Skip to main content
mSphere logoLink to mSphere
. 2016 Oct 5;1(5):e00165-16. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00165-16

Versatility of Biofilm Matrix Molecules in Staphylococcus epidermidis Clinical Isolates and Importance of Polysaccharide Intercellular Adhesin Expression during High Shear Stress

Carolyn R Schaeffer a, Tra-My N Hoang a, Craig M Sudbeck a, Malik Alawi b, Isaiah E Tolo c, D Ashley Robinson c, Alexander R Horswill d, Holger Rohde e, Paul D Fey a,
Editor: Sarah E F D'Oraziof
PMCID: PMC5064449  PMID: 27747298

Staphylococcus epidermidis is a leading cause of infections related to biomaterials, mostly due to their ability to form biofilm. Biofilm accumulation mechanisms vary, including those that are dependent on specific proteins, environmental DNA (eDNA), or polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA). We found that those isolates obtained from high-shear environments, such as the lumen of a catheter, are more likely to produce PIA-mediated biofilms than those isolates obtained from a low-shear biomaterial-related infection. This suggests that PIA functions as a mechanism that is protective against shear flow. Finally, we performed selection experiments documenting the heterogeneity of biofilm accumulation molecules that function in the absence of PIA, further documenting the biofilm-forming potential of S. epidermidis.

KEYWORDS: accumulation-associated protein, Staphylococcus epidermidis, biofilms, catheter-associated infections, polysaccharide intercellular adhesin

ABSTRACT

Staphylococcus epidermidis is a leading cause of hospital-associated infections, including those of intravascular catheters, cerebrospinal fluid shunts, and orthopedic implants. Multiple biofilm matrix molecules with heterogeneous characteristics have been identified, including proteinaceous, polysaccharide, and nucleic acid factors. Two of the best-studied components in S. epidermidis include accumulation-associated protein (Aap) and polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA), produced by the enzymatic products of the icaADBC operon. Biofilm composition varies by strain as well as environmental conditions, and strains producing PIA-mediated biofilms are more robust. Clinically, biofilm-mediated infections occur in a variety of anatomical sites with diverse physiological properties. To test the hypothesis that matrix composition exhibits niche specificity, biofilm-related genetic and physical properties were compared between S. epidermidis strains isolated from high-shear and low-shear environments. Among a collection of 105 clinical strains, significantly more isolates from high-shear environments carried the icaADBC operon than did those from low-shear settings (43.9% versus 22.9%, P < 0.05), while there was no significant difference in the presence of aap (77.2% versus 75.0%, P > 0.05). Additionally, a significantly greater number of high-shear isolates were capable of forming biofilm in vitro in a microtiter assay (82.5% versus 45.8%, P < 0.0001). However, even among high-shear clinical isolates, less than half contained the icaADBC locus; therefore, we selected for ica-negative variants with increased attachment to abiotic surfaces to examine PIA-independent biofilm mechanisms. Sequencing of selected variants identified substitutions capable of enhancing biofilm formation in multiple genes, further highlighting the heterogeneity of S. epidermidis biofilm molecules and mechanisms.

IMPORTANCE Staphylococcus epidermidis is a leading cause of infections related to biomaterials, mostly due to their ability to form biofilm. Biofilm accumulation mechanisms vary, including those that are dependent on specific proteins, environmental DNA (eDNA), or polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA). We found that those isolates obtained from high-shear environments, such as the lumen of a catheter, are more likely to produce PIA-mediated biofilms than those isolates obtained from a low-shear biomaterial-related infection. This suggests that PIA functions as a mechanism that is protective against shear flow. Finally, we performed selection experiments documenting the heterogeneity of biofilm accumulation molecules that function in the absence of PIA, further documenting the biofilm-forming potential of S. epidermidis.

INTRODUCTION

Staphylococcus epidermidis is among the most abundant species associated with the human skin microbiome (1, 2). Although its function in the context of this community is not well defined, its proximity to the epithelial layers facilitates colonization of indwelling medical devices, including intravascular catheters, orthopedic prosthetic devices, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunts (3). Due to this association with foreign bodies, S. epidermidis is the third most common cause of hospital-acquired infections and the number one cause of primary bacteremia (4). In contrast to Staphylococcus aureus, which produces an abundance of toxins, adherence factors, and cytolysins, the primary mechanism through which S. epidermidis evades the immune response is production of biofilm (5). Staphylococcal biofilms are multicellular aggregates surrounded by self-produced matrix materials that are functionally resistant to antibiotics (6) and components of the immune system (7). Therefore, current modalities to treat S. epidermidis-mediated biomaterial infections often necessitate removal of colonized devices and intensive antibiotic therapy, causing significant patient morbidity.

Recent studies of cellular organization within S. aureus biofilms have identified at least four distinct developmental steps, including adherence, multiplication, exodus, and maturation (8). Factors mediating S. aureus biofilm formation and/or structure, including adherence factors, extracellular DNA (eDNA) release, polysaccharide production, nuclease/protease activity, and phenol-soluble modulin factors, have been extensively studied and recently reviewed (913). Polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA) was the first identified staphylococcal factor with a major function in biofilm accumulation (1416). PIA is composed of repeating units of β-1,6-linked N-acetylglucosamine residues and is produced by the protein products of the icaADBC operon (14). Genetic regulation of icaADBC, and subsequent synthesis of PIA (or poly-N-acetyl glucosamine [PNAG], as it is referred to in S. aureus [17]), is governed by multiple direct and indirect transcriptional regulators, including IcaR, σB, and SarA (18, 19). icaADBC appears to be ubiquitously present in S. aureus strains; however, recent evidence suggests that PIA/PNAG is preferentially expressed in methicillin-susceptible isolates of S. aureus (2024) but repressed in those that exhibit methicillin resistance mediated by mecA (25). In contrast to S. aureus, not all strains of S. epidermidis carry the icaADBC operon. Several studies have indicated that S. epidermidis strains isolated from nosocomial environments or biomaterial-associated infections are more likely to carry icaADBC than those isolated from the skin of healthy individuals (2631). In addition, among the strains that carry the icaADBC operon, some (e.g., strain 1457 [32, 33]) constitutively produce copious amounts of PIA and subsequent biofilm in vitro, whereas others such as CSF41498 (34) require salt or ethanol to induce icaADBC transcription and PIA synthesis.

Although many S. epidermidis strains causing biomaterial-related infections carry icaADBC, it is clear that protein-based matrices also have the ability to mediate biofilm accumulation and cause infection (30). In fact, certain strains have been shown to switch between PIA-dependent and protein-dependent biofilm matrices during prolonged infection (35). The two best studied among these biofilm proteins are accumulation-associated protein (Aap) and extracellular matrix binding protein (Embp) (36, 37). While these matrix components have unique structural characteristics, PIA-, Embp-, and Aap-dependent S. epidermidis biofilms are all resistant to phagocytosis due to their ability to inhibit NF-κB activation and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) production (38, 39). In general, staphylococcal biofilms skew the immune response, generating alternatively activated macrophages that promote a fibrotic rather than bactericidal response, thereby facilitating bacterial persistence (7, 40, 41).

In addition to the variety and variability of biofilm molecules, environmental conditions also affect biofilm properties (34, 38, 4247). Though mechanistic details are lacking, multiple investigators have reported that PIA production is enhanced in fluid shear settings (42, 45), which may facilitate survival under certain in vivo growth conditions. For example, biofilm communities on a heart valve or central venous catheter (CVC) are subject to constant fluid movement and must be able to withstand high shear flow. Typical shear stress levels present in capillaries and venules range between 0.05 and 4 Pa, whereas levels in catheter lumens range between 0.02 and 3 Pa (45, 48, 49). In contrast, prosthetic joints and CSF shunts are exposed to minimal fluid shear at less-frequent intervals.

Numerous investigators have attempted to correlate the presence of icaADBC or aap with the virulence of isolates, yielding differing results (34, 47, 5056). Many of these studies classify strains as either commensals/contaminants (isolated from skin) or infectious (isolated from blood or biomaterial). These analyses are complicated by the fact that most S. epidermidis infections are caused by the patient’s own flora (5759). Examining “infectious” isolates as a whole may therefore yield highly variable and difficult-to-interpret results.

The heterogeneity of S. epidermidis strains, the variety of biofilm-mediated infections, and the knowledge that protein-dependent biofilms are less robust under shear flow conditions than those containing PIA (6) led us to hypothesize that S. epidermidis isolates from high-shear environments (e.g., CVCs) would more often carry icaADBC and produce more-robust PIA-dependent biofilm than would those from low-shear environments (e.g., prosthetic joints and CSF shunts). We addressed this and subsequent issues by examining strains isolated from clinical cases, grouped according to infection site. Additionally, we examined mutations that enhanced biofilm formation in an icaADBC-negative background.

RESULTS

Genetic diversity of clinical isolates.

A total of 105 S. epidermidis patient isolates were retrospectively collected from Nebraska Medicine and placed into one of two groups according to the infection site. High-shear strains (n = 57) were isolated from blood cultures of patients with concomitant positive catheter tip cultures. Low-shear isolates (n = 48) were primarily from cases of orthopedic device failure necessitating explantation (n = 33) and cerebrospinal fluid shunt infections (n = 13). To test whether high- and low-shear populations were skewed toward specific genetic backgrounds, the sequence types (STs) of 88 isolates (44 from each shear group) were determined by multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and assigned to genetic clusters (GCs) (60, 61). The most common STs in both high- and low-shear populations were ST2 and ST5, although at least 50% of the strains in both shear groups belonged to STs other than ST2 and ST5 (Fig. 1A). GC analysis found that most isolates were identified as GC1, GC5, or GC6 (Fig. 1B); however, chi-square analysis demonstrated no statistical significance with respect to the results of comparisons of high- or low-shear isolates with specific GCs. These findings demonstrate that the clinical isolates examined in our study were from diverse backgrounds and provide further evidence that a wide variety of S. epidermidis strains are capable of causing disease.

FIG 1 .

FIG 1 

Population characteristics of clinical isolates. MLST was performed on 88 clinical isolates (low shear, n = 44; high shear, n = 44). (A and B) Distribution of clinical isolate sequence types (A) and genetic clusters (B) grouped by shear type. “Other” denotes STs represented by a single isolate. (C) agr type determined by PCR for 105 clinical isolates, grouped by shear type.

Previous work demonstrated that the function of Aap varies based on proteolytic cleavage (37). Processing can occur via proteases produced by the host or the bacterium or both. In the staphylococci, the agr quorum sensing system regulates production of secreted proteases (6265). Polymorphisms within the agr locus distinguish 3 S. epidermidis agr types (66, 67). To examine the possibility that specific agr types were associated with particular groups of clinical isolates, we determined the agr types of the clinical strains (Fig. 1C). agr type I was the most prevalent in both groups, representing 56% and 42% of the overall isolates from the high- and low-shear groups, respectively. A total of 40% of the isolates in both groups were type II. Only 11 isolates in total were agr type III; although there was a trend suggesting that agr type III was more extensively represented in the low-shear group (4% of the high-shear and 19% of the low-shear strains), more isolates would need to be assessed to determine the statistical significance of this observation. In conclusion, these studies demonstrated that there is not a significant difference in agr type between the high-shear and low-shear clinical isolate groups.

The ica operon is associated with isolates from high-shear environments.

Genetic screening was used to test all isolates for genes responsible for production of 2 well-characterized biofilm matrix components: the icaADBC operon, which encodes enzymes that synthesize PIA; and aap, encoding Aap. Within the high-shear group (Table 1), 25 (43.9%) isolates contained icaA and 44 (77.2%) were positive for aap. Among the low-shear isolates (Table 2), 11 (22.9%) were icaA positive and 36 (75%) contained aap. Comparisons between shear groups revealed that significantly more isolates in the high-shear group carried the icaADBC operon (P < 0.05), while there was no significant difference between the groups with respect to the presence of aap (P > 0.05).

TABLE 1 .

High-shear clinical isolate characteristicsd

Isolate ID aap Aap ica PIA Biofilma agr type STb GCc
4931 + + + + I 529 1
6540 + + ND I 6 1
6591 + + ND + II 5 6
6609 + + ND + II 5 6
6638 ND ND + I 533 1
6663 ND + + +++ I 7 6
6829 + + + + +++ I 425 6
6850 ND ND + II ND ND
6911 ND ND I 210 6
6973 + + + + I 2 5
7163 + ND + II 17 6
7219 + + ND + II 5 6
7448 + + + + +++ I 7 6
7503 + + ND + II 5 6
7586 + ND + II 5 6
7960 + + + I 81 6
8116 + + + + I 2 5
8144 ND + + ++ II 535 6
8166 ND ND + II 14 1
8183 + + ND II 536 6
8246 ND + + +++ I 22 5
8247 + + ND III 88 1
8302 + + + + + I 22 5
8481 + + + + + I 2 5
8595 + + + + +++ II ND ND
8614 + + + + ++ I 2 5
8635 + + ND + II 5 6
8889 + + + + +++ I 20 1
9193 + + + + I 2 5
9293 + + ND + III ND ND
9676 + + + + ++ I 35 1
9797 + + + + I 2 5
10241 + + ND I 5 6
10351 + + + + + I 2 5
10546 + + ND + II 5 6
10935 + + ND + II 89 1
11038 + + + + +++ II 7 6
B4-11 + + ND II 5 6
B14-11 ND ND II 5 6
B281-11 + + ND + I 2 5
B445-11 + + + + I 2 5
B460-11 + + + + +++ I 7 6
B503-11 + + ND ++ II 5 6
B658-11 + + ND + II 5 6
B818-11 ND + + I 538 3
B922-11 + + ND + I ND ND
B931-11 + + ND + II ND ND
B935-11 + + ND + II 5 6
B983-11 + + ND + II ND ND
B1166-11 ND ND + I 130 6
B1232-11 ND ND I ND ND
B1330-11 + + + + I ND ND
B1508-11 + + + + +++ II ND ND
B1528-11 + ND + I ND ND
B1570-11 ND ND I ND ND
B1711-11 ND ND I ND ND
B1733-11 + + + + +++ I ND ND
a

Biofilm formation compared to S. epidermidis 1457: –, <30%; +, 30% to 59%; ++, 60% to 84%; +++, ≥85%.

b

ST, sequence type determined by MLST.

c

GC, genetic cluster based on Bayesian analysis of population structure (BAPS) of MLST.

d

ND, not determined. In columns 2 to 5, + indicates presence and − indicates absence.

TABLE 2 .

Low-shear clinical isolate characteristicse

Isolate ID Sourcea aap Aap ica PIA Biofilmb agr type STc GCd
4804 CSF ND + ++ I 23 5
4961 BF + + ND III 73 1
5018 BF ND ND I 530 4
5183 BF + ND II 531 3
5387 BF + + + I 2 5
5593 BF + + + + ++ I 2 5
5595 BF + + + + ++ II 17 6
5794 CSF + + ND III 532 1
6076 CSF + + ND III 88 1
6152 CSF + + ND III 294 1
6381 Eye + + ND + II 5 6
6439 CSF + + ND + II 5 6
6802 TC + + ND III 73 1
6836 BF + + + I 2 5
7022 TC + + ND + II 5 6
7109 BF + + ND + III 218 1
7235 TC ND ND + I 256 1
7237 CSF ND ND I 534 4
7327 CSF + + ND + II 5 6
7463 TC + + ND + II 5 6
7486 TC + + ND I 153 6
7613 CSF + + + + ++ I 166 1
7736 CSF ND ND II ND ND
8006 CSF ND ND II ND ND
8099 BF + + ND III 73 1
8111 BF + + ND III 73 1
8364 TC + + ND III 88 1
8500 TC + + ND II 5 6
8571 TC + + ND II 5 6
8890 TC + + + + +++ I 16 1
8899 CSF ND ND I 537 4
9958 BF + + + + + I 16 1
9973 CSF ND ND I ND ND
9987 Eye + + ND + II 5 6
10017 CSF + + ND + II 5 6
10101 BF ND ND I 89 1
10340 CSF + + ND + I 487 6
10413 BF + + + I 2 5
10532 BF + + + + + I 2 5
10596 SF + + ND II 152 1
10734 SF ND ND II 7 6
O15 Expl + + ND + II 5 6
O16 Expl + + ND I 57 6
O50 Expl + + ND ++ II 5 6
O73 Expl ND + + +++ I 9 1
O101 Expl + + ND II 5 6
O135 Expl ND ND + I ND ND
O136 Expl + + ND + II 5 6
a

Blood isolates were from patients with concomitant positive catheter tip culture results. ID, identifier; BF, body fluid other than blood; CSF, cerebral spinal fluid; TC, tissue culture from site of prosthetic joint removal; SF, synovial fluid; Expl, explanted hardware (knee or hip).

b

Biofilm formation compared to S. epidermidis 1457: −, >30%; +, 30% to 59%; ++, 60% to 84%; +++, ≥85%.

c

ST, sequence type determined by MLST.

d

GC, genetic cluster based on BAPS of MLST.

e

ND, not determined. In columns 3 to 6, + indicates presence and − indicates absence.

Production of matrix components.

It was next determined if the presence of aap or icaADBC correlated with synthesis of Aap or PIA, respectively. Accordingly, we performed Western blotting using serum raised against Aap, as well as PIA immunoblotting, to identify matrix components produced by the isolates. Aap was detected by Western blotting in 74 of the 80 aap-positive isolates (92.5%), indicating high concordance between the presence of the gene and protein production (Tables 1 and 2). In contrast, PIA was detected in only 67% (24/36) of the ica-positive isolates (Tables 1 and 2).

Biofilm phenotypes differ between shear groups.

A static microtiter plate assay was used to test the ability of isolates to produce biofilm in vitro. Due to the large number of isolates tested and the inherent variability of the assay, biofilm formation was normalized by comparing it to that of robust biofilm-forming isolate 1457. Biofilm formation was stratified into the following 4 groups based on comparison to strain 1457: negative (–; <30%), slight (+; 30 to 59%), moderate (++, 60 to 84%), and strong (+++; ≥85%). Overall, 34.3% of the isolates were negative for biofilm formation in the static assay, 45.7% showed slight biofilm formation, 8.6% showed moderate biofilm formation, and 10.4% showed strong biofilm formation. Among the isolates in the high-shear group, 17.5% were biofilm negative, 57.9% showed slight biofilm formation, 10.4% showed moderate biofilm formation, and 17.5% showed strong biofilm formation. In the low-shear group, 54.2% of the isolates were biofilm negative, 31.3% showed slight biofilm formation, 10.4% showed moderate biofilm formation, and 4.2% showed strong biofilm formation. Within the high-shear group, 47 strains (82.5%) were biofilm positive (slight/moderate/strong), while less than half of the low-shear isolates (22 of 48, 45.8%) produced biofilm (P < 0.05). Additionally, 14.6% of the low-shear isolates and 24.6% of the high-shear isolates were either moderate or strong biofilm producers (P < 0.05). Similarly, 4.2% of the low-shear and 17.5% of the high-shear isolates were strong biofilm producers (P < 0.05). In summation, there was a significant association between biofilm formation and infection site; those isolates obtained from a proposed high-shear environment produced significantly more biofilm than those isolated from a low-shear infection site. While the exact relationship between biofilm formation in the static assay and in vivo relevance is not clear, our results and those of others (45) have demonstrated that the isolates identified as the strongest biofilm formers (+++) carry the icaADBC operon and produce large amounts of PIA without induction under environmental conditions such as the presence of excess salt or ethanol. Indeed, PIA was detected in all 12 of the isolates that were very strong biofilm producers (Tables 1 and 2). Taken together, these data support the idea of a relationship between constitutive PIA expression and the ability to colonize catheters in a high-shear environment.

icaADBC transcription is induced upon exposure to shear stress.

Our results suggest that the presence of icaADBC and enhanced PIA synthesis may be advantageous in environments that contain high shear stress. Indeed, previous data suggest that, in contrast to wild-type (WT) strain 1457, the 1457 ΔicaADBC strain is unable to form a biofilm in a high-shear flow cell (32). Therefore, to determine whether increased shear induces icaADBC expression, two S. epidermidis clinical isolates, 1457 (high constitutive PIA production) and CSF41498 (inducible PIA production), were grown in convertible flow cells at either low (0.25 ml/min) or high (2 ml/min) shear flow rates. When grown under high-shear flow conditions, icaA transcription was increased 3.0087-fold in 1457 (P < 0.05) and 1.7471-fold in CSF41498 (P < 0.05) compared to growth under low-shear flow conditions (Fig. 2). These data demonstrate that shear flow impacts biofilm formation via induction of genes responsible for PIA synthesis. In addition, this observation may provide a mechanistic explanation for apparent discrepancies between the observation of biofilm formation in vivo and the apparent lack of biofilm formation in static assays and other in vitro assays.

FIG 2 .

FIG 2 

icaA expression increases as shear flow increases. Strain 1457 or CSF41498 biofilms were grown in convertible flow cells at either high (“slow”) or low (“fast”) rates of flow for 24 h at 37°C. Biofilms were harvested, and RNA was purified for qRT-PCR analysis. icaA expression was higher with “fast” flow than with “slow” flow. ***, P < 0.05.

Selection of biofilm-enriched variants.

Within the high-shear group, there were 32 ica-negative strains, of which 65.6% (n = 21) were slight biofilm producers (+) and 3.1% (n = 1) were moderate biofilm producers (++). In fact, it is well documented that many clinical isolates that cause infection lack the icaADBC operon (30, 34, 37, 47, 54, 6870). Therefore, we asked if it would be possible to enrich for variants with increased biofilm formation among the members of a population that are ica negative and, therefore, generally poor biofilm producers. To explore this possibility, tissue culture flasks were inoculated with the PIA-deficient, slight-biofilm-forming 1457 ΔicaADBC strain (referred to here as strain 1457 Δica) (71). Through a series of wash and incubation steps, mutants able to adhere to the flask surface were selected, and after isolation of individual colonies, biofilm-positive variants were identified using microtiter plate assays. Of the 209 isolates tested from 3 separate enrichment experiments, 91 formed significantly more biofilm than the parent strain (1457 Δica) using a static microtiter assay.

Three of the strain 1457 Δica variants, 24c, A1-35, and B5, were selected for further analysis because they showed various degrees of biofilm enhancement, their biofilm phenotypes were stable, and they were isolated from 3 separate enrichment procedures. First, to confirm that increased biofilm formation was not merely a consequence of growth enhancement, growth experiments were performed on the 3 enriched isolates and the 1457 Δica strain. The results confirmed that the enriched isolate growth rate or yield did not differ drastically from that seen with the parent strain (1457 Δica) (Fig. 3A), suggesting the observed biofilm phenotypes were specific to biofilm formation and thus warranted further investigation. To assess the composition of the biofilm matrices, 24-h biofilms were treated with either proteinase K or DNase I (Fig. 3B and C). The parent strain, 1457 Δica, was not affected by treatment with proteinase K or DNase I. DNase I also had no effect on A1-35; however, proteinase K ablated the preformed biofilm. Biofilms of 24c and B5 were decreased to the levels seen with the parent strain following treatment with proteinase K, while DNase I treatment caused the greatest dispersal. These data suggest that the matrix of A1-35 is comprised primarily of protein, while both 24c biofilms and B5 biofilms are eDNA and protein dependent.

FIG 3 .

FIG 3 

Enriched-variant dispersal. (A) Growth analysis in TSB of the 1457Δica, 24c, B5, and A1-35 strains. (B) The 24-h biofilms were treated with enzymes for 2 h and then processed for biofilm formation analysis. (C) Representative images of biofilms following crystal violet staining. Prot K, proteinase K; No Tx, no treatment.

To determine if Aap was involved in the enriched-variant phenotypes, lysate was made from strain 1457 Δaap (72) and transduced into strains 24c, A1-35, and B5. Deletion of aap did not impair biofilm formation in 24c or B5; however, strain A1-35 Δaap biofilm levels were reduced to the level seen with the parent strain, indicating that the enhanced biofilm formation in variant A1-35 was Aap dependent (Fig. 4). This suggests that A1-35 biofilm enrichment is due to alteration of Aap or to factors controlling its expression and/or processing. Although biofilms produced by variants 24c and B5 were disrupted following proteinase K treatment, the results of the transduction experiment indicated that Aap is not responsible for the increased biofilm production in these strains, suggesting that alternative proteinaceous factors are involved.

FIG 4 .

FIG 4 

Deletion of aap negates biofilm enhancement in A1-35. Levels of biofilm formation in enriched variants before and after allelic replacement (aap::tetM) were compared to examine the contribution of Aap to the biofilm phenotype. Biofilm formation in the static microtiter assay was assessed by absorbance at 595 nm following crystal violet staining.

Growth of enriched isolates under fluid shear conditions.

The ability of the variants to grow under shear conditions (10 dyne/cm2) was assessed using a BioFlux microfluidic plate system and automated image acquisition. At 2 h, A1-35 cells were found in clusters with a jagged appearance, while cells of all other strains were located more diffusely across the plate surfaces (Fig. 5). After 8 h, the phenotypes of strains 1457, 1457 Δica, 24c, B5, and A1-35 Δaap were still comparable, while increased cell-cell interactions were apparent in strain A1-35. By 15 h, the effect of PIA production was apparent in strain 1457. Cell aggregation was further increased in strain A1-35, while cells of strains A1-35 Δaap, 24c, and B5 were less able to withstand fluid shear, as evidenced by the presence of bare streaks across the viewing windows. As a consequence of the enhanced intercellular interactions of A1-35, daughter cells remained closely associated for multiple generations. In fact, in time-lapse images, cell clusters appeared to “snowflake,” spreading outward in a manner reminiscent of ice crystal formation. At 20 h after inoculation, fluid flow through the microfluidic channel containing strain 1457 was completely blocked by PIA-mediated biofilm. Variant A1-35 had formed a compact biofilm extending from the edge of the channel, and, to a lesser degree, 24c and B5 cells had started to accumulate along the channel edges. Of note, deletion of aap in strain A1-35 restored the phenotype to that of the parent strain, 1457 Δica. Interestingly, cell accumulation and biofilm formation were most evident at the edges of channels, where fluid shear is decreased; however, the intercellular interactions were not strong enough to allow clustering in the center of the channels. This is in agreement with previous findings indicating that protein-mediated biofilms were not as robust as those containing PIA (32). The flow cell results provide further evidence that the increased biofilm formation of strain A1-35 is Aap dependent, possibly due to an increase in Aap-mediated cell-cell interactions.

FIG 5 .

FIG 5 

1457 and A1-35 form robust biofilms under shear flow conditions. At 2 h after inoculation, A1-35 cells were clustered and had a jagged appearance, while the cells of all other strains were spread more diffusely across the surface. After 8 h, the phenotypes of the 1457, Δica, 24c, B5, and A1-35 Δaap strains were still comparable, while increased cell-cell interactions were apparent in strain A1-35. By 15 h, the effect of PIA production was apparent in strain 1457. A larger cell aggregate had developed in A1-35, while Al-35 Δaap, 24c, and B5 cells were less able to withstand fluid movement, resulting in bare streaks. The enhanced intercellular interactions of strain A1-35 gave the cells an appearance of “snowflaking,” or spreading outward. At 20 h after inoculation, fluid flow through the channel containing strain 1457 was blocked by PIA-mediated biofilm and A1-35 cells had formed a compact biofilm extending from the edge of the channel.

Sequence analysis of biofilm-enriched variants.

Due to abrogation of biofilm formation in A1-35 following introduction of the aap mutation, we hypothesized that the isolate contained changes in aap or factors regulating its expression or processing. DNA sequencing analysis identified the point mutation G1363T in aap, thereby coding for cysteine rather than glycine at residue 455, slightly less than halfway into the L-type lectin domain. Based on phenotypic analysis of variant A1-35, it appears that the substitution increases Aap-dependent interactions between cells. Genetic analysis of variant 24c revealed a single nucleotide change from guanine to adenine, causing the amino acid change L45F in GlcNAc 2-epimerase. GlcNAc 2-epimerase is a highly conserved enzyme (73, 74) responsible for the conversion of GlcNAc to UDP-N-acetylmannosamine (ManNAc) (7476). Finally, the third biofilm-enriched variant, B5, had 2-bp substitutions, resulting in the amino acid changes D498Y and Y497F within the amidase domain of the autolysin AtlE (77).

DISCUSSION

We began this study by assessing population-based questions associated with disease-causing S. epidermidis clinical isolates collected from high-shear and low-shear environments. Overall, we found no biologically significant population-based differences between these groups of isolates in studies employing multilocus sequence typing (MLST) or determination of the agr group. However, several observations deserve notice. Within our isolate population, the most frequent ST was ST5 (n = 26), followed by ST2 (n = 14) and ST7 (n = 5). ST5 contained almost exclusively aap-positive strains (25 of 26), of which 24 produced Aap. Interestingly, none of the strains carried the icaADBC locus. Twenty-five isolates were agr type II, while 1 was type I. High-shear and low-shear environments were equally represented (13 of each), and both shear groups primarily contained isolates that were minimal biofilm producers (+), 1 isolate that was a moderate biofilm producer (++), and 3 strains that did not make biofilm. All ST2 isolates were positive for aap, and, in agreement with previous findings, 13/14 were icaADBC positive (29, 52, 60). All ST2 isolates were agr type I. There were 9 high-shear isolates, among which 7 were minimal biofilm producers (+), 1 was a moderate biofilm producer (++), and 1 was biofilm negative, as well as 5 low-shear isolates, 1 each of minimal (+) and moderate (++) biofilm producers and 3 that were biofilm negative. Juárez-Verdayes et al. (78) observed an association between biofilm composition and strain lineage, as 50% of ST2 biofilms were composed of protein, or of a combination of protein and eDNA, and such biofilms are known to be less robust than those containing primarily PIA. Our findings do not contradict this, as all the ST2 isolates were aap positive, with 13 of 14 producing Aap. Among the 5 ST7 strains, 1 was low shear and had characteristics different from those of the high-shear strains. The low-shear isolate was aap, ica, and biofilm negative and agr type II positive. All high-shear strains produced PIA and were strong biofilm producers (+++), 3 of 4 contained aap, and 3 were agr type I whereas 1 was agr type II.

Regarding genetic cluster analysis, consistent with previous reports, we found that 93% of isolates tested were GC1 or GC5 or GC6 (61, 79). Although trends were noted with respect to specific genetic clusters and high- or low-shear isolates (e.g., for GC1 and high shear, n = 8; for GC1 and low shear, n = 16), none of these associations were statistically significant. However, two previous reports of S. epidermidis isolates from New York and Illinois found an association between GC5 and the presence of icaADBC (61, 79). Our data are consistent with these observations in that 16/17 (94%) of the GC5 isolates in our study carried icaADBC, whereas only 33% of the isolates overall carried this locus.

A total of 76% of the clinical isolates carried aap, and nearly all (93%) of those produced Aap as detected by Western blotting. Aap and its S. aureus homologue, SasG, have both been shown to facilitate binding to host epithelial cells (8082), suggesting a function during colonization. This hypothesis is supported by the high prevalence of aap-positive strains detected in our study. To date, no direct regulators of aap have been identified. In light of our findings, it seems probable that production of Aap in aap-positive isolates is typical and that deviations from this are the exception.

In contrast to our observations regarding Aap, PIA was detected in only two-thirds (24/36) of the ica-positive isolates, which is in agreement with previous findings (83). Among the S. epidermidis isolates, 43.9% of those obtained from a high-shear environment, in contrast to 22.9% of those obtained from a low-shear environment, carried the icaADBC operon. The synthesis of PIA is an energy-intensive process involving multiple proteins and diverts glycolytic substrate away from cell wall synthesis and from pyruvate and subsequent central metabolism. Therefore, it is not surprising that transcription of icaADBC is regulated by multiple factors, including those that are linked to central metabolism (19, 84). Although the great majority of S. aureus strains carry the icaADBC operon, it is rarely synthesized in vitro without induction (22). Furthermore, as documented in these studies, many S. epidermidis isolates that carry the icaADBC operon do not produce detectable PIA or strongly produce (+++) biofilm. Nevertheless, 10 of the 12 isolates that formed biofilm most strongly (+++) from this study were from high-shear environments and all 12 produced detectable PIA. Further flow cell studies demonstrated that increased flow induced icaADBC transcription in two separate strains of S. epidermidis, 1457 and CSF41498. Note that 1457 produces abundant PIA in vitro, whereas CSF41498 requires induction by salt or ethanol (33, 34). Collectively, these data suggest that carriage and subsequent induction of the icaADBC operon are advantageous under conditions of high shear stress such as those found within the lumen of a catheter. Therefore, we propose that one main function of PIA is to protect the biofilm structure and ensure structural integrity under conditions of high shear stress. Furthermore, ill-defined mutations that enhance icaADBC transcription and subsequent PIA synthesis, as described for strain 1457 and for 12 strains in this report, may also enhance the ability of S. epidermidis to colonize and withstand certain shear stress conditions. The factors that mediate phenotypic differences in PIA synthesis between 1457- and CSF41498-like strains are under active investigation.

It is very clear that staphylococcal biofilm accumulation can be mediated by multiple molecules, including polysaccharide, protein, or eDNA. These observations suggest that biofilm accumulation molecules are redundant and that certain accumulation strategies may be selected within certain niches. Highlighting this point, it has been previously demonstrated that the same strain of S. epidermidis that produced biofilm dependent upon different matrix molecules was isolated multiple times from a single patient (35). Regarding PIA synthesis, data from the present study suggest that icaADBC carriage and subsequent induction may be advantageous in niches of high shear stress. However, data exist suggesting that PIA expression is deleterious to colonization of the skin (85). Indeed, although it is unclear how S. epidermidis may acquire icaADBC, Ziebuhr and colleagues and our group independently determined that icaADBC is lost within a population due to chromosomal deletion via recombination of insertion sequence elements (86, 87). Therefore, as it is clear that there are redundancies in biofilm accumulation molecules and variations in the amount of biofilm produced within any given strain, experiments were designed to identify loci responsible for enhancing biofilm formation in a PIA-deficient strain, the 1457 Δica mutant. The genomes were sequenced from three 1457 Δica mutants able to produce significantly more biofilm than the wild-type strain following an enrichment assay. Surprisingly, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis identified only one mutation in strains A1-35 (aap) and 24c (GlcNac 2 epimerase) and two mutations within the same gene in mutant B5 (AtlE). Although it is unclear how any of these mutations function to increase biofilm formation of the 1457 Δica mutant, it is important that multiple mechanisms can be selected to enhance cell aggregation in S. epidermidis. First, the G1363T mutation in aap of A1-35 is found within the lectin domain, which may function in initial adherence to plastic or to other proteins/glycoproteins (72, 82). However, it is difficult to envision how this mutation could facilitate increased cellular interactions as the Zn2+-dependent homophilic bonds occur between the G5-E domains within the B region but not within the lectin binding domain (88, 89). Second, growth inhibition resulting from inactivation of GlcNAc 2-epimerase has been documented in many Gram-positive species, including S. aureus and S. epidermidis (74). Proper regulation of cell wall turnover is critical for cell growth and viability; thus, it seems reasonable to conclude that increased activity of GlcNAc 2-epimerase would also be detrimental. We hypothesize that the point mutation increases the activity of GlcNAc 2-epimerase, thereby increasing cell wall turnover and eDNA release following cell lysis. Indeed, 24c biofilm was almost completely dispersed following DNase I treatment. Finally, we propose that the mutations in the amidase domain of AtlE in B5 may enhance the activity of the enzyme, increasing cell lysis and eDNA release. We are currently investigating whether the observed increased biofilm formation of B5 containing an aap mutation (Fig. 4) is relevant in other relevant biological assays, including animal models of infection. While the events leading to release of eDNA differ between 24c and B5, the two biofilms were dispersed by DNase I and had similar phenotypes in the BioFlux assay, supporting the idea of a shared enhanced biofilm formation mechanism. However, it is important that there was no difference between 24c and B5 with respect to growth yield following 12 h of growth in comparison to the WT results (Fig. 3A), suggesting that if our supposition is correct, increased cell lysis may occur at different stages of growth (biofilm or enhanced stationary phase) instead of occurring during exponential growth in broth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial culture conditions.

The S. epidermidis clinical isolates used in this study are listed in Tables 1 and 2. Other S. epidermidis strains used included 1457 (33) and CSF41498 (34). Staphylococcal strains were cultured in tryptic soy broth (TSB; Becton, Dickinson) or tryptic soy agar (TSA). When appropriate, antibiotics were added to media at a concentration of 10 µg/ml. Unless otherwise stated, cultures were grown aerobically (1:10 media-to-flask ratio, 250 rpm) at 37°C. If not specified, all chemicals and reagents were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO).

Phage propagation and transduction.

The 1457 aap mutation (72) was transferred to biofilm-enriched variants using transducing phage 71 (90) as previously described (91).

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was performed using previously described methodology (92). Briefly, high-molecular-weight DNA encased within agarose plugs was made by combining bacterial suspensions of an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 1.0, lysostaphin (25 µg), and 1% pulsed-field-certified agarose (Bio-Rad, Richmond, VA). Following a 4-h incubation in EC buffer (6 mM Tris hydrochloride, 1 M NaCl, 100 mM EDTA, 0.5% Brij 58, 0.2% deoxycholate, 0.5% sodium lauroyl sarcosine [pH 7.5]) at 37°C, plugs were transferred to ESP buffer (0.5 M EDTA [pH 9.0 to 9.5], 1% sodium lauroyl sarcosine) containing 20 µg proteinase K and incubated overnight at 54°C. Finally, plugs were washed and stored in Tris-EDTA (TE) at 4°C until use. Plugs were digested with SmaI (Thermo Scientific) before incorporation into a 1% agarose gel. The gel was run in 0.5× Tris-borate-EDTA (TBE) in an electrophoresis cell using a CHEF-DR III system (Bio-Rad) and the following parameters: 6 V/cm; initial pulse time, 1 s; final pulse time, 30 s for 22 h at 14°C. Gels were visualized by UV exposure following ethidium bromide staining.

Static biofilm assay.

Microtiter plate assays were performed as described previously (72) based on the procedure of Christensen et al. with modifications (43, 93). Overnight planktonic cultures were diluted 1:100 in fresh TSB. Each well of a 96-well flat-bottom microtiter plate was inoculated with 200 µl, with samples run in triplicate. Plates were incubated statically at 37°C for 24 h. The supernatant was removed, and wells were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Cells were fixed by drying plates at 45°C for 1 h. Adherent cells were stained with 0.4% crystal violet for 15 min, and excess stain was removed by washes in distilled water. Biofilm formation was quantified by measuring the absorbance at 595 nm using a Wallac 1420 multilabel counter (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA). Results presented are from at least 3 independent experiments.

Biofilm dispersal.

Twenty-four-hour biofilms, inoculated and grown as described above, were treated with enzymes for 2 h at 37°C as follows. Medium was removed from wells before the addition of 100 µl of 40 µg/ml DispersinB–PBS (MTA-Kane Biotech Inc., Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada) (94), 100 µg/ml proteinase K (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA)–20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5)–100 mM NaCl, or the corresponding buffers. DNase I requires Mg2+ for maximal activity, so for this treatment, 100 µl of TSB (which contains Mg2+) was removed, leaving 100 µl in the wells, to which 3 µl of 10 U/µl DNase I (Roche, Indianapolis, IN) was directly added. Cells in TSB with no enzyme added served as the control for DNase I. After treatment, biofilms were processed and analyzed as described for the static biofilm assay.

Biofilm harvest and protein isolation.

Twenty-four-hour TSA plates were used for inoculation of sterile saline solution to reach an absorbance of 0.06 (Microscan turbidity meter; Siemens). Volumes of 50 µl of the bacterial suspensions were added to 5 ml TSB in 6-well polystyrene cell culture plates (Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY), and the plates were incubated statically at 37°C for 24 h. Medium was removed and added to 5-ml tubes, and 2 ml of PBS was added to each well. Spent medium was centrifuged twice to remove bacterial cells. Extracellular fractions were then concentrated using 100-molecular-weight-cutoff (MWCO) columns (Millipore, Billerica, MA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were removed from wells using cell scrapers (Nalge Nunc, Rochester, NY) and pipetted into 2-ml tubes. Protein isolation procedures were performed based on previously published methods (80, 81, 95) with modifications. Cells were pelleted and washed in PBS twice and then resuspended in 1-ml lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 20 mM MgCl2 [pH 7.5] with 30% [wt/vol] raffinose, containing 1 mM EDTA, 20 U DNase I [Roche], 4-mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM N-ethylmaleimide, 25 mM aminocaproic acid, lysostaphin [100 µg/ml; AMBI Products, Lawrence, NY], and lysozyme [100 µg/ml]) and incubated at 37°C for 30 min. Cell walls (CW) were separated from protoplasts by centrifugation at 6,000 × g for 20 min. The supernatant (cell wall fraction) was removed and concentrated using 100-MWCO columns (Millipore) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Protein concentrations were determined using an ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop, Wilmington, DE) prior to storage of concentrated samples at −20°C.

SDS-PAGE and Western blotting.

For each sample, 2.5 µl Laemmli buffer (96) containing β-mercaptoethanol was added to approximately 50 µg total protein and the final volume was adjusted to 15 µl with Tris-buffered saline (TBS) as needed. Samples were boiled for 10 min and then immediately placed on ice. The entire volume prepared for each sample was loaded per well, and 20 µl of Spectra multicolor high-range protein ladder (Fermentas, Pittsburgh, PA) was loaded for size determination. Proteins were separated on 5% SDS-PAGE mini gels (1.5-mm thickness) by electrophoresis at 90 V for 15 min and then at 40 V for approximately 12 h at 4°C. Gels were stained in Bio-Safe Coomassie G-250 stain (Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane by wet transfer at 30 mA for 45 min. Membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat milk–TBS–Tween. Aap B domain antiserum (30) was diluted 1:100,000 in 5% nonfat milk. Alkaline phosphatase (AP)-conjugated mouse anti-rabbit IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) was diluted 1:25,000 in 5% nonfat milk. Blots were washed after incubation with primary and secondary antisera in either TBS-Tween or TBS. Chemiluminescence was visualized following application of ECF substrate (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Piscataway, NJ) using a Typhoon FLA 7000 laser scanner (GE Healthcare Life Sciences).

Flow cell biofilms.

Stovall convertible flow cells were inoculated with approximately 105 cells of wild-type 1457 or CSF41498. Cells were allowed to adhere for 30 min at 37°C prior to initiation of medium flow. Biofilms were grown at 37°C in 100% TSB under conditions of constant flow for 24 h at a rate of either 0.25 ml/min (“slow”) or 2 ml/min (“fast”). Biofilms were harvested by removing TSB from the flow cell chamber and resuspending biofilm cells in 900 µl of RLT buffer (Qiagen)–1% β-mercaptoethanol. Cells were disrupted using a FastPrep FP120 device (Thermo Scientific). RNA isolation and purification were performed using an RNeasy minikit (Qiagen, Venlo, Limburg, The Netherlands). cDNA was generated with a QuantiTect reverse transcription kit (Qiagen, Venlo, Limburg, The Netherlands) using ~500 ng of RNA per sample. cDNA was diluted 1:20, and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed using a LightCycler 480 SYBR green I Master kit (Roche), gyrB primers as the control, and icaA-specific primers for detection of ica expression. qRT-PCR was performed on a LightCycler 480 II instrument (Roche). Transcript levels are normalized to gyrB levels, and icaA levels from “fast” samples are reported as fold change compared to “slow” samples. Data are averages from three biological replicates.

Clinical isolate selection.

Isolates were obtained from patient samples collected between 2007 and 2012 at Nebraska Medicine hospitals, with only 1 isolate per patient included. Isolates were identified as S. epidermidis using a combination of standard phenotypic methods (Microscan, Beckman Coulter) and PCR primers that amplify a unique chromosomal segment of S. epidermidis (primers 2332 and 2333; Table 3) (97). A total of 105 isolates were included in the study, consisting of 57 from high-shear and 48 from low-shear environments. In the high-shear group, isolates were from confirmed positive blood cultures (at least 2 of 3 positive blood bottles) from patients with concomitant positive catheter tip cultures. PFGE was utilized to confirm that the blood isolate and catheter tip isolate were indistinguishable. Low-shear isolates were from body fluid (n = 14), cerebrospinal fluid (n = 13), eye (n = 2), tissue (n = 5), and samples obtained during or immediately following removal of prosthetic devices (n = 14).

TABLE 3 .

Primers used in this study

Primer Sequence Amplified gene Reference or source
8 GGTCGTGACATATGAAACC icaB This study
9 CGAATCCGTCCCATTCC icaB This study
1838 TCTAATGGCCAAGATTTCACG ureD 102
1839 TGAAACTTTGGTTTACATCTGGA ureD 102
1840 CGCGAAGCCCCTACAAGAAATGACCTAGC aap This study
1841 CGCGCTGTTGTTGTACCAGGTGGCTGTCC aap This study
2301 CTCGAAGCGGTTCGTAAAAG gyrB This study
2302 TACCACGGCCATTGTCAGTA gyrB This study
A1 (2160) GCTGCAACCAAGAAACAACC agr types I, II, III 66
A2 (2161) CGTGTATTCATAATATGCTTCGATT agr types I, II, III 66
B1 (2162) TATGCAAGCCAAGCACTTGT agr types II, III 66
B2 (2163) GTGCGAAAGCCGATAACAT agr types II, III 66
C1 (2164) CCTTGGCTAGTACTACACCTTC agr type II 66
C2 (2165) GTGCTTGGCTTGCATAAACA agr type II 66
2332 ATCAAAAAGTTGGCGAACCTTTTCA S. epidermidis-specific sequence 97
2333 CAAAAGAGCGTGGAGAAAAGTATCA S. epidermidis-specific sequence 97
2336 GCTACAATGAAAGTGAAAC icaA This study
2337 GGCACTAACATCCAGCATAG icaA This study
2372 TGTGATGAGCACGCTACCGTTAG arcC 103
2373 TCCAAGTAAACCCATCGGTCTG arcC 103
2374 CATTGGATTACCTCTTTGTTCAGC aroE 103
2375 CAAGCGAAATCTGTTGGGG aroE 103
2376 CAGCCAATTCTTTTATGACTTTT gtr 103
2377 GTGATTAAAGGTATTGATTTGAAT gtr 103
2378 GATATAAGAATAAGGGTTGTGAA mutS 103
2379 GTAATCGTCTCAGTTATCATGTT mutS 103
2380 GTTACTAATACTTTTGCTGTGTTT pyrR 103
2381 GTAGAATGTAAAGAGACTAAAATGAA pyrR 103
2382 ATCCAATTAGACGCTTTAGTAAC tpi 103
2383 TTAATGATGCGCCACCTACA tpi 103
2384 CACGCATAGTATTAGCTGAAG yqiL 103
2385 CTAATGCCTTCATCTTGAGAAATAA yqiL 103

Isolation of chromosomal DNA.

Chromosomal DNA was isolated using a blood and tissue kit (Qiagen) with modifications. Volumes of 2 ml of overnight cultures were pelleted and resuspended in 500 µl TE buffer and then transferred to tubes containing 0.1-mm-diameter glass beads. Cells were lysed by 2 cycles of manual disruption for 20 s per cycle at speed 6.0 in a Thermo Savant FastPrep FP120 cell disruptor (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA) with a period of 5 min on ice between cycles. Cell lysates were centrifuged at 14,000 × g in bead beater tubes for 5 min. The supernatant (275 µl) was transferred to a new 1.5-ml tube, and 38.5 µl proteinase K and 305 µl buffer AL (Qiagen) were added. The mixtures were incubated at 60°C for 30 min, after which the isolation procedure was completed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Chromosomal DNA was eluted in sterile H2O and stored at −20°C until use.

PCR screening.

PCR was performed using Midas Mix with Taq DNA polymerase I (Monserate Biotechnology Group) and 10 µM primers. Primers 1840/1841, 2336/2337, and 8/9 were used to amplify aap (347 bp; annealing temperature of 50°C with 30-s extension), icaA (597 bp; annealing temperature of 50°C with 30-s extension), and icaB (870 bp; annealing temperature of 53°C with 50-s extension), respectively (Table 3). The presence of icaADBC was confirmed using an icaA dot blot. Briefly, 3 µl denaturing solution (4 M NaOH and 100 mM Na2-EDTA) was added to 27 µl water containing 750 ng chromosomal DNA and the reaction mixture was incubated at room temperature for 10 min. Denatured sample (5 µl) was spotted onto a positively charged nylon membrane (Roche Diagnostics) and allowed to dry. DNA was fixed using a Stratalinker UV 1800 Crosslinker (Stratagene), and the blot was hybridized with a digoxigenin (Roche, Indianapolis, IN)-labeled icaA DNA probe (amplified using primers 2336/2337; Table 3) and subsequently developed using the recommendations of the manufacturers.

agr typing.

Isolates were typed using the methodology developed by Li et al. (66). The reaction annealing temperature was 55°C, with a 1-min extension repeated for 25 cycles. Three groups of primers (A, B, and C) with different specificities for sequences within the variable region of agrD were used to amplify genomic DNA. The primers were designed such that the A primers (2160/2161) amplified a 1,022-bp region common to all 3 agr types, the B primers (2162/2163) amplified 453 bp present only in types II and III, and the C primers (2164/2165) amplified 615 bp specific to type II. The PCR typing methodology was confirmed by sequencing representative isolates from each of the 3 agr types.

PIA immunoblots.

Bacterial cultures were adjusted to an OD600 value of 5, subsequently pelleted by centrifugation at 6,000 × g for 5 min, and then resuspended in 500 µl of 0.5 M EDTA and boiled for 5 min. Cells were pelleted, and 40 µl of supernatant was transferred to new tubes. A 10-µl volume of proteinase K (20 mg/ml) was added to tubes prior to incubation at 37°C for 1 h. Samples were boiled for 5 min and then stored at −20°C until use. Immobilon-P PVDF membrane (Millipore) was primed in methanol and then transferred to TBS. The membrane was placed in a Bio-Dot apparatus (Bio-Rad) and dried briefly by vacuum. A 300-µl volume of TBS was added to each well and pulled through the membrane by vacuum. A 100-µl volume of sample was applied to each well, liquid was removed by vacuum, and membranes were dried to fix samples. To detect PIA, membranes were rehydrated in TBS and then blocked in 5% nonfat milk–Tris-buffered saline with Tween 20 (TBST) at room temperature for 2 to 4 h. Primary antibody (kind gift of Jim O’Gara, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland), diluted 1:25,000 in 5% nonfat milk–TBST, was added and incubated with the blot for at least 4 h. Goat anti-rabbit IgG AP-conjugated secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch) was added at a concentration of 1:25,000 and incubated at room temperature for 1 h. ECF detection and visualization were performed as previously described.

Multilocus sequence typing (MLST).

Reaction mixtures (30 µl) were prepared in Thermo-Fast 96 ABgene PCR plates (Thermo Scientific) by combining 3 µl of 10× buffer, 2.5 µl of deoxynucleoside triphosphates (dNTPs) (2.5 mM), 18.5 µl distilled water (dH2O), 1.2 µl MgCl2, 2.5 µl of chromosomal DNA, 0.8 µl of both forward and reverse primers (10 µM; the primers are listed in Table 3), and 0.2 µl of Taq polymerase (Thermo). Plates were sealed with film, and then PCR was performed with the following parameters: initial denaturation at 95°C for 3 min, followed by 25 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 15 s, annealing at 50°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 30 s, with a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. DNA amplification was confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized by exposure to UV light following ethidium bromide staining.

To prepare samples for sequencing, 2.5 µl of PCR product was added to a mixture of 2.5 µl of water and 1.5 µl of exonuclease I (0.25%; Affymetrix) and shrimp alkaline phosphatase (2.5%; Affymetrix) per well of a 96-well GeneMate FastPlate DNA sequencing plate (BioExpress). Reaction mixtures were incubated at 37°C for 30 min followed by a 5-min incubation at 95°C to inactivate enzymes. Primer (1 µl [2.5 µM]) was added to each well before the plates were sent to the University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC) core sequencing laboratory for Illumina HiSeq sequencing using an Applied Biosystems (ABI) 3730 48-capillary electrophoresis DNA analyzer.

Determination of sequence types and genetic clusters.

The alleles at all 7 MLST loci were distinguished by sequence comparisons using the publically available S. epidermidis MLST database (http://sepidermidis.mlst.net/). Sequence types (STs) were assigned based on allelic profiles. Novel alleles and STs identified during the study were submitted to the database curator for number assignment. Sequences of 88 clinical isolates (44 high-shear and 44 low-shear strains) were assigned to genetic clusters (GCs) from the Bayesian clustering of the MLST database as reported by Tolo et al. (79).

Generation of biofilm-enriched variants.

Methods were adapted from those reported by Christner et al. (36). Fifty-milliliter tissue culture flasks containing 5 ml TSB–10 µg/ml trimethoprim were inoculated with single colonies of the 1457 Δica mutant strain and grown statically at 37°C for 24 h. The flasks were then subjected to vortex mixing, the medium was removed, the flasks were washed with 5 ml fresh TSB, the medium was removed, and, finally, 5 ml fresh TSB–10 µg/ml trimethoprim was added and the flasks were incubated statically at 37°C for 2 to 4 days. The medium was removed, and the flasks were washed twice with 5 ml sterile PBS. The flask interiors were scraped and the contents plated on TSA–10 µg/ml trimethoprim and then incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Single colonies were patched onto TSA–10 µg/ml trimethoprim and tested for biofilm formation in the static assay as described previously.

BioFlux biofilm formation and visualization.

Overnight cultures were diluted to an OD600 of 0.2. Channels of 24-well plates (Fluxion Biosciences Inc., South San Francisco, CA) were primed from outlet wells with 75% TSB at 10 dyne/cm2. To seed bacteria, 300 µl 75% TSB and 300 µl of diluted overnight cultures were added to outlet wells (final inoculum of OD600 = 0.1), and 310 µl 75% TSB was added to both inlet wells (A and B) to prevent backflow. Inocula were flowed from outlet wells at 2 dyne/cm2 for 4 s, and the bacteria were allowed to adhere for 1 h. TSB (75%) was supplied continuously at a shear rate of 0.8 dyne/cm2, and images were acquired every 5 min for the duration of the experiment. Image analysis and movie creation were performed using BioFlux Montage software.

High-throughput sequencing and variant detection.

Sequencing was performed on a MiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA). For each sample, between 1.8 and 2.8 M paired-end reads (150-bp pairs) were obtained. The reads were aligned to the reference assembly of Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 12228 (NC_004461.1) using Bowtie2 (98). Alignments were processed with SAMtools (99) for format conversion and for the removal of putative PCR artifacts. Variant detection was then performed with SAMtools and VarScan2 (100). Finally, SNPEff (101) was employed to annotate detected variants.

Statistical analyses.

Differences between high- and low-shear isolates with respect to the presence of the ica operon or aap were assessed separately by χ2 tests assuming equal distributions, with the null hypothesis that there was no difference in carriage of icaADBC or aap, respectively, between shear groups. To investigate associations between shear groups and biofilm phenotype, agr type, or genetic cluster, contingency tables were generated and analyzed by χ2 test for association, with the null hypotheses that there was no association between shear groups and biofilm phenotype, agr type, or genetic cluster, respectively (Microsoft Excel). Differences in icaA expression under conditions of slow and fast shear were assessed by Student’s t test.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

P.D.F. and A.R.H. were supported by projects 2 and 3, respectively, of P01 AI083211 from the NIH/NIAID. D.A.R. was supported by R01 GM080602 from NIH/NIGMS.

We thank Sujata Chaudhari for expert help with our figures.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Grice EA, Kong HH, Conlan S, Deming CB, Davis J, Young AC, NISC Comparative Sequencing Program, Bouffard GG, Blakesley RW, Murray PR, Green ED, Turner ML, Segre JA. 2009. Topographical and temporal diversity of the human skin microbiome. Science 324:1190–1192. doi: 10.1126/science.1171700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Oh J, Byrd AL, Deming C, Conlan S, Program NCS, Kong HH, Segre JA. 2014. Biogeography and individuality shape function in the human skin metagenome. Nature 514:59–64. doi: 10.1038/nature13786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rogers KL, Fey PD, Rupp ME. 2009. Coagulase-negative staphylococcal infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am 23:73–98. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2008.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sievert DM, Ricks P, Edwards JR, Schneider A, Patel J, Srinivasan A, Kallen A, Limbago B, Fridkin S; National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Team and Participating NHSN Facilities . 2013. Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2009–2010. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 34:1–14. doi: 10.1086/668770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Otto M. 2009. Staphylococcus epidermidis—the “accidental” pathogen. Nat Rev Microbiol 7:555–567. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fey PD. 2010. Modality of bacterial growth presents unique targets: how do we treat biofilm-mediated infections? Curr Opin Microbiol 13:610–615. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2010.09.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Thurlow LR, Hanke ML, Fritz T, Angle A, Aldrich A, Williams SH, Engebretsen IL, Bayles KW, Horswill AR, Kielian T. 2011. Staphylococcus aureus biofilms prevent macrophage phagocytosis and attenuate inflammation in vivo. J Immunol 186:6585–6596. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1002794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Moormeier DE, Bose JL, Horswill AR, Bayles KW. 2014. Temporal and stochastic control of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm development. mBio 5:e01341-14. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01341-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cheung GY, Joo HS, Chatterjee SS, Otto M. 2014. Phenol-soluble modulins—critical determinants of staphylococcal virulence. FEMS Microbiol Rev 38:698–719. doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.12057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lister JL, Horswill AR. 2014. Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: recent developments in biofilm dispersal. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 4:178. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Otto M. 2013. Staphylococcal infections: mechanisms of biofilm maturation and detachment as critical determinants of pathogenicity. Annu Rev Med 64:175–188. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-042711-140023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Scherr TD, Heim CE, Morrison JM, Kielian T. 2014. Hiding in plain sight: interplay between staphylococcal biofilms and host immunity. Front Immunol 5:37. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Speziale P, Pietrocola G, Foster TJ, Geoghegan JA. 2014. Protein-based biofilm matrices in staphylococci. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 4:171. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Heilmann C, Schweitzer O, Gerke C, Vanittanakom N, Mack D, Götz F. 1996. Molecular basis of intercellular adhesion in the biofilm-forming Staphylococcus epidermidis. Mol Microbiol 20:1083–1091. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1996.tb02548.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mack D, Fischer W, Krokotsch A, Leopold K, Hartmann R, Egge H, Laufs R. 1996. The intercellular adhesin involved in biofilm accumulation of Staphylococcus epidermidis is a linear beta-1,6-linked glucosaminoglycan: purification and structural analysis. J Bacteriol 178:175–183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mack D, Nedelmann M, Krokotsch A, Schwarzkopf A, Heesemann J, Laufs R. 1994. Characterization of transposon mutants of biofilm-producing Staphylococcus epidermidis impaired in the accumulative phase of biofilm production: genetic identification of a hexosamine-containing polysaccharide intercellular adhesin. Infect Immun 62:3244–3253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Maira-Litrán T, Kropec A, Abeygunawardana C, Joyce J, Mark G III, Goldmann DA, Pier GB. 2002. Immunochemical properties of the staphylococcal poly-N-acetylglucosamine surface polysaccharide. Infect Immun 70:4433–4440. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.8.4433-4440.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Büttner H, Mack D, Rohde H. 2015. Structural basis of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation: mechanisms and molecular interactions. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 5:14. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2015.00014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cue D, Lei MG, Lee CY. 2012. Genetic regulation of the intercellular adhesion locus in staphylococci. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2:38. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2012.00038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Brooks JL, Jefferson KK. 2014. Phase variation of poly-N-acetylglucosamine expression in Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS Pathog 10:e1004292. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cue D, Lei MG, Lee CY. 2013. Activation of sarX by Rbf is required for biofilm formation and icaADBC expression in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 195:1515–1524. doi: 10.1128/JB.00012-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fowler VG Jr, Fey PD, Reller LB, Chamis AL, Corey GR, Rupp ME. 2001. The intercellular adhesin locus ica is present in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus from bacteremic patients with infected and uninfected prosthetic joints. Med Microbiol Immunol 189:127–131. doi: 10.1007/s430-001-8018-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Izano EA, Amarante MA, Kher WB, Kaplan JB. 2008. Differential roles of poly-N-acetylglucosamine surface polysaccharide and extracellular DNA in Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:470–476. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02073-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lin MH, Shu JC, Lin LP, Chong KY, Cheng YW, Du JF, Liu ST. 2015. Elucidating the crucial role of poly N-acetylglucosamine from Staphylococcus aureus in cellular adhesion and pathogenesis. PLoS One 10:e0124216. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Pozzi C, Waters EM, Rudkin JK, Schaeffer CR, Lohan AJ, Tong P, Loftus BJ, Pier GB, Fey PD, Massey RC, O’Gara JP. 2012. Methicillin resistance alters the biofilm phenotype and attenuates virulence in Staphylococcus aureus device-associated infections. PLoS Pathog 8:e1002626. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cho SH, Naber K, Hacker J, Ziebuhr W. 2002. Detection of the icaADBC gene cluster and biofilm formation in Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates from catheter-related urinary tract infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents 19:570–575. doi: 10.1016/S0924-8579(02)00101-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Frebourg NB, Lefebvre S, Baert S, Lemeland JF. 2000. PCR-based assay for discrimination between invasive and contaminating Staphylococcus epidermidis strains. J Clin Microbiol 38:877–880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kozitskaya S, Cho SH, Dietrich K, Marre R, Naber K, Ziebuhr W. 2004. The bacterial insertion sequence element IS256 occurs preferentially in nosocomial Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates: association with biofilm formation and resistance to aminoglycosides. Infect Immun 72:1210–1215. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.2.1210-1215.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kozitskaya S, Olson ME, Fey PD, Witte W, Ohlsen K, Ziebuhr W. 2005. Clonal analysis of Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates carrying or lacking biofilm-mediating genes by multilocus sequence typing. J Clin Microbiol 43:4751–4757. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.9.4751-4757.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rohde H, Burandt EC, Siemssen N, Frommelt L, Burdelski C, Wurster S, Scherpe S, Davies AP, Harris LG, Horstkotte MA, Knobloch JK, Ragunath C, Kaplan JB, Mack D. 2007. Polysaccharide intercellular adhesin or protein factors in biofilm accumulation of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus isolated from prosthetic hip and knee joint infections. Biomaterials 28:1711–1720. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.11.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ziebuhr W, Heilmann C, Götz F, Meyer P, Wilms K, Straube E, Hacker J. 1997. Detection of the intercellular adhesion gene cluster (ica) and phase variation in Staphylococcus epidermidis blood culture strains and mucosal isolates. Infect Immun 65:890–896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Fey PD, Olson ME. 2010. Current concepts in biofilm formation of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Future Microbiol 5:917–933. doi: 10.2217/fmb.10.56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mack D, Siemssen N, Laufs R. 1992. Parallel induction by glucose of adherence and a polysaccharide antigen specific for plastic-adherent Staphylococcus epidermidis: evidence for functional relation to intercellular adhesion. Infect Immun 60:2048–2057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Fitzpatrick F, Humphreys H, Smyth E, Kennedy CA, O’Gara JP. 2002. Environmental regulation of biofilm formation in intensive care unit isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Hosp Infect 52:212–218. doi: 10.1053/jhin.2002.1309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Weisser M, Schoenfelder SM, Orasch C, Arber C, Gratwohl A, Frei R, Eckart M, Flückiger U, Ziebuhr W. 2010. Hypervariability of biofilm formation and oxacillin resistance in a Staphylococcus epidermidis strain causing persistent severe infection in an immunocompromised patient. J Clin Microbiol 48:2407–2412. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00492-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Christner M, Franke GC, Schommer NN, Wendt U, Wegert K, Pehle P, Kroll G, Schulze C, Buck F, Mack D, Aepfelbacher M, Rohde H. 2010. The giant extracellular matrix-binding protein of Staphylococcus epidermidis mediates biofilm accumulation and attachment to fibronectin. Mol Microbiol 75:187–207. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06981.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Rohde H, Burdelski C, Bartscht K, Hussain M, Buck F, Horstkotte MA, Knobloch JK, Heilmann C, Herrmann M, Mack D. 2005. Induction of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation via proteolytic processing of the accumulation-associated protein by staphylococcal and host proteases. Mol Microbiol 55:1883–1895. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04515.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Schommer NN, Christner M, Hentschke M, Ruckdeschel K, Aepfelbacher M, Rohde H. 2011. Staphylococcus epidermidis uses distinct mechanisms of biofilm formation to interfere with phagocytosis and activation of mouse macrophage-like cells 774A.1. Infect Immun 79:2267–2276. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01142-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Vuong C, Kocianova S, Voyich JM, Yao Y, Fischer ER, DeLeo FR, Otto M. 2004. A crucial role for exopolysaccharide modification in bacterial biofilm formation, immune evasion, and virulence. J Biol Chem 279:54881–54886. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M411374200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hanke ML, Angle A, Kielian T. 2012. MyD88-dependent signaling influences fibrosis and alternative macrophage activation during Staphylococcus aureus biofilm infection. PLoS One 7:e42476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hanke ML, Heim CE, Angle A, Sanderson SD, Kielian T. 2013. Targeting macrophage activation for the prevention and treatment of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm infections. J Immunol 190:2159–2168. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1202348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Foka A, Katsikogianni MG, Anastassiou ED, Spiliopoulou I, Missirlis YF. 2012. The combined effect of surface chemistry and flow conditions on Staphylococcus epidermidis adhesion and ica operon expression. Eur Cells Mater 24:386–402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Los R, Sawicki R, Juda M, Stankevic M, Rybojad P, Sawicki M, Malm A, Ginalska G. 2010. A comparative analysis of phenotypic and genotypic methods for the determination of the biofilm-forming abilities of Staphylococcus epidermidis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 310:97–103. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.02050.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sellman BR, Timofeyeva Y, Nanra J, Scott A, Fulginiti JP, Matsuka YV, Baker SM. 2008. Expression of Staphylococcus epidermidis SdrG increases following exposure to an in vivo environment. Infect Immun 76:2950–2957. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00055-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Weaver WM, Milisavljevic V, Miller JF, Di Carlo D. 2012. Fluid flow induces biofilm formation in Staphylococcus epidermidis polysaccharide intracellular adhesin-positive clinical isolates. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:5890–5896. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01139-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Linnes JC, Ma H, Bryers JD. 2013. Giant extracellular matrix binding protein expression in Staphylococcus epidermidis is regulated by biofilm formation and osmotic pressure. Curr Microbiol 66:627–633. doi: 10.1007/s00284-013-0316-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Cafiso V, Bertuccio T, Santagati M, Campanile F, Amicosante G, Perilli MG, Selan L, Artini M, Nicoletti G, Stefani S. 2004. Presence of the ica operon in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis and its role in biofilm production. Clin Microbiol Infect 10:1081–1088. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.01024.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Firrell JC, Lipowsky HH. 1989. Leukocyte margination and deformation in mesenteric venules of rat. Am J Physiol 256:H1667–H1674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lipowsky HH, Kovalcheck S, Zweifach BW. 1978. The distribution of blood rheological parameters in the microvasculature of cat mesentery. Circ Res 43:738–749. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.43.5.738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.De Araujo GL, Coelho LR, de Carvalho CB, Maciel RM, Coronado AZ, Rozenbaum R, Ferreira-Carvalho BT, Figueiredo AM, Teixeira LA. 2006. Commensal isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis are also well equipped to produce biofilm on polystyrene surfaces. J Antimicrob Chemother 57:855–864. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkl071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Hellmark B, Söderquist B, Unemo M, Nilsdotter-Augustinsson Å. 2013. Comparison of Staphylococcus epidermidis isolated from prosthetic joint infections and commensal isolates in regard to antibiotic susceptibility, agr type, biofilm production, and epidemiology. Int J Med Microbiol 303:32–39. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2012.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mertens A, Ghebremedhin B. 2013. Genetic determinants and biofilm formation of clinical Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates from blood cultures and indwelling devises. Eur J Microbiol Immunol 3:111–119. doi: 10.1556/EuJMI.3.2013.2.4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Monk AB, Boundy S, Chu VH, Bettinger JC, Robles JR, Fowler VG Jr, Archer GL. 2008. Analysis of the genotype and virulence of Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates from patients with infective endocarditis. Infect Immun 76:5127–5132. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00606-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Petrelli D, Zampaloni C, D’Ercole S, Prenna M, Ballarini P, Ripa S, Vitali LA. 2006. Analysis of different genetic traits and their association with biofilm formation in Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates from central venous catheter infections. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 25:773–781. doi: 10.1007/s10096-006-0226-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Stevens NT, Tharmabala M, Dillane T, Greene CM, O’Gara JP, Humphreys H. 2008. Biofilm and the role of the ica operon and aap in Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates causing neurosurgical meningitis. Clin Microbiol Infect 14:719–722. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02012.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Vandecasteele SJ, Peetermans WE, Merckx R, Van Eldere J. 2003. Expression of biofilm-associated genes in Staphylococcus epidermidis during in vitro and in vivo foreign body infections. J Infect Dis 188:730–737. doi: 10.1086/377452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Costa AR, Henriques M, Oliveira R, Azeredo J. 2009. The role of polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA) in Staphylococcus epidermidis adhesion to host tissues and subsequent antibiotic tolerance. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 28:623–629. doi: 10.1007/s10096-008-0684-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Milisavljevic V, Wu F, Cimmotti J, Haas J, Della-Latta P, Larson E, Saiman L. 2005. Genetic relatedness of Staphylococcus epidermidis from infected infants and staff in the neonatal intensive care unit. Am J Infect Control 33:341–347. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2005.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Vuong C, Otto M. 2002. Staphylococcus epidermidis infections. Microbes Infect 4:481–489. doi: 10.1016/S1286-4579(02)01563-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Thomas JC, Robinson DA. 2014. Multilocus sequence typing of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Methods Mol Biol 1106:61–69. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-736-5_5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Thomas JC, Zhang L, Robinson DA. 2014. Differing lifestyles of Staphylococcus epidermidis as revealed through Bayesian clustering of multilocus sequence types. Infect Genet Evol 22:257–264. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2013.06.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Boles BR, Horswill AR. 2011. Staphylococcal biofilm disassembly. Trends Microbiol 19:449–455. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2011.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Dunman PM, Murphy E, Haney S, Palacios D, Tucker-Kellogg G, Wu S, Brown EL, Zagursky RJ, Shlaes D, Projan SJ. 2001. Transcription profiling-based identification of Staphylococcus aureus genes regulated by the agr and/or sarA loci. J Bacteriol 183:7341–7353. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.24.7341-7353.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Lauderdale KJ, Boles BR, Cheung AL, Horswill AR. 2009. Interconnections between sigma B, agr, and proteolytic activity in Staphylococcus aureus biofilm maturation. Infect Immun 77:1623–1635. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01036-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Thoendel M, Kavanaugh JS, Flack CE, Horswill AR. 2011. Peptide signaling in the staphylococci. Chem Rev 111:117–151. doi: 10.1021/cr100370n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Li M, Guan M, Jiang XF, Yuan FY, Xu M, Zhang WZ, Lu Y. 2004. Genetic polymorphism of the accessory gene regulator (agr) locus in Staphylococcus epidermidis and its association with pathogenicity. J Med Microbiol 53:545–549. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.05406-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Olson ME, Todd DA, Schaeffer CR, Paharik AE, Van Dyke MJ, Büttner H, Dunman PM, Rohde H, Cech NB, Fey PD, Horswill AR. 2014. Staphylococcus epidermidis agr quorum-sensing system: signal identification, cross talk, and importance in colonization. J Bacteriol 196:3482–3493. doi: 10.1128/JB.01882-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Hennig S, Nyunt Wai S, Ziebuhr W. 2007. Spontaneous switch to PIA-independent biofilm formation in an ica-positive Staphylococcus epidermidis isolate. Int J Med Microbiol 297:117–122. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2006.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Kogan G, Sadovskaya I, Chaignon P, Chokr A, Jabbouri S. 2006. Biofilms of clinical strains of Staphylococcus that do not contain polysaccharide intercellular adhesin. FEMS Microbiol Lett 255:11–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2005.00043.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Qin Z, Yang X, Yang L, Jiang J, Ou Y, Molin S, Qu D. 2007. Formation and properties of in vitro biofilms of ica-negative Staphylococcus epidermidis clinical isolates. J Med Microbiol 56:83–93. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.46799-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Handke LD, Slater SR, Conlon KM, O’Donnell ST, Olson ME, Bryant KA, Rupp ME, O’Gara JP, Fey PD. 2007. SigmaB and SarA independently regulate polysaccharide intercellular adhesin production in Staphylococcus epidermidis. Can J Microbiol 53:82–91. doi: 10.1139/w06-108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Schaeffer CR, Woods KM, Longo GM, Kiedrowski MR, Paharik AE, Büttner H, Christner M, Boissy RJ, Horswill AR, Rohde H, Fey PD. 2015. Accumulation-associated protein enhances Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation under dynamic conditions and is required for infection in a rat catheter model. Infect Immun 83:214–226. doi: 10.1128/IAI.02177-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Schuch R, Pelzek AJ, Raz A, Euler CW, Ryan PA, Winer BY, Farnsworth A, Bhaskaran SS, Stebbins CE, Xu Y, Clifford A, Bearss DJ, Vankayalapati H, Goldberg AR, Fischetti VA. 2013. Use of a bacteriophage lysin to identify a novel target for antimicrobial development. PLoS One 8:e60754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Xu Y, Brenning B, Clifford A, Vollmer D, Bearss J, Jones C, McCarthy V, Shi C, Wolfe B, Aavula B, Warner S, Bearss DJ, McCullar MV, Schuch R, Pelzek A, Bhaskaran SS, Stebbins CE, Goldberg AR, Fischetti VA, Vankayalapati H. 2013. Discovery of novel putative inhibitors of UDP-GlcNAc 2-epimerase as potent antibacterial agents. ACS Med Chem Lett 4:1142–1147. doi: 10.1021/ml4001936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kawamura T, Ishimoto N, Ito E.. 1979. Enzymatic synthesis of uridine diphosphate N-acetyl-d-mannosaminuronic acid. J Biol Chem 254:8457–8465. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Kawamura T, Kimura M, Yamamori S, Ito E. 1978. Enzymatic formation of uridine diphosphate N-acetyl-d-mannosamine. J Biol Chem 253:3595–3601. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Heilmann C, Thumm G, Chhatwal GS, Hartleib J, Uekötter A, Peters G. 2003. Identification and characterization of a novel autolysin (Aae) with adhesive properties from Staphylococcus epidermidis. Microbiology 149:2769–2778. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.26527-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Juárez-Verdayes MA, Ramón-Peréz ML, Flores-Páez LA, Camarillo-Márquez O, Zenteno JC, Jan-Roblero J, Cancino-Diaz ME, Cancino-Diaz JC. 2013. Staphylococcus epidermidis with the icaA(−)/icaD(−)/IS256(–) genotype and protein or protein/extracellular-DNA biofilm is frequent in ocular infections. J Med Microbiol 62:1579–1587. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.055210-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Tolo I, Thomas JC, Fischer RS, Brown EL, Gray BM, Robinson DA 13 April 2016. Do Staphylococcus epidermidis genetic clusters predict isolation sources? J Clin Microbiol doi: 10.1128/JCM.03345-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Roche FM, Massey R, Peacock SJ, Day NP, Visai L, Speziale P, Lam A, Pallen M, Foster TJ. 2003. Characterization of novel LPXTG-containing proteins of Staphylococcus aureus identified from genome sequences. Microbiology 149:643–654. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.25996-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Roche FM, Meehan M, Foster TJ. 2003. The Staphylococcus aureus surface protein SasG and its homologues promote bacterial adherence to human desquamated nasal epithelial cells. Microbiology 149:2759–2767. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.26412-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Macintosh RL, Brittan JL, Bhattacharya R, Jenkinson HF, Derrick J, Upton M, Handley PS. 2009. The terminal A domain of the fibrillar accumulation-associated protein (Aap) of Staphylococcus epidermidis mediates adhesion to human corneocytes. J Bacteriol 191:7007–7016. doi: 10.1128/JB.00764-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Spiliopoulou AI, Krevvata MI, Kolonitsiou F, Harris LG, Wilkinson TS, Davies AP, Dimitracopoulos GO, Karamanos NK, Mack D, Anastassiou ED. 2012. An extracellular Staphylococcus epidermidis polysaccharide: relation to polysaccharide intercellular adhesin and its implication in phagocytosis. BMC Microbiol 12:76. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Sadykov MR, Olson ME, Halouska S, Zhu Y, Fey PD, Powers R, Somerville GA. 2008. Tricarboxylic acid cycle-dependent regulation of Staphylococcus epidermidis polysaccharide intercellular adhesin synthesis. J Bacteriol 190:7621–7632. doi: 10.1128/JB.00806-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Rogers KL, Rupp ME, Fey PD. 2008. The presence of icaADBC is detrimental to the colonization of human skin by Staphylococcus epidermidis. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:6155–6157. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01017-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Schoenfelder SM, Lange C, Eckart M, Hennig S, Kozytska S, Ziebuhr W. 2010. Success through diversity—how Staphylococcus epidermidis establishes as a nosocomial pathogen. Int J Med Microbiol 300:380–386. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2010.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Rogers KL. 2008. Class III phase variation in Staphylococcus epidermidis. University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE. [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Formosa-Dague C, Speziale P, Foster TJ, Geoghegan JA, Dufrêne YF. 2016. Zinc-dependent mechanical properties of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm-forming surface protein SasG. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:410–415. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1519265113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Whelan F, Potts JR. 2015. Two repetitive, biofilm-forming proteins from staphylococci: from disorder to extension. Biochem Soc Trans 43:861–866. doi: 10.1042/BST20150088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Dean BA, Williams RE, Hall F, Corse J. 1973. Phage typing of coagulase-negative staphylococci and micrococci. J Hyg 71:261–270. doi: 10.1017/S0022172400022737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Nedelmann M, Sabottke A, Laufs R, Mack D. 1998. Generalized transduction for genetic linkage analysis and transfer of transposon insertions in different Staphylococcus epidermidis strains. Zentralbl Bakteriol 287:85–92. doi: 10.1016/S0934-8840(98)80151-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Goering RV, Fey PD. 2014. Pulsed field gel electrophoresis of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Methods Mol Biol 1106:55–60. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-736-5_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Christensen GD, Simpson WA, Bisno AL, Beachey EH. 1982. Adherence of slime-producing strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis to smooth surfaces. Infect Immun 37:318–326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Kaplan JB, Ragunath C, Velliyagounder K, Fine DH, Ramasubbu N. 2004. Enzymatic detachment of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:2633–2636. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.7.2633-2636.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.McCrea KW, Hartford O, Davis S, Eidhin DN, Lina G, Speziale P, Foster TJ, Höök M. 2000. The serine-aspartate repeat (Sdr) protein family in Staphylococcus epidermidis. Microbiology 146:1535–1546. doi: 10.1099/00221287-146-7-1535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Laemmli UK. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Martineau F, Picard FJ, Roy PH, Ouellette M, Bergeron MG. 1996. Species-specific and ubiquitous DNA-based assays for rapid identification of Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Clin Microbiol 34:2888–2893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Langmead B, Salzberg SL. 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9:357–359. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup . 2009. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25:2078–2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Koboldt DC, Zhang Q, Larson DE, Shen D, McLellan MD, Lin L, Miller CA, Mardis ER, Ding L, Wilson RK. 2012. VarScan 2: somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing. Genome Res 22:568–576. doi: 10.1101/gr.129684.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Cingolani P, Platts A, Wang Le L, Coon M, Nguyen T, Wang L, Land SJ, Lu X, Ruden DM. 2012. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly 6:80–92. doi: 10.4161/fly.19695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Pechorsky A, Nitzan Y, Lazarovitch T. 2009. Identification of pathogenic bacteria in blood cultures: comparison between conventional and PCR methods. J Microbiol Methods 78:325–330. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2009.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Thomas JC, Vargas MR, Miragaia M, Peacock SJ, Archer GL, Enright MC. 2007. Improved multilocus sequence typing scheme for Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Clin Microbiol 45:616–619. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01934-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from mSphere are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES