Skip to main content
Clinical Pediatric Endocrinology logoLink to Clinical Pediatric Endocrinology
. 2016 Oct 18;25(4):119–126. doi: 10.1297/cpe.25.119

Longitudinal observation of serum anti-Müllerian hormone in three girls after cancer treatment

Yoko Miyoshi 1, Kie Yasuda 1, Makiko Tachibana 1, Hisao Yoshida 1, Emiko Miyashita 1, Takako Miyamura 1, Yoshiko Hashii 1, Kae Hashimoto 2, Tadashi Kimura 2, Keiichi Ozono 1
PMCID: PMC5069540  PMID: 27780981

Abstract.

Gonadal dysfunction and infertility are major endocrinological late effects among childhood cancer survivors. Chemotherapy and radiation have gonadotoxic effects and diminish the ovarian reserve. The serum concentration of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) is a useful marker of ovarian reserve in survivors. We conducted a longitudinal study to investigate the variations of AMH in evaluating the acute and chronic effects of cancer therapy on the ovary. Three young female patients with different hematological diseases were registered, and their medical records were reviewed. Patient 1 with myelodysplastic syndrome received reduced-intensity hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) at 10 yr of age. Breast development and menarche occurred spontaneously after HSCT; however, AMH level became undetectable and gonadotropin did not increase. Patient 2 with acute lymphoblastic leukemia had been receiving chemotherapy since 11 yr of age. AMH level became undetectable but increased after chemotherapy and was associated with regular menstruation. Patient 3 with acute myeloid leukemia received chemotherapy at 13 yr of age and myeloablative HSCT at 14 yr of age. AMH level became undetectable after HSCT, and the patient developed amenorrhea. These different patterns in the recovery phase demonstrated that the AMH level immediately after the end of cancer therapy is inappropriate for the evaluation of the ovarian reserve.

Keywords: anti-Müllerian hormone, childhood cancer survivor, gonadal function, fertility, ovarian reserve

Introduction

With the improvement of cure rates in cancer patients, the number of childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) is surmised to be growing rapidly (1). However, this improved survival has been accompanied by the occurrence of treatment-related late complications (late effects) (2,3,4). Infertility and impaired reproductive capacity after cancer therapy have become important issues pertaining to the quality of life of patients (5,6,7). Our group previously reported the endocrinological abnormalities and gonadal dysfunction among CCSs at a single hospital (8). In collaboration with members of the CCS Committee of the Japanese Society for Pediatric Endocrinology (JSPE), we conducted a questionnaire survey concerning reproductive function in pediatric cancer patients (9). Chemotherapy and radiation therapy are gonadotoxic and can lead to premature ovarian failure and infertility in female patients (10, 11). The long-term follow-up guidelines of the Children’s Oncology Group have recommended periodic screening of gonadotropins and sex steroids among cancer survivors (12). The JSPE has also issued a follow-up guide for CCSs (13). However, markers such as regular menstrual cycle, basal FSH values, and pregnancy have limitations with respect to utility. It is difficult to predict gonadal function and reproductive capacity during early childhood, as the serum concentrations of gonadotropins and sex steroids are not informative. Although the recovery of ovarian function (i.e., regular menstruation) may occur after cancer therapy, the ovarian primordial follicle pool may not recover. In this regard, the serum concentration of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) might be helpful for testing and interpreting measures of ovarian reserve (14). AMH is secreted by ovarian granulosa cells and does not change significantly during the menstrual cycle (15). AMH levels are reduced after chemotherapy and radiotherapy; therefore, AMH level is currently considered a useful indicator of the long-term impact of cancer therapy on the reproductive capacity of female CCSs (16,17,18). We have also reported that AMH concentration is a useful marker of ovarian reserve in CCSs for detecting primary gonadal deficiency, particularly among patients without increased gonadotropin levels (19). While the utility of serum AMH is gradually being recognized in Japan, the most appropriate time to measure this marker in pediatric CCSs has not been established.

The aim of this study was to investigate the variations of serum AMH levels longitudinally in determining the acute and chronic effects of cancer therapy on the ovarian reserve, and to establish the appropriate time to measure this marker in Japanese pediatric CCSs.

Subjects and Methods

The ethical committee of Osaka University Hospital approved this study (approval No. 10224). This study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent for evaluation was obtained from the parents of the patients. The medical records of three girls who had received cancer treatment for hematological disease were reviewed prospectively. They had been treated and were followed regularly in the Pediatric Department of Osaka University Hospital. The patients were questioned about age at breast development and details of menstruation. We did not perform transvaginal ultrasonography for measurement of ovarian antral follicle count because of the young age of the patients or refusal of the parents to consent.

We measured the basal plasma concentrations of FSH. FSH was measured by using a chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (Access FSH; Beckman Coulter, Tokyo, Japan) with a sensitivity of 0.2 mIU/mL. The reference values of FSH for female patients at our institute are as follows: 4.5–11.0 mIU/mL during the follicular phase, 3.6–20.6 mIU/mL during the ovulatory phase, 1.5–10.8 mIU/mL during the luteal phase, 2.0–21.9 mIU/mL during perimenopause, and 21.5–159.0 mIU/mL during menopause. In this study, high FSH was defined as > 10 mIU/mL before menarche and > 20 mIU/mL for female patients receiving estrogen replacement therapy. Aliquots of serum were frozen at –20°C and subsequently used to measure concomitant AMH concentrations. AMH levels were measured by using highly sensitive ELISA (AMH Gen II, Beckman Coulter Company) from SRL Inc. (Tokyo, Japan). The concentrations were compared to the normal values in healthy pediatric female patients as reported by Hagen et al., with a cutoff value < 2.5th percentile being defined as low AMH (20). The conversion formula offered by SRL Inc. was as follows: AMH Gen II (ng/mL) = 0.189 × EIA AMH (pmol/L) – 0.334.

Results

The underlying diseases and treatment regimens for chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) were obtained from medical records and are summarized in Table 1. The treatment regimens were chemotherapy in three, radiotherapy in one, and HSCT in two girls. We surveyed the development of puberty and menstrual cycles. The onset of puberty i.e., breast development and menarche had occurred spontaneously before cancer therapy in two patients and after therapy in one patient. We examined the relationship between AMH and FSH levels in these patients.

Table 1. Underlying diseases, treatment regimens, and development of puberty in the three patients.

graphic file with name cpe-25-119-t001.jpg

Patient 1 was a girl with myelodysplastic syndrome. She received reduced-intensity HSCT at 10 yr of age. Fludarabine (150 mg/m2) and melphalan (180 mg/m2) were used for conditioning for HSCT (Table 1). Breast development and menarche occurred spontaneously, and gonadotropin did not increase after HSCT; however, serum AMH levels became undetectable: 1.48 ng/mL pre-HSCT versus < 0.10, 0.9, 0.34, and < 0.1 ng/mL at 1–9, 12, 15, and 18–36 mo post-HSCT, respectively (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels became undetectable but recovered transiently after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patient 1.

Patient 2 was a girl with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. She had been receiving chemotherapy from 11 yr of age (Table 1). The AMH level became undetectable but increased after chemotherapy: 1.85 ng/mL pretreatment versus < 0.10, 1.46, 0.6, 1.24, and 1.55 ng/mL at 0, 3, 6–18, 24, and 30 mo posttreatment, respectively (Fig. 2). The FSH level increased during cancer therapy but normalized after treatment. Menstruation continued regularly.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels became undetectable but recovered after chemotherapy in patient 2.

Patient 3 was a girl with acute myeloid leukemia. She began receiving chemotherapy at 13 yr of age and myeloablative HSCT at 14 yr of age (Table 1). She received a multiagent chemotherapy regimen, and was given melphalan (180 mg/m2) and 12 Gy total body irradiation (including both ovaries) for conditioning for HSCT. The FSH levels increased abnormally. AMH level became undetectable and showed no recovery after HSCT: 1.41 ng/mL pre-HSCT versus 0.88 ng/mL during therapy and < 0.10 ng/mL at 0–31 mo post-HSCT (Fig. 3). Regular menstrual cycles stopped after the initiation of cancer therapy. She developed secondary amenorrhea, and estrogen replacement therapy was started from 16 yr 5 mo of age (23 mo after HSCT).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels became undetectable and showed no recovery in patient 3.

Discussion

Few studies have been designed to prospectively evaluate the longitudinal variations of AMH levels in pediatric patients treated with cancer therapy (21, 22). A marked and prompt decrease in serum AMH levels was noted in our study, with AMH levels becoming undetectable independently of the treatment protocol used. All three girls had clearly elevated concentrations of FSH (> 10 mIU/mL) and decreased AMH levels during treatment, indicating acute gonadal failure.

The pattern during the recovery phase differed depending on the protocol used. The FSH levels normalized after completion of treatment in patients 1 and 2. Notably, breast development and menarche occurred spontaneously after HSCT in patient 1; however, the AMH level became undetectable (< 0.1 ng/mL). This patient was presumed to have a high risk of premature ovarian failure, and FSH and menstruation were not helpful in this case. As we have reported previously (19), measurement of AMH concentration is useful for detecting primary gonadal deficiency, particularly among patients without increased gonadotropin levels. A biochemical evidence of the recovery of ovarian function was detected on the basis of recovery in AMH levels in patient 2.

The most appropriate timing to measure AMH should be considered for proper medical information and also take into consideration the financial cost. More than 2 yr were needed for recovery and stabilization of the AMH level in patient 2. We usually consider cancer patients as survivors at a minimum of 2 yr after cancer therapy. Therefore, we recommend AMH as suitable for patients who survive for > 2 yr, but not as an acute-phase marker.

The main physiological role of AMH seems to be the inhibition of the initial follicular recruitment from the primordial to the antral pool (15). The recovery in AMH after cancer therapy indicates restoration of the pool of small growing follicles (23). The absence of a recovery indicates a profound loss of the primordial follicle pool, which is unable to generate sufficient small, growing follicles to secrete a detectable amount of AMH. This primordial follicle loss can arise from a direct elimination effect. In addition, a recent study showed “burn-out” of the ovarian follicle reserve—that is, excessive recruitment of the primordial follicles into the growing pool due to a decrease in AMH after damage of growing follicles (24).

There are various mechanisms of ovarian damage, including apoptotic processes, cortical fibrosis, and blood vessel injury (10, 11). The degree of toxicity is dependent on the treatment variety and dosage, as well as on patient age (25, 26). The toxicity of alkylating agents has been well studied (26, 27). By using the cyclophosphamide equivalent dose (CED), 180 mg/m2 melphalan is equal to 7200 mg/m2 CED (40 × cumulative melphalan dose) in patients 1 and 3 (28).

Recently, reduced-intensity stem cell transplantation (RIST) has been used more widely to decrease the risk of complications. Shimizu et al. reported that reduced-intensity conditioning consisting of fludarabine/melphalan showed an advantage in the recovery of ovarian function in adolescent and young adult patients (29); however, they did not measure AMH levels. We have shown that the girl treated with RIST (patient 1) had a high risk of premature ovarian failure. Further study is needed in more patients with respect to this finding.

This study may help better understand ovarian toxicities associated with cancer therapy and may help predict the needs for hormone replacement therapy and fertility counseling in the future. However, there are some limitations in this survey. Large numbers of pediatric cancer patients need to be surveyed longitudinally with a more sensitive AMH assay.

In conclusion, a marked and prompt decrease in AMH levels was observed after cancer therapy. Different patterns of AMH level during the recovery phase support the significance of a longitudinal study. The optimal timing to measure serum AMH levels for evaluating ovarian reserve should not be immediately after the end of cancer therapy in CCSs, as levels may recover over time.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the staff of the Pediatric Department of Osaka University Hospital. We also thank the patients and their parents who participated in the study. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP25461544. We have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  • 1.Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research Cancer statistics in Japan – 2014. Available at: http://ganjoho.jp/en/professional/statistics/brochure/2014_en.html (accessed March 28, 2016).
  • 2.Oeffinger KC, Mertens AC, Sklar CA, Kawashima T, Hudson MM, Meadows AT, et al. Childhood Cancer Survivor StudyChronic health conditions in adult survivors of childhood cancer. N Engl J Med 2006;355: 1572–82. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa060185 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hudson MM, Ness KK, Gurney JG, Mulrooney DA, Chemaitilly W, Krull KR, et al. Clinical ascertainment of health outcomes among adults treated for childhood cancer. JAMA 2013;309: 2371–81. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.6296 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chemaitilly W, Sklar CA. Endocrine complications in long-term survivors of childhood cancers. Endocr Relat Cancer 2010;17: R141–59. doi: 10.1677/ERC-10-0002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kenney LB, Cohen LE, Shnorhavorian M, Metzger ML, Lockart B, Hijiya N, et al. Male reproductive health after childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancers: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 2012;30: 3408–16. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.6938 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Green DM, Sklar CA, Boice JD, Jr, Mulvihill JJ, Whitton JA, Stovall M, et al. Ovarian failure and reproductive outcomes after childhood cancer treatment: results from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J Clin Oncol 2009;27: 2374–81. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.1839 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Green DM, Kawashima T, Stovall M, Leisenring W, Sklar CA, Mertens AC, et al. Fertility of female survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the childhood cancer survivor study. J Clin Oncol 2009;27: 2677–85. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.1541 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Miyoshi Y, Ohta H, Hashii Y, Tokimasa S, Namba N, Mushiake S, et al. Endocrinological analysis of 122 Japanese childhood cancer survivors in a single hospital. Endocr J 2008;55: 1055–63. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.K08E-075 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Miyoshi Y, Yorifuji T, Horikawa R, Takahashi I, Nagasaki K, Ishiguro H, et al. Gonadal function, fertility, and reproductive medicine in childhood and adolescent cancer patients: a national survey of Japanese pediatric endocrinologists. Clin Pediatr Endocrinol 2016;25: 45–57. doi: 10.1297/cpe.25.45 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Morgan S, Anderson RA, Gourley C, Wallace WH, Spears N. How do chemotherapeutic agents damage the ovary? Hum Reprod Update 2012;18: 525–35. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dms022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ben-Aharon I, Shalgi R. What lies behind chemotherapy-induced ovarian toxicity? Reproduction 2012;144: 153–63. doi: 10.1530/REP-12-0121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Children’s Oncology Group Long-Term Follow-Up Guidelines for Survivors of Childhood, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancers, Version 4.0. Available at: http://www.survivorshipguidelines.org (accessed March 28, 2016).
  • 13.Childhood Cancer Survivor Committee of the Japanese Society for Pediatric Endocrinology Physician’s follow-up guide for childhood cancer survivors – 2011. Available at: http://jspe.umin.jp/medical/gui.html (accessed March 28, 2016).
  • 14.Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive MedicineTesting and interpreting measures of ovarian reserve: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2012;98: 1407–15. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ledger WL. Clinical utility of measurement of anti-mullerian hormone in reproductive endocrinology. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010;95: 5144–54. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-0701 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Krawczuk-Rybak M, Leszczynska E, Poznanska M, Zelazowska-Rutkowska B, Wysocka J. Anti-müllerian hormone as a sensitive marker of ovarian function in young cancer survivors. Int J Endocrinol. 2013;2013:125080. doi: . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 17.Lunsford AJ, Whelan K, McCormick K, McLaren JF. Antimüllerian hormone as a measure of reproductive function in female childhood cancer survivors. Fertil Steril 2014;101: 227–31. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.08.052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Charpentier AM, Chong AL, Gingras-Hill G, Ahmed S, Cigsar C, Gupta AA, et al. Anti-Müllerian hormone screening to assess ovarian reserve among female survivors of childhood cancer. J Cancer Surviv 2014;8: 548–54. doi: 10.1007/s11764-014-0364-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Miyoshi Y, Ohta H, Namba N, Tachibana M, Miyamura T, Miyashita E, et al. Low serum concentrations of anti-Müllerian hormone are common in 53 female childhood cancer survivors. Horm Res Paediatr 2013;79: 17–21. doi: 10.1159/000346139 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hagen CP, Aksglaede L, Sørensen K, Main KM, Boas M, Cleemann L, et al. Serum levels of anti-Müllerian hormone as a marker of ovarian function in 926 healthy females from birth to adulthood and in 172 Turner syndrome patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010;95: 5003–10. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-0930 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Brougham MF, Crofton PM, Johnson EJ, Evans N, Anderson RA, Wallace WH. Anti-Müllerian hormone is a marker of gonadotoxicity in pre- and postpubertal girls treated for cancer: a prospective study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012;97: 2059–67. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-3180 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Peigné M, Decanter C. Serum AMH level as a marker of acute and long-term effects of chemotherapy on the ovarian follicular content: a systematic review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2014;12: 26. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-12-26 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hansen KR, Hodnett GM, Knowlton N, Craig LB. Correlation of ovarian reserve tests with histologically determined primordial follicle number. Fertil Steril 2011;95: 170–5. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Meirow D, Biederman H, Anderson RA, Wallace WH. Toxicity of chemotherapy and radiation on female reproduction. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2010;53: 727–39. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e3181f96b54 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wallace WH, Anderson RA, Irvine DS. Fertility preservation for young patients with cancer: who is at risk and what can be offered? Lancet Oncol 2005;6: 209–18. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70092-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Loren AW, Mangu PB, Beck LN, Brennan L, Magdalinski AJ, Partridge AH, et al. American Society of Clinical OncologyFertility preservation for patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 2013;31: 2500–10. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.49.2678 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Thomas-Teinturier C, Allodji RS, Svetlova E, Frey MA, Oberlin O, Millischer AE, et al. Ovarian reserve after treatment with alkylating agents during childhood. Hum Reprod 2015;30: 1437–46. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev060 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Green DM, Nolan VG, Goodman PJ, Whitton JA, Srivastava D, Leisenring WM, et al. The cyclophosphamide equivalent dose as an approach for quantifying alkylating agent exposure: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2014;61: 53–67. doi: 10.1002/pbc.24679 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Shimizu M, Sawada A, Yamada K, Kondo O, Koyama-Sato M, Shimizu S, et al. Encouraging results of preserving ovarian function after allo-HSCT with RIC. Bone Marrow Transplant 2012;47: 141–2. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2011.14 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Pediatric Endocrinology are provided here courtesy of IPEC, Inc.

RESOURCES