Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Radiology. 2016 May 12;281(2):574–582. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016152247

Table 2.

Comparison of Peak Velocities and Flow Volumes before and 2 and 12 Weeks after TIPS Placement

Time Point SMV SV PV TIPS
Peak Velocity (m/sec)
Pre 0.35 ± 0.12 0.39 ± 0.14 0.40 ± 0.16 ...
Post 1 0.55 ± 0.15 0.56 ± 0.12 0.60 ± 0.18 1.21 ± 0.21
Post 2 0.55 ± 0.12 0.63 ± 0.18 0.60 ± 0.16 1.26 ± 0.16
Post 1 to pre* 0.20 (−0.03, 0.42) 0.17 (−0.02, 0.36) 0.20 (0.05, 0.35) ...
    P value .089 .081 .015 ...
Post 2 to pre* 0.20 (−0.01, 0.41) 0.24 (0.01, 0.48) 0.20 (−0.04, 0.43) ...
    P value .064 .046 .102 ...
Post 2 to post 1* 0.01 (−0.09, 0.10) 0.07 (−0.04, 0.19) −0.01 (−0.13, 0.12) 0.05 (−0.02-0.11)
    P value 1.00 .211 1.00 .136

Flow Volume (L/min)
Pre 0.36 ± 0.29 0.33 ± 0.23 0.76 ± 0.62 ...
Post 1 0.60 ± 0.36 0.64 ± 0.36 1.64 ± 0.98 1.58 ± 0.63
Post 2 0.82 ± 0.57 0.81 ± 0.53 1.73 ± 0.92 1.73 ± 0.53
Post 1 to pre* 0.24 (0.07, 0.41) 0.31 (0.07, 0.54) 0.88 (0.06-1.70)
    P value .011 .015 .037 ...
Post 2 to pre* 0.46 (0.01, 0.90) 0.48 (0.04, 0.92) 0.97 (0.42-1.52) ...
    P value .046 .034 .003 ...
Post 2 to post 1* 0.21 (−0.15, 0.59) 0.17 (−0.22, 0.56) 0.09 (−0.55-0.74) 0.14 (−0.22, 0.50)
    P value .327 .565 1.00 .375

Note.—Unless otherwise indicated, data are mean plus or minus standard deviation. Reported P values are adjusted for three independent t tests. P < .05 indicates a significant difference. Pre = before TIPS placement, Post 1 = 2 weeks after TIPS placement, Post 2 = 12 weeks after TIPS placement.

*

Data are mean differences, and data in parentheses are 95% CIs.

P < .05.