Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Translational Psychiatry logoLink to Translational Psychiatry
. 2015 Sep 22;5(9):e644. doi: 10.1038/tp.2015.147

Early-life serotonin dysregulation affects the migration and positioning of cortical interneuron subtypes

S Frazer 1,2, K Otomo 1,2, A Dayer 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC5068808  PMID: 26393490

Abstract

Early-life deficiency of the serotonin transporter (SERT) gives rise to a wide range of psychiatric-relevant phenotypes; however, the molecular and cellular targets of serotonin dyregulation during neural circuit formation remain to be identified. Interestingly, migrating cortical interneurons (INs) derived from the caudal ganglionic eminence (CGE) have been shown to be more responsive to serotonin-mediated signalling compared with INs derived from the medial ganglionic eminence (MGE). Here we investigated the impact of early-life SERT deficiency on the migration and positioning of CGE-derived cortical INs in SERT-ko mice and in mice exposed to the SERT inhibitor fluoxetine during the late embryonic period. Using confocal time-lapse imaging and microarray-based expression analysis we found that genetic and pharmacological SERT deficiency significantly increased the migratory speed of CGE-derived INs and affected transcriptional programmes regulating neuronal migration. Postnatal studies revealed that SERT deficiency altered the cortical laminar distribution of subtypes of CGE-derived INs but not MGE-derived INs. More specifically, we found that the distribution of vasointestinal peptide (VIP)-expressing INs in layer 2/3 was abnormal in both genetic and pharmacological SERT-deficiency models. Collectively, these data indicate that early-life SERT deficiency has an impact on the migration and molecular programmes of CGE-derived INs, thus leading to specific alterations in the positioning of VIP-expressing INs. These data add to the growing evidence that early-life serotonin dysregulation affects cortical microcircuit formation and contributes to the emergence of psychiatric-relevant phenotypes.

Introduction

Vulnerability to psychiatric disorders is likely to be determined by early-life alterations in the formation and plasticity of neural circuits. Cortical microcircuits emerge through sequential cellular events involving the coordinated integration of a wide diversity of neurons in a laminated structure.1 Cortical neuron subtypes have different embryonic origins and reach their final cortical laminar position through the process of neuronal migration.1, 2 Glutamatergic pyramidal neurons are generated in the ventricular zone of the dorsal pallium and migrate radially towards the pial surface, whereas GABAergic cortical interneurons (INs) are born in a variety of subpallial microdomains and reach the developing cortex through tangential migration.2, 3 Alterations in the migration, maturation and function of GABAergic cortical INs have been detected in rodent models of psychiatric disorders and in post-mortem brain tissue from patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.3, 4, 5, 6

Among early-life signalling pathways involved in the cortical circuit assembly, the serotonin system has been shown to regulate different types of cellular processes including neuronal migration and thalamocortical wiring.7, 8, 9 Serotonin is detected as early as embryonic day (E)10.5 in the mouse forebrain and levels gradually rise during embryonic development.10 In rodents, constitutive genetic deletion of the serotonin transporter (SERT) or pharmacological blockade of SERT through exposure to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) at prenatal or early postnatal time points gives rise to a variety of persistent behavioural alterations including increased anxiety-like, depressive-like and autistic-like phenotypes.11, 12, 13, 14 In humans and non-human primates, a hypofunctional genetic variant in the SERT promoter region (5-HTTLPR, short allele) interacts with early-life adversity to increase risk for affective dysregulation15, 16, 17, 18 and modulates emotional circuits.19, 20 Finally, prenatal exposure of fetuses to antidepressants such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors has been recently shown to increase risk for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder21 and possibly autism spectrum disorders.22, 23 Collectively, human and rodent data indicate that SERT deficiency during development constitutes a risk factor for psychiatric-related outcomes. However, the molecular and cell-type-specific mechanisms that link early-life SERT deficiency to psychiatric-relevant phenotypes remain to be understood.

Here we aimed to determine whether early-life SERT deficiency affects the migration and laminar positioning of cortical IN subtypes. Interestingly, a subset of cortical INs (~30%) derived from the caudal ganglionic eminence (CGE) but not from the medial ganglionic eminence (MGE) express the serotonin receptor 3A (5-HT3AR).24, 25, 26 Recent work from our laboratory has shown that the 5-HT3AR specifically controls the embryonic migration and laminar positioning of CGE but not MGE-derived cortical INs.26 We thus aimed to determine whether the migration and transcriptional programmes of CGE-derived INs are affected in homozygous SERT-ko mice and in mice exposed to the SERT inhibitor fluoxetine from E14.5 to birth. Using time-lapse imaging and microarray-based gene expression analysis we found that SERT deficiency affected the migratory dynamics of CGE-derived INs as well as a core set of genes involved in regulating neuronal migration. Furthermore, quantification at the postnatal time point indicated that early-life SERT deficiency specifically affected the laminar positioning of CGE-derived INs expressing vasointestinal peptide (VIP) or neuropeptide Y (NPY) but not MGE-derived INs expressing parvalbumin (PV) or somatostatin (SST). Taken together, these data indicate that CGE-derived INs constitute an important cellular target of early-life serotonin dysregulation and that alteration in their migration and positioning could potentially contribute to the complex behavioural deficits induced by early-life SERT deficiency.

Materials and methods

Animals

Animal experiments were conducted according to the Swiss and international guidelines and were approved by the local Geneva animal care committee. Adult timed-pregnant mice were obtained by overnight (ON) mating and the following morning was counted as E0.5. Transgenic mice expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) under the control of the GAD65 regulatory sequences (GAD65-GFP) were used to label CGE-derived cortical INs.27 GAD65-GFP mice were maintained on a C57BL/6 background. Timed-pregnant C57BL/6 mice were either obtained from Charles River Laboratories (Saint-Germain-Nuelles, France) or bred in-house. To study genetic SERT deficiency, SERT-ko mice28 maintained on a C57BL/6 background were crossed with the GAD65-GFP mice to obtain SERT-ko; GAD65-GFP animals.

Drug administration

To reduce handling and injection stress, custom-made pellets (Innovative Research of America, Sarasota, FL, USA) were used to deliver fluoxetine continuously for 5 days at a clinically relevant dose (20 mg kg−1 per day as previously described29). E14.5 GAD65-GFP pregnant dams were implanted subcutaneously with a fluoxetine pellet under brief 1% isoflurane anaesthesia. Control GAD65-GFP mice and SERT-ko; GAD65-GFP mice were implanted with a placebo pellet to control for potential confounding effects of surgery and anaesthesia.

High-performance liquid chromatography

After giving birth, mice with fluoxetine pellets (n=4 from two separate dams) were killed by lethal intraperitoneal injection of pentobarbital (100 mg kg−1) and blood from the right atrium was collected in lithium–heparin columns (Microvette, Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany). After centrifugation, the supernatant was stored at −20 °C until further analysis. Brains were extracted and sonicated in ddH2O. Concentration of fluoxetine was determined with high-performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry at the Geneva University Hospital.

Time-lapse imaging of neuronal migration

Time-lapse imaging of IN migration was performed on E17.5 cortical slices from SERT-ko; GAD65-GFP embryos, GAD65-GFP embryos exposed to prenatal fluoxetine (PF) and control GAD65-GFP embryos as previously described.26 Time-lapse imaging stacks obtained were piled up using NIS-Elements (Nikon Software, Nikon, Zurich, Switzerland) to obtain orthogonal maximal projections, which were quantified using MetaMorph (Molecular Devices, version 7.7.6, Wokingham, UK). For quantification of cortical invasion, SERT-ko; GAD65-GFP+ INs (n=359 cells; n=4 slices), PF-exposed GAD65-GFP+ INs (n=463 cells; 4=slices) and control GAD65-GFP+ INs (n=437 cells; n=4 slices) were tracked in an 8-h movie. Slices in each experimental condition were obtained from brains of at least two independent dams. Quantification of speed was performed in three subcompartments: intermediate zone (IZ), cortical plate (CP) and marginal zone (MZ), whose boundaries were manually drawn in MetaMorph based on measurements obtained using Hoechst 33258 (1/10 000, Technologies, Zug, Switzerland) staining. The location of GAD65-GFP+ INs at the start of the time-lapse recording was used to assign migrating INs to one of the three subcompartments. Migration speed was calculated as the total distance travelled by GAD65-GFP+ INs divided by total imaging time excluding the pausing time. The percentage of GAD65-GFP+ INs switching between the CP, IZ and MZ was also calculated.

Fluorescence-assisted cell sorting and microarrays

Total RNA was collected as previously described.26 Briefly, E18.5 brains from SERT-ko; GAD65-GFP, PF-exposed GAD65-GFP mice and control GAD65-GFP mice were dissected in cold Hanks' Balanced Salt Solution (Invitrogen, Life Technologies Europe, Basel, Switzerland). Coronal sections (250 μm) were obtained using a Vibratome (Leica VT100S) placed on porous nitrocellulose membranes (Millicell-CM, Millipore) and cortices containing GAD65-GFP+ were dissected under a Leica M165 FC fluorescent scope. Following dissociation with trypsin, GAD65-GFP+ INs from placebo-pelleted SERT-ko; GAD65-GFP, fluoxetine-pelleted GAD65-GFP mice and control placebo-pelleted GAD65-GFP mice were isolated using fluorescence-assisted cell sorting (FACS) on a FACSVantage in RNAlater solution (Invitrogen). RNA was extracted using an RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Hombrechtikon, Switzerland) in triplicate from three different litters of pooled embryos (n=4–5 embryos per FACS) in the three different experimental conditions. For amplification and labelling of total RNA, a small-scale protocol from Affymetrix (High Wycombe, UK) was used as previously described.26 Mouse Genome 430 2.0 Arrays (Affymetrix) were scanned on a GC3000 scanner (Affymetrix), and data were analysed using the Partek Genomics suites (version 6.6 beta). The messenger RNA expression levels of genes (ProbeSet, Affymetrix) were compared using a two-way analysis of variance model with uncorrected P-values set at <0.05 threshold. Selection of target genes was based on >1.5-fold intensity change in fluoxetine-exposed GAD65-GFP+ INs compared with control GAD65-GFP+ INs, and SERT-ko; GAD65-GFP+ INs compared with control GAD65-GFP+ INs. Selected target genes were validated using quantitative polymerase chain reaction as previously described.30 Normalising genes were Actin-B, EEF1, RSP9 and TBP.

Tissue processing

SERT-ko; GAD65-GFP, PF-exposed GAD65-GFP and control GAD65-GFP mice were killed by intraperitoneal injection of pentobarbital (100 mg kg−1) and were intracardially perfused with 0.9% sodium chloride (NaCl)/Liquemin (2 ml l−1), followed by cold 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA)/0.1 m phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) if used for immunohistochemistry (IHC), or 4% PFA/0.1% diethylpyrocarbonate (Sigma, Buchs, Switzerland) if used for in situ hybridisation (ISH), After postfixing ON at 4 °C in respective PFA solutions, 50-μm coronal sections were cut on a Vibratome (Leica VT100S) and kept at 4 °C in either 0.1 m PBS if used for IHC, or 0.1 M PBS with 0.1% diethylpyrocarbonate if used for ISH.

Immunohistochemistry

Antigen retrieval was performed in 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6.0) at 85 °C for 20 min when required. IHC was performed as previously described27 with some changes. Briefly, sections were blocked for 90 min in a blocking buffer (2% Normal Donkey Serum (Gibco, Life Technologies Europe), 0.3% Triton X-100 (Sigma), 0.1% sodium azide (Sigma), 2% bovine serum albumin (Applichem, Baden-Dättwill, Switzerland)) and were incubated with a primary antibody in the blocking buffer for two nights at 4 °C. The primary antibodies used are the following: rat anti-CTIP2 (1:500; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), rabbit anti-CUX1 (1:250; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Heidelberg, Germany), mouse anti-PV (1:1000; Swant), mouse anti-Reelin (1:500; Abcam), mouse anti-SATB2 (1:500; Abcam), rat anti-SST (1:1000; Chemicon, Millipore) and rabbit anti-VIP (1:500; Abcam). After rinsing, slices were incubated for 2 h at room temperature with the corresponding secondary donkey or goat Alexa-488, -568 and -647 antibodies (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen) raised against the appropriate species at a dilution of 1:1000 and were counterstained with Hoechst 33258 (1:10 000, Life Technologies).

In situ hybridisation

RNA probes were synthesised by in vitro transcription. For the SST antisense RNA probe, plasmid template (a kind gift of Paola Arlotta) was linearised with EcoR1 (New England Biolabs, MA, USA). After purification, the DNA template was digoxigenin-labelled (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and polymerised with T3 polymerase (Roche). The NPY antisense RNA probe was synthesised from primers (forward— 5′-CCGGTGGATCTCTTCTCTCA-3′, reverse—5′-CGATGTTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGCAACAACAACAAGGGAAATGG-3′) using the digoxigenin-labelling kit (Roche) and T7 RNA polymerase (Roche). Sections were hybridised as described previously31 with some changes. Briefly, sections mounted on Superfrost Plus Ultra slides (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Reinach, Switzerland) were incubated with 2 μg ml−1 Proteinase K (EuroBio, Les Ulis, France) followed by inactivation with 2 mg ml−1 glycine. Slides were prehybridised in hybridisation buffer (50% deionized formamide, 20% dextran sulphate, 1 mg ml−1 salmon sperm (Invitrogen), 1% 100 × Denhart's, 10% 10 × salt, 0.1% diethylpyrocarbonate (Sigma)) for 1 h at 60 °C and then incubated ON with the appropriate probe (2 μl ml−1) in hybridisation buffer. After washes, slides were blocked with 10% blocking reagent in 1 × Maleic Acid Buffer/Tween (diluted from 5 × MABT (pH 7.5); 500 mM maleic acid, 750 mM sodium chloride (Sigma-Aldrich) and 0.05% Tween-20), followed by incubation with alkaline phosphatase anti-digoxigenin antibody (1: 2000; Roche) ON at 4 °C. Slices were then washed and incubated ON at 4 °C with 4.5 μl ml−1 Nitro blue tetrazolium chloride (Roche) and 3.5 μl ml−1 5-Bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-phosphate (Roche) to reveal the staining.

Quantification of IN laminar positioning

Images were acquired using an epifluorescence microscope (Nikon Eclipse 90i, Nikon) equipped with a × 10 objective (Plan Apo × 10/1, Nikon) or a confocal (Nikon A1R, Nikon) microscope equipped with dry × 10 and × 20 objectives (CFI Plan Apo × 10/0.45 and CFI Plan Apo VC; × 20/0.75, Nikon). Laminar distribution of IN subtypes was quantified on both hemispheres of three coronal sections of brains from SERT-ko, PF-exposed mice and pellet control mice using equally spaced bins apposed at the level of the primary somatosensory cortex. Bins corresponding to cortical layers 1 to 6 were pooled based on cytological differences in the density of Hoechst staining.

Statistical analysis

No statistics were used to determine optimal group sample size and no randomisation or blinding was used. However, sample sizes were similar to those used in previous publications from our group and others. No samples were excluded from statistical analysis, and normal distribution was assumed for statistical tests. Statistical analyses (GraphPad Prism software, version 6.0, La Jolla, CA, USA) were performed using unpaired two-tailed Student's t-test or one-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni's multiple comparisons test.

Results

Early-life SERT deficiency increases the migratory speed of CGE-derived INs

To determine the role of early-life SERT deficiency on CGE-derived IN migration, GAD65-GFP+ transgenic mice were used. GAD65-GFP+ cells preferentially label CGE-derived INs and only rarely MGE-derived INs.26, 27 To assess the impact of early-life SERT deficiency on CGE-derived IN migration in a clinically relevant paradigm, we first used an in vivo pharmacological model of SERT deficiency. Chronic pharmacological blockade of SERT was performed during the late phase of pregnancy by subcutaneously implanting a fluoxetine pellet in E14.5 pregnant dams. Control animals were implanted at E14.5 with a placebo pellet to control for potential confounding effects of brief surgery and anaesthesia. A fluoxetine concentration of 20 mg kg−1 per day was chosen on the basis of a previous study indicating that custom-made pellets lead to clinically relevant concentrations of fluoxetine.29 High-performance liquid chromatography performed on plasma from dams after delivery confirmed that fluoxetine was in the clinical relevant dosage (172.52±19.93 ng ml−1). In brain lysates of P0.5 pups, fluoxetine reached a concentration of 4.25 × 103±561 ng ml−1. To determine whether the migration of GAD65-GFP+ INs was modified by SERT pharmacological inhibition, the dynamic migration of GAD65-GFP+ IN<s was monitored during the phase of cortical invasion in E17.5 cortical slices prepared from fluoxetine-exposed and control mice (Figures 1a and b). Confocal time-lapse movies of 8-h duration were obtained and the migratory dynamics of GAD65-GFP+ INs were analysed in the IZ, the CP and the MZ (Figures 1c–e). Quantification revealed that PF exposure significantly increased the velocity of GAD65-GFP+ INs in the MZ and CP but not in the IZ (Figure 1f). No differences were observed in the percentage of GAD65-GFP+ INs switching between the MZ, CP or IZ in the fluoxetine compared with the control condition (Figures 1g–i).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Prenatal fluoxetine exposure increases the migratory speed of caudal ganglionic eminence (CGE)-derived interneurons (INs). (a) Migration of CGE-derived GAD65-GFP+ INs was monitored using confocal time-lapse imaging on E17.5 cortical slices for 10–12 h. (b) At E17.5, migratory track paths of GAD65-GFP+ INs were analysed in three distinct cortical subcompartments: marginal zone (MZ; red), cortical plate (CP; yellow) and intermediate zone (IZ; blue). (c, d) Time-lapse sequence showing illustrative track paths of GAD65-GFP+ INs in the control (red; c) and fluoxetine (blue; d) condition. Arrows indicate tracked cells. (e) GAD65-GFP+ INs switching between the MZ, CP and IZ compartments are illustrated in the control (red) and fluoxetine (blue) conditions. Circles indicate start position of INs and squares end positions of INs. (f) Prenatal fluoxetine (FLX) significantly increased the mean migratory speed of GAD65-GFP+ INs in the CP and MZ (*P<0.05, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni's test. n=437 cells in CTRL and 463 cells in the FLX condition in at least three independent experiments). (g–i) No significant differences were observed between CTRL and FLX in the fraction of cells switching between the IZ, CP and MZ into the different subcompartments. Error bars are means±s.e.m. Scale bars: (b) 100 μm, (c) 25 μm and (d) 25 μm. SVZ, subventricular zone.

We next determined whether genetic deletion of SERT could affect cortical IN migration. To monitor CGE-derived INs in SERT-ko mice, SERT-ko mice were crossed with GAD65-GFP+ mice and the migratory dynamics of SERT-ko; GAD65-GFP+ INs and control GAD65-GFP+ INs were analysed using time-lapse imaging (Figures 2a–c). Quantification revealed that the migratory speed of SERT-ko; GAD65-GFP+ INs was significantly increased in the MZ, CP and IZ compared with control GAD65-GFP+ INs (Figure 2d). No differences were observed in the percentage of GAD65-GFP+ INs switching between the MZ, CP or IZ in SERT-ko; GAD65-GFP compared with control GAD65-GFP+ INs (Figures 2e–g). Taken together, these results indicate that SERT deficiency due to pharmacological blockade or genetic deletion increases the migratory speed of CGE-derived INs during CP invasion.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Genetic serotonin transporter (SERT) deletion increases the migratory speed of caudal ganglionic eminence (CGE)-derived interneurons (INs). (a, b) Time-lapse sequence showing illustrative track paths of control GAD65-GFP+ INs (red; a) and SERT-ko; GAD65-GFP+ INs (yellow; b) in marginal zone (MZ), cortical plate (CP) and intermediate zone (IZ). Arrows indicate tracked cells. (c) GAD65-GFP+ INs switching between the MZ, CP and IZ compartments are illustrated in the control (red) and SERT-ko (yellow) condition. Circles indicate start position of INs and squares end positions of INs. (d) The mean migratory speed of GAD65-GFP+ INs is significantly increased in the IZ, CP and MZ in the SERT-ko condition compared with control (****P<0.001, **P<0.01, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni's test. n=437 cells in CTRL and 359 cells in SERT-ko condition in at least three independent experiments). (e–g) No significant differences were observed between CTRL and SERT-ko in the fraction of cells switching between the IZ, CP or MZ into the different subcompartments. Error bars are means±s.e.m. Scale bars: (a) 25 μm and (b) 25 μm.

Early-life SERT deficiency affects transcriptional programmes involved in neuronal migration

To identify transcriptional programmes altered by early-life SERT deficiency, fluoxetine-exposed GAD65-GFP+ INs, SERT-ko; GAD65-GFP+ INs and control GAD65-GFP+INs were isolated from cortical slices at E18.5 using FACS (Figure 3a). Total RNA was extracted and microarray-based gene expression analysis was performed. A total of 221 genes in the fluoxetine condition and 58 genes in the SERT-ko condition displayed a greater than 1.5-fold change in expression levels compared with the control condition (Figure 3b and Supplementary Tables 1–5). A small set of 12 genes was found to be commonly dysregulated in fluoxetine and SERT-ko conditions (Figures 3c and d). Validation of nine selected genes among these twelve genes was performed using quantitative polymerase chain reaction, which confirmed the fold changes observed in the microarray data set (Figure 3e and f). Interestingly, among the commonly dysregulated genes were adenomatosis polyposis coli 2 (Apc2),32, 33 slit homolog 2 (Slit2),34, 35, 36 spectrin repeat containing nuclear envelope 2 (Syne2)37 and frizzled homolog 3 (Fzd3),38, 39 which have previously been shown to regulate neuronal migration. In addition, among the top 20 genes dysregulated in the fluoxetine-exposed (Figure 3g) or in the SERT-ko condition (Figure 3h), several genes have been shown to regulate neuronal migration including Scrt2,40 Dpy19l1,41 Adcyap1 (ref. 42) and BicD2 (ref. 43) in the fluoxetine-exposed condition and Otx2,44, 45 Foxp-2,46 Cdkn1B47, 48 and Ntn-1 (ref. 49) in the SERT-ko condition. Taken together, these results indicate that early-life SERT deficiency alters transcriptional programmes involved in the regulation of neuronal migration.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Serotonin transporter (SERT) deficiency alters transcriptional programmes in migrating cortical interneurons (INs). (a) Fluoxetine pellets were implanted at E14.5 in GAD65-GFP mice and placebo pellets in GAD65-GFP mice and SERT-ko; GAD65-GFP+ mice. Microdissection of the developing cortex was performed at E18.5 and GAD65-GFP+ INs were isolated using fluorescence-assisted cell sorting. Total RNA was extracted and microarrays were performed (b) Venn diagram showing that 12 genes are commonly dysregulated in the fluoxetine and SERT-ko condition compared with control. Genes were identified based on P<0.05 (two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)) and 1.5-fold change (FC) threshold. (c, d) Heatmaps showing the 12 commonly dysregulated genes in the control and fluoxetine conditions compared with control. Genes are ranked on the basis of lowest P-value scores, and values represent normalised expression levels (log2) in triplicates. (e, f) Microarrays (MAs) were validated using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) in a selected fraction of commonly dysregulated genes in the fluoxetine (e) and SERT-ko condition (f). Numbers indicate the mean fold change values (log2). (g, h) Heatmaps showing the top 20 genes dysregulated in GAD65-GFP+ INs in fluoxetine (g), and SERT-ko (h) conditions compared with the control. Genes are ranked on the basis of lowest P-value scores and values represent normalised expression levels (log2). Genes dysregulated in both SERT-ko and fluoxetine conditions are in red. Scale bars, (a) 200 μm. SVZ, subventricular zone.

The laminar positioning of CGE- but not MGE-derived IN subtypes are specifically affected by early-life SERT deficiency

To determine whether changes in neuronal migration and gene expression induced by early-life SERT deficiency could give rise to alterations in the positioning of cortical IN subtypes, we quantified the distribution of IN subtypes at P22 in the primary somatosensory cortex of fluoxetine-exposed, SERT-ko and control mice. IHC against standard cortical layer markers including CUX1, SATB2 and CTIP2 revealed no striking differences in the laminar organisation of superficial and deep cortical layers in the somatosensory cortex in fluoxetine-exposed or SERT-ko mice compared with control mice (Supplementary Figure 1a). IHC or ISH was next used to analyse the laminar distribution of MGE-derived and CGE-derived cortical INs using IN-specific subclass markers such as PV (IHC) and SST (ISH) to label MGE-derived INs, and reelin (IHC), NPY (ISH) and VIP (IHC) to label CGE-derived INs. Quantification indicated that the laminar distribution of PV+ (Figure 4a) and SST+ (Figure 4b) MGE-derived INs as well as reelin+/SST− CGE-derived IN subtype (Figure 4c) were not altered in the fluoxetine-exposed compared with the control condition. In contrast, the percentage of NPY+ CGE-derived INs was significantly increased in layer 5 (Figure 4d) in the fluoxetine-exposed compared with the control condition. In addition, the percentage of VIP+ CGE-derived INs was significantly decreased in layers 2/3 (Figures 4e and f) in the fluoxetine-exposed compared with the control condition.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Exposure to prenatal fluoxetine affects the laminar positioning of caudal ganglionic eminence (CGE)-derived but not medial ganglionic eminence (MGE)-derived cortical interneurons (INs). (a–c) At P22, no differences were detected in the laminar positioning of MGE-derived PV+ INs (control (CTRL): n=16 245 cells in six brains; FLX: n=12614 cells in six brains) or SST+ INs (CTRL: n=11 072 cells in six brains; FLX: n=6398 cells in four brains) as well as CGE-derived RELN+/SST− INs (CTRL: n=1421 cells in six brains; FLX: n=1358 cells in six brains) in the fluoxetine (FLX) compared with the CTRL condition. (d) At P22, a significant difference in the laminar positioning of CGE-derived NPY+ INs was observed in layer 5 in the fluoxetine compared with the control condition (CTRL: n=11209 cells in six brains; FLX:n=13 003 cells in six brains; *P<0.05 unpaired Student's t-test). (e) At P22, a significant difference in the laminar positioning of CGE-derived VIP+ INs was observed in layer 2/3 in the fluoxetine compared with the control condition (CTRL: n=516 cells in four brains; FLX; n=820 cells in five brains; **P<0.01 unpaired Student's t-test). Error bars are means±s.e.m. Scale bars, (a–e) 50 μm and (f) 100 μm. NPY, neuropeptide Y; PV, parvalbumin; RELN, reelin; SST, somatostatin; VIP, vasointestinal peptide.

Similarly to fluoxetine-exposed mice, no significant differences in the laminar distribution were observed in PV+ (Figure 5a) and SST+ (Figure 5b) MGE-derived INs as well as reelin+/SST− CGE-derived INs (Figure 5c) of SERT-ko mice compared with controls. However, the percentage of NPY+CGE-derived INs was significantly decreased in layer 1 of SERT-ko mice compared with control mice (Figure 5d). In addition, VIP+ CGE-derived INs were found to be significantly modified in layer 1, layers 2/3 and layer 6 of SERT-ko mice compared with control mice (Figure 5e). Collectively, these data indicate that early-life pharmacological or genetic SERT deficiency specifically alters the laminar positioning of VIP+ and NPY+ CGE-derived IN subtypes, but not MGE-derived INs.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Genetic serotonin transporter (SERT) deletion affects the laminar positioning of caudal ganglionic eminence (CGE)-derived but not medial ganglionic eminence (MGE)-derived cortical interneurons (INs). (a–c) At P22, no differences in the laminar positioning of MGE-derived PV+ INs (control (CTRL): n=8098 cells in six brains; SERT-ko: n=5514 cells in six brains) or SST+ INs (CTRL: n=11072 cells in six brains; SERT-ko: n=10205 cells in five brains) as well as CGE-derived RELN+/SST− INs (CTRL: n=1421 cells in six brains; SERT-ko: n=569 cells in four brains) were detected in the SERT-ko compared with the CTRL condition. (d) At P22, a significant difference in the laminar positioning of CGE-derived NPY+ INs was observed in layer 1 in the SERT-ko compared with the control condition (CTRL: n=11209 cells in six brains; SERT-ko: n=9566 cells in five brains; *P<0.05 unpaired Student's t-test). (e) At P22, a significant difference in the laminar positioning of CGE-derived vasointestinal peptide (VIP)+INs was observed in layers 1, 2/3 and 6 in the SERT-ko compared with the control condition (CTRL: n=516 cells in four brains; SERT-ko: n=879 cells in five brains; *P<0.05, **P<0.01 unpaired Student's t-test). Error bars are means±s.e.m. Scale bars: (a–e) 50 μm and (f) 100 μm. NPY, neuropeptide Y; PV, parvalbumin; RELN, reelin; SST, somatostatin; VIP, vasointestinal peptide.

Discussion

Here we investigated the impact of early-life SERT deficiency on the migration, transcriptional programmes and positioning of cortical IN subtypes. We found that early-life SERT deficiency increased the migratory speed of cortical INs during the late phase of cortical invasion and affected transcriptional programmes involved in the regulation of neuronal migration. At later time points, SERT deficiency led to the laminar mispositioning of specific subsets of CGE-derived INs expressing VIP or NPY, but did not modify the positioning of MGE-derived INs. Interestingly, a common mispositioning alteration of VIP+ INs in layer 2/3 was observed in both models of SERT deficiency. Taken together, these data indicate that early-life SERT deficiency preferentially affects the positioning of specific subclasses of cortical INs that are generated in the CGE and not in the MGE.

Cortical INs are composed of a variety of different cell types that have specific roles in regulating information processing in cortical microcircuits.50 Developmental studies have revealed that the majority of GABAergic cortical INs (~70%) originate from different microdomains located in the MGE and give rise to fast-spiking PV+ basket cells or SST+ INs.51, 52, 53 The remaining fraction of cortical INs (~30%) has been shown to be generated mainly in the CGE54 and to a lesser extent in the preoptic area.55, 56 CGE-derived INs preferentially target superficial cortical layers and constitute a highly diverse cell population. CGE-derived INs in contrast to MGE-derived INs have been shown to express the 5-HT3AR and can be subdivided into reelin+, NPY+ and VIP+ IN subtypes.24, 25, 26 Interestingly, Htr3a mRNA expression in CGE-derived INs increases about fivefold as they invade the CP.26 Functional studies have also demonstrated that the 5-HT3AR is required for the proper migration and positioning of CGE but not MGE-derived cortical INs.26 Here we found that genetic deletion of SERT and prenatal exposure to fluoxetine increase the migratory speed of CGE-derived INs in cortical slices. These pro-migratory effects could be mediated through the 5-HT3AR. Indeed, recent in vitro data indicate that serotonin and 5-HT3AR activation increase calcium transients as well as the migratory speed of CGE-derived INs isolated during the phase of CP invasion.26 Conversely, deletion of the 5-HT3AR decreases the migratory speed of CGE-derived INs in cortical slices.26 Given that pharmacological blockade or genetic deletion of SERT induces an increase in extracellular levels of serotonin,57, 58 we propose that excess of serotonin due to SERT deficiency activates 5-HT3ARs, leading to increases in calcium transients and downstream changes in transcriptional programmes regulating neuronal migration. In addition, serotonin may also have an impact on cortical IN migration by acting through the serotonin receptor 6 (5-HT6R),31 suggesting that this receptor could also contribute to migratory effects induced by SERT deficiency.

IN migration is a multistep process controlled by a variety of molecular mechanisms such as transcription factors, guidance cues and cytoskeletal regulators.52 Using microarrays combined with FACS isolation, we found that genetic and pharmacological SERT deficiency affects transcriptional programmes of migrating CGE-derived INs during the phase of CP invasion. Only a small set of genes was found to be commonly dysregulated in both genetic and pharmacological models of SERT deficiency. Although quantitative polymerase chain reaction confirmed the microarray changes, this was performed on the same complementary DNA library as the microarrays; thus, an independent validation would further strengthen these findings. Interestingly, among dysregulated genes, Apc2 and Slit2 have been shown to functionally interact to regulate neuronal migration. Apc2, distributed along microtubules and actin fibres, is a key regulator of cytoskeletal dynamics and controls the migration of cortical pyramidal neurons.32, 33 SLIT2 is a guidance cue involved in the migration of different types of neurons including subventricular zone progenitors located towards the olfactory bulb,35 cholinergic neurons of the basal magnocellular complex34 and gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons.36 Interestingly, cerebellar granule cells deficient for Apc2 are unresponsive to a gradient of SLIT2,32 suggesting a functional interplay between these two molecules. Although Apc2 and Slit2 do not appear to be involved in the tangential migration of cortical INs,33, 34 our microarray data suggest that a functional interaction between Apc2 and Slit2 could regulate IN migration at later steps, when INs radially invade the CP. Syne2, Fzd3 and Il17rd were also found to be dysregulated in pharmacological and genetic models of SERT deficiency and could also be interesting candidates to consider in the regulation of CGE-derived IN migration. Syne2 controls the coupling between the nucleus and the centrosome during radial migration of cortical pyramidal neurons and is essential for cortical lamination.37 Fzd3 is part of the planar cell polarity pathway and has been shown to regulate the migration of facial branchiomotor neurons.38, 39 Mutations in IL17RD have been associated with Kallmann syndrome,59 a human genetic syndrome characterized by alterations in the migration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone and olfactory neurons.60 Finally, among other dysregulated genes in both pharmacological and genetic SERT deficiency models, several genes were found to regulate migration in non-neuronal cell types such as Hmg-CoA synthase 1 (Hmgcs1) in oligodendrocytes,61 O-linked beta-N-acetylglucosamine (Ogt) in ovarian cancer cells62 and myristoylated alanine-rich C-kinase substrate (Marcks) in various different cell types.63, 64, 65, 66 Apart from the small set of 12 dysregulated genes in both SERT deficiency models, different sets of genes involved in neuronal migration were found to be specifically dysregulated either in fluoxetine-exposed or SERT-ko conditions. This is not surprising, given that fluoxetine was administered during a restricted developmental time period in contrast to constitutive genetic deletion of SERT. In addition, fluoxetine has been reported to induce off-target transcriptional changes in a genome-wide assay performed in yeast.67 SERT-independent effects in biological systems could be because of the fact that fluoxetine directly inhibits several G-coupled protein receptors and ion channels68, 69, 70 including TREK channels.71, 72, 73 Finally, during development selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors such as citalopram have been shown to regulate thalamic axonal growth in a SERT-independent manner.74 These observations thus suggest that some of the fluoxetine-induced transcriptional changes observed in CGE-derived INs could be because of SERT-independent mechanisms. Taken together, our microarray results have led to the identification of transcriptional programmes controlling neuronal migration that are dysregulated in conditions of SERT deficiency. Whether these identified genes are required for the migration of CGE-derived cortical IN remains to be established using cell-type-specific approaches.

Analysis of the laminar positioning of cortical IN subtypes at postnatal time points revealed that early-life SERT deficiency does not affect the laminar distribution of MGE-derived INs, but altered the positioning of specific CGE-derived IN subtypes. In a previous study, we had found that migrating CGE-derived INs are mispositioned at birth in the cortices of SERT-ko mice.31 Using subclass markers for CGE-derived INs, we now report that the laminar distribution of a subpopulation of VIP+/5-HT3AR-expressing INs was altered in superficial cortical layers 2/3 in both models of early-life SERT deficiency. Interestingly, we found no changes in the positioning CGE-derived reelin+ INs in SERT-deficiency models, whereas reelin+ INs were found to be specifically mispositioned in 5-HT3AR-ko mice.26 Our data thus suggest that VIP+ INs represent a novel cellular target of early-life SERT deficiency. In the neocortex, VIP+ INs have recently been shown to inhibit MGE-derived SST+ and PV+ INs75, 76 and to be strongly recruited by reward and punishment reinforcement signals in the auditory cortex.75 It would thus be interesting to determine whether the functional properties of VIP+ INs are affected in SERT-deficiency models and whether CGE-derived IN dysfunction induced by SERT deficiency has a causal role in the psychiatric-relevant phenotypes induced by SERT deficiency. Finally, it should be noted that, in order to isolate GAD65-GFP+ INs from homozygote SERT-ko embryos for the microarray study, it was necessary to mate homozygote SERT-ko; GAD65-GFP+ females to homozygote SERT-ko; GAD65-GFP+ males. Given this strategy, littermate controls were not used in this study. This is a limitation, given that SERT homozygotes and heterozygotes are known to display stress-related behavioural abnormalities that could have an impact on embryonic development.12

In conclusion, our study reveals that early-life SERT deficiency affects the migratory dynamics, transcriptional programmes and laminar positioning of a specific subset of cortical INs. The sequential developmental steps that link increased migratory dynamics to the mispositioning of INs in the postnatal cortex remain to be fully understood. In the present model, we propose that early-life SERT deficiency by increasing serotonin extracellular levels will stimulate calcium activity in migrating INs. This will trigger complex transcriptional alterations in a network of migratory and epigenetic pathways, which will ultimately lead to the mispositioning of INs. Interestingly, increased calcium activity during migration has recently been shown to induce mispositioning defects possibly because of the premature differentiation of migrating cortical neurons.77 Our data obtained in rodents have potential clinical relevance as antidepressants such as fluoxetine cross the human placenta78 to modify fetal physiology79, 80 and affect neonatal adaptation,81, 82, 83, 84, 85 delay head growth,86 may accelerate the closure of critical time periods in speech perception87 and increase anxious behaviours in children.88 Although the long-term psychiatric-related effects of exposure to antidepressants during pregnancy are difficult to quantify in human cohorts, emerging data suggest that prenatal exposure to antidepressants may increases the risk for autism spectrum disorder22, 23 and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.21 However, it should be noted that these findings need to be further replicated, given the potential confounding effects of maternal depression severity.89 Although it is currently very difficult to precisely determine the impact of prenatal selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor exposure on human brain development at a cellular level, our data reveal that, in rodents, early-life SERT deficiency affects specific cellular events involved in cortical circuit formation, which adds to the growing body of evidence that serotonin-related pathways are important regulators of developmental plasticity in health and disease.8, 9

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank C Aubry for technical assistance, P Lescuyer for high-performance liquid chromatography, Julien Prados for help on the microarray data, the Geneva Genomics Platform and the Geneva Bioimaging Platform. This work was supported by Swiss National Foundation (SNF) grants (PP00P3_128379 and 31003A_155896 /1), the NCCR Synapsy grant (AGD) and the Brain & Behavior Research Foundation.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on the Translational Psychiatry website (http://www.nature.com/tp)

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Figure 1
Click here for additional data file. (828KB, pdf)
Supplementary Material
Click here for additional data file. (455.5KB, doc)
Supplementary Movie 1
Click here for additional data file. (12.8MB, mov)
Supplementary Movie 2
Click here for additional data file. (3.5MB, mov)
Supplementary Movie 3
Click here for additional data file. (4.6MB, mov)
Supplementary Movie 4
Click here for additional data file. (3.6MB, mov)

References

  1. Huang ZJ. Toward a genetic dissection of cortical circuits in the mouse. Neuron 2014; 83: 1284–1302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Marin O, Valiente M, Ge X, Tsai LH. Guiding neuronal cell migrations. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2010; 2: a001834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Valiente M, Marin O. Neuronal migration mechanisms in development and disease. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2010; 20: 68–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Todtenkopf MS, Vincent SL, Benes FM. A cross-study meta-analysis and three-dimensional comparison of cell counting in the anterior cingulate cortex of schizophrenic and bipolar brain. Schizophr Res 2005; 73: 79–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lewis DA, Hashimoto T, Volk DW. Cortical inhibitory neurons and schizophrenia. Nat Rev Neurosci 2005; 6: 312–324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Marin O. Interneuron dysfunction in psychiatric disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci 2012; 13: 107–120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gaspar P, Cases O, Maroteaux L. The developmental role of serotonin: news from mouse molecular genetics. Nat Rev Neurosci 2003; 4: 1002–1012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Vitalis T, Ansorge MS, Dayer AG. Serotonin homeostasis and serotonin receptors as actors of cortical construction: special attention to the 5-HT3A and 5-HT6 receptor subtypes. Front Cell Neurosci 2013; 7: 93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dayer A. Serotonin-related pathways and developmental plasticity: relevance for psychiatric disorders. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2014; 16: 29–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bonnin A, Goeden N, Chen K, Wilson ML, King J, Shih JC et al. A transient placental source of serotonin for the fetal forebrain. Nature 2011; 472: 347–350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Homberg JR, Schubert D, Gaspar P. New perspectives on the neurodevelopmental effects of SSRIs. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2010; 31: 60–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kalueff AV, Olivier JD, Nonkes LJ, Homberg JR. Conserved role for the serotonin transporter gene in rat and mouse neurobehavioral endophenotypes. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2009; 34: 373–386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Oberlander TF, Gingrich JA, Ansorge MS. Sustained neurobehavioral effects of exposure to SSRI antidepressants during development: molecular to clinical evidence. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2009; 86: 672–677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Murphy DL, Lesch KP. Targeting the murine serotonin transporter: insights into human neurobiology. Nat Rev Neurosci 2008; 9: 85–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Karg K, Burmeister M, Shedden K, Sen S. The serotonin transporter promoter variant (5-HTTLPR), stress, and depression meta-analysis revisited: evidence of genetic moderation. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011; 68: 444–454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Bennett AJ, Lesch KP, Heils A, Long JC, Lorenz JG, Shoaf SE et al. Early experience and serotonin transporter gene variation interact to influence primate CNS function. Mol Psychiatry 2002; 7: 118–122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pluess M, Velders FP, Belsky J, van IJMH, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, Jaddoe VW et al. Serotonin transporter polymorphism moderates effects of prenatal maternal anxiety on infant negative emotionality. Biol Psychiatry 2011; 69: 520–525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Champoux M, Bennett A, Shannon C, Higley JD, Lesch KP, Suomi SJ. Serotonin transporter gene polymorphism, differential early rearing, and behavior in rhesus monkey neonates. Mol Psychiatry 2002; 7: 1058–1063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pezawas L, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Drabant EM, Verchinski BA, Munoz KE, Kolachana BS et al. 5-HTTLPR polymorphism impacts human cingulate-amygdala interactions: a genetic susceptibility mechanism for depression. Nat Neurosci 2005; 8: 828–834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Munafo MR, Brown SM, Hariri AR. Serotonin transporter (5-HTTLPR) genotype and amygdala activation: a meta-analysis. Biol Psychiatry 2008; 63: 852–857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Clements CC, Castro VM, Blumenthal SR, Rosenfield HR, Murphy SN, Fava M et al. Prenatal antidepressant exposure is associated with risk for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder but not autism spectrum disorder in a large health system. Mol Psychiatry 2014; 20: 727–734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rai D, Lee BK, Dalman C, Golding J, Lewis G, Magnusson C. Parental depression, maternal antidepressant use during pregnancy, and risk of autism spectrum disorders: population based case-control study. Br Med J 2013; 346: f2059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Croen LA, Grether JK, Yoshida CK, Odouli R, Hendrick V. Antidepressant use during pregnancy and childhood autism spectrum disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011; 68: 1104–1112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Vucurovic K, Gallopin T, Ferezou I, Rancillac A, Chameau P, van Hooft JA et al. Serotonin 3A receptor subtype as an early and protracted marker of cortical interneuron subpopulations. Cereb Cortex 2010; 20: 2333–2347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lee S, Hjerling-Leffler J, Zagha E, Fishell G, Rudy B. The largest group of superficial neocortical GABAergic interneurons expresses ionotropic serotonin receptors. J Neurosci 2010; 30: 16796–16808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Murthy S, Niquille M, Hurni N, Limoni G, Frazer S, Chameau P et al. Serotonin receptor 3A controls interneuron migration into the neocortex. Nat Commun 2014; 5: 5524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Riccio O, Murthy S, Szabo G, Vutskits L, Kiss JZ, Vitalis T et al. New pool of cortical interneuron precursors in the early postnatal dorsal white matter. Cereb Cortex 2012; 22: 86–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lira A, Zhou M, Castanon N, Ansorge MS, Gordon JA, Francis JH et al. Altered depression-related behaviors and functional changes in the dorsal raphe nucleus of serotonin transporter-deficient mice. Biol Psychiatry 2003; 54: 960–971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Covington HEr, Maze I, LaPlant QC, Vialou VF, Ohnishi YN, Berton O et al. Antidepressant actions of histone deacetylase inhibitors. J Neurosci 2009; 29: 11451–11460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Riccio O, Jacobshagen M, Golding B, Vutskits L, Jabaudon D, Hornung JP et al. Excess of serotonin affects neocortical pyramidal neuron migration. Transl Psychiatry 2011; 1: e47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Riccio O, Potter G, Walzer C, Vallet P, Szabo G, Vutskits L et al. Excess of serotonin affects embryonic interneuron migration through activation of the serotonin receptor 6. Mol Psychiatry 2009; 14: 280–290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Shintani T, Takeuchi Y, Fujikawa A, Noda M. Directional neuronal migration is impaired in mice lacking adenomatous polyposis coli 2. J Neurosci 2012; 32: 6468–6484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Eom TY, Stanco A, Guo J, Wilkins G, Deslauriers D, Yan J et al. Differential regulation of microtubule severing by APC underlies distinct patterns of projection neuron and interneuron migration. Dev Cell 2014; 31: 677–689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Marin O, Plump AS, Flames N, Sanchez-Camacho C, Tessier-Lavigne M, Rubenstein JL. Directional guidance of interneuron migration to the cerebral cortex relies on subcortical Slit1/2-independent repulsion and cortical attraction. Development 2003; 130: 1889–1901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Wu W, Wong K, Chen J, Jiang Z, Dupuis S, Wu JY et al. Directional guidance of neuronal migration in the olfactory system by the protein Slit. Nature 1999; 400: 331–336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Cariboni A, Andrews WD, Memi F, Ypsilanti AR, Zelina P, Chedotal A et al. Slit2 and Robo3 modulate the migration of GnRH-secreting neurons. Development 2012; 139: 3326–3331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhang X, Lei K, Yuan X, Wu X, Zhuang Y, Xu T et al. SUN1/2 and Syne/Nesprin-1/2 complexes connect centrosome to the nucleus during neurogenesis and neuronal migration in mice. Neuron 2009; 64: 173–187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Qu Y, Glasco DM, Zhou L, Sawant A, Ravni A, Fritzsch B et al. Atypical cadherins Celsr1-3 differentially regulate migration of facial branchiomotor neurons in mice. J Neurosci 2010; 30: 9392–9401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Vivancos V, Chen P, Spassky N, Qian D, Dabdoub A, Kelley M et al. Wnt activity guides facial branchiomotor neuron migration, and involves the PCP pathway and JNK and ROCK kinases. Neural Dev 2009; 4: 7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Paul V, Tonchev AB, Henningfeld KA, Pavlakis E, Rust B, Pieler T et al. Scratch2 modulates neurogenesis and cell migration through antagonism of bHLH proteins in the developing neocortex. Cereb Cortex 2014; 24: 754–772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Watanabe K, Takebayashi H, Bepari AK, Esumi S, Yanagawa Y, Tamamaki N. Dpy19l1, a multi-transmembrane protein, regulates the radial migration of glutamatergic neurons in the developing cerebral cortex. Development 2011; 138: 4979–4990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Toriyama M, Mizuno N, Fukami T, Iguchi T, Toriyama M, Tago K et al. Phosphorylation of doublecortin by protein kinase A orchestrates microtubule and actin dynamics to promote neuronal progenitor cell migration. J Biol Chem 2012; 287: 12691–12702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Jaarsma D, van den Berg R, Wulf PS, van Erp S, Keijzer N, Schlager MA et al. A role for Bicaudal-D2 in radial cerebellar granule cell migration. Nat Commun 2014; 5: 3411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Golding B, Pouchelon G, Bellone C, Murthy S, Di Nardo AA, Govindan S et al. Retinal input directs the recruitment of inhibitory interneurons into thalamic visual circuits. Neuron 2014; 81: 1057–1069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Wortham M, Jin G, Sun JL, Bigner DD, He Y, Yan H. Aberrant Otx2 expression enhances migration and induces ectopic proliferation of hindbrain neuronal progenitor cells. PLoS One 2012; 7: e36211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Clovis YM, Enard W, Marinaro F, Huttner WB, De Pietri Tonelli D. Convergent repression of Foxp2 3'UTR by miR-9 and miR-132 in embryonic mouse neocortex: implications for radial migration of neurons. Development 2012; 139: 3332–3342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Godin JD, Thomas N, Laguesse S, Malinouskaya L, Close P, Malaise O et al. p27(Kip1) is a microtubule-associated protein that promotes microtubule polymerization during neuron migration. Dev Cell 2012; 23: 729–744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Nishimura YV, Shikanai M, Hoshino M, Ohshima T, Nabeshima Y, Mizutani K et al. Cdk5 and its substrates, Dcx and p27kip1, regulate cytoplasmic dilation formation and nuclear elongation in migrating neurons. Development 2014; 141: 3540–3550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Stanco A, Szekeres C, Patel N, Rao S, Campbell K, Kreidberg JA et al. Netrin-1-alpha3beta1 integrin interactions regulate the migration of interneurons through the cortical marginal zone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106: 7595–7600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Fishell G, Rudy B. Mechanisms of Inhibition within the Telencephalon: “Where the Wild Things Are”. Annu Rev Neurosci 2011; 34: 535–567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Flames N, Pla R, Gelman DM, Rubenstein JL, Puelles L, Marin O. Delineation of multiple subpallial progenitor domains by the combinatorial expression of transcriptional codes. J Neurosci 2007; 27: 9682–9695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Marin O. Cellular and molecular mechanisms controlling the migration of neocortical interneurons. Eur J Neurosci 2013; 38: 2019–2029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Gelman DM, Marin O. Generation of interneuron diversity in the mouse cerebral cortex. Eur J Neurosci 2010; 31: 2136–2141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Miyoshi G, Hjerling-Leffler J, Karayannis T, Sousa VH, Butt SJ, Battiste J et al. Genetic fate mapping reveals that the caudal ganglionic eminence produces a large and diverse population of superficial cortical interneurons. J Neurosci 2010; 30: 1582–1594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Gelman DM, Martini FJ, Nobrega-Pereira S, Pierani A, Kessaris N, Marin O. The embryonic preoptic area is a novel source of cortical GABAergic interneurons. J Neurosci 2009; 29: 9380–9389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Gelman D, Griveau A, Dehorter N, Teissier A, Varela C, Pla R et al. A wide diversity of cortical GABAergic interneurons derives from the embryonic preoptic area. J Neurosci 2011; 31: 16570–16580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Mathews TA, Fedele DE, Coppelli FM, Avila AM, Murphy DL, Andrews AM. Gene dose-dependent alterations in extraneuronal serotonin but not dopamine in mice with reduced serotonin transporter expression. J Neurosci Methods 2004; 140: 169–181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Koch S, Perry KW, Nelson DL, Conway RG, Threlkeld PG, Bymaster FP. R-fluoxetine increases extracellular DA, NE, as well as 5-HT in rat prefrontal cortex and hypothalamus: an in vivo microdialysis and receptor binding study. Neuropsychopharmacology 2002; 27: 949–959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Miraoui H, Dwyer AA, Sykiotis GP, Plummer L, Chung W, Feng B et al. Mutations in FGF17, IL17RD, DUSP6, SPRY4, and FLRT3 are identified in individuals with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Am J Hum Genet 2013; 92: 725–743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Valdes-Socin H, Rubio Almanza M, Tome Fernandez-Ladreda M, Debray FG, Bours V, Beckers A. Reproduction, smell, and neurodevelopmental disorders: genetic defects in different hypogonadotropic hypogonadal syndromes. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2014; 5: 109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Mathews ES, Mawdsley DJ, Walker M, Hines JH, Pozzoli M, Appel B. Mutation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA synthase I reveals requirements for isoprenoid and cholesterol synthesis in oligodendrocyte migration arrest, axon wrapping, and myelin gene expression. J Neurosci 2014; 34: 3402–3412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Jin FZ, Yu C, Zhao DZ, Wu MJ, Yang Z. A correlation between altered O-GlcNAcylation, migration and with changes in E-cadherin levels in ovarian cancer cells. Exp Cell Res 2013; 319: 1482–1490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Ott LE, Sung EJ, Melvin AT, Sheats MK, Haugh JM, Adler KB et al. Fibroblast migration is regulated by myristoylated alanine-rich C-kinase substrate (MARCKS) protein. PLoS One 2013; 8: e66512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Sheats MK, Sung EJ, Adler KB, Jones SL. In vitro neutrophil migration requires protein kinase C-Delta (delta-PKC)-mediated myristoylated alanine-rich C-kinase substrate (MARCKS) phosphorylation. Inflammation 2014; 38: 1126–1141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Kalwa H, Michel T. The MARCKS protein plays a critical role in phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate metabolism and directed cell movement in vascular endothelial cells. J Biol Chem 2011; 286: 2320–2330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Lee S, Jang E, Kim JH, Kim JH, Lee WH, Suk K. Lipocalin-type prostaglandin D2 synthase protein regulates glial cell migration and morphology through myristoylated alanine-rich C-kinase substrate: prostaglandin D2-independent effects. J Biol Chem 2012; 287: 9414–9428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Ericson E, Gebbia M, Heisler LE, Wildenhain J, Tyers M, Giaever G et al. Off-target effects of psychoactive drugs revealed by genome-wide assays in yeast. PLoS Genet 2008; 4: e1000151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Ni YG, Miledi R. Blockage of 5HT2C serotonin receptors by fluoxetine (Prozac). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94: 2036–2040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Garcia-Colunga J, Awad JN, Miledi R. Blockage of muscle and neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors by fluoxetine (Prozac). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94: 2041–2044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Kobayashi T, Washiyama K, Ikeda K. Inhibition of G protein-activated inwardly rectifying K+ channels by fluoxetine (Prozac). Br J Pharmacol 2003; 138: 1119–1128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Kennard LE, Chumbley JR, Ranatunga KM, Armstrong SJ, Veale EL, Mathie A. Inhibition of the human two-pore domain potassium channel, TREK-1, by fluoxetine and its metabolite norfluoxetine. Br J Pharmacol 2005; 144: 821–829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Heurteaux C, Lucas G, Guy N, El Yacoubi M, Thummler S, Peng XD et al. Deletion of the background potassium channel TREK-1 results in a depression-resistant phenotype. Nat Neurosci 2006; 9: 1134–1141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Dong YY, Pike AC, Mackenzie A, McClenaghan C, Aryal P, Dong L et al. K2P channel gating mechanisms revealed by structures of TREK-2 and a complex with Prozac. Science 2015; 347: 1256–1259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Bonnin A, Zhang L, Blakely RD, Levitt P. The SSRI citalopram affects fetal thalamic axon responsiveness to netrin-1 in vitro independently of SERT antagonism. Neuropsychopharmacology 2012; 37: 1879–1884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Pi HJ, Hangya B, Kvitsiani D, Sanders JI, Huang ZJ, Kepecs A. Cortical interneurons that specialize in disinhibitory control. Nature 2013; 503: 521–524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Lee S, Kruglikov I, Huang ZJ, Fishell G, Rudy B. A disinhibitory circuit mediates motor integration in the somatosensory cortex. Nat Neurosci 2013; 16: 1662–1670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Bando Y, Irie K, Shimomura T, Umeshima H, Kushida Y, Kengaku M et al. Control of spontaneous Ca2+ transients is critical for neuronal maturation in the developing neocortex. Cereb Cortex; advance online publication, 11 August 2014; doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu180. [DOI] [PubMed]
  78. Rampono J, Proud S, Hackett LP, Kristensen JH, Ilett KF. A pilot study of newer antidepressant concentrations in cord and maternal serum and possible effects in the neonate. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2004; 7: 329–334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Mulder EJ, Ververs FF, de Heus R, Visser GH. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors affect neurobehavioral development in the human fetus. Neuropsychopharmacology 2011; 36: 1961–1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Rurak D, Lim K, Sanders A, Brain U, Riggs W, Oberlander TF. Third trimester fetal heart rate and doppler middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity characteristics during prenatal selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) exposure. Pediatr Res 2011; 70: 96–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Laine K, Heikkinen T, Ekblad U, Kero P. Effects of exposure to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors during pregnancy on serotonergic symptoms in newborns and cord blood monoamine and prolactin concentrations. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2003; 60: 720–726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Colvin L, Slack-Smith L, Stanley FJ, Bower C. Early morbidity and mortality following in utero exposure to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: a population-based study in Western Australia. CNS Drugs 2012; 26: e1–e14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Casper RC, Fleisher BE, Lee-Ancajas JC, Gilles A, Gaylor E, DeBattista A et al. Follow-up of children of depressed mothers exposed or not exposed to antidepressant drugs during pregnancy. J Pediatr 2003; 142: 402–408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Oberlander TF, Warburton W, Misri S, Aghajanian J, Hertzman C. Effects of timing and duration of gestational exposure to serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants: population-based study. Br J Psychiatry 2008; 192: 338–343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Casper RC, Gilles AA, Fleisher BE, Baran J, Enns G, Lazzeroni LC. Length of prenatal exposure to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants: effects on neonatal adaptation and psychomotor development. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2011; 217: 211–219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. El Marroun H, Jaddoe VW, Hudziak JJ, Roza SJ, Steegers EA, Hofman A et al. Maternal use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, fetal growth, and risk of adverse birth outcomes. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2012; 69: 706–714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Weikum WM, Oberlander TF, Hensch TK, Werker JF. Prenatal exposure to antidepressants and depressed maternal mood alter trajectory of infant speech perception. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109: 17221–17227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Hanley GE, Brain U, Oberlander TF. Prenatal exposure to serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants and childhood behavior. Pediatr Res 2015; 78: 174–180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Weisskopf E, Fischer CJ, Bickle Graz M, Morisod Harari M, Tolsa JF, Claris O et al. Risk-benefit balance assessment of SSRI antidepressant use during pregnancy and lactation based on best available evidence. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2015; 1–15. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figure 1
Click here for additional data file. (828KB, pdf)
Supplementary Material
Click here for additional data file. (455.5KB, doc)
Supplementary Movie 1
Click here for additional data file. (12.8MB, mov)
Supplementary Movie 2
Click here for additional data file. (3.5MB, mov)
Supplementary Movie 3
Click here for additional data file. (4.6MB, mov)
Supplementary Movie 4
Click here for additional data file. (3.6MB, mov)

Articles from Translational Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES