Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Radiology. 2016 May 12;281(2):574–582. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016152247

Table 1.

Patient Characteristics before and 2 and 12 Weeks after TIPS Placement

Characteristic Patient 1 Patient 2 Patient 3 Patient 4 Patient 5 Patient 6 Patient 7
Age (y) 63 34 59 54 46 54 54
Sex Male Male Male Female Male Male Male
Disease Alcoholic cirrhosis Nodular regenerative hyperplasia Alcoholic cirrhosis, hepatitis C Alcoholic cirrhosis, hepatitis C Idiopathic cirrhosis Cirrhosis, NASH Cirrhosis, NASH
TIPS Indication Refractory ascites Refractory ascites Refractory ascites Refractory ascites Refractory ascites Refractory ascites Refractory ascites
TIPS device 10 mm × 8 cm 10 mm × 8 cm 10 mm × 8 cm 10 mm × 8 cm 10 mm × 8 cm 10 mm × 7 cm 10 mm × 8 cm
Before TIPS
    Child-Pugh score 9 7 8 9 6 7 7
    MELD score 15 9 14 8 13 15 7
    Ascites grade Large Large Large Large Large Large Large
    HE present No No No No No No No
Pressure gradient* (mm Hg) 18 (7) 14 (9) 20 (10) 14 (6) 28 (18) 12 (4) 8 (3)
2 weeks after TIPS
    Child-Pugh score 12 9 7 8 6 7 6
    MELD score 16 9 12 8 13 15 10
    Ascites grade Large Moderate Moderate Mild Large Moderate Mild
    HE present No No Severe No No Severe No
12 weeks after TIPS
    Child-Pugh score 9 8 8 7 7 10 6
    MELD score 16 12 12 10 12 20 7
    Ascites grade Moderate Mild Mild Mild Large Mild Mild
    HE present No No Mild No No Mild No

Note.—Patient 5 had persistent post TIPS high portosystemic pressure gradient and refractory ascites. All TIPS were Viatorr stent grafts. HE = hepatic encephalopathy, MELD = Model for End-Stage Liver Disease, NASH = nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

*

Data are before TIPS placement, and data in parentheses are after TIPS placement.