |
8, 14.2 | 7.46 | (6.2–22) | (5.5–22) | 0.05 (0.02) | −0.01 (0.03) | 2.10 | 0.07 | |
Median sepal length (mm) |
1, 9 | 31.37 | (7.7–12.1) | (7.4–14.2) | 0.19 (0.02) | 0 (0.02) | 22.40 | 0.90 |
3, 30.9 | 3.62 | (0–34.5) | (0–38) | 0.05 (0.02) | 0.01 (0.03) | 2.52 | 0.25 | |
Lateral sepal length (mm) |
1, 9 | 25.95 | (8.1–15.3) | (7.7–16.4) | 0.18 (0.02) | −0.02 (0.02) | 15.94 | 0.95 |
2, 37.8 | 8.25 | (35.9–43.5) | (34.6–43.5) | 0.09 (0.02) | 0.1 (0.02) | 6.79 | 0.47 | |
Median stamen length (mm) |
1, 11.1 | 5.99 | (0.1–15.8) | (0–16.4) | 0.05 (0.01) | −0.01 (0.01) | 4.58 | 0.29 |
2, 43.5 | 4.38 | (36.5–43.5) | (34.6–43.5) | 0.04 (0.01) | 0.04 (0.01) | 3.72 | 0.26 | |
6, 7 | 29.20 | (4.9–8.7) | (4.3–8.7) | −0.1 (0.01) | 0.01 (0.01) | 14.67 | −0.57 | |
7, 8 | 49.96 | (3.8–10.9) | (3–10.9) | 0.12 (0.01) | −0.01 (0.01) | 23.91 | 0.70 | |
8, 26 | 4.91 | (19–31.9) | (16.8–35.2) | 0.03 (0.01) | 0.01 (0.01) | 2.03 | 0.20 | |
Lateral stamen length (mm) |
1, 4.9 | 5.36 | (0–11.5) | (0–12.1) | 0.05 (0.01) | −0.01 (0.02) | 3.48 | 0.30 |
2, 37.1 | 18.58 | (31.1–42.1) | (29.8–43) | 0.09 (0.01) | 0.06 (0.01) | 11.45 | 0.51 | |
6, 2 | 26.85 | (0.5–7.9) | (0.3–8.7) | −0.1 (0.01) | −0.01 (0.01) | 14.14 | −0.61 | |
7, 23.5 | 22.13 | (2.1–26.6) | (1.9–27.5) | 0.09 (0.01) | −0.01 (0.01) | 12.45 | 0.52 | |
8, 28.4 | 4.52 | (16.8–31.9) | (11.7–34.8) | 0.04 (0.01) | 0.01 (0.02) | 3.04 | 0.26 | |
Style + gynoecium length (mm) |
1, 9 | 12.88 | (0–16.4) | (0–16.6) | 0.1 (0.01) | 0.01 (0.02) | 9.98 | 0.65 |
7, 0 | 3.82 | (0–8.8) | (0–10.6) | −0.05 (0.01) | −0.05 (0.02) | 4.01 | −0.34 | |
Ovule number | 1, 0 | 4.83 | (0–7.4) | (0–9.1) | 0.73 (0.16) | 0.1 (0.22) | 3.52 | −0.19 |
7, 14 | 8.44 | (4.3–20.9) | (2.4–21.6) | −0.92 (0.16) | 0.24 (0.21) | 5.98 | 0.24 | |
Pollen number | 2, 34.6 | 7.25 | (15.9–38.2) | (8.6–41.4) | 1479 (297) | 159 (415) | 6.08 | 0.09 |
6, 2.9 | 5.98 | (0–13.4) | (0–15.5) | 1374 (309) | 403 (415) | 4.12 | 0.09 | |
7, 1.9 | 13.31 | (0–6.5) | (0–8.2) | 2193 (293) | −213.8 (401.44) | 9.36 | 0.14 | |
Leaf number at flowering |
1, 22.2 | 21.84 | (20.8–26.4) | (19.8–27.4) | −2.55 (0.29) | −0.1 (0.39) | 18.57 | |
3, 23 | 3.48 | (11.1–30.8) | (8.5–45.4) | −0.86 (0.31) | −0.21 (0.41) | 4.44 | ||
4, 38.1 | 3.28 | (34.3–42.5) | (33.1–42.5) | −0.85 (0.31) | −0.4 (0.41) | 3.84 | ||
5, 50 | 23.22 | (46.9–54.1) | (46.1–54.1) | −2.59 (0.28) | 0.19 (0.38) | 12.38 | ||
Days to flowering | 1, 1.1 | 3.77 | (0–12.1) | (0–13.9) | −0.98 (0.25) | −0.23 (0.34) | 3.19 | |
3, 24.5 | 13.90 | (13.7–30.8) | (13.1–30.8) | −1.97 (0.25) | −0.17 (0.33) | 10.38 | ||
5, 42.1 | 3.57 | (17.5–54.1) | (17.5–54.1) | −1.08 (0.26) | −0.04 (0.34) | 3.03 | ||
Homeotic floral aberrations |
1, 22.2 | 4.23 | (16.6–41.3) | (15.8–45.3) | 0.10 (0.03) | −0.10 (0.04) | 4.12 | |
2, 41.4 | 5.50 | (37.8–41.4) | (37.1–43.5) | 0.15 (0.03) | −0.09 (0.04) | 2.47 | ||
6, 0 | 3.49 | (0–7.2) | (0–37.2) | −0.13(0.03) | −0.02 (0.04) | 1.03 | ||
7, 3.8 | 28.43 | (0–4.6) | (0–4.6) | −0.34(0.03) | −0.14 (0.04) | 20.35 |
Additive effect: half the mean phenotypic difference between homozygotes for the C. grandiflora allele and homozygotes for the C. rubella allele.
Per cent F2 phenotypic variance explained by QTL.
Homozygous additive effect (2a) relative to mean phenotypic difference between C. grandiflora and C. rubella for traits that differ significantly between C. grandiflora and C. rubella.