Abstract
Nanotechnology provides various nanomaterials with tremendous functionalities for cancer diagnostics and therapeutics. Recently, theranostics has been developed as an alternative strategy for efficient cancer treatment through combination of imaging diagnosis and therapeutic interventions under the guidance of diagnostic results. Ultrasound (US) imaging shows unique advantages with excellent features of real-time imaging, low cost, high safety and portability, making US contrast agents (UCAs) an ideal platform for construction of cancer theranostic agents. This review focuses on the development of nanomaterials incorporated multifunctional UCAs serving as theranostic agents for cancer diagnostics and therapeutics, via conjugation of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIOs), CuS nanoparticles, DNA, siRNA, gold nanoparticles (GNPs), gold nanorods (GNRs), gold nanoshell (GNS), graphene oxides (GOs), polypyrrole (PPy) nanocapsules, Prussian blue (PB) nanoparticles and so on to different types of UCAs. The cancer treatment could be more effectively and accurately carried out under the guidance and monitoring with the help of the achieved theranostic agents. Furthermore, nanomaterials incorporated theranostic agents based on UCAs can be designed and constructed by demand for personalized and accurate treatment of cancer, demonstrating their great potential to address the challenges of cancer heterogeneity and adaptation, which can provide alternative strategies for cancer diagnosis and therapeutics.
Keywords: cancer, theranostics, ultrasound contrast agents, nanomaterials, nanomedicine
Introduction
Nanotechnology is a multidisciplinary research field involving physics, chemistry, biology, engineering, material science and clinical medicine, providing a variety of nanoscale materials with extraordinary features for diagnostics and therapeutics of cancer 1- 6. In the recent years, a unique cancer treatment strategy, theranostics, has been developed by combination of imaging diagnosis and imaging guided therapeutic interventions to enable accurate detection and personalized treatment of cancer with high efficacy 7- 12. Theranostics can deliver both diagnostic and imaging-guided therapeutic functions simultaneously, which can address the challenges of cancer heterogeneity and adaptation 13, 14. Therefore, nanomaterials with excellent nature of easy functionalization and significant biocompatibility as well as their optical, electronic, magnetic and structural properties, are ideal candidates as theranostic nanomedicine for cancer diagnosis and therapy. Furthermore, the combination of various imaging modalities could make it possible to carry out cancer therapy under the guidance of multi-modal contrast imaging, achieving visualized and personalized treatment of cancer 15, 16.
There are several medical imaging methods for clinical cancer diagnosis, including X-ray computed tomography (CT), ultrasound (US) imaging, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission computed tomography (PET) and so on. Among all the diagnostic imaging techniques, US has its unique advantage due to its features of real-time, low cost, and high safety 17, making it the ideal candidate for imaging guided cancer therapy. With the use of ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs), the resolution and sensitivity of clinical US imaging have made great improvements 18- 20. Typical UCAs are microbubbles (MBs) that composed of an inner gaseous core with a thin shell coating. The shell materials including proteins 21, saccharides 22, surfactants 23, polymers 24 and lipids 25 are used to form a protective layer outside the inner gas cores like air, nitrogen, sulfur hexafluoride (SF 6) and perfluorocarbons (PFCs) 26- 28.
Two or more biomedical imaging techniques are usually applied together in clinic to reach more reliable diagnostic results, since each imaging modality has its specific advantages as well as limitations. Therefore, in the recent years, the idea of using multimodal imaging modalities in combination has attracted the attention of researchers 29. US could display real-time images, nevertheless, its spatial and anatomical resolution is relatively poor compared to other imaging methods. The disadvantages of US might be overcomed by the integration of other imaging modalities with excellent spatial and anatomical resolution. Therefore, multimodal imaging agents composed of UCAs incorporated with other imaging probes could provide more detailed and accurate diagnostic results for better guidance of cancer treatment. Furthermore, by integration of proper nanomaterials with therapeutic functionalities, theranostic agents based on UCAs could be constructed for cancer treatment.
In this review, we will focus on the latest development on nanomaterials incorporated multifunctional UCAs serving as theranostic agents for multimodal imaging and cancer therapy, via combination of different types of UCAs and nanomaterials including superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIOs), CuS nanoparticles, DNA, gold nanoparticles (GNPs), gold nanorods (GNRs), gold nanoshell (GNS), graphene oxides (GOs), Prussian blue (PB) nanoparticles, and polypyrrole (PPy) nanocapsules, etc. ( Figure 1 ). This review will provide a comprehensive design and fabrication of nanomaterials incorporated UCAs for cancer theranostics.
Theranostic agents based on protein UCAs
Feinstein et al. 30 reported in 1984 that the albumin in the blood improved the stability of hand-made MB UCAs and sonication produced more stable MBs with controlled size. It resulted in the first commercial UCA, Albunex 31 (Molecular Biosystems), which consisted of air-filled albumin MBs ranging from 1 to 15 μm with more than 95% being smaller than 10 μm. Albumin-based UCAs are widely used in clinical diagnosis and research field.
Gold nanomaterials exhibit good biocompatibility as well as magnificent optical and electronic properties, making them possible to be used in biological and medical applications 32. GNRs have well-defined shapes and their longitudinal plasmon resonances (LPRs) can be finely tuned as a function of aspect ratio to the near infrared (NIR) region, a spectral window which permits photons to penetrate biological tissues with relatively high transmittivity 33. Recently, Wang and co-workers 34 developed GNRs loaded albumin microbubbles (AuMBs) for combined US and photoacoustic imaging and photothermal therapy. AuMBs were fabricated by sonication of the solution containing 2.67 nM GNRs, 2% human serum albumin, 0.04% (w/v) avidin and filling with PFC (C 3F 8) gas, then modified via biotin-avidin technique to result in antimouse VEGFR2 targeted AuMBs. In vivo ultrasonography revealed that the targeted AuMBs could identify the angiogenesis region in the tumor and extend the retention time for longer US imaging. The GNRs could induce photoacoustic imaging and thermal therapy under NIR irradiation, demonstrating the combined diagnostic and therapeutic properties of AuMBs.
Theranostic agents based on lipid/surfactant UCAs
Lipids 25, 35 and surfactants 23 are extensively used as shell materials to fabricate MBs UCAs due to their capabilities to lower the surface tension and stabilize MBs via forming a coating layer 19. Amphiphilic molecules can self-assemble into a monolayer shell at the interface between the gas core and surrounding aqueous medium to form gas-filled MBs. When the MBs are exposed to US, they start to cavitate. The microstreams and shock waves generated during cavitation may lead to a local release of drugs loaded on the MBs. At the same time, temporary perforate cell membranes (sonoporation) may occur to result in the intracellular delivery of the released drugs. Furthermore, the microjets and shock waves could also permeabilize blood vessels, allowing the release of high molecular weight drugs and nanoparticles 36- 39. Therefore, MBs with anticancer drugs or functional nanomaterials payload could serve as efficient US triggered delivery system for imaging guided cancer treatment.
SPIOs are widely applied T2-weighted MRI contrast agents, which can provide a safe and strong negative contrast enhancement of the target lesion in MRI due to their high susceptibility and biocompatibility 40- 43. Fan’s group developed multi-functional phospholipid coated C 3F 8 encapsulated MBs loaded with therapeutic agent (doxorubicin, DOX) and MRI contrast agents SPIOs via adapted thin-film hydration method 44. The blood-brain barrier (BBB) can be reversibly opened without damaging the neurons by US MB cavitation within the cerebral microvasculature for delivery of therapeutic compounds to the brain 45. Thus, the in vivo experiments proved that the DOX-SPIO-MBs could temporarily open the BBB and perform drug delivery to the brain due to cavitation upon the focused US exposure. Besides, they can carry out dual modal MRI/US contrast imaging diagnosis, and magnetic targeting to achieve enhanced drug delivery for imaging guided tumor treatment. Based on this study, they further fabricated a therapeutic SPIO-DOX (SD) complex that can be conjugated to MBs (SD-MB). The SD-MB could targeted release SD complexes through BBB under focused US exposure to allow dual modal brain imaging and drug delivery for chemotherapy 46. Moreover, their group also incorporated SPIOs into drug-embedded acoustic droplets to allow both magnetism-assisted targeting and MRI guided US-triggered acoustic droplet vaporization, which is a mechanical and chemical theranostic strategy for tumor treatment 47. The developed theranostic agents may provide a novel strategy for future imaging guided therapy of brain tumors.
MB UCAs have been developed as image-guided promising vehicles of genes for targeted delivery. Sono-poration is an effective method of promoting extravasation of large macromolecules, such as plasmid DNA, to improve delivery to tissue beyond the vasculature 48- 50. Branched polyethylenimine (PEI) was modified with polyethylene glycol (PEG) and thiol. The resulted PEI-PEG was then covalently attached to maleimide groups on lipid MB UCAs. Polyplex-MBs was prepared by loading DNA to achieve increased circulation in the bloodstream and decreased non specific adhesion. A luciferase bioluminescence reporter plasmid DNA was coupled to the PEI-MBs, and site-specific delivery was fulfilled using US applied over the tumor area following bolus injection of the DNA/PEI-MBs, showing over 10-fold higher bioluminescence from the tumor region compared to the untreated 51. It suggested that the PEI-MB UCAs would offer improved control of DNA loading for US-guided tissue transfection and gene therapy of cancer 52.
siRNA-loaded nanobubbles (siRNA-NBs) were also developed via hetero-assembling strategy by Shuai’s group using siRNA-complexed polymeric micelles and gas-cored lipid nanobubbles. Sufficient tumor accumulation of the nanoscale siRNA-NBs can be achieved via the EPR effect, allowing efficient delivery of siRNA micelles into cancer cells with the help of US exposure for imaging guided gene therapy 53. It indicates that US sensitive micro/nanobubble UCAs with DNA/siRNA payloads could act as potential theranostic platform for US-trigged and guided gene therapy.
CuS nanoparticles could penetrate into the tumor interstitium for efficient ablation of tumor cells due to their NIR absorption and small size 54- 56. Furthermore, the NIR absorption of CuS nanoparticles is derived from d-d transition of Cu 2+ ions, which is not affected by the solvent or the surrounding environment 54. Therefore, using surfactant MB ST68 57- 60 as a template, CuS nanoparticles loaded MBs (CuS-ST68 MBs) was constructed by depositing photothermal conducting CuS nanoparticles onto the outer surface of gas-filled MBs, which consisted of inert C 3F 8 gas and a monolayer shell of surfactant mixtures of Span 60 and Tween 80. In vitro and in vivo ultrasonography proved the contrast-enhancement capability of CuS-ST68 MBs. Besides, targeted CuS nanoparticles delivery using US-targeted MB destruction (UTMD) 36, 38, 61, 62 to destroy tumor cells by the photothermal effect could be fulfilled by CuS-ST68 MBs as well ( Figure 2 ) 63.
Theranostic agents based on polymeric UCAs
Polymeric microcapsules, typically composed of poly lactic acid (PLA) with outstanding biocompatibility and biodegradability, could serve as UCAs with good US contrast-enhanced capabilities and other advantages: they have good mechanical strength to be stable; they can load either hydrophilic or hydrophobic species or both during the double emulsion fabrication procedure to become functionalized; they are surface-charged and have functional groups on the surface so that they could be easily modified to acquire more utilities such as site-targeted capability 24, 64, 65.
By constructing echogenic PLA microcapsules employing the water-in-oil-in-water (W/O/W) double emulsion method 24, 64, 65, GNR-loaded PLA microcapsules have been developed for combined US contrast imaging and photothermal therapy via electrostatic adsorption of GNRs on the microcapsule surfaces under the help of polyelectrolytes 66. GNS was introduced to substitute GNRs to achieve higher payload of gold nanomaterials on microcapsules. GNS has a spherical dielectric core particle and a thin nanoscale gold shell around with highly tunable plasmon resonance, which determines the absorbing and scattering properties of the composite particles. By controlling the thickness of the gold shell and the diameter of the core, the plasmon resonance and the resulting optical absorption of GNSs can be tuned to the region of NIR, where the absorption of human tissues is minimal and penetration is optimal 67. The strong optical absorption of nanoshell can rapidly increase the local temperature under the NIR irradiation 68. Therefore, a novel multifunctional theranostic agent based on gold nanoshelled microcapsules (GNS-MCs) was designed and prepared by the electrostatic adsorption of GNPs on the PLA microcapsule surfaces as seeds, and the formation of GNS by surface seeding method ( Figure 3 A-C ) 69. The microcapsules can cross pulmonary capillaries and show systemic enhancement. When irradiated with NIR radiation, GNS-MCs could raise the local temperature so that cancer cells were killed with surroundings remains unharmed.
Using BT474 breast cancer xenografted models, GNS-MCs were able to serve as an US enhancer to guide the intratumoral injection and ensure their uniform distribution. In vivo studies showed the intratumoral temperature could be heated up to nearly 70 °C for 8 min when treated with GNS-MCs injection with NIR laser irradiation, resulting in the gradual tumor volume decrease with 6 out of 7 mice cured at 17 days after treatment. It demonstrated that US imaging-guided photothermal therapy with theranostic GNS-MCs would be a promising technique for in situ treatment of breast cancer ( Figure 3 D and E ) 70.
Although US imaging could display the real-time images with higher contrast under the help of UCAs, the resolution of the US images is relatively poor compared to other imaging methods, and the imaging process can be easily interfered by bone- and gas-filled structures like the brain and stomach. The drawbacks of US happen to be the merits of CT with excellent spatial resolution based on density. Therefore, it might be a great combination of US and CT for better diagnostics to guide and monitor the cancer therapy. GNPs with large atomic number (z=79), high X-ray absorption coefficient (5.16 cm 2/g at 100 keV), and especially the great biocompatibility and non-toxicity 71- 73, could be the ideal candidates for contrast-enhanced CT imaging 74- 77. On the other hand, GOs exhibit superior optical absorption in the NIR region and photothermal conversion, large surface area and lower cost compared with noble metal nanoparticles, making GOs an appealing candidate for photothermal ablation of cancer 78. Thus, theranostic microcapsules were successfully fabricated by introducing GNPs into PLA microcapsules with depositing GO onto the surface via electrostatic layer-by-layer self-assembly technique. The obtained microcapsules could serve as a contrast agent to simultaneously enhance US and CT imaging greatly both in vitro and in vivo. As an effective photothermal enhancer, the NIR laser light ablated the tumor completely within 9 days in the presence of the microcapsules and the tumor growth inhibition rate was 83.8% ( Figure 4 ) 78.
SPIOs could also be integrated into polymer UCAs for MRI contrast enhancement. Using PLA/PLGA or Pluronic F127 based UCAs as an encapsulation vehicle, SPIOs were loaded by emulsion methods 79, with other functional materials like DOX 80, Carmustine (bis-chloroethylni-trosourea, BCNU) 81 and GOs 82. Huang et al. 81 designed and prepared SPIO-stabilized and BCNU-loaded nanobubbles based on the thermosensitive polymer F127 and polyacrylic acid (PAA). Both US and MRI contrast enhanced imaging were achieved with the help of the multifunctional contrast agents. Moreover, under the external magnetic targeting, higher US and MR signals could be displayed compared to the same site without magnetic targeting. The tumor growth profile of different treatment revealed that, the tumors exhibited half the growth rate of the control group with injection of BCNU loaded nanobubbles and high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) exposure, showing the significant tumor inhibition. The multifunctional system for dual-modal US/MRI imaging guided HIFU therapy and US triggered drug delivery would provide a potential alternative solution for efficient and imaging-guided cancer treatment 82.
PPy materials have received great attention in bioelectronics and biomedical application due to their inherent features, including high conductivity, outstanding stability and good biocompatibility 83- 85. PPy NPs have been demonstrated as an attractive and photothermal agent with high photothermal conversion efficiency for tumor ablation owing to the strong NIR absorption spectrum 86. Therefore, a photothermal UCA of PPy hollow microspheres (PPyHMs) was first time constructed from the PPy polymer via a facile oil-in-water (O/W) microemulsion method. PPyHMs could generate US contrast consistently with the echo signals for no less than 5 min, and completely ablate the tumor in the presence of NIR laser light 87.
Theranostic agents based on liquid PFC UCAs
PFCs with unique properties such as high oxygen solubility, low surface tension, hydrophobicity and lipophobicity, inertness and absence of metabolism, safety and biocompatibility, have been developed for various medical purposes 88, 89. Because of their high difference of density with air and their poor solubility in water, liquid PFCs such as perfluorooctyl bromide (PFOB) have been encapsulated in the biodegradable and biocompatible polymeric shells to prepare nano-scale UCAs with great stability and echogenicity 90, 91. Unlike blood-pool MB based UCAs, nano-sized UCAs are advantageous for tumor imaging mainly due to their unique size range that promotes a high tissue extravasation rate, resulting in an increased number of agents passing through the vessels feeding the tumor to achieve satisfactory imaging 92, 93.
As mentioned above, gold nanomaterials could serve as CT contrast agent due to their high X-ray absorption coefficient. GNS is widely used as “light-activated nanoscopic heater” to significantly enhance the efficiency of photothermal therapy 94, 95. Therefore, gold nanoshelled PFOB nanocapsule UCAs were developed for US/CT imaging guided photothermal ablation of tumors. It’s the first report of GNS serving as the dual-functional nanomaterials for both CT contrast imaging and photothermal tumor ablation 96. Gold nanoshelled PFOB nanocapsules (PGsP NCs) were constructed by the same gold seeding method 69 on the PFOB nanocapsules generated via an adapted oil-in-water emulsion solvent evaporation process 90, with surface PEG modification to increase anti-fouling capabilities for long circulation time. In vivo US/CT contrast imaging was successfully carried out through intravenous injection of PGsP NCs. Using human glioblastoma tumor-bearing nude mice as xenograft models, the local temperature of tumors could be heated up to about 60 ℃ with the irradiation of 808 nm NIR laser, and the temperature lasted more than 7 min during the whole 10 min exposure, ensuring the effective thermal ablation of tumors. On 16th day after treatment, the tumor shrunk 67.6% in tumor size with 5 out of 8 mice cured. Compared with control group, the tumor growth was inhibited by 96.7%, suggesting great treatment effect of PGsP NCs induced photothermal tumor ablation 96.
By incorporation of SPIOs into the gold nanoshelled PFOB nanocapsules, a novel theranostic nano-UCA, PGS-SP NCs were obtained for dual-modal US/MRI contrast imaging guided photothermal therapy 97. PGS-SP NCs could be not only used for the guidance under US contrast imaging, but also applicable via intravenous administration to targetly accumulate in the tumor sites for MRI guidance due to the EPR effect. The abnormalities in the tumor tissue lead to higher permeability of tumor vessels to the nanocapsules compared with normal vessels, and the impaired clearance of the nanocapsules from the interstitial space of the tumor could result in targeted accumulation on tumor sites (due to longer retention enhanced by PEGylation) 6. The targeted accumulated nanocapsules can display the tumor areas to guide the NIR laser irradiation for photothermal ablation of tumors without damaging the surrounding healthy tissues. The tumor growth was inhibited by 82.2% by two times of intravenous injection of PGS-SP NCs with NIR laser irradiation, suggesting that sufficient accumulation of PGS-SP NCs could trigger the great photothermal effect locally for effective photothermal tumor ablation ( Figure 5 ).
Niu et al. 98 developed SPIOs and PFOB co-loaded organic/inorganic hybrid vesicles via facile self-assembly/sol-gel approach for dual-modality US/MR imaging and guided HIFU ablation. With the help of the theranostic agent, the focused US can be precisely located on the VX2 tumor tissue in the liver of rabbits under MRI guidance for enhanced HIFU therapeutic efficacy. Using PPy as loading materials as well as photothermal absorbers, PFOB encapsulated PPy nanocapsules were obtained. Owing to the encapsulated liquid PFOB and strong NIR absorption of PPy polymeric shell, the resulted PPy nanocapsules showed great promise in US imaging guided photothermal ablation of xenografted tumors without inducing any significant side effect 99.
Apart from various organic polymers as protective shells outside the liquid PFC cores, inorganic nanomaterials could also be utilized to form hollow nanostructures with PFC in the inner cavities. Shi’s group constructed a nanometer-sized inorganic enhancement agent (MSNC-PFH) for HIFU treatment of cancer, which consists of mesoporous silica nanocapsules (MSNCs) as the shell and encapsulated temperature-sensitive perfluorohexane (PFH) as bubble generator 100. With exposure to HIFU, PFH bubbles could be generated and released through the mesopore channels of MSNCs for contrast enhanced US imaging, owing to the HIFU-induced local temperature rise. Moreover, HIFU therapeutic efficacy can be significantly enhanced by the generated PFH bubble, which can offer a unique superiority in localized tumor necrosis and drug delivery.
PB is a conventional dye used for hundreds of years. PB nanoparticles have been developed recently for catalysts, contrast agents, drug carriers, photoacoustic tomography and photothermal therapy 101. Jia et al. 101 fabricated phase transition hydrophobic liquid PFC perfluoropentane (PFP) encapsulated hollow PB nanocubes (HPB-PFP) for cancer theranostics. The PB shell could induce excellent photothermal effect under NIR laser irradiation, resulting in not only superior photothermal therapeutics but also PFP gasfication and bubble formation for enhanced US contrast imaging. In vivo tumor imaging demonstrated significant signal enhancement could be observed with HPB-PFP injection and laser exposure. The enhanced US images could be utilized for better diagnosis and guidance of photothermal tumor ablation, making HPB-PFP a potential theranostic nanomedicine for cancer treatment 101.
Summary and perspectives
Numerous functional nanomaterials including SPIOs, CuS nanoparticles, GNPs/GNRs/GNS, DNA, siRNA, GO, PPy nanocapsules and PB nanoparticles have been incorporated to different types of UCAs to obtain additional functionalities for cancer diagnosis and therapeutics. The differences among UCAs for preparation of theranostic agents are shown in Table 1 . Protein-based UCAs were the first commercial products available in the market due to the great biocompatibility. However, the relatively poor stability limits their functional modification, with rare reports in the construction of theranostic agents. Lipid/Surfactant-based UCAs are extensively studied for contrast enhanced imaging and UTMD drug delivery due to the excellent echogenicity and their similarity to conventional drug carriers such as liposomes or micelles. Nevertheless, the nanomaterials could not be easily incorporated into lipid/surfactant UCAs owing to the instability of their soft shells. On the contrary, polymeric UCAs with tremendous stability and easy functional decoration capability were able to load various nanomaterials to prepare multifunctional theranostic agents. Although exhibiting mediocre echogenicity, polymeric UCAs could facilitate HIFU therapy, providing potential alternative functionalities for theranostic agents. Unlike the other three types of blood-pool MB UCAs, liquid PFC encapsulated UCAs with nanomaterial payloads could be generated in nano-scale sizes, leading to enhanced vessel permeability to improve tumor targeting and retention for efficient tumor imaging and therapy. With proper optimization and rational design, the well-constructed nanomaterials incorporated nano-UCAs based on liquid PFC might have great potential for clinical application of cancer theranostics.
1.
Types | Stability | Echogenicity | Biocompatibility | Functional modification | Other features | Incorporated nanomaterials |
Protein UCAs | Poor | Fair | Good | Poor | - | GNRs 34 |
Lipid/surfactant UCAs | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | UTMD | SPIOs 44- 47, DNA 51, 52, SiRNA 53, CuS 63 |
Polymeric UCAs | Good | Fair | Fair | Good | HIFU | GNRs 66, GNS 69, 70, GNPs 78, GOs 78, 82, SPIOs 81, 82, PPy 87 |
Liquid PFC UCAs | Fair | Poor | Fair | Fair | Enhanced permeability | GNS 96, 97, SPIOs 97, 98, PPy 99, Silica 100, PB 101 |
The cancer treatment could be more effectively and accurately carried out under the guidance and monitoring via multimodal imaging with the achieved multifunctional UCAs. In the cancer theranostic procedure, multimodal imaging guidance could display dynamic complementary information about the tumors for planning, targeting, monitoring, controlling and assessing treatment response for the therapeutic treatment, which helps alter the treatment strategy accordingly with personalization and high efficacy. Notably, all the procedures in the whole cancer treatment based on theranostic UCAs could be noninvasive or minimally invasive to avoid unnecessary risks. Moreover, the nanomaterial-loaded UCAs could be designed and developed by demand for personalized treatment of cancer, which makes nanomaterials incorporated multifunctional UCAs involved treatment strategy a potential alternative methodology for noninvasive cancer theranostics.
Acknowledgments
This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81501585), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China (Grant No. BK20150348), the Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (Grant No. 15KJB310019), and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2015M570475 and 2016T90496).
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflicts of interest are disclosed.
References
- 1.Ferrari M. Cancer nanotechnology: opportunities and challenges. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5:161–71. doi: 10.1038/nrc1566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wang X, Yang L, Chen ZG, Shin DM. Application of nanotechnology in cancer therapy and imaging. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:97–110. doi: 10.3322/CA.2007.0003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cuenca AG, Jiang H, Hochwald SN, Delano M, Cance WG, Grobmyer SR. Emerging implications of nanotechnology on cancer diagnostics and therapeutics. Cancer. 2006;107:459–66. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nie S, Xing Y, Kim GJ, Simons JW. Nanotechnology applications in cancer. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2007;9:257–88. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.9.060906.152025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Farokhzad OC, Langer R. Nanomedicine: developing smarter therapeutic and diagnostic modalities. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2006;58:1456–9. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2006.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Barreto JA, O'Malley W, Kubeil M, Graham B, Stephan H, Spiccia L. Nanomaterials: applications in cancer imaging and therapy. Adv Mater. 2011;23:H18–40. doi: 10.1002/adma.201100140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Warner S. Diagnostics plus therapy = theranostics. Scientist. 2004;18:38–9. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lammers T, Kiessling F, Hennink WE, Storm G. Nanotheranostics and image-guided drug delivery: current concepts and future directions. Mol Pharm. 2010;7:1899–912. doi: 10.1021/mp100228v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sun D. Nanotheranostics: integration of imaging and targeted drug delivery. Mol Pharm. 2010;7:1879. doi: 10.1021/mp1003652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mura S, Couvreur P. Nanotheranostics for personalized medicine. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012;64:1394–416. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chen XY, Gambhlr SS, Cheon J. Theranostic Nanomedicine. Acc Chem Res. 2011;44:841. doi: 10.1021/ar200231d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mikhaylov G, Mikac U, Magaeva AA, Itin VI, Naiden EP, Psakhye I, et al. Ferri-liposomes as an MRI-visible drug-delivery system for targeting tumours and their microenvironment. Nat Nanotechnol. 2011;6:594–602. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2011.112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sumer B, Gao JM. Theranostic nanomedicine for cancer. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2008;3:137–40. doi: 10.2217/17435889.3.2.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Melancon MP, Zhou M, Li C. Cancer Theranostics with Near-Infrared Light-Activatable Multimodal Nanoparticles. Acc Chem Res. 2011;44:947–56. doi: 10.1021/ar200022e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Xie J, Lee S, Chen XY. Nanoparticle-based theranostic agents. Adv Drug Deliver Rev. 2010;62:1064–79. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2010.07.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cho NH, Cheong TC, Min JH, Wu JH, Lee SJ, Kim D, et al. A multifunctional core-shell nanoparticle for dendritic cell-based cancer immunotherapy. Nat Nanotechnol. 2011;6:675–82. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2011.149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Liu Z, Kiessling F, Gätjens J. Advanced Nanomaterials in Multimodal Imaging: Design, Functionalization, and Biomedical Applications. J Nanomater. 2010;2010:894303. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Cosgrove D. Ultrasound contrast agents: An overview. Eur J Radiol. 2006;60:324–30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.06.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Xing ZW, Ke HT, Wang JR, Zhao B, Yue XL, Dai ZF, et al. Novel ultrasound contrast agent based on microbubbles generated from surfactant mixtures of Span 60 and polyoxyethylene 40 stearate. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:3542–9. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Xing ZW, Wang JR, Ke HT, Zhao B, Yue XL, Dai ZF, et al. The fabrication of novel nanobubble ultrasound contrast agent for potential tumor imaging. Nanotechnology. 2010;21:145607. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/21/14/145607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Barnhart J, Levene H, Villapando E, Maniquis J, Fernandez J, Rice S, et al. Characteristics of Albunex: air-filled albumin microspheres for echocardiography contrast enhancement. Invest Radiol. 1990;25 Suppl 1:S162–4. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199009001-00070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Smith MD, Elion JL, McClure RR, Kwan OL, DeMaria AN. Left heart opacification with peripheral venous injection of a new saccharide echo contrast agent in dogs. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;13:1622–8. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(89)90357-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Singhal S, Moser CC, Wheatley MA. Surfactant-stabilized microbubbles as ultrasound contrast agents: stability study of Span 60 and Tween 80 mixtures using a Langmuir trough. Langmuir. 1993;9:2426–9. [Google Scholar]
- 24.El-Sherif DM, Wheatley MA. Development of a novel method for synthesis of a polymeric ultrasound contrast agent. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003;66:347–55. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.10586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hasik MJ, Kim DH, Howle LE, Needham D, Prush DP. Evaluation of synthetic phospholipid ultrasound contrast agents. Ultrasonics. 2002;40:973–82. doi: 10.1016/s0041-624x(02)00384-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Arthur Kort IK. Microbubble formation: In vitro and in vivo observation . J Clin Ultrasound. 1982;10:117–20. doi: 10.1002/jcu.1870100306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Blomley MJK, Cooke JC, Unger EC, Monaghan MJ, Cosgrove DO. Science, medicine, and the future-Microbubble contrast agents: a new era in ultrasound. Br Med J. 2001;322:1222–5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7296.1222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Raisinghani A, DeMaria AN. Physical principles of microbubble ultrasound contrast agents. Am J Cardiol. 2002;90:3J–7J. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02858-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Louie AY. Multimodality Imaging Probes: Design and Challenges. Chem Rev. 2010;110:3146–95. doi: 10.1021/cr9003538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Feinstein SB, Ten Cate FJ, Zwehl W, Ong K, Maurer G, Tei C, et al. Two-dimensional contrast echocardiography. I. In vitro development and quantitative analysis of echo contrast agents . J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984;3:14–20. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(84)80424-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Walker R, Wiencek JG, Aronson S, Zaroff J, Glock D, Thisted R, et al. The influence of intravenous Albunex injections on pulmonary arterial pressure, gas exchange, and left ventricular peak intensity. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1992;5:463–70. doi: 10.1016/s0894-7317(14)80036-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lim YT, Park OO, Jung HT. Gold nanolayer-encapsulated silica particles synthesized by surface seeding and shell growing method: near infrared responsive materials. J Colloid Interf Sci. 2003;263:449–53. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9797(03)00322-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tong L, Wei QS, Wei A, Cheng JX. Gold Nanorods as Contrast Agents for Biological Imaging: Optical Properties, Surface Conjugation and Photothermal Effects. Photochem Photobiol. 2009;85:21–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2008.00507.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wang YH, Liao AH, Chen JH, Chris Wang CR, Li PC. Photoacoustic/ultrasound dual-modality contrast agent and its application to thermotherapy. J Biomed Opt. 2012;17:0450011. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.17.4.045001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Klibanov AL. Targeted delivery of gas-filled microspheres, contrast agents for ultrasound imaging. Adv Drug Deliver Rev. 1999;37:139–57. doi: 10.1016/s0169-409x(98)00104-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lindner JR. Microbubbles in medical imaging: current applications and future directions. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004;3:527–32. doi: 10.1038/nrd1417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lentacker I, De Smedt SC, Sanders NN. Drug loaded microbubble design for ultrasound triggered delivery. Soft Matter. 2009;5:2161–70. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hernot S, Klibanov AL. Microbubbles in ultrasound-triggered drug and gene delivery. Adv Drug Deliver Rev. 2008;60:1153–66. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2008.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Pitt WG, Husseini GA, Staples BJ. Ultrasonic drug delivery--a general review. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2004;1:37–56. doi: 10.1517/17425247.1.1.37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Laurent S, Forge D, Port M, Roch A, Robic C, Vander Elst L, et al. Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, stabilization, vectorization, physicochemical characterizations, and biological applications. Chem Rev. 2008;108:2064–110. doi: 10.1021/cr068445e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Yoo D, Lee JH, Shin TH, Cheon J. Theranostic Magnetic Nanoparticles. Accounts Chem Res. 2011;44:863–74. doi: 10.1021/ar200085c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Lee JH, Huh YM, Jun YW, Seo JW, Jang JT, Song HT, et al. Artificially engineered magnetic nanoparticles for ultra-sensitive molecular imaging. Nat Med. 2007;13:95–9. doi: 10.1038/nm1467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ghosh D, Lee Y, Thomas S, Kohli AG, Yun DS, Belcher AM, et al. M13-templated magnetic nanoparticles for targeted in vivo imaging of prostate cancer . Nat Nanotechnol. 2012;7:677–82. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2012.146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Fan CH, Ting CY, Lin HJ, Wang CH, Liu HL, Yen TC, et al. SPIO-conjugated, doxorubicin-loaded microbubbles for concurrent MRI and focused-ultrasound enhanced brain-tumor drug delivery. Biomaterials. 2013;34:3706–15. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.01.099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Unger EC, Porter T, Culp W, Labell R, Matsunaga T, Zutshi R. Therapeutic applications of lipid-coated microbubbles. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2004;56:1291–314. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2003.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Fan CH, Cheng YH, Ting CY, Ho YJ, Hsu PH, Liu HL, et al. Ultrasound/Magnetic Targeting with SPIO-DOX-Microbubble Complex for Image-Guided Drug Delivery in Brain Tumors. Theranostics. 2016;6:1542–56. doi: 10.7150/thno.15297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Wang CH, Kang ST, Yeh CK. Superparamagnetic iron oxide and drug complex-embedded acoustic droplets for ultrasound targeted theranosis. Biomaterials. 2013;34:1852–61. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.11.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Deckers R, Moonen CT. Ultrasound triggered, image guided, local drug delivery. J Control Release. 2010;148:25–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.07.117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Bohmer MR, Chlon CH, Raju BI, Chin CT, Shevchenko T, Klibanov AL. Focused ultrasound and microbubbles for enhanced extravasation. J Control Release. 2010;148:18–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.06.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Klibanov AL, Shevchenko TI, Raju BI, Seip R, Chin CT. Ultrasound-triggered release of materials entrapped in microbubble-liposome constructs: a tool for targeted drug delivery. J Control Release. 2010;148:13–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.07.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Sirsi SR, Hernandez SL, Zielinski L, Blomback H, Koubaa A, Synder M, et al. Polyplex-microbubble hybrids for ultrasound-guided plasmid DNA delivery to solid tumors. J Control Release. 2012;157:224–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.09.071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Jin Q, Wang Z, Yan F, Deng Z, Ni F, Wu J, et al. A novel cationic microbubble coated with stearic acid-modified polyethylenimine to enhance DNA loading and gene delivery by ultrasound. PLoS One. 2013;8:e76544. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Yin T, Wang P, Li J, Zheng R, Zheng B, Cheng D, et al. Ultrasound-sensitive siRNA-loaded nanobubbles formed by hetero-assembly of polymeric micelles and liposomes and their therapeutic effect in gliomas. Biomaterials. 2013;34:4532–43. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.02.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Li Y, Lu W, Huang Q, Huang M, Li C, Chen W. Copper sulfide nanoparticles for photothermal ablation of tumor cells. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2010;5:1161–71. doi: 10.2217/nnm.10.85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Zhang G, Yang Z, Lu W, Zhang R, Huang Q, Tian M, et al. Influence of anchoring ligands and particle size on the colloidal stability and in vivo biodistribution of polyethylene glycol-coated gold nanoparticles in tumor-xenografted mice . Biomaterials. 2009;30:1928–36. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Burns AA, Vider J, Ow H, Herz E, Penate-Medina O, Baumgart M, et al. Fluorescent silica nanoparticles with efficient urinary excretion for nanomedicine. Nano Lett. 2009;9:442–8. doi: 10.1021/nl803405h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Wheatley MA, Singhal S. Structural Studies on Stabilized Microbubbles - Development of a Novel Contrast Agent for Diagnostic Ultrasound. React Polym. 1995;25:157–66. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Wang W, Moser CC, Wheatley MA. Langmuir trough study of surfactant mixtures used in the production of a new ultrasound contrast agent consisting of stabilized microbubbles. J Phys Chem. 1996;100:13815–21. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Basude R, Duckworth JW, Wheatley MA. Influence of environmental conditions on a new surfactant-based contrast agent: ST68. Ultrasound Med Bio. 2000;26:621–8. doi: 10.1016/s0301-5629(99)00151-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Wheatley MA, Forsberg F, Dube N, Patel M, Oeffinger BE. Surfactant-stabilized contrast agent on the nanoscale for diagnostic ultrasound imaging. Ultrasound Med Bio. 2006;32:83–93. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2005.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Price RJ, Skyba DM, Kaul S, Skalak TC. Delivery of colloidal, particles and red blood cells to tissue through microvessel ruptures created by targeted microbubble destruction with ultrasound. Circulation. 1998;98:1264–7. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.98.13.1264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Bekeredjian R, Chen SY, Frenkel PA, Grayburn PA, Shohet RV. Ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction can repeatedly direct highly specific plasmid expression to the heart. Circulation. 2003;108:1022–6. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000084535.35435.AE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Zha Z, Wang S, Zhang S, Qu E, Ke H, Wang J, et al. Targeted delivery of CuS nanoparticles through ultrasound image-guided microbubble destruction for efficient photothermal therapy. Nanoscale. 2013;5:3216–9. doi: 10.1039/c3nr00541k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Cui WJ, Bei JZ, Wang SG, Zhi G, Zhao YY, Zhou XS, et al. Preparation and evaluation of poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) microbubbles as a contrast agent for myocardial contrast echocardiography. J Biomed Mater Res B. 2005;73:171–8. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.30189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.El-Sherif DM, Lathia JD, Le NT, Wheatley MA. Ultrasound degradation of novel polymer contrast agents. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2004;68:71–8. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.20032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Ke H, Wang J, Dai Z, Jin Y, Qu E, Xing Z, et al. Bifunctional gold nanorod-loaded polymeric microcapsules for both contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging and photothermal therapy. J Mater Chem. 2011;21:5561–4. [Google Scholar]
- 67.Hirsch LR, Stafford RJ, Bankson JA, Sershen SR, Rivera B, Price RE, et al. Nanoshell-mediated near-infrared thermal therapy of tumors under magnetic resonance guidance. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:13549–54. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2232479100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Yang J, Lee J, Kang J, Oh SJ, Ko HJ, Son JH, et al. Smart Drug-Loaded Polymer Gold Nanoshells for Systemic and Localized Therapy of Human Epithelial Cancer. Adv Mater. 2009;21:4339–42. doi: 10.1002/adma.200900334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Ke H, Wang J, Dai Z, Jin Y, Qu E, Xing Z, et al. Gold-nanoshelled microcapsules: a theranostic agent for ultrasound contrast imaging and photothermal therapy. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2011;50:3017–21. doi: 10.1002/anie.201008286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Wang S, Dai Z, Ke H, Qu E, Qi X, Zhang K, et al. Contrast ultrasound-guided photothermal therapy using gold nanoshelled microcapsules in breast cancer. Eur J Radiol. 2014;83:117–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Connor EE, Mwamuka J, Gole A, Murphy CJ, Wyatt MD. Gold nanoparticles are taken up by human cells but do not cause acute cytotoxicity. Small. 2005;1:325–7. doi: 10.1002/smll.200400093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Shukla R, Bansal V, Chaudhary M, Basu A, Bhonde RR, Sastry M. Biocompatibility of gold nanoparticles and their endocytotic fate inside the cellular compartment: A microscopic overview. Langmuir. 2005;21:10644–54. doi: 10.1021/la0513712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Hayat MA. Colloidal Gold: Principles, Methods, and Applications. Hayat MA, editor. San Diego, CA: Academic; 1989.
- 74.Geso M. Gold nanoparticles: a new X-ray contrast agent. Br J Radiol. 2007;80:64–5. doi: 10.1259/bjr/28250432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Popovtzer R, Agrawal A, Kotov NA, Popovtzer A, Balter J, Carey TE, et al. Targeted gold nanoparticles enable molecular CT imaging of cancer. Nano Lett. 2008;8:4593–6. doi: 10.1021/nl8029114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Kim D, Park S, Lee JH, Jeong YY, Jon S. Antibiofouling polymer-coated gold nanoparticles as a contrast agent for in vivo x-ray computed tomography imaging . J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:7661–5. doi: 10.1021/ja071471p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Alric C, Taleb J, Le Duc G, Mandon C, Billotey C, Le Meur-Herland A, et al. Gadolinium chelate coated gold nanoparticles as contrast agents for both X-ray computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:5908–15. doi: 10.1021/ja078176p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Jin Y, Wang J, Ke H, Wang S, Dai Z. Graphene oxide modified PLA microcapsules containing gold nanoparticles for ultrasonic/CT bimodal imaging guided photothermal tumor therapy. Biomaterials. 2013;34:4794–802. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Sun Y, Zheng Y, Ran H, Zhou Y, Shen H, Chen Y, et al. Superparamagnetic PLGA-iron oxide microcapsules for dual-modality US/MR imaging and high intensity focused US breast cancer ablation. Biomaterials. 2012;33:5854–64. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Niu C, Wang Z, Lu G, Krupka TM, Sun Y, You Y, et al. Doxorubicin loaded superparamagnetic PLGA-iron oxide multifunctional microbubbles for dual-mode US/MR imaging and therapy of metastasis in lymph nodes. Biomaterials. 2013;34:2307–17. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Huang HY, Hu SH, Hung SY, Chiang CS, Liu HL, Chiu TL, et al. SPIO nanoparticle-stabilized PAA-F127 thermosensitive nanobubbles with MR/US dual-modality imaging and HIFU-triggered drug release for magnetically guided in vivo tumor therapy . J Control Release. 2013;172:118–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.07.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Li XD, Liang XL, Yue XL, Wang JR, Li CH, Deng ZJ, et al. Imaging guided photothermal therapy using iron oxide loaded poly(lactic acid) microcapsules coated with graphene oxide. J Mater Chem B. 2014;2:217–23. doi: 10.1039/c3tb21281e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Jang J, Yoon H. Multigram-scale fabrication of monodisperse conducting polymer and magnetic carbon nanoparticles. Small. 2005;1:1195–9. doi: 10.1002/smll.200500237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Hong JY, Yoon H, Jang J. Kinetic study of the formation of polypyrrole nanoparticles in water-soluble polymer/metal cation systems: a light-scattering analysis. Small. 2010;6:679–86. doi: 10.1002/smll.200902231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Oh WK, Yoon H, Jang J. Size control of magnetic carbon nanoparticles for drug delivery. Biomaterials. 2010;31:1342–8. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.10.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Zha Z, Yue X, Ren Q, Dai Z. Uniform polypyrrole nanoparticles with high photothermal conversion efficiency for photothermal ablation of cancer cells. Adv Mater. 2013;25:777–82. doi: 10.1002/adma.201202211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Zha Z, Wang J, Qu E, Zhang S, Jin Y, Wang S, et al. Polypyrrole Hollow Microspheres as Echogenic Photothermal Agent for Ultrasound Imaging Guided Tumor Ablation. Sci Rep. 2013;3:2360. doi: 10.1038/srep02360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Tran TD, Caruthers SD, Hughes M, Marsh JN, Cyrus T, Winter PM, et al. Clinical applications of perfluorocarbon nanoparticles for molecular imaging and targeted therapeutics. Int J Nanomedicine. 2007;2:515–26. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Diaz-Lopez R, Tsapis N, Fattal E. Liquid perfluorocarbons as contrast agents for ultrasonography and (19)F-MRI. Pharm Res. 2010;27:1–16. doi: 10.1007/s11095-009-0001-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Pisani E, Tsapis N, Galaz B, Santin M, Berti R, Taulier N, et al. Perfluorooctyl Bromide Polymeric Capsules as Dual Contrast Agents for Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Adv Funct Mater. 2008;18:2963–71. [Google Scholar]
- 91.Pisani E, Tsapis N, Paris J, Nicolas V, Cattel L, Fattal E. Polymeric nano/microcapsules of liquid perfluorocarbons for ultrasonic imaging: physical characterization. Langmuir. 2006;22:4397–402. doi: 10.1021/la0601455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Lanza GM, Wallace KD, Fischer SE, Christy DH, Scott MJ, Trousil RL, et al. High-frequency ultrasonic detection of thrombi with a targeted contrast system. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1997;23:863–70. doi: 10.1016/s0301-5629(97)00046-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Kwon S, Wheatley MA. Development and characterization of PLA nanodispersion as a potential ultrasound contrast agent for cancer site imaging. Bioengineering Conference, 2005 Proceedings of the IEEE 31st Annual Northeast.
- 94.Hirsch LR, Stafford RJ, Bankson JA, Sershen SR, Rivera B, Price RE, et al. Nanoshell-mediated near-infrared thermal therapy of tumors under magnetic resonance guidance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:13549–54. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2232479100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Loo C, Lowery A, Halas NJ, West J, Drezek R. Immunotargeted nanoshells for integrated cancer imaging and therapy. Nano Letters. 2005;5:709–11. doi: 10.1021/nl050127s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Ke H, Yue X, Wang J, Xing S, Zhang Q, Dai Z, et al. Gold nanoshelled liquid perfluorocarbon nanocapsules for combined dual modal ultrasound/CT imaging and photothermal therapy of cancer. Small. 2014;10:1220–7. doi: 10.1002/smll.201302252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Ke H, Wang J, Tong S, Jin Y, Wang S, Qu E, et al. Gold Nanoshelled Liquid Perfluorocarbon Magnetic Nanocapsules: a Nanotheranostic Platform for Bimodal Ultrasound/Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Photothermal Tumor Ablation. Theranostics. 2014;4:12–23. doi: 10.7150/thno.7275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Niu D, Wang X, Li Y, Zheng Y, Li F, Chen H, et al. Facile Synthesis of Magnetite/Perfluorocarbon Co-Loaded Organic/Inorganic Hybrid Vesicles for Dual-Modality Ultrasound/Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Imaging-Guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation. Adv Mater. 2013;25:2686–92. doi: 10.1002/adma.201204316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Zha Z, Wang J, Zhang S, Wang S, Qu E, Zhang Y, et al. Engineering of perfluorooctylbromide polypyrrole nano-/microcapsules for simultaneous contrast enhanced ultrasound imaging and photothermal treatment of cancer. Biomaterials. 2014;35:287–93. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Wang X, Chen H, Chen Y, Ma M, Zhang K, Li F, et al. Perfluorohexane-Encapsulated Mesoporous Silica Nanocapsules as Enhancement Agents for Highly Efficient High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) Adv Mater. 2012;24:785–91. doi: 10.1002/adma.201104033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Jia X, Cai X, Chen Y, Wang S, Xu H, Zhang K, et al. Perfluoropentane-encapsulated hollow mesoporous prussian blue nanocubes for activated ultrasound imaging and photothermal therapy of cancer. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7:4579–88. doi: 10.1021/am507443p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]