Abstract
Background:
Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is commonly used to manage postoperative pain and facilitate early mobilization after major intra-abdominal surgery. Evidence also suggests that regional anesthesia/analgesia may be associated with improved survival after cancer surgery. Here, we describe factors associated with TEA at the time of radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer and its association with both short- and long-term outcomes in routine clinical practice.
Methods:
All patients undergoing RC in the province of Ontario between 2004 and 2008 were identified using the Ontario Cancer Registry (OCR). Modified Poisson regression was used to describe factors associated with epidural use, while a Cox proportional hazards model describes associations between survival and TEA use.
Results:
Over the five-year study period, 1628 patients were identified as receiving a RC, 54% (n=887) of whom received TEA. Greater anesthesiologist volume (lowest volume providers RR=0.85, 95% CI 0.75–0.96) and male sex (female sex RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.79–0.99) were independently associated with greater use of TEA. Improved short-term outcomes were not associated with TEA use. In multivariate analysis, TEA was not associated with cancer-specific survival (HR 1.02 [95% CI 0.87–1.19]; p=0.804) or overall survival (HR 0.91 [95% CI 0.80–1.03; p=0.136]).
Conclusions:
In routine clinical practice, 54% of RC patients received TEA in routine and its use was associated with anesthesiologist provider volume. After controlling for patient, disease, and provider variables, we were unable to demonstrate any effect on either short- or long-term outcomes at the time of RC.











