Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2016 Jan 25;68(2):337–346. doi: 10.1002/art.39331

Latent Cytomegalovirus Infection in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Increased Frequencies of Cytolytic LIR‐1+CD8+ T Cells

Kathrin Rothe 1, Dagmar Quandt 1, Kristin Schubert 1, Manuela Rossol 1, Maria Klingner 1, Simon Jasinski‐Bergner 2, Roger Scholz 1, Barbara Seliger 2, Matthias Pierer 1, Christoph Baerwald 1, Ulf Wagner 1,✉
PMCID: PMC5066744  PMID: 26314621

Abstract

Objective

Leukocyte immunoglobulin‐like receptor 1 (LIR‐1) is up‐regulated by cytomegalovirus (CMV), which in turn, has been associated with premature aging and more severe joint disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this study was to investigate the expression and functional significance of LIR‐1 in CMV‐positive RA patients.

Methods

We determined the phenotype, cytolytic potential, CMV‐specific proliferation, and HLA–G–triggered, LIR‐1–mediated inhibition of interferon‐γ secretion of LIR‐1+ T cells in RA patients and healthy controls.

Results

We found increased frequencies of CD8+ T cells with CMV pp65–specific T cell receptors in CMV‐positive RA patients as compared to CMV‐positive healthy controls. CMV‐specific CD8+ T cells in these patients were preferentially LIR‐1+ and exhibited a terminally differentiated polyfunctional phenotype. The numbers of LIR‐1+CD8+ T cells increased with age and disease activity, and showed high levels of reactivity to CMV antigens. Ligation of LIR‐1 with soluble HLA–G molecules in vitro confirmed an inhibitory role of the molecule when expressed on CD8+ T cells in RA patients.

Conclusion

We propose that latent CMV infection in the context of a chronic autoimmune response induces the recently described “chronic infection phenotype” in CD8+ T cells, which retains anti‐infectious effector features while exhibiting autoreactive cytolytic potential. This response is likely dampened by LIR‐1 to avoid overwhelming immunopathologic changes in the setting of the autoimmune disease RA. The known deficiency of soluble HLA–G in RA and the observed association of LIR‐1 expression with disease activity suggest, however, that LIR‐1+ T cells are insufficiently controlled in RA and are still likely to be involved in the pathogenesis of the disease.

The human memory T cell compartment is shaped not only by antimicrobial immune responses, but also by autoimmunity and by latent infections with viruses such as cytomegalovirus (CMV) 1. The latter drive the generation of terminally differentiated T cells, which are characterized by the loss of costimulatory molecules such as CD27 and CD28, shortened telomeres, and by the expression of inhibitory natural killer (NK) cell receptors 2. CMV infection in immunocompetent hosts usually runs an asymptomatic course but has been reported to cause massive clonal expansions involving up to 40% of the global T cell pool 3. This increase over time in CMV‐reactive T cells specific for antigens derived from latent CMV has been called memory inflation and involves both the CD4+ and the CD8+ T cell compartment 4, 5. As a consequence, a stable CMV‐reactive T cell compartment with an extremely dynamic cell turnover is established.

Clinically, CMV infection can cause organ‐specific or systemic infections in immunocompromised patients. We and other investigators 6, 7, 8 have shown that the presence of a latent CMV infection influences the clinical course and outcome of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the prototypical T cell–mediated autoimmune disease with severe perturbations of immune homeostasis, particularly in various T lymphocyte compartments. Similar observations have been reported in other autoimmune diseases, such as psoriasis 9, granulomatosis with polyangiitis 10, 11, Alzheimer's disease 12, and systemic lupus erythematosus 13.

Latent CMV infection has been associated with increased expression of the inhibitory NK cell receptor leukocyte immunoglobulin‐like receptor 1 (LIR‐1; also known as immunoglobulin‐like transcript 2 and CD85j, with the gene name LILRB1) on CMV‐reactive CD8+ T cells 14. LIR‐1 belongs to a group of immunoregulatory receptors containing 2–4 immunoreceptor tyrosine‐based inhibitory motifs within the cytoplasmic region. Upon tyrosine phosphorylation, LIR‐1 recruits the SH2 domain–containing phosphatase 1 (SHP‐1) tyrosine phosphatase or SH2 domain–containing inositol‐5′‐phosphatase (SHIP), both of which are involved in negative signaling and inhibition of cell activation 15. Furthermore, LIR‐1 is expressed on almost all immune cells, including antigen‐presenting cells and subsets of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells 16.

During the process of establishing latency following an acute CMV infection, the expression of LIR‐1 on T cells is up‐regulated 17, 18, which results in reduced T cell proliferation in the autologous mixed lymphocyte reaction 19. The increase in LIR‐1 expression after CMV infection is sustained throughout life and is regarded as a marker of premature immune senescence. It has been proposed that in otherwise healthy individuals, up‐regulation of LIR‐1 limits collateral tissue damage due to the sustained, long‐term anti‐CMV immune response 20, or it regulates T cell homeostasis 21. In conjunction with autoimmune conditions, however, LIR‐1 expression appears to have additional and varying implications.

Diminished LIR‐1 expression on B cells and altered functionality on T cells has been reported in systemic lupus erythematosus patients 22. Increased LIR‐1 expression was found on the lymphocytes of patients with autoimmune thyroid disease 23 and multiple sclerosis 24. Genetic polymorphisms of LIR‐1 were found to be associated with RA in patients not expressing RA‐associated HLA–DRB1 alleles 25.

Since the effects of latent CMV infection and chronic immune response converge in patients with RA, we hypothesized that LIR‐1 might be involved in the pathogenesis of the disease. The aim of this study, therefore, was to investigate the expression and functional significance of LIR‐1 in CMV‐positive RA patients. Based on the reported relevance of latent CMV infection to RA disease severity, we focused our study on the phenotype and function of polyfunctional and terminally differentiated CMV‐specific lymphocytes positive for LIR‐1, which is expressed not only on CD4+ T cells, but also, and more prominently, on CD8+ T cells.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients and tissue samples

Patients with RA (n = 63) according to the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism 2010 criteria 26 were recruited from the rheumatology unit of the University of Leipzig. The control group consisted of age‐matched healthy subjects (n = 70). The CMV status of the RA patients and healthy controls was determined by serologic analysis using enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; Medac). This study was approved by the local ethnics committee. Samples of synovium were obtained from patients undergoing synovectomy at the Department of Orthopedics at the University of Leipzig. Synovial tissue T cells were isolated as described previously 27.

Immunofluorescence staining and flow cytometry

T cell phenotyping was performed on freshly isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). The following antibodies were used in different fluorescent conjugates: anti‐CD3 (BW264/56), anti‐CD8 (BW135/80), anti‐CD4 (M‐T466), anti‐CD28 (15E8), anti‐CD27 (M‐T271), anti‐CD31 (AC128), anti‐CD45RA (T6D11), anti‐CD45RO (UCHL‐1), anti‐CCR7 (FR11‐11E8), anti‐CD57 (TB03), anti–programmed death 1 (anti–PD‐1; PD1.3.1.3) (all from Miltenyi Biotec), anti–LIR‐1 (292305 [R&D Systems] and GHI/75 [Miltenyi Biotec]), anti‐IgG1 (11711 [R&D Systems] and IS6‐11E5.11 [Miltenyi Biotec]), anti‐CD3 (SP34‐2; BD Biosciences), and anti–HLA–A2 (BB7.2; AbD Serotec).

Analysis of cells for the expression of surface markers was performed using FACSCalibur and LSR II flow cytometers (BD Biosciences). Data were analyzed with FlowJo software (Tree Star) and CellQuest (BD Biosciences) software. Doublets and dead cells were removed by exclusion of propidium iodide–positive cells.

Dextramer staining

PBMCs from RA patients were isolated by Ficoll‐Paque density‐gradient centrifugation. For determination of CMV‐specific CD8+ T cells, PBMCs from CMV‐positive RA patients and healthy controls were stained for HLA–A2 molecules. PBMCs (5 × 105) from HLA–A2–positive, CMV‐positive RA patients (n = 8) and healthy donors (n = 12) were incubated with fluorescence‐labeled monoclonal antibodies and an appropriate concentration of dextramer complexes for CMV proteins pp65 (CMV pp65/HLA–A*0201NLVPMVATV) and IE‐1 (CMV IE1/HLA–A*0201VLEETSVML) (both from Immudex) in a small volume for 30 minutes at 4°C with protection from the light.

Cytotoxicity assay

Cytolytic CD8+ T cells were analyzed by cell surface mobilization of CD107a (lysosome‐associated membrane protein 1). CD8+ T cells were isolated by positive selection using magnetic‐activated cell sorting (Miltenyi Biotec). CD8‐depleted PBMCs (5 × 106) were loaded with 5 μg of CMV pp65 peptide mixture or control peptide (15‐mers, 11–amino acid overlap; Jerini Peptide Technologies) for 2 hours at 37°C. After washing, target cells and effector CD8+ T cells were seeded at an effector cell–to–target cell ratio of 4:1. Cytotoxicity assays were performed at 37°C for 4 hours in the presence of 0.0125 μg of CD107a antibody (Alexa Fluor 488–conjugated; BioLegend). Staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB; 1 μg/ml) (Sigma) was used as a positive control. Medium alone was used as an unstimulated control. After 1 hour of coculture, monensin (2 μM; eBioscience) or GolgiStop (2 μM; BD Biosciences) was added for the last 3 hours of cell culture. Subsequently, cells were stained and measured by fluorescence‐activated cell sorting (FACS). Dead cells were removed by exclusion of propidium iodide–positive cells. Only experiments with >0.2% CD107a+CD8+ T cells were included in the statistical analysis.

Proliferation assay

The fluorescence‐based proliferation analysis was performed by labeling PBMCs with 3 μg/ml of 5,6‐carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (Molecular Probes) or 10 μM Cell Proliferation dye eFluor 670 (eBioscience). Cells (2 × 106) were cultured for 7 days in the presence of 1 μg/ml of CMV lysate or control lysate (Microbix Biosystems) or 1 μg/ml of SEB (Sigma) as a positive control, in X‐Vivo 15 medium (Lonza) containing 2 mM l‐glutamine, 100 units/ml of penicillin, and 100 μg/ml of streptomycin.

Soluble HLA–G inhibition assay

The HLA–G positive choriocarcinoma cell line JEG‐3 (HTB‐36; ATCC) was stably transfected with the expression vectors of the HLA–G targeting microRNA‐152 and with the respective mock vector (as a control), as previously described 28. Soluble HLA–G–containing and HLA–G–free cell culture supernatants were collected and stored at −80°C until time for use. A protein concentration step was applied, and the soluble HLA–G content was determined by ELISA (Exbio). For inhibition assays, CD8+ T cells were stimulated with 2 μg/ml of anti‐CD3 for 6 hours in the presence of 5 μl of supernatant containing soluble HLA–G. Supernatant without soluble HLA–G was used as a control. Cells were subsequently stained and measured by FACS analysis. Dead cells were removed by exclusion of propidium iodide–positive cells. Intracellular staining of interferon‐γ (IFNγ) was performed using an Inside Staining kit (Miltenyi Biotec).

Statistical analysis

GraphPad Prism 5.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Prior to all comparisons, a normality test was performed. Between‐group differences in medians or means were analyzed by Student's t‐test or the Mann‐Whitney rank sum test as appropriate. Correlations were evaluated using Pearson's product‐moment correlation or Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

Analysis of CMV‐specific CD8+ T cells in RA patients and controls

We reported previously that CMV‐reactive CD4+ T cells, which secrete IFNγ in response to CMV antigen, are more frequent in RA patients than in healthy controls 7. To investigate the consequences of latent CMV infection for the CD8+ T cell compartment in RA, the frequency of CMV‐specific CD8+ T cells was determined using CMV pp65–specific dextramers and was found to be increased in RA patients positive for CMV and anti–cyclic citrullinated peptide as compared to CMV‐positive healthy controls (Figure 1A). Latent CMV infection is known to cause memory inflation, with a concomitant increase in polyfunctional, terminally differentiated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells with pathologic phenotypes 5, 29. As an example of such a phenotype, we analyzed the frequencies of CD28– T cells and found an increase in both the CD4 and the CD8 T cell compartments in CMV‐positive as compared to CMV‐negative RA patients (Figure 1B).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Increased frequencies of cytomegalovirus (CMV)–specific dextramer–positive CD8+ T cells and LIR‐1+CD8+ T cells in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A, Frequency of CMV pp65/HLA–A*0201NLVPMVATV dextramer–positive CD8+ T cells in healthy donors (HD; n = 12) and RA patients (n = 8). Each symbol represents an individual sample; horizontal lines and error bars show the mean ± SEM. B, Frequency of CD28–CD8+ T cells in CMV‐negative and CMV‐positive healthy donors (n = 8 and n = 57) and CMV‐negative and CMV‐positive RA patients (n = 20 and n = 50). C and D, Frequency of LIR‐1+ T cells in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from healthy donors (n = 63) and RA patients (n = 70) (C) and in CD8+ T cells from CMV‐positive and CMV‐negative healthy donors (n = 49 and n = 11) and RA patients (n = 51 and n = 19) (D). Data in B–D are shown as box plots. Each box represents the 25th to 75th percentiles. Lines inside the boxes represent the median. Whiskers represent the 10th and 90th percentiles. Solid circles indicate outliers. Except where indicated otherwise, frequencies are given as the percentage of total CD8+ T cells.

Analysis of LIR‐1+CD8+ T cells in RA patients and controls

CMV infection is known to induce overexpression of LIR‐1. In RA patients and healthy control subjects, CD8+ T cells express LIR‐1 more frequently than do CD4+ T cells, as previously reported 20 and as confirmed by the findings of our present study (Figure 1C). Surprisingly, LIR‐1 expression on CD8+ T cells in RA patients was even higher than that in healthy controls. This increase was most pronounced in CMV‐positive RA patients as compared to CMV‐positive controls (Figure 1D). In CMV‐negative RA patients, a trend toward increased frequencies of LIR‐1+CD8+ T cells was discernible, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.085).

LIR‐1+CD8+ T cells were also quantified in the affected joints of RA patients and were found in significant numbers, both in rheumatoid synovium and in synovial fluid, although the frequencies in the synovial membrane were lower than those in the peripheral blood (P not significant) (data not shown).

Analysis of LIR‐1 expression on CMV pp65–specific CD8+ T cells revealed increased LIR‐1+ cells among dextramer‐positive CD8+ T cells from RA patients as compared to controls (Figures 2A and B). Importantly, LIR‐1 expression levels were also significantly higher on dextramer‐negative CD8+ T cells from RA patients as compared to controls (Figure 2C). In RA patients, more CD8+ T cells were CMV pp65 specific, both among LIR‐1+ and LIR‐1– cells (Figure 2D). Determination of CD8+ T cells specific for CMV IE‐1 revealed very low frequencies, both in RA patients and in healthy individuals (data not shown).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Increased frequencies of leukocyte immunoglobulin‐like receptor 1 (LIR‐1)–positive cells among cytomegalovirus (CMV)–specific dextramer–positive CD8+ T cells in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A, Representative dot plot of dextramer CMV pp65 binding to CD8+ T cells (left) and representative histogram of LIR‐1 expression on dextramer‐positive CD8+ T cells (right). B, Frequencies of LIR‐1+ cells among dextramer‐positive CD8+ T cells from healthy donors (HD; n = 10) and from anti–cyclic citrullinated peptide–positive RA patients (n = 5). C, Fluorescence intensity of LIR‐1 expression on dextramer‐positive and dextramer‐negative CD8+ T cells. D, Frequency of CMV pp65–specific dextramer–positive cells among LIR‐1+ and LIR‐1– CD8+ T cells from healthy donors (n = 10) and RA patients (n = 4). Values are the mean ± SEM. Data in B and D are shown as box plots. Each box represents the 25th to 75th percentiles. Lines inside the boxes represent the median. Whiskers represent the 10th and 90th percentiles. Solid circles indicate outliers.

The frequencies of LIR‐1+CD8+ T cells were found to increase with age (Figure 3A), as reported previously 18. Of note, however, the frequencies of LIR‐1+CD8+ T cells were also higher when only subjects younger than age 50 years were compared (Figure 3B). Clinically, increased frequencies of LIR‐1+CD8+ T cells were found to be associated with higher levels of disease activity, as indicated by a significant positive correlation with the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (Figure 3C).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Influence of age and disease activity on frequencies of LIR‐1+CD8+ T cells in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A, Correlation of the frequencies of LIR‐1+CD8+ T cells in the peripheral blood of 35 RA patients by age group. B, Frequency of LIR‐1+CD8+ T cells in the peripheral blood of RA patients and healthy donors (HD) in 3 age groups: ≤50 years (n = 13 and n = 8, respectively), 51–70 years (n = 24 and n = 37, respectively), and >70 years (n = 16 and n = 7, respectively). Data are shown as box plots. Each box represents the 25th to 75th percentiles. Lines inside the boxes represent the median. Whiskers represent the 10th and 90th percentiles. Solid circles indicate outliers. C, Correlation of the frequencies of LIR‐1+CD8+ T cells in the peripheral blood of 14 RA patients by Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28). All frequencies are given as the percentage of total CD8+ T cells.

Phenotyping of LIR‐1+CD8+ T cells

Repeated chronic immune responses often result in polyfunctional, terminally differentiated, and possibly exhausted T cell phenotypes, such as the CD4+CD7–CD28– T cell subset originally described in RA 30 or the CD8+CD27−CD28− T cell subset 1. Phenotype characterization of LIR‐1+CD8+ T cells from RA patients by flow cytometry revealed them to be preferentially CD27–CD28– and CD28–CD57+ and to contain increased frequencies of CD45RA+CCR7– effector T cells. Furthermore, LIR‐1+CD8+ T cells more frequently express the NK cell marker CD56 than do LIR‐1– T cells. Analysis of the “exhaustion” marker PD‐1 revealed no difference in its expression on LIR‐1+CD8+ T cells as compared to LIR‐1– T cells (Figure 4A). Expression of the fractalkine receptor CX3CR1, which enables T cells to migrate into the rheumatoid synovium 31, was also increased on LIR‐1+CD8+ T cells from RA patients as compared to LIR‐1–CD8+ T cells from RA patients and from healthy controls (Figure 4B). The chemokine receptor CCR5, which is also associated with latent virus infection and an effector phenotype of T cells 32, was not differentially expressed on LIR‐1+ T cells from RA patients as compared to healthy controls (Figure 4C).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Phenotypic characterization of LIR‐1+CD8+ T cells in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A, Frequencies of CD27–CD28– T cells, CD28–CD57+ T cells, CD45RA+CCR7– T cells, programmed death 1 (PD‐1)–positive T cells, and CD56+ T cells in LIR‐1+CD8+ and LIR‐1–CD8+ T cell subsets in RA patients. Each symbol represents an individual sample; horizontal lines and error bars show the mean ± SEM. B and C, Frequencies of chemokine receptors CX3CR1+ (B) and CCR5+ (C) among LIR‐1+CD8+ T cells and LIR‐1–CD8+ T cells from RA patients (n = 9) and healthy donors (HD; n = 8). Data are shown as box plots. Each box represents the 25th to 75th percentiles. Lines inside the boxes represent the median. Whiskers represent the 10th and 90th percentiles. Solid circle indicates an outlier. LIR‐1 = leukocyte immunoglobulin‐like receptor 1.

Functional characterization of LIR‐1+CD8+ T cells in RA

Inhibitory immune receptors, such as LIR‐1, are expressed on T cells, where they control the magnitude of the immune response after activation. We therefore analyzed the regulation of LIR‐1 expression in vitro, the effector status of LIR‐1+CD8+ T cells, and the inhibitory effect of the LIR‐1 molecule on CD8+ T cells from RA patients.

To gain insight into the regulation of LIR‐1, PBMCs from RA patients were stimulated in vitro for 6 days using various stimuli. The expression of LIR‐1 on CD8+ T cells was down‐regulated after 2 days without exogenous stimuli. Expression could be maintained for 4 days with anti‐CD3, and it remained detectable even after 6 days of culture in the presence of CMV lysate or phytohemagglutinin (data not shown).

Functionally, the cytolytic potential of LIR‐1+CD8+ T cells was determined by CD107a mobilization assay using flow cytometry. Significantly higher expression of CD107a in response to CMV pp65–loaded PBMCs was detected on CD8+ T cells from RA patients as compared to healthy controls, indicating increased CMV‐specific cytolytic potential (Figures 5A and B). Control peptide–loaded antigen‐presenting cells could not induce CD107a expression in CD8+ T cells (data not shown). In healthy controls and RA patients, increased cytolytic potential was mainly found in LIR‐1+CD8+ T cells.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Functional analysis of LIR‐1+CD8+ T cells in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A and B, CD107a‐degranulation assay. The representative histogram in A shows CD107a expression on CD8+ T cells after restimulation with cytomegalovirus (CMV) pp65 peptide–loaded, staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB; positive control)–loaded, or control peptide–loaded antigen‐presenting cells (left). The percentage of CD107a+CD8+ T cells is also shown (right). In B, the percentage of IFNγ+CD107a+CD8+ T cells from RA patients (n = 5) and healthy donors (HD; n = 5) is shown. C and D, Proliferation of LIR‐1+CD8+ T cells from CMV‐positive healthy donors and RA patients. The representative histogram in C shows proliferation of LIR‐1+CD8+ T cells after restimulation with CMV lysate (1 μg/ml) or control lysate (left). The proliferation rate of CD8+ T cells incubated with CMV lysate or control lysate from healthy donors (n = 12) and patients with RA (n = 8) is also shown (right). In D, the percentage of proliferated LIR‐1–CD8+ and LIR‐1+CD8+ cells from healthy donors (n = 12) and RA patients (n = 8) in response to CMV lysate is shown. Data in A (right), C (right), and D are shown as box plots. Each box represents the 25th to 75th percentiles. Lines inside the boxes represent the median. Whiskers represent the 10th and 90th percentiles. Solid circles indicate outliers. In B, each symbol represents an individual sample; horizontal lines and error bars show the mean ± SEM.

The proliferative potential of LIR‐1+CD8+ T cells after stimulation with CMV lysate was also quantified in vitro (Figures 5C and D). LIR‐1+CD8+ T cells were not found to be proliferatively exhausted, since they mounted a robust proliferative response to CMV lysate, which exceeded the proliferation rates of LIR‐1–CD8+ T cells both in RA patients and in healthy controls (Figure 5D). Despite their enhanced cytolytic potential, however, CD8+ T cells from RA patients did not show an increased proliferation rate as compared to healthy controls (Figure 5C).

Soluble HLA–G is a ligand of LIR‐1 and is known to evoke an inhibitory signal in most cell types. In patients with RA, decreased serum levels of soluble HLA–G have been reported 33, which may contribute to autoimmunity. Hence, we investigated the responsiveness of RA CD8+ T cells by triggering LIR‐1. Addition of exogenous soluble HLA–G in vitro led to decreased frequencies of CD107a+CD8+ T cells (Figures 6A and B), indicating that the inhibitory signal triggered by ligation of LIR‐1 would be effective if sufficient soluble HLA–G molecules were available in RA. Furthermore, intracellular IFNγ expression in CD8+ T cells was also down‐regulated in cultures with soluble HLA–G (Figure 6C).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Inhibition of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by soluble HLA–G (sHLA–G). A, Inhibition of CD107a expression after the addition of medium alone, soluble HLA–G (5 μl), or anti‐CD3 control to in vitro cultures of CD8+ T cells. Values are the mean ± SEM of 3 samples per group. B and C, Representative histograms showing the frequencies of CD107a+CD8+ T cells (B) and the expression of intracellular interferon‐γ (IFNγ) on CD8+ T cells (C) from RA patients after in vitro activation in medium or soluble HLA–G–containing or control supernatants.

DISCUSSION

Latent CMV infection and RA share several phenotypical features in the T cell compartment. In addition, the clinical impact of CMV infection on the RA disease course has previously been reported 6, 7, 8. We describe herein a population of CD8+ T cells in CMV‐positive RA patients that exhibits proinflammatory, cytolytic, and antiviral features and is functionally inhibited due to up‐regulated expression of LIR‐1.

In healthy individuals, expression of LIR‐1 on CD8+ T cells is up‐regulated by CMV infection, possibly with the goal of limiting collateral tissue damage due to the longstanding immune response against the latent virus or, alternatively, as a homeostatic mechanism 6, 7, 8. We found that the frequency of LIR‐1+CD8+ T cells was significantly higher in CMV‐positive RA patients than in CMV‐positive healthy controls and that it increased not only with age, but also with higher levels of disease activity. In addition, LIR‐1 was up‐regulated on CD8+ T cells that were not specific for CMV antigens.

In healthy individuals, lymphocytes involved in memory inflation tend to acquire a specific phenotype, which was previously described as “exhaustive.” More recently, it has been suggested that this “chronic infection phenotype” represents a population of T cells that can still efficiently control latent infection, while certain levels of effector function are diminished to prevent overwhelming immunopathologic changes due to collateral autoreactivity 34. Increased LIR‐1 expression on CD8+ T cells is likely to represent such a CMV‐induced chronic infection phenotype, since it is linked to latent CMV infection in healthy individuals 18. Our results show that in comparison to healthy controls, LIR‐1 was further up‐regulated on CD8+ T cells in RA patients. In this autoimmune disease, increased LIR‐1 expression could result from an insufficiently controlled latent CMV infection, leading to higher numbers of T cells, which are required and recruited, or it could represent a regulatory mechanism aimed at controlling autoimmunity in RA in the context of latent CMV infection.

The functional analysis confirmed that LIR‐1+ T cells in RA are polyfunctional and have cytolytic potential. Their higher expression of CD56 and CD57, which is associated with increased cytotoxicity in CMV‐seropositive healthy individuals 1, 35, might further increase their cytolytic potential in RA. Phenotype analysis using the T cell differentiation markers CCR7 and CD45RA confirmed that LIR‐1+CD8+ T cells are effector T cells. In addition, their expression of CX3CR1, which is known to be up‐regulated on CMV‐specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from healthy individuals 36, might enable them to migrate toward fractalkine gradients, which has been reported to occur in the rheumatoid synovium 31. Differences in PD‐1 expression between LIR‐1+ and LIR‐1– CD8+ T cells were not significant.

In phases of CMV reactivation or of relevant suppression of the controlling immune response, the CMV‐specific LIR‐1+CD8+ T cells appear to be able to mount a cytolytic immune response. Numerically, only 25% of the CMV pp65–specific CD8+ T cells are LIR‐1+, and <10% of LIR‐1+ cells are specific for the immunodominant CMV antigen pp65. Even assuming that another 10% of LIR‐1+ cells recognize other CMV antigens, it still leaves the majority of LIR‐1+CD8+ T cells unreactive to CMV. The observation that LIR‐1 overexpression is also found on T cells that are not reactive to CMV antigens and possibly even on T cells from CMV‐negative RA patients indicates that CMV‐independent factors related to the chronic autoimmune disease are also involved.

Our finding of increased proliferative activity is evidence against the interpretation that expression of LIR‐1 on CD8+ T cells is the equivalent of T cell exhaustion, since T cell exhaustion is generally regarded to be accompanied by low proliferative capacity 37, 38. Our observation is consistent with a similar study showing increased proliferative capacity of LIR‐1+CD8+ T cells from healthy controls 14. In RA, exaggerated proliferative replication of LIR‐1+CD8+ T cells could even contribute to the observed increase in the frequency of CMV‐specific dextramer–positive CD8+ T cells, possibly due to a failure to “switch off” ongoing immune responses. Alternatively, the increased frequency of CMV‐specific T cells could be a consequence of globally increased T cell proliferation leading to replicative senescence in this disease 39, but this latter explanation is partially contradicted by the increased proliferation among LIR‐1+CD8+ T cells.

LIR‐1 remains functional as an inhibitory receptor in RA, since we found LIR‐1 ligation by soluble HLA–G to block cytotoxicity in our experiments. Antigen recognition by CD8+ T cells requires antigen‐presenting major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules to interact with T cell receptors and CD8 coreceptors within the tightly organized and spatially focused immunologic synapse. Those MHC class I molecules are ligands for LIR‐1, and when LIR‐1 is recruited to the immunologic synapse, it exerts a strong inhibitory effect, even more so if it encounters the viral high‐affinity ligand UL18, which is expressed on the juxtaposed cells in latent CMV infection 40. Accordingly, up‐regulation of the inhibitory receptor LIR‐1 in RA could be an attempt to limit autoreactivity in order to alleviate the autoimmune disease.

Soluble HLA–G has been reported to be reduced in RA 33 and has been implicated in the pathogenesis of RA by the associations of its genetic polymorphisms with disease susceptibility 41. Latent CMV infection down‐regulates HLA–G expression 42, and decreased levels of soluble HLA–G, in turn, could cause LIR‐1+CD8+ T cells in RA to become hyperactive.

Taken together, our data suggest that the intricate network and finely tuned crosstalk of UL18, HLA–G, and classic MHC class I molecules with LIR‐1 is disturbed during the course of a CMV infection in RA. As a consequence, deficiency of soluble HLA–G might diminish the inhibitory effects of LIR‐1 on CD8+ T cells in CMV‐positive RA patients. LIR‐1+CD8+ T cells, in turn, could also be involved in the pathogenesis of RA by contributing directly to chronic inflammation. The observed significant correlation of the frequency of LIR‐1+CD8+ T cells with disease activity strongly supports this hypothesis. At the same time, those cells might still be involved in the immunologic control of the latent CMV infection, which illustrates possible unwanted side effects of immunosuppression in this disease.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

All authors were involved in drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content, and all authors approved the final version to be published. Dr. Wagner had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Study conception and design

Rothe, Quandt, Pierer, Wagner.

Acquisition of data

Rothe, Schubert, Rossol, Klingner, Jasinski‐Bergner, Scholz, Seliger, Pierer, Baerwald, Wagner.

Analysis and interpretation of data

Rothe, Quandt, Schubert, Seliger, Wagner.

Supporting information

Supporting Information

Click here for additional data file. (69.8MB, docx)

REFERENCES

  • 1. Strioga M, Pasukoniene V, Characiejus D. CD8+ CD28− and CD8+ CD57+ T cells and their role in health and disease. Immunology 2011;134:17–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Akbar AN, Fletcher JM. Memory T cell homeostasis and senescence during aging. Curr Opin Immunol 2005;17:480–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Sylwester AW, Mitchell BL, Edgar JB, Taormina C, Pelte C, Ruchti F, et al. Broadly targeted human cytomegalovirus‐specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells dominate the memory compartments of exposed subjects. J Exp Med 2005;202:673–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Chidrawar S, Khan N, Wei W, McLarnon A, Smith N, Nayak L, et al. Cytomegalovirus‐seropositivity has a profound influence on the magnitude of major lymphoid subsets within healthy individuals. Clin Exp Immunol 2009;155:423–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Snyder CM, Cho KS, Bonnett EL, van Dommelen S, Shellam GR, Hill AB. Memory inflation during chronic viral infection is maintained by continuous production of short‐lived, functional T cells. Immunity 2008;29:650–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Davis JM III, Knutson KL, Skinner JA, Strausbauch MA, Crowson CS, Therneau TM, et al. A profile of immune response to herpesvirus is associated with radiographic joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 2012;14:R24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Pierer M, Rothe K, Quandt D, Schulz A, Rossol M, Scholz R, et al. Association of anticytomegalovirus seropositivity with more severe joint destruction and more frequent joint surgery in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2012;64:1740–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Davis JM, Knutson KL, Strausbauch MA, Green AB, Crowson CS, Therneau TM, et al. Immune response profiling in early rheumatoid arthritis: discovery of a novel interaction of treatment response with viral immunity. Arthritis Res Ther 2013;15:R199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Weitz M, Kiessling C, Friedrich M, Prosch S, Hoflich C, Kern F, et al. Persistent CMV infection correlates with disease activity and dominates the phenotype of peripheral CD8+ T cells in psoriasis. Exp Dermatol 2011;20:561–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Eriksson P, Sandell C, Backteman K, Ernerudh J. Expansions of CD4+CD28− and CD8+CD28− T cells in granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis are associated with cytomegalovirus infection but not with disease activity. J Rheumatol 2012;39:1840–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Lamprecht P, Vargas Cuero AL, Muller A, Csernok E, Voswinkel J, Maass M, et al. Alterations in the phenotype of CMV‐specific and total CD8+ T cell populations in Wegener's granulomatosis. Cell Immunol 2003;224:1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Westman G, Berglund D, Widen J, Ingelsson M, Korsgren O, Lannfelt L, et al. Increased inflammatory response in cytomegalovirus seropositive patients with Alzheimer's disease. PLoS One 2014;9:e96779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Soderberg‐Naucler C. Autoimmunity induced by human cytomegalovirus in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Res Ther 2012;14:101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Anfossi N, Doisne J, Peyrat M, Ugolini S, Bonnaud O, Bossy D, et al. Coordinated expression of Ig‐like inhibitory MHC class I receptors and acquisition of cytotoxic function in human CD8+ T cells. J Immunol 2004;173:7223–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Sayos J, Martinez‐Barriocanal A, Kitzig F, Bellon T, Lopez‐Botet M. Recruitment of C‐terminal Src kinase by the leukocyte inhibitory receptor CD85j. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2004;324:640–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Colonna M, Navarro F, Bellon T, Llano M, Garcia P, Samaridis J, et al. A common inhibitory receptor for major histocompatibility complex class I molecules on human lymphoid and myelomonocytic cells. J Exp Med 1997;186:1809–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Monsivais‐Urenda A, Noyola‐Cherpitel D, Hernandez‐Salinas A, Garcia‐Sepulveda C, Romo N, Baranda L, et al. Influence of human cytomegalovirus infection on the NK cell receptor repertoire in children. Eur J Immunol 2010;40:1418–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Northfield J, Lucas M, Jones H, Young NT, Klenerman P. Does memory improve with age? CD85j (ILT‐2/LIR‐1) expression on CD8 T cells correlates with ‘memory inflation’ in human cytomegalovirus infection. Immunol Cell Biol 2005;83:182–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Wagner CS, Walther‐Jallow L, Buentke E, Ljunggren H, Achour A, Chambers BJ. Human cytomegalovirus‐derived protein UL18 alters the phenotype and function of monocyte‐derived dendritic cells. J Leuk Biol 2008;83:56–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Saverino D, Fabbi M, Ghiotto F, Merlo A, Bruno S, Zarcone D, et al. The CD85/LIR‐1/ILT2 inhibitory receptor is expressed by all human T lymphocytes and down‐regulates their functions. J Immunol 2000;165:3742–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Young NT, Uhrberg M. KIR expression shapes cytotoxic repertoires: a developmental program of survival. Trends Immunol 2002;23:71–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Monsivais‐Urenda A, Nino‐Moreno P, Abud‐Mendoza C, Baranda L, Layseca‐Espinosa E, Lopez‐Botet M, et al. Analysis of expression and function of the inhibitory receptor ILT2 (CD85j/LILRB1/LIR‐1) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). J Autoimmun 2007;29:97–105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Doniz‐Padilla L, Paniagua AE, Sandoval‐Correa P, Monsivais‐Urenda A, Leskela S, Marazuela M, et al. Analysis of expression and function of the inhibitory receptor ILT2 in lymphocytes from patients with autoimmune thyroid disease. Eur J Endocrinol 2011;165:129–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Martinez‐Rodriguez JE, Saez‐Borderias A, Munteis E, Romo N, Roquer J, Lopez‐Botet M. Natural killer receptors distribution in multiple sclerosis: relation to clinical course and interferon‐β therapy. Clin Immunol 2010;137:41–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Kuroki K, Tsuchiya N, Shiroishi M, Rasubala L, Yamashita Y, Matsuta K, et al. Extensive polymorphisms of LILRB1 (ILT2, LIR1) and their association with HLA–DRB1 shared epitope negative rheumatoid arthritis. Hum Mol Genet 2005;14:2469–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felson DT, Bingham CO III, et al. 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum 2010; 62:2569–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Rossol M, Schubert K, Meusch U, Schulz A, Biedermann B, Grosche J, et al. Tumor necrosis factor receptor type I expression of CD4+ T cells in rheumatoid arthritis enables them to follow tumor necrosis factor gradients into the rheumatoid synovium. Arthritis Rheum 2013;65:1468–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Jasinski‐Bergner S, Stehle F, Gonschorek E, Kalich J, Schulz K, Huettelmaier S, et al. Identification of 14‐3‐3β gene as a novel miR‐152 target using a proteome‐based approach. J Biol Chem 2014;289:31121–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Karrer U, Sierro S, Wagner M, Oxenius A, Hengel H, Koszinowski UH, et al. Memory inflation: continuous accumulation of antiviral CD8+ T cells over time. J Immunol 2003;170:2022–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Schmidt D, Goronzy JJ, Weyand CM. CD4+ CD7− CD28− T cells are expanded in rheumatoid arthritis and are characterized by autoreactivity. J Clin Invest 1996;97:2027–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Nanki T, Imai T, Nagasaka K, Urasaki Y, Nonomura Y, Taniguchi K, et al. Migration of CX3CR1‐positive T cells producing type 1 cytokines and cytotoxic molecules into the synovium of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2002;46:2878–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Fukada K, Sobao Y, Tomiyama H, Oka S, Takiguchi M. Functional expression of the chemokine receptor CCR5 on virus epitope‐specific memory and effector CD8+ T cells. J Immunol 2002;168:2225–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Verbruggen LA, Rebmann V, Demanet C, de Cock S, Grosse‐Wilde H. Soluble HLA–G in rheumatoid arthritis. Hum Immunol 2006;67:561–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Speiser DE, Utzschneider DT, Oberle SG, Munz C, Romero P, Zehn D. T cell differentiation in chronic infection and cancer: functional adaptation or exhaustion? Nat Rev Immunol 2014;14:768–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Almehmadi M, Flanagan BF, Khan N, Alomar S, Christmas SE. Increased numbers and functional activity of CD56+ T cells in healthy cytomegalovirus positive subjects. Immunology 2014;142:258–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Hertoghs KM, Moerland PD, van Stijn A, Remmerswaal EB, Yong SL, van de Berg PJ, et al. Molecular profiling of cytomegalovirus‐induced human CD8+ T cell differentiation. J Clin Invest 2010;120:4077–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Brenchley JM, Karandikar NJ, Betts MR, Ambrozak DR, Hill BJ, Crotty LE, et al. Expression of CD57 defines replicative senescence and antigen‐induced apoptotic death of CD8+ T cells. Blood 2003;101:2711–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Joshi NS, Kaech SM. Effector CD8 T cell development: a balancing act between memory cell potential and terminal differentiation. J Immunol 2008;180:1309–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Weyand CM, Yang Z, Goronzy JJ. T cell aging in rheumatoid arthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2014;26:93–100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Yang Z, Bjorkman PJ. Structure of UL18, a peptide‐binding viral MHC mimic, bound to a host inhibitory receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;105:10095–100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Veit TD, Vianna P, Scheibel I, Brenol CV, Brenol JC, Xavier RM, et al. Association of the HLA–G 14‐bp insertion/deletion polymorphism with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Tissue Antigens 2008;71:440–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Pizzato N, Garmy‐Susini B, Le Bouteiller P, Lenfant F. Down‐regulation of HLA–G1 cell surface expression in human cytomegalovirus infected cells. Am J Reprod Immunol 2003;50:328–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

Click here for additional data file. (69.8MB, docx)

Articles from Arthritis & Rheumatology (Hoboken, N.j.) are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES