Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2015 Dec 8;46(4):387–403. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2015.00039.x

Associations Between Abortion Services and Acceptance of Postabortion Contraception in Six Indian States

Sushanta K Banerjee 1, Sumit Gulati 2, Kathryn L Andersen 5, Valerie Acre 6, Janardan Warvadekar 3, Deepa Navin 4
PMCID: PMC5064648  PMID: 26643489

Abstract

Women receiving induced abortions or postabortion care are at high risk of subsequent unintended pregnancy, and intervals of less than six months between abortion and subsequent pregnancy may be associated with adverse outcomes. This study highlights the prevalence and attributes of postabortion contraceptive acceptance from 2,456 health facilities in six major Indian states, among 292,508 women who received abortion care services from July 2011 through June 2014. Eighty‐one percent of the women accepted postabortion contraceptive methods: 53 percent short‐term, 11 percent intrauterine devices, and 16 percent sterilization. Postabortion contraceptive acceptance was highest among women who were aged 25 years and older, received first‐trimester services, received induced abortion, attended primary‐level health facilities, and had medical abortions. Doctors receiving post‐training support were more likely to offer contraceptives, but no association was observed between such support and acceptance of IUDs or sterilization. Comprehensive service‐delivery interventions, including ensuring availability of skilled providers and contraceptive commodities, offering clinical mentoring for providers, identifying and addressing provider bias, and improving provider counseling skills, can increase postabortion contraceptive acceptance and reduce unintended pregnancy.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Agarwal, S. , Chauhan L.N., and Modi D.A.. 2007. “Changing trends in MTP at SSG hospital, Barod—a retrospective study,” Journal of the Indian Medical Association 105(3): 130–132. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aich, P. , Banerjee Sushanta K., Jha T.K., Aggarwal A., and Sinha D.. 2011. Situation Analysis of MTP Services in Bihar: February‐May 2011. New Delhi, India: Ipas. [Google Scholar]
  3. Banerjee, Sushanta Kumar and Louise Andersen Kathryn. 2012. “Exploring the pathways of unsafe abortion in Madhya Pradesh, India,” Global Public Health 7(8): 882–896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Banerjee, Sushanta K. , Andersen Kathryn L., Baird Traci L., Batra Sangeeta, and Warvadekar Janardan. 2014. “Evaluation of a multi‐pronged intervention to improve access to safe abortion care in two districts in Jharkhand,” BMC Health Services Research 14(5): 227–239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Banerjee, Sushanta K. , Andersen Kathryn, Tank Jaydeep, Parihar M., Shah M., and Thanwala U.. 2011. “Evaluation of a network of medical abortion providers in two districts of Maharashtra, India,” Global Public Health 6(3): 283–292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Banerjee, Sushanta K. , Andersen Kathryn L., and Warvadekar Janardan. 2009. Results of a Government and NGO Partnership for Provision of Safe Abortion Services in Uttarakhand, India: A Pre‐ and Post‐intervention Evaluation of Increasing Access to Safe Abortion Services (IASAS) Program. New Delhi, India: Ipas. [Google Scholar]
  7. Banerjee, Sushanta K. 2012. Pathways and consequences of unsafe abortion: A comparison among women with complications after induced and spontaneous abortions in Madhya Pradesh, India, International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 118(Suppl. 2): S113–S120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Banerjee, Sushanta K. and Manning Vinoj. 2010. “Post‐abortion contraception: A neglected public health domain.” Paper presented at the Asian Population Association Conference, New Delhi, India.
  9. Bigelow, C.A. and Bryant Allison S.. 2015. “Short interpregnancy intervals: An evidence‐based guide for clinicians,” Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey 70(7): 458–464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Billings, Deborah L. , Ankrah V., Baird Traci L., Taylor J.E., Ababio K.P., and Ntow S.. 1999. Midwives and comprehensive postabortion care in Ghana, in Huntington D. and Piet‐Pelon N.J. (eds.), Postabortion Care: Lessons from Operations Research. New York: Population Council. [Google Scholar]
  11. Billings, Deborah L. and Benson Janie. 2005. “Postabortion care in Latin America: Policy and service recommendations from a decade of operations research,” Health Policy and Planning 20(3): 158–166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cleland, John , Harbison Sarah, and Shah Iqbal H.. 2014. “Unmet need for contraception: Issues and challenges,” Studies in Family Planning 45(2): 105–122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Conde‐Agudelo, A. , Belizan J.M., Breman R., Brockman S.C., and Rosas‐Bermudez A.. 2005. Effect of the interpregnancy interval after an abortion on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America, International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 89(Suppl. 1): S34–S40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Conde‐Agudelo, A. , Rosas‐Bermudez A., and Ana C.K.G. 2007. “Effects of birth spacing on maternal health: A systematic review,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 196(4): 123–132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Duggal, Ravi and Ramachandran Vimala. 2004. “The abortion assessment project–India: Key findings and recommendations,” Reproductive Health Matters 12(24): 122–129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ganatra, Bela and Hirve Siddhi. 2002. “Induced abortions among adolescent women in rural Maharashtra, India,” Reproductive Health Matters 10(19): 76–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Goodman, S. , Hendlish S.K., Reeves M.F., and Foster‐Rosales A.. 2008. “Impact of immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine contraception on repeat abortion,” Contraception 78(2): 143–148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Government of India . 2004. Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971. New Delhi, India: Commercial Law Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hyman, Alyson and Kumar Anu. 2004. “A woman‐centered model for comprehensive abortion care,” International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 86(3): 409–410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO), International Confederation of Midwives (ICM), International Council of Nurses (ICN), and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) . 2009. Family Planning: A Key Component of Post Abortion Care. Consensus Statement, 25 September.
  21. Jain, A.K. , Obare F., RamaRao S., and Askew I.. 2013. “Reducing unmet need by supporting women with met need,” International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 39(3): 133–141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Jejeebhoy, S.J. , Zavier A.J.F., and Kalyanwala S.. 2010. Assessing Abortion‐related Experiences and Needs in Four Districts of Maharashtra and Rajasthan, 2006. New Delhi, India: Population Council. [Google Scholar]
  23. Johnson, Brooke R. , Ndhlovu Singatsho, Farr Sherry L., and Chipato Tsungai. 2002. “Reducing unplanned pregnancy and abortion in Zimbabwe through postabortion contraception,” Studies in Family Planning 33(2): 195–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kalyanwala, Shveta , Acharya Rajib, and Francis A.J. Zavier. 2012. “Adoption and continuation of contraception following medical or surgical abortion in Bihar and Jharkhand, India,” International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 118(Suppl. 1): 47–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lahteenmaki, P. and Luukkainen T.. 1978. “Return of ovarian function after abortion,” Clinical Endocrinology 8(2): 123–132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lema, V.M. and Mpanga V.. 2000. “Post‐abortion contraceptive acceptability in Blantyre, Malawi,” East African Medical Journal 77(9): 488–493. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Makhlouf et al. 2014. “Adverse pregnancy outcomes among women with prior spontaneous or induced abortions,” American Journal of Perinatology 31(9): 765–772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Malarcher, Shawn and Polis Chelsea B.. 2014. “Using measurement of unmet need to inform program investments for health service integration,” Studies in Family Planning 45(2): 263–275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. McDougall, Janna , Fetters Tamara, Andersen Clark Kathryn, and Rathavy Tung. 2009. “Determinants of contraceptive acceptance among Cambodian abortion patients,” Studies in Family Planning 40(2): 123–132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Medina, R. , Vernon R., Mendoza I., and Aguilar C.. 2001. Expansion of Postpartum/ Postabortion Contraception in Honduras. New York: Population Council. [Google Scholar]
  31. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MOHFW) [India] . 2010. Comprehensive Abortion Care: Training and Service Delivery Guidelines. New Delhi, India.
  32. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MOHFW) [India] . 2013. A strategic approach to reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health (RMNCH+A) in India, New Delhi, India: MOHFW, National Rural Health Mission. [Google Scholar]
  33. Navin, D. , Gulati S., Warvadekar J., and Banerjee Sushanta K.. 2011a. Improving Comprehensive Abortion Care Services in Chhattisgarh through State Government–Ipas Partnership—A Facility Baseline Assessment, 2010. New Delhi, India: Ipas. [Google Scholar]
  34. Navin, D. , Warvadekar J., Gulati S., Banerjee Sushanta K., and Aggarwal P.. 2011b. Improving Comprehensive Abortion Care Services in Meghalaya: A State Government‐Ipas Partnership—A Facility Baseline Assessment, 2010.” New Delhi, India: Ipas. [Google Scholar]
  35. Postabortion Care Consortium Community Task Force . 2002. Essential elements of postabortion care: An expanded and updated model. PAC in Action #2, Special Supplement, September.
  36. Ravindran, T.K. Sundari and Balasubramanian P.. 2004. “‘Yes’ to abortion but ‘no’ to sexual rights: The paradoxical reality of married women in rural Tamil Nadu, India,” Reproductive Health Matters 12(23): 88–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Schreiber, C.A. , Sober S., Ratcliffe S., and Creinin M.D.. 2011. “Ovulation resumption after medical abortion with mife‐pristone and misoprostol,” Contraception 84(3): 230–233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Solo, Julie , Billings Deborah L., Aloo‐Obunga Colette, Ominde Achola, and Makumi Margaret. 1999. “Creating linkages between incomplete abortion treatment and family planning services in Kenya,” Studies in Family Planning 30(1): 17–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Urban Health Initiative (UHI) . 2010. Post Abortion Family Planning: Strategy Brief. Accessed September 2014. www.uhi-india.org.
  40. World Health Organization (WHO) . 2009. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use. Geneva. [PubMed]
  41. World Health Organization (WHO) . 2011. Unsafe Abortion: Global and Regional Estimates of the Incidence of Unsafe Abortion and Associated Mortality in 2008. Geneva.
  42. World Health Organization (WHO) . 2012. Safe Abortion: Technical and Policy Guidance for Health Systems, Second Edition. www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/unsafe_abortion/9789241548434/en/. [PubMed]
  43. Zhu, J.L. , Zhang W.H., Cheng Y., et al. 2009. “Impact of post‐abortion family planning services on contraceptive use and abortion rate among young women in China: A cluster randomised trial,” European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care 14(1): 46–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Studies in Family Planning are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES